Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Trans Terminology explained - language keeps catching up with our understanding” “Non-Binary this one means when someone doesn’t fit neatly into male or female” “Pro-nouns - they’re not politics they’re respect” Dr Helen Webberley speaking - yes she legit clinically insane.

Concerned Citizen

1,129,919 subscribers

40,036 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"If you have a penis, you are NOT a WOMAN" - A phrase that should not need clarifying in 2026, let alone to a grown woman. She asked if I thought she was a danger in the bathroom as she is 'part of the trans community', I fail to see how. From my understanding, to be transgender, a person has to be transitioning from or to one 'gender' to another. A non-binary person is supposedly someone who fits into neither category of male or female, so how are they transgender? Do they even understand their own logic? FULL VIDEO:

"If you have a penis, you are NOT a WOMAN" - A phrase that should not need clarifying in 2026, let alone to a grown woman. She asked if I thought she was a danger in the bathroom as she is 'part of the trans community', I fail to see how. From my understanding, to be transgender, a person has to be transitioning from or to one 'gender' to another. A non-binary person is supposedly someone who fits into neither category of male or female, so how are they transgender? Do they even understand their own logic? FULL VIDEO:

Emma Dunwell

81,596 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?

This is EXACTLY why people are DONE with Facebook Marketplace… 📦 She listed a desk for $40. That’s it. Simple. But what followed? Absolute chaos. Her phone starts blowing up “Is this available?” (still up = yes) “What are the dimensions?” (already in the post) “How much?” (…it literally says $40) Then at 4;30 A.M., someone messages: “I’ll pick it up later today.” So she gets everything ready. Cleans it. Moves it. Waits around all day. And then… nothing. Not a message. Not a heads up. Not even a “sorry.” One day passes… then TWO. Still nothing. Just completely ghosted. That’s the part that drives people insane, it’s not even about selling anymore, it’s about people wasting your time like it means nothing. At this point, “$40” turns into hours of frustration. Be real, what’s worse: the nonstop dumb questions, or the people who swear they’re coming and disappear? And how long would YOU wait before blocking them?

Dr. CZ

98,922 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Jennifer Lopez recently told women they’re “the prize” and that women do more than men. The problem is not confidence, it’s credibility. If a man with four failed marriages and a long list of failed relationships said this, he would be dragged endlessly. There would be no grace, no praise, no “he’s just speaking his truth.” Advice requires results. Experience alone doesn’t qualify someone as a guide. When every relationship ends, including going back to the same man and still ending in divorce, at some point accountability has to replace slogans. The common denominator matters. Telling women they’re inherently better than men doesn’t create healthy relationships. It creates entitlement, contempt, and unrealistic expectations. That mindset doesn’t attract partnership, it repels it. This kind of false empowerment keeps women single, frustrated, and chasing validation instead of building mutual respect. And eventually, when the applause fades and reality sets in, many find themselves thirst-trapping for attention rather than experiencing real intimacy. Confidence is powerful. Superiority is destructive. And no amount of celebrity or applause can replace the truth you see when you finally look in the mirror.

Jennifer Lopez recently told women they’re “the prize” and that women do more than men. The problem is not confidence, it’s credibility. If a man with four failed marriages and a long list of failed relationships said this, he would be dragged endlessly. There would be no grace, no praise, no “he’s just speaking his truth.” Advice requires results. Experience alone doesn’t qualify someone as a guide. When every relationship ends, including going back to the same man and still ending in divorce, at some point accountability has to replace slogans. The common denominator matters. Telling women they’re inherently better than men doesn’t create healthy relationships. It creates entitlement, contempt, and unrealistic expectations. That mindset doesn’t attract partnership, it repels it. This kind of false empowerment keeps women single, frustrated, and chasing validation instead of building mutual respect. And eventually, when the applause fades and reality sets in, many find themselves thirst-trapping for attention rather than experiencing real intimacy. Confidence is powerful. Superiority is destructive. And no amount of celebrity or applause can replace the truth you see when you finally look in the mirror.

Daphne

754,530 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

In an interview talking about medical misogyny Dr Henrietta Hughes talks about 82% of women(in a women’s health strategy survey of 100,000) feeling dismissed & belittled in clinical settings. She then mentions “women & people who have periods”. This woolly language is unhelpful. If you want to include trans men & NB people do a separate survey which focuses on their needs but the issue here is women’s health. Clarity in language is vital in any & all health strategies. EG For learning disabled women or for women in the U.K. for whom English isn’t their first language. I’m not a language purist & I don’t believe in compelled speech, but women need both understanding from professionals and to be able to understand that they’re being prioritised. The third person language of “uterus havers” & “chest feeders” and of “people who menstruate” is failing young people who identify outside of the sex binary and women insulted by it and for whom our biological health and the screening and monitoring of it, is vitally important. It’s also othering for many women. Misogyny means hatred, discrimination & prejudice of & against women & girls, not bigotry against “people”. If you’re highlighting “medical misogyny” I believe you need to be clear who you’re fighting for.

In an interview talking about medical misogyny Dr Henrietta Hughes talks about 82% of women(in a women’s health strategy survey of 100,000) feeling dismissed & belittled in clinical settings. She then mentions “women & people who have periods”. This woolly language is unhelpful. If you want to include trans men & NB people do a separate survey which focuses on their needs but the issue here is women’s health. Clarity in language is vital in any & all health strategies. EG For learning disabled women or for women in the U.K. for whom English isn’t their first language. I’m not a language purist & I don’t believe in compelled speech, but women need both understanding from professionals and to be able to understand that they’re being prioritised. The third person language of “uterus havers” & “chest feeders” and of “people who menstruate” is failing young people who identify outside of the sex binary and women insulted by it and for whom our biological health and the screening and monitoring of it, is vitally important. It’s also othering for many women. Misogyny means hatred, discrimination & prejudice of & against women & girls, not bigotry against “people”. If you’re highlighting “medical misogyny” I believe you need to be clear who you’re fighting for.

Nicky Clark

12,075 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“India is not divided by language on the ground… it is divided by politics on social media.” This video itself proves one simple thing: A Tamil Nadu street vendor came to another state, spoke Hindi normally, interacted with customers, sold food, earned money, and people happily bought from him. No hate. No fight. No force. That’s how real India works. The common Indian understands one thing very clearly: Language is a tool for communication, not a weapon for division. If someone goes to Tamil Nadu and learns a few Tamil words out of respect good. If someone from the South speaks Hindi in North India for business convenience also good. If someone uses English because it connects more customers again normal. This is called practicality and coexistence. But the problem starts when political groups, extremist regionalists, and agenda-driven NGOs turn language into an emotional battlefield for votes, identity politics, and division. One day they say: “HINDI IMPOSITION!” Another day the same people use Hindi or English for: • business • YouTube content • movies • tourism • customer dealing • jobs • social media reach Why? Because market decides communication naturally. Nobody forced this vendor. Nobody attacked him for speaking Hindi. Customers understood → business happened. That is organic India. India has always been multilingual: Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Sanskrit every language is part of Indian civilization. The real civic sense is: “Respect every language, force none.” The moment politicians start telling people: “You are different from them.” “North vs South.” “This language vs that language.” …they create unnecessary poison among people who otherwise live, travel, work, eat, and do business together peacefully every day. A Tamil person working in Delhi, a Punjabi working in Bengaluru, a Marathi businessman in Hyderabad, a North Indian worker in Chennai this is not division. This is India functioning as one nation.

“India is not divided by language on the ground… it is divided by politics on social media.” This video itself proves one simple thing: A Tamil Nadu street vendor came to another state, spoke Hindi normally, interacted with customers, sold food, earned money, and people happily bought from him. No hate. No fight. No force. That’s how real India works. The common Indian understands one thing very clearly: Language is a tool for communication, not a weapon for division. If someone goes to Tamil Nadu and learns a few Tamil words out of respect good. If someone from the South speaks Hindi in North India for business convenience also good. If someone uses English because it connects more customers again normal. This is called practicality and coexistence. But the problem starts when political groups, extremist regionalists, and agenda-driven NGOs turn language into an emotional battlefield for votes, identity politics, and division. One day they say: “HINDI IMPOSITION!” Another day the same people use Hindi or English for: • business • YouTube content • movies • tourism • customer dealing • jobs • social media reach Why? Because market decides communication naturally. Nobody forced this vendor. Nobody attacked him for speaking Hindi. Customers understood → business happened. That is organic India. India has always been multilingual: Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Sanskrit every language is part of Indian civilization. The real civic sense is: “Respect every language, force none.” The moment politicians start telling people: “You are different from them.” “North vs South.” “This language vs that language.” …they create unnecessary poison among people who otherwise live, travel, work, eat, and do business together peacefully every day. A Tamil person working in Delhi, a Punjabi working in Bengaluru, a Marathi businessman in Hyderabad, a North Indian worker in Chennai this is not division. This is India functioning as one nation.

First Witness X

103,534 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I'm a mom of three, and this is a message for every mom in New Jersey. Did you know .Mikie Sherrill opposed the Laken Riley Act — a bill that would have removed criminal illegal migrants from our country? She voted to allow males in female sports and safe spaces. She supports the medical transitioning of minors and opposes parental notification laws, keeping parents completely in the dark. And she supports one of the most extreme laws in the nation — right here in New Jersey — that allows abortions on minors, performed by non-doctors, without parents ever being notified. As a public school educator, I can tell you firsthand that she doesn’t want parents involved in what their children are learning or aware of the materials they’re exposed to in the classroom. That’s not protecting our daughters. That’s not protecting our kids. If you’re a mom, stand with me — and vote for Jack Ciattarelli. Protecting our families starts at the ballot box TOMORROW 🇺🇸

I'm a mom of three, and this is a message for every mom in New Jersey. Did you know .Mikie Sherrill opposed the Laken Riley Act — a bill that would have removed criminal illegal migrants from our country? She voted to allow males in female sports and safe spaces. She supports the medical transitioning of minors and opposes parental notification laws, keeping parents completely in the dark. And she supports one of the most extreme laws in the nation — right here in New Jersey — that allows abortions on minors, performed by non-doctors, without parents ever being notified. As a public school educator, I can tell you firsthand that she doesn’t want parents involved in what their children are learning or aware of the materials they’re exposed to in the classroom. That’s not protecting our daughters. That’s not protecting our kids. If you’re a mom, stand with me — and vote for Jack Ciattarelli. Protecting our families starts at the ballot box TOMORROW 🇺🇸

Dawn Fantasia

121,509 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨Worship Me" — Non-Binary TikToker Demands Pastors Praise Him to Prove LGBT Support🚨 Non-binary TikToker Jeffrey Marsh is making waves with a bold demand: Christian pastors must “worship and praise” him to show they truly support LGBTQI+. And if you see him in public? “You better come up and hug me. You better tell me you like me, you like my videos. You better take a selfie with me.” This isn’t a call for kindness or dialogue. It’s a demand for public affirmation, submission, and performance — turning personal identity into something that requires others to bow. True Christianity doesn’t worship any person. We worship Jesus Christ alone — the same Jesus who showed radical love to sinners while calling all to repentance, truth, and transformation by His grace. Christians are called to love every person made in God’s image, including those who identify as LGBT. That means treating them with dignity and respect. But love is not the same as mandatory praise, compelled speech, or forced selfies on demand. When someone demands pastors (and by extension, believers) publicly “worship” them as proof of acceptance, it crosses into idolatry and coercion. Real love speaks truth in grace — not applause on command. In a free society, no one gets to demand others affirm their ideology or perform emotional labor to prove their “allyship.” What do you think — is this genuine outreach, or something far more demanding? #JeffreyMarsh #TikTokDrama #Christianity #FreeSpeech #TruthInLove #HeIsRisen

🚨Worship Me" — Non-Binary TikToker Demands Pastors Praise Him to Prove LGBT Support🚨 Non-binary TikToker Jeffrey Marsh is making waves with a bold demand: Christian pastors must “worship and praise” him to show they truly support LGBTQI+. And if you see him in public? “You better come up and hug me. You better tell me you like me, you like my videos. You better take a selfie with me.” This isn’t a call for kindness or dialogue. It’s a demand for public affirmation, submission, and performance — turning personal identity into something that requires others to bow. True Christianity doesn’t worship any person. We worship Jesus Christ alone — the same Jesus who showed radical love to sinners while calling all to repentance, truth, and transformation by His grace. Christians are called to love every person made in God’s image, including those who identify as LGBT. That means treating them with dignity and respect. But love is not the same as mandatory praise, compelled speech, or forced selfies on demand. When someone demands pastors (and by extension, believers) publicly “worship” them as proof of acceptance, it crosses into idolatry and coercion. Real love speaks truth in grace — not applause on command. In a free society, no one gets to demand others affirm their ideology or perform emotional labor to prove their “allyship.” What do you think — is this genuine outreach, or something far more demanding? #JeffreyMarsh #TikTokDrama #Christianity #FreeSpeech #TruthInLove #HeIsRisen

Reverend Jordan Wells

11,420 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Nick Fuentes exposes the hypocrisy of “principled” conservatives by showing how Ben Shapiro’s support for Trump hinges on a single issue: Israel. “The Trump administration fears the Israel lobby…Why? Because Israelis have independent power.” “Ben Shapiro will not vote for Trump if he doesn’t think Trump is pro-Israel. Think about that…Why is the Republican Party scared of offending Israel and jews? Because Israel and jews have power.” “It’s not just that they have power, but they’re willing to use it for their own interests.” “Honest question: let’s say Trump keeps every single one of his policies, but he doesn’t support Israel. Is Ben Shapiro voting for Trump? Yes or no? We all know the answer is no.” “There’s a lesson in this: take your own side.” “These are our demands. They’re simple. We do not want a war in Iran. We do not want a single net immigrant coming into the country. You work out the details. Otherwise, we’re staying home and you can take your chances. You figure out the f**king math on that.” “We have to use our power…What do we have to lose?”

Nick Fuentes exposes the hypocrisy of “principled” conservatives by showing how Ben Shapiro’s support for Trump hinges on a single issue: Israel. “The Trump administration fears the Israel lobby…Why? Because Israelis have independent power.” “Ben Shapiro will not vote for Trump if he doesn’t think Trump is pro-Israel. Think about that…Why is the Republican Party scared of offending Israel and jews? Because Israel and jews have power.” “It’s not just that they have power, but they’re willing to use it for their own interests.” “Honest question: let’s say Trump keeps every single one of his policies, but he doesn’t support Israel. Is Ben Shapiro voting for Trump? Yes or no? We all know the answer is no.” “There’s a lesson in this: take your own side.” “These are our demands. They’re simple. We do not want a war in Iran. We do not want a single net immigrant coming into the country. You work out the details. Otherwise, we’re staying home and you can take your chances. You figure out the f**king math on that.” “We have to use our power…What do we have to lose?”

Fractured Light

92,749 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

A woman gets a call from a hospital saying her husband has been admitted. Confused, she tells them she doesn’t have a husband anymore. The staff insists; she’s listed as the emergency contact. It turns out to be her ex-husband. Reluctantly, she goes to the hospital, but refuses to see him at first. The staff keeps pushing until she finally agrees. When she walks into the room, he’s calm, kind… completely different from the man she divorced. A doctor pulls her aside and explains: he has amnesia and doesn’t remember the last two years; no fights, no separation, no divorce. In his mind, they’re still happily married. The doctor says it’s important not to force memories back and suggests she take him home, letting him recover naturally. This is one of those situations where emotion, ethics, and personal boundaries collide. On one hand, there’s compassion; someone vulnerable, confused, and depending on a familiar face. On the other, there’s history, pain, and a relationship that ended for a reason. Just because he forgot doesn’t mean she should have to. Would you step back into that role temporarily to help someone heal… or protect your peace and keep the past where it belongs?

Dr.L

4,501,323 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This week I debated Dr Helen Webberley (she/her), a pro trans doctor who supports transitioning kids, and who runs a clinic that does it. Now Helen’s expanding her clinic to 🇺🇸. What you’re about to see is total lunacy. Here’s our full, uncut debate on transgenderism. Timestamps ⬇️ But first, I have to say, after talking with Helen, I believe that Helen is not only evil but of a significantly inferior intelligence. For a doctor* to not know simple brain science and biology is mind boggling. Her disconnect from reality is both frightening & fascinating. How she talks about Riley Gaines, rape victims, detransitioners and kids is just absolutely vile. I put an asterisk* after "doctor" because number one I don’t think Helen deserves to be called a doctor and #2: After lots of pressure Helen relinquished a license to practice medicine in the UK but Helen still owns GenderGP where the clinic treat kids. Cut & share this interview however you want. 00:00 – Intro - Helen Webberley debate 02:37 – Why is she expanding to the US? 03:38 – Are critics of child transition “bigots”? + Riley Gaines dispute 05:44 – Men in women’s locker rooms 08:09 – “Some women have a penis” and clash over science, consent + language 10:21 – Do trans identities really exist? 12:00 – Is being transracial or trans species really different from transgender? 13:50 – Gender dysphoria vs. changing sex; chromosomes discussion 15:21 – Addressing Detransitioners 18:35 – Brain development for kids who decide to transition, impulse control and more 19:44 – Orgasm, fertility & other side effects 23:55 – Helen claims Robby’s views are harming trans people 🥴🙄 25:36 – Free speech vs. “hate” and should such views be banned? 28:31 – How can a child consent to this? 30:11 – Cass Review discussion and countries restricting or banning transitions for kids 35:16 – Can a Brazilian butt lift be gender affirming care? Where is the line drawn? 36:15 – Helen attempts elitist talking point 38:30 – Helen argues we must validate trans experiences, Robby asks how she applies that to 45 yr old men who identify as 6 years old 42:00 – What a a male/What is a woman? 45:46 – Biological differences and Helen compliments Robby’s appearance… 😳😬 47:34 – Are trans identifying people disadvantaged by society? + social contagions 53:15 – Why does this bother Robby so much? 54:19 – Protecting daughters, bathroom assaults at schools and the bathroom issue 58:10 – Autogynephelia 1:01:43 – How quickly does she believe drugs should be given and how parents should deal with a confused child… 1:05:13 – Argument over conversion therapy 1:07:00 – Debate over World Health Org, “mental illness” classifications, and COVID 1:08:18 – Helen’s stated goal for the US and Robby’s closing critique 1:09:18 – Robby’s final words on risk, evidence, and “protecting kids”

This week I debated Dr Helen Webberley (she/her), a pro trans doctor who supports transitioning kids, and who runs a clinic that does it. Now Helen’s expanding her clinic to 🇺🇸. What you’re about to see is total lunacy. Here’s our full, uncut debate on transgenderism. Timestamps ⬇️ But first, I have to say, after talking with Helen, I believe that Helen is not only evil but of a significantly inferior intelligence. For a doctor* to not know simple brain science and biology is mind boggling. Her disconnect from reality is both frightening & fascinating. How she talks about Riley Gaines, rape victims, detransitioners and kids is just absolutely vile. I put an asterisk* after "doctor" because number one I don’t think Helen deserves to be called a doctor and #2: After lots of pressure Helen relinquished a license to practice medicine in the UK but Helen still owns GenderGP where the clinic treat kids. Cut & share this interview however you want. 00:00 – Intro - Helen Webberley debate 02:37 – Why is she expanding to the US? 03:38 – Are critics of child transition “bigots”? + Riley Gaines dispute 05:44 – Men in women’s locker rooms 08:09 – “Some women have a penis” and clash over science, consent + language 10:21 – Do trans identities really exist? 12:00 – Is being transracial or trans species really different from transgender? 13:50 – Gender dysphoria vs. changing sex; chromosomes discussion 15:21 – Addressing Detransitioners 18:35 – Brain development for kids who decide to transition, impulse control and more 19:44 – Orgasm, fertility & other side effects 23:55 – Helen claims Robby’s views are harming trans people 🥴🙄 25:36 – Free speech vs. “hate” and should such views be banned? 28:31 – How can a child consent to this? 30:11 – Cass Review discussion and countries restricting or banning transitions for kids 35:16 – Can a Brazilian butt lift be gender affirming care? Where is the line drawn? 36:15 – Helen attempts elitist talking point 38:30 – Helen argues we must validate trans experiences, Robby asks how she applies that to 45 yr old men who identify as 6 years old 42:00 – What a a male/What is a woman? 45:46 – Biological differences and Helen compliments Robby’s appearance… 😳😬 47:34 – Are trans identifying people disadvantaged by society? + social contagions 53:15 – Why does this bother Robby so much? 54:19 – Protecting daughters, bathroom assaults at schools and the bathroom issue 58:10 – Autogynephelia 1:01:43 – How quickly does she believe drugs should be given and how parents should deal with a confused child… 1:05:13 – Argument over conversion therapy 1:07:00 – Debate over World Health Org, “mental illness” classifications, and COVID 1:08:18 – Helen’s stated goal for the US and Robby’s closing critique 1:09:18 – Robby’s final words on risk, evidence, and “protecting kids”

Robby Starbuck

822,754 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Barbara O’Neill explained to Gary Brecka why she believes the body doesn’t need antibiotics or vaccines to stay healthy. “I’m not against antibiotics … but I raised eight children with no antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “And my 25 grandchildren haven’t had antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “I believe in this incredible body with its inbuilt ability to heal itself.” “It's called the immune system.” “And you know our front line of defense is our hydrochloric acid.” “Further down our next line of defense is those microorganisms because they break down, they absorb, they nourish and they protect the inside environment, the blood.” “If something happens to get into the blood, then we've got our internal army, which is our five different white blood cells and the neutrophils, they make up about 65%.” “They engulf, shoot hydrochloric acid into the pathogen and kill it.” “And then they actually die in the process.” “And if there's too much in an area, then it'll come out through the skin as pus, because that's what pus is.” “But if it can be dealt with in the blood, then the monocytes come along, they're the cleanup team.” Barbara Oneill Gary Brecka

Barbara O’Neill explained to Gary Brecka why she believes the body doesn’t need antibiotics or vaccines to stay healthy. “I’m not against antibiotics … but I raised eight children with no antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “And my 25 grandchildren haven’t had antibiotics and they’re all still alive.” “I believe in this incredible body with its inbuilt ability to heal itself.” “It's called the immune system.” “And you know our front line of defense is our hydrochloric acid.” “Further down our next line of defense is those microorganisms because they break down, they absorb, they nourish and they protect the inside environment, the blood.” “If something happens to get into the blood, then we've got our internal army, which is our five different white blood cells and the neutrophils, they make up about 65%.” “They engulf, shoot hydrochloric acid into the pathogen and kill it.” “And then they actually die in the process.” “And if there's too much in an area, then it'll come out through the skin as pus, because that's what pus is.” “But if it can be dealt with in the blood, then the monocytes come along, they're the cleanup team.” Barbara Oneill Gary Brecka

Children’s Health Defense

182,450 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Teddy - PolyBackTest.com

366,478 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This started like a normal dating story… and turned into something nobody expected! She made a New Year’s resolution: say yes to more dates. No overthinking. No backing out. Just show up and see what happens. So she agrees to a first date with “Matt from Hinge.” At first? Nothing crazy. Just a good date. But then… it keeps going. Second date; better than the first. Third date; now they’re painting together at her place. And suddenly, what started as “just give it a chance” is turning into something real… fast. That’s the part that caught people off guard. Because let’s be honest; most dating stories don’t go like this. Most fade out, get awkward, or never make it past date one. But this? This feels different. It makes you wonder… Is this what happens when you actually give people a real chance instead of overthinking everything? Or is this just one of those rare situations that actually works out? Be honest; do you think saying “yes” more often could actually change your dating life… or would it just lead to more bad dates? And how soon is TOO soon for things to start getting serious?

This started like a normal dating story… and turned into something nobody expected! She made a New Year’s resolution: say yes to more dates. No overthinking. No backing out. Just show up and see what happens. So she agrees to a first date with “Matt from Hinge.” At first? Nothing crazy. Just a good date. But then… it keeps going. Second date; better than the first. Third date; now they’re painting together at her place. And suddenly, what started as “just give it a chance” is turning into something real… fast. That’s the part that caught people off guard. Because let’s be honest; most dating stories don’t go like this. Most fade out, get awkward, or never make it past date one. But this? This feels different. It makes you wonder… Is this what happens when you actually give people a real chance instead of overthinking everything? Or is this just one of those rare situations that actually works out? Be honest; do you think saying “yes” more often could actually change your dating life… or would it just lead to more bad dates? And how soon is TOO soon for things to start getting serious?

Dr.L

2,023,517 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

Bill Maher drags his woke guest out of his liberal bubble and tells him to his face he’s why Kamala Harris lost. It all started when David Cross revealed his 9-year-old daughter has “trans friends.” “Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” Maher asked. Cross replied: “Yep,” as if it’s completely normal and something society should embrace. That’s when Maher dropped the hammer and told him straight up that no, somebody’s doing something to that little girl. Cross immediately got defensive, but Maher refused to back down. He told Cross that believing a 9-year-old girl is deciding to be trans on her own is exactly the kind of liberal insanity that lost Kamala Harris the election in 2024. And if Democrats keep it up, JD Vance is going to win in 2028. By the end of this exchange, Cross is left sitting there looking like a deer in headlights, like he’s never been challenged on “trans kids” in his life. This is a moment worth watching, but if you’re somewhere you can’t play it, the transcript is below: MAHER: “You need to be checked. People need to be checked… including your little girl.” CROSS: “Fck that btch. (joking) Fck that little btch with her black friends and trans friends and not even understanding.” MAHER: “Trans?! Wait, she has trans friends in third grade?” CROSS: “Yep.” MAHER: “They know they’re trans in third grade?” CROSS: “Just the coolest kid.” MAHER: “[Is kid transitioning from] girl to boy?” CROSS: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at three years old.” MAHER: “A woman said [to me] ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” CROSS: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” MAHER: “Well, I don’t know.” CROSS: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” MAHER: “How old?” CROSS: “She is — or HE is — either eight or I think nine.” MAHER: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because eight or nine-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” CROSS: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “Well then, they’re doing something.” CROSS: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” MAHER: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” CROSS: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [them].” MAHER: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” CROSS: “You know you knew you weren’t gay, right?” MAHER: “Yeah, that’s different.” CROSS: “It’s not different.” MAHER: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.” CROSS: “Wait, what?” MAHER: “We voted for the same person…” CROSS: “Right.” MAHER: “You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. Eight-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,026,420 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

⛔️🏳️‍⚧️ Trans’ GREATEST Weakness 🏳️‍⚧️⛔️ ———————- Okay, everyone, let’s see why trans people screech like demented hyenas when you ask, “WHAT IS A WOMAN?” They call the question irrelevant, nonsensical, and they think that they can wave it off with shouting, bullying and accusing everyone of transphobia and bigotry, but, why does it bug them? Because it forces them to face reality, not their fantasy. It exposes their “identity” belief as a lie, and, If it’s so meaningless, why do they lose their minds defending it? Their reason: “I feel like a woman, so I’m a real one,” as if emotions trump facts. That’s moronic, feeling like a pilot doesn’t let you fly a plane. Their “gender identity” is a fairy tale, if it’s all vibes, why do 80% of trans women keep their junk, per a 2023 UCLA study? When you ask them: “What does feeling like a woman means or entails?” they spew drivel like: “It’s an inner vibe,” or “It’s not about genitals, it’s my identity” or “Womanhood is who I am, not my body” Or “My body’s wrong,” or just other gibberish. That’s ONLY stereotypes, feelings or dysphoria, NOT A DEFINITION. They claim it’s a “social construct,” or “biology’s too complex,” citing intersex cases. But that is just cum-farts, because, intersex is 0.02-1.7% of people, per 2023 medical data, it doesn’t erase the 99.98% male-female binary. Moreover, their 2018 Nature brain scans, claiming trans brains mimic women’s are shaky studies show no proof feelings override DNA, just wishful thinking from tiny samples. They say we’re “evolving” to accept men as women, women as men, like biology’s a suggestion. What a crock, evolution doesn’t rewrite DNA because of your skirt fetish, you’re not rewriting humanity, you’re just loud about it. Meanwhile, those biologically born women who support trans nonsense are pathetic, spineless sellouts, drunk on woke clout, sob stories, ditching reason. Their “be kind, accept identity” line’s a joke, kindness doesn’t rewrite science, you’re enabling a delusion that erases your own biology, wake up, morons. If trans people answer to “what is a woman?” is how you feel and what you identify with, fine, believe that, but they don’t get to shove it down everyone’s throats, bully, attack, insult anyone who disagrees, misgenders, skips their pronouns, flinging “bigot,” “transphobia” like herpes at a frat party. Disagreement isn’t bigotry, people don’t want trans folks to stop existing, no, in Western society you can be whoever you want. But it’s a tyranny of the trans community, about 1% of the population, demanding we change our values, language and set of beliefs just so that they can fit in. When, in reality, they should respect our boundaries, stay away from kids, you’re not co-parents, stay out of women’s bathrooms, sports. Live your life, but don’t force us to agree, don’t call us bigots for saying no. Their “womanhood” is a logical shipwreck, built on feelings, cliches, intimidation. Science doesn’t bow to pronoun fits. A woman’s an adult human female, XX chromosomes, ovaries, uterus, that’s the fact they can’t escape. So, keep sobbing, trans clowns, your scam’s a joke, this question’s your kryptonite.

⛔️🏳️‍⚧️ Trans’ GREATEST Weakness 🏳️‍⚧️⛔️ ———————- Okay, everyone, let’s see why trans people screech like demented hyenas when you ask, “WHAT IS A WOMAN?” They call the question irrelevant, nonsensical, and they think that they can wave it off with shouting, bullying and accusing everyone of transphobia and bigotry, but, why does it bug them? Because it forces them to face reality, not their fantasy. It exposes their “identity” belief as a lie, and, If it’s so meaningless, why do they lose their minds defending it? Their reason: “I feel like a woman, so I’m a real one,” as if emotions trump facts. That’s moronic, feeling like a pilot doesn’t let you fly a plane. Their “gender identity” is a fairy tale, if it’s all vibes, why do 80% of trans women keep their junk, per a 2023 UCLA study? When you ask them: “What does feeling like a woman means or entails?” they spew drivel like: “It’s an inner vibe,” or “It’s not about genitals, it’s my identity” or “Womanhood is who I am, not my body” Or “My body’s wrong,” or just other gibberish. That’s ONLY stereotypes, feelings or dysphoria, NOT A DEFINITION. They claim it’s a “social construct,” or “biology’s too complex,” citing intersex cases. But that is just cum-farts, because, intersex is 0.02-1.7% of people, per 2023 medical data, it doesn’t erase the 99.98% male-female binary. Moreover, their 2018 Nature brain scans, claiming trans brains mimic women’s are shaky studies show no proof feelings override DNA, just wishful thinking from tiny samples. They say we’re “evolving” to accept men as women, women as men, like biology’s a suggestion. What a crock, evolution doesn’t rewrite DNA because of your skirt fetish, you’re not rewriting humanity, you’re just loud about it. Meanwhile, those biologically born women who support trans nonsense are pathetic, spineless sellouts, drunk on woke clout, sob stories, ditching reason. Their “be kind, accept identity” line’s a joke, kindness doesn’t rewrite science, you’re enabling a delusion that erases your own biology, wake up, morons. If trans people answer to “what is a woman?” is how you feel and what you identify with, fine, believe that, but they don’t get to shove it down everyone’s throats, bully, attack, insult anyone who disagrees, misgenders, skips their pronouns, flinging “bigot,” “transphobia” like herpes at a frat party. Disagreement isn’t bigotry, people don’t want trans folks to stop existing, no, in Western society you can be whoever you want. But it’s a tyranny of the trans community, about 1% of the population, demanding we change our values, language and set of beliefs just so that they can fit in. When, in reality, they should respect our boundaries, stay away from kids, you’re not co-parents, stay out of women’s bathrooms, sports. Live your life, but don’t force us to agree, don’t call us bigots for saying no. Their “womanhood” is a logical shipwreck, built on feelings, cliches, intimidation. Science doesn’t bow to pronoun fits. A woman’s an adult human female, XX chromosomes, ovaries, uterus, that’s the fact they can’t escape. So, keep sobbing, trans clowns, your scam’s a joke, this question’s your kryptonite.

The Gay Ali Baba Show

72,561 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Seeing the reaction from Stans whenever Beyoncé’s touring numbers drop is always fun to watch. The reason Stan Twitter tries so hard to downplay Beyoncé’s success is simple: her success doesn’t make sense to them. They grew up in an era where relevance is measured by TikTok trends, monthly listeners, and streaming stats. If you’re not on their “For You” page or trending in their circle, then to them, no one is talking about it. That’s the bubble they live in. But Beyoncé had already been that girl before most of them were even born. She grew up at a time where success was measured differently. Back when albums were bought in stores, played on CD players, and listened to with intention, not just shuffled in the background. People listened when they needed to, when it fit into their lives. That behavior carried into the streaming era. So no, her fans aren’t streaming every hour to inflate numbers or chase chart positions. They stream when it matters, when the moment calls for it. Because they have lives - jobs, families, real responsibilities. Music is part of their world, not their whole identity. To them, if a tour doesn’t sell out in five minutes, it’s a flop. But Beyoncé’s audience isn’t made up of teens with autoplay on. Her fans are grown. They budget. They plan. They coordinate with partners, babysitters, schedules. And yes, sometimes they buy tickets the week and day of the show and the show still sells out. Beyoncé is one of the few artists in history still dominating the mainstream conversation decades into her career. And because she doesn’t fit into their metrics, and they can’t relate to her music, it bothers them. She breaks their reality, so they assume there must be some behind-the-scenes manipulation. But what they fail to understand is this: Beyoncé doesn’t need to chase relevance. She defines it. And her success predating the streaming/social media era, insulates her from negative media and viral posts on social media.

Seeing the reaction from Stans whenever Beyoncé’s touring numbers drop is always fun to watch. The reason Stan Twitter tries so hard to downplay Beyoncé’s success is simple: her success doesn’t make sense to them. They grew up in an era where relevance is measured by TikTok trends, monthly listeners, and streaming stats. If you’re not on their “For You” page or trending in their circle, then to them, no one is talking about it. That’s the bubble they live in. But Beyoncé had already been that girl before most of them were even born. She grew up at a time where success was measured differently. Back when albums were bought in stores, played on CD players, and listened to with intention, not just shuffled in the background. People listened when they needed to, when it fit into their lives. That behavior carried into the streaming era. So no, her fans aren’t streaming every hour to inflate numbers or chase chart positions. They stream when it matters, when the moment calls for it. Because they have lives - jobs, families, real responsibilities. Music is part of their world, not their whole identity. To them, if a tour doesn’t sell out in five minutes, it’s a flop. But Beyoncé’s audience isn’t made up of teens with autoplay on. Her fans are grown. They budget. They plan. They coordinate with partners, babysitters, schedules. And yes, sometimes they buy tickets the week and day of the show and the show still sells out. Beyoncé is one of the few artists in history still dominating the mainstream conversation decades into her career. And because she doesn’t fit into their metrics, and they can’t relate to her music, it bothers them. She breaks their reality, so they assume there must be some behind-the-scenes manipulation. But what they fail to understand is this: Beyoncé doesn’t need to chase relevance. She defines it. And her success predating the streaming/social media era, insulates her from negative media and viral posts on social media.

IChooseViolence

32,535 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

One of the most shocking moments of the interview came when Tiffany went after BlackRock CEO Larry Fink—the man who controls more 401(k) assets than anyone else on the planet. She revealed Fink’s haunting admission. He doesn’t believe Americans have a right to retire at 65. “In fact,” Tiffany said, paraphrasing him, “if they think they have a right to retire at 65, that’s an idea based in the Ottoman Empire and they’re absolutely crazy.” Fink believes people should keep working into their 70s—or even into their 80s. This isn’t just Fink’s outrageous opinion—it’s a warning shot and we need to pay attention. Tiffany said Fink is actively lobbying for control over Americans’ retirement funds so he can use them to prop up his failing private equity empire. “This is the man that needs his company to maintain control over your 401k,” she said, pointing to the glaring conflict of interest. “He’s now saying Americans shouldn’t be allowed to access our own 401k money at 65 years old,” she added. “This is one massive pyramid scheme… and we should not be allowing this level of control in any sector of our market.” They already dominate the system, Tiffany warned—and now, they’re coming for your future.

One of the most shocking moments of the interview came when Tiffany went after BlackRock CEO Larry Fink—the man who controls more 401(k) assets than anyone else on the planet. She revealed Fink’s haunting admission. He doesn’t believe Americans have a right to retire at 65. “In fact,” Tiffany said, paraphrasing him, “if they think they have a right to retire at 65, that’s an idea based in the Ottoman Empire and they’re absolutely crazy.” Fink believes people should keep working into their 70s—or even into their 80s. This isn’t just Fink’s outrageous opinion—it’s a warning shot and we need to pay attention. Tiffany said Fink is actively lobbying for control over Americans’ retirement funds so he can use them to prop up his failing private equity empire. “This is the man that needs his company to maintain control over your 401k,” she said, pointing to the glaring conflict of interest. “He’s now saying Americans shouldn’t be allowed to access our own 401k money at 65 years old,” she added. “This is one massive pyramid scheme… and we should not be allowing this level of control in any sector of our market.” They already dominate the system, Tiffany warned—and now, they’re coming for your future.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

31,834 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is Madalein Matar, an Arab-Israeli trans model and beauty influencer, being interviewed by Lebanese YouTuber Karam Halloum. He refers to her in deeply degrading, dehumanizing ways — including in the title of the interview itself. But I don’t actually want to focus on him, I want to focus on her. What struck me was how completely unbothered she is. She has the kind of zero-fucks-to-give attitude that only comes from someone who has been fighting to exist their entire life, and knows exactly who they are. That confidence is backed by the reality that the country she lives in, Israel, protects her rights. She’s undoubtedly heard this kind of cruelty before, probably many times, but instead of collapsing under it, she moves through it with zero interest in appeasing anyone who wants to humiliate or erase her. The fight she is fighting is one many young LGBT people in the West will never understand, particularly the Queers for Palestine idiots. They’re so ideologically subverted, so hypnotized by the exotic Islamist cause they’ve taken up, that they don’t even see the level of privilege they’re displaying. It’s a privilege to cosplay activism from thousands of miles away because it’s trendy — especially when the movement you’re aligning with demands your murder. It’s a privilege Madalein doesn’t have, and when they refuse to acknowledge that privilege, when they pretend it doesn’t exist, they don’t just erase the imbalance. They erase her. She’s erased by people like Karam through open dehumanization, and she’s erased again by Western LGBT “activists” who ignore her existence because her reality is inconvenient to their narrative. Her fight, her survival, her truth don’t fit the script — so they pretend she isn’t there. I can’t think of anything more narcissistic. She represents what real trans activism actually looks like. It’s not performance, theatrics, or costumes — but calm, brave defiance. Mad respect to her.

This is Madalein Matar, an Arab-Israeli trans model and beauty influencer, being interviewed by Lebanese YouTuber Karam Halloum. He refers to her in deeply degrading, dehumanizing ways — including in the title of the interview itself. But I don’t actually want to focus on him, I want to focus on her. What struck me was how completely unbothered she is. She has the kind of zero-fucks-to-give attitude that only comes from someone who has been fighting to exist their entire life, and knows exactly who they are. That confidence is backed by the reality that the country she lives in, Israel, protects her rights. She’s undoubtedly heard this kind of cruelty before, probably many times, but instead of collapsing under it, she moves through it with zero interest in appeasing anyone who wants to humiliate or erase her. The fight she is fighting is one many young LGBT people in the West will never understand, particularly the Queers for Palestine idiots. They’re so ideologically subverted, so hypnotized by the exotic Islamist cause they’ve taken up, that they don’t even see the level of privilege they’re displaying. It’s a privilege to cosplay activism from thousands of miles away because it’s trendy — especially when the movement you’re aligning with demands your murder. It’s a privilege Madalein doesn’t have, and when they refuse to acknowledge that privilege, when they pretend it doesn’t exist, they don’t just erase the imbalance. They erase her. She’s erased by people like Karam through open dehumanization, and she’s erased again by Western LGBT “activists” who ignore her existence because her reality is inconvenient to their narrative. Her fight, her survival, her truth don’t fit the script — so they pretend she isn’t there. I can’t think of anything more narcissistic. She represents what real trans activism actually looks like. It’s not performance, theatrics, or costumes — but calm, brave defiance. Mad respect to her.

Matthew Nouriel

13,945 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Alex Karp just said what every other tech CEO is terrified to admit: the world doesn’t split three ways. It splits two. And second place is extinction. Europe watches. Everyone else becomes a customer. The fight is binary. America or China. One owns the future’s operating system. The other lives inside it, powerless. Karp: “There are only two cultures that are going to win in the next year. It’s going to be us or China.” Technology isn’t neutral. The builder’s values get hardcoded into everything. If we don’t own the chips, the models, the infrastructure, the beliefs embedded in the next century won’t be freedom or rights. They’ll be surveillance and control. Karp: “If we are not the ones controlling the violence, we will not be dictating the rule of law.” AI is a weapon system. Not potentially. Inherently. Restraint doesn’t buy peace. It guarantees defeat. If the Constitution matters, if speech matters, if any of it matters, America has to win technologically. Power doesn’t negotiate values. It imposes them. Thinking caution earns respect is suicidal delusion. The enemy isn’t slowing down for ethics debates. They’re building at war speed while we workshop guardrails. Karp: “No one is coming to defend you. You have to defend yourself.” No cavalry. No referees. No shared humanity saving the day. Just two civilizations in a cage match for permanent control. Outbuild them or surrender everything. Not eventually. Now. Because losing this race doesn’t mean second place. It means your children grow up under a system that doesn’t even pretend you have rights.

Alex Karp just said what every other tech CEO is terrified to admit: the world doesn’t split three ways. It splits two. And second place is extinction. Europe watches. Everyone else becomes a customer. The fight is binary. America or China. One owns the future’s operating system. The other lives inside it, powerless. Karp: “There are only two cultures that are going to win in the next year. It’s going to be us or China.” Technology isn’t neutral. The builder’s values get hardcoded into everything. If we don’t own the chips, the models, the infrastructure, the beliefs embedded in the next century won’t be freedom or rights. They’ll be surveillance and control. Karp: “If we are not the ones controlling the violence, we will not be dictating the rule of law.” AI is a weapon system. Not potentially. Inherently. Restraint doesn’t buy peace. It guarantees defeat. If the Constitution matters, if speech matters, if any of it matters, America has to win technologically. Power doesn’t negotiate values. It imposes them. Thinking caution earns respect is suicidal delusion. The enemy isn’t slowing down for ethics debates. They’re building at war speed while we workshop guardrails. Karp: “No one is coming to defend you. You have to defend yourself.” No cavalry. No referees. No shared humanity saving the day. Just two civilizations in a cage match for permanent control. Outbuild them or surrender everything. Not eventually. Now. Because losing this race doesn’t mean second place. It means your children grow up under a system that doesn’t even pretend you have rights.

Dustin

589,418 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce