Twitter refs what do we think? 🤔

Called on the field as a int not enough to overturn. 100% a int

@BayouBammer I never saw an angle that showed the ball physically touch the ground. They overturned this on a hunch

Catch.

Georgia fan here and that was a pick, got away with one there

The ball is moving until he cradled it against the ground. It's not a catch.

“It bounces off his hands and into his chest I think this is an incomplete pass”

No angle shows the ball touching the ground. Call on the field must be upheld

INT

@BayouBammer Clear int , hands under the ball . No angle shows the ball roughing anything but his hands

100% not clear and obvious evidence to overturn

INDISPUTIBLE EVIDENCE OVERTURNED THIS PICK. My ass

1.)Called an int on the field. Never showed an angle where it CLEARLY hits the ground and not his wrist, yet the call is overturned. Obvious PI on UGA where a flag was thrown and the they proceeded to PICK IT UP. Does Bama still score after that? Nobody know.

About what, the ball bouncing between his chest and the grass?

The people in the replies are stupid AF You guys need to learn what qualifies as a catch Having your hands "under the ball" is not a catch IF THE BALL IS NOT SECURED. and you cannot use the force of your chest to the ground to secure a ball. Geez this is elementary

No catch

I think whatever they called on field should have stood

Not enough to overturn the original ruling of an interception. Bama was robbed.

Ball bounced off the ground. Duh!

It's time for the SEC to televise it's replay room live on these plays....

Ball never hit the ground. Was called int on the field. With evidence clearly showing ball never touched the ground, overturning the call was just one of 4 game changing mistakes of the night.

That was a pick

It may not have been an interception but the review had no business overturning it. There was not indisputable evidence. The game was rigged with so many things going Georgia's way by the refs.

@BayouBammer Anyone watching knows that’s an int. No camera view shows the ball hitting the ground

Fuck Bama, that’s what. They get every call, and have for 15 years. I don’t care!

The ball touched the ground. I hate it but it did

It was clearly an incompletion, and the defender did not catch the ball. You can see the back of the ball hit the ground.

That was an INT. Ball never touched the ground. You have to go with the call on the field.

Called a pick....looks like it bounced of his hands to his chest and secured it. If it was called incomplete it should stay. It was called an int and should stay. But there were other worse calls in this game.

Pick.

It's very straightforward. The call on the field was an INT. There was not a single angle definitively showing the ball hitting the ground. Call on the field stands.

mf interception

Never touched the ground

Important to remember it was called an interception. The camera angles here are close enough it could go either way. Should not be enough to overturn the call on the field.

Both hands under the ball, called interception nothing in video to overturn it!

I didn’t see an angle that hit the ground and I also don’t think it hit the ground. I think it hits his wrist into his chest and he rolls over with it.