Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Tucker is so good at this. Here, he completely deconstructs this British politician’s entire theory of just war in under ten minutes. It quickly becomes transparent that the scaffolding upholding his entire moral justification for the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is just thought-terminating clichés, not a deep understanding... of the tradition that begat ideas like “jus ad bellum” or “jus in bello” or something like that. And this is why Tucker’s so popular. Compare these interviews with the ones he regularly gets from corporate press journalists. The difference in intellect is clear, but it also becomes obvious that, although traditional media pretends to care about speaking “truth to power,” on matters of war and peace, they are puppets for the regime. He's quite literally the only one with the same access who is doing it right.show more

Liam McCollum

47,830 subscribers

191,568 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

23 Yorum

Fauci’s Hooded Beagle profil fotoğrafı

Fauci’s Hooded Beagle7 gün önce

Just a note, the bomb on Nagasaki killed the largest concentration of Catholics in Japan. Ground zero was right on top of the largest Catholic Cathedral in Asia.

Shallom, Nigga profil fotoğrafı

Shallom, Nigga7 gün önce

"Well, it was the classic Good vs Evil, wasn't it?" No, no it wasn't. It was the start of the propaganda war machine, funded by Zionists.

Chris Komatsu profil fotoğrafı

Chris Komatsu7 gün önce

@GreenspansWager What are you talking about? Jacob Rees-Mogg absolutely schools him here. And as a Japanese American, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified.

Kiran profil fotoğrafı

Kiran7 gün önce

Neocon: “there wouldn’t have been war if we appeared strong” Tucker: “but you attacked them”

Mel profil fotoğrafı

Mel7 gün önce

He also says nuclear weapons are good because both the US and Russia possessing them are what led to them not using them and causing total destruction. If that’s the case, every country should have nuclear weapons and there won’t be any more war

Tumbler Closet profil fotoğrafı

Tumbler Closet7 gün önce

Tucker only seems good if you’re a fool. He’s a goalpost shifting sophist.

Jason Derksen profil fotoğrafı

Jason Derksen7 gün önce

Tucker is so full of shit. Idk who believes anything he says.

bino profil fotoğrafı

bino7 gün önce

So good at taking down a dipshit Brit? Impressive, he found an idiot politician with a swanky accident. Do this with any American rep and they flounder as well.

Ty Mantooth profil fotoğrafı

Ty Mantooth7 gün önce

I’d just ask all these pro-Ukraine ppl if Russia backed a coup in Mexico and then said they were going to put their weapons and troops on the US border, would America be justified in starting a war with Mexico.

Mohsen, Esq. profil fotoğrafı

Mohsen, Esq.7 gün önce

🎯

Zemo profil fotoğrafı

Zemo7 gün önce

So good at playing dumb? It quickly becomes apparent Tucker isn’t aware of what Japan was up to during WW2…or I’m afraid ole Tucker has shuck his head into a concussion one too many times.

sofi k. profil fotoğrafı

sofi k.7 gün önce

Great point!

Vestigaliberal aka Joe Davis profil fotoğrafı

Vestigaliberal aka Joe Davis7 gün önce

Perhaps if you have suffered a grievous head wound it would appear this way

Ghost profil fotoğrafı

Ghost7 gün önce

So Iran is justified then in seeking and using nuclear weapons or is this special permission only for the UK.

Jason Derksen profil fotoğrafı

Jason Derksen7 gün önce

Idk libertarians are closet pacifists. Its nice to thing war can always be avoided

Mr. P M O S H profil fotoğrafı

Mr. P M O S H7 gün önce

@grok ¿Quién es el entrevistado?

The Come and Take it Flag profil fotoğrafı

The Come and Take it Flag7 gün önce

@grok how many civilian men, woman, and children were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor?

