正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Tucker: “I never understood why 🇬🇧 fought World War 2?” 😕 Rees-Mogg: “It was good vs. evil…We did the right thing…” Tucker: “Has 🇬🇧 benefitted?” RM: “We defeated Hitler… We’d all be speaking German…” Tucker: “Who cares?” 🤔

541,929 次观看 • 15 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

William Hastings 的头像
William Hastings14 小时前

It is a sad reality that as nations decline, the moral men who built it get replaced by, well, whatever the fuck Tucker Carlson is.

RainCityWoman 的头像
RainCityWoman15 小时前

Jesus, just when you think Tucker might not be as bad as we think, he reminds us!

Friðgeir 的头像
Friðgeir14 小时前

Tucker is still on his quest to be a turbo twat about everything

Alexandra Halaby 的头像
Alexandra Halaby14 小时前

I mean...

Phil Grabar 的头像
Phil Grabar15 小时前

This is the same nitwit who thinks the supermarkets in Russia are so much better than in the USA,

Patrick Strother 的头像
Patrick Strother14 小时前

Is Tucker taking ketamine? He is off in looney tunes again.

The Voice of Reason 的头像
The Voice of Reason14 小时前

@ItWasACoup This can’t be real. Tucker can’t be this fucking evil, can he?

FFS‼️VoteBlue💙 的头像
FFS‼️VoteBlue💙15 小时前

See? Still a pendejo.

Klaatu 的头像
Klaatu15 小时前

Right, who cares if Nazis rule over half the western world. What a fucking moron.

OmeyDaHomey 的头像
OmeyDaHomey15 小时前

Imagine being so bat-shit crazy that ya make Rees-Mogg look normal.

Amy Coplan 的头像
Amy Coplan14 小时前

RM = the soul of reason. Has England benefitted? Well anyone Jewish, developmentally delayed, or LGBTQIA is not being gassed so there’s that ….

GosforthGal 的头像
GosforthGal15 小时前

So now we know Tucker would not defend America if it was under attack. Old Tucker here would be working for the invader. Fucking coward.

Cesar Alves 🇺🇸 🇵🇹 NJ 的头像
Cesar Alves 🇺🇸 🇵🇹 NJ15 小时前

Tucker is the reason why lead paint was banned.

Warner Scroggins 🇺🇸🕶️ 的头像
Warner Scroggins 🇺🇸🕶️14 小时前

The sooner white nationalism chokes on a corny dog and falls down every flight of stairs, the closer we'll all be to flying cars, walkable neighborhoods, and Starfleet

Susan 的头像
Susan15 小时前

Tucker thought Rees-Mogg would be a friendly far right conservative. Didn't work, did it?

Phil Grabar 的头像
Phil Grabar15 小时前

Just when I thought I couldn't dislike Carlson more...

KissMaBahooky 的头像
KissMaBahooky14 小时前

Jacob Rees-Mogg is slime. He's one of the sods that pushed Brexit. He's a condescending turd. His father wrote the book on Disaster Capitalism and he tried to enact it. He's as false as they come. Hell isn't hellish enough for this B'stard.

Ray Honeycutt 的头像
Ray Honeycutt15 小时前

Tucker is not a serious person. So does he really think the Nazi’s were the moral equivalent of the British ??

🇺🇦Calming Influence 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇳🇴 🇸🇪 的头像
🇺🇦Calming Influence 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇳🇴 🇸🇪14 小时前

It's possible that Great Britain fought in WWII because Hitler threatened to invade them, and then he started bombing the shit out of London. But that's just me thinking what I'd do.

Jeannie Rogers 🦋🦩🌺🕊️🌊🩵🌊 的头像
Jeannie Rogers 🦋🦩🌺🕊️🌊🩵🌊14 小时前

Wow Tucker is a jerk.

nope 的头像
nope14 小时前

It’s kind of neat that we literally don’t have to speculate about this. Every document and meeting minutes are in the Archives

Margaret Kimberley 的头像
Margaret Kimberley15 小时前

They were fighting for their colonies.

Nada Serf 的头像
Nada Serf14 小时前

Why does anyone still take Tucker seriously

Liquid Barb 🌻🟧💙🌈🦋 的头像
Liquid Barb 🌻🟧💙🌈🦋15 小时前

Uh…COMMUNISM???

Laura Resnick, Anti-Fascist 的头像
Laura Resnick, Anti-Fascist15 小时前

Tucker once again evinces how ignorant you have to be to vote Republican.

Suzy 的头像
Suzy14 小时前

Um…the British? Tucker has no loyalty to anything outside his own anus.

Judy Head 的头像
Judy Head14 小时前

The British are allies of Poland. Hitler attacked Poland. Considering the contributions of the Polish to George Washington during the American Revolution we should have entered WWII then too. Haym Salomon, greatly aided financially during the decisive battle of Yorktown.

Craig Beam 的头像
Craig Beam14 小时前

There are several thousand British Jews/homosexuals/disabled people who would have cared.

🇺🇸 Purple Blaze 🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦 🌻😷 🖖 的头像
🇺🇸 Purple Blaze 🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦 🌻😷 🖖14 小时前

Tucker is most likely being paid by Putin

Cernunnos 的头像
Cernunnos14 小时前

Some 280,000 - 290,000 Jewish United Kingdom citizens would never have been born had the nazis won. Approximately 2.9 million black citizens wouldn't have been born due to the nazis' intent to sterile "inferior races." And the list goes on. But Tuckered would probably approve.

Lynn Heilmann 的头像
Lynn Heilmann14 小时前

Looks like Tucker missed the part where the US was attacked on 12/7/41 by Japan and shortly thereafter Germany declared war on the US. Both of which led the US into WWII where we defeated Hitler/German and Japan as well.

Mike Berridge, 💙#FBPVT , #FBNHS 🌈 的头像
Mike Berridge, 💙#FBPVT , #FBNHS 🌈14 小时前

Yes, we aren't all speaking German

I’m bc 的头像
I’m bc15 小时前

And after the midterms Tucker will agree with Trump again just to be controversial and in the spotlight.

George Kaplan 的头像
George Kaplan15 小时前

A pair of right cunts. Nothing more, nothing less.

相关视频

I wholeheartedly agree with Tucker that policing who people are friends with is absurd. If Tucker wants to be friends with Erika Kirk, that’s his prerogative, and he shouldn’t face criticism for it. However, I do have some genuine questions for him. We all witnessed TPUSA’s inaction in condemning the Iran war. Are we to believe that this wasn’t intentional and sanctioned by leadership? Does he even know who Erika Kirk is — beyond Charlie? We all saw Erika’s employee, Blake Neff, publicly disavow Tucker. Blake stated that Tucker was never Charlie Kirk’s friend. No correction was ever publicly issued. So, is Erika Kirk okay with Blake disavowing Tucker as Charlie’s friend? Furthermore, would Erika Kirk continue to be friends with Tucker if he questioned the obviously flawed official narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death? I doubt it. Of course, we can all speculate about why that might be, but we’ve all seen how much Erika Kirk detests Candace Owens for doing just that. Charlie’s assassination is more pressing than JFK or 9/11. While Tucker has given ample airtime to both JFK and 9/11, he's given next to zero airtime to Charlie Kirk's murder beyond pussyfooting around it via guests. Tucker’s friend was murdered under suspicious circumstances, yet he has so far declined almost all comments on the matter, except for generalities. That’s not me demanding he talk about it. But it’s fair to ask what the hell is that? If Tucker wants to ignore the Charlie Kirk case out of his friendship with Erika, that’s fine. However, as a fan of Tucker's I would be remiss to not say that it’s similar to ignoring Epstein out of friendship with Donald Trump. Maybe Tucker needs more time, but it has almost been a year. The danger is waiting until so long where it becomes the same time frame as 9/11 or JFK where no one will ever be held to account. The assassination of Charlie Kirk matters, now. We should all be talking about it. Love Tucker, wouldn't he be writing this if I didn't, but damn.

Travis

28,922 次观看 • 1 个月前