Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Trailblazer lynx 😻🍑 | thinking about making another Chun li edit except in this format | code drya in the item shop 💓 #Fortnite #lynx #FortniteCreative #FortniteChapter5 #thicc

Zaii

10,431 subscribers

27,085 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Игры #Fortnite #lynx #FortniteCreative #FortniteChapter5 #thicc

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Vid is out btw, link in bio, name some skins in comments that I should "walk" with next 🍑 and use code dyra in the item shop please #ad #FortniteChapter5 #Fortnite

Vid is out btw, link in bio, name some skins in comments that I should "walk" with next 🍑 and use code dyra in the item shop please #ad #FortniteChapter5 #Fortnite

Zaii

18,168 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Cammy in slow motion 🍑 | Code Dyra is always free to use in the item shop 💕 #Fortnite #anime #gaming #SF6 #StreetFighter6 #cammy

Cammy in slow motion 🍑 | Code Dyra is always free to use in the item shop 💕 #Fortnite #anime #gaming #SF6 #StreetFighter6 #cammy

Zaii

47,329 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🟪 CUBE KING SKIN CONCEPT Many rumors about the Cube King being Dark Voyager's master, so there he is! Use code RLMERCURY in the item shop to support cool concepts like this 🫶 #Fortnite #EpicPartner

🟪 CUBE KING SKIN CONCEPT Many rumors about the Cube King being Dark Voyager's master, so there he is! Use code RLMERCURY in the item shop to support cool concepts like this 🫶 #Fortnite #EpicPartner

Mercury | Code RLMercury

12,799 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

why do janjing keep saying “ชื่นใจ (chun-jai)” these days? where did it come from? (#JanJingjing) simple definitions: - ชื่น (chun) means delighting/pleasing/uplifting - ใจ (jai) means heart - ชื่นใจ (chun-jai) means feeling happy and delighted at heart - ชื่นใจแจน/จิง (chun-jai jan/jing) means making jan/jing feel happy / delighting jan/jing at heart origin: 260702 Hotwave Krub (vid 1; 🐯: then we have to do it 🦊: do what? to delight jan? aftermath: the phrase has gone viral where, - e.g., even bonnie mentioned it in her live (vid 2) 💜: i go refill [janjingjing] all the time, so so much (i.e., refill in this context is like recharging via content). like “to make jan happy?” the phrase is then also used by janjing themselves to tease one another - e.g., jingjing swapped the original “chun-jai-jan” to “chun-jai-jingjing” for jan’s punishment (vid 3) 🐯: these days, people keep saying the phrase “to delight jan,” right? but, today, the winner (i.e., jingjing herself) wants “to delight jingjing.” 🦊: what should i do? 🐯: well it’s up to p’ to create [something]! 🦊: i don’t know~ you have to instruct me~ i just follow~ i’m a robot~ i just follow~ 🐯: hug until i’m delighted 🦊: 🫂 is this right? 🐯: i’m not that delighted yet 🦊: then what should i do to delight you? 🐯: tightly! 🦊: ok tightly~ 🫂 therefore, this explains the whole “delighting” saga in the past two days - e.g., after jan accidentally kissed jingjing on the cheek (vid 1 in mention) 🐯: what was that just now?? to delight jingjing??? her face is soooo red!!! -e.g., after this, jingjing posted (pic 1 in mention) 🐯: p’jan is so dazzling todayyyyyy🥰 she (secretly) did “delighting jingjing” for real hehe i’m pleased 55666666666666655 - e.g., janjing’s conversation about “delighting jing” the day after (pic 2 in mention) 🦊: last night, i dreamed about “delighting jing.” it was only a dream, right?🫠 (i.e., jan is trying to deny that it happened) 🐯: huh? 🦊: if that was real, p’ guess p’ would have to get “delighted” back 🐯: ok then don’t get bored [of me]🚨 so let’s look forward to more “chun-jai”ing jan and jing 😜❤️🩷🤟🏻

why do janjing keep saying “ชื่นใจ (chun-jai)” these days? where did it come from? (#JanJingjing) simple definitions: - ชื่น (chun) means delighting/pleasing/uplifting - ใจ (jai) means heart - ชื่นใจ (chun-jai) means feeling happy and delighted at heart - ชื่นใจแจน/จิง (chun-jai jan/jing) means making jan/jing feel happy / delighting jan/jing at heart origin: 260702 Hotwave Krub (vid 1; 🐯: then we have to do it 🦊: do what? to delight jan? aftermath: the phrase has gone viral where, - e.g., even bonnie mentioned it in her live (vid 2) 💜: i go refill [janjingjing] all the time, so so much (i.e., refill in this context is like recharging via content). like “to make jan happy?” the phrase is then also used by janjing themselves to tease one another - e.g., jingjing swapped the original “chun-jai-jan” to “chun-jai-jingjing” for jan’s punishment (vid 3) 🐯: these days, people keep saying the phrase “to delight jan,” right? but, today, the winner (i.e., jingjing herself) wants “to delight jingjing.” 🦊: what should i do? 🐯: well it’s up to p’ to create [something]! 🦊: i don’t know~ you have to instruct me~ i just follow~ i’m a robot~ i just follow~ 🐯: hug until i’m delighted 🦊: 🫂 is this right? 🐯: i’m not that delighted yet 🦊: then what should i do to delight you? 🐯: tightly! 🦊: ok tightly~ 🫂 therefore, this explains the whole “delighting” saga in the past two days - e.g., after jan accidentally kissed jingjing on the cheek (vid 1 in mention) 🐯: what was that just now?? to delight jingjing??? her face is soooo red!!! -e.g., after this, jingjing posted (pic 1 in mention) 🐯: p’jan is so dazzling todayyyyyy🥰 she (secretly) did “delighting jingjing” for real hehe i’m pleased 55666666666666655 - e.g., janjing’s conversation about “delighting jing” the day after (pic 2 in mention) 🦊: last night, i dreamed about “delighting jing.” it was only a dream, right?🫠 (i.e., jan is trying to deny that it happened) 🐯: huh? 🦊: if that was real, p’ guess p’ would have to get “delighted” back 🐯: ok then don’t get bored [of me]🚨 so let’s look forward to more “chun-jai”ing jan and jing 😜❤️🩷🤟🏻

²²

56,997 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

There’s a feeling of “wtf is a designer anymore” floating around… I felt it while scrolling Reddit after Figma Make was announced 😬 For some people it simply didn’t compute that a code prototype could be a design artifact. But I’ll let you in on a little secret… A few days ago I visited a well-known design leader and he said that in the last 6 months, ~40% of their team's design artifacts are now created in Lovable, Bolt, etc. That’s kind of crazy, right? It's a big reason why Ioana Teleanu (1st AI designer at Miro) said design is "in the middle of an identity crisis" So Ioana and I went deep into this topic during today's episode and I want to share a few ideas I’m still thinking about: ——— We’re in a weird moment in history where there are AI designers and non-AI designers. But this is a blip on the timeline as adoption accelerates. The idea of "AI designer" won't exist in the future Here's what Ioana said 👇 “We’re all gonna be thinking about some sort of AI angle in the way we do our work. I don’t even feel that the AI design role will exist in this explicit format in a couple of years. All the designers will be AI designers” I want to make something clear though... Ioana described herself as generally “change averse” and the type of person who "DOESN'T jump on new things" That’s why her initial approach to AI was a bit less intentional… But now she’s changed her tune: “We have a moral duty to experiment with these technologies because we're designers and we should be curious about the world, and we should be curious about the future.” The cost of ignoring new technology has never been higher So if you’re interested in what it looks like to design AI experiences within your existing product then I think you’ll really enjoy this week's episode Ioana shares a ton of lessons learned from Miro and frameworks for how she helps clients integrate AI effectively 👇

There’s a feeling of “wtf is a designer anymore” floating around… I felt it while scrolling Reddit after Figma Make was announced 😬 For some people it simply didn’t compute that a code prototype could be a design artifact. But I’ll let you in on a little secret… A few days ago I visited a well-known design leader and he said that in the last 6 months, ~40% of their team's design artifacts are now created in Lovable, Bolt, etc. That’s kind of crazy, right? It's a big reason why Ioana Teleanu (1st AI designer at Miro) said design is "in the middle of an identity crisis" So Ioana and I went deep into this topic during today's episode and I want to share a few ideas I’m still thinking about: ——— We’re in a weird moment in history where there are AI designers and non-AI designers. But this is a blip on the timeline as adoption accelerates. The idea of "AI designer" won't exist in the future Here's what Ioana said 👇 “We’re all gonna be thinking about some sort of AI angle in the way we do our work. I don’t even feel that the AI design role will exist in this explicit format in a couple of years. All the designers will be AI designers” I want to make something clear though... Ioana described herself as generally “change averse” and the type of person who "DOESN'T jump on new things" That’s why her initial approach to AI was a bit less intentional… But now she’s changed her tune: “We have a moral duty to experiment with these technologies because we're designers and we should be curious about the world, and we should be curious about the future.” The cost of ignoring new technology has never been higher So if you’re interested in what it looks like to design AI experiences within your existing product then I think you’ll really enjoy this week's episode Ioana shares a ton of lessons learned from Miro and frameworks for how she helps clients integrate AI effectively 👇

Ridd 🤿

42,098 просмотров • 1 год назад

My dad was at the stove when I walked in. Haven't seen him in 3 months. He looked older. "You cook now?" "Only on Sundays." "What changed?" "Time makes sense when the code works." He laughed. "What code?" "Trading systems. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." Copytrade wallet: He cracked an egg. "So you code for free?" "No dad. The code makes money." "Sure it does, son." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop on the counter. One wallet I was tracking cleared $2,800 in a single weekend. Another flipped 156 trades in 48 hours with 78% winrate. One more turned $950 into $14,200 in 17 days. He put the spatula down. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Nine months." "And you didn't tell me?" I didn't have a good answer. He slid a plate of eggs across the counter. Sat down across from me. "Send me the links. I'm reading them tonight." Then: "And come home more often. Your mom worries." Fathers don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them. Then they ask you to come home more.

My dad was at the stove when I walked in. Haven't seen him in 3 months. He looked older. "You cook now?" "Only on Sundays." "What changed?" "Time makes sense when the code works." He laughed. "What code?" "Trading systems. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." Copytrade wallet: He cracked an egg. "So you code for free?" "No dad. The code makes money." "Sure it does, son." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop on the counter. One wallet I was tracking cleared $2,800 in a single weekend. Another flipped 156 trades in 48 hours with 78% winrate. One more turned $950 into $14,200 in 17 days. He put the spatula down. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Nine months." "And you didn't tell me?" I didn't have a good answer. He slid a plate of eggs across the counter. Sat down across from me. "Send me the links. I'm reading them tonight." Then: "And come home more often. Your mom worries." Fathers don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them. Then they ask you to come home more.

Lunar

10,443 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

My girlfriend's parents came over for dinner Saturday. First time at my place. Her dad walked in. Looked around. Saw the laptop, the second monitor, the three terminal panels. "So this is where you work." "Yeah." "What, just the laptop?" "Just the laptop. And the repos." He raised an eyebrow. "Repos?" "Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." He laughed. "So you code for free?" "No sir. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $640 into $11,800 in 31 days. Another flipped 287 trades with 76% winrate. One more pulled $3.4M in volume in two weeks. He put his beer down. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell us?" I didn't have a good answer. Her mom asked for the links before the pasta was done. Copytrade him: Fathers-in-law don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them. Then the mom does the rest.

My girlfriend's parents came over for dinner Saturday. First time at my place. Her dad walked in. Looked around. Saw the laptop, the second monitor, the three terminal panels. "So this is where you work." "Yeah." "What, just the laptop?" "Just the laptop. And the repos." He raised an eyebrow. "Repos?" "Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." He laughed. "So you code for free?" "No sir. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $640 into $11,800 in 31 days. Another flipped 287 trades with 76% winrate. One more pulled $3.4M in volume in two weeks. He put his beer down. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell us?" I didn't have a good answer. Her mom asked for the links before the pasta was done. Copytrade him: Fathers-in-law don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them. Then the mom does the rest.

Lunar

45,349 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My dad called Sunday morning. Said he was in the neighborhood. "Did you eat?" "No." "I'll grab bagels." He showed up an hour later. Sat at the kitchen table. Looked around. "So this is what you do all day." "Yeah." "What, you just code?" "Trading systems. Open-source. Anyone can see the code." He took a bite of his bagel. "So you code for free?" "No, dad. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $480 into $6,900 in 19 days. Another moved $5.3M in volume. One more had a 74% winrate across 214 trades. Sharpe 2.31. I didn't touch it once. He stopped chewing. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell me?" I didn't have a good answer. Profile: Fathers don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell them.

Lunar

12,991 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

My girlfriend walked into my home office Friday at 11pm. "Are you still working?" "What?" "It's Friday. Eleven at night. Why are you on the laptop?" "Just checking the bot." She leaned against the doorframe. "What bot?" "The trading one. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She stared at me. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking cleared $2,800 in a single weekend. Another flipped 156 trades in 48 hours with 78% winrate. One more turned $950 into $14,200 in 17 days. She walked in. Closed the door. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "Why are you only telling me this now?" "We've been dating nine months." "Exactly. Nine months." I didn't have a good answer. She sat on the desk. Looked at me. "You're going to show me everything. Tonight. From the top. I'm not asking." Profile: Girlfriends don't ask about the money. They ask why you waited nine months. Then they take over the conversation.

Lunar

42,542 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Had lunch with my dad. He always asks about my work. "Building trading systems." "So like crypto?" "No. Open-source. Anyone can see how it works." He shook his head. "Yeah sure." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet returned 82% over 8 weeks. Another moved $6.4M in volume. One more turned $450 to $5,600. He stopped talking. "That's... actual money?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. First: 86M+ trades. Every outcome on Polymarket since day one. Free. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML patterns. Spotted that $450 → $5,600 before it moved. He leaned back in his chair. Then: "Your uncle has been looking for something like this." Profile: No finance degree. No hedge fund. Just code and curiosity.

Lunar

24,469 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Met my girlfriend's parents for the first time. Her dad shook my hand. "So what do you do?" "Building trading systems." "Like Wall Street?" "No. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." He laughed. "So you code for free?" "No sir. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking made $11,400 in 19 days. Another moved $5.3M in volume. One more had a 74% winrate across 214 trades. Sharpe 2.31. I didn't touch it once. He stopped smiling. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed him the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. He went quiet for a long time. Then: "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you didn't tell my daughter?" I didn't have a good answer. Her mom asked for the links before dessert. Profile: Fathers-in-law don't ask about the money. They ask why you didn't tell their daughter. Then the mom does the rest.

Lunar

20,127 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A 17 year old high schooler told his mom he needed a Steam Deck for school. She said no, it's a gaming console. He said it runs Linux. She didn't know what that means. Bought it for his birthday. $280. He never installed a single game on it. Opened the terminal, installed Claude Code and typed his first command while holding the device like a PlayStation controller. Thumbsticks on both sides. Code editor in the middle. The most ridiculous dev setup anyone has ever seen. At second 0:09 you can read what he typed into the terminal: claude your code looks like absolute shit Claude didn't argue. Just started rewriting the shader, adding bloom effects, fixing chromatic aberration and improving the particle system. On a gaming console held in two hands on a couch. His friends play Fortnite on their Steam Decks. He builds software on his while lying in bed. He set up Claude Code with custom skills, hooks that auto run tests every time a file is saved and memory that remembers every project across sessions. The stuff most developers pay $200 a month for and use at maybe 20% capacity. He runs it on a $280 handheld and squeezes out every feature. Within three weeks he had built and sold four small apps to local businesses. A booking page for a barber shop, an inventory tracker for a vape store, a menu site for a taco truck and a scheduling tool for a dog groomer. All built on a Steam Deck in his bedroom. All coded by Claude while he gave instructions with his thumbs. Made over $13,000 in his first month. His mom still thinks he plays games on it. His teacher caught him using it during study hall. Looked at the screen expecting a game. Saw green code scrolling and Claude asking: Do you want to make this edit to main.js ? Teacher had no idea what she was looking at. Told him to put it away. He closed the lid. Claude kept running inside. A $280 gaming console that his mom bought thinking it was a toy is now a development workstation that earns more per month than her car payment. Setup time: 20 minutes once. Time he saves every day: 3 to 5 hours. Money made in month one: $13,000. Games installed: zero. His grandpa asked him to install FIFA last weekend. He said the console is busy. Grandpa asked doing what. He said working. Grandpa didn't ask again.

A 17 year old high schooler told his mom he needed a Steam Deck for school. She said no, it's a gaming console. He said it runs Linux. She didn't know what that means. Bought it for his birthday. $280. He never installed a single game on it. Opened the terminal, installed Claude Code and typed his first command while holding the device like a PlayStation controller. Thumbsticks on both sides. Code editor in the middle. The most ridiculous dev setup anyone has ever seen. At second 0:09 you can read what he typed into the terminal: claude your code looks like absolute shit Claude didn't argue. Just started rewriting the shader, adding bloom effects, fixing chromatic aberration and improving the particle system. On a gaming console held in two hands on a couch. His friends play Fortnite on their Steam Decks. He builds software on his while lying in bed. He set up Claude Code with custom skills, hooks that auto run tests every time a file is saved and memory that remembers every project across sessions. The stuff most developers pay $200 a month for and use at maybe 20% capacity. He runs it on a $280 handheld and squeezes out every feature. Within three weeks he had built and sold four small apps to local businesses. A booking page for a barber shop, an inventory tracker for a vape store, a menu site for a taco truck and a scheduling tool for a dog groomer. All built on a Steam Deck in his bedroom. All coded by Claude while he gave instructions with his thumbs. Made over $13,000 in his first month. His mom still thinks he plays games on it. His teacher caught him using it during study hall. Looked at the screen expecting a game. Saw green code scrolling and Claude asking: Do you want to make this edit to main.js ? Teacher had no idea what she was looking at. Told him to put it away. He closed the lid. Claude kept running inside. A $280 gaming console that his mom bought thinking it was a toy is now a development workstation that earns more per month than her car payment. Setup time: 20 minutes once. Time he saves every day: 3 to 5 hours. Money made in month one: $13,000. Games installed: zero. His grandpa asked him to install FIFA last weekend. He said the console is busy. Grandpa asked doing what. He said working. Grandpa didn't ask again.

Marlow

3,237,526 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

My girlfriend came home Friday at 1am. I was on the couch. Laptop open. Three terminal panels scrolling. "You're still up?" "Just checking the bot." She dropped her bag. "What bot?" "The trading one. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She stared at me. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $640 into $11,800 in 31 days. Another flipped 287 trades with 76% winrate. One more pulled $3.4M in volume in two weeks. She sat down next to me. Slowly. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "Why are you only telling me this now?" "We've been dating eleven months." "Exactly. Eleven months." I didn't have a good answer. She closed my laptop lid. Looked at me. "You're going to show me everything. Tomorrow morning. From the top. I'm not asking." Trade with him: Girlfriends don't ask about the money. They ask why you waited eleven months. Then they take over the conversation.

My girlfriend came home Friday at 1am. I was on the couch. Laptop open. Three terminal panels scrolling. "You're still up?" "Just checking the bot." She dropped her bag. "What bot?" "The trading one. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She stared at me. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $640 into $11,800 in 31 days. Another flipped 287 trades with 76% winrate. One more pulled $3.4M in volume in two weeks. She sat down next to me. Slowly. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "Why are you only telling me this now?" "We've been dating eleven months." "Exactly. Eleven months." I didn't have a good answer. She closed my laptop lid. Looked at me. "You're going to show me everything. Tomorrow morning. From the top. I'm not asking." Trade with him: Girlfriends don't ask about the money. They ask why you waited eleven months. Then they take over the conversation.

Lunar

104,135 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

AI is not accelerating nearly fast enough to cure cancer. That is the problem. And it literally cannot without actually seeing what’s happening inside the cell. There’s this new project claiming their models will “solve” cancer by predicting drug responses at scale. Cool story. Except their entire approach still treats the cell like a black box. They’re optimizing for binding affinity while having zero idea what the drug actually does once it’s inside a real, living cell. Meanwhile we’re over here building the tools to watch the cell in real time. No staining or sequencing. Just direct observation of mechanism. You can simulate all you want. But if you can’t see the actual cellular response, you’re just making very confident guesses about something you’ve never actually looked at. We’ve spent two years proving this. The data is there. The difference is night and day. AI is a tool. It’s not the microscope. If your model can’t tell you why a drug is killing the wrong cells or why resistance is forming in real time… it’s not ready to cure cancer. It’s ready to waste another billion dollars. We’re not competing with AI. We’re giving it eyes. Goodbye.

AI is not accelerating nearly fast enough to cure cancer. That is the problem. And it literally cannot without actually seeing what’s happening inside the cell. There’s this new project claiming their models will “solve” cancer by predicting drug responses at scale. Cool story. Except their entire approach still treats the cell like a black box. They’re optimizing for binding affinity while having zero idea what the drug actually does once it’s inside a real, living cell. Meanwhile we’re over here building the tools to watch the cell in real time. No staining or sequencing. Just direct observation of mechanism. You can simulate all you want. But if you can’t see the actual cellular response, you’re just making very confident guesses about something you’ve never actually looked at. We’ve spent two years proving this. The data is there. The difference is night and day. AI is a tool. It’s not the microscope. If your model can’t tell you why a drug is killing the wrong cells or why resistance is forming in real time… it’s not ready to cure cancer. It’s ready to waste another billion dollars. We’re not competing with AI. We’re giving it eyes. Goodbye.

Parmita Mishra

48,203 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My girlfriend noticed something Sunday morning. "You're smiling at your laptop." "What?" "You. At 9am. On a Sunday. Smiling." I shrugged. "Just checking the bot." She put her coffee down. "What bot?" "The trading one. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She stared at me. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking cleared $2,800 in a single weekend. Another flipped 156 trades in 48 hours with 78% winrate. One more turned $950 into $14,200 in 17 days. She stopped mid-sip. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "Why are you only telling me this now?" "We've been dating nine months." "Exactly. Nine months." I didn't have a good answer. She closed her laptop lid. Looked at me. "You're going to show me everything tonight. From the top. I'm not asking." Profile: Girlfriends don't ask about the money. They ask why you waited nine months. Then they take over the conversation.

Lunar

18,948 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

My Tinder date showed up 10 minutes late. She ordered an oat latte. Looked around. Looked at me. "So. What do you do?" "Building trading systems." "Like crypto?" "No. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She raised an eyebrow. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $1,300 into $19,700 in 24 days. Another flipped 232 trades with 82% winrate. One more pulled $5.8M in volume in five weeks. She stopped stirring her coffee. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "I do product marketing at a startup. $82K. I cried in the parking lot last Tuesday." I didn't say anything. She finished her coffee. Looked at me. "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you're on Tinder?" I didn't have a good answer. She opened her phone. Unmatched me on Hinge. Then handed it back: "No. Send me the GitHub links instead." Copytrade him: Tinder dates don't ask about the money. They ask why you're on the app. Then they keep the links and leave you unmatched.

My Tinder date showed up 10 minutes late. She ordered an oat latte. Looked around. Looked at me. "So. What do you do?" "Building trading systems." "Like crypto?" "No. Open-source. Anyone can audit the code." She raised an eyebrow. "So you code for free?" "No. The code makes money." "Sure it does." I didn't argue. I opened my laptop. One wallet I was tracking turned $1,300 into $19,700 in 24 days. Another flipped 232 trades with 82% winrate. One more pulled $5.8M in volume in five weeks. She stopped stirring her coffee. "That's... from a script?" Exactly. Then I showed her the repos. All free. All public. First: 86M+ trades on Polymarket. Every outcome since day one. Free to download. Second: Market making bot. Both sides of the book. Gas optimized. Google Sheets execution. Third: ML + heuristics. I fed 14,000 wallets into Claude. One prompt. 4 minutes. Found 47 traders with 70%+ winrate. Bot mirrors them with 60-second delay. She went quiet for a long time. Then: "I do product marketing at a startup. $82K. I cried in the parking lot last Tuesday." I didn't say anything. She finished her coffee. Looked at me. "How long have you been doing this?" "Eight months." "And you're on Tinder?" I didn't have a good answer. She opened her phone. Unmatched me on Hinge. Then handed it back: "No. Send me the GitHub links instead." Copytrade him: Tinder dates don't ask about the money. They ask why you're on the app. Then they keep the links and leave you unmatched.

Lunar

48,767 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sure, but the idea of simplifying the appearance of Fortnite, the locker and the shop are all going in the exact opposite direction of simplicity. Equipping cosmetics takes double, if not triple the clicks. The UI is impractical and janky, not to mention the introduction of buttons and drop-down menus that were far easier to access previously. Selecting a skin to rotate it, preview it or even spin it around now requires clicking on it, which then applies it to your loadout. Previously this needed a confirm button so you could preview and choose skins, backblings etc without loosing your currently equipped on if you want to go back. Wraps are not included as part of a character's preset despite being completely relevant to the skin worn. Changing emotes, lobby tracks, and all cosmetics now means you have to back out and change tabs, something that could have previously been done on 1 page. The sectioned tabs make sense with new types like LEGO Kits, Cars, Instruments but there's no need to separate Character from Wraps, Emotes or Lobby. Archiving or Favoriting items can no longer be done in batches or quickly. Previously all you had to do was click once per cosmetic on the button but now you have to enter a drop down and select it for every individual item. Applying wraps to all slots now requires a drop down menu rather than simply clicking the button at the bottom. Swinging a pickaxe or redeploying a glider is near impossible to do and feels like more of a chore to actually accomplish with the drop-down menu. It overlays onto other items meaning as soon as it's clicked the menu vanishes and switches to another cosmetic before the animation can even begin. Cosmetics in the locker can be searched by seasons using "S1-17" but after S18+ they no longer filter. Entering the drop-down menu or right-clicking anything in the locker accidentally immediately takes you all the way back to your currently equipped item when exiting. The filter menu requires an "apply" button to be pressed rather than simply closing and applying when selecting one of the filters, taking longer and more clicks to simply find your recent items or remove a filter. The filter menu was also better as a side panel so you don't have to move your cursor to the center of the screen and back every single time. As a side panel it also allowed for more options to be displayed, whereas the current one requires a huge scroll bar to simply filter by favorite. The presets menu scroll wheel also zooms the skins in and out as you scroll up and down the list. Because of the randomize preset button, the list compared to when saving a preset is all moved up by 1, becoming disorientating to where the preset was in relation to the rows. The shop no longer displays item descriptions or set names on cosmetics - now requiring a click on each individual item when there is adequate space to do so. The new shop and locker appearance can be accustomed to, however, it NEEDS the basic functionality and user-friendly UI elements that the previous ones had. Simple buttons at the bottom to favorite, swing, redeploy and equip. Less tabs to switch between, less clicks required to complete simple tasks and less feeling like there's a battle against the UI itself just to equip the cosmetics you paid for. We appreciate the moves the renew the locker and shop, but in terms of functionality and user interaction, there is nothing we want more than the old one back or the old one's elements merged into the new appearance. Thank you.

Sure, but the idea of simplifying the appearance of Fortnite, the locker and the shop are all going in the exact opposite direction of simplicity. Equipping cosmetics takes double, if not triple the clicks. The UI is impractical and janky, not to mention the introduction of buttons and drop-down menus that were far easier to access previously. Selecting a skin to rotate it, preview it or even spin it around now requires clicking on it, which then applies it to your loadout. Previously this needed a confirm button so you could preview and choose skins, backblings etc without loosing your currently equipped on if you want to go back. Wraps are not included as part of a character's preset despite being completely relevant to the skin worn. Changing emotes, lobby tracks, and all cosmetics now means you have to back out and change tabs, something that could have previously been done on 1 page. The sectioned tabs make sense with new types like LEGO Kits, Cars, Instruments but there's no need to separate Character from Wraps, Emotes or Lobby. Archiving or Favoriting items can no longer be done in batches or quickly. Previously all you had to do was click once per cosmetic on the button but now you have to enter a drop down and select it for every individual item. Applying wraps to all slots now requires a drop down menu rather than simply clicking the button at the bottom. Swinging a pickaxe or redeploying a glider is near impossible to do and feels like more of a chore to actually accomplish with the drop-down menu. It overlays onto other items meaning as soon as it's clicked the menu vanishes and switches to another cosmetic before the animation can even begin. Cosmetics in the locker can be searched by seasons using "S1-17" but after S18+ they no longer filter. Entering the drop-down menu or right-clicking anything in the locker accidentally immediately takes you all the way back to your currently equipped item when exiting. The filter menu requires an "apply" button to be pressed rather than simply closing and applying when selecting one of the filters, taking longer and more clicks to simply find your recent items or remove a filter. The filter menu was also better as a side panel so you don't have to move your cursor to the center of the screen and back every single time. As a side panel it also allowed for more options to be displayed, whereas the current one requires a huge scroll bar to simply filter by favorite. The presets menu scroll wheel also zooms the skins in and out as you scroll up and down the list. Because of the randomize preset button, the list compared to when saving a preset is all moved up by 1, becoming disorientating to where the preset was in relation to the rows. The shop no longer displays item descriptions or set names on cosmetics - now requiring a click on each individual item when there is adequate space to do so. The new shop and locker appearance can be accustomed to, however, it NEEDS the basic functionality and user-friendly UI elements that the previous ones had. Simple buttons at the bottom to favorite, swing, redeploy and equip. Less tabs to switch between, less clicks required to complete simple tasks and less feeling like there's a battle against the UI itself just to equip the cosmetics you paid for. We appreciate the moves the renew the locker and shop, but in terms of functionality and user interaction, there is nothing we want more than the old one back or the old one's elements merged into the new appearance. Thank you.

FNAssist

178,290 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A GUY BUILT A SHOPIFY DROPSHIPPING STORE AND THE ORDERS ARE POURING IN NON-STOP AT $20-$50 A POP. His phone is resting on his laptop keyboard. On the screen, Shopify notifications for new orders are popping up endlessly, each one with that satisfying cash register sound. No complex product here. Just a trending item he found through a supplier, slapped a markup on, and threw some ads behind. The funny part is, people aren’t buying it because it’s rare or sophisticated. They’re buying because they saw it in their feed, it scratched an immediate itch right then and there, and checking out was easier than actually thinking about it. The playbook is simple: > A Shopify store that handles payments and tracks orders automatically. > A supplier's product with the supplier shipping it directly to the customer. > TikTok and Instagram Reels ads driving the traffic. Orders are flooding in: #7477, #7482, one after another, each between $10 and $50. The price difference between the supplier and his store is pure profit. The ads run 24/7. By morning, he wakes up to new paid orders that he didn't even have to lift a finger for. Just a straightforward blueprint built on a product that people scrolling their feeds want every single day. Bookmark this 👀

A GUY BUILT A SHOPIFY DROPSHIPPING STORE AND THE ORDERS ARE POURING IN NON-STOP AT $20-$50 A POP. His phone is resting on his laptop keyboard. On the screen, Shopify notifications for new orders are popping up endlessly, each one with that satisfying cash register sound. No complex product here. Just a trending item he found through a supplier, slapped a markup on, and threw some ads behind. The funny part is, people aren’t buying it because it’s rare or sophisticated. They’re buying because they saw it in their feed, it scratched an immediate itch right then and there, and checking out was easier than actually thinking about it. The playbook is simple: > A Shopify store that handles payments and tracks orders automatically. > A supplier's product with the supplier shipping it directly to the customer. > TikTok and Instagram Reels ads driving the traffic. Orders are flooding in: #7477, #7482, one after another, each between $10 and $50. The price difference between the supplier and his store is pure profit. The ads run 24/7. By morning, he wakes up to new paid orders that he didn't even have to lift a finger for. Just a straightforward blueprint built on a product that people scrolling their feeds want every single day. Bookmark this 👀

Lummox

21,176 просмотров • 1 месяц назад