正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Trump’s unpredictability has become predictable. The pattern is now familiar: 1. Issue a maximalist threat or ultimatum 2. Prepare major military action 3. Pause or cancel the escalation 4. Announce that diplomacy could deliver a rapid breakthrough. Plus Iran’s more recent pre-emptive attack on a US base in Jordan...

27,633 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

19 条评论

Traci Burgess 的头像
Traci Burgess1 个月前

@RebeccaNel79339 Before this mess is over I want a vid of Trump on his knees begging Iranians for mercy.

gotz1981 的头像
gotz19811 个月前

Trump is joke a proper clown 🤡

Olive Green 的头像
Olive Green1 个月前

@MartineBBC Absolutely stunning in those magical glasses MC you are so special 👓❤️

Abdo Dameen MSc 的头像
Abdo Dameen MSc1 个月前

The issue i find with this take is that it’s very simple and lacks any depth and gains all of its momentum from a reactionary approach. The Iranian do not care what he says. The Iranian know what they need to do and they aren’t looking at war from a speculative narrative. They have control over the strait, no oil is going out, the US dollar will lose value, the American allies in the region can’t do anything and soon enough the American economy will suffer and then America will be force to make a favourable deal with Iran that will make Iran the 4 world power. Anything else and Iran will send the world back to 1910s and a global recession.

Zulqadar Rashid 的头像
Zulqadar Rashid1 个月前

TACO TACO TACO TACO TACO 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Regards from Pakistan 🇵🇰

Poria🇮🇷 的头像
Poria🇮🇷1 个月前

That BBC next to your name tells me I shouldn’t even listen to a second of you

Olive Green 的头像
Olive Green1 个月前

@MartineBBC Pretty in pink the lovely MC 💕

Truth Gunner 的头像
Truth Gunner1 个月前

So basically, Iran is threatening, so Trump has backed down abandoning the Iranian people for the benefit of Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s economies. He’s got his excuse

John Hill 的头像
John Hill1 个月前

SMF

DISPLAYMODE Media 的头像
DISPLAYMODE Media1 个月前

Military Vacuity, explained …

M. H 的头像
M. H1 个月前

How much damage has been inflicted on Iran? Do you know?? Many bombs have been delivered but no damage. It’s been 6 months. We will soon find out what’s been done

Shane O'Neill 的头像
Shane O'Neill1 个月前

And there's always the Huge blue and white elephant In the middle of the room Actually directing operations

Prikker 的头像
Prikker1 个月前

it is ridiculous

Pat Bruno 的头像
Pat Bruno1 个月前

AGREED 💯💯💯💯💯

Harry mcfalls 的头像
Harry mcfalls1 个月前

Threaten blink repeat enjoy your TACO

Whatevah 的头像
Whatevah1 个月前

Iran has spent decades building invisible supply chains and a hidden distributed military infrastructure. These "pulses" are designed to destroy key portions, not all, of what has become known. The "pauses" are critical for intelligence gathering. Identifying leadership, supply chain, data flow changes. Taking out a deeply entrenched opponent takes many such pulses at different pressure points.

simbimbindo 的头像
simbimbindo1 个月前

Are they not fighting militarily?

John Mills 的头像
John Mills1 个月前

Just another Groundhog Day

Texas Papa 的头像
Texas Papa1 个月前

BBC sucks cock

相关视频

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Glenn Diesen: Iran may no longer let America decide when the war starts For months, the U.S. has held one enormous advantage over Iran: escalation control. Washington can attack, pause, move toward diplomacy, then potentially attack again when conditions are more favorable. Glenn Diesen thinks Tehran is increasingly determined to take that option away. “If the U.S. know they can just stop the fighting whenever they want, then why not try another attack here or there?” His argument is that Iran may now move toward something considerably more dangerous: striking first when it sees preparations for another major U.S. or Israeli attack. Refueling aircraft assembling. Runways becoming active. Forces moving into position. “There's no reason to wait.” Diesen argues Tehran may not even consider such action a preemptive strike because, from its perspective, the war never actually ended. That may also explain the increasingly aggressive behavior around American warships. Diesen believes Iran may previously have avoided hitting them not because it lacked the capability, but because killing large numbers of U.S. sailors would force Washington dramatically higher up the escalation ladder. Now, he says, Tehran appears to be signaling that restraint may have limits. The strategic shift is subtle but potentially enormous: Iran isn't merely trying to deter the next American attack. It's trying to deny Washington the ability to choose when it happens. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

295,795 次观看 • 15 天前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's paused the bombing and replaced it with economic warfare, but Iran's response is that Washington no longer gets to decide when the shooting starts again. In a major escalation, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi says Tehran now considers pre-emptive strikes against U.S interests a legitimate option if it believes its national survival is threatened. His argument is remarkably direct: Why should Iran always wait for America to attack first? If Tehran believes another attack is coming, or that American pressure has become existential, Gharibabadi says Iran can act first. And the timing matters. Rubio is reportedly telling regional counterparts that Washington does not currently intend to launch new strikes on Iran, with Trump's pressure instead running through the naval blockade and Operation Economic Outcast. Military action remains available if Iran attacks first. That's precisely what makes Iran's new position so dangerous. Trump appears to believe he can freeze the military conflict while slowly tightening the economic noose around Tehran. But if the sanctions begin seriously biting, or Tehran concludes Washington is preparing another attack, it could choose to strike American interests first. And after the last war, Iran is considerably less intimidated by that prospect. Then there's Trump's other problem: China. Operation Economic Outcast only works if the countries keeping Iran economically connected can be pressured into compliance. But if Beijing refuses, Trump faces an ugly choice: tolerate a huge hole in the sanctions regime or confront China and risk retaliation involving rare earth minerals that are critical to U.S weapons production. Trump may have decided the military war is paused. Iran is warning him that decision is no longer his alone. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

317,029 次观看 • 1 个月前

My interview with Jim Sciutto CNN International: A. The fundamental question is: What is the administration’s endgame with Iran? Right now, that remains unclear. Is the objective to weaken Iran, bring down the regime, force Tehran to capitulate, or ultimately return to negotiations and reach an agreement? These are very different objectives that require very different strategies. Until Washington defines what success actually looks like, it is difficult to understand where this conflict is heading or how it is supposed to end. B. Economic pressure is a tool, not an objective, and certainly not an exit strategy. Without a realistic diplomatic off-ramp, maximum economic pressure is more likely to produce escalation than capitulation. The assumption that Washington can continue squeezing Tehran while indefinitely preserving the current status quo is simply unrealistic. Iran has agency in this conflict. Tehran will look for ways to impose costs on the United States and its regional partners. So even if the administration wants to freeze the conflict at its current level, Iran has no reason to accommodate that preference. Washington does not control the escalation ladder by itself. C. Meanwhile, much of the discussion in Washington is focused on the Strait of Hormu which, we should remember, was open before the war, while the strategic problems that helped produce this conflict remain unresolved. The most important is Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, the nuclear challenge may now be more dangerous than it was before the war. Ali Khamenei was deeply hostile to the United States and Israel, but he was also extremely cautious about crossing the nuclear threshold. His removal has changed the decision-making environment in Tehran. With the IRGC now wielding greater influence, the possibility that Iran could decide to move toward a nuclear weapon has become more serious. cannot build a strategy around the assumption that the Iranian regime will collapse. That is not a strategy; it is wishful thinking. Economic pressure, even severe economic pressure, does not guarantee regime change. In fact, it could produce the opposite effect: triggering a nationalist backlash, strengthening the regime’s narrative that Iran is under external attack, and giving the leadership additional justification to crack down internally. Regime change may happen, but Washington cannot make it the central assumption on which its Iran strategy rests. U.S. policy has to be built around the Iran that exists today, not the Iran Washington hopes might emerge tomorrow. E. For the nuclear thtrat - That creates an enormous problem for Israel. It is difficult to imagine any Israeli government simply accepting an Iranian nuclear program moving toward weaponization. So ending the current fighting without addressing the nuclear issue would not resolve the underlying conflict. It could leave Washington and Jerusalem facing an even more dangerous crisis down the road. #IranWar‌ #iran #thebrief

Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش

15,414 次观看 • 24 天前