Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Trump understands every argument made by mass murderer Putin. It's obvious he loves dictators. Perhaps I will travel to Ukraine to address the parliament. I don't believe it's necessary, but if it would help save 25,000 lives a month, I would go, – Trump. Further statements: ➡️ I hope...

39,115 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇲🇺🇦🇷🇺 We talked about what weapons Ukraine needs — they desperately need "Patriots." They would like "Tomahawks." That's a step up... We discussed this with Zelensky," Trump said Other statements by the American president: ➡️ I have to give credit to Ukraine for holding up so well. They are great fighters. Very good fighters. ➡️ I think it would be in Putin's interest to settle this. And I believe he will settle it — we'll see. But if not, it won't be good for him. It won't be good, to be honest. ➡️ We had a very good conversation with Zelensky this morning and yesterday. As you know, we do not send any weapons directly — we send them to NATO, and NATO pays. ➡️ Biden gave Ukraine $350 billion, and we gave them, we gave them... nothing. But we gave them respect and some other things. ➡️ We talked about armaments — they need more, we are considering it. Hopefully, we can provide it. ➡️ You know, our country also needs weapons. We can't give away so many weapons that we have none left. ➡️ Will I send "Tomahawks"? We'll see. I don't know, I'll have to talk to Russia. Do they want "Tomahawks" flying their way? I don't think so. ➡️ I'll have to talk to Russia, I told Zelensky about this. Because "Tomahawks" are a new step of aggression. You understand this very well. I would say to Putin: look, if this war is not settled, I will provide them with "Tomahawks." ➡️ "Tomahawks" are incredible weapons, very offensive. And, honestly, Russia doesn't need this. They don't need it. If the war is not resolved, we can definitely do this. Maybe we won't, but maybe we will. I think it's appropriate. Yes. I want the war to be resolved. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

15,360 views • 10 months ago

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

Kateryna Lisunova

25,494 views • 2 months ago