Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇺🇸 TRUMP’S COMEBACK IS DELIVERING: PAYCHECKS UP, MORTGAGES DOWN IN 2026 Marcus Lemonis just dropped his 2026 money predictions, and for once, it’s not all doom and broke vibes. He says Americans will actually see more cash in their paychecks, lower mortgage payments, and bigger tax refunds. And Goldman...

26,074 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THE FED IS OUT OF EXITS The 10-Year Treasury yield just broke above 4.40% First time since June 2025. Remember the last time we crossed that line? April 2025. Trump's "90-day tariff pause." The emergency button got slammed for a reason. That same line is back. Right on schedule. And here's what nobody on cable news is telling you: Rate HIKES are now what the Fed is expected to do next. Not cuts. Hikes. In plain English: the Fed is about to make borrowing more expensive, not cheaper. What that means for you: ➮ 30-year mortgage rates are heading back to 7% ➮ Inflation just hit a 3-year high ➮ "Higher for longer" - the policy everyone thought was dead is officially back Seemingly overnight. Now here's the math nobody on TV wants to do out loud: The US government has to refinance trillions in debt this year at these higher rates. Every tick higher in rates costs the Treasury billions more in interest. Which puts the Fed in a corner with two exits. If they HIKE to crush inflation - the stock market, housing, and credit markets crack at the same time. If they HOLD or CUT to save the markets - inflation spirals again and the dollar bleeds out. There is no third door. This isn't a policy decision anymore. It's a math problem with no solution. The clock is ticking. Most people will keep believing "the Fed has it under control" until their mortgage payment, their grocery bill, and their portfolio tell them otherwise. Don't worry though - my system flags the exact moment the market shifts from caution to DANGER. I called every major top and bottom of the last decade. You'll be warned before it hits, like always. So make sure to TURN ON NOTIFS and follow

Reflection🪩

132,195 views • 2 months ago

Things have gotten so expensive in America, this woman says “I have my Masters in Business Administration. My husband is an Engineer — We are living paycheck to paycheck, like it is so hard - Our mortgage has gone up $500 since when we first bought it - Property taxes, they just keep going up and up. So with that, our mortgage just keeps climbing too - We have two kids. With kids comes diaper prices, comes formula, comes everything else that comes with it - Daycare, we were able to find a daycare that's actually pretty inexpensive compared to a lot of other daycares. And even with that, it is still costing more than our mortgage does every month. I'm just so tired, and I know everybody is in the same boat too. Prices are going up for literally everything.Everything. But when it comes to pay, our paychecks will go up, what, a couple percent, but nothing compared to inflation on everything. I just don't understand how we keep doing it. And where's the breaking point? Where does that come in? When do things turn around because there's no end in sight. — We're given this promise basically when we're younger that if you get the degree and you do this and do that right, then like, you'll be set, you'll be golden when it comes to money and not have to worry about it. And then to grow up and face the fact that all of that's bullsh*t, like they fed it into being such a lie in such a trap basically, that everybody is just buried in different student loans. Everybody is buried in different kinds of debt that we'll never get out of, that they promised us would create a safe and happy thriving future. None of it's there. So thanks, boomers and beyond. You set us up great.”

Wall Street Apes

1,343,287 views • 11 months ago

Why 2024 and 2025 felt almost the same. Because they were part of the same cycle, not separate chapters. Think of them as Part I and Part II of one lesson. 1. You were in a loop, not a journey Psychologically, 2024–2025 sat inside the same pattern: *Same type of people. *Same type of mental stress. *Same hopes, slightly rearranged *Same lessons repeating with different faces. Those years were about awareness, not reward. 2024 introduced the discomfort. 2025 intensified it. Both years were designed to: ♟️Expose emotional leaks. ♟️Show where effort wasn’t converting to value. ♟️Reveal who benefited from your over-giving. But neither year was meant to pay you. They were diagnostic years. That’s why no matter what you tried, the feeling stayed the same. ♟️... Why 2026 will be different. Because the cycle actually ends. 2026 marks a cycle exit, not continuation. It is going to feel heavier, but this time clearer. You will feel, see, and experience stability. 2024–2025 asked you to understand. 2026 demands you govern. Govern your money. Govern your time. Govern your access. That’s why it changes. Avoid anything that requires you to over-explain in 2026. Say fewer yeses. Choose fewer people. Keep money boring and controlled. 2026 is a year of authority. *Your emotional intelligence becomes financial intelligence. *Your past sacrifices will begin to reward you. That’s why it’s different.

🦉 🧘🏽‍♂️spiRituaL🧘🏽‍♂️

22,197 views • 7 months ago

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 views • 6 months ago