Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Trump on Iran’s nuclear program: “I would say it's set back permanently. If there were to do it again, they might as well start in a different location because that location is totally demolished. They could start, but I would think they would have to start at a different... show more
69,511 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

It wasn't completely destroyed. If you had allowed Israel a few more days and weren't so eager to close the story, it might have been completely destroyed.

But this time thete is no IAEA to monitor or observe. Opacity will prevail.

Operation Midnight Hammer achieved its objective: Iran’s Fordow and Natanz facilities are rubble. Enrichment above civilian thresholds wasn’t energy—it was provocation. The strike enforced a decade-old red line after Tehran violated IAEA safeguards and stockpiled weapons-grade uranium. This wasn’t escalation—it was strategic necessity. Deterrence through precision force prevents wider conflict. Iran’s choice remains unchanged: halt enrichment or face consequences. Peace through strength works when globalist diplomacy fails.

Truth. It would be a futile endeavor

This guy is so ignorant

So….it’s not “obliterated?” 😂😂

Big if true—but Iran’s nuclear ambitions aren’t that easy to wipe out. @OwenTurnertrade, thoughts? Sounds like more of the same tough talk without a real plan.

Trump’s right-Iran’s nuclear ambitions are seriously crippled. That’s how you deal with threats.

He is so clueless. They have already started rebuilding the sites.

He can't do anything

