Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Twiggs’ testimony: Probable cause established. Period. It’s possible Lance is lying through his teeth. But this testimony, in conjunction with all of the other evidence, establishes probable cause without question. That said, listening to Lance testify, I am becoming even more convinced that he - and others - were...

51,554 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

HustleBitch

23,159 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat