Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Tucker likes to have friendly conversations with bad people. When he realizes that he’s talking to Iranian intelligence officials that we already collect on, he pretends to be a victim of “spying.” He’s an idiot, and he thinks you’re an idiot too. You always need a warrant to “wire... tap” any American citizen. Full stop. But if you’re communicating with a criminal and that criminal’s phone is tapped (because a judge authorized it), then your conversation is now part of that investigation. If the police also want to tap your phone, they would need a warrant. FISA is no different. Tucker knows all this but his favorite grift is to play the victim. I’m surprised he hasn’t blamed the Jews yet. Give it time.show more

Dan Crenshaw

1,272,531 subscribers

402,101 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My thoughts on Tucker and Iran: And before anyone grabs their pitchforks … no, I’m not saying he’s secretly working for Iran. Relax. But the story he’s telling raises some questions. First, Tucker says the government is spying on him and reading his text messages. Could that happen? Sure. Governments spy on people all the time. But he didn’t show any evidence that it’s actually happening. Now, maybe he’s right. Maybe he’s wrong. Right now we don’t know, because we’ve been given exactly zero receipts. Then Tucker says the reason the government spies on people is so they can leak private information to the media and humiliate and terrify them. Again … maybe. But again … zero evidence. And when someone makes a very dramatic claim with no evidence, the vagueness starts doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Because once you plant the seed—“the government might be spying on you”—people who already distrust the government will happily let their imagination sprint the rest of the way to the finish line. And maybe that’s the point. Then Tucker says: Because he’s a free American, he can talk to whoever he wants, whenever he wants. And technically, yes, he can talk to people. But should he talk to whoever he wants? Tucker hasn’t just been chatting with random people over coffee. He’s been visiting the White House and meeting privately with Donald Trump. By his own admission, he’s been trying to persuade Trump not to launch military action against Iran. That’s not illegal. That’s not scandalous. That’s just influence and access. But … Most Americans don’t have private meetings with the president. And when someone does have that kind of access, it’s not crazy for governments to be a little curious about where else that person is having conversations. Especially if that same person is also meeting with officials from a country that the United States might be preparing to attack. Again, I’m not saying Tucker shared anything. But you don’t have to accuse someone of espionage to recognize when a situation might make intelligence agencies raise an eyebrow. If you’re regularly meeting with the president … And you’re also talking with officials from a hostile government … You’ve placed yourself in a situation where scrutiny becomes pretty predictable. Not because you’re guilty. But because the optics are messy.

My thoughts on Tucker and Iran: And before anyone grabs their pitchforks … no, I’m not saying he’s secretly working for Iran. Relax. But the story he’s telling raises some questions. First, Tucker says the government is spying on him and reading his text messages. Could that happen? Sure. Governments spy on people all the time. But he didn’t show any evidence that it’s actually happening. Now, maybe he’s right. Maybe he’s wrong. Right now we don’t know, because we’ve been given exactly zero receipts. Then Tucker says the reason the government spies on people is so they can leak private information to the media and humiliate and terrify them. Again … maybe. But again … zero evidence. And when someone makes a very dramatic claim with no evidence, the vagueness starts doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Because once you plant the seed—“the government might be spying on you”—people who already distrust the government will happily let their imagination sprint the rest of the way to the finish line. And maybe that’s the point. Then Tucker says: Because he’s a free American, he can talk to whoever he wants, whenever he wants. And technically, yes, he can talk to people. But should he talk to whoever he wants? Tucker hasn’t just been chatting with random people over coffee. He’s been visiting the White House and meeting privately with Donald Trump. By his own admission, he’s been trying to persuade Trump not to launch military action against Iran. That’s not illegal. That’s not scandalous. That’s just influence and access. But … Most Americans don’t have private meetings with the president. And when someone does have that kind of access, it’s not crazy for governments to be a little curious about where else that person is having conversations. Especially if that same person is also meeting with officials from a country that the United States might be preparing to attack. Again, I’m not saying Tucker shared anything. But you don’t have to accuse someone of espionage to recognize when a situation might make intelligence agencies raise an eyebrow. If you’re regularly meeting with the president … And you’re also talking with officials from a hostile government … You’ve placed yourself in a situation where scrutiny becomes pretty predictable. Not because you’re guilty. But because the optics are messy.

Bren

60,654 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Here’s a crash course on the FISA 702 warrant debate. I’m not going to mince words - the Congressmen demanding a warrant to simply search a database full of foreign terrorist and foreign intelligence conversations are refusing to learn the basic facts. Let’s do a thought exercise: if you get a warrant to tap a criminal’s phone, do you think police just ignore the people he speaks to? No of course not. They hear it. And if the police want to hear more about the person on the other side of the phone call, they get a new warrant for it. THAT IS ALSO HOW FISA WORKS. Stupidity is a choice. These Members of Congress refusing to listen to the facts and President Trump aren’t “guardians of civil liberty.” They are dishonest fools looking for affirmation from social media. The worst part? They’ve been told the facts in classified sessions, and THEY DO NOT CARE. They couldn’t care less if an attack kills Americans and it could have been prevented. They know they won’t get blamed. They know the internet will make up some other absurd narrative and they’ll jump on board. It’s disgraceful.

Here’s a crash course on the FISA 702 warrant debate. I’m not going to mince words - the Congressmen demanding a warrant to simply search a database full of foreign terrorist and foreign intelligence conversations are refusing to learn the basic facts. Let’s do a thought exercise: if you get a warrant to tap a criminal’s phone, do you think police just ignore the people he speaks to? No of course not. They hear it. And if the police want to hear more about the person on the other side of the phone call, they get a new warrant for it. THAT IS ALSO HOW FISA WORKS. Stupidity is a choice. These Members of Congress refusing to listen to the facts and President Trump aren’t “guardians of civil liberty.” They are dishonest fools looking for affirmation from social media. The worst part? They’ve been told the facts in classified sessions, and THEY DO NOT CARE. They couldn’t care less if an attack kills Americans and it could have been prevented. They know they won’t get blamed. They know the internet will make up some other absurd narrative and they’ll jump on board. It’s disgraceful.

Dan Crenshaw

42,998 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Tucker Carlson knows that the "attacks" on him aren't driven by Israel. He knows that because he knows me. And he knows I'm shining a light on his hate because his Dad was a mentor to me. Tucker pretends that I'm just some "proxy," but he knows his Dad is my motivation, that I'm doing this precisely because his own father would agree with me. Tucker's views are an anathema to everything Dick Carlson believed. Simply put, Tucker can't stand to be reminded that he is disgracing his own father's legacy. See the message I sent Tucker on January 17, giving him the opportunity to talk. He read it, but chose not to reply. Tucker and I were never close, but (at least until recently) he'd stop if he saw me to say hello, or respond to my texts. Tucker has no intent to do anything besides hammering Jews and driving a wedge between them and Christians. But he doesn't want to be reminded that his Dad would abhor his repulsive conduct. That's why Tucker won't say my name. He can't handle thinking how much he is desecrating his own father's legacy. Yet that's exactly what he's doing as he chases the groyper throne.

Tucker Carlson knows that the "attacks" on him aren't driven by Israel. He knows that because he knows me. And he knows I'm shining a light on his hate because his Dad was a mentor to me. Tucker pretends that I'm just some "proxy," but he knows his Dad is my motivation, that I'm doing this precisely because his own father would agree with me. Tucker's views are an anathema to everything Dick Carlson believed. Simply put, Tucker can't stand to be reminded that he is disgracing his own father's legacy. See the message I sent Tucker on January 17, giving him the opportunity to talk. He read it, but chose not to reply. Tucker and I were never close, but (at least until recently) he'd stop if he saw me to say hello, or respond to my texts. Tucker has no intent to do anything besides hammering Jews and driving a wedge between them and Christians. But he doesn't want to be reminded that his Dad would abhor his repulsive conduct. That's why Tucker won't say my name. He can't handle thinking how much he is desecrating his own father's legacy. Yet that's exactly what he's doing as he chases the groyper throne.

Joel Mowbray

1,946,418 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Asked Daniel Gafford for his impressions of Masai Ujiri & the decisions he’s made over the last month. “It is a business. I’m not necessarily surprised when it comes to some of the things that he’s done with the organization because I’m pretty sure he already had that in his back pocket when he got hired. I’m just sitting back & watching from afar…I’ve yet to get the chance to sit down & talk with him, but he made sure he called me & we had a good conversation on the phone.”

Asked Daniel Gafford for his impressions of Masai Ujiri & the decisions he’s made over the last month. “It is a business. I’m not necessarily surprised when it comes to some of the things that he’s done with the organization because I’m pretty sure he already had that in his back pocket when he got hired. I’m just sitting back & watching from afar…I’ve yet to get the chance to sit down & talk with him, but he made sure he called me & we had a good conversation on the phone.”

Mike Curtis

75,969 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents tried to tell a building manager that a locked apartment building is not private property, in Minneapolis. In the video, the building manager asks a very simple question: Do you have a judicial warrant? The agent’s response? “This is not private property.” Which is a wild thing to say while standing outside a locked residential building you’re trying to get into. He keeps insisting she’s wrong. She doesn’t budge. She finally says, “You aren’t going to get in. I’m not opening the door without a warrant.” Another agent then asks if she can tell him whether the person on his phone is inside. She says, “No.” He then responds, “Can’t tell me that either? Want to keep your criminals in your building?” And she shuts that down by saying, “I want to keep my residents safe.” Which is the exact opposite of what ICE was doing. Because trying to pressure your way into private property, without a judicial warrant, is fishing. It’s hoping someone doesn’t know their rights. And do you know what they hope you don’t realize? If this person was actually some dangerous “worst of the worst” criminal, they love talking about, getting a judge to sign a warrant would be the easiest part of their day. Instead, they show up with no warrant, no legal authority to enter, and try to lie their way inside. Because ICE agents are gambling on the idea that regular people will be too scared to say no. And that’s why they continue to use threats and violence, while claiming that anyone with a pending immigration case is a criminal. This manager saw through that. Which is exactly why the Constitution only works when someone is willing to demand it be upheld. No warrant. No entry.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents tried to tell a building manager that a locked apartment building is not private property, in Minneapolis. In the video, the building manager asks a very simple question: Do you have a judicial warrant? The agent’s response? “This is not private property.” Which is a wild thing to say while standing outside a locked residential building you’re trying to get into. He keeps insisting she’s wrong. She doesn’t budge. She finally says, “You aren’t going to get in. I’m not opening the door without a warrant.” Another agent then asks if she can tell him whether the person on his phone is inside. She says, “No.” He then responds, “Can’t tell me that either? Want to keep your criminals in your building?” And she shuts that down by saying, “I want to keep my residents safe.” Which is the exact opposite of what ICE was doing. Because trying to pressure your way into private property, without a judicial warrant, is fishing. It’s hoping someone doesn’t know their rights. And do you know what they hope you don’t realize? If this person was actually some dangerous “worst of the worst” criminal, they love talking about, getting a judge to sign a warrant would be the easiest part of their day. Instead, they show up with no warrant, no legal authority to enter, and try to lie their way inside. Because ICE agents are gambling on the idea that regular people will be too scared to say no. And that’s why they continue to use threats and violence, while claiming that anyone with a pending immigration case is a criminal. This manager saw through that. Which is exactly why the Constitution only works when someone is willing to demand it be upheld. No warrant. No entry.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,320,199 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Tucker Carlson’s latest trick is selective amnesia He pretends he’s never heard of people he’s literally hosted — not only because he hopes you’ll conclude that they’re irrelevant, but because he assumes you’re too stupid to catch on Unfortunately for him we have the receipts

Tucker Carlson’s latest trick is selective amnesia He pretends he’s never heard of people he’s literally hosted — not only because he hopes you’ll conclude that they’re irrelevant, but because he assumes you’re too stupid to catch on Unfortunately for him we have the receipts

Arynne Wexler

325,663 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Jake Lang just admitted to the crime he’s being charged with and then asked people to donate to his give send go because he knows all that money he raised on his last grift is gonna run out quick when he has to pay any decent lawyer willing to defend him. He’s such a fucking grifter he just incriminated himself to play victim for handouts. The prosecutor is gonna fuckin love this 🤣🤣🤣

Jake Lang just admitted to the crime he’s being charged with and then asked people to donate to his give send go because he knows all that money he raised on his last grift is gonna run out quick when he has to pay any decent lawyer willing to defend him. He’s such a fucking grifter he just incriminated himself to play victim for handouts. The prosecutor is gonna fuckin love this 🤣🤣🤣

The Misfit Patriot

24,795 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Charlie Kirk: “The regime hates an informed population. They despise when you know history.” Then he pointed to Tucker: “You’re the one who radicalized me more than anybody else… Tucker would go to his show and keep asking questions.” Then he explained: “Critics always attack Tucker as ‘he’s always asking questions’ but isn’t that what the pursuit of truth is all about?” And Tucker answered: “Free inquiry is the basis of a free society” and “anyone telling you not to ask questions is a threat to you.” This is the whole war: History vs regime. Questions vs control.

Charlie Kirk: “The regime hates an informed population. They despise when you know history.” Then he pointed to Tucker: “You’re the one who radicalized me more than anybody else… Tucker would go to his show and keep asking questions.” Then he explained: “Critics always attack Tucker as ‘he’s always asking questions’ but isn’t that what the pursuit of truth is all about?” And Tucker answered: “Free inquiry is the basis of a free society” and “anyone telling you not to ask questions is a threat to you.” This is the whole war: History vs regime. Questions vs control.

Phantom Pain

77,088 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

What would you have done if you were in her shoes?👀🤔 “Imagine your phone went bad and to fix your phone is over 450k and then you told the person you were dating because your phone is your only source of income and he was like he does not have any money at the moment that he will give you the money next two weeks and you told him that you cannot be without your phone for two weeks that even if he has half of the money he can give you so you can be able to rally round and get the money because you have a lot of pending deals to deliver on the phone,and he insisted he doesn’t have anything to give you not even 10k. So you were able to rally round and repair your phone then during this period your partner who’s suppose to get married to you travelled to Abuja for a work then after you were able to fix your phone he came back and call you that you should come over then when you get his place, you noticed that he came back with two suitcase and because he travelled with only one. When you opened the new suitcase because he was trying to sort out the things that he bought and you’re seeing designer things and you’re just hailing him that the things he bought are looking fine o and he casually said that the purse you’re holding his 1.5million so when you did your calculations you noticed that the things he bought was more than 7million naira, and this was the same person you asked for 450k or even half of the money so that you can get your phone repaired and he said he doesn’t have any money. You got offended but you locked up then after like two days you asked him about the money that you borrowed money and you need to pay the people back and he started with his normal tales that he has no money and you said that okay no problem then you went back to your house. During the weekend normally you go to your babes house so when you got to his place he told you there was no soup or stew that you need to cook so you gave him a list and there is a drawer beside you then you opened it,you saw bundle of cash in the drawer and with a rough estimate you were about to count his up to 400k and when you told him about the amount for the food he didn’t even price it, he just gave you the money. After cooking for him th en you reminded him about the money you used to repair your phone that even if it is 190k but he told her to hold on that he will give you next week. The next week you called your partner again and he said you should wait till Friday. On Wednesday evening, he called you that his friend is hosting a party and he wants you to go with him and sent you 75 k to get something to wear. At the party your partner was spraying money and getting hyped. He then gave you one bundle that you should spray the celebrant which you did,in your head he was going to give you the money to pay people that you’re owing. Friday comes and he didn’t say anything about it. At that point you were already p!ssed and when he called you raised your voice at him that you don’t mean anything to him then he said you’re disrespectful person and he ended the call. So base on you were angry you also didn’t call and hustle for the money then after like 5 days in your head you already broke up with the guy. After like 5 days your partner called you and asked where are you? that he’s coming to your house and you told him that he should not come to your house, he opened the message but didn’t respond then he came knocking at your door after a while you opened for him and he was acting like everything is okay asking how are you then you tried explaining he just kept apologizing. So now you’re confuse, you’re contemplating ‘are you going to forgive a man that treated you like you mean nothing to him or just understood that period was rough for him —- Lady shares a story asking for advice😕🤔

Sensitive content

What would you have done if you were in her shoes?👀🤔 “Imagine your phone went bad and to fix your phone is over 450k and then you told the person you were dating because your phone is your only source of income and he was like he does not have any money at the moment that he will give you the money next two weeks and you told him that you cannot be without your phone for two weeks that even if he has half of the money he can give you so you can be able to rally round and get the money because you have a lot of pending deals to deliver on the phone,and he insisted he doesn’t have anything to give you not even 10k. So you were able to rally round and repair your phone then during this period your partner who’s suppose to get married to you travelled to Abuja for a work then after you were able to fix your phone he came back and call you that you should come over then when you get his place, you noticed that he came back with two suitcase and because he travelled with only one. When you opened the new suitcase because he was trying to sort out the things that he bought and you’re seeing designer things and you’re just hailing him that the things he bought are looking fine o and he casually said that the purse you’re holding his 1.5million so when you did your calculations you noticed that the things he bought was more than 7million naira, and this was the same person you asked for 450k or even half of the money so that you can get your phone repaired and he said he doesn’t have any money. You got offended but you locked up then after like two days you asked him about the money that you borrowed money and you need to pay the people back and he started with his normal tales that he has no money and you said that okay no problem then you went back to your house. During the weekend normally you go to your babes house so when you got to his place he told you there was no soup or stew that you need to cook so you gave him a list and there is a drawer beside you then you opened it,you saw bundle of cash in the drawer and with a rough estimate you were about to count his up to 400k and when you told him about the amount for the food he didn’t even price it, he just gave you the money. After cooking for him th en you reminded him about the money you used to repair your phone that even if it is 190k but he told her to hold on that he will give you next week. The next week you called your partner again and he said you should wait till Friday. On Wednesday evening, he called you that his friend is hosting a party and he wants you to go with him and sent you 75 k to get something to wear. At the party your partner was spraying money and getting hyped. He then gave you one bundle that you should spray the celebrant which you did,in your head he was going to give you the money to pay people that you’re owing. Friday comes and he didn’t say anything about it. At that point you were already p!ssed and when he called you raised your voice at him that you don’t mean anything to him then he said you’re disrespectful person and he ended the call. So base on you were angry you also didn’t call and hustle for the money then after like 5 days in your head you already broke up with the guy. After like 5 days your partner called you and asked where are you? that he’s coming to your house and you told him that he should not come to your house, he opened the message but didn’t respond then he came knocking at your door after a while you opened for him and he was acting like everything is okay asking how are you then you tried explaining he just kept apologizing. So now you’re confuse, you’re contemplating ‘are you going to forgive a man that treated you like you mean nothing to him or just understood that period was rough for him —- Lady shares a story asking for advice😕🤔

MEDIA BLOG

44,095 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

We shouldn’t be spying on Americans without a warrant. It’s that simple. FISA was meant for foreign intelligence, not sweeping up your calls and texts just because you talked to someone who talked to someone overseas. I’m putting forth an amendment that would make the government obtain a warrant if it wants to look at Americans and use it to stop terrorism. Maria Bartiromo

We shouldn’t be spying on Americans without a warrant. It’s that simple. FISA was meant for foreign intelligence, not sweeping up your calls and texts just because you talked to someone who talked to someone overseas. I’m putting forth an amendment that would make the government obtain a warrant if it wants to look at Americans and use it to stop terrorism. Maria Bartiromo

Rand Paul

111,098 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

El-Sayed: Vance said he wanted to have a conversation about me with his papaw, a person that I understand has long since passed. May he rest in peace. But why would you invoke your long-since-passed grandfather to make an argument about me if you’re not trying to take us back to a time when people like me were less than normal? But then that raises the question about who else might not be normal in that kind of an America. Who else might not be included in the broad spectrum of who can be an American? I believe in an America where any of us—me, his wife, any of us with different-colored skin, or who pray different ways—can be just as American as J.D. and his papaw. But he’s not making that argument. He likes to dog-whistle about these things, but when you actually call him out on it, he acts like he would never bring anything like that into our political conversation despite he and his boss doing that every single day.

El-Sayed: Vance said he wanted to have a conversation about me with his papaw, a person that I understand has long since passed. May he rest in peace. But why would you invoke your long-since-passed grandfather to make an argument about me if you’re not trying to take us back to a time when people like me were less than normal? But then that raises the question about who else might not be normal in that kind of an America. Who else might not be included in the broad spectrum of who can be an American? I believe in an America where any of us—me, his wife, any of us with different-colored skin, or who pray different ways—can be just as American as J.D. and his papaw. But he’s not making that argument. He likes to dog-whistle about these things, but when you actually call him out on it, he acts like he would never bring anything like that into our political conversation despite he and his boss doing that every single day.

Acyn

284,407 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Putin said that plans are in place for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea to be destroyed by Ukraine. He says this because it terrifies him because it will cripple the last of Russian gas exports. He says this because he thinks that people give a fuck if we collapse the Russian economy. He also stated nuclear components are also being considered for use against Russia. He says this because he’s a fucking paranoid idiot and he’s also trying to use the nuclear narrative to scare the world about a nuclear apocalypse. No one talks about Nukes other than Russia because the treat of them is the only power they have left. The reason why he’s giving these speeches is because Ukraine has him on his fucking knees and he’s scrambling to not only stop losing the war which he has been doing for the past 4 years, but to also save Russia and his life, he knows when he loses this war his head in on a chopping block. Fuck Putin And Fuck Russia.

Putin said that plans are in place for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea to be destroyed by Ukraine. He says this because it terrifies him because it will cripple the last of Russian gas exports. He says this because he thinks that people give a fuck if we collapse the Russian economy. He also stated nuclear components are also being considered for use against Russia. He says this because he’s a fucking paranoid idiot and he’s also trying to use the nuclear narrative to scare the world about a nuclear apocalypse. No one talks about Nukes other than Russia because the treat of them is the only power they have left. The reason why he’s giving these speeches is because Ukraine has him on his fucking knees and he’s scrambling to not only stop losing the war which he has been doing for the past 4 years, but to also save Russia and his life, he knows when he loses this war his head in on a chopping block. Fuck Putin And Fuck Russia.

Bricktop_NAFO

477,212 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Sheldon Rankins on Will Anderson Jr.: “He’s getting to that point where he realizes if he wants to shut practice down, he can shut it down. If he don’t want them to get a play off, they won’t get a play off. He don’t want them to get a pass off, they won’t get a pass off. He want a TFL every play, he can go do it. He’s starting to get to that point where he finally realizes like ‘the game is in the palms of my hands’. He’s starting to realize the power that he has in his hands, feet, helmet, all the above & he’s letting it be known everyday.”

Sheldon Rankins on Will Anderson Jr.: “He’s getting to that point where he realizes if he wants to shut practice down, he can shut it down. If he don’t want them to get a play off, they won’t get a play off. He don’t want them to get a pass off, they won’t get a pass off. He want a TFL every play, he can go do it. He’s starting to get to that point where he finally realizes like ‘the game is in the palms of my hands’. He’s starting to realize the power that he has in his hands, feet, helmet, all the above & he’s letting it be known everyday.”

Houston Stressans

839,438 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I think the presenter is on to something big, but where I disagree with her is that she accuses African leaders and gives a subtle pass to African citizens. It is not true that African citizens were oblivious to what Trump or Epstein are. They knew, but they simply did not have the ability to think critically that when Trump talks about LGBT issues, it is not necessarily that he does not support them, but that he understood there is a group of foolish people out there who would buy into that rhetoric without interrogating why he was deploying it. Some of Trump’s best friends, like Peter Mandelson, are gay, yet some Africans were foolish enough to believe that Trump is anti-gay. He simply understood how human beings operate, that there are times when people fail to think, a tragic failure to think, and they just go with the flow. If you ask Africans today what they gained from the perceived homophobia that Trump projected, which we know was political theatre targeted at a particular audience, they will not be able to tell you. Trump might be many things to many people. I do not like him and everybody knows that, but the one thing I respect him for is that he understands his audience. He knows what to say when he is talking to foolish people. He knows what to say when he is talking to idiotic people. He knows what to say when he is talking to sycophants. He knows what to say when he is talking to people who do not understand the world of politics, and he gets away with it. And for that, I give it to him. He becomes a political superstar precisely because you then have black people in Africa supporting him. That in itself shows you the scale of political illiteracy that exists, where people rally behind rhetoric crafted to manipulate them, not to advance their interests.

I think the presenter is on to something big, but where I disagree with her is that she accuses African leaders and gives a subtle pass to African citizens. It is not true that African citizens were oblivious to what Trump or Epstein are. They knew, but they simply did not have the ability to think critically that when Trump talks about LGBT issues, it is not necessarily that he does not support them, but that he understood there is a group of foolish people out there who would buy into that rhetoric without interrogating why he was deploying it. Some of Trump’s best friends, like Peter Mandelson, are gay, yet some Africans were foolish enough to believe that Trump is anti-gay. He simply understood how human beings operate, that there are times when people fail to think, a tragic failure to think, and they just go with the flow. If you ask Africans today what they gained from the perceived homophobia that Trump projected, which we know was political theatre targeted at a particular audience, they will not be able to tell you. Trump might be many things to many people. I do not like him and everybody knows that, but the one thing I respect him for is that he understands his audience. He knows what to say when he is talking to foolish people. He knows what to say when he is talking to idiotic people. He knows what to say when he is talking to sycophants. He knows what to say when he is talking to people who do not understand the world of politics, and he gets away with it. And for that, I give it to him. He becomes a political superstar precisely because you then have black people in Africa supporting him. That in itself shows you the scale of political illiteracy that exists, where people rally behind rhetoric crafted to manipulate them, not to advance their interests.

Hopewell Chin’ono

20,339 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"Some of the sharpest applause came when Conway warned that legislation alone would not constrain Trump. 'We can pass the ‘Everything is Better’ bill …. And he’s going to ignore it,' he said. 'He is not going to obey the law, because he doesn’t. He’s a criminal, and we have to put an end to [his presidency]."

"Some of the sharpest applause came when Conway warned that legislation alone would not constrain Trump. 'We can pass the ‘Everything is Better’ bill …. And he’s going to ignore it,' he said. 'He is not going to obey the law, because he doesn’t. He’s a criminal, and we have to put an end to [his presidency]."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

989,699 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Pat Riley on LeBron James: “As far as the 24 year veteran that is something that would happen organically. I hope I’m not talking out of both sides of my mouth here but you never know that you’re ever going to win a title until you win one. But you’ll never win one if you don’t have the talent and the coaching to do it… from that standpoint you know this is the team we have now this is Spo's challenge and I'm happy with it he knows what he wants. He knows what he has to do. It's a day to day process”

Pat Riley on LeBron James: “As far as the 24 year veteran that is something that would happen organically. I hope I’m not talking out of both sides of my mouth here but you never know that you’re ever going to win a title until you win one. But you’ll never win one if you don’t have the talent and the coaching to do it… from that standpoint you know this is the team we have now this is Spo's challenge and I'm happy with it he knows what he wants. He knows what he has to do. It's a day to day process”

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

56,437 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Last weekend, Tucker Carlson claimed the CIA has been surveilling his text messages. That may be true, but he didn't provide any evidence that it was true. Is this disturbing? Well, it kind of depends, right? It depends on the facts of what actually happened. There are really two options here. Option #1 is the CIA very well may be abusing their power. They may be weaponizing the power of the federal government to try to intimidate Tucker, which is a violation of the law. They cannot use the power of the CIA to target a private citizen simply because they disagree with his political views. And if this is the case, it is awful. Option #2 is Tucker may have done something wrong. We don't know. He may have, he may not have. Who was Tucker talking to in Iran? Was he just talking to the Iranian people? Was he talking to Iranian media figures? Was he talking to members of the Iranian Islamic theocratic regime whom we are at war with? Was he just asking questions about what's happening inside Iran? Was he trying to ascertain their experience, opinions, and positions? Or, was he engaging in conversations where he also provided sensitive information to our war enemy, Iran? He's been to Oval Office several times recently and his son works for VP JD Vance. Obviously, Tucker Carlson has inside access to a lot of information that the Iranian regime does not. The CIA denied there's an investigation of Carlson—according to journalist Marc Caputo—but I don't take the CIA's word at face value either. So we're left with this he said-he said. Time will tell...

Last weekend, Tucker Carlson claimed the CIA has been surveilling his text messages. That may be true, but he didn't provide any evidence that it was true. Is this disturbing? Well, it kind of depends, right? It depends on the facts of what actually happened. There are really two options here. Option #1 is the CIA very well may be abusing their power. They may be weaponizing the power of the federal government to try to intimidate Tucker, which is a violation of the law. They cannot use the power of the CIA to target a private citizen simply because they disagree with his political views. And if this is the case, it is awful. Option #2 is Tucker may have done something wrong. We don't know. He may have, he may not have. Who was Tucker talking to in Iran? Was he just talking to the Iranian people? Was he talking to Iranian media figures? Was he talking to members of the Iranian Islamic theocratic regime whom we are at war with? Was he just asking questions about what's happening inside Iran? Was he trying to ascertain their experience, opinions, and positions? Or, was he engaging in conversations where he also provided sensitive information to our war enemy, Iran? He's been to Oval Office several times recently and his son works for VP JD Vance. Obviously, Tucker Carlson has inside access to a lot of information that the Iranian regime does not. The CIA denied there's an investigation of Carlson—according to journalist Marc Caputo—but I don't take the CIA's word at face value either. So we're left with this he said-he said. Time will tell...

Liz Wheeler

13,062 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is why Peter Navarro is in jail, because he is a patriot and a truth teller. “I’m in the situation room and Fauci walks in. I had no idea who that guy was but I could tell this dude thinks he’s a lot smarter than he really is. I didn’t know he killed a bunch of people with the aids epidemic but that’s another story. Fauci knew the whole time that the virus came from a lab and he helped create it. If he would have just been honest with us we could’ve used the genome to create an actual vaccine, but he didn’t, so we gave out the crap they made instead. Trump was lied to.”

This is why Peter Navarro is in jail, because he is a patriot and a truth teller. “I’m in the situation room and Fauci walks in. I had no idea who that guy was but I could tell this dude thinks he’s a lot smarter than he really is. I didn’t know he killed a bunch of people with the aids epidemic but that’s another story. Fauci knew the whole time that the virus came from a lab and he helped create it. If he would have just been honest with us we could’ve used the genome to create an actual vaccine, but he didn’t, so we gave out the crap they made instead. Trump was lied to.”

Uncommon Sense

354,985 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren