Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two completely opposite narratives. One escalating war. Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi just dropped bombs in an exclusive interview: - “This is America’s war of choice on behalf of Israel.” - “No trust left. No real negotiations possible.” - “We didn’t start this. We fear no ground invasion. We are...

masuzafi's profile picture

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

103,261 subscribers

35,241 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP ON IRAN: “We have to open the Strait… We will give this one shot. I’m in no hurry.” “I would like to see a few people killed as opposed to a lot. We can do it either way.” “What we’ve done is amazing and we have decimated. Iran is decimated.” Trump is in complete control. Maximum pressure is crushing the regime. The Strait of Hormuz will be open. Iran gets NO nuclear weapons. No rush, no weakness — just strength.
0:36

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP ON IRAN: “We have to open the Strait… We will give this one shot. I’m in no hurry.” “I would like to see a few people killed as opposed to a lot. We can do it either way.” “What we’ve done is amazing and we have decimated. Iran is decimated.” Trump is in complete control. Maximum pressure is crushing the regime. The Strait of Hormuz will be open. Iran gets NO nuclear weapons. No rush, no weakness — just strength.

Gunther Eagleman™

43,128 views • 3 months ago

German Chancellor Merz on Iran War: The region must not slide into an eternal war with unclear goals. This war must be brought to an end with a clear plan, with a strategy. We are not participating in this war; we said that from day one. That remains the case for us. As long as the war continues, we will not participate in it with military means to ensure free navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. To this day, we are not aware of any concept as to how such an operation could succeed at all. The United States of America and Israel did not consult us before this war either. Regarding Iran, there has never been a joint decision on the 'whether.' Therefore, the question of how Germany will get involved militarily here does not arise. We will not do it.
2:29

German Chancellor Merz on Iran War: The region must not slide into an eternal war with unclear goals. This war must be brought to an end with a clear plan, with a strategy. We are not participating in this war; we said that from day one. That remains the case for us. As long as the war continues, we will not participate in it with military means to ensure free navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. To this day, we are not aware of any concept as to how such an operation could succeed at all. The United States of America and Israel did not consult us before this war either. Regarding Iran, there has never been a joint decision on the 'whether.' Therefore, the question of how Germany will get involved militarily here does not arise. We will not do it.

Clash Report

35,569 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | On India's position in the West Asia conflict, former R&AW Chief Vikram Sood, in an interview with ANI, says, "Israel is our friend. We have close ties; we are dependent on them for a lot of things which relate to our security... But this attack on Iran and the assassination or murder of the prior leader tantamounts to murder and a state taking the law into its own hands. This is followed up by Americans joining in the same thing in an undeclared war against a country... We won't say that Israel is not our friend, but we will say that this killing was unfortunate and could have been avoided. There is no other position we can take. We are dependent on the Strait (of Hormuz), not on Iran... We didn't bring it upon ourselves, nor did Iran bring it upon us. It was brought upon us because of the attacks by the Israelis and the Americans." Watch full interview here:
3:32

#WATCH | On India's position in the West Asia conflict, former R&AW Chief Vikram Sood, in an interview with ANI, says, "Israel is our friend. We have close ties; we are dependent on them for a lot of things which relate to our security... But this attack on Iran and the assassination or murder of the prior leader tantamounts to murder and a state taking the law into its own hands. This is followed up by Americans joining in the same thing in an undeclared war against a country... We won't say that Israel is not our friend, but we will say that this killing was unfortunate and could have been avoided. There is no other position we can take. We are dependent on the Strait (of Hormuz), not on Iran... We didn't bring it upon ourselves, nor did Iran bring it upon us. It was brought upon us because of the attacks by the Israelis and the Americans." Watch full interview here:

ANI

85,019 views • 5 months ago

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: The winner of this war is the Islamic Republic of Iran, which has emerged stronger from this war. A Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. has yet to be signed, changes are still possible. The agreement consists of two stages. The nuclear issue was not discussed in the first stage and we deferred it to the second stage. If the provisions of the MoU are not met, the final agreement will not be signed. The first thing mentioned in the agreement is that the US naval blockade be lifted. We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon alone, and the end of the war in Lebanon will include all fronts. The Strait of Hormuz is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. The future of the Strait of Hormuz will not be like the past, and our sword will always hang over the Strait. Iran and Oman will soon issue a joint statement on the management of the Strait of Hormuz. According to international law, it is not possible to collect tolls from the Strait of Hormuz, but service fees will be collected. Paying compensation to Iran is in plan.
1:41

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: The winner of this war is the Islamic Republic of Iran, which has emerged stronger from this war. A Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. has yet to be signed, changes are still possible. The agreement consists of two stages. The nuclear issue was not discussed in the first stage and we deferred it to the second stage. If the provisions of the MoU are not met, the final agreement will not be signed. The first thing mentioned in the agreement is that the US naval blockade be lifted. We will never leave Hezbollah in Lebanon alone, and the end of the war in Lebanon will include all fronts. The Strait of Hormuz is under the sovereignty of Iran and Oman. The future of the Strait of Hormuz will not be like the past, and our sword will always hang over the Strait. Iran and Oman will soon issue a joint statement on the management of the Strait of Hormuz. According to international law, it is not possible to collect tolls from the Strait of Hormuz, but service fees will be collected. Paying compensation to Iran is in plan.

Ariel Oseran أريئل أوسيران

134,043 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: IRAN FM ARAGHCHI: “Iran has shown that it will not submit to America's bullying, and we will by no means respond to the language of force, pressure, and threats. We neither fear threats nor bow to pressure, and we will not tolerate the language of threats. We have a principled policy and we continue to pursue it. Protecting the people of Iran and safeguarding Iran's interests in the Strait of Hormuz are among our principles, and we are pursuing them. As long as the legitimate objectives and demands of the Iranian people are not fulfilled, it is natural that we will continue on our path.”
4:39

WATCH: IRAN FM ARAGHCHI: “Iran has shown that it will not submit to America's bullying, and we will by no means respond to the language of force, pressure, and threats. We neither fear threats nor bow to pressure, and we will not tolerate the language of threats. We have a principled policy and we continue to pursue it. Protecting the people of Iran and safeguarding Iran's interests in the Strait of Hormuz are among our principles, and we are pursuing them. As long as the legitimate objectives and demands of the Iranian people are not fulfilled, it is natural that we will continue on our path.”

Sulaiman Ahmed

59,434 views • 1 month ago

🇵🇸🇮🇱 SENIOR HAMAS OFFICIAL: WE WANT TO FINISH THE WAR Reporter: "Do you feel safe in Doha?" Ghazi Hamad: "No, no one can be safe. Israel, I think that this is the country of terrorism, country of state, of horrific action, genocide. They want to kill and to prove that they are the super power in the Middle East. So, no one can give guarantees that Israel could not do it again here in Qatar or do it in other places. Israel is not interested in negotiations. I think we now have to reach our comprehensive deal. We want to finish the war." Source: CNN
1:46

🇵🇸🇮🇱 SENIOR HAMAS OFFICIAL: WE WANT TO FINISH THE WAR Reporter: "Do you feel safe in Doha?" Ghazi Hamad: "No, no one can be safe. Israel, I think that this is the country of terrorism, country of state, of horrific action, genocide. They want to kill and to prove that they are the super power in the Middle East. So, no one can give guarantees that Israel could not do it again here in Qatar or do it in other places. Israel is not interested in negotiations. I think we now have to reach our comprehensive deal. We want to finish the war." Source: CNN

Mario Nawfal

402,381 views • 11 months ago

Rubio: "Wars end generally in one of two ways: surrender by one side for another, or a negotiated settlement. We don't see surrender anytime in the near future by either side, and so only a negotiated settlement gives us the opportunity to end this war." The problem with this, Marco, is that you are pressuring the victim of aggression to compromise its statehood instead of pressuring the aggressor to end its conquest.
0:34

Rubio: "Wars end generally in one of two ways: surrender by one side for another, or a negotiated settlement. We don't see surrender anytime in the near future by either side, and so only a negotiated settlement gives us the opportunity to end this war." The problem with this, Marco, is that you are pressuring the victim of aggression to compromise its statehood instead of pressuring the aggressor to end its conquest.

Kate from Kharkiv

92,505 views • 8 months ago

US to Iranian Regime: “Give up your nuclear program, give up the enriched uranium, give up your ballistic missile program, stop funding proxies and terrorism, stop killing your citizens, and just be a normal decent country” Iranian Regime to US: “Let’s compromise. Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “We think you misunderstood. You cannot have nukes. No uranium. You must stop killing civilians. You must stop funding proxies, and you must open the Strait of Hormuz” Iranian Regime: “Ah, now we understand. Ok then, let’s negotiate. Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Listen, you either agree to our terms or we will have no choice but to strike again and all hell will break loose. You have 3 days.” Iranian Regime: “Fine. You’re twisting our arm. We know you won’t attack and if you do we will burn the whole region and humiliate you. But… we are willing to negotiate in good faith. So… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Enough. We are giving you one more last chance. Agree to our terms or else. No more chances. You have one week.” Iranian Regime: “We are prepared to negotiate and meet you half way. It has to be fair. So… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Stop playing games. This is serious. We will not give you any more chances. You have two weeks or all hell will break loose” Iranian Regime: “We accept to agree to negotiate where we can discuss your terms over the next 30 days. But… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” And round and round and round we go. Dear President Trump. There is only one way to negotiate with the Islamic regime or any Islamic terrorists. Just one way👇🏼 President Donald J. Trump Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
1:09

US to Iranian Regime: “Give up your nuclear program, give up the enriched uranium, give up your ballistic missile program, stop funding proxies and terrorism, stop killing your citizens, and just be a normal decent country” Iranian Regime to US: “Let’s compromise. Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “We think you misunderstood. You cannot have nukes. No uranium. You must stop killing civilians. You must stop funding proxies, and you must open the Strait of Hormuz” Iranian Regime: “Ah, now we understand. Ok then, let’s negotiate. Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Listen, you either agree to our terms or we will have no choice but to strike again and all hell will break loose. You have 3 days.” Iranian Regime: “Fine. You’re twisting our arm. We know you won’t attack and if you do we will burn the whole region and humiliate you. But… we are willing to negotiate in good faith. So… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Enough. We are giving you one more last chance. Agree to our terms or else. No more chances. You have one week.” Iranian Regime: “We are prepared to negotiate and meet you half way. It has to be fair. So… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” US: “Stop playing games. This is serious. We will not give you any more chances. You have two weeks or all hell will break loose” Iranian Regime: “We accept to agree to negotiate where we can discuss your terms over the next 30 days. But… Stop the war. Give us a lot of money. Release all our frozen assets. Commit to never attacking us again. And we have full control of the Strait of Hormuz. In return, we keep our nuclear program, we keep the uranium, we keep our missile program, we keep funding our proxies, we keep killing our people… oh, and death to Israel and death to America” And round and round and round we go. Dear President Trump. There is only one way to negotiate with the Islamic regime or any Islamic terrorists. Just one way👇🏼 President Donald J. Trump Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

Mor Edge Insight

29,686 views • 3 months ago

Susan Rice: "Before this war began, the world believed, rightfully so, that the United States was the greatest, most powerful military in the world. And here we join in a war with Israel, another extraordinarily competent military, against a middle-power adversary. And we have utterly failed to achieve our objectives ... We have, in effect, given Iran through this conflict another nuclear weapon in the form of its control of the Strait of Hormuz. And this is one they are prepared to use."
2:29

Susan Rice: "Before this war began, the world believed, rightfully so, that the United States was the greatest, most powerful military in the world. And here we join in a war with Israel, another extraordinarily competent military, against a middle-power adversary. And we have utterly failed to achieve our objectives ... We have, in effect, given Iran through this conflict another nuclear weapon in the form of its control of the Strait of Hormuz. And this is one they are prepared to use."

MeidasClips

24,719 views • 3 days ago

🚨The world would be catapulted into a GREAT DEPRESSION if US-Iran negotiations fail and result in a FOREVER WAR —Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. William J. Astore ‘I don’t think Iran trusts us at all. And I wouldn’t blame them. I don’t trust the news coming out of my own government. So why should Iran trust diplomats? We don’t even send diplomats. We send Trump’s son-in-law and we send a friend of Trump and a real estate developer. So we don’t even rely on the professionals within our own State Department. But I think Iran is being prudent. Iran recognises, I think, as sane people do, that diplomacy is better than a forever war where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people may end up dead. What’s so worrisome here is that we Americans, and our president…they all talk about short wars, they all talk about mission accomplished moments. ‘Oh yes, the war will be over in a few weeks, maybe a few months.’ We heard the same kind of rhetoric during the Vietnam War that, once we sent troops in 1965, that war would be over once American troops hit the ground. Well, that war stretched for another 10 years and we ended up losing that war. So this is always the rhetoric. And what I worry about the Iran war is that, yes, we’d like to think the war will be over soon, but we also thought the Russia-Ukraine war was going to be over in a matter of weeks or months and now it’s more than four years. I perish the thought that the Iran war could last a year or two or three. It would catapult the world into something like a Great Depression.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:07

🚨The world would be catapulted into a GREAT DEPRESSION if US-Iran negotiations fail and result in a FOREVER WAR —Retired US Air Force Lt. Col. William J. Astore ‘I don’t think Iran trusts us at all. And I wouldn’t blame them. I don’t trust the news coming out of my own government. So why should Iran trust diplomats? We don’t even send diplomats. We send Trump’s son-in-law and we send a friend of Trump and a real estate developer. So we don’t even rely on the professionals within our own State Department. But I think Iran is being prudent. Iran recognises, I think, as sane people do, that diplomacy is better than a forever war where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people may end up dead. What’s so worrisome here is that we Americans, and our president…they all talk about short wars, they all talk about mission accomplished moments. ‘Oh yes, the war will be over in a few weeks, maybe a few months.’ We heard the same kind of rhetoric during the Vietnam War that, once we sent troops in 1965, that war would be over once American troops hit the ground. Well, that war stretched for another 10 years and we ended up losing that war. So this is always the rhetoric. And what I worry about the Iran war is that, yes, we’d like to think the war will be over soon, but we also thought the Russia-Ukraine war was going to be over in a matter of weeks or months and now it’s more than four years. I perish the thought that the Iran war could last a year or two or three. It would catapult the world into something like a Great Depression.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

38,254 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇷 Iran’s FM Araghchi: After the war ends, we will design new mechanisms for the Strait of Hormuz / We will not allow our enemies to use this waterway Foreign Minister in an interview with Al Jazeera: - The Strait of Hormuz is a waterway located next to Iran. Naturally, we will not allow our enemy to use this waterway; meanwhile, there is a war ongoing around this waterway, and it is natural that many ships and countries are reluctant to use this route due to insecurity. - In my opinion, after the war ends, we must design new mechanisms for the Strait of Hormuz and the way ships pass through it, so that peaceful passage in this waterway is permanently guaranteed under specific regulations, taking into account the interests of Iran and the region. - I believe that after the war, the first step should be the formation of a new protocol for the Strait of Hormuz; naturally, this should be done among the countries on both sides of the strait because they are the main parties involved, and this protocol must ensure that safe passage through the strait occurs under specified conditions.
1:55

🇮🇷 Iran’s FM Araghchi: After the war ends, we will design new mechanisms for the Strait of Hormuz / We will not allow our enemies to use this waterway Foreign Minister in an interview with Al Jazeera: - The Strait of Hormuz is a waterway located next to Iran. Naturally, we will not allow our enemy to use this waterway; meanwhile, there is a war ongoing around this waterway, and it is natural that many ships and countries are reluctant to use this route due to insecurity. - In my opinion, after the war ends, we must design new mechanisms for the Strait of Hormuz and the way ships pass through it, so that peaceful passage in this waterway is permanently guaranteed under specific regulations, taking into account the interests of Iran and the region. - I believe that after the war, the first step should be the formation of a new protocol for the Strait of Hormuz; naturally, this should be done among the countries on both sides of the strait because they are the main parties involved, and this protocol must ensure that safe passage through the strait occurs under specified conditions.

Sprinter Press

25,984 views • 5 months ago

Foreign Minister of Germany Johann Wadephul: "The extensive destruction of ordinary residential areas in Kyiv is truly shocking. This is a war of terror that Putin is carrying out, as he is obviously trying to break the Ukrainian people's will to resist. We must not ignore this war, we must support Ukraine — because Putin's plan must not succeed. Over the past two weeks, we have necessarily focused heavily on the conflict with Iran. But this war [in Ukraine] continues, and we have just seen that Putin is using this situation to continue the war in this region. Resolving this conflict is a central task of German foreign policy and of European foreign policy. We either win together here, or we lose together."
1:20

Foreign Minister of Germany Johann Wadephul: "The extensive destruction of ordinary residential areas in Kyiv is truly shocking. This is a war of terror that Putin is carrying out, as he is obviously trying to break the Ukrainian people's will to resist. We must not ignore this war, we must support Ukraine — because Putin's plan must not succeed. Over the past two weeks, we have necessarily focused heavily on the conflict with Iran. But this war [in Ukraine] continues, and we have just seen that Putin is using this situation to continue the war in this region. Resolving this conflict is a central task of German foreign policy and of European foreign policy. We either win together here, or we lose together."

Anton Gerashchenko

52,440 views • 1 year ago

RUBIO: “I know this sounds fantastical, but it’s absolutely true.” “This is a regime led by people who believe that it is their calling and their purpose in life to usher in the end of the world.” “We had to act.” “We are going to get to the point where our military will have achieved all of its objectives in this mission.” “We can see the finish line.” “I think [this] will go down in history as one of the best run tactical military operations in modern times.”
2:02

RUBIO: “I know this sounds fantastical, but it’s absolutely true.” “This is a regime led by people who believe that it is their calling and their purpose in life to usher in the end of the world.” “We had to act.” “We are going to get to the point where our military will have achieved all of its objectives in this mission.” “We can see the finish line.” “I think [this] will go down in history as one of the best run tactical military operations in modern times.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

141,643 views • 5 months ago

‘Israel’s war on the Palestinians and Arabs is NO LONGER A JUST WAR, it will bring about the end of Zionism.’ —Former Chief of Israel’s Shin Bet Admiral Ami Ayalon ‘Our war with the Arabs and the Palestinians started since the beginning of the Zionism, at the end of the 19th century. What I claim is that we won this war. We won this war because in Beirut in 2002, all the Arab League members, they met and they reverse the three no’s of Khartoum, as a result of the Israeli victory in the Six Day War, they met in Khartoum and they come to decide on three no’s: No to recognition, no to negotiation, and no to peace with Israel. It took several years and in 2002 they met again in Beirut and they understand that what they're facing is a new region, new Middle East, a new reality. And they reverse and they decide on the three yes: yes to recognition, yes to conversation and negotiation, and yes to peace with Israel, on the conditions, on the parameters of the UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major victory and we refuse to see our victory...since they accepted our presence, our right to declare a Jewish state in the Middle East, what I claim is that since this moment our war is not a just war anymore. Because what we are fighting for, and we do not understand in Israel, is in order to expand our eastern border, to deny the creation of a Palestinian state and the Palestinian right to self-determination…this is the end of the Zionist dream. Because if we are not majority in our state, we do not have the power and we do not have the right to dictate the culture, the language, the symbols, the way we celebrate our holidays. So in a way we are fighting without understanding that this war will bring the end of Zionist concept.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:16

‘Israel’s war on the Palestinians and Arabs is NO LONGER A JUST WAR, it will bring about the end of Zionism.’ —Former Chief of Israel’s Shin Bet Admiral Ami Ayalon ‘Our war with the Arabs and the Palestinians started since the beginning of the Zionism, at the end of the 19th century. What I claim is that we won this war. We won this war because in Beirut in 2002, all the Arab League members, they met and they reverse the three no’s of Khartoum, as a result of the Israeli victory in the Six Day War, they met in Khartoum and they come to decide on three no’s: No to recognition, no to negotiation, and no to peace with Israel. It took several years and in 2002 they met again in Beirut and they understand that what they're facing is a new region, new Middle East, a new reality. And they reverse and they decide on the three yes: yes to recognition, yes to conversation and negotiation, and yes to peace with Israel, on the conditions, on the parameters of the UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major victory and we refuse to see our victory...since they accepted our presence, our right to declare a Jewish state in the Middle East, what I claim is that since this moment our war is not a just war anymore. Because what we are fighting for, and we do not understand in Israel, is in order to expand our eastern border, to deny the creation of a Palestinian state and the Palestinian right to self-determination…this is the end of the Zionist dream. Because if we are not majority in our state, we do not have the power and we do not have the right to dictate the culture, the language, the symbols, the way we celebrate our holidays. So in a way we are fighting without understanding that this war will bring the end of Zionist concept.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

65,335 views • 1 month ago

🇮🇷 JUST IN: Iran to continue its war with the US for 2+ years, until Trump's term ends in 2029. In a rare interview, IRGC senior adviser Mohammad Reza Naqdi outlined Iran’s war strategy. "The longer this war lasts, the more experience we gain." "We have also seen how the American military is weaker than what we perceived." "We have to attain deterrence so that the enemy never dares to attack us." “One way is to prolong this war until we get to the next term of the presidency and cause attrition.” "The number of missiles we manufacture every day is more than the number we launch." "Rest assured, even if this war lasts for years, until the last day, Iran's rockets will be launched." “If there comes a day when Iran has no more missiles left, that’s when we will be even more dangerous for America.” "The US has thousands of economic interests throughout the world, and all of them can be easily destroyed."
1:09

🇮🇷 JUST IN: Iran to continue its war with the US for 2+ years, until Trump's term ends in 2029. In a rare interview, IRGC senior adviser Mohammad Reza Naqdi outlined Iran’s war strategy. "The longer this war lasts, the more experience we gain." "We have also seen how the American military is weaker than what we perceived." "We have to attain deterrence so that the enemy never dares to attack us." “One way is to prolong this war until we get to the next term of the presidency and cause attrition.” "The number of missiles we manufacture every day is more than the number we launch." "Rest assured, even if this war lasts for years, until the last day, Iran's rockets will be launched." “If there comes a day when Iran has no more missiles left, that’s when we will be even more dangerous for America.” "The US has thousands of economic interests throughout the world, and all of them can be easily destroyed."

Coin Bureau

122,804 views • 20 days ago

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground
1:58

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

29,747 views • 6 months ago

"I told him [President Trump] that we are fully in line with Ukraine, that the sovereignty of this country must not be jeopardized." Chancellor Merz, in an interview with DW, said that Russia's war against Ukraine is a "deep threat for the entire political order of the European continent." "We are trying to figure out which part of this plan could be achieved unanimously between the Europeans, the Americans, and Ukraine on the one side, and the Russians on the other side. This is something we are trying to figure out, which is extremely complicated. But we have to move forward, and we have to come to an end of this terrible war," Friedrich Merz said.
1:52

"I told him [President Trump] that we are fully in line with Ukraine, that the sovereignty of this country must not be jeopardized." Chancellor Merz, in an interview with DW, said that Russia's war against Ukraine is a "deep threat for the entire political order of the European continent." "We are trying to figure out which part of this plan could be achieved unanimously between the Europeans, the Americans, and Ukraine on the one side, and the Russians on the other side. This is something we are trying to figure out, which is extremely complicated. But we have to move forward, and we have to come to an end of this terrible war," Friedrich Merz said.

Anton Gerashchenko

118,407 views • 9 months ago

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.
1:08

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.

Acyn

54,476 views • 5 months ago