Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Trump has been "first pro-Soviet and then pro-Russian for decades." The renowned philosopher Francis Fukuyama: Trump visited Moscow in the 1980s, when the Soviet Union still existed. Later, he spent tens of thousands of dollars on advertisements in the *New York Times* claiming that NATO was the cause of...

81,071 просмотров • 20 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 29

Фото профиля Mads Frederik Toft
Mads Frederik Toft20 дней назад

The Russians discovered with Trump that they could take over the United States, not with guns, bombs, and missiles. But with mouth diarrhea and empty promises.

Фото профиля AnatolijUkraine
AnatolijUkraine19 дней назад

The disturbing part isn’t that people are only noticing it now. It’s how many warning signs were visible for decades — and how easily they were dismissed. Whatever explains Trump’s worldview, the pattern is impossible to ignore: again and again, his instinct is to attack America’s alliances while treating Moscow with extraordinary deference. Putin couldn’t ask for a more useful imbalance.

Фото профиля Norbert
Norbert20 дней назад

Anyway:

Фото профиля Massimiliano Giavarini 🇮🇹
Massimiliano Giavarini 🇮🇹19 дней назад

In my view, this does not change the nature of the problem, which remains the question of how it is possible for someone with multiple convictions to run for office and get elected.

Фото профиля Gogol Borrego™ 🇺🇦
Gogol Borrego™ 🇺🇦19 дней назад

"Trump has been "first pro-Soviet and then pro-Russian for decades," is interestingly put when one should be calling Krasnov traitor

Фото профиля Realview
Realview19 дней назад

Soviets probably offered him prostitutes and took a nice movie of him fucking them. They have been blackmailing him since then.

Фото профиля Christoph Camenzind
Christoph Camenzind19 дней назад

@Sunnymica This has been known for decades. Trump is a Russian project.

Фото профиля Serhii
Serhii20 дней назад

The bigger question is not what Trump believed decades ago. It is whether today’s foreign policy is rewarding Russia for aggression. If Moscow can invade a neighbor, occupy territory, and eventually get a deal that reflects its demands, that precedent will matter far beyond Ukraine. History will judge the outcome, not the slogans.

Фото профиля ArianeWidmer
ArianeWidmer19 дней назад

TRUMP IS A KGB AGENT.

Фото профиля Michelle Rainer
Michelle Rainer20 дней назад

Fukuyama is talking nonsense, Trump+the US business elite are anti EU, the last thing they want is a free Ukraine(+the UK) to increase the economic power of the EU, they are perfectly happy with Ukraine staying under Russian control, a weak+fractured Europe is easier to rip off

Фото профиля Pavel Štern
Pavel Štern19 дней назад

Finally! Russian asset Krasnov! Long time!

Фото профиля Nate Rathbun🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦
Nate Rathbun🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦19 дней назад

Fukuyama has got a lot wrong in the past, but he’s absolutely right about this.

Фото профиля The Solutions Party
The Solutions Party19 дней назад

Trump has always been the tyrant in his own organization, it’s the only thing he understands, and other tyrants like Putin and Kim Jong Un are the only people he not only relates to, he admires them. His ilk are the worst combination of ego, illness, and powerful..

Фото профиля MAC
MAC19 дней назад

Krasnov was installed by Russia&China who are the biggest beneficiaries of his UNAmerican foreign policy.

Фото профиля linda A saunders
linda A saunders19 дней назад

Yes, finally somebody says something that speaks the truth. Please get this out to EU leaders though they probably already know❗️❗️❗️

Фото профиля Luis Silva Ferreira
Luis Silva Ferreira19 дней назад

All the world has to pay for #PEDOTUS perversions!

Фото профиля Mr. Miata™ミスター・ミアータ™
Mr. Miata™ミスター・ミアータ™19 дней назад

Chances in the 80s in moZcow Trump was a target of kgb recruiters 100% Chances he was smart enough not to fall into honey puss traps 0%

Фото профиля Jessica's Xitter ⚛️
Jessica's Xitter ⚛️19 дней назад

Trump is a Kremlin asset & America's Manchurian Candidate. There to destroy US Alliances & relationships.

Фото профиля Oksana
Oksana19 дней назад

With all due respect those who know 🇸🇮were bot "puzzling' over it or pun's motives for decades starting with don't give the 🇸🇮control of the USSR's nukes. 4.5 years into the war without a clear message for 🇺🇦's victory is a cONDEMNATION of ALL democracies who have FAILED to WIN the war with 🇺🇦 against 🇸🇮. And still rely on talk. Pathetic! ACADEMICS! pathetic NATO! Pathetic political leaders!

Фото профиля 5FtOh
5FtOh19 дней назад

When Soviets pick a traitor to his own country and spend billions keeping him afloat, including over $1B from Deutsche's own Justin Kennedy...

Фото профиля HeadlineZoo
HeadlineZoo19 дней назад

More specifically: Trump came back from "vacation" in Moscow in 1987 and took out full page ads in the New York Times, Washington Post and Boston Globe attacking #NATO. A very strange thing to do in the 1980's at the height of the cold war. He is clearly a Russian asset.

Фото профиля David
David19 дней назад

If only he had been listened too in 2014 things could have turned out so much better for Everyone concerned.

Фото профиля Disney4Eternity
Disney4Eternity19 дней назад

Trump is Russian asset (always has been). 💯

Фото профиля Jukka P.Seppälä 🐶💛💙🇫🇮🇪🇺 #standwithUkraine🎗
Jukka P.Seppälä 🐶💛💙🇫🇮🇪🇺 #standwithUkraine🎗19 дней назад

🎯

Фото профиля Herbert Elizabeth f.e.l.l.a.
Herbert Elizabeth f.e.l.l.a.19 дней назад

We all knew. immigration is what the extreme right are using to gain access to power The only way to undermine this is to give the people what they are asking for. Severe hard stop on immigration including legal, and return of all illegal migrants (including legacy illegals)

Фото профиля Tribalisation
Tribalisation19 дней назад

Surprising that online pro-Ukraine pundits such as #ukrainematters and #anderspucknielsen still reject without discussion the possibility that Donald Krasnov might be a kremlin spy.

Фото профиля Jacques Christian
Jacques Christian18 дней назад

@_freeUkraine ☝️🙏🙌✊NO PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE & BORDERS SOVEREIGNTY☝️☘️🕊️🌻✌️🫶🙏✊💪

Фото профиля Mr.Curly
Mr.Curly19 дней назад

What was the cost of Trump’s ads in the New York Times, were they aimed at NATO?

Фото профиля BrendaB
BrendaB19 дней назад

Popular American pundits refused to speak the truth because they make money by toeing the line, are intractable supporters of centrist corporatist Democrats & favor the status quo over democracy. However, Kendzior & Chalupa, Timothy Snyder & Jason Stanley are outspoken @ facism.

Похожие видео

BIG | 🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦‼️‼️ Francis Fukuyama is challenging the idea that Donald Trump has fundamentally shifted toward Ukraine, arguing that his sympathy toward Moscow is not a recent phenomenon but a political instinct stretching back decades. The Stanford political scientist recalled Trump’s 1980s visit to Moscow and his subsequent newspaper advertisements arguing that NATO allies were exploiting the United States and that Washington should stop carrying such a large share of the alliance’s costs. Fukuyama argues that Trump maintained first a pro-Soviet and later a consistently Russia-friendly outlook for decades. In his assessment, Trump’s current frustration with Moscow does not mean he has become more sympathetic toward Ukraine; rather, he expected Russia to prevail and is irritated that neither Moscow’s battlefield performance nor his diplomatic efforts have produced the settlement he anticipated. That distinction matters enormously for Ukraine. Trump may become angry with Putin when Moscow obstructs his negotiations, but temporary frustration is not the same as a strategic shift toward Kyiv. Russia is still intensifying the war while demanding concessions Ukraine considers unacceptable, and Washington’s repeated search for a deal without consistently raising the cost of Russian aggression risks convincing the Kremlin that patience will eventually pay. A genuinely pro-American strategy would strengthen Ukraine enough that Putin has more to lose by continuing the war than by ending it. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

21,972 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Today they call me pro-Russian. Tomorrow they can call you that too. Almost everyone who has talked about peace and compromise has been branded, without nuance, “pro-Russian” — by the government, its media, and its experts.Any realistic terms for peace: “pro-Russian”. Criticism of Zelenskyy, of corruption, of official inaction: also “pro-Russian”. Then it is your own view. Then other parties. Then foreign journalists. Tucker Carlson is “pro-Russian” because he interviewed Putin. Few people know he asked Zelenskyy for an interview much earlier. Zelenskyy will not sit with him. Tucker is unpredictable. You have to be ready to argue. Zelenskyy wants a soft interview — a warm bath. Elon Musk opened humanitarian corridors out of Mariupol and still provides Starlink to the front. When he is inconvenient, he is “pro-Russian”. When he is useful, he is a “friend of Ukraine” again. Trump laid out a logic for ending the war — and was piled on. The president of Czechia said Ukraine needs peace — and was hounded. The same script has been used on a whole list of politicians and countries. The only “correct” position is this: stay quiet about corruption, keep escalating the rhetoric and the strikes, and leave civilians almost unprotected. Hunt down anyone who steps out of line. By that logic, anyone can become “pro-Russian”. The hard truth is simpler. Sooner or later, there will have to be a conversation with Russia. Otherwise diplomacy does not win. And without air defense for civilians, in year five of the war, with crushing corruption, it is ordinary Ukrainians who will keep paying for this war in blood.

Iuliia Mendel

53,932 просмотров • 14 дней назад

BOOM! I have been donated a massive trove of former Soviet Union science and technology media for AI review and training (with caveats). I have the next big trove today. From films, video tape, pictures, microfilm and digital files. Millions of sources. No AI company has had this type of access to this type of data and I worked decades to make it happen. What are we seeing here? At 7:00 p.m. Moscow time, Mikhail Gorbachev delivered a live televised resignation speech in which he announced the end of his role as President of the Soviet Union, declaring that the office itself would cease to exist. Shortly after the address, the Soviet flag was lowered above the Moscow Kremlin and replaced with the Russian tricolour, a moment that became one of the defining images of the collapse of the USSR. The following day, on December 26 1991, the final regular broadcast of USSR Central Television signed off as the Soviet Union was formally dissolved by the Supreme Soviet. The closing moments included the playing of the Soviet national anthem for the final time before broadcasting transitioned to the new Russian television system. The televised resignation, the lowering of the flag, and the final Soviet broadcast together marked the symbolic and official end. The wall blocking closed research opened but few in the west could access it. In the chaos many thought it was lost. It was not. 90% of the science and research still has not been made widely available. No AI company with new hires can understand this let alone find it. It will be in your AI labeled and extending first principles.

Brian Roemmele

18,013 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This “Stop The War coalition” supported Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014. More accurately, it’s a Stop The West coalition, continuing an old playbook used by the similarly misnamed “World Peace Council”. Presented as a supposedly spontaneous post-WW2 initiative of intellectuals across Europe, the Soviets maintained strict control over its activities and messaging. They defined war and imperialism as inherent features of capitalism, while defining peace as communism. With that logic, it would only ever condemn the West for waging war, while either staying quiet or defending wars and occupations of the Soviet Union. Only the West ever had agency to them. Just as Stop The War blames the West for Russia invading Ukraine and laments the end of Assad’s civil war in Syria, the World Peace Council supported the North Korean invasion of South Korea and had nothing to say about the Soviet crushing of the uprising in Hungary nor the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. It demanded the US, UK, and France withdraw all troops abroad, but of course never demanded the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the occupied Baltic countries – or anywhere else. Based on its noble-sounding name, the World Peace Council grew into the most prominent part of the post-WW2 international ‘peace’ movement, organising protests and lobbying campaigns around the world focused on opposing NATO and other Western activity. Its devoutly communist members slowly lost their faith in their funders, however. One notable blow came from their own side when Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, a former Red Army captain sent to the gulag by Stalin was released and allowed by Kruschev to write about Stalinist terror …before he once again became persona non grata after Khrushchev and got arrested. While trying to ignore growing divisions and disillusionments among communists, the World Peace Council got epically trolled on this. Someone (which we now know from declassified files was British intelligence) issued a fake statement on their behalf in support of Solzhenitsyn after he got arrested. It had all the pro-Soviet rambling hallmarks of a real World Peace Council statement but its singular purpose was to goad them into having to declare their actual position on Solzhenitsyn. The World Peace Council took the bait. It wanted to maintain silence about human rights in the Soviet Union but, even more so, it could never allow itself to be seen to stray from the official Soviet position. So they angrily denounced the fake letter, making it clear that they had never said anything at all ever about Solzhenitsyn. Their concern for human rights always stopped at the Soviet border. Solzhenitsyn himself isn’t an admirable figure, by the way. He was merely off message at the time due to his personal experience of Soviet terror but remained a Russian imperialist after the end of the Soviet Union. More important is what he directly revealed about Soviet terror and what his case indirectly revealed about Soviet supporters around the world. The World Peace Council increasingly discredited itself, alongside the collapsing Soviet Union. The membership splintered. New groups came out of it. Key figures behind Stop The War were part of the World Peace Council and regularly appear on Russian state channels. In this same speech from Dianne Abbott, she even decries the “coup” against Assad and includes it in her list of US wars. Yeah, not the actual Civil War, but the end of that war. And they can’t ascribe any agency to Syrians. Stop The War and Dianne Abbot used to hold panel discussions about the Syrian war with pro-Assad talking points from only Western panelists while Syrians complained that they were excluded. The Soviet Union is no more. World communism can’t inspire many people anymore. But, absent its strict dogmatism, it’s still the same logic about war and peace used by organisations like Stop The War and Dianne Abbot in this clip.

Bad Baltic Takes

30,701 просмотров • 1 месяц назад