Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

36,529 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🤔 Jess Phillips has finally said the quiet part out loud. On the Electoral Dysfunction podcast she calls Andy Burnham’s Gaza apology “very significant” because her constituents felt “betrayed”. She admits she only held Birmingham Yardley in spite of Starmer’s stance, while people like Jonathan Ashworth were wiped out in Leicester. She scraped through a volatile campaign full of abuse, and now casually acknowledges that what’s happening thousands of miles away in Gaza is deciding elections in Birmingham and other inner-city seats. Let’s translate that: a sizeable bloc of Muslim voters treats Gaza as a single-issue litmus test. Local schools, crime, housing, the economy? Secondary. Align with their view on a foreign conflict or you’re finished. Phillips is essentially admitting that unless Labour politicians pander hard enough on this one issue, they lose their jobs. This isn’t new. It’s been the reality for years in certain seats. Politicians of all stripes have tiptoed around it, watered down statements, rushed to call for ceasefires the moment the polling numbers flickered. Foreign wars that have zero direct bearing on the day-to-day lives of most British voters are now make-or-break for who represents us in Westminster. Phillips can dress it up as “listening to constituents”, but the implication is clear: one demographic’s overseas grievance gets to veto candidates and dictate party policy. That’s not democracy functioning as it should. That’s bloc politics reducing British elections to a referendum on the Middle East. If your seat depends on satisfying that demand, you will pander. They have done for years. And the rest of the country is expected to pretend this is normal.

J Stewart

126,993 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen