Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Trump’s unpredictability has become predictable. The pattern is now familiar: 1. Issue a maximalist threat or ultimatum 2. Prepare major military action 3. Pause or cancel the escalation 4. Announce that diplomacy could deliver a rapid breakthrough. Plus Iran’s more recent pre-emptive attack on a US base in Jordan... show more

Parham Ghobadi

11,464 subscribers

27,633 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 19

Фото профиля Traci Burgess

Traci Burgess1 месяц назад

@RebeccaNel79339 Before this mess is over I want a vid of Trump on his knees begging Iranians for mercy.

Фото профиля gotz1981

gotz19811 месяц назад

Trump is joke a proper clown 🤡

Фото профиля Olive Green

Olive Green1 месяц назад

@MartineBBC Absolutely stunning in those magical glasses MC you are so special 👓❤️

Фото профиля Abdo Dameen MSc

Abdo Dameen MSc1 месяц назад

The issue i find with this take is that it’s very simple and lacks any depth and gains all of its momentum from a reactionary approach. The Iranian do not care what he says. The Iranian know what they need to do and they aren’t looking at war from a speculative narrative. They have control over the strait, no oil is going out, the US dollar will lose value, the American allies in the region can’t do anything and soon enough the American economy will suffer and then America will be force to make a favourable deal with Iran that will make Iran the 4 world power. Anything else and Iran will send the world back to 1910s and a global recession.

Фото профиля Zulqadar Rashid

Zulqadar Rashid1 месяц назад

TACO TACO TACO TACO TACO 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Regards from Pakistan 🇵🇰

Фото профиля Poria🇮🇷

Poria🇮🇷1 месяц назад

That BBC next to your name tells me I shouldn’t even listen to a second of you

Фото профиля Olive Green

Olive Green1 месяц назад

@MartineBBC Pretty in pink the lovely MC 💕

Фото профиля Truth Gunner

Truth Gunner1 месяц назад

So basically, Iran is threatening, so Trump has backed down abandoning the Iranian people for the benefit of Saudi Arabia and Qatar’s economies. He’s got his excuse

Фото профиля John Hill

John Hill1 месяц назад

SMF

Фото профиля DISPLAYMODE Media

DISPLAYMODE Media1 месяц назад

Military Vacuity, explained …

Фото профиля M. H

M. H1 месяц назад

How much damage has been inflicted on Iran? Do you know?? Many bombs have been delivered but no damage. It’s been 6 months. We will soon find out what’s been done

Фото профиля Shane O'Neill

Shane O'Neill1 месяц назад

And there's always the Huge blue and white elephant In the middle of the room Actually directing operations

Фото профиля Prikker

Prikker1 месяц назад

it is ridiculous

Фото профиля Pat Bruno

Pat Bruno1 месяц назад

AGREED 💯💯💯💯💯

Фото профиля Harry mcfalls

Harry mcfalls1 месяц назад

Threaten blink repeat enjoy your TACO

Фото профиля Whatevah

Whatevah1 месяц назад

Iran has spent decades building invisible supply chains and a hidden distributed military infrastructure. These "pulses" are designed to destroy key portions, not all, of what has become known. The "pauses" are critical for intelligence gathering. Identifying leadership, supply chain, data flow changes. Taking out a deeply entrenched opponent takes many such pulses at different pressure points.

Фото профиля simbimbindo

simbimbindo1 месяц назад

Are they not fighting militarily?

Фото профиля John Mills

John Mills1 месяц назад

Just another Groundhog Day

Фото профиля Texas Papa

Texas Papa1 месяц назад

BBC sucks cock

Похожие видео

Following Iran’s pre-emptive attack on Jordan, just moments ago, Iranian channels are now sharing this video of this morning’s speech by Iran’s military spox. He says Iran’s military doctrine has shifted since the 12-Day War toward preemptive strikes. Iran will from now on strike perceived threats before they have the ability to attack. He says recent operations against US positions and anti-Iranian/separatist groups were meant both to deter future attacks and deny the enemy the initiative, and that this policy will continue wherever Iran believes it faces an imminent threat. A few hours later and Iran carried out a pre-emptive attack on US base in Jordan.

Following Iran’s pre-emptive attack on Jordan, just moments ago, Iranian channels are now sharing this video of this morning’s speech by Iran’s military spox. He says Iran’s military doctrine has shifted since the 12-Day War toward preemptive strikes. Iran will from now on strike perceived threats before they have the ability to attack. He says recent operations against US positions and anti-Iranian/separatist groups were meant both to deter future attacks and deny the enemy the initiative, and that this policy will continue wherever Iran believes it faces an imminent threat. A few hours later and Iran carried out a pre-emptive attack on US base in Jordan.

Arya Yadegaar

286,103 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Iran’s IRGC says it struck 4 major targets at a US air base and command-and-control center in Muwaffaq al Salti Airbase, Jordan, using long-range solid-fuel missiles. Iran also launched missiles on on 21 US targets in the region (Kuwait & Bahrain). The IRGC also downed a MQ-9 drone, and warns that any further US action will receive a harsher response. Footage 1: Iran launches Footage 2: Impact at the US 5th Fleet Support base in Bahrain Image 3: circled location of footage 2 Footage 4: Downing of MQ-9 drone

Iran’s IRGC says it struck 4 major targets at a US air base and command-and-control center in Muwaffaq al Salti Airbase, Jordan, using long-range solid-fuel missiles. Iran also launched missiles on on 21 US targets in the region (Kuwait & Bahrain). The IRGC also downed a MQ-9 drone, and warns that any further US action will receive a harsher response. Footage 1: Iran launches Footage 2: Impact at the US 5th Fleet Support base in Bahrain Image 3: circled location of footage 2 Footage 4: Downing of MQ-9 drone

Arya Yadegaar

117,246 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 EXISTENTIAL MOMENT: This is no longer a limited strike — it’s a gamble on the survival of the Iranian regime Military analysis now suggests the scale of the assault on Iran goes far beyond a “short, sharp shock.” Leadership targets. Command structures. Strategic programs. When a state believes its survival is threatened, doctrine changes. Iran has far more missiles than Western defensive interceptors in the region. If Tehran chooses to escalate fully — launching sustained barrages, activating proxies, or targeting global chokepoints — the conflict could widen rapidly. And history offers a warning: Regime change from the air alone is notoriously difficult. The United States may possess overwhelming military power, but prolonged conflict carries risks — supply limits, regional escalation, and political pressure at home. This is the dangerous crossroads: Capitulation… escalation… or off-ramp. The next decisions — in Tehran and Washington — could shape the next decade.

🚨 EXISTENTIAL MOMENT: This is no longer a limited strike — it’s a gamble on the survival of the Iranian regime Military analysis now suggests the scale of the assault on Iran goes far beyond a “short, sharp shock.” Leadership targets. Command structures. Strategic programs. When a state believes its survival is threatened, doctrine changes. Iran has far more missiles than Western defensive interceptors in the region. If Tehran chooses to escalate fully — launching sustained barrages, activating proxies, or targeting global chokepoints — the conflict could widen rapidly. And history offers a warning: Regime change from the air alone is notoriously difficult. The United States may possess overwhelming military power, but prolonged conflict carries risks — supply limits, regional escalation, and political pressure at home. This is the dangerous crossroads: Capitulation… escalation… or off-ramp. The next decisions — in Tehran and Washington — could shape the next decade.

Jim Ferguson

30,178 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran warned that any new attack would trigger a full Gulf shutdown, not a limited retaliation. Fmr. U.S. Col. Larry Wilkerson says that threat, whether fully credible or not, leaves Trump with no clean military option left. "If anyone attacks us, it will be a new Gulf War in the region, will close the Mandeb Strait and will attack." The escalation ladder is disappearing fast.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran warned that any new attack would trigger a full Gulf shutdown, not a limited retaliation. Fmr. U.S. Col. Larry Wilkerson says that threat, whether fully credible or not, leaves Trump with no clean military option left. "If anyone attacks us, it will be a new Gulf War in the region, will close the Mandeb Strait and will attack." The escalation ladder is disappearing fast.

Mario Nawfal

146,207 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Iranian MP: Trump proposed a «pre-arranged exchange of strikes» An Iranian lawmaker claimed that Donald Trump had allegedly offered Tehran a limited, pre-coordinated escalation scenario: the US would strike several targets, Iran would respond «symbolically», and the conflict would then be considered over. According to him, Iran warned that in the event of a real attack, the response would not be «symbolic», but would involve strikes on US targets and facilities in the region.

Iranian MP: Trump proposed a «pre-arranged exchange of strikes» An Iranian lawmaker claimed that Donald Trump had allegedly offered Tehran a limited, pre-coordinated escalation scenario: the US would strike several targets, Iran would respond «symbolically», and the conflict would then be considered over. According to him, Iran warned that in the event of a real attack, the response would not be «symbolic», but would involve strikes on US targets and facilities in the region.

NEXTA

82,999 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump is changing course on Iran, ordering his senior representatives to halt negotiations with Tehran as Washington prepares to replace stop-and-start diplomacy with a longer campaign of sustained economic and military pressure. According to CNN, the administration is simultaneously moving away from the idea of immediately launching another massive wave of strikes. Instead, Trump wants to gradually “strangle” Iran through economic isolation and sustained military pressure, steadily increasing the cost for Tehran while denying it the relief it seeks. The objective is to weaken Iran’s position over time until its leadership becomes more willing to accept Washington’s conditions. CNN had previously reported that the administration was preparing a broader “economic isolation” strategy against Iran. This represents a shift in method rather than a reduction in pressure. Washington appears to be betting that Iran can be forced into concessions without immediately committing the U.S. to another expensive round of large-scale warfare. The strategy gives Trump room to preserve military escalation as a later option while sanctions, the blockade and economic pressure steadily erode Tehran’s ability to sustain the confrontation. The crucial question is whether Iran bends first, or decides that renewed escalation is preferable to being slowly squeezed. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump is changing course on Iran, ordering his senior representatives to halt negotiations with Tehran as Washington prepares to replace stop-and-start diplomacy with a longer campaign of sustained economic and military pressure. According to CNN, the administration is simultaneously moving away from the idea of immediately launching another massive wave of strikes. Instead, Trump wants to gradually “strangle” Iran through economic isolation and sustained military pressure, steadily increasing the cost for Tehran while denying it the relief it seeks. The objective is to weaken Iran’s position over time until its leadership becomes more willing to accept Washington’s conditions. CNN had previously reported that the administration was preparing a broader “economic isolation” strategy against Iran. This represents a shift in method rather than a reduction in pressure. Washington appears to be betting that Iran can be forced into concessions without immediately committing the U.S. to another expensive round of large-scale warfare. The strategy gives Trump room to preserve military escalation as a later option while sanctions, the blockade and economic pressure steadily erode Tehran’s ability to sustain the confrontation. The crucial question is whether Iran bends first, or decides that renewed escalation is preferable to being slowly squeezed. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

13,610 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Glenn Diesen: Iran may no longer let America decide when the war starts For months, the U.S. has held one enormous advantage over Iran: escalation control. Washington can attack, pause, move toward diplomacy, then potentially attack again when conditions are more favorable. Glenn Diesen thinks Tehran is increasingly determined to take that option away. “If the U.S. know they can just stop the fighting whenever they want, then why not try another attack here or there?” His argument is that Iran may now move toward something considerably more dangerous: striking first when it sees preparations for another major U.S. or Israeli attack. Refueling aircraft assembling. Runways becoming active. Forces moving into position. “There's no reason to wait.” Diesen argues Tehran may not even consider such action a preemptive strike because, from its perspective, the war never actually ended. That may also explain the increasingly aggressive behavior around American warships. Diesen believes Iran may previously have avoided hitting them not because it lacked the capability, but because killing large numbers of U.S. sailors would force Washington dramatically higher up the escalation ladder. Now, he says, Tehran appears to be signaling that restraint may have limits. The strategic shift is subtle but potentially enormous: Iran isn't merely trying to deter the next American attack. It's trying to deny Washington the ability to choose when it happens. Glenn Diesen

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Glenn Diesen: Iran may no longer let America decide when the war starts For months, the U.S. has held one enormous advantage over Iran: escalation control. Washington can attack, pause, move toward diplomacy, then potentially attack again when conditions are more favorable. Glenn Diesen thinks Tehran is increasingly determined to take that option away. “If the U.S. know they can just stop the fighting whenever they want, then why not try another attack here or there?” His argument is that Iran may now move toward something considerably more dangerous: striking first when it sees preparations for another major U.S. or Israeli attack. Refueling aircraft assembling. Runways becoming active. Forces moving into position. “There's no reason to wait.” Diesen argues Tehran may not even consider such action a preemptive strike because, from its perspective, the war never actually ended. That may also explain the increasingly aggressive behavior around American warships. Diesen believes Iran may previously have avoided hitting them not because it lacked the capability, but because killing large numbers of U.S. sailors would force Washington dramatically higher up the escalation ladder. Now, he says, Tehran appears to be signaling that restraint may have limits. The strategic shift is subtle but potentially enormous: Iran isn't merely trying to deter the next American attack. It's trying to deny Washington the ability to choose when it happens. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

295,795 просмотров • 15 дней назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's paused the bombing and replaced it with economic warfare, but Iran's response is that Washington no longer gets to decide when the shooting starts again. In a major escalation, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi says Tehran now considers pre-emptive strikes against U.S interests a legitimate option if it believes its national survival is threatened. His argument is remarkably direct: Why should Iran always wait for America to attack first? If Tehran believes another attack is coming, or that American pressure has become existential, Gharibabadi says Iran can act first. And the timing matters. Rubio is reportedly telling regional counterparts that Washington does not currently intend to launch new strikes on Iran, with Trump's pressure instead running through the naval blockade and Operation Economic Outcast. Military action remains available if Iran attacks first. That's precisely what makes Iran's new position so dangerous. Trump appears to believe he can freeze the military conflict while slowly tightening the economic noose around Tehran. But if the sanctions begin seriously biting, or Tehran concludes Washington is preparing another attack, it could choose to strike American interests first. And after the last war, Iran is considerably less intimidated by that prospect. Then there's Trump's other problem: China. Operation Economic Outcast only works if the countries keeping Iran economically connected can be pressured into compliance. But if Beijing refuses, Trump faces an ugly choice: tolerate a huge hole in the sanctions regime or confront China and risk retaliation involving rare earth minerals that are critical to U.S weapons production. Trump may have decided the military war is paused. Iran is warning him that decision is no longer his alone. Brandon Weichert

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's paused the bombing and replaced it with economic warfare, but Iran's response is that Washington no longer gets to decide when the shooting starts again. In a major escalation, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi says Tehran now considers pre-emptive strikes against U.S interests a legitimate option if it believes its national survival is threatened. His argument is remarkably direct: Why should Iran always wait for America to attack first? If Tehran believes another attack is coming, or that American pressure has become existential, Gharibabadi says Iran can act first. And the timing matters. Rubio is reportedly telling regional counterparts that Washington does not currently intend to launch new strikes on Iran, with Trump's pressure instead running through the naval blockade and Operation Economic Outcast. Military action remains available if Iran attacks first. That's precisely what makes Iran's new position so dangerous. Trump appears to believe he can freeze the military conflict while slowly tightening the economic noose around Tehran. But if the sanctions begin seriously biting, or Tehran concludes Washington is preparing another attack, it could choose to strike American interests first. And after the last war, Iran is considerably less intimidated by that prospect. Then there's Trump's other problem: China. Operation Economic Outcast only works if the countries keeping Iran economically connected can be pressured into compliance. But if Beijing refuses, Trump faces an ugly choice: tolerate a huge hole in the sanctions regime or confront China and risk retaliation involving rare earth minerals that are critical to U.S weapons production. Trump may have decided the military war is paused. Iran is warning him that decision is no longer his alone. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

317,029 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Yesterday during For The People Podcast live show, I accurately predicted that Iran would continue its attacks on US allies and assets in the region regardless of Trumps claims that he would not bomb Iran until a deal was reached. This morning, Iran attacked 3 ships. Iran WILL NOT allow the US to determine when or how this war will end. They WILL NOT let the US control the narrative of this conflict. They laid out their military objectives and now are responding as a country facing an existential threat, and that’s because they are. Trump’s bluffs will no longer work. It’s FAFO season.

Yesterday during For The People Podcast live show, I accurately predicted that Iran would continue its attacks on US allies and assets in the region regardless of Trumps claims that he would not bomb Iran until a deal was reached. This morning, Iran attacked 3 ships. Iran WILL NOT allow the US to determine when or how this war will end. They WILL NOT let the US control the narrative of this conflict. They laid out their military objectives and now are responding as a country facing an existential threat, and that’s because they are. Trump’s bluffs will no longer work. It’s FAFO season.

Duopoly Destroyer

15,960 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JUST NOW: President Trump has officially declared that the ceasefire with Iran is OVER!! 🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Commander-in-Chief confirmed that while the United States remains open to continued talks with Tehran, Washington no longer considers the ceasefire to be in effect. The announcement follows a major escalation after Iranian forces critically miscalculated by targeting commercial shipping lanes.😑 With the ceasefire no longer in effect, the United States will ensure the protection of global commerce, maintain maritime security, and respond firmly to any further escalation by Iran.👏

JUST NOW: President Trump has officially declared that the ceasefire with Iran is OVER!! 🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Commander-in-Chief confirmed that while the United States remains open to continued talks with Tehran, Washington no longer considers the ceasefire to be in effect. The announcement follows a major escalation after Iranian forces critically miscalculated by targeting commercial shipping lanes.😑 With the ceasefire no longer in effect, the United States will ensure the protection of global commerce, maintain maritime security, and respond firmly to any further escalation by Iran.👏

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

245,778 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

My interview with Jim Sciutto CNN International: A. The fundamental question is: What is the administration’s endgame with Iran? Right now, that remains unclear. Is the objective to weaken Iran, bring down the regime, force Tehran to capitulate, or ultimately return to negotiations and reach an agreement? These are very different objectives that require very different strategies. Until Washington defines what success actually looks like, it is difficult to understand where this conflict is heading or how it is supposed to end. B. Economic pressure is a tool, not an objective, and certainly not an exit strategy. Without a realistic diplomatic off-ramp, maximum economic pressure is more likely to produce escalation than capitulation. The assumption that Washington can continue squeezing Tehran while indefinitely preserving the current status quo is simply unrealistic. Iran has agency in this conflict. Tehran will look for ways to impose costs on the United States and its regional partners. So even if the administration wants to freeze the conflict at its current level, Iran has no reason to accommodate that preference. Washington does not control the escalation ladder by itself. C. Meanwhile, much of the discussion in Washington is focused on the Strait of Hormu which, we should remember, was open before the war, while the strategic problems that helped produce this conflict remain unresolved. The most important is Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, the nuclear challenge may now be more dangerous than it was before the war. Ali Khamenei was deeply hostile to the United States and Israel, but he was also extremely cautious about crossing the nuclear threshold. His removal has changed the decision-making environment in Tehran. With the IRGC now wielding greater influence, the possibility that Iran could decide to move toward a nuclear weapon has become more serious. cannot build a strategy around the assumption that the Iranian regime will collapse. That is not a strategy; it is wishful thinking. Economic pressure, even severe economic pressure, does not guarantee regime change. In fact, it could produce the opposite effect: triggering a nationalist backlash, strengthening the regime’s narrative that Iran is under external attack, and giving the leadership additional justification to crack down internally. Regime change may happen, but Washington cannot make it the central assumption on which its Iran strategy rests. U.S. policy has to be built around the Iran that exists today, not the Iran Washington hopes might emerge tomorrow. E. For the nuclear thtrat - That creates an enormous problem for Israel. It is difficult to imagine any Israeli government simply accepting an Iranian nuclear program moving toward weaponization. So ending the current fighting without addressing the nuclear issue would not resolve the underlying conflict. It could leave Washington and Jerusalem facing an even more dangerous crisis down the road. #IranWar‌ #iran #thebrief

My interview with Jim Sciutto CNN International: A. The fundamental question is: What is the administration’s endgame with Iran? Right now, that remains unclear. Is the objective to weaken Iran, bring down the regime, force Tehran to capitulate, or ultimately return to negotiations and reach an agreement? These are very different objectives that require very different strategies. Until Washington defines what success actually looks like, it is difficult to understand where this conflict is heading or how it is supposed to end. B. Economic pressure is a tool, not an objective, and certainly not an exit strategy. Without a realistic diplomatic off-ramp, maximum economic pressure is more likely to produce escalation than capitulation. The assumption that Washington can continue squeezing Tehran while indefinitely preserving the current status quo is simply unrealistic. Iran has agency in this conflict. Tehran will look for ways to impose costs on the United States and its regional partners. So even if the administration wants to freeze the conflict at its current level, Iran has no reason to accommodate that preference. Washington does not control the escalation ladder by itself. C. Meanwhile, much of the discussion in Washington is focused on the Strait of Hormu which, we should remember, was open before the war, while the strategic problems that helped produce this conflict remain unresolved. The most important is Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, the nuclear challenge may now be more dangerous than it was before the war. Ali Khamenei was deeply hostile to the United States and Israel, but he was also extremely cautious about crossing the nuclear threshold. His removal has changed the decision-making environment in Tehran. With the IRGC now wielding greater influence, the possibility that Iran could decide to move toward a nuclear weapon has become more serious. cannot build a strategy around the assumption that the Iranian regime will collapse. That is not a strategy; it is wishful thinking. Economic pressure, even severe economic pressure, does not guarantee regime change. In fact, it could produce the opposite effect: triggering a nationalist backlash, strengthening the regime’s narrative that Iran is under external attack, and giving the leadership additional justification to crack down internally. Regime change may happen, but Washington cannot make it the central assumption on which its Iran strategy rests. U.S. policy has to be built around the Iran that exists today, not the Iran Washington hopes might emerge tomorrow. E. For the nuclear thtrat - That creates an enormous problem for Israel. It is difficult to imagine any Israeli government simply accepting an Iranian nuclear program moving toward weaponization. So ending the current fighting without addressing the nuclear issue would not resolve the underlying conflict. It could leave Washington and Jerusalem facing an even more dangerous crisis down the road. #IranWar‌ #iran #thebrief

Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش

15,414 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait... TRUMP MISLED. IRAN ISN'T DOWN AND OUT. IRAN has taken a major step on the escalation ladder and it is releasing video evidence (see below) of attacks on U.S. bases!!! IRGC has claimed attacks on the 1. US Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain 2. Al-Azraq Air Base in Jordan 3.Ali Al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait. Iran says F-35 shelters and command facilities were targeted, while Kuwait confirms air defences are intercepting hostile aerial targets.

Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait... TRUMP MISLED. IRAN ISN'T DOWN AND OUT. IRAN has taken a major step on the escalation ladder and it is releasing video evidence (see below) of attacks on U.S. bases!!! IRGC has claimed attacks on the 1. US Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain 2. Al-Azraq Air Base in Jordan 3.Ali Al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait. Iran says F-35 shelters and command facilities were targeted, while Kuwait confirms air defences are intercepting hostile aerial targets.

Rahul Shivshankar

40,013 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🕊️ Trump is giving Tehran what he calls a final diplomatic window before a possible military escalation. As tensions around the Strait of Hormuz continue to rise, Washington is combining negotiations with an explicit threat of force. According to Bloomberg, President Donald Trump supports an agreement between Iran and Oman that would recognize Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. At the same time, he has reportedly warned Tehran to finalize the deal by Tuesday, saying that failure to do so could trigger devastating U.S. airstrikes. "I want to give them one last chance before total destruction... You'll know everything today or tomorrow," Trump told reporters. The warning was followed within hours by another escalation at sea, as Iran reportedly launched a missile attack against another commercial vessel operating off the coast of Oman. The latest developments suggest that diplomacy and the threat of military action are now unfolding simultaneously, leaving the region at one of its most volatile moments as the deadline set by Washington approaches. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🕊️ Trump is giving Tehran what he calls a final diplomatic window before a possible military escalation. As tensions around the Strait of Hormuz continue to rise, Washington is combining negotiations with an explicit threat of force. According to Bloomberg, President Donald Trump supports an agreement between Iran and Oman that would recognize Iranian sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. At the same time, he has reportedly warned Tehran to finalize the deal by Tuesday, saying that failure to do so could trigger devastating U.S. airstrikes. "I want to give them one last chance before total destruction... You'll know everything today or tomorrow," Trump told reporters. The warning was followed within hours by another escalation at sea, as Iran reportedly launched a missile attack against another commercial vessel operating off the coast of Oman. The latest developments suggest that diplomacy and the threat of military action are now unfolding simultaneously, leaving the region at one of its most volatile moments as the deadline set by Washington approaches. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

17,690 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THE FINAL SETTLEMENT: BEYOND THE "WHACK-A-MOLE" STRATEGY The American political culture has long viewed Iran as the "final piece" to be knocked out, but the old playbook of bombing and withdrawing is officially broken. Iran is no longer interested in a temporary ceasefire that allows the West to rearm and reset. According to Glenn Diesen, Tehran is now pushing for a final settlement to end the threat for good. This shift in logic mirrors the conflict in Ukraine, where "resetting" the war is no longer an option for the opposing side. The U.S. assumes it has escalation dominance, but the reality on the ground suggests a much longer and more costly confrontation than the Trump administration is prepared for. Glenn Diesen

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 THE FINAL SETTLEMENT: BEYOND THE "WHACK-A-MOLE" STRATEGY The American political culture has long viewed Iran as the "final piece" to be knocked out, but the old playbook of bombing and withdrawing is officially broken. Iran is no longer interested in a temporary ceasefire that allows the West to rearm and reset. According to Glenn Diesen, Tehran is now pushing for a final settlement to end the threat for good. This shift in logic mirrors the conflict in Ukraine, where "resetting" the war is no longer an option for the opposing side. The U.S. assumes it has escalation dominance, but the reality on the ground suggests a much longer and more costly confrontation than the Trump administration is prepared for. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

62,252 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE US MILITARY IS DANGEROUSLY STRETCHED THIN AND UNPREPARED FOR A SWARM-STYLE WAR Decades of focus on conventional warfare won't save the U.S. armada from a barrage of sea drones and midget submarines in the Gulf. With munitions already depleted by the conflict in Ukraine, Washington has lost all control over the escalation ladder. Full interview with Glenn Diesen below

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE US MILITARY IS DANGEROUSLY STRETCHED THIN AND UNPREPARED FOR A SWARM-STYLE WAR Decades of focus on conventional warfare won't save the U.S. armada from a barrage of sea drones and midget submarines in the Gulf. With munitions already depleted by the conflict in Ukraine, Washington has lost all control over the escalation ladder. Full interview with Glenn Diesen below

Mario Nawfal

59,798 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Rising tensions aren’t rumors anymore. The US now has 3 aircraft carriers in the Middle East—its biggest buildup in decades—amid a blockade on Iran and failed peace talks. This isn’t just about one leader or one country. It’s a dangerous escalation that could impact the entire world. What is America upto with this massive deployment? Mind games or escalation?

Rising tensions aren’t rumors anymore. The US now has 3 aircraft carriers in the Middle East—its biggest buildup in decades—amid a blockade on Iran and failed peace talks. This isn’t just about one leader or one country. It’s a dangerous escalation that could impact the entire world. What is America upto with this massive deployment? Mind games or escalation?

Megh Updates 🚨™

19,942 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: ESCALATION IN IRAN Strikes inside Iran are intensifying. Explosions reported in Tehran as US and Israeli strikes continue to intensify. Military and strategic targets have been hit as the conflict enters a more dangerous phase. There are growing warnings that critical infrastructure — including power systems — could become targets. If that line is crossed, the consequences will be global.

🚨BREAKING: ESCALATION IN IRAN Strikes inside Iran are intensifying. Explosions reported in Tehran as US and Israeli strikes continue to intensify. Military and strategic targets have been hit as the conflict enters a more dangerous phase. There are growing warnings that critical infrastructure — including power systems — could become targets. If that line is crossed, the consequences will be global.

Jim Ferguson

50,783 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇺🇸CONFIRMED: As the 60-day countdown begins, Trump has fired a fresh warning at Iran: make a deal now, or face consequences you’ll regret. The problem? Tehran has already called America’s bluff. With the US desperate to avoid escalation and Trump himself admitting that a Strait of Hormuz blockade would wreck the global economy - Washington is no longer negotiating from strength. Bottom line: America’s position has become dangerously weak.

🇺🇸CONFIRMED: As the 60-day countdown begins, Trump has fired a fresh warning at Iran: make a deal now, or face consequences you’ll regret. The problem? Tehran has already called America’s bluff. With the US desperate to avoid escalation and Trump himself admitting that a Strait of Hormuz blockade would wreck the global economy - Washington is no longer negotiating from strength. Bottom line: America’s position has become dangerously weak.

Global Strategy

70,067 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 SKIPPING THE ESCALATION LADDER Iran has scrapped the traditional escalation ladder to inflict maximum damage on U.S. bases as early as possible. With the IRGC launching cruise missiles at the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and targeting the Strait of Hormuz, the "opening stage" of this war is already more violent than many predicted. The goal is to make the cost of war so high for all sides that a temporary pause is no longer an option. Analysis by Trita Parsi below

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 SKIPPING THE ESCALATION LADDER Iran has scrapped the traditional escalation ladder to inflict maximum damage on U.S. bases as early as possible. With the IRGC launching cruise missiles at the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and targeting the Strait of Hormuz, the "opening stage" of this war is already more violent than many predicted. The goal is to make the cost of war so high for all sides that a temporary pause is no longer an option. Analysis by Trita Parsi below

Mario Nawfal

117,303 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

21,146 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад