Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Trump’s proposal that was recently sent to Hamas includes a major change: all 48 hostages, living and dead, would be released on the deal’s first day, along with hundreds of Palestinian murderers and thousands of detainees. Israel would halt “Operation Gideon's Chariots B” to capture Gaza City and immediately...

152,481 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨Netanyahu, Trump and Rubio say they're seeking alternatives to free the hostages. Shortly I'll outline what I understand is being considered. But first: it's a completely coordinated move. Netanyahu, Trump, Rubio had a phone call revealing that Hamas, contrary to many reports (even here in Israel) is stalling talks, and as Trump and Witkoff have said, Hamas never wanted a deal in this round of talks. Hamas seems to think domestic and international pressure will force Israel to end the war. So Trump, Rubio, and Netanyahu are saying, in different words, that Israel's about to take new steps. Now, what could these steps be? It could be several things. One example: pressuring Hamas leadership abroad. Assassinations in Qatar. An American and Israeli demand to extradite Hamas leaders in Qatar, correctly claiming they committed war crimes against 1,200 Israelis, dozens of whom are also American. Second example: threats of land seizure or exile if Hamas doesn’t release hostages within a set timeframe. Other options are being considered, but Trump and Rubio are signaling that they're giving Israel a carte blanche for a major shift in the war. They see it's at an impasse due to the constant stop-start hostage release negotiations, and are claiming that Hamas is using this to prolong the war indefinitely and force Israel to end it on Hamas’ terms. There’s also confusion about what ending the war means. Everyone wants the war to end. The question is, what kind of ending? Even if Trump might be Netanyahu's puppet and if Rubio's clueless, senior officials from the previous government repeatedly said — despite their opposition to the current government — that Hamas was the main obstacle all along. This portrayal of Hamas wanting to end the war, and the cruel Israel, which for political reasons wants to war to go on forever is simply false. Hamas wants something that no Israeli leader, including opposition figures, is willing to accept. Hamas wants the war to end with a full IDF withdrawal from Gaza, without a single centimeter between Gaza and Israeli communities. Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett previously spoke about remaining on the perimeter. That's great. I wish it were possible. Hamas simply doesn't agree. It seems to me that if this isn't merely a negotiation tactic to pressure Hamas and show American support for Israel, then we're heading towards a major turning point in this war.

Amit Segal

124,624 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Hamas leadership has been living lavishly in Qatar while the people that they claim to represent in Gaza are suffering. They’ve been directing a war from the comfort of their five-star hotels for almost two years, refusing to release the 48 hostages that are still being held in Gaza. Today, Israeli officials announced that they took a targeted action against these Hamas leaders who have been terrorizing the region for years. This war in Gaza is brutal. It has to end. Palestinians are suffering, Israelis are suffering. The entire region is suffering. The people of Gaza, the Arab League, the US and Israel are all saying the same thing. Hamas must be removed from power. Inside Gaza, people are risking their lives to protest Hamas, and they’re being silenced, beaten, even killed on the streets. They know that Hamas is the reason Gaza is in ruin. They know that Hamas is the one who started the war, and Hamas is the reason that it hasn’t ended yet. And this has been Hamas’s plan all along, force Israel into a war it never wanted to fight, but has to win. Hamas spent years preparing the October 7th attack. They knew exactly what an urban war in a densely populated area would look like. They all went into hiding and left their people out to suffer. And these devastating consequences for the people of Gaza? That was a part of their strategy, to delegitimize Israel’s standing in the eyes of the world. They knew what they were doing, and Israel could not and still cannot allow these jihadists to live on its borders. No other nation would allow that. This is the linchpin of the entire conflict right now. Once Hamas is gone, the war ends, the suffering ends, and Gaza can finally rebuild. So today, Israel sent a message that there’s no safe place for terrorists anywhere on Earth, and we all need to stand together and say release the hostages, remove Hamas, end the war.

Noa Tishby

81,137 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A Hamas-Israel agreement is still far from being finalized, with three key issues yet to be resolved. I discussed this last night on החדשות - N12. First, there’s disagreement over where exactly the IDF will withdraw from. Jerusalem’s current stance is that areas it captured during Operation Gideon’s Chariots won’t be returned to Hamas, as doing so would prevent Israel from building the humanitarian zone in southern Gaza that will be free of both Hamas and weapons. Next is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. For Israel, the continuation of GHF operations during the ceasefire is crucial. Why? Because without it, the ceasefire will end up funding Hamas in the form of tens of thousands of aid trucks—the very thing that has enabled the terror group to survive 21 months of war. And finally, there’s the question of ending the war once and for all. As I’ve explained previously, Netanyahu’s coalition can likely stomach a 60-day ceasefire—but the prime minister will be harder pressed to garner enough support for a total end to the war. If Hamas remains steadfast in its demand for an end to the fighting—that may well prevent a deal from being struck. But there’s one more issue—at least on Hamas’ end. In Israel, we know that the elected government makes the ultimate decisions regarding the war. But in Gaza? It’s not entirely clear. During the first ceasefire, Hamas had Yahya Sinwar at the helm. During the second ceasefire, his brother was leading the group. But with both of them gone, along with much of Hamas’ senior leadership in the strip, it’s not clear who has the final say—and that complicates attempts to strike a final agreement, to say the least. As for Hamas’ internal debates, while the terror group recognizes the dire straits in which it finds itself, there’s disagreement over whether to let Israel remain in crucial areas such as the Morag Corridor, or to stand by the demand for a more widespread Israeli withdrawal. For now, at least, there’s nothing to suggest that the Gazan terror group is about to give in.

Amit Segal

17,725 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Trump plan, which was presented at the White House, included two parts. What was approved today in Sharm el-Sheikh has nothing to do with the future. Regarding the future of Gaza, we are still at the initial idea, which was not translated into details on the ground — and it’s no coincidence, because the assessment, at least in Israel, is that it’s impossible to really reach agreements with Hamas on its dismantling. There has not yet been an Islamic fundamentalist terrorist organization that agreed one day to simply dismantle. And so what we have here is a hostage release deal, and Israel is at a fork in the road. First, if Hamas is willing to disarm, Israel will indeed withdraw to the Gaza perimeter. If not, then not — and then IDF forces will be there, because we have no one to rely on but God and them. Now regarding the main issue. After all, Hamas ostensibly received guarantees. That’s what Hamas is saying. That’s its excuse to release the hostages. It is replacing the 48 hostages with an American-Qatar-Turkish-international guarantee that Israel will not enter. They say in Israel, “no problem, we also have guarantees. The war will end if Hamas disarms.” So we see here two American guarantees, which I, in order not to be anti-American, will not say that they are foolish. I will say that they complement each other: the war will not be renewed if Hamas disarms. And so, if you break it down even more: That war is over. It’s over. The ground entries, the raids, the exits, the Gideon’s Chariots A, B and maybe even C. What will happen next? Israel expects it to be “Lebanonization,” but in the positive sense of what happens after the ceasefire. In other words, not ground raids, but precise damage to any attempt to build up and/or harm IDF soldiers. This is the Israeli desire. We’ll see what happens on the ground.

Amit Segal

23,239 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

“Free Gaza From Hamas” Really Means “Free Gaza From All Palestinians” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to insist that Israel will carry out Trump’s ethnic cleansing plans for Gaza, saying the following on Sunday about “the final stage” of his agenda: “Hamas will lay down its weapons. Its leaders will be allowed to leave. We will see to the general security in the Gaza Strip and will allow the realization of the Trump plan for voluntary migration. This is the plan. We are not hiding this and are ready to discuss it at any time.” Netanyahu’s suggestion that Trump’s plan for the migration of Palestinians out of Gaza would be “voluntary” is misleading in two separate ways. Firstly, it is nonsensical to deliberately and systematically make a place uninhabitable and then claim that anyone who leaves that place would be leaving voluntarily. Israeli spinmeisters have been pushing this narrative since the early days of the onslaught, and it’s transparently bogus; telling people they can leave or starve to death is exactly the same as forcing them out at gunpoint. Secondly, Trump’s plan for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza is not “voluntary” on its face. Trump has explicitly said “all” Palestinians are to be removed from the enclave and would not be allowed to return, which of course necessarily means that anyone who wants to stay will not be permitted to. Netanyahu says he wants to realize Trump’s plan, and Trump’s plan is forcible ethnic cleansing. A Knesset member from Netanyahu’s Likud party named Amit Halevi was just on Israeli radio saying that the plan is “to occupy the territory to cleanse it of the enemy,” adding that Israel needs “to return to Gaza permanently and control this space, because it is part of our homeland.” I mean, how much more explicit do they need to be? When Israel apologists respond to chants of “Free Gaza” with “Free Gaza from Hamas,” what they really mean is “Free Gaza from all Palestinians.” The agenda they are cheerleading has ultimately nothing to do with Hamas — it’s about purging a Palestinian territory of Palestinians and replacing them with Israeli Jews. It’s yet another Israeli land grab and yet another drive to eliminate Palestinians from their historic homeland. If this was really about freeing Palestinians from Hamas, then why is Israel also seizing on this political moment to advance ethnic cleansing agendas in the West Bank, where Hamas does not govern? Defense Minister Israel Katz is on record saying of the occupied West Bank that “We must deal with the threat just as we deal with the terrorist infrastructure in Gaza,” and the Gaza playbook is being increasingly utilized there. Tens of thousands have been displaced as the Jenin refugee camp has been made uninhabitable under an aggressive Israeli bombing campaign, with hundreds of homes actively destroyed — not to combat Hamas, but to get rid of the Palestinians. Because that’s all this has ever been about. The western press have been obsessively covering the fact that some demonstrators in Gaza have been voicing discontent with Hamas, after those same press outlets just spent a year and a half ignoring millions of anti-genocide protesters around the world and running cover for Israel’s mass atrocities in Gaza. “Look!” we are told. “Those demonstrations prove that the people of Gaza want to be free from Hamas! This vindicates everything Israel and its allies have been doing!” But, again, Israel’s actions have nothing to do with Hamas. Hamas isn’t the reason, it’s the excuse. The excuse to advance an agenda that Israel has been trying to advance for as long as it has existed as a modern state. This is what Israel’s supporters and defenders are really advocating. Not the elimination of Hamas, and certainly not Palestinian freedom. They’re advocating the end of the existence of Palestinians on Palestinian territory. No matter how much they try to sugarcoat it, that is their position. That’s what Israel wants, so supporting Israel’s actions in Gaza is necessarily supporting the ends toward which Israel is pushing. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

81,289 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.

Amit Segal

298,292 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten