Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Twiggs’ testimony: Probable cause established. Period. It’s possible Lance is lying through his teeth. But this testimony, in conjunction with all of the other evidence, establishes probable cause without question. That said, listening to Lance testify, I am becoming even more convinced that he - and others - were...

50,994 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

HustleBitch

23,159 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

🚨Shocking: Is This Lance Twiggs At UVU On The Day Of Charlie Kirk's Assassination? It's A "Close Match" According To AI Facial Recognition. Hey everyone, I've been digging deep into the footage from the tragic UVU event on September 10, 2025, where conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated. In one of the crowd videos circulating online, I noticed a person who bears a striking resemblance to Lance Twiggs – the transgender individual known as the lover and roommate of accused shooter Tyler Robinson. For context: Lance Twiggs, 22, from St. George, Utah, lived with Tyler Robinson, and both were in my opinion involved in some way that day at UVU – though I want to be clear, there's no evidence suggesting either was the actual shooter. But here's where it gets interesting: it's believed that Tyler might be protecting Lance, given their close relationship and the mysterious disappearance of Twiggs shortly after the event. Using AI facial recognition tools, I compared the video stills to known photos of Lance. The results? A close match – not 100% definitive, but the facial structure (narrow jaw, high cheekbones, eye shape) lines up eerily well. The big curveball? The person in the video has long blond hair, while Lance is typically seen with shorter, darker hair. Could it be a dye job or even a wig to disguise identity? It's possible – people change looks all the time, especially in high-stakes situations. I'm putting this out there for the community: What do YOU think? Is this Lance Twiggs blending into the crowd at UVU, or just a doppelgänger? Drop your thoughts in the comments, share evidence if you've got it, and let's crowdsource the truth. We owe it to Charlie Kirk and everyone affected to question everything. Shoutout to NeVeReVeN for finding this discovery. Be sure to FOLLOW them.

Project Constitution

115,412 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce