Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SUES ILLINOIS GOV. PRITZKER OVER LAWS BLOCKING ICE FROM COURTHOUSES, HOSPITALS, AND SCHOOLS States don't get to nullify federal law. The DOJ filed suit Monday against Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Attorney General Kwame Raoul over new state laws prohibiting immigration agents from making arrests at...

93,610 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A new misinformation campaign is being spread by Democrat influencers saying ICE agents aren’t real law enforcement officers Legal experts break it down “Are ICE agents real law enforcement with real law enforcement powers? A lot of people are saying they aren't, but that's wrong: Independent of what you think of them, under the law, which is what we talk about here, ICE agents are real federal law enforcement officers. They actually complete their training at the same giant federal facilities where other agencies like the Secret Service, DEA, and Marshals train. As for the law, their authority to investigate and make arrests for immigration crimes falls under these two federal statutes, sections 1226 and 1357. But because they are sworn federal law enforcement officers, they also have broad Title 18 authority. Title 18 being the the general code of federal criminal laws in the US. And this is a big point of misunderstanding for people. A lot of people think that ICE only has authority for immigration related offenses. And while it's true that ICE's main mission is to enforce immigration related crimes, they won't be stopped on a bank robbery. For example: They still technically have the legal authority to arrest for tons of different federal crimes committed in their presence. Because they are sworn federal law enforcement. This is how we see ICE agents in the news arresting for things like obstruction and assault, even though these aren't specific immigration offenses. And because tons of people in the comments are getting this wrong, this is just an important clarification for you to know.”

Wall Street Apes

33,633 views • 6 months ago

They put a visibility notice on this post, so I'm gonna post it again. Bcos fuck em, that's why. Apparently, this stupid bitch Attorney General Pamela Bondi Pam Bondi is trying to bully States into doing what she and the Pedo-in-Chief Krasnov Donald J. Trump want them to do. Allow me to repeat this: New York v. United States (1992) Printz v. United States (1997) Murphy v. NCAA (2018) These are U.S. Supreme Court cases that established what has become known as the "anti-commandeering doctrine." The anti-commandeering doctrine is based on the 10th Amendment which states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The anti-commandeering doctrine is a principle that PROHIBITS the federal government from forcing States or state officials into implementing or enforcing federal immigration law. The anti-commandeering doctrine dictates that the Constitution gives the federal government the power over immigration and naturalization; therefore, you cannot force State Governors nor Mayors into complying with your stupid ass letter Attorney General Pamela Bondi Pam Bondi threatening them with imprisonment. And your the MAGA dumbasses about to jump on here talking about the Article VI, Clause 2 Supremacy Clause, just know, this clause deals with contradictions and conflicts between State LAWS and Federal LAWS. Not a single State has immigration laws that conflict or contradict Federal immigration laws, so the Supremacy Clause does NOT apply here. 👇👇👇👇👇

Gene Trevino

77,495 views • 11 months ago