Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Trans Student Tries to Debate Michael Knowles on Campus — Then Regrets It” Michael Knowles: So, you support abortion? Trans Person: Absolutely. Michael Knowles: I'm just a little confused as to what non-binary means. Trans Person: Non-binary means I am not a man or a woman, regardless of what...

805,011 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Candace Owens and Marc Lamont Hill Debate Whether Transgender Pronouns Should Be Honoured Marc Lamont Hill: If I told you my pronouns were "she, her," you would address me as "she and her," right? Candace Owens: No, I wouldn't. I would call you Marc. Marc Lamont Hill: But if I said my name was Jane, would you call me Jane? Candace Owens: If that was your legal name, yes. But I'm not going to change these established pronouns for male and female. Marc Lamont Hill: This isn't a case of someone thinking they're something they're not. What people are saying is there is a misalignment between my sex and my gender. Candace Owens: Disorder. My mind and my body don't match, that's a disorder. Marc Lamont Hill: That doesn't make it a disorder. It means the world may be more diverse than we've previously understood it to be. If someone says, "I prefer to be called she and her, and I no longer want to be identified by this name," why not just honour that? Candace Owens: If you changed your name, I will honour it. But if you're asking me to change pronouns, I'm not going to do that. These are established pronouns. You're asking me to change the English language. We know why we call female "she," "her," "girl," "woman." These are words that have meanings. If this mug wants to be called a book it's a mug. You're asking me to change the actual meaning of words to accommodate you. I'm not going to do that. Marc Lamont Hill: The argument of the trans community is not, "I'm actually a man, but I want you to pretend I'm a woman." The argument is, "No, I am a woman, and so I want you to affirm me as Candace Owens: But you're not a woman. That's the problem. Just because you think something doesn't make it real. Marc Lamont Hill: But that's exactly what gender is. Gender is about an experience, a performance, and a social construct. Candace Owens: It's not a social construct. Stop saying social construct. You say words don't have meaning and they're socially constructed, but then our entire discussion about Black America meant nothing. There's no such thing as racial injustice because Black is a social construct. Marc Lamont Hill: Yeah, but we live in a social reality. Candace Owens: You can't have both, Marc.

Jeff

426,715 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

“Pearl tells Michael Knowles what she learned after interviewing 1,000 women about why men avoid marriage” Pearl: I started reacting to Red Pill content, and I didn't understand why men were complaining about dating. I kept hearing men complaining and complaining about dating. So, I ended up doing a panel show where I interviewed a thousand women about dating and relationships. And I actually came to the point where I could see where the guys were coming from. I also wanted to know: why don't men want to get married anymore? I grew up in a two-parent home. My parents have been married for 30 years. I didn't understand it. And I came to find out that when men have children in the United States, they're not legally entitled to their children. I think it's the biggest issue that we're facing right now. Single-mother homes, they lead to school shooters, you're more likely to commit crimes—every problem in society comes from single-mother homes. And what I found is that men are not getting married because they don't want relationships. They fear divorce. Michael Knowles: Marriage the family is the fundamental political unit. So you crack that up, you're going to crack up society. Pearl: Yeah. My documentary is called Why Don't Men Want to Get Married Anymore? It dives into the problems as to why the institution of marriage is failing. Michael Knowles: So, what do we do about it? Pearl: I think the first thing you need to do is switch the laws to make them more favourable and fair. For example, the Tender Years Doctrine assumes that the mother is the best one for the child under the age of seven. In some states, it extends to 16. That's openly sexist. Michael Knowles: What evidence do we have that the mother is the best one with the children? Pearl: The kids are the most likely to be abused by the mother, not the father. Michael Knowles: That's a little unclear because children are much more likely to be with the mother, not only in divorce, but also in a traditional family where dad is at work and mum is home with the kids. Pearl: But the way the laws are set up, it punishes men for being traditional. I think sometimes you guys are a bit out of touch with what the average man is going through in this country. Michael Knowles: Do men have valid fears in getting married? Pearl: That's what I'm asking you. Do you think any of it's valid, or do you think they're making it up? Michael Knowles: Yeah, I think marriage entails risk. But there are ways to mitigate risk. Pearl: I've talked to men that did the exact same thing. They took you guys' advice to a I've seen a lot of stuff from The Daily Wire saying, get married young. And I'll see guys who take that advice, and sometimes it ruins their life. Michael Knowles: Because they get divorced. Pearl: Yeah. And the divorce isn't just that. The woman ruins their reputation, calls him an abuser, says all these awful things. He hasn't seen his kids in two years. And it's the saddest thing when you see a man that's going through a divorce.

Jeff

75,650 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija
1:59

Sensitive content

🦖: I don’t feel anything (about the situation). It all started because of my fan and (the post) said “Why do gay tops like to wear Stussy?”. I felt like teasing them so I said “Because it is cool”. Then some people said “But with this style/appearance, you do not seem like a top”. When I express myself, no matter what I am, it is something that came out of my mouth. So I feel that when there are people who would judge, for example, when you stated, “you are a male”, but there is someone who says, “But you are not a male”. How would you know what that person is? isn’t that right? Regarding the topic of gender and preference in terms of your role during intercourse, it is a private and sensitive matter. Since you are not living with them, you have no reason to judge them on whether they are a top or bottom. I feel that we have no right to judge people on these matters. In 2025, everyone can choose who they want to be and in these times, the world is more open-minded. Anything can happen. This kind of thing is fluid and a very personal matter. 🦖: I feel that when it is a very personal and sensitive thing, there might be a certain group of people who are not be comfortable expressing that they are not straight. Besides not being straight, this also includes having to state their sexual preference or their role during intercourse. It is way beyond that. So I feel that if they are comfortable expressing who they are, but you just feel that their outward appearance does not align with what you think, and then you judge them by saying “But this is not right, this appearance should be a bottom. There is no way.” How would you know? Isn’t that right? OUROAD AT SIAM PARAGON #SiamParagonSummer2025xOUROAD #ต้าห์อู๋ #Daou #Oueiija

𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.

249,277 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce