正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“Trans Terminology explained - language keeps catching up with our understanding” “Non-Binary this one means when someone doesn’t fit neatly into male or female” “Pro-nouns - they’re not politics they’re respect” Dr Helen Webberley speaking - yes she legit clinically insane.

Concerned Citizen

1,129,919 subscribers

40,036 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"If you have a penis, you are NOT a WOMAN" - A phrase that should not need clarifying in 2026, let alone to a grown woman. She asked if I thought she was a danger in the bathroom as she is 'part of the trans community', I fail to see how. From my understanding, to be transgender, a person has to be transitioning from or to one 'gender' to another. A non-binary person is supposedly someone who fits into neither category of male or female, so how are they transgender? Do they even understand their own logic? FULL VIDEO:

"If you have a penis, you are NOT a WOMAN" - A phrase that should not need clarifying in 2026, let alone to a grown woman. She asked if I thought she was a danger in the bathroom as she is 'part of the trans community', I fail to see how. From my understanding, to be transgender, a person has to be transitioning from or to one 'gender' to another. A non-binary person is supposedly someone who fits into neither category of male or female, so how are they transgender? Do they even understand their own logic? FULL VIDEO:

Emma Dunwell

82,069 次观看 • 2 个月前

Piers Morgan Challenges a Non-Binary Guest to Explain Their Identity — The Debate Takes an Awkward Turn Piers Morgan: I just want to ask, what do you mean by non-binary? Non-Binary Guest: When I say I’m non-binary, I’m expressing my identity in a way that I have the right to do. Piers Morgan: What are your pronouns? Non-Binary Guest: They/them. Piers Morgan: What does that mean? The collective “they” has been used to refer to individual people for centuries. Non-Binary Guest: I honestly don’t understand the concept of what non-binary means, or why you would use a plural pronoun to describe a single person. Piers Morgan: If you don’t understand what non-binary means, I’m not sure you’re in a position to lead a debate. Non-Binary Guest: Then tell me. Tell me. Piers Morgan: If you can’t explain it in simple language, what’s the point? Non-Binary Guest: My gender identity is something other than man or woman. I’m a non-binary individual. Piers Morgan: But you accept you’re a female? Non-Binary Guest: I don’t think I’m here to discuss the contents of my underpants. I don’t think that’s appropriate. Piers Morgan: You said, “I’m trans.” Non-Binary Guest: This has really become uncomfortably personal. If you think this is uncomfortable, try undressing in a locker room with a 6-foot-4 naked man. Piers Morgan: Right. Exactly. That’s the point of this. It’s like, what is uncomfortable? Other Guest: I’m having a conversation here, and I’m slightly offended because no one asked me my pronouns. Piers Morgan: Exactly. I think we should get rid of all pronouns. I think they’re ridiculous.

Piers Morgan Challenges a Non-Binary Guest to Explain Their Identity — The Debate Takes an Awkward Turn Piers Morgan: I just want to ask, what do you mean by non-binary? Non-Binary Guest: When I say I’m non-binary, I’m expressing my identity in a way that I have the right to do. Piers Morgan: What are your pronouns? Non-Binary Guest: They/them. Piers Morgan: What does that mean? The collective “they” has been used to refer to individual people for centuries. Non-Binary Guest: I honestly don’t understand the concept of what non-binary means, or why you would use a plural pronoun to describe a single person. Piers Morgan: If you don’t understand what non-binary means, I’m not sure you’re in a position to lead a debate. Non-Binary Guest: Then tell me. Tell me. Piers Morgan: If you can’t explain it in simple language, what’s the point? Non-Binary Guest: My gender identity is something other than man or woman. I’m a non-binary individual. Piers Morgan: But you accept you’re a female? Non-Binary Guest: I don’t think I’m here to discuss the contents of my underpants. I don’t think that’s appropriate. Piers Morgan: You said, “I’m trans.” Non-Binary Guest: This has really become uncomfortably personal. If you think this is uncomfortable, try undressing in a locker room with a 6-foot-4 naked man. Piers Morgan: Right. Exactly. That’s the point of this. It’s like, what is uncomfortable? Other Guest: I’m having a conversation here, and I’m slightly offended because no one asked me my pronouns. Piers Morgan: Exactly. I think we should get rid of all pronouns. I think they’re ridiculous.

Jeff

1,617,118 次观看 • 7 天前

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?

Dr. CZ

98,922 次观看 • 6 个月前

“India is not divided by language on the ground… it is divided by politics on social media.” This video itself proves one simple thing: A Tamil Nadu street vendor came to another state, spoke Hindi normally, interacted with customers, sold food, earned money, and people happily bought from him. No hate. No fight. No force. That’s how real India works. The common Indian understands one thing very clearly: Language is a tool for communication, not a weapon for division. If someone goes to Tamil Nadu and learns a few Tamil words out of respect good. If someone from the South speaks Hindi in North India for business convenience also good. If someone uses English because it connects more customers again normal. This is called practicality and coexistence. But the problem starts when political groups, extremist regionalists, and agenda-driven NGOs turn language into an emotional battlefield for votes, identity politics, and division. One day they say: “HINDI IMPOSITION!” Another day the same people use Hindi or English for: • business • YouTube content • movies • tourism • customer dealing • jobs • social media reach Why? Because market decides communication naturally. Nobody forced this vendor. Nobody attacked him for speaking Hindi. Customers understood → business happened. That is organic India. India has always been multilingual: Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Sanskrit every language is part of Indian civilization. The real civic sense is: “Respect every language, force none.” The moment politicians start telling people: “You are different from them.” “North vs South.” “This language vs that language.” …they create unnecessary poison among people who otherwise live, travel, work, eat, and do business together peacefully every day. A Tamil person working in Delhi, a Punjabi working in Bengaluru, a Marathi businessman in Hyderabad, a North Indian worker in Chennai this is not division. This is India functioning as one nation.

“India is not divided by language on the ground… it is divided by politics on social media.” This video itself proves one simple thing: A Tamil Nadu street vendor came to another state, spoke Hindi normally, interacted with customers, sold food, earned money, and people happily bought from him. No hate. No fight. No force. That’s how real India works. The common Indian understands one thing very clearly: Language is a tool for communication, not a weapon for division. If someone goes to Tamil Nadu and learns a few Tamil words out of respect good. If someone from the South speaks Hindi in North India for business convenience also good. If someone uses English because it connects more customers again normal. This is called practicality and coexistence. But the problem starts when political groups, extremist regionalists, and agenda-driven NGOs turn language into an emotional battlefield for votes, identity politics, and division. One day they say: “HINDI IMPOSITION!” Another day the same people use Hindi or English for: • business • YouTube content • movies • tourism • customer dealing • jobs • social media reach Why? Because market decides communication naturally. Nobody forced this vendor. Nobody attacked him for speaking Hindi. Customers understood → business happened. That is organic India. India has always been multilingual: Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Sanskrit every language is part of Indian civilization. The real civic sense is: “Respect every language, force none.” The moment politicians start telling people: “You are different from them.” “North vs South.” “This language vs that language.” …they create unnecessary poison among people who otherwise live, travel, work, eat, and do business together peacefully every day. A Tamil person working in Delhi, a Punjabi working in Bengaluru, a Marathi businessman in Hyderabad, a North Indian worker in Chennai this is not division. This is India functioning as one nation.

First Witness X

103,534 次观看 • 4 个月前

In an interview talking about medical misogyny Dr Henrietta Hughes talks about 82% of women(in a women’s health strategy survey of 100,000) feeling dismissed & belittled in clinical settings. She then mentions “women & people who have periods”. This woolly language is unhelpful. If you want to include trans men & NB people do a separate survey which focuses on their needs but the issue here is women’s health. Clarity in language is vital in any & all health strategies. EG For learning disabled women or for women in the U.K. for whom English isn’t their first language. I’m not a language purist & I don’t believe in compelled speech, but women need both understanding from professionals and to be able to understand that they’re being prioritised. The third person language of “uterus havers” & “chest feeders” and of “people who menstruate” is failing young people who identify outside of the sex binary and women insulted by it and for whom our biological health and the screening and monitoring of it, is vitally important. It’s also othering for many women. Misogyny means hatred, discrimination & prejudice of & against women & girls, not bigotry against “people”. If you’re highlighting “medical misogyny” I believe you need to be clear who you’re fighting for.

In an interview talking about medical misogyny Dr Henrietta Hughes talks about 82% of women(in a women’s health strategy survey of 100,000) feeling dismissed & belittled in clinical settings. She then mentions “women & people who have periods”. This woolly language is unhelpful. If you want to include trans men & NB people do a separate survey which focuses on their needs but the issue here is women’s health. Clarity in language is vital in any & all health strategies. EG For learning disabled women or for women in the U.K. for whom English isn’t their first language. I’m not a language purist & I don’t believe in compelled speech, but women need both understanding from professionals and to be able to understand that they’re being prioritised. The third person language of “uterus havers” & “chest feeders” and of “people who menstruate” is failing young people who identify outside of the sex binary and women insulted by it and for whom our biological health and the screening and monitoring of it, is vitally important. It’s also othering for many women. Misogyny means hatred, discrimination & prejudice of & against women & girls, not bigotry against “people”. If you’re highlighting “medical misogyny” I believe you need to be clear who you’re fighting for.

Nicky Clark

12,102 次观看 • 1 年前

Jennifer Lopez recently told women they’re “the prize” and that women do more than men. The problem is not confidence, it’s credibility. If a man with four failed marriages and a long list of failed relationships said this, he would be dragged endlessly. There would be no grace, no praise, no “he’s just speaking his truth.” Advice requires results. Experience alone doesn’t qualify someone as a guide. When every relationship ends, including going back to the same man and still ending in divorce, at some point accountability has to replace slogans. The common denominator matters. Telling women they’re inherently better than men doesn’t create healthy relationships. It creates entitlement, contempt, and unrealistic expectations. That mindset doesn’t attract partnership, it repels it. This kind of false empowerment keeps women single, frustrated, and chasing validation instead of building mutual respect. And eventually, when the applause fades and reality sets in, many find themselves thirst-trapping for attention rather than experiencing real intimacy. Confidence is powerful. Superiority is destructive. And no amount of celebrity or applause can replace the truth you see when you finally look in the mirror.

Jennifer Lopez recently told women they’re “the prize” and that women do more than men. The problem is not confidence, it’s credibility. If a man with four failed marriages and a long list of failed relationships said this, he would be dragged endlessly. There would be no grace, no praise, no “he’s just speaking his truth.” Advice requires results. Experience alone doesn’t qualify someone as a guide. When every relationship ends, including going back to the same man and still ending in divorce, at some point accountability has to replace slogans. The common denominator matters. Telling women they’re inherently better than men doesn’t create healthy relationships. It creates entitlement, contempt, and unrealistic expectations. That mindset doesn’t attract partnership, it repels it. This kind of false empowerment keeps women single, frustrated, and chasing validation instead of building mutual respect. And eventually, when the applause fades and reality sets in, many find themselves thirst-trapping for attention rather than experiencing real intimacy. Confidence is powerful. Superiority is destructive. And no amount of celebrity or applause can replace the truth you see when you finally look in the mirror.

Daphne

754,964 次观看 • 9 个月前

GLOW LAB WITH JJJ #CeraVexJanJingjing they’re flirting in front of reporters again 😌 🎤: when jingjing washes her face using cerave, what do you think when you see that, jan? 🦊: well she is pretty! her face looks radiant because of brightening. because it has vitamin c 🎤: then what about when p’jan uses it? 🐯: normally, p’jan tends to be “rawly-seasoned.” raw means that p’jan doesn’t really wear makeup, which she is very pretty when she is “raw” 🦊: not “mild,” “raw”! 🐯: not “mild”! 🦊: not “mild,” “raw” 🐯: do they say “mildly-seasoned”? (i.e., that’s the common way of describing someone wearing light makeup) 🦊: mildly seasoned 555 🐯: she is mildly seasoned 5555 actually, i like when p’jan wears minimal makeup, or bare-faced. she’s pretty already. but when p’jan uses this cerave product, brightening vitamin c cleanser, it increases her skin’s radiance. so she looks even prettier 🎤: besides radiant, is it soft too? 🐯: very soft! 🦊: how do you know? 🐯: (poke) 🦊: hahahah~ 🎤: oh!!! i don’t need to set it up. she does it herself~ 🦊: she does it herself. you don’t need to set her up when the moment comes 🐯: because p’jan’s cheeks are 🥚. yes, boiled egg!

GLOW LAB WITH JJJ #CeraVexJanJingjing they’re flirting in front of reporters again 😌 🎤: when jingjing washes her face using cerave, what do you think when you see that, jan? 🦊: well she is pretty! her face looks radiant because of brightening. because it has vitamin c 🎤: then what about when p’jan uses it? 🐯: normally, p’jan tends to be “rawly-seasoned.” raw means that p’jan doesn’t really wear makeup, which she is very pretty when she is “raw” 🦊: not “mild,” “raw”! 🐯: not “mild”! 🦊: not “mild,” “raw” 🐯: do they say “mildly-seasoned”? (i.e., that’s the common way of describing someone wearing light makeup) 🦊: mildly seasoned 555 🐯: she is mildly seasoned 5555 actually, i like when p’jan wears minimal makeup, or bare-faced. she’s pretty already. but when p’jan uses this cerave product, brightening vitamin c cleanser, it increases her skin’s radiance. so she looks even prettier 🎤: besides radiant, is it soft too? 🐯: very soft! 🦊: how do you know? 🐯: (poke) 🦊: hahahah~ 🎤: oh!!! i don’t need to set it up. she does it herself~ 🦊: she does it herself. you don’t need to set her up when the moment comes 🐯: because p’jan’s cheeks are 🥚. yes, boiled egg!

²²

27,200 次观看 • 1 个月前

I'm a mom of three, and this is a message for every mom in New Jersey. Did you know .Mikie Sherrill opposed the Laken Riley Act — a bill that would have removed criminal illegal migrants from our country? She voted to allow males in female sports and safe spaces. She supports the medical transitioning of minors and opposes parental notification laws, keeping parents completely in the dark. And she supports one of the most extreme laws in the nation — right here in New Jersey — that allows abortions on minors, performed by non-doctors, without parents ever being notified. As a public school educator, I can tell you firsthand that she doesn’t want parents involved in what their children are learning or aware of the materials they’re exposed to in the classroom. That’s not protecting our daughters. That’s not protecting our kids. If you’re a mom, stand with me — and vote for Jack Ciattarelli. Protecting our families starts at the ballot box TOMORROW 🇺🇸

I'm a mom of three, and this is a message for every mom in New Jersey. Did you know .Mikie Sherrill opposed the Laken Riley Act — a bill that would have removed criminal illegal migrants from our country? She voted to allow males in female sports and safe spaces. She supports the medical transitioning of minors and opposes parental notification laws, keeping parents completely in the dark. And she supports one of the most extreme laws in the nation — right here in New Jersey — that allows abortions on minors, performed by non-doctors, without parents ever being notified. As a public school educator, I can tell you firsthand that she doesn’t want parents involved in what their children are learning or aware of the materials they’re exposed to in the classroom. That’s not protecting our daughters. That’s not protecting our kids. If you’re a mom, stand with me — and vote for Jack Ciattarelli. Protecting our families starts at the ballot box TOMORROW 🇺🇸

Dawn Fantasia

121,543 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨Worship Me" — Non-Binary TikToker Demands Pastors Praise Him to Prove LGBT Support🚨 Non-binary TikToker Jeffrey Marsh is making waves with a bold demand: Christian pastors must “worship and praise” him to show they truly support LGBTQI+. And if you see him in public? “You better come up and hug me. You better tell me you like me, you like my videos. You better take a selfie with me.” This isn’t a call for kindness or dialogue. It’s a demand for public affirmation, submission, and performance — turning personal identity into something that requires others to bow. True Christianity doesn’t worship any person. We worship Jesus Christ alone — the same Jesus who showed radical love to sinners while calling all to repentance, truth, and transformation by His grace. Christians are called to love every person made in God’s image, including those who identify as LGBT. That means treating them with dignity and respect. But love is not the same as mandatory praise, compelled speech, or forced selfies on demand. When someone demands pastors (and by extension, believers) publicly “worship” them as proof of acceptance, it crosses into idolatry and coercion. Real love speaks truth in grace — not applause on command. In a free society, no one gets to demand others affirm their ideology or perform emotional labor to prove their “allyship.” What do you think — is this genuine outreach, or something far more demanding? #JeffreyMarsh #TikTokDrama #Christianity #FreeSpeech #TruthInLove #HeIsRisen

🚨Worship Me" — Non-Binary TikToker Demands Pastors Praise Him to Prove LGBT Support🚨 Non-binary TikToker Jeffrey Marsh is making waves with a bold demand: Christian pastors must “worship and praise” him to show they truly support LGBTQI+. And if you see him in public? “You better come up and hug me. You better tell me you like me, you like my videos. You better take a selfie with me.” This isn’t a call for kindness or dialogue. It’s a demand for public affirmation, submission, and performance — turning personal identity into something that requires others to bow. True Christianity doesn’t worship any person. We worship Jesus Christ alone — the same Jesus who showed radical love to sinners while calling all to repentance, truth, and transformation by His grace. Christians are called to love every person made in God’s image, including those who identify as LGBT. That means treating them with dignity and respect. But love is not the same as mandatory praise, compelled speech, or forced selfies on demand. When someone demands pastors (and by extension, believers) publicly “worship” them as proof of acceptance, it crosses into idolatry and coercion. Real love speaks truth in grace — not applause on command. In a free society, no one gets to demand others affirm their ideology or perform emotional labor to prove their “allyship.” What do you think — is this genuine outreach, or something far more demanding? #JeffreyMarsh #TikTokDrama #Christianity #FreeSpeech #TruthInLove #HeIsRisen

Reverend Jordan Wells

11,420 次观看 • 6 个月前

Nick Fuentes exposes the hypocrisy of “principled” conservatives by showing how Ben Shapiro’s support for Trump hinges on a single issue: Israel. “The Trump administration fears the Israel lobby…Why? Because Israelis have independent power.” “Ben Shapiro will not vote for Trump if he doesn’t think Trump is pro-Israel. Think about that…Why is the Republican Party scared of offending Israel and jews? Because Israel and jews have power.” “It’s not just that they have power, but they’re willing to use it for their own interests.” “Honest question: let’s say Trump keeps every single one of his policies, but he doesn’t support Israel. Is Ben Shapiro voting for Trump? Yes or no? We all know the answer is no.” “There’s a lesson in this: take your own side.” “These are our demands. They’re simple. We do not want a war in Iran. We do not want a single net immigrant coming into the country. You work out the details. Otherwise, we’re staying home and you can take your chances. You figure out the f**king math on that.” “We have to use our power…What do we have to lose?”

Nick Fuentes exposes the hypocrisy of “principled” conservatives by showing how Ben Shapiro’s support for Trump hinges on a single issue: Israel. “The Trump administration fears the Israel lobby…Why? Because Israelis have independent power.” “Ben Shapiro will not vote for Trump if he doesn’t think Trump is pro-Israel. Think about that…Why is the Republican Party scared of offending Israel and jews? Because Israel and jews have power.” “It’s not just that they have power, but they’re willing to use it for their own interests.” “Honest question: let’s say Trump keeps every single one of his policies, but he doesn’t support Israel. Is Ben Shapiro voting for Trump? Yes or no? We all know the answer is no.” “There’s a lesson in this: take your own side.” “These are our demands. They’re simple. We do not want a war in Iran. We do not want a single net immigrant coming into the country. You work out the details. Otherwise, we’re staying home and you can take your chances. You figure out the f**king math on that.” “We have to use our power…What do we have to lose?”

Fractured Light

92,749 次观看 • 10 个月前

This week I debated Dr Helen Webberley (she/her), a pro trans doctor who supports transitioning kids, and who runs a clinic that does it. Now Helen’s expanding her clinic to 🇺🇸. What you’re about to see is total lunacy. Here’s our full, uncut debate on transgenderism. Timestamps ⬇️ But first, I have to say, after talking with Helen, I believe that Helen is not only evil but of a significantly inferior intelligence. For a doctor* to not know simple brain science and biology is mind boggling. Her disconnect from reality is both frightening & fascinating. How she talks about Riley Gaines, rape victims, detransitioners and kids is just absolutely vile. I put an asterisk* after "doctor" because number one I don’t think Helen deserves to be called a doctor and #2: After lots of pressure Helen relinquished a license to practice medicine in the UK but Helen still owns GenderGP where the clinic treat kids. Cut & share this interview however you want. 00:00 – Intro - Helen Webberley debate 02:37 – Why is she expanding to the US? 03:38 – Are critics of child transition “bigots”? + Riley Gaines dispute 05:44 – Men in women’s locker rooms 08:09 – “Some women have a penis” and clash over science, consent + language 10:21 – Do trans identities really exist? 12:00 – Is being transracial or trans species really different from transgender? 13:50 – Gender dysphoria vs. changing sex; chromosomes discussion 15:21 – Addressing Detransitioners 18:35 – Brain development for kids who decide to transition, impulse control and more 19:44 – Orgasm, fertility & other side effects 23:55 – Helen claims Robby’s views are harming trans people 🥴🙄 25:36 – Free speech vs. “hate” and should such views be banned? 28:31 – How can a child consent to this? 30:11 – Cass Review discussion and countries restricting or banning transitions for kids 35:16 – Can a Brazilian butt lift be gender affirming care? Where is the line drawn? 36:15 – Helen attempts elitist talking point 38:30 – Helen argues we must validate trans experiences, Robby asks how she applies that to 45 yr old men who identify as 6 years old 42:00 – What a a male/What is a woman? 45:46 – Biological differences and Helen compliments Robby’s appearance… 😳😬 47:34 – Are trans identifying people disadvantaged by society? + social contagions 53:15 – Why does this bother Robby so much? 54:19 – Protecting daughters, bathroom assaults at schools and the bathroom issue 58:10 – Autogynephelia 1:01:43 – How quickly does she believe drugs should be given and how parents should deal with a confused child… 1:05:13 – Argument over conversion therapy 1:07:00 – Debate over World Health Org, “mental illness” classifications, and COVID 1:08:18 – Helen’s stated goal for the US and Robby’s closing critique 1:09:18 – Robby’s final words on risk, evidence, and “protecting kids”

This week I debated Dr Helen Webberley (she/her), a pro trans doctor who supports transitioning kids, and who runs a clinic that does it. Now Helen’s expanding her clinic to 🇺🇸. What you’re about to see is total lunacy. Here’s our full, uncut debate on transgenderism. Timestamps ⬇️ But first, I have to say, after talking with Helen, I believe that Helen is not only evil but of a significantly inferior intelligence. For a doctor* to not know simple brain science and biology is mind boggling. Her disconnect from reality is both frightening & fascinating. How she talks about Riley Gaines, rape victims, detransitioners and kids is just absolutely vile. I put an asterisk* after "doctor" because number one I don’t think Helen deserves to be called a doctor and #2: After lots of pressure Helen relinquished a license to practice medicine in the UK but Helen still owns GenderGP where the clinic treat kids. Cut & share this interview however you want. 00:00 – Intro - Helen Webberley debate 02:37 – Why is she expanding to the US? 03:38 – Are critics of child transition “bigots”? + Riley Gaines dispute 05:44 – Men in women’s locker rooms 08:09 – “Some women have a penis” and clash over science, consent + language 10:21 – Do trans identities really exist? 12:00 – Is being transracial or trans species really different from transgender? 13:50 – Gender dysphoria vs. changing sex; chromosomes discussion 15:21 – Addressing Detransitioners 18:35 – Brain development for kids who decide to transition, impulse control and more 19:44 – Orgasm, fertility & other side effects 23:55 – Helen claims Robby’s views are harming trans people 🥴🙄 25:36 – Free speech vs. “hate” and should such views be banned? 28:31 – How can a child consent to this? 30:11 – Cass Review discussion and countries restricting or banning transitions for kids 35:16 – Can a Brazilian butt lift be gender affirming care? Where is the line drawn? 36:15 – Helen attempts elitist talking point 38:30 – Helen argues we must validate trans experiences, Robby asks how she applies that to 45 yr old men who identify as 6 years old 42:00 – What a a male/What is a woman? 45:46 – Biological differences and Helen compliments Robby’s appearance… 😳😬 47:34 – Are trans identifying people disadvantaged by society? + social contagions 53:15 – Why does this bother Robby so much? 54:19 – Protecting daughters, bathroom assaults at schools and the bathroom issue 58:10 – Autogynephelia 1:01:43 – How quickly does she believe drugs should be given and how parents should deal with a confused child… 1:05:13 – Argument over conversion therapy 1:07:00 – Debate over World Health Org, “mental illness” classifications, and COVID 1:08:18 – Helen’s stated goal for the US and Robby’s closing critique 1:09:18 – Robby’s final words on risk, evidence, and “protecting kids”

Robby Starbuck

824,048 次观看 • 11 个月前

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

Dr.L

4,502,633 次观看 • 5 个月前

Barbara O’Neill explained to Gary Brecka why she believes the body doesn’t need antibiotics or vaccines to stay healthy. “I’m not against antibiotics … but I raised eight children with no antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “And my 25 grandchildren haven’t had antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “I believe in this incredible body with its inbuilt ability to heal itself.” “It's called the immune system.” “And you know our front line of defense is our hydrochloric acid.” “Further down our next line of defense is those microorganisms because they break down, they absorb, they nourish and they protect the inside environment, the blood.” “If something happens to get into the blood, then we've got our internal army, which is our five different white blood cells and the neutrophils, they make up about 65%.” “They engulf, shoot hydrochloric acid into the pathogen and kill it.” “And then they actually die in the process.” “And if there's too much in an area, then it'll come out through the skin as pus, because that's what pus is.” “But if it can be dealt with in the blood, then the monocytes come along, they're the cleanup team.” Barbara Oneill Gary Brecka

Barbara O’Neill explained to Gary Brecka why she believes the body doesn’t need antibiotics or vaccines to stay healthy. “I’m not against antibiotics … but I raised eight children with no antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “And my 25 grandchildren haven’t had antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “I believe in this incredible body with its inbuilt ability to heal itself.” “It's called the immune system.” “And you know our front line of defense is our hydrochloric acid.” “Further down our next line of defense is those microorganisms because they break down, they absorb, they nourish and they protect the inside environment, the blood.” “If something happens to get into the blood, then we've got our internal army, which is our five different white blood cells and the neutrophils, they make up about 65%.” “They engulf, shoot hydrochloric acid into the pathogen and kill it.” “And then they actually die in the process.” “And if there's too much in an area, then it'll come out through the skin as pus, because that's what pus is.” “But if it can be dealt with in the blood, then the monocytes come along, they're the cleanup team.” Barbara Oneill Gary Brecka

Children’s Health Defense

182,782 次观看 • 1 年前

This started like a normal dating story… and turned into something nobody expected! She made a New Year’s resolution: say yes to more dates. No overthinking. No backing out. Just show up and see what happens. So she agrees to a first date with “Matt from Hinge.” At first? Nothing crazy. Just a good date. But then… it keeps going. Second date; better than the first. Third date; now they’re painting together at her place. And suddenly, what started as “just give it a chance” is turning into something real… fast. That’s the part that caught people off guard. Because let’s be honest; most dating stories don’t go like this. Most fade out, get awkward, or never make it past date one. But this? This feels different. It makes you wonder… Is this what happens when you actually give people a real chance instead of overthinking everything? Or is this just one of those rare situations that actually works out? Be honest; do you think saying “yes” more often could actually change your dating life… or would it just lead to more bad dates? And how soon is TOO soon for things to start getting serious?

This started like a normal dating story… and turned into something nobody expected! She made a New Year’s resolution: say yes to more dates. No overthinking. No backing out. Just show up and see what happens. So she agrees to a first date with “Matt from Hinge.” At first? Nothing crazy. Just a good date. But then… it keeps going. Second date; better than the first. Third date; now they’re painting together at her place. And suddenly, what started as “just give it a chance” is turning into something real… fast. That’s the part that caught people off guard. Because let’s be honest; most dating stories don’t go like this. Most fade out, get awkward, or never make it past date one. But this? This feels different. It makes you wonder… Is this what happens when you actually give people a real chance instead of overthinking everything? Or is this just one of those rare situations that actually works out? Be honest; do you think saying “yes” more often could actually change your dating life… or would it just lead to more bad dates? And how soon is TOO soon for things to start getting serious?

Dr.L

2,024,806 次观看 • 6 个月前

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Teddy - PolyBackTest.com

366,617 次观看 • 4 个月前

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,036,533 次观看 • 5 个月前

There’s a language that exists between a horse and the person who truly sees them. It doesn’t need words. It shows up in the way a horse softens its eye when that one human walks into the pasture… in the quiet decision to follow without a lead rope… in the way they lean their weight against you like they’re saying, “I’ve got you too.” Horses don’t give that kind of trust lightly. They remember how you move, how you speak, how safe (or unsafe) you make them feel. When they choose you, it’s not performance. It’s recognition. In a world that moves too fast and talks too loud, these moments feel sacred. A massive, powerful animal willingly offering gentleness. A human learning to slow down enough to deserve it. This isn’t just “horses being cute.” This is relationship. This is mutual respect earned over time. This is what it looks like when two very different beings decide they belong to each other. Some of the purest love stories never need a single word spoken. Tag the person who has this kind of bond with a horse… or the one who still dreams of it.

There’s a language that exists between a horse and the person who truly sees them. It doesn’t need words. It shows up in the way a horse softens its eye when that one human walks into the pasture… in the quiet decision to follow without a lead rope… in the way they lean their weight against you like they’re saying, “I’ve got you too.” Horses don’t give that kind of trust lightly. They remember how you move, how you speak, how safe (or unsafe) you make them feel. When they choose you, it’s not performance. It’s recognition. In a world that moves too fast and talks too loud, these moments feel sacred. A massive, powerful animal willingly offering gentleness. A human learning to slow down enough to deserve it. This isn’t just “horses being cute.” This is relationship. This is mutual respect earned over time. This is what it looks like when two very different beings decide they belong to each other. Some of the purest love stories never need a single word spoken. Tag the person who has this kind of bond with a horse… or the one who still dreams of it.

NancyH

17,517 次观看 • 2 个月前

Caitlyn Jenner gets respect from a lot of people for a simple reason: she says the quiet part out loud, and she says it as someone who actually transitioned. She won Olympic gold in the men’s decathlon in 1976. In 2015 she came out as a transgender woman. She didn’t then pretend biology disappeared. She has said, in her own words, that she is still genetically male — XY — and that nothing she did changed that. She has also said she declined women’s golf events because she could still outdrive the field. That is not a pundit talking. That is someone applying the same standard to herself. Her line has been consistent for years: live how you want, use the name and pronouns you want, but men’s bodies after male puberty do not belong in the women’s category. “It’s biology, it is not about exclusion or not being tolerant,” she posted. “Someone trans has to do it. Men don’t belong in women’s sports. Period.” She keeps coming back to Title IX — the law that built women’s sports — and to the idea that if you let XY into XX categories, you slowly erase the point of having a women’s category at all. That is why people who disagree with activist orthodoxy like her. Most public figures in her position either stay silent or repeat the script. Jenner does neither. She treats fairness in sport as more important than being applauded by every activist org. She backed local bans, praised the IOC’s move toward SRY-gene screening for female events, and called the WNBA’s hedging hypocrisy: “XX you’re in. XY you’re out. It’s that simple.” Critics call that a contradiction. She has even joked about the tension herself, including returning a “Woman of the Year” honor while arguing biological males should stay out of women’s competition. Whether you find that brave or inconsistent, it is not evasive. She is not asking the world to deny she transitioned. She is asking it not to deny sex when trophies, scholarships, and locker rooms are on the line. That combination of personal experience plus an unwillingness to lie about male advantage is why a lot of people respect her even when they don’t agree with everything else she says. She is not performing solidarity. She is drawing a line she thinks women’s sports cannot survive without.

Caitlyn Jenner gets respect from a lot of people for a simple reason: she says the quiet part out loud, and she says it as someone who actually transitioned. She won Olympic gold in the men’s decathlon in 1976. In 2015 she came out as a transgender woman. She didn’t then pretend biology disappeared. She has said, in her own words, that she is still genetically male — XY — and that nothing she did changed that. She has also said she declined women’s golf events because she could still outdrive the field. That is not a pundit talking. That is someone applying the same standard to herself. Her line has been consistent for years: live how you want, use the name and pronouns you want, but men’s bodies after male puberty do not belong in the women’s category. “It’s biology, it is not about exclusion or not being tolerant,” she posted. “Someone trans has to do it. Men don’t belong in women’s sports. Period.” She keeps coming back to Title IX — the law that built women’s sports — and to the idea that if you let XY into XX categories, you slowly erase the point of having a women’s category at all. That is why people who disagree with activist orthodoxy like her. Most public figures in her position either stay silent or repeat the script. Jenner does neither. She treats fairness in sport as more important than being applauded by every activist org. She backed local bans, praised the IOC’s move toward SRY-gene screening for female events, and called the WNBA’s hedging hypocrisy: “XX you’re in. XY you’re out. It’s that simple.” Critics call that a contradiction. She has even joked about the tension herself, including returning a “Woman of the Year” honor while arguing biological males should stay out of women’s competition. Whether you find that brave or inconsistent, it is not evasive. She is not asking the world to deny she transitioned. She is asking it not to deny sex when trophies, scholarships, and locker rooms are on the line. That combination of personal experience plus an unwillingness to lie about male advantage is why a lot of people respect her even when they don’t agree with everything else she says. She is not performing solidarity. She is drawing a line she thinks women’s sports cannot survive without.

Girl patriot 🙏 🇺🇸 🦅

82,830 次观看 • 1 个月前