正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🎙️ TV Program Aired: “Israel Can’t Lead While Türkiye Exists” This episode is built around Prof. Stephen M. Walt’s recent article “Israel Can’t Be a Hegemon” published in Foreign Policy. In the program, we examine Türkiye’s regional role through a multidimensional strategic lens — highlighting: ✅ Legitimacy as a...

EsenErmisErturk's profile picture

Esen Ermiş Ertürk

40,232 subscribers

373,683 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Turkish President Erdogan on EU: Strategic blindness toward Türkiye unfortunately still clearly exists in many institutions of the Union. It must now be understood that a European Union without Türkiye as a full member will not become a global actor or a center of attraction. We are not a country whose value is remembered only when needed, whose door is knocked on when necessary, and which is sidelined at other times. We never have been, and we never will be. The European Union must fully appreciate Türkiye’s constructive stance and must not misuse it. It should refrain from actions and rhetoric that would put this at risk. Let it not be forgotten: neither is Türkiye the old Türkiye, nor is the world the same world confined to the sphere of influence of Western states. A new world is being built—one where regional cooperation is gaining importance, new actors are emerging, and the global system is rapidly evolving toward multipolarity. Türkiye is among the strongest countries poised to become one of the poles of this new system. Today, Europe’s need for Türkiye is greater than Türkiye’s need for Europe. And this need will grow even more tomorrow. Europe is at a crossroads: Either it will see Türkiye’s growing power and global weight as an opportunity to overcome its bottleneck, or it will allow exclusionary rhetoric to darken Europe’s future. Our hope is that decision-makers in Europe will abandon their political and historical prejudices and focus on developing sincere, genuine, and equal-level relations with Türkiye. Such a relationship will benefit the European continent, of which Türkiye is an inseparable part.
3:10

Sensitive content

Turkish President Erdogan on EU: Strategic blindness toward Türkiye unfortunately still clearly exists in many institutions of the Union. It must now be understood that a European Union without Türkiye as a full member will not become a global actor or a center of attraction. We are not a country whose value is remembered only when needed, whose door is knocked on when necessary, and which is sidelined at other times. We never have been, and we never will be. The European Union must fully appreciate Türkiye’s constructive stance and must not misuse it. It should refrain from actions and rhetoric that would put this at risk. Let it not be forgotten: neither is Türkiye the old Türkiye, nor is the world the same world confined to the sphere of influence of Western states. A new world is being built—one where regional cooperation is gaining importance, new actors are emerging, and the global system is rapidly evolving toward multipolarity. Türkiye is among the strongest countries poised to become one of the poles of this new system. Today, Europe’s need for Türkiye is greater than Türkiye’s need for Europe. And this need will grow even more tomorrow. Europe is at a crossroads: Either it will see Türkiye’s growing power and global weight as an opportunity to overcome its bottleneck, or it will allow exclusionary rhetoric to darken Europe’s future. Our hope is that decision-makers in Europe will abandon their political and historical prejudices and focus on developing sincere, genuine, and equal-level relations with Türkiye. Such a relationship will benefit the European continent, of which Türkiye is an inseparable part.

Clash Report

141,854 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Turkey’s Rise and the Fear in Tehran & Tel Aviv. Turkey’s re-emergence as a regional power is changing the balance of the Middle East. Both Iran and Israel increasingly see Ankara as a rival, even a threat. For Iran, Turkey’s growing influence undermines Tehran’s ambition to shape the region. For Israel, it threatens the strategic dominance Tel Aviv has enjoyed for decades. Turkey has invested heavily in its defence industry. The Bayraktar drone family, the Akinci UAV, and now the stealthy Kizilelma unmanned fighter have reshaped modern battlefields from Libya to Ukraine. Advanced missile systems and naval platforms are giving Ankara unprecedented independence from U.S. and NATO suppliers. Beyond weapons, Turkey is pursuing regional influence. In Syria, Ankara is a counterweight to both Russia and Iran. In the Caucasus, it backs Azerbaijan against Armenia. Across Africa, Turkish military bases and training programs extend influence from Libya to Somalia. In the Mediterranean, disputes with Greece and Cyprus showcase Ankara’s maritime ambitions. History gives Turkey unique leverage. It possesses NATO’s second largest army, and wields cultural and religious ties that reach deep into the Muslim world. This blend of hard and soft power gives it a reach neither Iran nor Israel can easily match. Geography strengthens Ankara further. Control of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits makes it a gatekeeper between the Black Sea and Mediterranean. Its role as an energy corridor connecting Caspian, Middle Eastern and European markets adds another layer of strategic weight. Even under severe economic crisis and inflation, Turkey is doubling down on defence and geopolitical manoeuvring. For both Tehran and Tel Aviv, this resilience is unnerving. For Iran, Turkey’s military technology and its Sunni-led influence threaten Tehran’s regional narrative. For Israel, Turkey’s expanding arsenal and growing leadership across the Muslim world challenge its position as the region’s undisputed military power. The fea..r is clear: if Ankara continues on its current trajectory, it may emerge not just as a player — but as the decisive power in the Middle East.
2:21

🚨 Turkey’s Rise and the Fear in Tehran & Tel Aviv. Turkey’s re-emergence as a regional power is changing the balance of the Middle East. Both Iran and Israel increasingly see Ankara as a rival, even a threat. For Iran, Turkey’s growing influence undermines Tehran’s ambition to shape the region. For Israel, it threatens the strategic dominance Tel Aviv has enjoyed for decades. Turkey has invested heavily in its defence industry. The Bayraktar drone family, the Akinci UAV, and now the stealthy Kizilelma unmanned fighter have reshaped modern battlefields from Libya to Ukraine. Advanced missile systems and naval platforms are giving Ankara unprecedented independence from U.S. and NATO suppliers. Beyond weapons, Turkey is pursuing regional influence. In Syria, Ankara is a counterweight to both Russia and Iran. In the Caucasus, it backs Azerbaijan against Armenia. Across Africa, Turkish military bases and training programs extend influence from Libya to Somalia. In the Mediterranean, disputes with Greece and Cyprus showcase Ankara’s maritime ambitions. History gives Turkey unique leverage. It possesses NATO’s second largest army, and wields cultural and religious ties that reach deep into the Muslim world. This blend of hard and soft power gives it a reach neither Iran nor Israel can easily match. Geography strengthens Ankara further. Control of the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits makes it a gatekeeper between the Black Sea and Mediterranean. Its role as an energy corridor connecting Caspian, Middle Eastern and European markets adds another layer of strategic weight. Even under severe economic crisis and inflation, Turkey is doubling down on defence and geopolitical manoeuvring. For both Tehran and Tel Aviv, this resilience is unnerving. For Iran, Turkey’s military technology and its Sunni-led influence threaten Tehran’s regional narrative. For Israel, Turkey’s expanding arsenal and growing leadership across the Muslim world challenge its position as the region’s undisputed military power. The fea..r is clear: if Ankara continues on its current trajectory, it may emerge not just as a player — but as the decisive power in the Middle East.

Defence Index

53,348 次观看 • 11 个月前

IRAQ 🇮🇶 NEW GOVERNMENT OFFICIALLY BEGINS Iraq 🇮🇶 has entered a new governing chapter. Prime Minister Mr. Ali Falah Al-Zaidi has officially assumed his duties as head of government and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, following the formal handover ceremony with former Prime Minister Mr. Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani at the Government Palace in Baghdad. The symbolism matters. The national anthem, the honor guard representing Iraq’s armed forces, and the artillery salute all marked more than a ceremony — they marked the constitutional transfer of executive authority and the beginning of a new political cycle. In his first address to the Iraqi 🇮🇶 people, Al-Zaidi placed the emphasis exactly where Iraq needs it most: ✅national partnership, ✅economic reform, ✅protection of public funds, ✅anti-corruption, ✅youth employment, ✅stronger services, ✅healthcare, ✅education, ✅infrastructure, ✅sovereignty, and ✅balanced regional and international relations. His message was clear: the next phase cannot be built on slogans. It must be built on institutions, law, justice, and measurable delivery. The most important economic signal was his pledge to launch a comprehensive financial and economic reform program aimed at building a diversified, sustainable national economy — one that does not remain dependent on a single resource. That means : ✅industry, ✅agriculture, ✅tourism, ✅investment, ✅private sector growth, and ✅Iraqi talent must now move from talking points into execution. This is where the Central Bank, fiscal discipline, banking reform, anti-corruption controls, and dollar-access modernization become central. A stronger state requires a stronger financial system. A stronger Iraqi dinar requires confidence, stability, transparency, and productive growth — not speculation. Al-Zaidi also presided over the first regular meeting of the Council of Ministers, signaling that the government is moving immediately from ceremony to administration. Iraq’s opportunity now is discipline. If this government can turn partnership into policy, reform into implementation, and stability into investor confidence, then this moment may be remembered as more than a transfer of power. It may be remembered as the opening step toward a more institutional, sovereign, and economically resilient Iraq.
11:26

IRAQ 🇮🇶 NEW GOVERNMENT OFFICIALLY BEGINS Iraq 🇮🇶 has entered a new governing chapter. Prime Minister Mr. Ali Falah Al-Zaidi has officially assumed his duties as head of government and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, following the formal handover ceremony with former Prime Minister Mr. Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani at the Government Palace in Baghdad. The symbolism matters. The national anthem, the honor guard representing Iraq’s armed forces, and the artillery salute all marked more than a ceremony — they marked the constitutional transfer of executive authority and the beginning of a new political cycle. In his first address to the Iraqi 🇮🇶 people, Al-Zaidi placed the emphasis exactly where Iraq needs it most: ✅national partnership, ✅economic reform, ✅protection of public funds, ✅anti-corruption, ✅youth employment, ✅stronger services, ✅healthcare, ✅education, ✅infrastructure, ✅sovereignty, and ✅balanced regional and international relations. His message was clear: the next phase cannot be built on slogans. It must be built on institutions, law, justice, and measurable delivery. The most important economic signal was his pledge to launch a comprehensive financial and economic reform program aimed at building a diversified, sustainable national economy — one that does not remain dependent on a single resource. That means : ✅industry, ✅agriculture, ✅tourism, ✅investment, ✅private sector growth, and ✅Iraqi talent must now move from talking points into execution. This is where the Central Bank, fiscal discipline, banking reform, anti-corruption controls, and dollar-access modernization become central. A stronger state requires a stronger financial system. A stronger Iraqi dinar requires confidence, stability, transparency, and productive growth — not speculation. Al-Zaidi also presided over the first regular meeting of the Council of Ministers, signaling that the government is moving immediately from ceremony to administration. Iraq’s opportunity now is discipline. If this government can turn partnership into policy, reform into implementation, and stability into investor confidence, then this moment may be remembered as more than a transfer of power. It may be remembered as the opening step toward a more institutional, sovereign, and economically resilient Iraq.

GP Q

13,267 次观看 • 2 个月前

The upcoming weeks could be a period that requires close attention in terms of the geopolitical direction of East Africa. The overall picture in Addis Ababa indicates that the region is passing through a critical threshold. We are in Addis Ababa as part of President Erdoğan’s visit to Ethiopia. 1. This year marks the 100th anniversary of Ethiopia–Türkiye relations. Türkiye’s first embassy in Sub-Saharan Africa was opened in Addis Ababa in 1926. The main theme of the visit, consistent with this historical continuity, is a “Permanent Partnership.” 2. Ethiopia occupies an extremely sensitive position within the conflict-prone and competitive environment of the Horn of Africa. The leadership seeks to consolidate its position on issues it considers vital. At the same time, it tends to turn any emerging opportunity into a strategic gain. 3. However, growing demographic pressure, economic challenges, the fatigue of internal conflict, and other domestic vulnerabilities-combined with the structural disadvantages of being a landlocked country-are pushing Addis Ababa toward alternative strategic options. 4. In this context, the strategy of “access to the sea” is seen as a form of strategic relief-both for managing internal pressures and deepening regional influence. Creating economic breathing space, reducing logistical dependence, and increasing strategic maneuverability are the core motivations behind this approach. 5. This places Ethiopia in a difficult equation: it must produce policy within a competitive-and at times confrontational-regional environment where its ambitions may clash with the sovereignty sensitivities of its neighbors. The search for maritime access therefore stands out as an issue that could easily harden the region’s fragile balance. 6. Its closer alignment with the UAE in the Sudan civil war reflects the cumulative pressures of multiple security and economic challenges. Recent developments suggest that Ethiopia may seek a more active and visible role in the Sudan file in the near term. 7. At the same time, military movements along the Eritrean border carry risks that could trigger a new confrontation. For Ethiopia, the Eritrea issue is directly linked to its most critical maritime option. Access to the sea through Assab remains central to its strategic thinking. Historical grievances and current security concerns are deeply intertwined in this file. 8. Another critical relationship is with Egypt. The core issue here is the Nile Basin and water security. While the GERD dam represents energy production, development, and strategic leverage for Ethiopia, it is perceived by Egypt as a high-risk scenario. What began as a technical water management issue has evolved into a geopolitical matter directly tied to regional power balances. 9. When regional dynamics and the engagement of external actors are considered together, it becomes clear that Ethiopia is navigating a multilayered but high-risk foreign policy landscape-one that affects fault lines across North Africa, the Middle East, the Gulf, and the Horn of Africa. 10. Within this broader tension environment, Türkiye-Ethiopia relations remain in a positive trajectory. Despite differences in certain areas, the potential for deeper cooperation is high. Today, both leaders delivered strong messages in this direction. 11. President Erdoğan’s visit comes at a time when regional conflict dynamics are becoming increasingly visible. Ankara is seeking to develop a balancing approach aimed at preventing potential conflicts and lowering rising regional tensions. Given that Türkiye has both direct and indirect interests tied to the nature of its relationship with Ethiopia, the process is being managed with careful strategic consideration. 12. From arrival to departure, President Erdoğan was warmly received in Addis Ababa. The key areas of focus included economic cooperation, defense industry partnerships, and critical regional issues. Murat Yeşiltaş SETA
0:20

The upcoming weeks could be a period that requires close attention in terms of the geopolitical direction of East Africa. The overall picture in Addis Ababa indicates that the region is passing through a critical threshold. We are in Addis Ababa as part of President Erdoğan’s visit to Ethiopia. 1. This year marks the 100th anniversary of Ethiopia–Türkiye relations. Türkiye’s first embassy in Sub-Saharan Africa was opened in Addis Ababa in 1926. The main theme of the visit, consistent with this historical continuity, is a “Permanent Partnership.” 2. Ethiopia occupies an extremely sensitive position within the conflict-prone and competitive environment of the Horn of Africa. The leadership seeks to consolidate its position on issues it considers vital. At the same time, it tends to turn any emerging opportunity into a strategic gain. 3. However, growing demographic pressure, economic challenges, the fatigue of internal conflict, and other domestic vulnerabilities-combined with the structural disadvantages of being a landlocked country-are pushing Addis Ababa toward alternative strategic options. 4. In this context, the strategy of “access to the sea” is seen as a form of strategic relief-both for managing internal pressures and deepening regional influence. Creating economic breathing space, reducing logistical dependence, and increasing strategic maneuverability are the core motivations behind this approach. 5. This places Ethiopia in a difficult equation: it must produce policy within a competitive-and at times confrontational-regional environment where its ambitions may clash with the sovereignty sensitivities of its neighbors. The search for maritime access therefore stands out as an issue that could easily harden the region’s fragile balance. 6. Its closer alignment with the UAE in the Sudan civil war reflects the cumulative pressures of multiple security and economic challenges. Recent developments suggest that Ethiopia may seek a more active and visible role in the Sudan file in the near term. 7. At the same time, military movements along the Eritrean border carry risks that could trigger a new confrontation. For Ethiopia, the Eritrea issue is directly linked to its most critical maritime option. Access to the sea through Assab remains central to its strategic thinking. Historical grievances and current security concerns are deeply intertwined in this file. 8. Another critical relationship is with Egypt. The core issue here is the Nile Basin and water security. While the GERD dam represents energy production, development, and strategic leverage for Ethiopia, it is perceived by Egypt as a high-risk scenario. What began as a technical water management issue has evolved into a geopolitical matter directly tied to regional power balances. 9. When regional dynamics and the engagement of external actors are considered together, it becomes clear that Ethiopia is navigating a multilayered but high-risk foreign policy landscape-one that affects fault lines across North Africa, the Middle East, the Gulf, and the Horn of Africa. 10. Within this broader tension environment, Türkiye-Ethiopia relations remain in a positive trajectory. Despite differences in certain areas, the potential for deeper cooperation is high. Today, both leaders delivered strong messages in this direction. 11. President Erdoğan’s visit comes at a time when regional conflict dynamics are becoming increasingly visible. Ankara is seeking to develop a balancing approach aimed at preventing potential conflicts and lowering rising regional tensions. Given that Türkiye has both direct and indirect interests tied to the nature of its relationship with Ethiopia, the process is being managed with careful strategic consideration. 12. From arrival to departure, President Erdoğan was warmly received in Addis Ababa. The key areas of focus included economic cooperation, defense industry partnerships, and critical regional issues. Murat Yeşiltaş SETA

Tunç Demirtaş

14,131 次观看 • 5 个月前

"A blockade is an act of war. Literally an act of war." ⚠️ Scott Ritter (Scott Ritter) exposes the lethal reality behind the latest U.S. strategy. He argues that the current operations have "zero legitimacy constitutionally and zero legitimacy under international law," branding the move as an "illegal act of war" rather than a legitimate duty. Strategic Leverage: Ritter claims Iran has "outplayed this president in every way, shape and form" by preserving its core military capabilities. Failed Deterrence: While the U.S. focuses on destroying Iran's traditional naval power, Iran’s "ballistic missile and drone capabilities" remain the true foundation of their response. The Consequence: Recent strikes proved Iran has the political will to "punish the attackers" and put all regional infrastructure at risk. Watch this explosive episode of Daniel Davis Deep Dive to see why the Hormuz blockade is a strategic disaster. 👇 👉 #StraitOfHormuz #ScottRitter #ActOfWar #USStrategy #IranWar #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity
3:26

"A blockade is an act of war. Literally an act of war." ⚠️ Scott Ritter (Scott Ritter) exposes the lethal reality behind the latest U.S. strategy. He argues that the current operations have "zero legitimacy constitutionally and zero legitimacy under international law," branding the move as an "illegal act of war" rather than a legitimate duty. Strategic Leverage: Ritter claims Iran has "outplayed this president in every way, shape and form" by preserving its core military capabilities. Failed Deterrence: While the U.S. focuses on destroying Iran's traditional naval power, Iran’s "ballistic missile and drone capabilities" remain the true foundation of their response. The Consequence: Recent strikes proved Iran has the political will to "punish the attackers" and put all regional infrastructure at risk. Watch this explosive episode of Daniel Davis Deep Dive to see why the Hormuz blockade is a strategic disaster. 👇 👉 #StraitOfHormuz #ScottRitter #ActOfWar #USStrategy #IranWar #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

23,786 次观看 • 3 个月前

I am not sure, but we are probably the only ones standing up to the big Chinese brands in this 'portable energy' industry🤷🏻‍♂️ , a David VS Goliath situation, but we ain't backing down ⚠️ Solar charge testing our new Zedtron-X power system with one of our engineers✅. On a sunny day, the solar panel will charge it from 0-100% in 4-5hrs. I like to show you everything as raw as it can get for authenticity Rugged design frame, 1.2Kwh Lifepo4 battery, 600watts pure sine wave power It will run ur 50 inch LED TV +decoder +regular standing fan+ smartphone +energy bulbs for 6hrs⚡️ Solid Energy independence for u✅ We will also be revamping our larger TITAN models specially built for homes & businesses ✅ This X model is still available on pre-order Just send a WhatsApp msg to 08183093568 The current price without the solar panel is ₦395,000 and ₦475,000 with the solar panel and it's accessories ✅ Buy Made in Nigeria products Support our indigenous businesses #Zedora #madeinNigeria 🇳🇬
0:30

I am not sure, but we are probably the only ones standing up to the big Chinese brands in this 'portable energy' industry🤷🏻‍♂️ , a David VS Goliath situation, but we ain't backing down ⚠️ Solar charge testing our new Zedtron-X power system with one of our engineers✅. On a sunny day, the solar panel will charge it from 0-100% in 4-5hrs. I like to show you everything as raw as it can get for authenticity Rugged design frame, 1.2Kwh Lifepo4 battery, 600watts pure sine wave power It will run ur 50 inch LED TV +decoder +regular standing fan+ smartphone +energy bulbs for 6hrs⚡️ Solid Energy independence for u✅ We will also be revamping our larger TITAN models specially built for homes & businesses ✅ This X model is still available on pre-order Just send a WhatsApp msg to 08183093568 The current price without the solar panel is ₦395,000 and ₦475,000 with the solar panel and it's accessories ✅ Buy Made in Nigeria products Support our indigenous businesses #Zedora #madeinNigeria 🇳🇬

Ziko Abara

13,989 次观看 • 4 个月前

From “Hezbollah Is Defeated” to “Hezbollah Is Everywhere”: How Threat Inflation Becomes Strategy Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent claim that “Iran is in cahoots with Venezuela and is sending Hezbollah to the United States” marks a dramatic escalation in rhetoric, and a revealing shift in Israel’s strategic messaging. Only weeks earlier, Netanyahu and senior Israeli military officials were publicly asserting that Hezbollah’s capabilities had been largely dismantled. Now, the same actor is being presented not as weakened or contained, but as globally mobile, operating in Latin America and preparing attacks on U.S. soil. This contradiction is not incidental. It reflects a familiar pattern: as regional justifications lose force, the threat narrative expands geographically. When Hezbollah is no longer sufficient as a local enemy, it is reimagined as a hemispheric or even global one. The purpose of this expansion is not descriptive, it is political. It is designed to internationalize Israel’s wars and shift their burden outward. 📌The Strategic Function of Linking Iran to Venezuela The attempt to connect Iran, Hezbollah, and Venezuela is not a security discovery; it is a political construction. By invoking Venezuela, a state already framed in Washington as hostile, Netanyahu inserts Israel’s conflict into America’s own ideological and strategic architecture. This framing does not merely seek sympathy; it seeks entanglement. If Iran is no longer just a Middle Eastern actor but a Latin American one, then Israel’s war is no longer regional. It becomes America’s problem, America’s security, America’s war. 📌From Regional War to Global Escalation In recent years, Israel’s leadership has increasingly framed its conflicts not as territorial or political disputes, but as civilizational confrontations, “the free world versus barbarism,” “democracy versus terror,” and now, “Iran everywhere.” This logic contains a built-in escalatory mechanism: no victory is ever sufficient, because the threat is never localized or finite. It is always elsewhere, always expanding, always metastasizing. In this sense, the rhetoric does not aim to prevent war. It aims to normalize permanence, a condition in which war is not an event, but an environment. A regional war is dangerous but containable. A globalized war is open-ended, and therefore permanently mobilizing. 📌The Political Incentive Behind Permanent Crisis Netanyahu governs through crisis. Crisis postpones accountability, suppresses dissent, delays political reckoning, and overrides normal legal and democratic constraints. By presenting Israel not as a state among others but as the frontline of a global civilizational war, Netanyahu elevates his government from a political authority into a perceived necessity, insulated from criticism because it is framed as indispensable. This is why ceasefires are treated as defeats, de-escalation as danger, and diplomacy as appeasement. Peace is destabilizing, because peace returns politics. 📌Manufacturing a Global Enemy to Sustain a Permanent War The claim about Iran, Hezbollah, and Venezuela is not primarily about intelligence. It is about narrative control. It is the transformation of a regional conflict into a global moral emergency, one that demands permanent alignment, expanding resources, political impunity, and open-ended war. When leaders argue that enemies are everywhere, borders lose meaning, conflicts lose limits, and wars lose endpoints. What is being defended is no longer a state. It is a system of permanent confrontation. And in such a system, the greatest danger is not that war will spread unintentionally, but that it is being deliberately pushed outward.
0:23

From “Hezbollah Is Defeated” to “Hezbollah Is Everywhere”: How Threat Inflation Becomes Strategy Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent claim that “Iran is in cahoots with Venezuela and is sending Hezbollah to the United States” marks a dramatic escalation in rhetoric, and a revealing shift in Israel’s strategic messaging. Only weeks earlier, Netanyahu and senior Israeli military officials were publicly asserting that Hezbollah’s capabilities had been largely dismantled. Now, the same actor is being presented not as weakened or contained, but as globally mobile, operating in Latin America and preparing attacks on U.S. soil. This contradiction is not incidental. It reflects a familiar pattern: as regional justifications lose force, the threat narrative expands geographically. When Hezbollah is no longer sufficient as a local enemy, it is reimagined as a hemispheric or even global one. The purpose of this expansion is not descriptive, it is political. It is designed to internationalize Israel’s wars and shift their burden outward. 📌The Strategic Function of Linking Iran to Venezuela The attempt to connect Iran, Hezbollah, and Venezuela is not a security discovery; it is a political construction. By invoking Venezuela, a state already framed in Washington as hostile, Netanyahu inserts Israel’s conflict into America’s own ideological and strategic architecture. This framing does not merely seek sympathy; it seeks entanglement. If Iran is no longer just a Middle Eastern actor but a Latin American one, then Israel’s war is no longer regional. It becomes America’s problem, America’s security, America’s war. 📌From Regional War to Global Escalation In recent years, Israel’s leadership has increasingly framed its conflicts not as territorial or political disputes, but as civilizational confrontations, “the free world versus barbarism,” “democracy versus terror,” and now, “Iran everywhere.” This logic contains a built-in escalatory mechanism: no victory is ever sufficient, because the threat is never localized or finite. It is always elsewhere, always expanding, always metastasizing. In this sense, the rhetoric does not aim to prevent war. It aims to normalize permanence, a condition in which war is not an event, but an environment. A regional war is dangerous but containable. A globalized war is open-ended, and therefore permanently mobilizing. 📌The Political Incentive Behind Permanent Crisis Netanyahu governs through crisis. Crisis postpones accountability, suppresses dissent, delays political reckoning, and overrides normal legal and democratic constraints. By presenting Israel not as a state among others but as the frontline of a global civilizational war, Netanyahu elevates his government from a political authority into a perceived necessity, insulated from criticism because it is framed as indispensable. This is why ceasefires are treated as defeats, de-escalation as danger, and diplomacy as appeasement. Peace is destabilizing, because peace returns politics. 📌Manufacturing a Global Enemy to Sustain a Permanent War The claim about Iran, Hezbollah, and Venezuela is not primarily about intelligence. It is about narrative control. It is the transformation of a regional conflict into a global moral emergency, one that demands permanent alignment, expanding resources, political impunity, and open-ended war. When leaders argue that enemies are everywhere, borders lose meaning, conflicts lose limits, and wars lose endpoints. What is being defended is no longer a state. It is a system of permanent confrontation. And in such a system, the greatest danger is not that war will spread unintentionally, but that it is being deliberately pushed outward.

Ibrahim Majed

33,500 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇹🇷 Ottoman Empire at Sea? Turkey’s 50 Warship + Carrier Mega Build Signals a New Mediterranean Superpower Era Turkey is in the middle of one of the most aggressive naval expansions in modern military history, with around 50 warships under construction simultaneously across multiple shipyards. But this isn’t just a fleet expansion, it’s a full spectrum maritime transformation. From stealth capable frigates and corvettes to amphibious assault ships, submarines, support vessels, and a future aircraft carrier program, Ankara is rapidly pushing its navy toward true blue water capability, designed to operate far beyond its own coastline. Defense analysts say the scale and speed of this buildup is not about defense alone, but about long term regional power projection across the Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, and wider strategic waterways. The comparison with Israel is increasingly unavoidable. Israel maintains one of the most advanced and combat proven air forces in the Middle East, giving it a dominant edge in airpower and precision strike capability. However, Turkey’s strategy appears focused on balancing that advantage through overwhelming maritime expansion, naval aviation development, and indigenous defense production. At the same time, Ankara is accelerating development of its own next generation fighter programs and expanding domestic aerospace capacity, signaling an ambition to control not just the seas, but also the skies over future conflict zones. The debate inside strategic circles is intensifying. Supporters call it sovereign military independence. Critics see a long term geopolitical project aimed at restoring influence across former Ottoman spheres of power. With aircraft carrier ambitions, mass shipbuilding output, and a rapidly expanding defense industry, Turkey is no longer just upgrading its navy, it is rewriting its strategic identity. The question now is no longer whether Turkey is rising… but how far it intends to go.
0:39

🇹🇷 Ottoman Empire at Sea? Turkey’s 50 Warship + Carrier Mega Build Signals a New Mediterranean Superpower Era Turkey is in the middle of one of the most aggressive naval expansions in modern military history, with around 50 warships under construction simultaneously across multiple shipyards. But this isn’t just a fleet expansion, it’s a full spectrum maritime transformation. From stealth capable frigates and corvettes to amphibious assault ships, submarines, support vessels, and a future aircraft carrier program, Ankara is rapidly pushing its navy toward true blue water capability, designed to operate far beyond its own coastline. Defense analysts say the scale and speed of this buildup is not about defense alone, but about long term regional power projection across the Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, and wider strategic waterways. The comparison with Israel is increasingly unavoidable. Israel maintains one of the most advanced and combat proven air forces in the Middle East, giving it a dominant edge in airpower and precision strike capability. However, Turkey’s strategy appears focused on balancing that advantage through overwhelming maritime expansion, naval aviation development, and indigenous defense production. At the same time, Ankara is accelerating development of its own next generation fighter programs and expanding domestic aerospace capacity, signaling an ambition to control not just the seas, but also the skies over future conflict zones. The debate inside strategic circles is intensifying. Supporters call it sovereign military independence. Critics see a long term geopolitical project aimed at restoring influence across former Ottoman spheres of power. With aircraft carrier ambitions, mass shipbuilding output, and a rapidly expanding defense industry, Turkey is no longer just upgrading its navy, it is rewriting its strategic identity. The question now is no longer whether Turkey is rising… but how far it intends to go.

War Radar

32,604 次观看 • 1 个月前

Erdogan is pivotng toward Europe to avoid being sidelined alongside Russia. He has realised that remaining a junior partner to an increasingly isolated Moscow is a strategic dead end." Erdogan’s insistence that Türkiye is "no longer the old Türkiye" is a threat disguised as an invitation. By positioning himself as a candidate for a "leading pole" in a new global system, he is telling the EU that if they don't accept him on his terms, he will take his "constructive stance" elsewhere. But his sudden urgency to revive the accession bid reveals the bluff: for all his talk of multipolarity, Erdogan is leaning toward Europe because he realises that being a junior partner to an increasingly isolated Russia is a dead end. Ultimately, this is the same old Erdogan: a merchant of influence trying to sell a tarnished brand of democracy to a continent that knows the price of admission is more than just strategic geography. Turkish President Erdogan on the EU: 💬 "Strategic blindness toward Türkiye unfortunately still clearly exists in many institutions of the Union. My esteemed citizens, at this point, I must state a fact frankly. Just as yesterday, the issue today is not where Ankara stands. The question is where Brussels wants to be in the world of the future. It's about where you see yourself. It should now be understood that a European Union without Türkiye as a full member will not be a global actor and center of attraction. We are not a country whose existence will be remembered only when needed, whose door will be knocked on when necessary, and which will be pushed aside in other times. We never will be. The European Union should appreciate Türkiye's constructive approach very much. We shouldn't misuse it. They should refrain from actions and statements that would make this difficult. Let it not be forgotten that neither is Türkiye the same Turkey it once was, nor is the world as confined to the sphere of influence of Western states as it once was. A new world is being built where regional collaborations are gaining importance, new actors are emerging, and the global system is rapidly evolving towards multipolarity, and Turkey is among the strongest candidates to become one of the leading poles of this new system. Look, I’ll be frank. Today, Europe's need for Türkiye is greater than Türkiye's need for Europe. This need will increase even more tomorrow. Europe is at a crossroads. They will either see Türkiye’s growing power and global influence as an opportunity for the union to emerge from its current predicament, or they will allow exclusionary rhetoric to darken Europe's future. Our hope is that decision-makers in Europe will finally abandon their political and historical prejudices and focus on developing sincere, genuine, and fair relations with Türkiye. The winner of such a relationship would be the European continent, of which Türkiye is an integral part."
3:10

Erdogan is pivotng toward Europe to avoid being sidelined alongside Russia. He has realised that remaining a junior partner to an increasingly isolated Moscow is a strategic dead end." Erdogan’s insistence that Türkiye is "no longer the old Türkiye" is a threat disguised as an invitation. By positioning himself as a candidate for a "leading pole" in a new global system, he is telling the EU that if they don't accept him on his terms, he will take his "constructive stance" elsewhere. But his sudden urgency to revive the accession bid reveals the bluff: for all his talk of multipolarity, Erdogan is leaning toward Europe because he realises that being a junior partner to an increasingly isolated Russia is a dead end. Ultimately, this is the same old Erdogan: a merchant of influence trying to sell a tarnished brand of democracy to a continent that knows the price of admission is more than just strategic geography. Turkish President Erdogan on the EU: 💬 "Strategic blindness toward Türkiye unfortunately still clearly exists in many institutions of the Union. My esteemed citizens, at this point, I must state a fact frankly. Just as yesterday, the issue today is not where Ankara stands. The question is where Brussels wants to be in the world of the future. It's about where you see yourself. It should now be understood that a European Union without Türkiye as a full member will not be a global actor and center of attraction. We are not a country whose existence will be remembered only when needed, whose door will be knocked on when necessary, and which will be pushed aside in other times. We never will be. The European Union should appreciate Türkiye's constructive approach very much. We shouldn't misuse it. They should refrain from actions and statements that would make this difficult. Let it not be forgotten that neither is Türkiye the same Turkey it once was, nor is the world as confined to the sphere of influence of Western states as it once was. A new world is being built where regional collaborations are gaining importance, new actors are emerging, and the global system is rapidly evolving towards multipolarity, and Turkey is among the strongest candidates to become one of the leading poles of this new system. Look, I’ll be frank. Today, Europe's need for Türkiye is greater than Türkiye's need for Europe. This need will increase even more tomorrow. Europe is at a crossroads. They will either see Türkiye’s growing power and global influence as an opportunity for the union to emerge from its current predicament, or they will allow exclusionary rhetoric to darken Europe's future. Our hope is that decision-makers in Europe will finally abandon their political and historical prejudices and focus on developing sincere, genuine, and fair relations with Türkiye. The winner of such a relationship would be the European continent, of which Türkiye is an integral part."

Yasmina

142,922 次观看 • 3 个月前

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!
2:50

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!

Praffulgarg

34,818 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Israel Admits To Blackmailing Trump with Epstein Files?! 🚨 This is not clickbait. My Bro 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 just dropped this bombshell video on his channel - be sure to go FOLLOW him on X. According to a shocking piece published by the Times of Israel, Rabbi Yosef Janowski has openly suggested that Donald Trump’s recent “out of character” behavior stems from his criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu — and that Israel is now “flexing its muscles” by threatening him with Jeffrey Epstein’s files. The rabbi literally says the files had been dormant… until Trump blasted Netanyahu over Gaza and Syria. Then, suddenly, they “surfaced” and began “overwhelming him.” Let that sink in: a foreign religious leader — speaking in a major Israeli news outlet — implying direct blackmail of a former U.S. president using one of the most explosive scandals in modern history. And this comes the SAME WEEK the U.S. floated legislation to withhold federal disaster aid from any U.S. state that boycotts Israel financially. Imagine your home is destroyed in a hurricane, and FEMA says, “Sorry, your state criticized Israel — no help for you.” Whether you believe this rabbi speaks for anyone in power or not, the fact is: ✅ This was published in the Times of Israel. ✅ The words are on record. ✅ No denial from Trump’s camp (yet). If true, it’s not just an international scandal — it’s a direct attack on U.S. sovereignty. Americans deserve answers. Deny it or confirm it — but staying silent is not an option. 💥Go Check out the full video on his Youtube and give him a LIKE and subscribe as well. please and thank you 🙏
10:48

🚨 BREAKING: Israel Admits To Blackmailing Trump with Epstein Files?! 🚨 This is not clickbait. My Bro 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 just dropped this bombshell video on his channel - be sure to go FOLLOW him on X. According to a shocking piece published by the Times of Israel, Rabbi Yosef Janowski has openly suggested that Donald Trump’s recent “out of character” behavior stems from his criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu — and that Israel is now “flexing its muscles” by threatening him with Jeffrey Epstein’s files. The rabbi literally says the files had been dormant… until Trump blasted Netanyahu over Gaza and Syria. Then, suddenly, they “surfaced” and began “overwhelming him.” Let that sink in: a foreign religious leader — speaking in a major Israeli news outlet — implying direct blackmail of a former U.S. president using one of the most explosive scandals in modern history. And this comes the SAME WEEK the U.S. floated legislation to withhold federal disaster aid from any U.S. state that boycotts Israel financially. Imagine your home is destroyed in a hurricane, and FEMA says, “Sorry, your state criticized Israel — no help for you.” Whether you believe this rabbi speaks for anyone in power or not, the fact is: ✅ This was published in the Times of Israel. ✅ The words are on record. ✅ No denial from Trump’s camp (yet). If true, it’s not just an international scandal — it’s a direct attack on U.S. sovereignty. Americans deserve answers. Deny it or confirm it — but staying silent is not an option. 💥Go Check out the full video on his Youtube and give him a LIKE and subscribe as well. please and thank you 🙏

Project Constitution

15,926 次观看 • 1 年前

Renowned Turkish journalist Nazlı Çelik recently visited the TURKSOM Military Base in Somalia, and her report, aired on Star TV’s evening news, provided a detailed look into Türkiye’s support for the Somali military and its broader efforts to foster peace in the region. The feature showcased how the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) play a pivotal role in training Somali soldiers, including specialized instruction in urban warfare and counter-terrorism at the Anadolu Barracks. TURKSOM, one of Türkiye’s largest overseas military bases, has been operational since 2017 and serves as the backbone for building the Somali National Army (SNA). The report highlighted that TURKSOM has trained thousands of Somali officers and non-commissioned officers, equipping them with both theoretical and practical skills. Officers undergo a three-year training program, while NCOs complete a two-year program, all conducted in Turkish by experienced Turkish commanders. Beyond military training, the programs emphasize leadership development and building self-confidence, ensuring the trainees are prepared for the challenges they face in rebuilding their nation. The base is also home to the training of the elite Gorgor (Eagle) units, which serve as Somalia’s special forces. Since 2017, over 7,400 Gorgor soldiers have been trained, significantly bolstering Somalia’s fight against threats such as Al-Shabaab. In the feature, Somali Defense Minister Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur shared his optimism about the role of Türkiye’s support, stating that the new Gorgor graduates will enable Somalia to gain further ground against Al-Shabaab, contributing to the country’s stability and prosperity. The report also detailed how Somali commandos trained at TURKSOM continue their education in Türkiye, specifically in Isparta, where they develop advanced skills and learn the principles of military hierarchy and command. The segment included personal insights from Iman Elman, Somalia’s first female colonel, who lost her sister to terrorism. She emphasized how the training provided by Türkiye supports not only the professional but also the personal development of Somali soldiers, preparing them to become well-rounded leaders. Additionally, the report highlighted how Türkiye’s efforts extend beyond the military, contributing to the development of Somalia’s civilian capacity. Türkiye’s Ambassador to Somalia, Alper Aktaş, also featured in the broadcast, reflecting on the strong ties between the two nations. Quoting Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, Aktaş underscored the “shared destiny” between Türkiye and Somalia, highlighting the deep-rooted partnership built on mutual respect and cooperation. Nazlı Çelik’s report is one of the most comprehensive pieces to date, capturing Türkiye’s critical role in empowering the Somali military and showcasing the tangible impact of this partnership on Somalia’s journey toward peace and stability. Nazlı Çelik
10:07

Renowned Turkish journalist Nazlı Çelik recently visited the TURKSOM Military Base in Somalia, and her report, aired on Star TV’s evening news, provided a detailed look into Türkiye’s support for the Somali military and its broader efforts to foster peace in the region. The feature showcased how the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) play a pivotal role in training Somali soldiers, including specialized instruction in urban warfare and counter-terrorism at the Anadolu Barracks. TURKSOM, one of Türkiye’s largest overseas military bases, has been operational since 2017 and serves as the backbone for building the Somali National Army (SNA). The report highlighted that TURKSOM has trained thousands of Somali officers and non-commissioned officers, equipping them with both theoretical and practical skills. Officers undergo a three-year training program, while NCOs complete a two-year program, all conducted in Turkish by experienced Turkish commanders. Beyond military training, the programs emphasize leadership development and building self-confidence, ensuring the trainees are prepared for the challenges they face in rebuilding their nation. The base is also home to the training of the elite Gorgor (Eagle) units, which serve as Somalia’s special forces. Since 2017, over 7,400 Gorgor soldiers have been trained, significantly bolstering Somalia’s fight against threats such as Al-Shabaab. In the feature, Somali Defense Minister Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur shared his optimism about the role of Türkiye’s support, stating that the new Gorgor graduates will enable Somalia to gain further ground against Al-Shabaab, contributing to the country’s stability and prosperity. The report also detailed how Somali commandos trained at TURKSOM continue their education in Türkiye, specifically in Isparta, where they develop advanced skills and learn the principles of military hierarchy and command. The segment included personal insights from Iman Elman, Somalia’s first female colonel, who lost her sister to terrorism. She emphasized how the training provided by Türkiye supports not only the professional but also the personal development of Somali soldiers, preparing them to become well-rounded leaders. Additionally, the report highlighted how Türkiye’s efforts extend beyond the military, contributing to the development of Somalia’s civilian capacity. Türkiye’s Ambassador to Somalia, Alper Aktaş, also featured in the broadcast, reflecting on the strong ties between the two nations. Quoting Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, Aktaş underscored the “shared destiny” between Türkiye and Somalia, highlighting the deep-rooted partnership built on mutual respect and cooperation. Nazlı Çelik’s report is one of the most comprehensive pieces to date, capturing Türkiye’s critical role in empowering the Somali military and showcasing the tangible impact of this partnership on Somalia’s journey toward peace and stability. Nazlı Çelik

Ebuzer Demirci

26,196 次观看 • 1 年前

🇸🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱 Saudi Arabia and Israel normalization... Do it now, while you have President Trump in office. ✋ Let’s be brutally honest. The Middle East has changed a lot since October 7. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel is operating under the same strategic calculus. ❤️ I say this with genuine respect for both countries: 👉 Before October 7, Saudi–Israel normalization seemed very attractive. 🇮🇱 For Israel, it promised a breakthrough in Muslim (not only Arab) perceptions of the legitimacy of the Israeli state. 🇸🇦 For Saudi Arabia, it offered a strategic counterweight to Iran, whose influence had spread across collapsing Arab states through militias and political infiltration. 👉 But the post–October 7 geopolitical landscape is different: 🇮🇷 Iran no longer projects the aura of a rising regional hegemon... Thanks to the Israeli military and intelligence operations. 🇮🇱 Israel, after two years of direct confrontation with Iran’s strongest Arab militias and the Iranian regime itself, now stands as the dominant military power in the Middle East (perhaps only rivaled by Turkey?). 🇸🇦 Meanwhile, the Saudi leadership is recalibrating its Sunni dominance by engaging the new jihadist-leaning regime in Damascus, following the fall of the Assad regime... also Thanks to Israeli military and intelligence operations. In this new balance of power, the urgency that once propelled normalization has evaporated. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel sees an immediate, self-interested reason to rush. 🇺🇸 The only real incentive for them is to satisfy U.S. President Trump’s desire to replicate the spectacle of the Abraham Accords. ☝️ That being said, friends I trust in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, confirm the same thing: the desire for normalization is real. ⚠️ This, now, may be the most ideal window open for such a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel to happen. So, do not waste it! But if it is going to happen, it must be done now, with clarity and sincerity, not as a reactive maneuver against Iran, not as a bargaining chip with Washington, and not as a symbolic gesture. 👉 If Riyadh and Jerusalem take this step, it will reshape the region’s strategic architecture for decades. If they miss it, the opportunity may not return. 👌 Do it for the future of the Middle East.
3:21

🇸🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱 Saudi Arabia and Israel normalization... Do it now, while you have President Trump in office. ✋ Let’s be brutally honest. The Middle East has changed a lot since October 7. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel is operating under the same strategic calculus. ❤️ I say this with genuine respect for both countries: 👉 Before October 7, Saudi–Israel normalization seemed very attractive. 🇮🇱 For Israel, it promised a breakthrough in Muslim (not only Arab) perceptions of the legitimacy of the Israeli state. 🇸🇦 For Saudi Arabia, it offered a strategic counterweight to Iran, whose influence had spread across collapsing Arab states through militias and political infiltration. 👉 But the post–October 7 geopolitical landscape is different: 🇮🇷 Iran no longer projects the aura of a rising regional hegemon... Thanks to the Israeli military and intelligence operations. 🇮🇱 Israel, after two years of direct confrontation with Iran’s strongest Arab militias and the Iranian regime itself, now stands as the dominant military power in the Middle East (perhaps only rivaled by Turkey?). 🇸🇦 Meanwhile, the Saudi leadership is recalibrating its Sunni dominance by engaging the new jihadist-leaning regime in Damascus, following the fall of the Assad regime... also Thanks to Israeli military and intelligence operations. In this new balance of power, the urgency that once propelled normalization has evaporated. Neither Saudi Arabia nor Israel sees an immediate, self-interested reason to rush. 🇺🇸 The only real incentive for them is to satisfy U.S. President Trump’s desire to replicate the spectacle of the Abraham Accords. ☝️ That being said, friends I trust in both Israel and Saudi Arabia, confirm the same thing: the desire for normalization is real. ⚠️ This, now, may be the most ideal window open for such a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel to happen. So, do not waste it! But if it is going to happen, it must be done now, with clarity and sincerity, not as a reactive maneuver against Iran, not as a bargaining chip with Washington, and not as a symbolic gesture. 👉 If Riyadh and Jerusalem take this step, it will reshape the region’s strategic architecture for decades. If they miss it, the opportunity may not return. 👌 Do it for the future of the Middle East.

Dalia Ziada - داليا زيادة

35,495 次观看 • 8 个月前

If Somaliland Signs the Abraham Accords: The Day the Horn of Africa’s Geopolitics Change Forever If Somaliland were to sign the Abraham Accords in Washington alongside President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu, it would not be a symbolic gesture. It would be a geopolitical earthquake. The Abraham Accords are not merely a peace agreement between Israel and Arab states; they are the backbone of a new strategic architecture led by the United States. They bind diplomacy, security, technology, finance, and regional order into one umbrella. For a small, unrecognised state to step into that framework is to step onto the front line of global power politics. For Somaliland, this would mean one thing above all: recognition through strategy, not sentiment. When the President of the United States signs an international agreement with the President of Somaliland in the White House, the debate about whether Somaliland is a “region” or a “state” effectively ends. International law is not shaped only by declarations — it is shaped by practice. A state that enters binding covenants with Washington and Tel Aviv, and is treated as a sovereign security partner, is a state in all but name. And once America moves, others follow. Mogadishu’s claim would not collapse because of rhetoric, but because of irrelevance. The moment Washington treats Hargeisa as a strategic ally, Somalia’s narrative of “territorial integrity” loses its global audience. Power rewrites the map. Economically, the Abraham Accords would unlock a different universe for Somaliland. This is not about aid; it is about integration into the Western economic ecosystem. Israeli technology, American defence cooperation, Gulf capital, and Western financial institutions would converge on Berbera and Hargeisa. Ports become insured. Projects become bankable. Natural resources become investable. For the first time, Somaliland would move from survival to acceleration — from a brave unrecognised polity to a regional economic hub linking the Red Sea, the Gulf, and East Africa. Security is where the transformation becomes irreversible. To join the Abraham Accords is to enter the U.S.–Israel security architecture. It sends a clear message to Al-Shabaab, hostile militias, and destabilising regional actors: Somaliland is no longer a grey zone. It is now under the strategic umbrella of the world’s most powerful military alliance. That is deterrence. It also reshapes the Horn of Africa itself. Ethiopia gains a stable, Western-aligned maritime partner. The Red Sea becomes anchored by a pro-Western corridor. The Gulf gains a reliable African gateway. And the United States secures its northern Indian Ocean flank without deploying another war. This is why the rumours matter. If President Cirro walks into the White House to sign the Abraham Accords, Somaliland will not just be joining a peace agreement — it will be joining history. For decades, Somaliland built a state without recognition. The Abraham Accords would recognise the state because it already exists. And in geopolitics, legitimacy does not come from sympathy. It comes from strategic necessity. If this happens, the Horn of Africa will never look the same again. Secretary Marco Rubio U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs Israel ישראל Israel ישראלiPM العربية عاجل Abdelfattah Elsisi Barak Ravid Anita Anand Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון Kjetil Tronvoll The Globe and Mail REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND
4:25

If Somaliland Signs the Abraham Accords: The Day the Horn of Africa’s Geopolitics Change Forever If Somaliland were to sign the Abraham Accords in Washington alongside President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu, it would not be a symbolic gesture. It would be a geopolitical earthquake. The Abraham Accords are not merely a peace agreement between Israel and Arab states; they are the backbone of a new strategic architecture led by the United States. They bind diplomacy, security, technology, finance, and regional order into one umbrella. For a small, unrecognised state to step into that framework is to step onto the front line of global power politics. For Somaliland, this would mean one thing above all: recognition through strategy, not sentiment. When the President of the United States signs an international agreement with the President of Somaliland in the White House, the debate about whether Somaliland is a “region” or a “state” effectively ends. International law is not shaped only by declarations — it is shaped by practice. A state that enters binding covenants with Washington and Tel Aviv, and is treated as a sovereign security partner, is a state in all but name. And once America moves, others follow. Mogadishu’s claim would not collapse because of rhetoric, but because of irrelevance. The moment Washington treats Hargeisa as a strategic ally, Somalia’s narrative of “territorial integrity” loses its global audience. Power rewrites the map. Economically, the Abraham Accords would unlock a different universe for Somaliland. This is not about aid; it is about integration into the Western economic ecosystem. Israeli technology, American defence cooperation, Gulf capital, and Western financial institutions would converge on Berbera and Hargeisa. Ports become insured. Projects become bankable. Natural resources become investable. For the first time, Somaliland would move from survival to acceleration — from a brave unrecognised polity to a regional economic hub linking the Red Sea, the Gulf, and East Africa. Security is where the transformation becomes irreversible. To join the Abraham Accords is to enter the U.S.–Israel security architecture. It sends a clear message to Al-Shabaab, hostile militias, and destabilising regional actors: Somaliland is no longer a grey zone. It is now under the strategic umbrella of the world’s most powerful military alliance. That is deterrence. It also reshapes the Horn of Africa itself. Ethiopia gains a stable, Western-aligned maritime partner. The Red Sea becomes anchored by a pro-Western corridor. The Gulf gains a reliable African gateway. And the United States secures its northern Indian Ocean flank without deploying another war. This is why the rumours matter. If President Cirro walks into the White House to sign the Abraham Accords, Somaliland will not just be joining a peace agreement — it will be joining history. For decades, Somaliland built a state without recognition. The Abraham Accords would recognise the state because it already exists. And in geopolitics, legitimacy does not come from sympathy. It comes from strategic necessity. If this happens, the Horn of Africa will never look the same again. Secretary Marco Rubio U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs Israel ישראל Israel ישראלiPM العربية عاجل Abdelfattah Elsisi Barak Ravid Anita Anand Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון Kjetil Tronvoll The Globe and Mail REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND

Habtamu Nini Abino

19,161 次观看 • 6 个月前

“China is the big prize. China will be the final goal of this whole regime change process which started after 9/11.” With this warning, Hussein Askary (Hussein Askary) of the Belt & Road Institute in Sweden frames today’s global tensions as part of a long-term Western strategy to preserve a fading unipolar order by suppressing the rise of a multipolar world led by China, Russia, and the Global South. Askary argues that Iran is now the central battleground in this struggle—not because of its nuclear program, but because of its pivotal role in the emerging economic and strategic architecture. Iran has entrenched itself in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, joined BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and expanded its regional influence despite decades of sanctions. These developments, he contends, cast Iran as a strategic threat to Western hegemony. He claims that the U.S., Britain, and Israel—backed by powerful intelligence networks and financial elites—have little interest in peace or stability in West Asia. Their strategy, he says, is to generate sustained instability in regions like the Middle East to block the rise of competing powers. While leaders like Netanyahu aim to eliminate regional rivals, Anglo-American strategists see Iran as the last remaining independent actor in what some Western planners label the “black curse.” The broader goal, according to Askary, is regime change in Iran, its fragmentation along ethnic lines, and a chain of destabilization extending through Pakistan, Central Asia, and Russia—culminating in an effort to contain or dismantle China’s global influence. Unless this agenda is stopped, Askary warns, it could spiral into global confrontation—even thermonuclear war.
2:33

“China is the big prize. China will be the final goal of this whole regime change process which started after 9/11.” With this warning, Hussein Askary (Hussein Askary) of the Belt & Road Institute in Sweden frames today’s global tensions as part of a long-term Western strategy to preserve a fading unipolar order by suppressing the rise of a multipolar world led by China, Russia, and the Global South. Askary argues that Iran is now the central battleground in this struggle—not because of its nuclear program, but because of its pivotal role in the emerging economic and strategic architecture. Iran has entrenched itself in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, joined BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and expanded its regional influence despite decades of sanctions. These developments, he contends, cast Iran as a strategic threat to Western hegemony. He claims that the U.S., Britain, and Israel—backed by powerful intelligence networks and financial elites—have little interest in peace or stability in West Asia. Their strategy, he says, is to generate sustained instability in regions like the Middle East to block the rise of competing powers. While leaders like Netanyahu aim to eliminate regional rivals, Anglo-American strategists see Iran as the last remaining independent actor in what some Western planners label the “black curse.” The broader goal, according to Askary, is regime change in Iran, its fragmentation along ethnic lines, and a chain of destabilization extending through Pakistan, Central Asia, and Russia—culminating in an effort to contain or dismantle China’s global influence. Unless this agenda is stopped, Askary warns, it could spiral into global confrontation—even thermonuclear war.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

212,755 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 UPDATE FLORIDA! VIDEO OF TEMPLE TERRACE CITY HALL OFFICIALLY HONORING MAGDA ELKADI SALEH - WHO THEN ASKED FOR A “PARTNERSHIP.” At the March 4, 2025 Temple Terrace City Council meeting, Mayor Andy Ross issued an official proclamation for “Ramadan and Muslim Heritage Month” - and publicly honored Magda Elkadi Saleh as an “esteemed leader.” Ross spotlighted her leadership across: ✅ Universal Academy of Florida ✅ American Youth Academy ✅ Bayaan Academy ✅ Radiant Hands (President since 2014) — described at the meeting as supporting refugees, families, housing, and resettlement assistance Then Saleh made the statement taxpayers cannot ignore: “We look forward to a partnership with the City.” 🚨 HERE’S WHAT CITY HALL DID NOT DISCLOSE: Magda Elkadi Saleh is not simply a school administrator. Public reporting has described her as part of a Muslim Brotherhood–linked multigenerational network that has spent decades building Islamic institutional infrastructure in America - and scaling it in Florida through schools, nonprofits, and national umbrella organizations. According to published reporting: 🔺 Her father, Ahmed Elkadi, was described as a top U.S. Muslim Brotherhood leader (General Mas’ul) 🔺 Her family lineage traces back to early Brotherhood figures in Egypt 🔺 Saleh herself has held national leadership roles within ISNA — the same institutional architecture federal prosecutors have tied to Brotherhood-linked networks in America This is a long-term institutional project — built through Islamic schools, taxpayer-funded voucher channels, and expanding parallel systems that operate under the banner of “community leadership.” Yet none of that context was provided to the public at City Hall. Only applause. Only praise. Only “partnership.” 🚨 Temple Terrace residents deserve answers NOW: ✅ "Muslims For Democracy and Fairness - MDF" helped get this proclamation - PAY ATTENTION FLORIDA - MDF is not just an Islamic community group - it’s a three-part political influence network (nonprofit, PAC, and lobbying entity) operating out of Temple Terrace to mobilize Muslim voting power and pressure elected officials in the Tampa region. Under the banner of fighting “Islamophobia,” MDF conducts candidate interviews, hosts political events, and builds pipelines of access and influence inside the Florida government. ✅ Who exactly vetted her background and institutional affiliations? ✅ Why is City Hall publicly legitimizing this network? ✅ What does “partnership with the City” actually mean- access, funding, programs, influence, or public resources? Mayor Ross needs to explain. Temple Terrace, FL Transparency is non-negotiable. See our full report:
6:41

🚨 UPDATE FLORIDA! VIDEO OF TEMPLE TERRACE CITY HALL OFFICIALLY HONORING MAGDA ELKADI SALEH - WHO THEN ASKED FOR A “PARTNERSHIP.” At the March 4, 2025 Temple Terrace City Council meeting, Mayor Andy Ross issued an official proclamation for “Ramadan and Muslim Heritage Month” - and publicly honored Magda Elkadi Saleh as an “esteemed leader.” Ross spotlighted her leadership across: ✅ Universal Academy of Florida ✅ American Youth Academy ✅ Bayaan Academy ✅ Radiant Hands (President since 2014) — described at the meeting as supporting refugees, families, housing, and resettlement assistance Then Saleh made the statement taxpayers cannot ignore: “We look forward to a partnership with the City.” 🚨 HERE’S WHAT CITY HALL DID NOT DISCLOSE: Magda Elkadi Saleh is not simply a school administrator. Public reporting has described her as part of a Muslim Brotherhood–linked multigenerational network that has spent decades building Islamic institutional infrastructure in America - and scaling it in Florida through schools, nonprofits, and national umbrella organizations. According to published reporting: 🔺 Her father, Ahmed Elkadi, was described as a top U.S. Muslim Brotherhood leader (General Mas’ul) 🔺 Her family lineage traces back to early Brotherhood figures in Egypt 🔺 Saleh herself has held national leadership roles within ISNA — the same institutional architecture federal prosecutors have tied to Brotherhood-linked networks in America This is a long-term institutional project — built through Islamic schools, taxpayer-funded voucher channels, and expanding parallel systems that operate under the banner of “community leadership.” Yet none of that context was provided to the public at City Hall. Only applause. Only praise. Only “partnership.” 🚨 Temple Terrace residents deserve answers NOW: ✅ "Muslims For Democracy and Fairness - MDF" helped get this proclamation - PAY ATTENTION FLORIDA - MDF is not just an Islamic community group - it’s a three-part political influence network (nonprofit, PAC, and lobbying entity) operating out of Temple Terrace to mobilize Muslim voting power and pressure elected officials in the Tampa region. Under the banner of fighting “Islamophobia,” MDF conducts candidate interviews, hosts political events, and builds pipelines of access and influence inside the Florida government. ✅ Who exactly vetted her background and institutional affiliations? ✅ Why is City Hall publicly legitimizing this network? ✅ What does “partnership with the City” actually mean- access, funding, programs, influence, or public resources? Mayor Ross needs to explain. Temple Terrace, FL Transparency is non-negotiable. See our full report:

Amy Mek

35,353 次观看 • 6 个月前

There is a lot of misinformation circulating about the missiles mentioned by the UK Defence Secretary and Cyprus, so let’s clarify what was ACTUALLY said. The UK Defence Secretary did NOT say Cyprus was the target. He stated that two Iranian missiles were fired in the direction of Cyprus, but clearly added: 👉 “We don’t believe they were targeted at Cyprus.” The point he was making was about regional risk, not a direct attack on Cyprus. Given the geography, Israel is extremely close to Cyprus. Missiles aimed toward Israel or military activity in that area can naturally pass through or near the wider Eastern Mediterranean airspace, which includes Cyprus. That proximity raises concern — but concern does not mean Cyprus was the intended target. In fact, the minister’s message was that Iran’s response appears wide-ranging and indiscriminate across the region, creating risks for nearby areas and military personnel, even when they are not the intended objective. So let’s be accurate: ✅ Missiles were detected heading in a direction that concerned the area. ❌ Cyprus was NOT confirmed as a target. ❌ There is no statement saying Iran attacked Cyprus. Accuracy matters, especially during tense regional events. Let’s share facts — not panic.
0:25

There is a lot of misinformation circulating about the missiles mentioned by the UK Defence Secretary and Cyprus, so let’s clarify what was ACTUALLY said. The UK Defence Secretary did NOT say Cyprus was the target. He stated that two Iranian missiles were fired in the direction of Cyprus, but clearly added: 👉 “We don’t believe they were targeted at Cyprus.” The point he was making was about regional risk, not a direct attack on Cyprus. Given the geography, Israel is extremely close to Cyprus. Missiles aimed toward Israel or military activity in that area can naturally pass through or near the wider Eastern Mediterranean airspace, which includes Cyprus. That proximity raises concern — but concern does not mean Cyprus was the intended target. In fact, the minister’s message was that Iran’s response appears wide-ranging and indiscriminate across the region, creating risks for nearby areas and military personnel, even when they are not the intended objective. So let’s be accurate: ✅ Missiles were detected heading in a direction that concerned the area. ❌ Cyprus was NOT confirmed as a target. ❌ There is no statement saying Iran attacked Cyprus. Accuracy matters, especially during tense regional events. Let’s share facts — not panic.

Andreas Demetriou

29,258 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸💥 In one of the most pathetic propaganda blunders in recent memory, the U.S. Embassy in Singapore released a 90-second video comparing China’s South China Sea claims… to cluttered HDB corridors. A serious geopolitical dispute was reduced to an awkward analogy about neighbours blocking hallway space with junk. 🗣️ The video claims: “This happens right outside Singapore’s doorstep too, in the South China Sea, where one neighbour thinks he owns basically everything.” From corridor clutter to claims of maritime aggression, the U.S. tried to manipulate local sentiment with a simplistic metaphor that fell completely flat. 📉 And Singaporeans weren’t buying it. The backlash was swift and brutal: 🗨️ “Don’t drag Singapore into your rivalry.” 🗨️ “Who funds this LC content, USAID?” 🗨️ “800+ U.S. military bases worldwide and China is the problem?” The embassy’s attempt to “localise” its anti-China narrative wasn’t just clumsy, it was insulting. A propaganda piece designed to provoke ended up exposing just how disconnected Washington is from the region’s mood. 🇨🇳 In contrast, China’s approach to the South China Sea has been measured, diplomatic and regionally focused: ✅ The area remains peaceful and is one of the busiest and safest maritime routes globally. ✅ China and ASEAN have made real progress, completing the third reading of the Code of Conduct. ✅ China firmly rejects the so-called arbitration ruling as “illegal and invalid”, a position rooted in international dialogue. ✅ Beijing continues to call for cooperation, mutual respect and regional harmony. At the UN, Ambassador Geng Shuang didn’t hold back: “The U.S. is not here to help. It’s here to provoke, divide and profit. While the world discussed maritime safety, the U.S. attacked and distorted.” 🔍 This episode wasn’t just embarrassing, it revealed the deeper pattern of American diplomacy in Asia: 🔻 Constant interference. 🔻 Outdated Cold War tactics. 🔻 And a habit of lecturing others while refusing to follow the same rules. 🎥 The U.S. wanted a clever, localised metaphor. What it delivered was a patronising, low-effort misfire that united viewers, not against China, but against them. 👇 So let’s ask the real questions: Who genuinely seeks stability and dialogue? Who respects ASEAN sovereignty and regional unity? And who’s producing cringe-worthy videos while stirring up conflict? The video is here:
1:37

🇺🇸💥 In one of the most pathetic propaganda blunders in recent memory, the U.S. Embassy in Singapore released a 90-second video comparing China’s South China Sea claims… to cluttered HDB corridors. A serious geopolitical dispute was reduced to an awkward analogy about neighbours blocking hallway space with junk. 🗣️ The video claims: “This happens right outside Singapore’s doorstep too, in the South China Sea, where one neighbour thinks he owns basically everything.” From corridor clutter to claims of maritime aggression, the U.S. tried to manipulate local sentiment with a simplistic metaphor that fell completely flat. 📉 And Singaporeans weren’t buying it. The backlash was swift and brutal: 🗨️ “Don’t drag Singapore into your rivalry.” 🗨️ “Who funds this LC content, USAID?” 🗨️ “800+ U.S. military bases worldwide and China is the problem?” The embassy’s attempt to “localise” its anti-China narrative wasn’t just clumsy, it was insulting. A propaganda piece designed to provoke ended up exposing just how disconnected Washington is from the region’s mood. 🇨🇳 In contrast, China’s approach to the South China Sea has been measured, diplomatic and regionally focused: ✅ The area remains peaceful and is one of the busiest and safest maritime routes globally. ✅ China and ASEAN have made real progress, completing the third reading of the Code of Conduct. ✅ China firmly rejects the so-called arbitration ruling as “illegal and invalid”, a position rooted in international dialogue. ✅ Beijing continues to call for cooperation, mutual respect and regional harmony. At the UN, Ambassador Geng Shuang didn’t hold back: “The U.S. is not here to help. It’s here to provoke, divide and profit. While the world discussed maritime safety, the U.S. attacked and distorted.” 🔍 This episode wasn’t just embarrassing, it revealed the deeper pattern of American diplomacy in Asia: 🔻 Constant interference. 🔻 Outdated Cold War tactics. 🔻 And a habit of lecturing others while refusing to follow the same rules. 🎥 The U.S. wanted a clever, localised metaphor. What it delivered was a patronising, low-effort misfire that united viewers, not against China, but against them. 👇 So let’s ask the real questions: Who genuinely seeks stability and dialogue? Who respects ASEAN sovereignty and regional unity? And who’s producing cringe-worthy videos while stirring up conflict? The video is here:

James Wood 武杰士

26,477 次观看 • 1 年前

▶️ NEW: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, invited U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham to Jerusalem this weekend to deliver an unambiguous case for military escalation across Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon — pressing maximalist Israeli positions that cut directly against President Trump’s efforts to secure peace and stabilize the region. The remarks come as Trump weighs competing paths ahead of a planned December 29 meeting with Netanyahu. Turkey’s foreign minister Hakan Fidan has warned of a “huge risk” that Trump’s Gaza peace could collapse without a “substantial” intervention with Netanyahu. But, after meetings with Israel’s prime minister, foreign minister, and defense minister, as well as senior IDF and Israeli intelligence officials and U.S. military leaders, Graham told reporters the following: ⸻ 🔴 On Gaza and Hamas “disarmament” “Hamas is not disarming. They’re rearming. They’re not interested in giving up power. They’re consolidating power.” “Phase two is an aspiration that cannot be achieved, in my view.” “Ninety days after the ceasefire, Hamas is stronger, not weaker.” “You cannot have a good outcome in Gaza with Hamas still armed. I don’t believe you can develop a part of Gaza if Hamas controls the other part.” “We need a plan quickly. Put Hamas on a time clock to disarm. If they don’t disarm, I would encourage President Trump to unleash Israel to finish off Hamas.” “It would be a long, brutal war, but necessary.” “There will never be peace in this region until Hamas is finished off militarily and politically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Iran “Iran is up to no good.” “We obliterated the Iranian nuclear facilities. We did not obliterate Iran’s desire to have a nuclear weapon.” “The regime hasn’t changed at all. They still want to destroy Israel and consider America the Great Satan.” “If there’s credible evidence they’re going back into the enrichment business at other sites, or rebuilding ballistic missiles that could threaten Israel or Europe, we should hit them before they can do that.” “Appeasement does not lead to peace.” “The only language radical Islam understands is force.” Later, when asked if Israel should strike Iran again: “Hit them as hard as you can, as often as you can. Make sure they can’t develop a nuclear weapon.” “If you see an effort to regenerate the enrichment program, hit it.” “If you see an effort to build more ballistic missiles … hit it NOW.” ⸻ 🔴 On Lebanon and Hezbollah “The trend lines in Lebanon are, quite frankly, optimistic.” “The Lebanese government has decided to call for Hezbollah to disarm.” “If Hezbollah gave up their heavy weapons, that would be a godsend for Lebanon and the region.” “If Hezbollah refuses, we should engage in military operations with Israel and the United States to achieve that goal.” “Hezbollah either gives up their heavy weapons voluntarily, or we come up with a military campaign to take them out.” “Once Hamas and Hezbollah are off the table, two proxies of Iran, the likelihood of a Saudi-Israel deal goes up dramatically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Turkey and a Gaza ‘stabilizing force’ “The idea that Turkey would be part of a stabilizing force would rock Israel to its core.” “There is no political support anywhere in Israel for Turkey being involved.” “Turkey’s comments against Israel are beyond the pale.” “If anybody thinks Turkey should be involved on the ground in Gaza, you would create a massive political crisis inside Israel.” ⸻ 🔴 On Israel, international criticism, and October 7 “Israel is not the problem. Hamas is the problem. Hezbollah is the problem. Iran is the problem.” “This is a war of television. You’re winning on the ground, but you’re losing in the air.” “The war aims are not genocide.” “October 7 was designed to stop normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel.” “If after October 7 Hamas is still standing, that would be the biggest mistake ever.” “You can’t rewrite history, but you can learn from it.”
17:54

▶️ NEW: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, invited U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham to Jerusalem this weekend to deliver an unambiguous case for military escalation across Gaza, Iran, and Lebanon — pressing maximalist Israeli positions that cut directly against President Trump’s efforts to secure peace and stabilize the region. The remarks come as Trump weighs competing paths ahead of a planned December 29 meeting with Netanyahu. Turkey’s foreign minister Hakan Fidan has warned of a “huge risk” that Trump’s Gaza peace could collapse without a “substantial” intervention with Netanyahu. But, after meetings with Israel’s prime minister, foreign minister, and defense minister, as well as senior IDF and Israeli intelligence officials and U.S. military leaders, Graham told reporters the following: ⸻ 🔴 On Gaza and Hamas “disarmament” “Hamas is not disarming. They’re rearming. They’re not interested in giving up power. They’re consolidating power.” “Phase two is an aspiration that cannot be achieved, in my view.” “Ninety days after the ceasefire, Hamas is stronger, not weaker.” “You cannot have a good outcome in Gaza with Hamas still armed. I don’t believe you can develop a part of Gaza if Hamas controls the other part.” “We need a plan quickly. Put Hamas on a time clock to disarm. If they don’t disarm, I would encourage President Trump to unleash Israel to finish off Hamas.” “It would be a long, brutal war, but necessary.” “There will never be peace in this region until Hamas is finished off militarily and politically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Iran “Iran is up to no good.” “We obliterated the Iranian nuclear facilities. We did not obliterate Iran’s desire to have a nuclear weapon.” “The regime hasn’t changed at all. They still want to destroy Israel and consider America the Great Satan.” “If there’s credible evidence they’re going back into the enrichment business at other sites, or rebuilding ballistic missiles that could threaten Israel or Europe, we should hit them before they can do that.” “Appeasement does not lead to peace.” “The only language radical Islam understands is force.” Later, when asked if Israel should strike Iran again: “Hit them as hard as you can, as often as you can. Make sure they can’t develop a nuclear weapon.” “If you see an effort to regenerate the enrichment program, hit it.” “If you see an effort to build more ballistic missiles … hit it NOW.” ⸻ 🔴 On Lebanon and Hezbollah “The trend lines in Lebanon are, quite frankly, optimistic.” “The Lebanese government has decided to call for Hezbollah to disarm.” “If Hezbollah gave up their heavy weapons, that would be a godsend for Lebanon and the region.” “If Hezbollah refuses, we should engage in military operations with Israel and the United States to achieve that goal.” “Hezbollah either gives up their heavy weapons voluntarily, or we come up with a military campaign to take them out.” “Once Hamas and Hezbollah are off the table, two proxies of Iran, the likelihood of a Saudi-Israel deal goes up dramatically.” ⸻ 🔴 On Turkey and a Gaza ‘stabilizing force’ “The idea that Turkey would be part of a stabilizing force would rock Israel to its core.” “There is no political support anywhere in Israel for Turkey being involved.” “Turkey’s comments against Israel are beyond the pale.” “If anybody thinks Turkey should be involved on the ground in Gaza, you would create a massive political crisis inside Israel.” ⸻ 🔴 On Israel, international criticism, and October 7 “Israel is not the problem. Hamas is the problem. Hezbollah is the problem. Iran is the problem.” “This is a war of television. You’re winning on the ground, but you’re losing in the air.” “The war aims are not genocide.” “October 7 was designed to stop normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel.” “If after October 7 Hamas is still standing, that would be the biggest mistake ever.” “You can’t rewrite history, but you can learn from it.”

Drop Site

203,583 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace
48:09

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace

Mario Nawfal

461,856 次观看 • 3 个月前