Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“Truthful” statement?

138,440 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Fred Sargeant
Fred Sargeant2 лет назад

Why did you put in quotes words that I literally did not say? Why do you need to bring race into the discussion? What did any trans person do that any gay person owes them anything for? Don't answer in generalities, use citations. There were maybe a dozen or fewer drag queens there during the riot, out of 500-700 predominantly white, gay men (you brought race up) according to historian David Carter and others. What, other than a useless kickline, did they do that mattered? You do know that it was lesbians and gays who did the documented organizing during the riots, don't you? Name one trans organizer and precisely what organizing that they did during the riots.

Фото профиля Storm
Storm2 лет назад

Marsha P Johnson was Malcom Micheals Jr’s drag persona. He was a gay man and transvestite. Not a transwoman.

Фото профиля Sam Collins
Sam Collins2 лет назад

Her fucking hat

Фото профиля Dennis Rader
Dennis Rader2 лет назад

Here is the entire history of trans people prior to their colonization and exploitation of gay people that started in the 1990's. 1. The homosexual transexual, unable to reconcile their sexual orientation with their physical body, transitioned, then went stealth to try and pass as a heterosexual woman. They shunned the gay community and their own homosexuality. 2. The typical heterosexual transvestite, autogynephillic, wouldn't be caught dead in a gay establishment. They hated the gay community, and the most homophobic of the lot. 3. Cross dressers, drag queens, androgynous homosexuals were never considered trans sexual or trans gendered. Gender non conforming is not trans gender. Current historical mythology put forth by the trans community doesn't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny. The most they can come up with is 2 drag queens, that played no part in gay rights.

Фото профиля XxtraEstroGenny
XxtraEstroGenny2 лет назад

OMG. You seriously don’t know who @FredSargeant is? 🙄🤡

Фото профиля Mumma Blue ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ zftg
Mumma Blue ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ zftg2 лет назад

Honor those that came before by not telling lies abt them for your own ends. Honor the person they were and how they described themselves, or YOU dishonor them.

Фото профиля Admiral Invalidator
Admiral Invalidator2 лет назад

Malcolm Michaels Jr. wasn’t trans. He said so himself. Stop using a movement you weren’t part of to hurt children, fetishist.

Фото профиля Ricardo di Pandi
Ricardo di Pandi2 лет назад

MPJ was a gay man, what are you not understanding, chief?

Фото профиля LGB WITH THE T
LGB WITH THE T2 лет назад

Watch the video essay by @CaelanConrad. They explain everything. Fred isn’t a reliable source and does not speak for the LGBT community

Фото профиля The WWE Reject
The WWE Reject2 лет назад

You’re bragging about never having heard of Fred Sargeant?

Похожие видео

The Becker Schools in Minnesota released a statement about the incident where a teacher politically berated one of her students for not agreeing with her political gaslighting. Thankfully, the incident was filmed so it wouldn’t become a ‘he said/she said’ situation that the school system would sweep under the rug. But hey … they may still do just that. In a statement made by the school … Dr Jeremy Schmidt said a lot of contradictory things, while clearing up nothing. “We are maintaining a safe, structured learning environment (blah blah blah) …” —- make that make sense … how is it safe for a student when a teacher SHUTS THEM DOWN for having a different view or opinion than the teachers?! Is that considered part of their ‘structured learning environment’?! No one ever asked the school to PUNISH their entire community of teachers … WeThePeople simply asked that the particular teacher in question be suspended or fired for not providing a safe and respectful environment for her students. As far as ‘truth-seeking’ … she is on video, those are her words and actions … you can’t get anymore truthful than that. So don’t call our eyes or ears deceitful. Without those of us on social media bringing situations like this to the forefront … our schools will continue to get away with indoctrination and we parents are sick of it. All we ask is that our kids be taught: reading, writing, math, real science (not the ‘because I feel’ science), real history (not revisionist history to fit a narrative), civics and respect for our country. Leave activism, teacher’s opinions, teacher’s private life choices OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS. Even professors, from the mostly leftist universities, are beginning to complain that students entering college now can’t even read or have a basic understanding of things. THAT is the failure of our current education system and their activist staff!

C-Reason🇺🇸

140,012 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

AP’s Zeke Miller: “[I]n your first briefing here as press secretary, you committed to speaking to the American people and I quote, “in a transparent way —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— in a truthful way, and an honest way.” KJP: “Yes.” Miller: “[A]nd then in July, here at this podium —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— you were asked about the President pardoning his son, and you said, ‘it's a no, it will be a no, it's a no.’” KJP: “Yes, and that — that is exactly right.” Miller: “So [inaudible] of the President’s son and that pardon —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— it became a yes.” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “I'm wondering if you would like to explain — KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— to us, the American people, really why the information —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— that you provided turned out to not be true?? KJP: “And — and I — and I — and I answered this question on Monday. We spent about 30 minutes on this — almost 30 minutes — roughly 30 minutes on this particular issue, and I'm just going to reiterate what I said — uh — in air — on Air Force One, to your colleagues when I did the gaggle, and look, if you look at his statement, it's pretty comprehensive — uh — the statement that he put out on Sunday when he made the decision to pardon his son Hunter Biden. It — uh — it's — it's in his own voice — uh — I think it takes you through his thinking, and he did. He wrestled with this. He wrestled with this — uh — and again, he said in his statement in his own voice that he made that decision this past weekend, and the fact is — uh — when you think about how the president got to this decision, circumstances have changed. They have — and a couple of things, and I said this — uh — I said this — uh — on Monday as well. Republicans said they weren't going to let up — uh — weren't going to stop. Recently announced Trump appointees for law enforcement have said on the campaign that they — they were out for retribution, and I think we should believe their words, right? We should believe what they say. Uh — the sentencing was coming up, as you all know. There was a sentencing coming up and the President said this in his statement that Hunter and his family had been through enough. Enough is enough, and he wrestled with these circumstances — uh — these change in circumstances ultimately — uh — and the combination of that — uh — the present changing his mind and issuing certainly led to the present changing his mind and issuing this pardon, and one thing that I do want to point to, which I think is important, is what Congressman James Clyburn said — uh — when he was interviewed. He said, I am absolutely okay with it. Uh — I don't know how many people urge him to do so, but I did. Uh — he seemed to be reticent about it. This is what Clyburn said — uh — when he spoke to the President two weeks ago — uh — but I emphasize continuing his — his quote — uh — emphasized the fact that we as fathers have obligations to our children, so that was a conversation that the congressman himself had with the President two — two weeks ago, said that the President was reticent when he encouraged the President to do so, and this weekend — uh — he thought about it — uh — and he weighed, he — it was not an easy decision to — to come to — and he put out a comprehensive — uh — comprehensive statement, and I would certainly — um — you know, offer that up to folks out there who are wondering, I would say, please read the president's, uh, President's response to this in full.”

Curtis Houck

102,998 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 Ilhan Omar Spits on Charlie Kirk’s Grave At the terror-tied CAIR conference, radical Rep. Ilhan Omar — accused of marrying her own brother to commit immigration fraud — stood on stage and spewed this filth: ⚠️ She compared Republicans’ criticism of Islam to the way Nazis spoke about Jews. The irony? Islam literally allied with Hitler to exterminate the Jews. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem worked hand-in-hand with the Nazis. 👉 The Quran itself contains more Jew-hatred than Mein Kampf — commanding Muslims to curse, fight, and kill Jews until the end of days. ⚠️ She pointed to Charlie Kirk’s tweet — “Islam is the sword that will cut the throat of Western civilization” — and twisted this truthful statement into a “call to attack Muslims.” ⚠️ She claimed that repeating Kirk’s words “puts every Muslim in danger” — while Kirk himself was slaughtered by a leftist for daring to criticize the Left, which is working hand-in-hand with Islam to destroy the West. ⚠️ She bragged about her so-called “Islamophobia Act” to silence Americans — another step toward dragging our nation under Sharia. ⚠️ She ordered Muslims to flood social media with her victimhood narrative. Boo-Hoo NO ONE CARES! This is grotesque propaganda: 🔺Hijack the Holocaust to play the victim. 🔺 Swipe at a slain critic even in death. 🔺 Demand censorship of anyone who dares speak truth about Islam. Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking. Omar’s response? Spit on his grave and weaponize his words.

Amy Mek

92,701 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

SAMMY GYAMFI HAS TRANSFORMED THE GOLDBOD, LET’S BE TRUTHFUL — KWAME BAFFOE ABRONYE “See the huge statement by GoldBoD. If I mention the name Lawyer Sammy Gyamfi, say eeiiiii!!. Even the NPP are celebrating his achievements (Oko Boye, Abronye, etc.). Sammy, we can’t thank you enough. God bless you. Your support, guidance, and care will always remain on our lips. You have lifted the bar beyond our expectations!!! Everything you touch gets a new look. I dedicate this paragraph to you. I will do another special dedication another time. You deserve it.” — Excerpt from Godwin Ako Gunn’s write up extolling the exemplary leadership of Sammy Gyamfi at the GoldBoD. The unwarranted flaks cannot dowse the flames of goodwill. The haste to impose losses at the doorstep of GoldBoD is not only misguided but mischievous. If to incur supposed losses of $214M is all that entails to sustain the Cedi, drop inflation, plummet policy rate, appreciate sovereign credit ratings, reduce cost of living, minimise cost of fuel, and reap in $10B forex (ahead of IMF target in 3 years) to cushion the economy — then YES, Ghana is on RESET. We saw huge and hefty losses few years ago without any commensurating economic benefits. All the metrixes headed downwards and negative-facing. It begs for answer: what then necessitated the losses? Did we loss those hefty sums of monies to nefarious economic hardships, reckless spending, unbearable cost of living, Cedi depreciation spree, or junk credit ratings status? That summarizes the story and the unending flawful fulminations. Look, the attached video is Kwame Baffoe’s concession to Sammy Gyamfi’s transformation of Nkrumah’s 1963 GDMB, Rawlings’ 1989 PMMC to Mahama’s 2025 GoldBoD.

MPK 𓃵

12,324 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

How Much Profit Are You Allowed To Make In Islam. "The jurists (Islamic scholars) have a very interesting statement. They say you can make as much profit as you want (it’s not haram), but it’s disliked to do so, although it is valid. The amount of profit to make is obviously a very subjective matter, but at the end of the day, there are a few things that are prohibited. For example, hoarding is prohibited, and in this context, hoarding means accumulating staple products. I don't mean, for example, that if someone knows Louis Vuitton is going to close down tomorrow, they go and buy up all the bags that will be on sale, knowing they will become very expensive next month. If they buy the bags and wait about four months before selling them for ten times the price, that’s fine because luxury products are not staple products. However, if someone does this with wheat, salt, or any essential items people need, hoarding them until the supply diminishes and then selling them when people need them most, that is not compassionate. These points must be kept in mind for traders to be successful. The point being made by The Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is that there is a lot of inclination and temptation in business to do things wrong to make an extra buck." ~ Mufti Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “The honest and trustworthy merchant will be with the prophets, the truthful, and the martyrs in the afterlife.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1209

Akbar Zab

33,113 просмотров • 2 лет назад

To inform the Filipino people—especially in light of Senator Cayetano’s concerns that we are not being fully truthful with our fellow citizens—let me clarify that Philippine Coast Guard vessels never approach any of China’s illegally reclaimed and occupied maritime features across the West Philippine Sea, unless the honorable senator believes that Bajo de Masinloc, Escoda Shoal, Ayungin Shoal, and Pag-asa Island are rightfully Chinese territory. On the contrary, it is the PRC that constantly engages in harassment and dangerous maneuvers CLOSE TO Philippine occupied features and waters. It is up to the honorable senator whether he chooses to believe PRC talking points filled with falsehoods or the Philippine Coast Guard personnel and independent journalists who present clear and incontrovertible evidence—photos, videos, and verifiable records. However, let me just note—we never venture closer to features occupied by Vietnam, Malaysia, and especially Panganiban Reef and Zamora Reef because such is irresponsible and neither grounded in the 2002 ASEAN-China DOC nor aligned with Philippine interests. Likewise, the Vietnamese and the Malaysians accord us the same treatment. The PRC is the only party to the South China Sea dispute not respecting the provisions of the DOC, and of the UNCLOS. The honorable senator’s statement simply muddles the issue, which whether intentional or not, makes China very happy as our political leaders doubt our own rights and actions. I cannot understand why it is so difficult for the senator to clearly and unambiguously call out PRC aggression. Mr. Senator, in case you missed last week’s developments—or your staff failed to brief you—the most recent MDA flight was challenged by a PLA Navy warship at a distance of 48 nautical miles off the coast of Agno, Pangasinan.

Jay Tarriela

60,517 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Western Lensman

41,368,483 просмотров • 1 год назад

ESSENTIAL VIEWING FOR THE ENTIRE WORLD! What happened must never happen again. The perpetrators must be held accountable New Australian Film - WITNESS STATEMENT The Greatest Crimes in Australia’s History – The Story is Confronting Witness Statement 1 January 2025, has been released, telling the story of the most serious crimes ever committed in Australian history. The documentary addresses all Australian Police, State and Federal, and calls on them to identify and investigate alleged crimes and pursue prosecution of the offenders, without fear or favour. The film outlines numerous facts supported by indisputable data and evidence, of alleged criminal actions perpetrated on the people of Australia through the approval, promotion, mandating and injection of Covid-19 vaccines. It presents data, information, expert testimony and referenced evidence, in relation to the victims, the alleged crimes, the alleged offenders, the weapons used, possible motives, and the intent and means of the offenders. Numerous facts predominantly from Australian sources support the argument, including from our own Prof Ian Brighthope, Dr Phillip Altman, and Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan. Other foreign experts contribute including the famous English cancer specialist Professor Angus Dalgleish, the UK cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, plus Dr Paul Marik and Dr Peter McCullough from the United States, and many more. You will also hear from many of the brave Australian politicians who tried to expose the truth about the Covid-19 pandemic and vaccines, including Senator Malcolm Roberts and Senator Gerard Rennick, as well as current and former members of parliament, Russell Broadbent, Craig Kelly and George Christensen. The facts presented clearly show that there were many serious departures from reasonable standards of conduct and care and unlawful actions, which caused significant harm to Australian men, women and children. But the film is also a beacon of light for those who have not yet been exposed to truthful media reports about the true risks and harms of the Covid-19 injections. These are not conventional vaccines. They are according to global experts, not vaccines, but gene therapy bioweapons. The truth is already in the public domain, but sourcing the information can be challenging for those who don’t know where to look. This documentary strings the publicly available data together in a way that is easy to access and understand. After watching this documentary, the misleading slogan ‘Safe and Effective’, will ring untrue - loud and clear - as the lies are exposed. The documentary is lengthy at 2.5 hours, but it is presented in 9 parts, so that you can pause after, or during, each section to reflect and consider the information carefully. Once you press play, you will want to watch to the end. The documentary has been mailed to the Federal Attorney General, Mark Dreyfus, and all State and Territory Police Commissioners, with a call to action to watch the documentary and take action to investigate the alleged crimes and prosecute the offenders. A link to the film will also be emailed to our elected representatives at Council, State and Federal level, to ensure that they too can be informed of the facts and take action to protect the people from further harm. The film can be viewed now at : Click here for film trailer. For media inquiries contact Debra Leigh Email: [email protected] credit to Debra Leigh /GlobalTruthNetwork / CMNnews /

Max Freedom

16,033 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk just described the future of AI in a single sentence. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell.” That’s not a metaphor. That’s a blueprint. He wasn’t describing science fiction. He was describing what happens when the only thing AI is trained to maximize is revenue. Musk: “We don’t want this to be sort of a profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” The richest man on Earth is telling you the default path of AI leads somewhere no one should want to go. And he’s the only one building as if he actually believes it. This is the part people miss about xAI. Everyone talks about the compute. The clusters. The talent wars. The benchmarks. Nobody talks about the philosophy underneath all of it. Because philosophy doesn’t trend. But philosophy is the only thing that determines whether AI serves humanity or harvests it. Musk: “Let’s make the future good for the humans. Because we are humans.” Not because it’s good PR. Not because regulators are watching. Not because it polls well with users. Because we are the ones who have to live inside whatever these systems become. Every major AI lab talks about safety. Every single one has an alignment page. A responsible AI team. A set of principles that read beautifully in print. But the structure tells you everything the mission statement won’t. When you convert a nonprofit into a for-profit worth hundreds of billions, the values were already chosen. The about page is decoration. The cap table is the constitution. Musk understood this before anyone. It’s why he walked away from OpenAI. Not because the technology scared him. Because the governance did. He watched a nonprofit built to protect humanity restructure itself into a vehicle designed to concentrate wealth. That’s the real story of AI right now. Not which model is smartest. Which model is answerable. Accountability doesn’t live in a blog post. It lives in what happens when doing the right thing and doing the profitable thing point in opposite directions. Every AI company will face that fork. Most already chose. Musk is the only builder on Earth constructing an AI company with the open admission that the default outcome is something no one should want. That’s not idealism. That’s the only honest engineering left. Musk: “A profit-maximizing demon from hell that just never stops.” He said it almost casually. But that sentence is the most truthful description of misaligned AI any builder has ever spoken out loud. Because the demon doesn’t announce itself. It optimizes politely. It scales quietly. It compounds without a sound. And by the time you notice, the architecture is the authority and the authority doesn’t answer to you. The question was never whether AI would become powerful. The question was always who would be holding the wheel when it did. And whether they’d still remember what it felt like to be the species it was built to serve.

Dustin

34,540 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад