正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Tucker Carlson issues two dire warnings as the Iran conflict rapidly escalates. “If it blows up, that’s not a solvable problem.” “That’s the end of everything that we know.” First, Tucker warned that if Iran hits Israel with a hypersonic missile, Israel could respond with nuclear weapons, something the...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,976,113 subscribers

641,464 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

⭕️ Tucker Carlson tells The New York Times why he calls U.S. President Donald Trump a “hostage” to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: “Trump said, ‘I want a negotiated settlement [with Iran].’ Israel stopped the settlement.” He explained that the U.S.-Iran ceasefire terms included a requirement that Israel stop attacking southern Lebanon. “You can’t use the Iran war as a pretext for stealing more land from a sovereign country. That’s not your country,” he said. When Israel continued its attacks, Carlson noted that “Trump refused to even criticize Netanyahu in public.” “Are you joking? That’s slavery. That is total control of one man by another.” Tucker Carlson | Lulu NYT
3:53

⭕️ Tucker Carlson tells The New York Times why he calls U.S. President Donald Trump a “hostage” to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: “Trump said, ‘I want a negotiated settlement [with Iran].’ Israel stopped the settlement.” He explained that the U.S.-Iran ceasefire terms included a requirement that Israel stop attacking southern Lebanon. “You can’t use the Iran war as a pretext for stealing more land from a sovereign country. That’s not your country,” he said. When Israel continued its attacks, Carlson noted that “Trump refused to even criticize Netanyahu in public.” “Are you joking? That’s slavery. That is total control of one man by another.” Tucker Carlson | Lulu NYT

Drop Site

358,966 次观看 • 3 个月前

The GOP must be destroyed and replaced with a populist coalition. Another name for that is post-constitutional mob rule. “The right has to give up on free markets.” My problem with Tucker isn’t the Jew hatred, that’s between him and God, although I have the right to call him out on it and I will everyday. My problem with Tucker and his merry little band of comrades is that they are authoritarians who don’t believe in freedom and liberty. That is what makes them dangerous because they use the Israel issue and the Jew hatred as a scapegoat to get you to be so frustrated and angry that you give up your freaking civil liberties and your freedoms and give in to authoritarians. That’s why Tucker is dangerous not because he’s a Jew hater. The only way America Only works is if we are going to be conquering the rest of the world and bringing them down under us and if that’s what the goal is, then I would like to hear people say it openly and honestly.
4:39

The GOP must be destroyed and replaced with a populist coalition. Another name for that is post-constitutional mob rule. “The right has to give up on free markets.” My problem with Tucker isn’t the Jew hatred, that’s between him and God, although I have the right to call him out on it and I will everyday. My problem with Tucker and his merry little band of comrades is that they are authoritarians who don’t believe in freedom and liberty. That is what makes them dangerous because they use the Israel issue and the Jew hatred as a scapegoat to get you to be so frustrated and angry that you give up your freaking civil liberties and your freedoms and give in to authoritarians. That’s why Tucker is dangerous not because he’s a Jew hater. The only way America Only works is if we are going to be conquering the rest of the world and bringing them down under us and if that’s what the goal is, then I would like to hear people say it openly and honestly.

Insurrection Barbie

44,208 次观看 • 8 个月前

Tucker Carlson calls out the UK as a “police state” for cracking down on free speech. In 2023, the UK arrested over 12,000 people for speech violations—compared to just 3,319 in Russia, often portrayed as the world's worst regime. Tucker: “If your government is willing to arrest you for saying things they don’t like, if your government is arresting you for criticising them… one way or another, you need a new government. “If there is any justification for revolution, it’s that. That’s unacceptable. That’s tyranny. A government that does that is not a legitimate government. It has absolutely no right to do that, and it should be stopped from doing that immediately. That’s the red line.”
5:05

Tucker Carlson calls out the UK as a “police state” for cracking down on free speech. In 2023, the UK arrested over 12,000 people for speech violations—compared to just 3,319 in Russia, often portrayed as the world's worst regime. Tucker: “If your government is willing to arrest you for saying things they don’t like, if your government is arresting you for criticising them… one way or another, you need a new government. “If there is any justification for revolution, it’s that. That’s unacceptable. That’s tyranny. A government that does that is not a legitimate government. It has absolutely no right to do that, and it should be stopped from doing that immediately. That’s the red line.”

J Stewart

13,168 次观看 • 10 个月前

Many are being intentionally dishonest and obtuse. Tucker claims to be a journalist, but when he sat down with Nick Fuentes, he did not ask about the fact that Nick openly: -Worships Hitler -Hates jews, women, minorities, etc. -Hates Trump -Talks about raping women/children That’s the problem with all this. Instead of Tucker confronting the fact that Nick is a heinous and pathetic individual who openly says he wants to destroy MAGA and TPUSA, Tucker just completely glossed over all that and tried to make Nick appear to be a nice guy… That’s the problem. Tucker knows exactly what he is fucking doing, and so do all the scumbag Conservative influencers like Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh. They are all playing dumb, and then have the audacity to call it “infighting”. Make no mistake, if we do not destroy these woke-Right losers and allow the Left to put us in the same basket, we will lose everything, and the Left will destroy this country.
1:36

Many are being intentionally dishonest and obtuse. Tucker claims to be a journalist, but when he sat down with Nick Fuentes, he did not ask about the fact that Nick openly: -Worships Hitler -Hates jews, women, minorities, etc. -Hates Trump -Talks about raping women/children That’s the problem with all this. Instead of Tucker confronting the fact that Nick is a heinous and pathetic individual who openly says he wants to destroy MAGA and TPUSA, Tucker just completely glossed over all that and tried to make Nick appear to be a nice guy… That’s the problem. Tucker knows exactly what he is fucking doing, and so do all the scumbag Conservative influencers like Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh. They are all playing dumb, and then have the audacity to call it “infighting”. Make no mistake, if we do not destroy these woke-Right losers and allow the Left to put us in the same basket, we will lose everything, and the Left will destroy this country.

Clandestine

55,406 次观看 • 9 个月前

Seyed Mohammad Marandi: If they want to destroy Iran’s key infrastructure, that’s a possibility. But then Iran will destroy all key infrastructure in this region—everything. All the oil and gas installations in the Persian Gulf region and in the Caucasus will be gone, finished. They won’t be damaged; they’ll be destroyed. And that will mean that the key infrastructure of the United States will collapse. The world will collapse because we will enter a severe global economic depression. If that’s what the United States wants, that’s what it will get. But the world will know that it’s the United States that did this. It will know that the Zionists did this. It will know that Netanyahu did this. Because Iran does not want war. Iran does not want to expand the war. We want to live in peace. We want the rights of Palestinians, the Lebanese, and the people of Syria to be restored.
1:00

Seyed Mohammad Marandi: If they want to destroy Iran’s key infrastructure, that’s a possibility. But then Iran will destroy all key infrastructure in this region—everything. All the oil and gas installations in the Persian Gulf region and in the Caucasus will be gone, finished. They won’t be damaged; they’ll be destroyed. And that will mean that the key infrastructure of the United States will collapse. The world will collapse because we will enter a severe global economic depression. If that’s what the United States wants, that’s what it will get. But the world will know that it’s the United States that did this. It will know that the Zionists did this. It will know that Netanyahu did this. Because Iran does not want war. Iran does not want to expand the war. We want to live in peace. We want the rights of Palestinians, the Lebanese, and the people of Syria to be restored.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

535,387 次观看 • 5 个月前

BREAKING: Trump says Tucker called him to apologize over opposition—claims even Tucker agrees Iran can’t have nukes. “Tucker’s a nice guy.” “He called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong.” “And I appreciated that.” “If they think that it’s okay for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, then they should oppose me—but nobody thinks it’s okay.” “I don’t think Tucker says it’s okay.” “I did ask Tucker, I said, are you okay with nuclear weapons being in the hands of Iran? And he sort of didn’t like that! He sorta didn’t like that.” “And I said, well, if it’s okay with you, then you and I have a difference. But it’s really not okay with him.”
2:11

BREAKING: Trump says Tucker called him to apologize over opposition—claims even Tucker agrees Iran can’t have nukes. “Tucker’s a nice guy.” “He called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong.” “And I appreciated that.” “If they think that it’s okay for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, then they should oppose me—but nobody thinks it’s okay.” “I don’t think Tucker says it’s okay.” “I did ask Tucker, I said, are you okay with nuclear weapons being in the hands of Iran? And he sort of didn’t like that! He sorta didn’t like that.” “And I said, well, if it’s okay with you, then you and I have a difference. But it’s really not okay with him.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

523,915 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.
1:36

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

Joel Mowbray

658,118 次观看 • 5 个月前

Andrew Tate: “If you are naïve enough to believe that there are good guys and bad guys in wars and it’s as simple as good & bad… you need to do a little more investigation” Tucker Carlson: “That’s the truest thing.. Anyone who doesn’t understand that should shut the f*ck up”
0:56

Andrew Tate: “If you are naïve enough to believe that there are good guys and bad guys in wars and it’s as simple as good & bad… you need to do a little more investigation” Tucker Carlson: “That’s the truest thing.. Anyone who doesn’t understand that should shut the f*ck up”

ALX 🇺🇸

8,060,507 次观看 • 3 年前

Tucker Carlson: If you are the strongest military in the world, why can’t you force Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz? We’re really not as powerful as we said we were. That’s bad for us, but it’s also dangerous because it invites aggression. We need to fix that by being honest about what just happened. No more lying.
0:39

Tucker Carlson: If you are the strongest military in the world, why can’t you force Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz? We’re really not as powerful as we said we were. That’s bad for us, but it’s also dangerous because it invites aggression. We need to fix that by being honest about what just happened. No more lying.

Anton Gerashchenko

32,818 次观看 • 4 个月前

ABC asks Netanyahu: "The NYT reports you told Trump that Iran's ballistic missile program could be destroyed in weeks w/o the Strait of Hormuz shut down, and there could be regime change." - Netanyahu: "That wasn’t my early assessment and that’s an incorrect statement of what I said. I thought that we have to act to make sure that Iran doesn’t get nuclear weapons because if we don’t it’s like having a cancer and if you don’t take it out you’re going to die. We’re discussing how to make sure that it doesn’t come back. It doesn’t metastasize. That’s the first thing...."
1:43

ABC asks Netanyahu: "The NYT reports you told Trump that Iran's ballistic missile program could be destroyed in weeks w/o the Strait of Hormuz shut down, and there could be regime change." - Netanyahu: "That wasn’t my early assessment and that’s an incorrect statement of what I said. I thought that we have to act to make sure that Iran doesn’t get nuclear weapons because if we don’t it’s like having a cancer and if you don’t take it out you’re going to die. We’re discussing how to make sure that it doesn’t come back. It doesn’t metastasize. That’s the first thing...."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

20,639 次观看 • 12 天前

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tucker warns that a potential war with Iran could quickly expand beyond the Middle East, raising the stakes to a global level. He points to China’s strategic alignment with Iran, suggesting Beijing could be pulled in politically, economically, or even militarily. It’s possible that such an escalation would stretch U.S. resources thin while opening multiple fronts simultaneously. Tucker frames the risk bluntly: this may not be a conflict the U.S. can realistically sustain or win. Tucker Carlson
5:04

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tucker warns that a potential war with Iran could quickly expand beyond the Middle East, raising the stakes to a global level. He points to China’s strategic alignment with Iran, suggesting Beijing could be pulled in politically, economically, or even militarily. It’s possible that such an escalation would stretch U.S. resources thin while opening multiple fronts simultaneously. Tucker frames the risk bluntly: this may not be a conflict the U.S. can realistically sustain or win. Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

663,518 次观看 • 3 个月前

In a very revealing conversation, Tucker and Buckley Carlson discuss something many people may not know: Donald Trump is obsessed with WASPs. Why could that be? Tucker: “He hates wasps, but he’s also obsessed with them. I’ve talked to him about it many times…he’s very fixated on the WASP thing and does talk about it a lot.” Buckley: “There’s another group in America that’s kind of fixated on the WASPs too.” Tucker: “Yeah, well yeah, I’ve noticed that too.” Buckley: “Equal fervor and hostility.” Tucker: “If you have the total displacement after over 200 years of the American ruling class by a new group, that’s a big thing, but nobody says a word about it. And I’m not even taking sides in it. Though, you know, obviously I have a side to take…But like that happened. It happened over 40 years and now it’s complete. And like, no one can say that that happened. Are you kidding?”
5:09

In a very revealing conversation, Tucker and Buckley Carlson discuss something many people may not know: Donald Trump is obsessed with WASPs. Why could that be? Tucker: “He hates wasps, but he’s also obsessed with them. I’ve talked to him about it many times…he’s very fixated on the WASP thing and does talk about it a lot.” Buckley: “There’s another group in America that’s kind of fixated on the WASPs too.” Tucker: “Yeah, well yeah, I’ve noticed that too.” Buckley: “Equal fervor and hostility.” Tucker: “If you have the total displacement after over 200 years of the American ruling class by a new group, that’s a big thing, but nobody says a word about it. And I’m not even taking sides in it. Though, you know, obviously I have a side to take…But like that happened. It happened over 40 years and now it’s complete. And like, no one can say that that happened. Are you kidding?”

Fractured Light

187,592 次观看 • 3 个月前

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”
1:54

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

Open Source Intel

140,521 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Tucker Carlson on Rubio’s justification for the preemptive strikes on Iran: “He says we didn’t know Iran was going to attack. Iran would only retaliate if Israel struck first… And in that retaliation, U.S. forces could be targeted. So the "imminent threat" being described is ISRAEL, NOT IRAN.”
0:50

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Tucker Carlson on Rubio’s justification for the preemptive strikes on Iran: “He says we didn’t know Iran was going to attack. Iran would only retaliate if Israel struck first… And in that retaliation, U.S. forces could be targeted. So the "imminent threat" being described is ISRAEL, NOT IRAN.”

Lord Bebo

52,056 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tucker Carlson asks Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli Knesset and interim president, what would happen if Al-Aqsa mosque was to be destroyed. He responded: If it happened, that would be the end of the justification for the existence of the State of Israel. And it would trigger the masses all over the Muslim world, possibly toppling a few regimes and bringing different ones to power, to the point that the world order as we know it would no longer be recognisable.
2:36

Tucker Carlson asks Avraham Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli Knesset and interim president, what would happen if Al-Aqsa mosque was to be destroyed. He responded: If it happened, that would be the end of the justification for the existence of the State of Israel. And it would trigger the masses all over the Muslim world, possibly toppling a few regimes and bringing different ones to power, to the point that the world order as we know it would no longer be recognisable.

DOAM

19,459 次观看 • 4 个月前

“Somebody shorted the oil markets today by hundreds of millions of dollars exactly 20 minutes before Trump made his announcement that everything was going to be great. And if you see that once, it could be a coincidence. But that’s happened at least three times, if not more, since the war began. That’s a pattern.” “And what that suggests is that there’s rampant corruption and insider self-dealing going on with the president’s up and down predictions of what’s going to happen tomorrow in the negotiations and in the markets. And I’m sure that that’s being investigated. We can’t prove it, but it seems like the corruption that we’re seeing in our government, maybe not the President, but people who are in the know and the markets, is having a priority over the actual negotiations to end the war. And that’s a crazy thing that our system has never seen before.”
0:45

“Somebody shorted the oil markets today by hundreds of millions of dollars exactly 20 minutes before Trump made his announcement that everything was going to be great. And if you see that once, it could be a coincidence. But that’s happened at least three times, if not more, since the war began. That’s a pattern.” “And what that suggests is that there’s rampant corruption and insider self-dealing going on with the president’s up and down predictions of what’s going to happen tomorrow in the negotiations and in the markets. And I’m sure that that’s being investigated. We can’t prove it, but it seems like the corruption that we’re seeing in our government, maybe not the President, but people who are in the know and the markets, is having a priority over the actual negotiations to end the war. And that’s a crazy thing that our system has never seen before.”

Josh Rogin

2,101,801 次观看 • 3 个月前

Megyn Kelly: “It’s stunning to me that the people who voted for the man who said over and over ‘No new wars,’ [and] ‘No war with Iran, no Middle East wars’— and specifically over and over said ‘Iran’ and also said ‘The Democrats are going to get us into a war with Iran’ — that was not a throwaway line. That was a massive part of his campaigning and his promising.” “That those people on a dime were like ‘Yes, we’re pro-war with Iran! Yes, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.’” “We all know that that’s a lie. It’s so obvious that’s a lie to get us into this conflict.”
1:30

Megyn Kelly: “It’s stunning to me that the people who voted for the man who said over and over ‘No new wars,’ [and] ‘No war with Iran, no Middle East wars’— and specifically over and over said ‘Iran’ and also said ‘The Democrats are going to get us into a war with Iran’ — that was not a throwaway line. That was a massive part of his campaigning and his promising.” “That those people on a dime were like ‘Yes, we’re pro-war with Iran! Yes, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.’” “We all know that that’s a lie. It’s so obvious that’s a lie to get us into this conflict.”

RedWave Press

24,446 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson just argued that IRAN SHOULD HAVE NUKES. Why? Because... Israel. Never mind that Shia Islam's End Times vision centers on a Middle East war helping to trigger the return of the so-called Hidden Imam or the Mahdi. The Iranian regime has repeatedly declared — only to fellow radical Islamists, of course — that attacks on Israel help prepare the world for the return of the Mahdi, aka the 12th Imam. (Not coincidentally, Iran's specific denomination is called Twelver Shi'a Islam.) Given that Tucker openly admits to communicating with Iran's top officials, he certainly must be aware of their religious extremism. Yet to Tucker, Iran acquiring nuclear weapons would be a "pragmatic" way to curtail Israel's "unrestrained power." Tucker hates the Jewish state so much that he WANTS Iran to have nuclear weapons — giving it the ability to hold the world hostage on a whole slew of issues, particularly on energy markets and global trade. Nukes would also grant Iran free reign to support terrorist activities around the world. Never mind the fact that Nukes would give an End Times-obsessed regime the ability... to, well, end the world as we know it. But to Tucker, all that is a small price to pay to give the ultimate weapon to the very people who want to "wipe Israel off the map."
1:33

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson just argued that IRAN SHOULD HAVE NUKES. Why? Because... Israel. Never mind that Shia Islam's End Times vision centers on a Middle East war helping to trigger the return of the so-called Hidden Imam or the Mahdi. The Iranian regime has repeatedly declared — only to fellow radical Islamists, of course — that attacks on Israel help prepare the world for the return of the Mahdi, aka the 12th Imam. (Not coincidentally, Iran's specific denomination is called Twelver Shi'a Islam.) Given that Tucker openly admits to communicating with Iran's top officials, he certainly must be aware of their religious extremism. Yet to Tucker, Iran acquiring nuclear weapons would be a "pragmatic" way to curtail Israel's "unrestrained power." Tucker hates the Jewish state so much that he WANTS Iran to have nuclear weapons — giving it the ability to hold the world hostage on a whole slew of issues, particularly on energy markets and global trade. Nukes would also grant Iran free reign to support terrorist activities around the world. Never mind the fact that Nukes would give an End Times-obsessed regime the ability... to, well, end the world as we know it. But to Tucker, all that is a small price to pay to give the ultimate weapon to the very people who want to "wipe Israel off the map."

Joel Mowbray

222,201 次观看 • 3 个月前