正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Twitch Streamer "Emiru" Facing VIEW-BOTTING Allegations: 8,000+ BOTS TURNED OFF After Raiding Smaller Streamer "YonnaJay" who was Extremely Disappointed. Raiding is a Twitch feature used to redirect a live audience to another channel at the end of a broadcast. "YonnaJay" was initially SURPRISED and happy with the retention, ....

1,961,097 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

40 条评论

WintyerLOL 的头像
WintyerLOL4 个月前

Thats typical ill join a raid but u less its someone i want to watch ill usaly instanly leave. Also more the half the users alos auto dont join raids. The fact you retain 50% of her raid is crazy good numbers

chumBucket 的头像
chumBucket4 个月前

Someone already corrected this perspective on Reddit

WintyerLOL 的头像
WintyerLOL4 个月前

There was not even 8k in the raid she kept like 1600 views thats huge te drop off happens after a hype bit this is pretty common its not enough evidence and finaly ultimatly even with direct wvidence twitch did nothing about ee they never do anything about a thorey

Kitsu 🦊 的头像
Kitsu 🦊4 个月前

Bots dont typically join raids. When I got hate botted, I tried to raid out and it showed my actual viewer number, not the inflated bot number. But viewers that come over from raids have been counted super weirdly for almost a year now. The viewers just „disappearing“ after a certain amount of time is pretty in line to what I have been seeing.

kaceytron 的头像
kaceytron4 个月前

It’s been so obvious that she bots.

Valon 的头像
Valon4 个月前

oh mizkif doesnt view bot guys! oh wait...

chumBucket 的头像
chumBucket4 个月前

I'm not affiliated with any of these streamers i already posted about mizkif allegedly viewbotting

🍋 Lemon Lime 🍋‍🟩 的头像
🍋 Lemon Lime 🍋‍🟩4 个月前

@Valoney_ I might have to make a 4th burner and start doing this. 300 bucks a year to spread hate seems like it should be easy enough

Valon 的头像
Valon4 个月前

@ChumBucketDrama 💀

eroyor king 的头像
eroyor king4 个月前

Well, bots don't sub. Emirus sub count is pretty consistently around 12k subs. Having an average of 4-5k viewer above that isn't really that strange.

DrewIsSharing 的头像
DrewIsSharing4 个月前

I’ve been raided by people who bot and this ain’t it. When you get raided by a botted stream you don’t get any of the viewers added to the view count, and on the off chance you do, it will last literally for one view count update and then immediately drop. The fact is 90% of viewers from one persons stream don’t usually want to watch who they raid

chicken hotpot 的头像
chicken hotpot4 个月前

Emi is our queen...she is a 30 year old teenager that can do no wrong in this galaxy..She is innocent..she doesn't know how the world works..She is also very very funny and cute...did I mention how cute she is? ..she needs to be protected from this cruel world

Layoff 的头像
Layoff4 个月前

You’re talking about 20 minutes where viewers from another stream stopped watching the person who was raided. It wasn’t even instant, it too like 15 minutes for it to drop 3K. You want to know who’s botting, look at the streamers view counts when they start up a stream. Instant spikes are a good indicator, not clips like this.

TroytheUnconquer 的头像
TroytheUnconquer4 个月前

Maybe yonnajay was just mad irritating

xy.ianni 的头像
xy.ianni4 个月前

typically, viewers leave after a raid. they can leave because of ads or just not liking the creator. not defending anything but this is honestly pretty normal, especially bc they don’t really know each other and they focus on different content

Mountain_Man 的头像
Mountain_Man4 个月前

Shroud raided me during a fundraising stream. Half the viewers left within 5 minutes, the majority left within 30. I think I only gained about 50 viewers after an hour, most likely because I was at the top of the category I was streaming. It's not rocket surgery.

Rakumei 的头像
Rakumei4 个月前

Guys...drop offs after raids are always massive. It's not the streamer they tuned in to watch.

blaskey 的头像
blaskey4 个月前

They left cause they didn’t want to watch her retarded garbage content

Nanocyde 的头像
Nanocyde4 个月前

That is fairly typical. There is probably about an 80% chance I will leave within 10 minutes of a raid. Reasons being tired, other fav streamer is on, didn't care for the content, etc...

LV🏴‍☠️ 的头像
LV🏴‍☠️4 个月前

Isnt it typical to join raid and leave a few minutes later to watch someone more entertaining? Audience has low attention span so you better be prepared to hook them up to good content if you get raided

Lokigar86 的头像
Lokigar864 个月前

I do participate in raids, but only for the points. I don't stick around.

Danielbri 的头像
Danielbri4 个月前

I see some twisting and mental gymnastics in the comments that i have to correct. The issue isn't that the viewers leave after the raid that's normal, but the fact ALL of the raid viewers left exactly at the same time 30 mn after the raid. That's not a natural and human behavior

Stache (troll arc) 的头像
Stache (troll arc)4 个月前

11.8k to 4k in 5 minutes She won't be beating the viewbotting allegations smh 😮‍💨

dylan 的头像
dylan4 个月前

Emiru raiding Esfand on March 23rd Lost 11k ccv in 10 minutes, this is egregious viewbotting

Getvivix 的头像
Getvivix4 个月前

At this point everyone is botting either by themselves or someone else so i wouldn’t get upset about it sure sucks but this is the platform they are in

Raikoh 的头像
Raikoh4 个月前

It's common knowledge emiru bots

USERMAN 的头像
USERMAN4 个月前

can literally see the time stamp right next to the view count😭 actually surprised she kept that many people who aren’t used to her content entertained for that long😭

ΛZRΛΞL 的头像
ΛZRΛΞL4 个月前

The retention rate of a raid is about 20% at best. People watch a streamer for a reason, why would the stick around after the streamer goes offline? Second, On twitchtracker you can easily see if someone viewbots by the huge ass spikes, yet there is none for Emiru.

mark 的头像
mark4 个月前

Literally 90% of viewers leave after a raid. They’re not robots, they wanted to watch a specific person not whatever is put on their screen. Surprised they stayed that long. Even yonna was surprised

MrStrange 的头像
MrStrange4 个月前

Most people usualy leave after someone has raided/hosted someone. Why..? Simple, it was the person raiding/hosting out they wanted to watch and not someone they maybe don't know. If it's someone they don't know then first few seconds and first impression is crucial.

NextLaunch 的头像
NextLaunch4 个月前

@Asmongold will have nothing negative to say about this “Oh ok guys like @emiru is my friend and like people will leave when you raid someone anyway look at this on X” . Dude is a jellyfish when it comes to anything negative about e girls he’s friends with because he’s dated many

Chris Waddle 的头像
Chris Waddle4 个月前

Emiru is obviously viewbotting..

JMazter 的头像
JMazter4 个月前

That's just what happens 15 minutes after the raid, you get one commercial break in there and then people decide if they want to keep watching someone they didn't click on.

NuclearWinter 🇺🇸 的头像
NuclearWinter 🇺🇸4 个月前

The cartoon women have figured it out. They know they have about 2 minutes to hook the raiders. So they immediately start talking about how the last stream was or talk shit.

Educating the Stupid 的头像
Educating the Stupid4 个月前

Is this going to be the next moron thing that Liekif uses to prove she is lying.

B8KED 的头像
B8KED4 个月前

Who the fuck actually watches these people? Loser ass irl bullshit streamers

LiterallyCheeks 的头像
LiterallyCheeks4 个月前

As someone who raids on a much smaller scale (80+ ppl typically), say I raid someone with 20 views, they only retain those extra views for a short time. Simple explanation is, the viewers simply don’t want to stay. Another thing? It could be something with twitch. Not saying these big streamers aren’t view botting but there are other factors at play

KatsMeow 的头像
KatsMeow4 个月前

I would say 20 minutes is a enough time for a vast majority to leave. People are there to watch Em and will leave. It's no big deal. No one is forced to stay.

folgender 的头像
folgender4 个月前

Hope you get sued for false claims and being paid by mizkif

Kimi🔞 的头像
Kimi🔞4 个月前

I can't say for sure if she has bots or not as I don't watch her. But this is normal during raids. People leave after raids because they're already satisfied with whoever they watched. Tired, or just not into the channel raided to. It's normal to have 8k raiders, and 1k staying.

相关视频

About a month ago, a clip of mine went viral⁽¹⁾ talking about the Current State of Twitch (3rd thumbnail in this tweet). It resonated w/ people outside my community, so lemme elaborate (as a 10yr+ Twitch Veteran). Current State of Twitch isn't great and haven't been for a while. I've been passionate about Twitch since inception (I joined in April 2011 in the JTV days, a few months before Twitch debuted in July 2011), and been trying to instill positive change but I'm only a cog in the machine compared to where influence can impact — likely via Amazon-appointed Executives to help "oversee things" at decade-old-acquisition-that-has-still-generated-zero-profit Twitch⁽²⁾. ------------------------------------------------ Twitch's Muddled Identity ------------------------------------------------ Describing Twitch 10 years ago was easy: "Youtube, except always live, for gamers". Now, it's more muddled & fluid, at best: "Always live broadcasters who aim to connect with their viewers and foster communities(?)" — that, in itself, isn't problematic; but how it's accomplished, what methods are most effective, and how certain directories accumulate higher viewership is, I think (I may elaborate further on that in a future tweet). The most common reactive bark I've heard following TwitchCon 2025 is "Ban Politics" or "Make it Gaming-Only Again!" — People forget, but Pokemon GO (June 2016) going worldwide-viral was the crack-in-the-dam that lead to IRL as a directory because of the impracticality of continuing Twitch's "games-only" era as the site was increasing in popularity, reach, and cultural significance. IRL was a band-aid solution for the core function of Directories⁽³⁾ (which was to let would-be-browsers make better-informed decisions on what to watch based on their interest). It's too broad and encompassing, which led to an unintended dopamine-producing⁽⁴⁾ psuedo-ChatRoulette where you "never know what you're gonna see" browsing there. Without a better tool to migrate users or aggregate topical content, this problem exacerbated continuously. Just Chatting was supposed to be the solution, as it came with 11-12 other directories⁽⁵⁾ to attemptedly split the IRL monolith, but failed to inspire Social Behavioral Change tremendously. Just Chatting is more popular than ever, discoverability — like in the broad, functional sense — is busted cuz every genre of content stuffed within it and fails to disincentivize streamers from opting-out of the most popular directory. So, how do you stand-out in the overcrowded field where a fuckton of the viewership goes for a Roulette Pull on something entertaining to watch? ... ------------------------------------------------ The Era of Clout-Farming Content (and the fact it works, ugh) ------------------------------------------------ Once IRL directory came in Sept 2016, so did the meta of skirting the ToS (Terms of Service) to maximize views or push the limits of what was tolerated on Twitch. Fundamentally, the social dynamic of receiving a suspension (everyone generally refers to them colloquially as "bans") earns notoriety and "free vacation/marketing", that when coinciding with a comeback event, open the possibility of a net-positive from the boost in viewership or metrics. This isn't as relevant now because the ToS Enforcement has gotten significant buffs to be more transparent and structural in the last half-decade. I can't speak on the nuance of this now, but "Full-Time IRL Streamers" and "Sweaty IRL Affiliates" were unbearable at TwitchCons until TC Policy cracked down on requiring consent by those they bumrush'd into (while live of course), so I assume they're probably equally as intrusive everywhere else ... then Kick came along in 2022 and dominated the headlines for mischief within this realm, for the most part; but that's a different topic altogether. The burden of an authentic collab can be too much friction, slow moving — and honestly, too much work for a streamer to do — compared to the efficacy of blowing up Streamer x Streamer Conflict via self-commentary-reacts for sensationalism and maximizing parasocial viewers' worst tendencies. Effectively, ragebaiting. I'm not advocating to abolish this as a policy. I'm pointing out how this is a very effective way to garner views within the social constructs — and it shouldn't be, nor always was. Something changed at some point. I don't wanna bore you with a timeline of the last decade of controversy on Twitch, so I'll fast-forward to when I definitively see evidence that Clout-Culture is failing upward: In March 2025, the unbanning of Adin Ross⁽⁶⁾ (on Twitch) I saw as a huge moral failure that reeks of desperation for his views/clout/relevance at the direct expense of the integrity of Twitch Culture. Not sure if that was a Clancy-specific decision or what, but it encompasses "neo-Twitch" or a disconnect if there ever was one. ------------------------------------------------ Twitch Culture is diluting at the expense of recouping revenue ------------------------------------------------ A decade ago, Twitch Plays Pokemon broke news across insular-livestreaming gossip and was celebrated as a pinnacle of internet fandom⁽⁷⁾ (Feb 2014). This event was a testament to the value of Twitch because it reinforced the undeniable power of CULTURE present in Twitch Chats. I don't think the event could've worked on a YouTube Livestream (remember YouTube Gaming, introduced in 2015?). There's a certain aura present in Twitch Chat that makes it feel captivating to interact and engage with compared to a YouTube Live Chat Box. One feels like a close relative of bot-spam'd yt comments and the other feels ... real. I think that value is the culture — what could keep Twitch afloat for a long time, even if YouTube were to hypothetically obsolete Twitch in every way for delivering live broadcasted video content. I've noticed that as the meta has shifted towards revenue-maxxx'ing with the proliferation of Spectacle Events, typically marathons, that are engineered to paywall as many things as possible, at the expense of the content. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but the culture has shifted. I also do think most of the marathon content isn't good; they're carried by being experiences with strong FOMO-factors to compel your participation by viewing. I do suspect there's a saturation point where the combination of the waning niches of livestreaming, 4th-wall-breaking, and manufactured spectacles can keep an audience seduced. Like, the content (in aspects) has less substance and I wonder what that means for the welfare of Twitch Culture and its content in another 5 years. Perhaps Twitch could foresee this and become proactive on the manner?... ------------------------------------------------ Twitch's Conduct & Repetitive Incompetence ------------------------------------------------ Twitch has prioritized generating revenue over addressing the needs of the already-active users for years. Emmett Shear (previous CEO; 2011-2023) probably was a huge reason for sluggish changes overall to the platform as from what I hear but I can't say for certain. Regardless, we got Dan Clancy as CEO and, while there has been lots of positive changes under his reign, it really does feel like "too little, too late" with the pressure looming from Amazon's 2015 acquisition; increased competition and marketshare decline; and declining revenues, active users & monthly streamers"⁽⁸⁾. Here's a brief timeline of features implemented that I feel helped build the culture. Before COVID, I believe the biggest obstacle was helping migrate streamers from being part-time to capable full-time content creators. So, at the time, revenue-generating products were revolutionary to help there, including me at that time: ✅ 2016 — Bits/Cheers & Prime Subs (!!!) ✅ 2017 — Gift Subs (to a specific user) ✅ 2018 — Gift Subs (to randos in Community); Super Subs & Ultra Subs ✅ 2018 — Twitch Mobile App v2 (original mobile app was a constantly broken mess) ✅ 2018 — Twitch Prime no longer adblocks (I will agree how they did it was stupid, but ultimately, it was a necessary; I can defend this in the replies if needed) Comparatively, here's the hostile changes that came at the expense of the Twitch Populous supporting said-change: ❌ 2017 — Communities⁽⁹⁾ (DOA cuz it wasn't streamlined enough and vulnerable to Popularity Bias; I can elaborate in replies if needed) ❌ 2018 — Tags for Channels (DOA cuz anyone can use any tag, diluting the effort of broad categorization or filtering in any capacity) ❌ 2022 — Twitch kills Hosting⁽¹⁰⁾ (also new "craptacular" Offline Page w/ Suggested Channels idea instead) ❌ 2024 — Twitch Mobile App v3⁽¹¹⁾ (Tiktok clone dogshit) ❌ 2024 — Stories (who asked for this?) ❌ 2025 — 100hr Video Storage Limit (going back against Collections & cementing Twitch isn't an evergreen platform; also SHORT NOTICE) ❌2025 — Live Rewind ... paywall'd to Twitch Turbo & Channel Subscribers only (this is free sitewide on yt's livestreams)⁽¹²⁾ ❌ 2025 — Ability to gift 1000 subs at once (already shelved from backlash) Post-COVID, I see a pattern of prioritizing revenue-generating products at the expense of what creators need or ask for. I understand Twitch needs to appease Amazon eventually with profit, but with a half-decade passed, all the buffs I can recall are 2K Resolution Streaming*, Portrait & Dual-Canvas Streaming*, and Stream Together / Shared Chat. *Both of these sortta don't count cuz they're invite-only betas that aren't site-wide and don't apply to non-Partners 🤷‍♂️ While more features arrive that ask for more of your money to partake in the Twitch Experience, I feel like the users (both Streamers & Viewers) continue to be neglected. 10 years ago, I thought YouTube Gaming was DOA; now I anticipate when more people bail on Twitch because the functionality will decay without a compelling reason to stay if the culture dminishes. I'll conclude with the 4th thumbnail included in this tweet — a supercut of a portion from the TwitchCon 2025 Keynote from Dan Clancy, with the youtube dislikes superimposed-over for your enjoyment. Let me know what you think of what I shared today! 🎉🥳 I'm considering also breaking down the specific causes (not symptoms) of why Twitch is where it is, and my 999 IQ Pragmatic Solutions that are tenfold better than what I've seen suggested after this morale fallout following TwitchCon 2025 👀

trihex

17,788 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dr Disrespect's full 20 minute response to Twitch ban allegations, rough summary: He's reapplying for YouTube monetization September 25th, will be streaming regardless In his Twitch lawsuit, all parties were not allowed to speak publicly, after lawsuit was resolved, settlement said no one could speak publicly, but if one side violated, he could respond Calls out ex Twitch employee Cody Conner’s for leaking the reported reason for 2020 ban Doc says there will be repercussions for accusing him, stating "you don’t know shit, you didn’t have any firsthand knowledge, you said I sexted a minor thru whisper messages” Talks legal definition of “sexting” Talks legal definition of “minor” Says user was over legal age of consent at time of messages Says he never intended to meet the user, they never made plans and never did meet Twitch’s trust and safety team admitted the messages weren’t sexting and acknowledged it didn’t constitute child sexual abuse material He says there was no exchange of sexually explicit images or messages He said he used the term "inappropriate" purposely in his initial response, but said it was "mutual bantering with inappropriate jokes" taken out of context Said twitch never had a legal analysis on whether his messages were even illegal Notes his ex Twitch partner manager never supported him and carried a grudge against him That same partner manager is involved with him getting banned supposedly Twitch user he was accused of inappropriately messaging said they didn’t want to report anything to Twitch, apparently user was encouraged by ex partner manager to report the situation to Twitch Same partner manager personally escalates the situation to Twitch Law Enforcement and Response team (LER) So they pull entirety of whisper messages, Doc says they “cherry pick and choose a few out of context excerpts from the messages” One hour later doc is suspended NCMEC was reported to for Docs messages, case was not escalated to law enforcement Twitch ban Doc, without legal analysis that his messages were even illegal Doc was banned without him or the alleged victim being interviewed A judge determined his messages weren’t illegal Says he’s 6’8 beautiful family and life Accuses other twitch streamers of bad acts but were never banned (someone using the n word repeatedly on stream was deemed not a breach of twitch policies, streamer was reported doing things with dead animals and discussing pdf* topics but given a multi million dollar contract, etc etc) Accuses Twitch of using this as a way to terminate his contract References two big streamers being signed to leave Twitch around this time, I'm assuming he is accusing Twitch of freeing up capital terminating Doc's contract to keep other big streamers from leaving as Ninja and Shroud left for Mixer? Says he has more just won’t disclose. These are all statements according to Dr Disrespect.

Jake Lucky🔜 GAMESCOM

3,557,907 次观看 • 2 年前

Muslim woman was forcibly made to get off the train at Jhansi station by a TTE at 3 AM. Mohammad Nadir (Mohd Nadir 🌾)'s mother, Hasma Begum, was traveling on May 15, 2026, from Lucknow to Mumbai by Pushpak Express (12533). She was traveling in the S1 coach with an acquaintance from her village. The person traveling with Hasma Begum had a valid ticket, but for some reason, Hasma Begum allegedly did not have a ticket. In such a situation, according to railway rules, the TTE could have issued a ticket by collecting a fine or taken legal action. However, it is alleged that instead of taking action as per the rules, the TTE forcibly pushed Hasma Begum off the train at Jhansi station at around 3 a.m. At that time, she was completely alone at the station and had no means to contact her family. After about three hours, she was able to contact her family with the help of another person, due to which the family remained extremely worried and frightened. Forcibly making a female passenger get down from the train at night in this manner raises serious questions regarding her safety. If there was a ticket-related issue, it could have been resolved under the established rules of the railway. After this incident, her son filed a complaint with the railway administration. However, it is alleged that the railway administration did not take any concrete action against the concerned TTE and the matter was closed after speaking to the complainant over the phone.

The Muslim Matter India

13,917 次观看 • 3 个月前