正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

14,755 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Masboy Katulistiwa - マスボーイ・カトゥリスティワ 的头像
Masboy Katulistiwa - マスボーイ・カトゥリスティワ2 年前

Trypophobia adalah fobia atau rasa takut terhadap objek atau gambar yang berlubang banyak.

Agus Susanto IV 的头像
Agus Susanto IV2 年前

👍👍👍👍👍👍

Solar Heavy 的头像
Solar Heavy1 年前

does this remind you of something?

🌻 的头像
🌻2 年前

Tanganku gatel pen mecetin

Kang Timbul🇮🇩🇵🇸 的头像
Kang Timbul🇮🇩🇵🇸2 年前

Itu penyebabnya apa ya?? Apa salah satunya karena islam phobia ya? 🤣🤣

🅁🄰🄳🄴🄽🄽🄸🄽🄶🅁🄰🅃 的头像
🅁🄰🄳🄴🄽🄽🄸🄽🄶🅁🄰🅃2 年前

Ini biasnya terjadi pada pejabat Yg takut dan kesusahan yg berlebihan... Mumgkin di pundak mukidi dan para mentrinya ada seperti ini

Kandar Tanjung 的头像
Kandar Tanjung2 年前

Itu yang dicapit itu sampe sebesar biji pepaya, . Mungkin itu sejenis parasit

Gus Choy Markochoy 🍉🦉 的头像
Gus Choy Markochoy 🍉🦉2 年前

🤔,,,?

Roesmartint 的头像
Roesmartint2 年前

Serem bang

Ibow gitu ajah 的头像
Ibow gitu ajah2 年前

Koq sampai bolong2 ya.... 🤔

Bakul Ronde 的头像
Bakul Ronde2 年前

Kayak sarang lebah

相关视频

Trypophobia triggered
0:26

Sensitive content

Trypophobia triggered

Movies & tv

248,979 次观看 • 9 个月前

Envy needs an ideology, and socialism has always been happy to provide one. Mises wrote a whole book about this in 1956, The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, and the diagnosis holds up: people who resent the outcomes of voluntary exchange will always search for a doctrine that transforms their resentment into virtue. The woke left found theirs. Notice what wokeism and socialism share at the root. Both start from the premise that unequal outcomes prove injustice. You earned more than your neighbor? Exploitation. One group outperforms another in median income? Systemic oppression. Neither doctrine ever asks whether people made different choices, took different risks, or produced different value for others. Asking that question would ruin everything, because the entire project depends on assigning blame rather than understanding prices, profit, and loss. Once you accept that unequal outcomes equal injustice, you need a corrector. Someone powerful. Someone with the authority to override contracts, seize property, and redistribute according to a moral hierarchy the planners themselves define. That job description has exactly one applicant: the state. This is why the woke activist and the socialist always arrive at the same policy desk, demanding rent control in New York, wealth taxes in Sacramento, hiring quotas in every HR department from Seattle to Brussels. Marcuse and the Frankfurt School figured out decades ago that the Western worker refused to play his assigned role as revolutionary. He got rich instead. Capitalism handed him a car, a house, and air conditioning, and he stopped listening to men promising utopia through expropriation. The revolutionaries needed a new client base. Class became identity, but the machinery stayed identical: oppressor and oppressed, guilt and grievance, revolution and rule. The love affair with socialism, then, follows logically. Wokeism supplies the moral demand for coercion; socialism supplies the economic apparatus of coercion. Neither can survive in a world of private property and voluntary exchange, because in that world you rise by serving customers, not by capturing committees. Venezuela ran this experiment from 1999 onward. The grocery shelves reported the results.

Handre

47,897 次观看 • 19 小时前