PatsStoolie profil fotoğrafı

PatsStoolie7 gün önce

It’s a bit of a one sided take, always accuse the victors of poor behavior

"Mr. Jakub" profil fotoğrafı

"Mr. Jakub"7 gün önce

The British guy is full of it. Britian actively helped Hitler gain power and take territories one by one - until they didn't 😂 and he calls it "good vs evil". It's a shame he didn't mention Zionist actions back then in Europe

Texikaner profil fotoğrafı

Texikaner7 gün önce

The most interesting thing about this interview for me is that my opinion of Rees-Mogg actually went up. I thought he came across as reasonable (for someone from his camp) and thoughtful, even if I disagree with his conclusions and POV.

the innawoods by mackson profil fotoğrafı

the innawoods by mackson7 gün önce

>them brown Niponees ray pered and slortered all their way through the pacific friendo. Ain’t no one objected to what happened. The Britty man is right on that.

plumber Tadd profil fotoğrafı

plumber Tadd7 gün önce

You sound just as nutty as Tucker. You must be president of his fan club. He’s not popular in a good way. Sorta like Hitler ya might say.

Michael Cust ⚛️🇺🇸🗽 profil fotoğrafı

Michael Cust ⚛️🇺🇸🗽7 gün önce

The entire conservative populist movement’s motto is, “Better Red Then Dead”. Tucker doesn’t disprove anything g except his own commitment to liberty.

Benzer Videolar

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT WAR War is terrible. But sometimes, the alternative is worse. I walk through the core question: when is war justified? Start with self-defense. If a nation—or a people—is under threat, do they have the right to fight back? Of course they do. I break down the moral and practical framework—what matters isn’t just war itself, but who is fighting, why they’re fighting, and what they’re trying to achieve. That’s the distinction too many people ignore. I also explain how these principles aren’t new. The idea of self-defense—even lethal force in defense of life—is rooted in biblical teaching, just as concepts like justice and punishment are. So how can anyone take the position that all war is unjustified, no matter the circumstances? This isn’t about glorifying war—it’s about understanding when it becomes necessary. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT WAR War is terrible. But sometimes, the alternative is worse. I walk through the core question: when is war justified? Start with self-defense. If a nation—or a people—is under threat, do they have the right to fight back? Of course they do. I break down the moral and practical framework—what matters isn’t just war itself, but who is fighting, why they’re fighting, and what they’re trying to achieve. That’s the distinction too many people ignore. I also explain how these principles aren’t new. The idea of self-defense—even lethal force in defense of life—is rooted in biblical teaching, just as concepts like justice and punishment are. So how can anyone take the position that all war is unjustified, no matter the circumstances? This isn’t about glorifying war—it’s about understanding when it becomes necessary. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

112,984 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Joe Rogan criticizes the corporate media's deceptive Trump bloodbath hoax and highlights the rise of independent media. "It's important to highlight how not just inaccurate but deceptive the media was in their depiction of what he said. They are taking this quote out of context and trying to say that there is going to be a civil war if he doesn't get elected, which is not what he's talking about at all. It's so disturbing that they think they can get away with it with all of the scrutiny with social media and all the independent journalists that exist now, which is one of the more interesting things about the demise of corporate media. The demise in trust in corporate media is at an all-time low, so this has led to a rise in true independent journalists. The real ones out there. The Matt Taibbi's and Glenn Greenwald's." Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi Glenn Greenwald

Joe Rogan criticizes the corporate media's deceptive Trump bloodbath hoax and highlights the rise of independent media. "It's important to highlight how not just inaccurate but deceptive the media was in their depiction of what he said. They are taking this quote out of context and trying to say that there is going to be a civil war if he doesn't get elected, which is not what he's talking about at all. It's so disturbing that they think they can get away with it with all of the scrutiny with social media and all the independent journalists that exist now, which is one of the more interesting things about the demise of corporate media. The demise in trust in corporate media is at an all-time low, so this has led to a rise in true independent journalists. The real ones out there. The Matt Taibbi's and Glenn Greenwald's." Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi Glenn Greenwald

KanekoaTheGreat

1,673,182 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Jesse Plemons is only in CIVIL WAR (2024) for a few minutes, yet he completely hijacks the movie. The tension in that scene is so unbearable that it feels like the entire film briefly stops breathing. One of the most memorable sequences of the year.

Jesse Plemons is only in CIVIL WAR (2024) for a few minutes, yet he completely hijacks the movie. The tension in that scene is so unbearable that it feels like the entire film briefly stops breathing. One of the most memorable sequences of the year.

cinesthetic.

49,005 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Farrukh

205,138 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

I think this single clip holds the key to understanding the entire Tucker Carlson arc. He's saying that going to war with Iran was his line in the sand. When that line was crossed he, much like a BPD art ho, made it his entire project to destroy Trump, or at the very least to destroy those who had used Trump to cross the line. He's saying that in a way that his retaliation against the line crossing gave him newfound purpose; a project for life. I think he's also admitting something deeper here--that this is how Tucker thinks and operates. He has a few big bright lines. If you cross one of them, he is going to spend every waking second figuring out how to retaliate. This sort of vindictive passion is surely the key to his success. It's Michael Jordan-esque--he uses fury at those who've insulted him or hurt him as fuel. At some level you gotta respect it. I think the deeper story is less about Iran and more that Tucker squarely blames Israel for taking his job away. Tucker loved that job. It's how he satisfied his massive, titanic ambition. Any compromise was worth it so he could hang on to that job. He's said as much in many of his recent interviews. Israel unfairly took that job away. And so Tucker made a deal with himself. I'm going to spend the rest of my life destroying the people who did that to me. And it gave him a project, a thing, in the absence of the job, that drove him to work day after day. And it is proof that if you go around messing with people's livelihoods, eventually you're going to mess with the wrong person. Similar also to Kanye. It's funny, however, that he's also admitting how impotent he, as a person in the media, was to stopping the war. He says this like it's a new realization; that it didn't matter how many threats he made, the war happened anyway. And while I do think he has, in a way, gotten his revenge on Israel in terms of public perception, I think he's also admitting that our new media environment with so called "independent voices" going against regime sponsored ones, is turning out to be pretty much the same as the old one. Like in that one, right wing voices have big, lucrative audiences, but very little power. Meanwhile, the Dems are outwardly and totally abandoning Israel, and that will have far more serious consequences than Tucker could dream.

I think this single clip holds the key to understanding the entire Tucker Carlson arc. He's saying that going to war with Iran was his line in the sand. When that line was crossed he, much like a BPD art ho, made it his entire project to destroy Trump, or at the very least to destroy those who had used Trump to cross the line. He's saying that in a way that his retaliation against the line crossing gave him newfound purpose; a project for life. I think he's also admitting something deeper here--that this is how Tucker thinks and operates. He has a few big bright lines. If you cross one of them, he is going to spend every waking second figuring out how to retaliate. This sort of vindictive passion is surely the key to his success. It's Michael Jordan-esque--he uses fury at those who've insulted him or hurt him as fuel. At some level you gotta respect it. I think the deeper story is less about Iran and more that Tucker squarely blames Israel for taking his job away. Tucker loved that job. It's how he satisfied his massive, titanic ambition. Any compromise was worth it so he could hang on to that job. He's said as much in many of his recent interviews. Israel unfairly took that job away. And so Tucker made a deal with himself. I'm going to spend the rest of my life destroying the people who did that to me. And it gave him a project, a thing, in the absence of the job, that drove him to work day after day. And it is proof that if you go around messing with people's livelihoods, eventually you're going to mess with the wrong person. Similar also to Kanye. It's funny, however, that he's also admitting how impotent he, as a person in the media, was to stopping the war. He says this like it's a new realization; that it didn't matter how many threats he made, the war happened anyway. And while I do think he has, in a way, gotten his revenge on Israel in terms of public perception, I think he's also admitting that our new media environment with so called "independent voices" going against regime sponsored ones, is turning out to be pretty much the same as the old one. Like in that one, right wing voices have big, lucrative audiences, but very little power. Meanwhile, the Dems are outwardly and totally abandoning Israel, and that will have far more serious consequences than Tucker could dream.

Disgraced Propagandist

27,602 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,168 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,367 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Be brutally honest: Do you agree with Megyn Kelly that President Trump should “please shut the fuck up” and that everyone is “sick and tired of this shit” from a man who cannot “behave like a normal person”? Yes or no? WATCH She said: "I don't know about you, but I am sick of this shit. I'm just, I'm, I'm sick of it. Can't he just behave like a normal human? "I mean, honestly, like the President, 3D chess. Shut up. Shut up about that. You don't threaten to wipe out an entire civilization. We're talking about civilians just casually in a social media post. "You know, like, I, I am the first to try to understand Trump and his strategy and to not freak out over his weird social media posts and language that is loose and incendiary. Truly, I've lived with it for 10 plus years. "I learned it the hard way when I was on the receiving end of it for nine months. And truly, I think that was a gift to me in many ways because it helped me really come to understand what he does with his social media. But this is completely irresponsible and disgusting. "This is wrong. It's wrong. He should not be doing it. I don't care that it's a negotiate. His negotiation tactic is, is to kill an entire country full of civilians, men, women and children. An American president, so that the Strait of Hormuz will be opened. "It's just wrong. It's not hard to say it, it's not hard to recognize it. I wish he would stop doing this. Like, he can't negotiate without doing this. What does that say about him? What does that say about the, the position that our country is in right now in these negotiations?"

Be brutally honest: Do you agree with Megyn Kelly that President Trump should “please shut the fuck up” and that everyone is “sick and tired of this shit” from a man who cannot “behave like a normal person”? Yes or no? WATCH She said: "I don't know about you, but I am sick of this shit. I'm just, I'm, I'm sick of it. Can't he just behave like a normal human? "I mean, honestly, like the President, 3D chess. Shut up. Shut up about that. You don't threaten to wipe out an entire civilization. We're talking about civilians just casually in a social media post. "You know, like, I, I am the first to try to understand Trump and his strategy and to not freak out over his weird social media posts and language that is loose and incendiary. Truly, I've lived with it for 10 plus years. "I learned it the hard way when I was on the receiving end of it for nine months. And truly, I think that was a gift to me in many ways because it helped me really come to understand what he does with his social media. But this is completely irresponsible and disgusting. "This is wrong. It's wrong. He should not be doing it. I don't care that it's a negotiate. His negotiation tactic is, is to kill an entire country full of civilians, men, women and children. An American president, so that the Strait of Hormuz will be opened. "It's just wrong. It's not hard to say it, it's not hard to recognize it. I wish he would stop doing this. Like, he can't negotiate without doing this. What does that say about him? What does that say about the, the position that our country is in right now in these negotiations?"

Simon Ateba

12,588 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"And the worst thing about it is American credibility, not just in dealing with the Iranian regime, but to the entire world—basically we show that Trump is incompetent, he is capricious, he's completely erratic, and he's basically psychotic. He … has no conception of reality."

"And the worst thing about it is American credibility, not just in dealing with the Iranian regime, but to the entire world—basically we show that Trump is incompetent, he is capricious, he's completely erratic, and he's basically psychotic. He … has no conception of reality."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

52,739 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

HE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE TO SAY MUCH… THE LOOK SAID EVERYTHING. What makes this scene so interesting is how quickly attraction becomes the entire conversation. One character openly acknowledges what he’s feeling, while the other has to sit there and process just how direct that attention is. And that’s where the scene becomes more than just a romantic moment. There’s something almost uncomfortable about watching someone realize they’re being looked at in a completely different way. The line “Because I like it” is so simple, but it changes the energy of the entire exchange. That’s the kind of confidence that either makes a moment incredibly attractive… or incredibly awkward. The interesting question is: when does attraction stop feeling flattering and start feeling like pressure? Because this scene sits right on that line.

HE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE TO SAY MUCH… THE LOOK SAID EVERYTHING. What makes this scene so interesting is how quickly attraction becomes the entire conversation. One character openly acknowledges what he’s feeling, while the other has to sit there and process just how direct that attention is. And that’s where the scene becomes more than just a romantic moment. There’s something almost uncomfortable about watching someone realize they’re being looked at in a completely different way. The line “Because I like it” is so simple, but it changes the energy of the entire exchange. That’s the kind of confidence that either makes a moment incredibly attractive… or incredibly awkward. The interesting question is: when does attraction stop feeling flattering and start feeling like pressure? Because this scene sits right on that line.

Commentary - MovieCentral⁠

153,842 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

Neo

105,218 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

‼️International Law vs World War III (w/ Dr. Annelle Rodriguez Sheline)‼️ "They're talking about this as like a religious war and the return of the Messiah. And the number of complaints that are coming through these hotlines for for US troops that are like: 'I signed up to defend the Constitution and it is very contrary to the First Amendment of the Constitution to say that this is a religious war or that the United States is fighting on behalf of Christendom or something.'"

‼️International Law vs World War III (w/ Dr. Annelle Rodriguez Sheline)‼️ "They're talking about this as like a religious war and the return of the Messiah. And the number of complaints that are coming through these hotlines for for US troops that are like: 'I signed up to defend the Constitution and it is very contrary to the First Amendment of the Constitution to say that this is a religious war or that the United States is fighting on behalf of Christendom or something.'"

Briahna Joy Gray

45,918 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Joe Rogan Calls Out Bill Gates Corruption - Says Bill Gates is not a philanthropist - He profits off lies - Made a career out of telling lies - “F**king wild” how he profited off the covid vaccines “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited millions of dollars on the vaccines. And then once he dumped the stock, he completely changed his narrative and he started talking about how ineffective the vaccines were and about how the virus wasn't as bad as we thought it was. Like this is f**king wild because this is the same guy that through the entire pandemic was talking about how great these vaccines are and these vaccines are so effective and they stop the virus and all that was a lie and he profited off those lies. Everyone wants to pretend that he's just like this amazing philanthropist. No. He made a lot of money. This is motivated by money and his entire career he's been motivated by money. He's a businessman and in that time his business was the business of telling people things that he's not educated in. Right, He's not a scientist. He's not a medical doctor. This is crazy how transparent it is. You're not even hiding it.”

Joe Rogan Calls Out Bill Gates Corruption - Says Bill Gates is not a philanthropist - He profits off lies - Made a career out of telling lies - “Fking wild” how he profited off the covid vaccines “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited millions of dollars on the vaccines. And then once he dumped the stock, he completely changed his narrative and he started talking about how ineffective the vaccines were and about how the virus wasn't as bad as we thought it was. Like this is fking wild because this is the same guy that through the entire pandemic was talking about how great these vaccines are and these vaccines are so effective and they stop the virus and all that was a lie and he profited off those lies. Everyone wants to pretend that he's just like this amazing philanthropist. No. He made a lot of money. This is motivated by money and his entire career he's been motivated by money. He's a businessman and in that time his business was the business of telling people things that he's not educated in. Right, He's not a scientist. He's not a medical doctor. This is crazy how transparent it is. You're not even hiding it.”

Wall Street Apes

37,831 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

JUST IN: Turkish President Erdogan: It is clear and obvious that the war in the Middle East, especially in Gaza, is a genocide. It is impossible for us to turn a blind eye to this genocide. The perpetrator of this genocide is Netanyahu, it is Israel.

JUST IN: Turkish President Erdogan: It is clear and obvious that the war in the Middle East, especially in Gaza, is a genocide. It is impossible for us to turn a blind eye to this genocide. The perpetrator of this genocide is Netanyahu, it is Israel.

Sulaiman Ahmed

249,212 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Russian Z-propagandist Solovyev claimed that this war is a sacred war of the Russian people: "This is not a war of our generation, this is not something thought up by old men, this is not somewhere up there with the Kremlin sages - no. It is not the State Duma, not the Senate. It is a sacred war of the Russian people of the most diverse nationalities and faiths." He also added that the sabotage in Leipzig was a provocation and that if Russia wanted to, it would "wipe its enemies off the face of the earth."

Russian Z-propagandist Solovyev claimed that this war is a sacred war of the Russian people: "This is not a war of our generation, this is not something thought up by old men, this is not somewhere up there with the Kremlin sages - no. It is not the State Duma, not the Senate. It is a sacred war of the Russian people of the most diverse nationalities and faiths." He also added that the sabotage in Leipzig was a provocation and that if Russia wanted to, it would "wipe its enemies off the face of the earth."

Anton Gerashchenko

62,105 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‘The US🇺🇸 is at WAR against Russia🇷🇺 through Ukraine. If it continues, it will end in a nuclear exchange that KILLS EVERYONE.’ —Tucker Carlson on Going Underground ‘The CIA is running the war. The US intelligence services are running the war out of Ukraine against Russia. Trump said that he would bring that to a close within a day, I think he said that to me repeatedly in private and in public. And instead, he's accelerated it, The United States is at war with Russia, and the only kind of conceivable end stage if this continues is a nuclear exchange in which everyone is killed. So this is again a kind of lunacy. Why is he doing it? Well, I don't think Trump is making this decision independently. From what I know, because I've talked to him about it an awful lot, he likes Putin, respects Putin. It's not personal or anything like that. It's a product of what all of this is caused by, and that's the fact that the US president is not really in control of the US government. He's an employee too. He doesn't have sovereignty. He is a slave to more powerful forces. And in this specific instance, the war against Russia has now become of a piece with the war against Iran. You had Ukrainian attacks on Iranian assets, so the wars have merged into a global war. It does not serve the United States. It risks the existence of the United States. It's something that Trump, I think, very sincerely said he opposed, and now he is leading it. And so again, we're getting to a structural problem, which is that the United States does not have sovereignty. The elected leaders of the United States don't make the most important decisions.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post 👇 Tucker Carlson

‘The US🇺🇸 is at WAR against Russia🇷🇺 through Ukraine. If it continues, it will end in a nuclear exchange that KILLS EVERYONE.’ —Tucker Carlson on Going Underground ‘The CIA is running the war. The US intelligence services are running the war out of Ukraine against Russia. Trump said that he would bring that to a close within a day, I think he said that to me repeatedly in private and in public. And instead, he's accelerated it, The United States is at war with Russia, and the only kind of conceivable end stage if this continues is a nuclear exchange in which everyone is killed. So this is again a kind of lunacy. Why is he doing it? Well, I don't think Trump is making this decision independently. From what I know, because I've talked to him about it an awful lot, he likes Putin, respects Putin. It's not personal or anything like that. It's a product of what all of this is caused by, and that's the fact that the US president is not really in control of the US government. He's an employee too. He doesn't have sovereignty. He is a slave to more powerful forces. And in this specific instance, the war against Russia has now become of a piece with the war against Iran. You had Ukrainian attacks on Iranian assets, so the wars have merged into a global war. It does not serve the United States. It risks the existence of the United States. It's something that Trump, I think, very sincerely said he opposed, and now he is leading it. And so again, we're getting to a structural problem, which is that the United States does not have sovereignty. The elected leaders of the United States don't make the most important decisions.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post 👇 Tucker Carlson

Going Underground

47,063 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Professor at Columbia University Sachs - on the fact that the Third World War has already begun: I believe the probability of reaching the Third World War is quite high. In a way, we may already be in its early phase. No war has been officially declared, but we have a war in the Western Hemisphere, a war in Ukraine, a war around Iran and in the Middle East. We see conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan — and all of this is somehow connected. Intelligence services are also part of this complex system. That is why this is quite an extensive phenomenon. The United States is at the center of all these processes and, in my opinion, the main cause of these wars. Essentially, these are wars for American hegemony — an attempt to prove not only that the USA is the number one country, but also, according to Trump's understanding, the only power that should determine everything.

Professor at Columbia University Sachs - on the fact that the Third World War has already begun: I believe the probability of reaching the Third World War is quite high. In a way, we may already be in its early phase. No war has been officially declared, but we have a war in the Western Hemisphere, a war in Ukraine, a war around Iran and in the Middle East. We see conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan — and all of this is somehow connected. Intelligence services are also part of this complex system. That is why this is quite an extensive phenomenon. The United States is at the center of all these processes and, in my opinion, the main cause of these wars. Essentially, these are wars for American hegemony — an attempt to prove not only that the USA is the number one country, but also, according to Trump's understanding, the only power that should determine everything.

Sprinter Press

12,783 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce