Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Two cute guys (coreyfunk corey funk ) pee their pants three times between jumping in pools. #wetting #malewetting #maleomo #peepants #pisspants #wetpants #maleomorashi #gaypiss #malepiss #piss original:

MikeLikesPPants's profile picture

MikeLikesPPants

6,701 subscribers

30,348 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#wetting#malewetting#maleomo#peepants#pisspants#wetpants#maleomorashi#gaypiss#malepiss#piss
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bursting to pee in my grey pj pants. Barely started filming before I began wetting myself 😅😅 #peepants #wettingpants #omorashi #wetsocks #maledesperation #maleomo #maleomorashi #malewetting #peedesperation #gayomo #gayomorashi
1:02

Bursting to pee in my grey pj pants. Barely started filming before I began wetting myself 😅😅 #peepants #wettingpants #omorashi #wetsocks #maledesperation #maleomo #maleomorashi #malewetting #peedesperation #gayomo #gayomorashi

ShinyVolcarona

32,869 次观看 • 11 个月前

This woman’s son went to war and fought the Taliban in a firefight in Afghanistan. He returned home and was “kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed 9 times”, murdered in New York ON VIDEO DA Alvin Bragg dismissed the murder and gang assault charges She’s no longer a Democrat “I am a former Democrat who walked away from the plantation of the Democratic Party approximately four years ago after my son, Sergeant Hassan Karia, was killed. Hassan was an Afghanistan War retired veteran. He survived the battlefield of Kandahar. He received and returned enemy fire on the Taliban. To only come home to Harlem and be slaughtered in the street like an animal. Hassan was stabbed to death by four people he did not know, nor had he done them any harm. Hassan was kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed nine times. Hassan's father was also, you know, kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed 12 times by the same four individuals when he tried to come to Hassan's aid. Three of these people are siblings, two brothers and sister and their friend. They are all between the ages of 35 and 40 years old. So these are not children that we're talking about. These are full grown adults who know the difference between right and wrong. The three men involved in this case are career criminals. They have long histories that date back to their high school age, you know, teenagers.They don't have any education. They don't have any employment history or background. They have just been in and out of the criminal justice system, in and out of the penal system since they were teenagers. So the case was handled in Manhattan Criminal Court. All four were apprehended and charged with first degree gang assault and second degree murder because the entire homicide was captured on video. So there was no mistaken identity and there was no mistaken in any role that any of these four individuals played. The original district attorney prepared a strong trial ready murder case. But then in 2020 when district attorney Alvin Bragg took office or won the election here in Manhattan, he was handed that strong trial ready for murder and it immediately began to fall apart, wherein he completely dismissed murder and gang assault charges against two of the people that were involved in the murder.“ “You all have a wonderful day and Trump 2024” This is a longer video at about 9 minutes but I watched and listened to the entire thing, it’s very worth it. The Democrat Party is destroying this country.
9:36

This woman’s son went to war and fought the Taliban in a firefight in Afghanistan. He returned home and was “kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed 9 times”, murdered in New York ON VIDEO DA Alvin Bragg dismissed the murder and gang assault charges She’s no longer a Democrat “I am a former Democrat who walked away from the plantation of the Democratic Party approximately four years ago after my son, Sergeant Hassan Karia, was killed. Hassan was an Afghanistan War retired veteran. He survived the battlefield of Kandahar. He received and returned enemy fire on the Taliban. To only come home to Harlem and be slaughtered in the street like an animal. Hassan was stabbed to death by four people he did not know, nor had he done them any harm. Hassan was kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed nine times. Hassan's father was also, you know, kicked, punched, stomped, and stabbed 12 times by the same four individuals when he tried to come to Hassan's aid. Three of these people are siblings, two brothers and sister and their friend. They are all between the ages of 35 and 40 years old. So these are not children that we're talking about. These are full grown adults who know the difference between right and wrong. The three men involved in this case are career criminals. They have long histories that date back to their high school age, you know, teenagers.They don't have any education. They don't have any employment history or background. They have just been in and out of the criminal justice system, in and out of the penal system since they were teenagers. So the case was handled in Manhattan Criminal Court. All four were apprehended and charged with first degree gang assault and second degree murder because the entire homicide was captured on video. So there was no mistaken identity and there was no mistaken in any role that any of these four individuals played. The original district attorney prepared a strong trial ready murder case. But then in 2020 when district attorney Alvin Bragg took office or won the election here in Manhattan, he was handed that strong trial ready for murder and it immediately began to fall apart, wherein he completely dismissed murder and gang assault charges against two of the people that were involved in the murder.“ “You all have a wonderful day and Trump 2024” This is a longer video at about 9 minutes but I watched and listened to the entire thing, it’s very worth it. The Democrat Party is destroying this country.

Wall Street Apes

542,565 次观看 • 2 年前

LHP Ben Abeldt (TCU Baseball) is a name to follow closely this spring. Enjoyed a strong Freshman year in which he worked a 3.60 ERA with 71 Ks to 24 BB in 55 IP. Was dominant last spring and pitched his way to a 1.83 ERA with 54 Ks to just 16 BB across 44.1 IP. Two-time Team USA invitee. Standard pitchers' frame at 6-foot-3 and 210-pounds. Added noticeable strength and physicality to it between '23 and '24. Some natural funk and deception in his delivery. Uncomfortable look, especially for LHH. Works exclusively on the 1B side of the rubber which makes it even tougher for LHH. Long, loose arm stroke and attacks from a low-three quarter slot. Big time crossfire. Abeldt relies heavily on his fastball (threw it 79% of the time in '24) that sits in the 91-94 MPH range. Was up to 96 during the spring and up to 98 over the summer. Run and ride through the zone with particular life on his arm side. Like a lot of the low-release lefties who have a little giddy up on their heaters, it's generates the most whiffs when located on the inner-1/2 and/or top-1/2 of the zone. Does a nice job of staying off the barrel with it, 23% whiff and OBA of .208 last spring. Go-to secondary offering is his low-80s slider. Long, sweeping life with some late bite at times. Not to beat a dead horse, but just a brutal look for lefties; Abeldt will release the pitch from essentially behind their backs. Legit swing-and-miss pitch that's effective against both right and lefthanded hitters. 45% miss rate last spring, comfortably a 55. Closer to a 6 than a 55. Third pitch right now is a low-80s CH for which he's still gaining a feel. Gets good separation off his FB (averaged 10 MPH off) and does a nice job of killing spin. Natural fade to the arm side and will occasionally flash some tumbling life. Profiles as an effective option against RHH. Strike-throwing ability is above-average. The key for Abeldt this season is selling his ability to start. Has made just 2 starts in his collegiate career and could headline TCU's rotation in '25. Look for both the SL and CH usage (especially the SL) to tick up. Curious to see how he fares in more extended looks. Easy comp is former Miami LHP Rafe Schlesinger. 3rd-4th round type this July.
0:45

LHP Ben Abeldt (TCU Baseball) is a name to follow closely this spring. Enjoyed a strong Freshman year in which he worked a 3.60 ERA with 71 Ks to 24 BB in 55 IP. Was dominant last spring and pitched his way to a 1.83 ERA with 54 Ks to just 16 BB across 44.1 IP. Two-time Team USA invitee. Standard pitchers' frame at 6-foot-3 and 210-pounds. Added noticeable strength and physicality to it between '23 and '24. Some natural funk and deception in his delivery. Uncomfortable look, especially for LHH. Works exclusively on the 1B side of the rubber which makes it even tougher for LHH. Long, loose arm stroke and attacks from a low-three quarter slot. Big time crossfire. Abeldt relies heavily on his fastball (threw it 79% of the time in '24) that sits in the 91-94 MPH range. Was up to 96 during the spring and up to 98 over the summer. Run and ride through the zone with particular life on his arm side. Like a lot of the low-release lefties who have a little giddy up on their heaters, it's generates the most whiffs when located on the inner-1/2 and/or top-1/2 of the zone. Does a nice job of staying off the barrel with it, 23% whiff and OBA of .208 last spring. Go-to secondary offering is his low-80s slider. Long, sweeping life with some late bite at times. Not to beat a dead horse, but just a brutal look for lefties; Abeldt will release the pitch from essentially behind their backs. Legit swing-and-miss pitch that's effective against both right and lefthanded hitters. 45% miss rate last spring, comfortably a 55. Closer to a 6 than a 55. Third pitch right now is a low-80s CH for which he's still gaining a feel. Gets good separation off his FB (averaged 10 MPH off) and does a nice job of killing spin. Natural fade to the arm side and will occasionally flash some tumbling life. Profiles as an effective option against RHH. Strike-throwing ability is above-average. The key for Abeldt this season is selling his ability to start. Has made just 2 starts in his collegiate career and could headline TCU's rotation in '25. Look for both the SL and CH usage (especially the SL) to tick up. Curious to see how he fares in more extended looks. Easy comp is former Miami LHP Rafe Schlesinger. 3rd-4th round type this July.

Peter Flaherty III

27,890 次观看 • 1 年前

George Carlin Was An American Hero. Here Was His Last Message, He Died 1 Week Later “Sooner or later the people in this country are going to realize the government does not give a f*** about them. Government doesn't care about you or your children or your rights or your welfare or your safety. It simply doesn't give a f*** about you. It's interested in its own power, that's the only thing, keeping it and expanding it wherever possible. Personally, when it comes to rights, I think one of two things is true. I think either we have unlimited rights or we have no rights at all. Personally, I lean toward unlimited rights. I feel for instance I have the right to do anything I please. But, if I do something you don't like, I think you have the right to kill me. So where you gonna find a fairer fucking deal than that? Boy everyone in this country is always running around yammering about their fucking rights. I have a right, you have no right, we have a right, they don't have a right. Folks, I hate to spoil your fun, but there's no such thing as rights, okay? They're imaginary. We made them up. Like the boogeyman. The three little pigs, Pinocchio, Mother Goose, shit like that. Rights are an idea, they're just imaginary. They're a cute idea, cute. But that's all, cute and fictional. But if you think you do have rights, let me ask you this. Where do they come from? People say, well, they come from God, they're God-given rights. Oh, fuck, here we go again. Personally, folks, I believe that if your rights came from God, he would have given you the right to some food every day, and he would have given you the right to a roof over your head. God would have been looking out for you. God would have been looking out for you. But let's say it's true. Let's say God gave us these rights. Why would he give us a certain number of rights? The Bill of Rights in this country has ten stipulations, okay? Ten rights. And apparently God was doing sloppy work that week because we've had to amend the Bill of Rights an additional 17 times. So God forgot a couple of things like slavery just fucking slipped his mind. But let's say, let's say God gave us the original 10. He gave the British 13. The British Bill of Rights has 13 stipulations. The Germans have 29. The Belgians have 25. The Swedish have only six. And some people in the world have no rights at all. What kind of a fucking goddamn God-given deal is that? No rights at all? Why would God give different people in different countries different numbers of different rights? Boredom? Amusement? Bad arithmetic? Do we find out at long last after all this time that God is weak in math skills? Doesn't sound like divine planning to me. Sounds more like human planning. Sounds more like one group trying to control another group. In other words, business as usual in America. In 1942, there were 110,000 Japanese American citizens and good-standing, law-abiding people who were thrown into internment camps simply because their parents were born in the wrong country. That's all they did wrong. They had no right to a lawyer, no right to a fair trial, no right to a jury of their peers, no right to due process of any kind. The only right they had? Right this way! Into the internment camps. Just when these American citizens needed their rights the most, their government took them away. And rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of temporary privileges. And if you read the news even badly, you know that every year the list gets shorter and shorter and shorter. You see how it's going?”
3:58

George Carlin Was An American Hero. Here Was His Last Message, He Died 1 Week Later “Sooner or later the people in this country are going to realize the government does not give a f*** about them. Government doesn't care about you or your children or your rights or your welfare or your safety. It simply doesn't give a f*** about you. It's interested in its own power, that's the only thing, keeping it and expanding it wherever possible. Personally, when it comes to rights, I think one of two things is true. I think either we have unlimited rights or we have no rights at all. Personally, I lean toward unlimited rights. I feel for instance I have the right to do anything I please. But, if I do something you don't like, I think you have the right to kill me. So where you gonna find a fairer fucking deal than that? Boy everyone in this country is always running around yammering about their fucking rights. I have a right, you have no right, we have a right, they don't have a right. Folks, I hate to spoil your fun, but there's no such thing as rights, okay? They're imaginary. We made them up. Like the boogeyman. The three little pigs, Pinocchio, Mother Goose, shit like that. Rights are an idea, they're just imaginary. They're a cute idea, cute. But that's all, cute and fictional. But if you think you do have rights, let me ask you this. Where do they come from? People say, well, they come from God, they're God-given rights. Oh, fuck, here we go again. Personally, folks, I believe that if your rights came from God, he would have given you the right to some food every day, and he would have given you the right to a roof over your head. God would have been looking out for you. God would have been looking out for you. But let's say it's true. Let's say God gave us these rights. Why would he give us a certain number of rights? The Bill of Rights in this country has ten stipulations, okay? Ten rights. And apparently God was doing sloppy work that week because we've had to amend the Bill of Rights an additional 17 times. So God forgot a couple of things like slavery just fucking slipped his mind. But let's say, let's say God gave us the original 10. He gave the British 13. The British Bill of Rights has 13 stipulations. The Germans have 29. The Belgians have 25. The Swedish have only six. And some people in the world have no rights at all. What kind of a fucking goddamn God-given deal is that? No rights at all? Why would God give different people in different countries different numbers of different rights? Boredom? Amusement? Bad arithmetic? Do we find out at long last after all this time that God is weak in math skills? Doesn't sound like divine planning to me. Sounds more like human planning. Sounds more like one group trying to control another group. In other words, business as usual in America. In 1942, there were 110,000 Japanese American citizens and good-standing, law-abiding people who were thrown into internment camps simply because their parents were born in the wrong country. That's all they did wrong. They had no right to a lawyer, no right to a fair trial, no right to a jury of their peers, no right to due process of any kind. The only right they had? Right this way! Into the internment camps. Just when these American citizens needed their rights the most, their government took them away. And rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of temporary privileges. And if you read the news even badly, you know that every year the list gets shorter and shorter and shorter. You see how it's going?”

Wall Street Apes

1,121,582 次观看 • 3 年前

‼️🙏DOUBLE SCRIPT ➕ THE MANIPULATION BEHIND THE DEATH "MY JOURNEY OF SELF INVESTIGATION"🌸 💁‍♀️Right in the first post of "RED STAR NEWS", it is clear that the murder was staged - Papaprazzi reporter of "RED STAR NEWS" (No 2 time fall but 2 scenes in a staging.) 🙏➕➕ (I'm not sure whether the account "Red Star News" works for capitalists, the state, the party, or if they are truly just reporting news. A witness walking their dog and found, it was not correct. The first person to discover it was a janitor. And this issue is still in doubt.) ❗️The video and photo released on September 11 include: ( Happened and filmed after.) 1. A shadow inside YML's room, which was just the police investigating the scene + the iron window fully opened (a drunk person could not have opened that iron grille, it's very difficult to open). 2.Analysis (the photo of clothes - blue T-shirt, white long pants) 👕👖 - On September 11, reporters captured the scene of (1) blue T-shirt and white pants hanging out to dry, which matches the photo circulating online showing YML after the "second fall" and passing away. - Therefore, my observation is that the person lying there is indeed Yu Menglong (in my view, he died during torture, there was no suicide, he only died after the surgery to remove the USB. This is the first staged scene). (❗️The rumor they released in writing is true. The plan involved two time killings, "two time falls from the building", so indeed it happened twice.) Like two falls, two tortures, two stagings. The same thing, this is how the perpetrators want us to be messed up.) - Then, on September 11, there was a photo of (2) digging up the grass on the ground. Very strange. Previously said he was tortured, thrown there and still breathing. (That's a rumor.) ‼️👉Therefore, conversely, this is actually the final crime scene when they (the police) secretly took Yu Menglong away. - He was tortured to retrieve the USB, and the staged suicide was planned twice, which confused the paparazzi between real and fake. - He was murdered after brutal torture and thrown onto the "dug-up ground", with the staff there doing it to fabricate a fake crime scene. 👉 And based on reasoning about the final sequence of events: (unprocessed crime scene) 1. They placed his body below the 5th floor and claimed it was a suicide. It was a staged scene. The police must have taken photos at the actual crime scene. There will always be an original, untouched crime scene. 2. He was lying on the dug-up ground and secretly taken away by the police, after which the police concluded it was a fall, a slip, or an accident… without any video recording. 👉 the possibility of number 2 is higher, because they conclude quickly. When Yu Menglong's body is no longer intact. While at the crime scene, there were also two characters sitting near the police, Jin Quang and Xin Qi or (Cheng) ‼️️ 👉This is definitely a murder attempt in which the police are the ones who hide the crime. If you want the community to stop analyzing and speculating, show us the conclusion of the case. There is no infor autopsy, what else? (✅) THANK YOU "RED STAR NEWS"🙂 Note: Analysis based on the video of red star news on September 11 at the scene. Note: Refer to the timeline below. 👇 ❗️In short: I mean that some things have been messed up by some, but in general it still follows a certain direction and a result. - Torture - take usb - murder -> Staging, staging 2 times (pull the body to the scene) 👉 Anyway, it still only comes to one result. ( Analysis of : 미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼 Remember to write the source when take it out ) #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧
1:10

‼️🙏DOUBLE SCRIPT ➕ THE MANIPULATION BEHIND THE DEATH "MY JOURNEY OF SELF INVESTIGATION"🌸 💁‍♀️Right in the first post of "RED STAR NEWS", it is clear that the murder was staged - Papaprazzi reporter of "RED STAR NEWS" (No 2 time fall but 2 scenes in a staging.) 🙏➕➕ (I'm not sure whether the account "Red Star News" works for capitalists, the state, the party, or if they are truly just reporting news. A witness walking their dog and found, it was not correct. The first person to discover it was a janitor. And this issue is still in doubt.) ❗️The video and photo released on September 11 include: ( Happened and filmed after.) 1. A shadow inside YML's room, which was just the police investigating the scene + the iron window fully opened (a drunk person could not have opened that iron grille, it's very difficult to open). 2.Analysis (the photo of clothes - blue T-shirt, white long pants) 👕👖 - On September 11, reporters captured the scene of (1) blue T-shirt and white pants hanging out to dry, which matches the photo circulating online showing YML after the "second fall" and passing away. - Therefore, my observation is that the person lying there is indeed Yu Menglong (in my view, he died during torture, there was no suicide, he only died after the surgery to remove the USB. This is the first staged scene). (❗️The rumor they released in writing is true. The plan involved two time killings, "two time falls from the building", so indeed it happened twice.) Like two falls, two tortures, two stagings. The same thing, this is how the perpetrators want us to be messed up.) - Then, on September 11, there was a photo of (2) digging up the grass on the ground. Very strange. Previously said he was tortured, thrown there and still breathing. (That's a rumor.) ‼️👉Therefore, conversely, this is actually the final crime scene when they (the police) secretly took Yu Menglong away. - He was tortured to retrieve the USB, and the staged suicide was planned twice, which confused the paparazzi between real and fake. - He was murdered after brutal torture and thrown onto the "dug-up ground", with the staff there doing it to fabricate a fake crime scene. 👉 And based on reasoning about the final sequence of events: (unprocessed crime scene) 1. They placed his body below the 5th floor and claimed it was a suicide. It was a staged scene. The police must have taken photos at the actual crime scene. There will always be an original, untouched crime scene. 2. He was lying on the dug-up ground and secretly taken away by the police, after which the police concluded it was a fall, a slip, or an accident… without any video recording. 👉 the possibility of number 2 is higher, because they conclude quickly. When Yu Menglong's body is no longer intact. While at the crime scene, there were also two characters sitting near the police, Jin Quang and Xin Qi or (Cheng) ‼️️ 👉This is definitely a murder attempt in which the police are the ones who hide the crime. If you want the community to stop analyzing and speculating, show us the conclusion of the case. There is no infor autopsy, what else? (✅) THANK YOU "RED STAR NEWS"🙂 Note: Analysis based on the video of red star news on September 11 at the scene. Note: Refer to the timeline below. 👇 ❗️In short: I mean that some things have been messed up by some, but in general it still follows a certain direction and a result. - Torture - take usb - murder -> Staging, staging 2 times (pull the body to the scene) 👉 Anyway, it still only comes to one result. ( Analysis of : 미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼 Remember to write the source when take it out ) #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧

미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼

129,573 次观看 • 1 年前

Biological males dominate women's college volleyball game in Ontario South of the border, thanks to U.S. President Donald Trump taking office again, the war on wokeism has begun in earnest. Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are being jettisoned at government departments and the military in favour of a meritocracy. Meanwhile, President Trump has declared that there are only two genders. Shockers! Such common sense statements make for a breath of fresh air. But alas, common sense would appear to be very uncommon in our great dominion. Indeed, in 2025, transanity – that intersection where transgenderism and insanity collide – continues unabated. Case in point, last Wednesday, the Toronto-based Centennial Colts visited Algonquin College in Barrie, Ont., to take on the Grizzlies in female varsity volleyball. Well, not entirely female. You see, the Colts still have a couple of players on the roster who are men that “identify” as women. That would be #13, Jaque Ronquillo, and #16, C.L. Viloria. Indeed, it was déjà vu all over for us. That’s because last year we took in a series of games between the Colts and the Seneca Sting. The Sting boasted three men on its roster. That’s right, there was a total of FIVE men on the court that night who were pretending to be women! For those keeping score at home, Seneca won the series. The Colts were literally outmanned on this night… But in Barrie, it was the Colts who swept the Grizzlies on this night. Alas, all of Algonquin’s players are female. They didn’t have a chance, and so it was that the Grizzlies further fell in the overall standings with a record of two wins and 15 losses. The games were hard to watch at times. Centennial’s Ronquillo and Viloria were clearly the dominant players on the court – especially when it came to spiking the ball. If anything, it made for a textbook lesson in Biology 101. Still, cheating is one thing. But the inclusion of men is also a safety issue. Viloria has reportedly attacked the ball with such heavy force that in previous games female opponents have endured concussions. But hey… diversity. It’s disgraceful. But when it comes to the woke Ontario College Athletic Association, the OCAA is perfectly fine with men who identify as women. It’s a celebration of inclusiveness or something … even though women’s sports are being destroyed in front of our eyes. After the match, Rebel News wanted to interview the gender-bender grifters as well as the real female players. But get this: we were continually harassed and our cameras were blocked. And this was being done by Georgian College staffers! Apparently, they too think that radical transgenderism is a good thing – even when their own female athletes are getting slaughtered on the court! Predictably, for the crime of asking insensitive questions, we were frog-marched off the premises by security guards. The free press was censored as Ronquillo and Viloria showered in the female changeroom! Maybe we should’ve called the cops regarding this perversion on campus? But really, in Justin Trudeau’s Canada, what’s the point? It's all so sad, really. The motto of the Algonquin Grizzlies is “Own the den.” But on this night, the den was surrendered to male invaders. And speaking of bruins, just where the hell is Mama and Papa Bear? Why are the parents sitting in the stands and casually watching such a grotesque spectacle? Why are they perfectly ok with seeing their daughters brutalized in such a fashion? In the final analysis, this transanity garbage ends tomorrow if the female players en masse refuse to play. But for some reason, they refuse to reclaim their sport. Why? Are they so indoctrinated that they actually subscribe to the falsehood that “transwomen are real women”? Are they afraid of being labeled as “transphobes”? It’s baffling. Rebel News will continue to expose transanity on the courts, in the playing fields, and in the swimming pools. But that’s all we can do: chronicle this disgusting trend. When it comes to actual tangible change, this is in the hands of the real female athletes. Unless, that is, they are perfectly fine with male losers who can’t make the men’s team – and instead, poach positions on the women’s team that rightfully belong to real women. REPORT by David Menzies:
11:47

Biological males dominate women's college volleyball game in Ontario South of the border, thanks to U.S. President Donald Trump taking office again, the war on wokeism has begun in earnest. Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are being jettisoned at government departments and the military in favour of a meritocracy. Meanwhile, President Trump has declared that there are only two genders. Shockers! Such common sense statements make for a breath of fresh air. But alas, common sense would appear to be very uncommon in our great dominion. Indeed, in 2025, transanity – that intersection where transgenderism and insanity collide – continues unabated. Case in point, last Wednesday, the Toronto-based Centennial Colts visited Algonquin College in Barrie, Ont., to take on the Grizzlies in female varsity volleyball. Well, not entirely female. You see, the Colts still have a couple of players on the roster who are men that “identify” as women. That would be #13, Jaque Ronquillo, and #16, C.L. Viloria. Indeed, it was déjà vu all over for us. That’s because last year we took in a series of games between the Colts and the Seneca Sting. The Sting boasted three men on its roster. That’s right, there was a total of FIVE men on the court that night who were pretending to be women! For those keeping score at home, Seneca won the series. The Colts were literally outmanned on this night… But in Barrie, it was the Colts who swept the Grizzlies on this night. Alas, all of Algonquin’s players are female. They didn’t have a chance, and so it was that the Grizzlies further fell in the overall standings with a record of two wins and 15 losses. The games were hard to watch at times. Centennial’s Ronquillo and Viloria were clearly the dominant players on the court – especially when it came to spiking the ball. If anything, it made for a textbook lesson in Biology 101. Still, cheating is one thing. But the inclusion of men is also a safety issue. Viloria has reportedly attacked the ball with such heavy force that in previous games female opponents have endured concussions. But hey… diversity. It’s disgraceful. But when it comes to the woke Ontario College Athletic Association, the OCAA is perfectly fine with men who identify as women. It’s a celebration of inclusiveness or something … even though women’s sports are being destroyed in front of our eyes. After the match, Rebel News wanted to interview the gender-bender grifters as well as the real female players. But get this: we were continually harassed and our cameras were blocked. And this was being done by Georgian College staffers! Apparently, they too think that radical transgenderism is a good thing – even when their own female athletes are getting slaughtered on the court! Predictably, for the crime of asking insensitive questions, we were frog-marched off the premises by security guards. The free press was censored as Ronquillo and Viloria showered in the female changeroom! Maybe we should’ve called the cops regarding this perversion on campus? But really, in Justin Trudeau’s Canada, what’s the point? It's all so sad, really. The motto of the Algonquin Grizzlies is “Own the den.” But on this night, the den was surrendered to male invaders. And speaking of bruins, just where the hell is Mama and Papa Bear? Why are the parents sitting in the stands and casually watching such a grotesque spectacle? Why are they perfectly ok with seeing their daughters brutalized in such a fashion? In the final analysis, this transanity garbage ends tomorrow if the female players en masse refuse to play. But for some reason, they refuse to reclaim their sport. Why? Are they so indoctrinated that they actually subscribe to the falsehood that “transwomen are real women”? Are they afraid of being labeled as “transphobes”? It’s baffling. Rebel News will continue to expose transanity on the courts, in the playing fields, and in the swimming pools. But that’s all we can do: chronicle this disgusting trend. When it comes to actual tangible change, this is in the hands of the real female athletes. Unless, that is, they are perfectly fine with male losers who can’t make the men’s team – and instead, poach positions on the women’s team that rightfully belong to real women. REPORT by David Menzies:

Rebel News

18,434 次观看 • 1 年前

Poland is extraordinary, and I decided to add some information to a video, adding insight, information, and little-known facts. I love Polish history, culture, people, food, and especially their attitudes and loyal friendships. Some people don't like Polish, probably because they don't know them - some people don't like me because I like Polish. People should have more self-reflection instead of so much hate for other people. This behavior is a human problem, and it affects too many people. Perhaps one day, instead of finding the bad in everyone, we could find the good. I find so many positive attributes in the Polish people, and that's why I advocate for them and talk about their astonishing history because I believe more people should know. First, Poland should not exist historically. Germany and Russia have been trying to eat it up for centuries. Poland is the bloodlands of Europe, sitting in between these two monsters. It did not exist for 123 years, but the people although, split between three nations – Austria as well was meant to be obliterated, and the people assimilated, they kept their culture together and came back alive in 1919, just in time to save Europe from Bolshevism. The Reds were invading and bringing this deadly virus into Europe, but the Poles stopped them just in time. Perhaps without them, you may be in a labor camp right now? I bet you didn't know that? This salvation was not the first time the Polish saved European civilization, In 1683, Vienna was under siege by the Turks; right on the cusp of breaching the city, making their way into Europe, ripe for spreading Islam, the Polish saved the day. This time an army led by King Jan Sobieski and his winged hussar cavalry routs the army – this ends the long years of encroachment into Europe. A little more information. Poles seem everywhere; this time, a cavalryman named Pulaski and an engineer Kosciusko traveled to America to help Washington. Pulaski saved Washington from sure death or capture when encircled at Brandywine. Pulaski's title is the father of the American cavalry. Kosciusko's engineering was crucial to the victory of turning the tide at the battle of Saratoga; He made it possible for the Americans to make a successful retreat. Perhaps without these two Poles, there would be no United States. This is not an exaggeration. Individuals and individual decisions often make history. Just think of that today if not for Steve Jobs or Thomas Edison, or Tesla; we may not be watching this. Many of us are more familiar with World War II, though Poland is the least appreciated and most manipulated nation from that era. The war began because of the invasion of Poland by the Germans, and most people don't know that the Soviets invaded Poland 16 days later, yet they would be considered our allies - they were no better and, in fact, casualty-wise, worse. The Soviets murdered 22 thousand Polish officers at Katyn, and between 1937 -1938, over 100 thousand Poles died in a Soviet genocide. Many Russians themselves were victims. The problem is that our Western intellectuals have been promoting this ideology. Many of these horrific crimes have been covered up, and much of it is. Like 100 million dead from communism isn't enough, will it work next time? Unlike what you hear, the Polish actually fought quite hard against the Germans, but they couldn't do that for long because they were attacked on two flanks. Some of the Polish armies were capable of escaping, and the Polish army in exile made up the fourth-largest allied army. The Polish had an underground army with more than the French resistance you always hear about. Still, the Polish didn't get to sit at the winner's table as the French, although the French even had a collaborative government. Poland never surrendered to the invaders and fought from the first to the last day of the war. There were cooperating governments in many other countries but not in Poland. The Polish underground army was a phenomenon on a worldwide and historical scale. They had a 650,000-man army - 400,000 AK soldiers and 250,000 volunteers fighting alongside the Allies in the West. Without them, the war may have been very different, and this is beyond doubt for Polish pilots that came to the rescue of the British pilots when they most needed them. The Battle of Britain was pivotal, and we know that the Polish pilots were game-changers. Indeed, even more, the Poles were the ones the broke the Enigma code, which deciphered German secrets. Imagine what may have happened without these geniuses? These are just a few of the many ways the Polish played a role in World War II, but how often do you hear about them? Maybe their inability to march in the victory parade in London would foretell some of why. Even though the war was won and the Polish came to their rescue, the British didn't want to offend the Communist Stalin, to whom they gave Poland after the war. The Polish were betrayed at the start of the war and would be betrayed at the end. No real liberation would come until 1989, and still, to this day; they are betrayed by dishonest historians, who we call neo-Stalinists, intent on defaming the Polish after all they have been through. This is why it is vital to check out your reading to ensure it is factual and not manipulated. Today, this history is being abused for various agendas, including one that involves a lot of money. When this is at stake, so-called historians will work hand in hand with those who want that money. We all know what money does. The country has been invaded or has fought for freedom in insurrections over 40 times. Poland adopted its first written constitution in the spring of 1791, which was the 2nd in the world valid legal document of the kind. The Old Town that you can see in Warsaw isn't the actual Old Town from before the war. The original was bombed entirely in the 40s, and Poles rebuilt it after the war using Bernardo Bellotto's detailed paintings. It now looks as it did in the 18th century rather than the 20th. Marie Curie, who discovered Polon and Rad, wasn't French but Polish. Her name was Marie Sklodowska before she married a Frenchman named Pierre Curie. She was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, the first and only woman to win twice, and the only person to win a Nobel Prize in two different sciences. Joseph Conrad was actually Polish too. Poland has the second oldest university in the whole of Europe - Jagiellonian University, founded by King Casimir III the Great in the year 1364. The most famous astronomer in the world was from Poland. Nicolaus Copernicus was also a Renaissance mathematician. There have been 17 different Nobel Prize winners from Poland. This speech is just the tip of the iceberg for Polish history. There is much more to explore – I challenge you to start your journey. Thanks for viewing!🙏
6:22

Poland is extraordinary, and I decided to add some information to a video, adding insight, information, and little-known facts. I love Polish history, culture, people, food, and especially their attitudes and loyal friendships. Some people don't like Polish, probably because they don't know them - some people don't like me because I like Polish. People should have more self-reflection instead of so much hate for other people. This behavior is a human problem, and it affects too many people. Perhaps one day, instead of finding the bad in everyone, we could find the good. I find so many positive attributes in the Polish people, and that's why I advocate for them and talk about their astonishing history because I believe more people should know. First, Poland should not exist historically. Germany and Russia have been trying to eat it up for centuries. Poland is the bloodlands of Europe, sitting in between these two monsters. It did not exist for 123 years, but the people although, split between three nations – Austria as well was meant to be obliterated, and the people assimilated, they kept their culture together and came back alive in 1919, just in time to save Europe from Bolshevism. The Reds were invading and bringing this deadly virus into Europe, but the Poles stopped them just in time. Perhaps without them, you may be in a labor camp right now? I bet you didn't know that? This salvation was not the first time the Polish saved European civilization, In 1683, Vienna was under siege by the Turks; right on the cusp of breaching the city, making their way into Europe, ripe for spreading Islam, the Polish saved the day. This time an army led by King Jan Sobieski and his winged hussar cavalry routs the army – this ends the long years of encroachment into Europe. A little more information. Poles seem everywhere; this time, a cavalryman named Pulaski and an engineer Kosciusko traveled to America to help Washington. Pulaski saved Washington from sure death or capture when encircled at Brandywine. Pulaski's title is the father of the American cavalry. Kosciusko's engineering was crucial to the victory of turning the tide at the battle of Saratoga; He made it possible for the Americans to make a successful retreat. Perhaps without these two Poles, there would be no United States. This is not an exaggeration. Individuals and individual decisions often make history. Just think of that today if not for Steve Jobs or Thomas Edison, or Tesla; we may not be watching this. Many of us are more familiar with World War II, though Poland is the least appreciated and most manipulated nation from that era. The war began because of the invasion of Poland by the Germans, and most people don't know that the Soviets invaded Poland 16 days later, yet they would be considered our allies - they were no better and, in fact, casualty-wise, worse. The Soviets murdered 22 thousand Polish officers at Katyn, and between 1937 -1938, over 100 thousand Poles died in a Soviet genocide. Many Russians themselves were victims. The problem is that our Western intellectuals have been promoting this ideology. Many of these horrific crimes have been covered up, and much of it is. Like 100 million dead from communism isn't enough, will it work next time? Unlike what you hear, the Polish actually fought quite hard against the Germans, but they couldn't do that for long because they were attacked on two flanks. Some of the Polish armies were capable of escaping, and the Polish army in exile made up the fourth-largest allied army. The Polish had an underground army with more than the French resistance you always hear about. Still, the Polish didn't get to sit at the winner's table as the French, although the French even had a collaborative government. Poland never surrendered to the invaders and fought from the first to the last day of the war. There were cooperating governments in many other countries but not in Poland. The Polish underground army was a phenomenon on a worldwide and historical scale. They had a 650,000-man army - 400,000 AK soldiers and 250,000 volunteers fighting alongside the Allies in the West. Without them, the war may have been very different, and this is beyond doubt for Polish pilots that came to the rescue of the British pilots when they most needed them. The Battle of Britain was pivotal, and we know that the Polish pilots were game-changers. Indeed, even more, the Poles were the ones the broke the Enigma code, which deciphered German secrets. Imagine what may have happened without these geniuses? These are just a few of the many ways the Polish played a role in World War II, but how often do you hear about them? Maybe their inability to march in the victory parade in London would foretell some of why. Even though the war was won and the Polish came to their rescue, the British didn't want to offend the Communist Stalin, to whom they gave Poland after the war. The Polish were betrayed at the start of the war and would be betrayed at the end. No real liberation would come until 1989, and still, to this day; they are betrayed by dishonest historians, who we call neo-Stalinists, intent on defaming the Polish after all they have been through. This is why it is vital to check out your reading to ensure it is factual and not manipulated. Today, this history is being abused for various agendas, including one that involves a lot of money. When this is at stake, so-called historians will work hand in hand with those who want that money. We all know what money does. The country has been invaded or has fought for freedom in insurrections over 40 times. Poland adopted its first written constitution in the spring of 1791, which was the 2nd in the world valid legal document of the kind. The Old Town that you can see in Warsaw isn't the actual Old Town from before the war. The original was bombed entirely in the 40s, and Poles rebuilt it after the war using Bernardo Bellotto's detailed paintings. It now looks as it did in the 18th century rather than the 20th. Marie Curie, who discovered Polon and Rad, wasn't French but Polish. Her name was Marie Sklodowska before she married a Frenchman named Pierre Curie. She was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, the first and only woman to win twice, and the only person to win a Nobel Prize in two different sciences. Joseph Conrad was actually Polish too. Poland has the second oldest university in the whole of Europe - Jagiellonian University, founded by King Casimir III the Great in the year 1364. The most famous astronomer in the world was from Poland. Nicolaus Copernicus was also a Renaissance mathematician. There have been 17 different Nobel Prize winners from Poland. This speech is just the tip of the iceberg for Polish history. There is much more to explore – I challenge you to start your journey. Thanks for viewing!🙏

Edward Reid

284,662 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War 🚨The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked 🚨The Background to the Ukraine War ▶Biden says, our purpose is regime change in Russia. ▶The U.S. has been involved, and particularly the neocons in the White House. ▶We promise that we will not move NATO one inch to the east. ▶Brzezinski says, we should start start this process by moving NATO into all the former satellite states. George Kennan said, if you do that, you are going to provoke a violent response from Russia. They cannot live with NATO on their borders. ▶William James Perry was, was Clinton's Secretary of State he said, if you do this, you go forward with this plan, I'm going to resign, because it's so foolhardy, you are, you are forcing Russia into a violent military response. ▶The US ambassador to the Soviet Union, at that time, who is now ahead of the, of the CIA, said the same thing. It is, it's the worst mistake. ▶It's the worst mistake America can make to move NATO to the east. So we went ahead and did it. We moved it not at one, not one inch, but 1000 miles, 14 countries. ▶We put nuclear ready missile launchers, Aegis missile systems, which are made by Lockheed and can take Tomahawk missiles. 12 minutes from Moscow. ▶Russia has said, and Putin said again and again and again, this is a red line before Putin. ▶The Russians were invaded three times through Ukraine. ▶Hitler killed between 20 and 40 million Russians, Hitler killed one out of every seven Russians. ▶In my uncle's speech to his most famous speech in American University in 1963. In July of 1963. He said to the American people, he said, you know, we're all taught we won World War Two, but we didn't win World War Two. The Russians won. And the sacrifice they made to destroy Hitler was beyond anything Americans can imagine. He was trying to tell the American people, you have to put your yourselves ourselves in their position and understand what they're doing. ▶The CIA has overthrown, I think, 83 governments between 1947 and 1997. That's a third of the governments on earth, and most of them were democracies. ▶The new government, the first rule they pass is to make the Russian language essentially illegal in Donbass and Lugansk, where 90% of the population are Russian, and they and there's then peaceful uprising, which people begin dying, you know, they turn violent. ▶The newspapers never told us, our government never told us. USAID, which is the CIA front, put $5 billion into funding those riots. Those riots lead to the a coup d'etat against the first elected democratically elected government of the Ukraine. ▶Zelensky won the election because he ran on a peace platform. He ran promising that he would sign the Minsk Accords. He gets into office, the minute he gets there, and he's told everybody, I'm going to sign the Minsk Accords and settle the peace with Russia. He he suddenly pivots. ▶Victoria Nuland and Anthony Blinken and April Haynes, who's the DNI, Director of National Intelligence, told him you cannot have a peace with Russia. ▶In March of 2022, Zelensky and Putin agree on a peace agreement that's based upon the Minsk Accords. It's like Minsk Accords 2.0. And Zelensky initials it, the Russians initial it, and Russia begins withdrawing its troops from Ukraine. And what happens, President Biden sends Boris Johnson over there to torpedo the agreement and make, make Zelensky tear it up. ▶Who owns those military contractors, and you see who gets on CNN to bump up the Ukraine war. contractors, and you see who gets on CNN to bump up the Ukraine war. It's a bunch of former generals and colonels and Pentagon people. But if you go in and CNN never and MSNBC never do this. If you go look at those guys, they're all people who are working for Raytheon and General Dynamics and Boeing and Lockheed. So they're generals, but they're not identified that, you know, they're actually working for the military contractors who are cashing in on the war. And then, you know, those military contractors in turn are owned by three companies, all of them are owned by three companies by BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard. And, and, you know, the inflation that from printing the money to fund the war and to fund the 2016 trillion we spent to fund the lockdowns, the COVID lockdowns, 8 trillion we've spent on these wars since 2020, all of them losing wars, all of them that made our country less safe. ▶Look at what this war is doing. We have pushed Russia into the embrace of China, which is the worst foreign policy outcome imaginable. 🚨 If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed.
21:29

🚨The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine War 🚨The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked 🚨The Background to the Ukraine War ▶Biden says, our purpose is regime change in Russia. ▶The U.S. has been involved, and particularly the neocons in the White House. ▶We promise that we will not move NATO one inch to the east. ▶Brzezinski says, we should start start this process by moving NATO into all the former satellite states. George Kennan said, if you do that, you are going to provoke a violent response from Russia. They cannot live with NATO on their borders. ▶William James Perry was, was Clinton's Secretary of State he said, if you do this, you go forward with this plan, I'm going to resign, because it's so foolhardy, you are, you are forcing Russia into a violent military response. ▶The US ambassador to the Soviet Union, at that time, who is now ahead of the, of the CIA, said the same thing. It is, it's the worst mistake. ▶It's the worst mistake America can make to move NATO to the east. So we went ahead and did it. We moved it not at one, not one inch, but 1000 miles, 14 countries. ▶We put nuclear ready missile launchers, Aegis missile systems, which are made by Lockheed and can take Tomahawk missiles. 12 minutes from Moscow. ▶Russia has said, and Putin said again and again and again, this is a red line before Putin. ▶The Russians were invaded three times through Ukraine. ▶Hitler killed between 20 and 40 million Russians, Hitler killed one out of every seven Russians. ▶In my uncle's speech to his most famous speech in American University in 1963. In July of 1963. He said to the American people, he said, you know, we're all taught we won World War Two, but we didn't win World War Two. The Russians won. And the sacrifice they made to destroy Hitler was beyond anything Americans can imagine. He was trying to tell the American people, you have to put your yourselves ourselves in their position and understand what they're doing. ▶The CIA has overthrown, I think, 83 governments between 1947 and 1997. That's a third of the governments on earth, and most of them were democracies. ▶The new government, the first rule they pass is to make the Russian language essentially illegal in Donbass and Lugansk, where 90% of the population are Russian, and they and there's then peaceful uprising, which people begin dying, you know, they turn violent. ▶The newspapers never told us, our government never told us. USAID, which is the CIA front, put $5 billion into funding those riots. Those riots lead to the a coup d'etat against the first elected democratically elected government of the Ukraine. ▶Zelensky won the election because he ran on a peace platform. He ran promising that he would sign the Minsk Accords. He gets into office, the minute he gets there, and he's told everybody, I'm going to sign the Minsk Accords and settle the peace with Russia. He he suddenly pivots. ▶Victoria Nuland and Anthony Blinken and April Haynes, who's the DNI, Director of National Intelligence, told him you cannot have a peace with Russia. ▶In March of 2022, Zelensky and Putin agree on a peace agreement that's based upon the Minsk Accords. It's like Minsk Accords 2.0. And Zelensky initials it, the Russians initial it, and Russia begins withdrawing its troops from Ukraine. And what happens, President Biden sends Boris Johnson over there to torpedo the agreement and make, make Zelensky tear it up. ▶Who owns those military contractors, and you see who gets on CNN to bump up the Ukraine war. contractors, and you see who gets on CNN to bump up the Ukraine war. It's a bunch of former generals and colonels and Pentagon people. But if you go in and CNN never and MSNBC never do this. If you go look at those guys, they're all people who are working for Raytheon and General Dynamics and Boeing and Lockheed. So they're generals, but they're not identified that, you know, they're actually working for the military contractors who are cashing in on the war. And then, you know, those military contractors in turn are owned by three companies, all of them are owned by three companies by BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard. And, and, you know, the inflation that from printing the money to fund the war and to fund the 2016 trillion we spent to fund the lockdowns, the COVID lockdowns, 8 trillion we've spent on these wars since 2020, all of them losing wars, all of them that made our country less safe. ▶Look at what this war is doing. We have pushed Russia into the embrace of China, which is the worst foreign policy outcome imaginable. 🚨 If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

20,268 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨EXCLUSIVE: The untold story of the FBI’s J6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2”🚨 If what the FBI’s January 6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2” (POI2) told me about his FBI interview is true, there is further proof that the Bureau has covered up, or “deleted,” additional video footage about what happened when the RNC pipe bomb was allegedly discovered by Karlin Younger on January 6, 2021. I will not reveal the identity or any other identifying information about the FBI’s POI2 in the January 6 pipe bomb saga. I also won't discuss the full five hours of personal interview time with POI2; instead, I will focus on two key pieces of information he gave me. As a primer for those not already following this story in detail, here is a brief rundown of the facts in POI2’s case and why the FBI was initially interested in him as a “person of interest”: -POI2 does not live in the Greater D.C. area. He lives in a large American city in a state that does not border D.C. -From news releases, congressional reports, FBI statements, and an FBI whistleblower disclosure, we know that POI2 was visiting a lifelong acquaintance (POI3) at his residence in Fall Church, VA, over the course of January 4 - 7, 2021. -POI2 used POI3’s Metrorail card for travel back and forth to the District on the 5th and 6th. -POI2 caught the attention of law enforcement investigators when he emerged from D.C.’s Metro South rail station on January 5, changed hats and put on dark sunglasses, then beelined straight across the street from the station into the Rumsey Court alley behind the Republican National Committee headquarters. It was in that alley that POI2 began taking photos of “numbers.” Numbers on trash cans, dumpsters, door addresses, and the like. According to the FBI, POI2 planned to use those photographs in a forthcoming book. (To date, that book has not been published.) Then, after walking around Capitol Hill all day long, and even attending some of the J5 protest events, POI2 ducked back into the same alley for a few minutes — after dark — before returning to the Metro South station across the street from the RNC. He returned to Falls Church via the train, where POI3 picked him up by car, and they went back to POI3’s home. POI2 then returned to DC the next morning to attend Trump’s speech at The Ellipse on the 6th. -POI2 was cleared of suspicion following two FBI interviews on January 19, 2021, at his residence in his home city. These interviews took place six days after the FBI pulled their Special Operations Group (SOG) surveillance team off POI3’s home on January 13, just two days after they were deployed to watch the infamous Falls Church, VA condominium address where we now know POI3 shared a firewall between his address and the then residence of former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff. The subject of our November 8, 2025 story published by Blaze Media. How I came to spend five hours with POI2 I met with POI2 twice, on December 11 and 12, 2025. On the 11th, a member of our team accompanied me: a retired FBI veteran of 25 years now working as a private investigator. That first interview lasted for three hours, and then the next day I met with POI2, just him and me, for another two hours. I arrived in POI2’s home city on the 10th to do some early recon. We had POI2’s name (which I’d acquired from a congressional source), and his address, but we didn’t have a current phone number. After running an extensive background on him, we learned a lot about his life and work, social media, friends and close associates, and even where he attends church, but we still didn't have a phone number to call him and ask for a meeting. Most interesting of all, POI2 is a prolific international traveler. In one recent year, he had logged over 40 international flights. So we didn’t even know if he’d be in the country, much less at home, if we knocked on this door. My recon of his address was a huge disappointment. His apartment building is one of those old inner-city manufacturing plants refitted into modern, upscale housing. The entire property is ringed by tall wrought-iron fencing, with electronic security for entry into the parking garage, foot traffic, and into the building itself. There was no visible way for us to just pay him a visit for a “knock and talk.” Perhaps we could have “buzzed” him from an exterior gate, but I didn’t get that far that day. Later that evening, I picked up my team member from the airport — the retired FBI guy — and we went to dinner for a long, late-night planning session. We identified a couple of strong local personal connections he had via his Facebook page, and we planned to visit them first, get more info about POI2, and maybe even get their help reaching out to him. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning, we arrived at the home of someone who seemed like they might be closest to him. We were lucky and hit a home run on the first swing. Without the long details, our “story” about why we were looking for POI2 — their close friend — worked like a charm, and we were invited into their home. Our host called POI2, and within two hours POI2 joined us at our new friend’s home. Luckily, POI2 had returned to the States from an overseas trip only the day before. For the next three hours, I asked most of the questions while my partner listened and observed. Based on my partner’s 25+ years of experience with the FBI, he believed POI2 answered everything truthfully … “Or, he’s a very, very good liar.” My partner had to fly back home the next morning, but I had many follow-up questions for POI2. I reached out again early in the morning, and he agreed to meet me at a coffee shop in his neighborhood. ***(On a personal timeline aside: during my second interview with POI2, I was only nine days away from my heart failure episode, and was already struggling to breath after the slightest of physical exertions.)*** The most significant reveal We met at 1:30 p.m., and spent another two full hours together. During this session, we had a detailed conversation about his two interviews with two FBI special agents. Both of those interviews were on the same day. January 19, 2021. POI2 had explained to the FBI agents that the reason he returned to the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC was that he remembered there were several trash cans in the alley, and he wanted to dispose of an empty plastic water bottle before going back to the train station. I asked him why he didn’t simply throw the bottle away at the Metrotrain station. He shrugged. From our video review, POI2 only stayed in the alley for about three to four minutes. But if what he revealed to me is true, it is one of the most significant discoveries in our years-long pipe bomb investigation. POI2 shared with me that the FBI agents told him that he had thrown the empty water bottle away in the very trash container next to where the bomb would be placed a little over an hour and a half later. Why that is significant FIRST, it reveals that the FBI most likely had video of him depositing that empty bottle into that container. Yes … they could have taken DNA samples of every item in that trash can, but then they would also have needed DNA from POI2 in their database. POI2 didn’t offer that option as their explanation. He assumed they saw him on camera. I can personally attest that there is currently a camera in Rumsey Court that would cover the area where the bomb was placed, but I do not know if that same camera existed in January of 2021. But if they did observe POI2, on camera, tossing the bottle in the trash can immediately next to where the bomb was placed, then the FBI most certainly has video of Karlin Younger — the FirstNet employee — who discovered that device at approximately 12:35 p.m. the next day, January 6. Only 25 minutes before Vice President Mike Pence was to drop the gavel on the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 Electoral College presidential vote. Only about 18 minutes before the first breach of that outer bike rack barricade on the west Capitol grounds, led by Ray Epps, Ryan Samsel, and other suspicious characters. Many investigators, including Congressman Loudermilk and his committee, have posited that the two devices placed by the gray hooded bomber on J5 were retrieved at some point in the early morning hours of J6, then replaced just before their “discovery” a few minutes either side of 1:00 p.m. The allegedly “deleted” video from the two DNC cameras that provided the footage of the gray hooded bomber placing a device on the evening of J5 would have also shown us what happened after midnight. Whether or not the two plainclothes Capitol Police counter-surveillance officers were the ones who replaced the device just before reporting its discovery to the Secret Service agents attending VP-Elect Kamala Harris’s presence inside the building at the time. (Article to that story linked in comments below.) A camera aimed at the RNC drop location would give us the same information about what happened during the night, and when Karlin Younger discovered that device while walking back and forth and doing her laundry. The FBI claims that the footage from the two DNC cameras — after that device was planted under a bench — was accidentally deleted. (No one buys that story.) Those two FBI agents may also have inadvertently revealed to POI2 that video footage exists from that dark corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club alley on J5 and J6. Both missing videos, if they were to surface, would either invalidate all conspiracy theories about the pipe bombs, or confirm the prevailing theories and circumstantial evidence pointing to law enforcement participation and a multi-agency conspiracy. SECOND, if the two FBI agents were telling POI2 the truth about that specific trash container, then it brings into question all of POI2’s own statements about why he returned to that alley after dark. That very trash can was in the furthest and darkest corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club side of Rumsey Court. He would have had to ignore several of the first and most clearly visible, well-lit trash bins upon his arrival into that alley by way of the walkway between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club. Instead, he made a hard left behind the Capitol Hill Club and headed toward the darkest corner of the alley, from which the view of that trash can was also likely obstructed by one or more cars typically parked between him and what would be his line of sight to that dark corner. This implies POI2 was either on a recon mission to determine the best drop location for the second device, or, as one retired, formerly high-ranking law enforcement officer has theorized, he may have placed an AirTag or other electronic beacon to lead the bomber to the most advantageous location to deposit the bomb. Near the end of my second meeting with POI2, he shared with me several photos of “numbers” he took in that alley. He shared the “time and location” data from those original photos on his iPhone. He also gave me screenshots from his phone’s call history of the exact moment the two FBI agents phoned him for both interviews on January 19, 2021. He was very earnest, forthcoming, and eager to answer all my questions. (Photo examples in comments below.) As a person, I like POI2. We could be friends. But either he or the FBI is lying about what happened in that dark corner behind the Capitol Hill Club. (Maybe both?) Just as POI2 and I were about to say goodbye and shake hands, I opened my phone to show him one photo. It was the shot I took of the two side-by-side doors at the condo complex in Falls Church, VA. The door on the left was the home of his lifelong acquaintance, POI3. The door on the right was Shauni Kerkhoff's January 6 residence. I asked him: “Can you make this math work for me?” He replied: “No, man. That’s so weird.” We have stayed in contact and spoken many times since those two days in December. ⬇️
0:49

🚨EXCLUSIVE: The untold story of the FBI’s J6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2”🚨 If what the FBI’s January 6 pipe bomber “Person of Interest #2” (POI2) told me about his FBI interview is true, there is further proof that the Bureau has covered up, or “deleted,” additional video footage about what happened when the RNC pipe bomb was allegedly discovered by Karlin Younger on January 6, 2021. I will not reveal the identity or any other identifying information about the FBI’s POI2 in the January 6 pipe bomb saga. I also won't discuss the full five hours of personal interview time with POI2; instead, I will focus on two key pieces of information he gave me. As a primer for those not already following this story in detail, here is a brief rundown of the facts in POI2’s case and why the FBI was initially interested in him as a “person of interest”: -POI2 does not live in the Greater D.C. area. He lives in a large American city in a state that does not border D.C. -From news releases, congressional reports, FBI statements, and an FBI whistleblower disclosure, we know that POI2 was visiting a lifelong acquaintance (POI3) at his residence in Fall Church, VA, over the course of January 4 - 7, 2021. -POI2 used POI3’s Metrorail card for travel back and forth to the District on the 5th and 6th. -POI2 caught the attention of law enforcement investigators when he emerged from D.C.’s Metro South rail station on January 5, changed hats and put on dark sunglasses, then beelined straight across the street from the station into the Rumsey Court alley behind the Republican National Committee headquarters. It was in that alley that POI2 began taking photos of “numbers.” Numbers on trash cans, dumpsters, door addresses, and the like. According to the FBI, POI2 planned to use those photographs in a forthcoming book. (To date, that book has not been published.) Then, after walking around Capitol Hill all day long, and even attending some of the J5 protest events, POI2 ducked back into the same alley for a few minutes — after dark — before returning to the Metro South station across the street from the RNC. He returned to Falls Church via the train, where POI3 picked him up by car, and they went back to POI3’s home. POI2 then returned to DC the next morning to attend Trump’s speech at The Ellipse on the 6th. -POI2 was cleared of suspicion following two FBI interviews on January 19, 2021, at his residence in his home city. These interviews took place six days after the FBI pulled their Special Operations Group (SOG) surveillance team off POI3’s home on January 13, just two days after they were deployed to watch the infamous Falls Church, VA condominium address where we now know POI3 shared a firewall between his address and the then residence of former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff. The subject of our November 8, 2025 story published by Blaze Media. How I came to spend five hours with POI2 I met with POI2 twice, on December 11 and 12, 2025. On the 11th, a member of our team accompanied me: a retired FBI veteran of 25 years now working as a private investigator. That first interview lasted for three hours, and then the next day I met with POI2, just him and me, for another two hours. I arrived in POI2’s home city on the 10th to do some early recon. We had POI2’s name (which I’d acquired from a congressional source), and his address, but we didn’t have a current phone number. After running an extensive background on him, we learned a lot about his life and work, social media, friends and close associates, and even where he attends church, but we still didn't have a phone number to call him and ask for a meeting. Most interesting of all, POI2 is a prolific international traveler. In one recent year, he had logged over 40 international flights. So we didn’t even know if he’d be in the country, much less at home, if we knocked on this door. My recon of his address was a huge disappointment. His apartment building is one of those old inner-city manufacturing plants refitted into modern, upscale housing. The entire property is ringed by tall wrought-iron fencing, with electronic security for entry into the parking garage, foot traffic, and into the building itself. There was no visible way for us to just pay him a visit for a “knock and talk.” Perhaps we could have “buzzed” him from an exterior gate, but I didn’t get that far that day. Later that evening, I picked up my team member from the airport — the retired FBI guy — and we went to dinner for a long, late-night planning session. We identified a couple of strong local personal connections he had via his Facebook page, and we planned to visit them first, get more info about POI2, and maybe even get their help reaching out to him. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning, we arrived at the home of someone who seemed like they might be closest to him. We were lucky and hit a home run on the first swing. Without the long details, our “story” about why we were looking for POI2 — their close friend — worked like a charm, and we were invited into their home. Our host called POI2, and within two hours POI2 joined us at our new friend’s home. Luckily, POI2 had returned to the States from an overseas trip only the day before. For the next three hours, I asked most of the questions while my partner listened and observed. Based on my partner’s 25+ years of experience with the FBI, he believed POI2 answered everything truthfully … “Or, he’s a very, very good liar.” My partner had to fly back home the next morning, but I had many follow-up questions for POI2. I reached out again early in the morning, and he agreed to meet me at a coffee shop in his neighborhood. ***(On a personal timeline aside: during my second interview with POI2, I was only nine days away from my heart failure episode, and was already struggling to breath after the slightest of physical exertions.)*** The most significant reveal We met at 1:30 p.m., and spent another two full hours together. During this session, we had a detailed conversation about his two interviews with two FBI special agents. Both of those interviews were on the same day. January 19, 2021. POI2 had explained to the FBI agents that the reason he returned to the Rumsey Court alley behind the RNC was that he remembered there were several trash cans in the alley, and he wanted to dispose of an empty plastic water bottle before going back to the train station. I asked him why he didn’t simply throw the bottle away at the Metrotrain station. He shrugged. From our video review, POI2 only stayed in the alley for about three to four minutes. But if what he revealed to me is true, it is one of the most significant discoveries in our years-long pipe bomb investigation. POI2 shared with me that the FBI agents told him that he had thrown the empty water bottle away in the very trash container next to where the bomb would be placed a little over an hour and a half later. Why that is significant FIRST, it reveals that the FBI most likely had video of him depositing that empty bottle into that container. Yes … they could have taken DNA samples of every item in that trash can, but then they would also have needed DNA from POI2 in their database. POI2 didn’t offer that option as their explanation. He assumed they saw him on camera. I can personally attest that there is currently a camera in Rumsey Court that would cover the area where the bomb was placed, but I do not know if that same camera existed in January of 2021. But if they did observe POI2, on camera, tossing the bottle in the trash can immediately next to where the bomb was placed, then the FBI most certainly has video of Karlin Younger — the FirstNet employee — who discovered that device at approximately 12:35 p.m. the next day, January 6. Only 25 minutes before Vice President Mike Pence was to drop the gavel on the joint session of Congress to certify the 2020 Electoral College presidential vote. Only about 18 minutes before the first breach of that outer bike rack barricade on the west Capitol grounds, led by Ray Epps, Ryan Samsel, and other suspicious characters. Many investigators, including Congressman Loudermilk and his committee, have posited that the two devices placed by the gray hooded bomber on J5 were retrieved at some point in the early morning hours of J6, then replaced just before their “discovery” a few minutes either side of 1:00 p.m. The allegedly “deleted” video from the two DNC cameras that provided the footage of the gray hooded bomber placing a device on the evening of J5 would have also shown us what happened after midnight. Whether or not the two plainclothes Capitol Police counter-surveillance officers were the ones who replaced the device just before reporting its discovery to the Secret Service agents attending VP-Elect Kamala Harris’s presence inside the building at the time. (Article to that story linked in comments below.) A camera aimed at the RNC drop location would give us the same information about what happened during the night, and when Karlin Younger discovered that device while walking back and forth and doing her laundry. The FBI claims that the footage from the two DNC cameras — after that device was planted under a bench — was accidentally deleted. (No one buys that story.) Those two FBI agents may also have inadvertently revealed to POI2 that video footage exists from that dark corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club alley on J5 and J6. Both missing videos, if they were to surface, would either invalidate all conspiracy theories about the pipe bombs, or confirm the prevailing theories and circumstantial evidence pointing to law enforcement participation and a multi-agency conspiracy. SECOND, if the two FBI agents were telling POI2 the truth about that specific trash container, then it brings into question all of POI2’s own statements about why he returned to that alley after dark. That very trash can was in the furthest and darkest corner of the RNC/Capitol Hill Club side of Rumsey Court. He would have had to ignore several of the first and most clearly visible, well-lit trash bins upon his arrival into that alley by way of the walkway between the RNC and the Capitol Hill Club. Instead, he made a hard left behind the Capitol Hill Club and headed toward the darkest corner of the alley, from which the view of that trash can was also likely obstructed by one or more cars typically parked between him and what would be his line of sight to that dark corner. This implies POI2 was either on a recon mission to determine the best drop location for the second device, or, as one retired, formerly high-ranking law enforcement officer has theorized, he may have placed an AirTag or other electronic beacon to lead the bomber to the most advantageous location to deposit the bomb. Near the end of my second meeting with POI2, he shared with me several photos of “numbers” he took in that alley. He shared the “time and location” data from those original photos on his iPhone. He also gave me screenshots from his phone’s call history of the exact moment the two FBI agents phoned him for both interviews on January 19, 2021. He was very earnest, forthcoming, and eager to answer all my questions. (Photo examples in comments below.) As a person, I like POI2. We could be friends. But either he or the FBI is lying about what happened in that dark corner behind the Capitol Hill Club. (Maybe both?) Just as POI2 and I were about to say goodbye and shake hands, I opened my phone to show him one photo. It was the shot I took of the two side-by-side doors at the condo complex in Falls Church, VA. The door on the left was the home of his lifelong acquaintance, POI3. The door on the right was Shauni Kerkhoff's January 6 residence. I asked him: “Can you make this math work for me?” He replied: “No, man. That’s so weird.” We have stayed in contact and spoken many times since those two days in December. ⬇️

Steve Baker

908,677 次观看 • 13 天前

Chicken Wars: a Rudaw investigative report on harmful substances in Kurdistan Region poultry farms has spiraled into a full-blown media confrontation between the two most powerful outlets in the Barzani orbit: Three days ago, Rudaw aired an investigative program focused on poultry farms. The report revealed that furaltadone, a veterinary drug banned in the United States and other countries for over 40 years, had been found in several livestock farms. The drug, which is linked to DNA damage, cancer, and leaves behind chemical residues (AMOZ) in animal tissue, had reportedly entered the Kurdistan Region with altered packaging and labels. Sulaimani's acting mayor confirmed that the substance had been seized and that an investigation was underway. The city's head of veterinary services said farms that had used the drug were placed under monitoring. The program gained enormous traction. Public reaction was swift, and poultry sales reportedly collapsed across parts of Kurdistan, with farm owners claiming significant financial losses. Rather than engaging with the substance of the findings, Ava Media responded the following day with a blanket defense of domestic poultry production. It framed the Rudaw report as a politically motivated effort to damage local producers and, by implication, benefit importers of frozen chicken. The accusation, made without naming names directly, pointed toward figures in Nechirvan Barzani's circle. Ava's programming then escalated into spectacle. Poultry farm owners were invited onto the channel, where they ate their own chicken on air during iftar as a show of confidence. Both networks traded accusations and counter-programming for days, dominating Kurdish social media. For context, Rudaw is owned by Nechirvan Barzani while Ava Media is owned by Masrour Barzani. Several things undermine Ava's counter-narrative. The Rudaw investigation appears to have been substantively accurate. Independent journalists, including Dilshad Anwar of the Panjara news site, assessed the original coverage as reasonable and well-founded. Authorities confirmed the seizure of the banned drug, and arrests were reportedly made. Rudaw's program did not claim that all poultry farms were affected. It reported that specific harmful practices had been identified and appeared to have been verified. Ava's central claim, that the report was designed to boost frozen chicken imports, does not hold up legally either. As opposition figure Ali Hama Salih pointed out, the import of frozen chicken is already banned by law in the Kurdistan Region. If frozen chicken is entering the market, that is a failure of the KRG, which Masrour Barzani leads, to enforce its own regulations. The framing inadvertently raises questions about the government's own oversight rather than discrediting the original report. It also, perhaps unintentionally, reinforces the very problem Rudaw exposed: if banned frozen chicken is making it through the borders, then so are banned veterinary drugs like furaltadone, because both enter through the same loose and uncontrolled crossings. The poultry drama also sits within a broader food safety crisis that neither outlet has fully reckoned with. Alongside the furaltadone findings, food safety experts have flagged serious concerns about imported agricultural produce entering the Kurdistan Region without adequate chemical testing. Food specialist Lashkar Hamid has said that nitrate levels in tested samples of cucumbers, zucchini, and tomatoes were ten times above accepted standards. Opposition parliamentarians have alleged that large volumes of goods bypass customs and quality controls entirely, entering through so-called "coordination lines" at border crossings, with fees collected by parties and officials. A KRG official, speaking anonymously, described the situation at the borders as "a disaster," adding that all relevant government institutions are aware but remain silent. The Ministry of Agriculture was reportedly informed of excessive nitrate levels in imported produce as early as February 2019. No meaningful action has been taken since.
6:39

Chicken Wars: a Rudaw investigative report on harmful substances in Kurdistan Region poultry farms has spiraled into a full-blown media confrontation between the two most powerful outlets in the Barzani orbit: Three days ago, Rudaw aired an investigative program focused on poultry farms. The report revealed that furaltadone, a veterinary drug banned in the United States and other countries for over 40 years, had been found in several livestock farms. The drug, which is linked to DNA damage, cancer, and leaves behind chemical residues (AMOZ) in animal tissue, had reportedly entered the Kurdistan Region with altered packaging and labels. Sulaimani's acting mayor confirmed that the substance had been seized and that an investigation was underway. The city's head of veterinary services said farms that had used the drug were placed under monitoring. The program gained enormous traction. Public reaction was swift, and poultry sales reportedly collapsed across parts of Kurdistan, with farm owners claiming significant financial losses. Rather than engaging with the substance of the findings, Ava Media responded the following day with a blanket defense of domestic poultry production. It framed the Rudaw report as a politically motivated effort to damage local producers and, by implication, benefit importers of frozen chicken. The accusation, made without naming names directly, pointed toward figures in Nechirvan Barzani's circle. Ava's programming then escalated into spectacle. Poultry farm owners were invited onto the channel, where they ate their own chicken on air during iftar as a show of confidence. Both networks traded accusations and counter-programming for days, dominating Kurdish social media. For context, Rudaw is owned by Nechirvan Barzani while Ava Media is owned by Masrour Barzani. Several things undermine Ava's counter-narrative. The Rudaw investigation appears to have been substantively accurate. Independent journalists, including Dilshad Anwar of the Panjara news site, assessed the original coverage as reasonable and well-founded. Authorities confirmed the seizure of the banned drug, and arrests were reportedly made. Rudaw's program did not claim that all poultry farms were affected. It reported that specific harmful practices had been identified and appeared to have been verified. Ava's central claim, that the report was designed to boost frozen chicken imports, does not hold up legally either. As opposition figure Ali Hama Salih pointed out, the import of frozen chicken is already banned by law in the Kurdistan Region. If frozen chicken is entering the market, that is a failure of the KRG, which Masrour Barzani leads, to enforce its own regulations. The framing inadvertently raises questions about the government's own oversight rather than discrediting the original report. It also, perhaps unintentionally, reinforces the very problem Rudaw exposed: if banned frozen chicken is making it through the borders, then so are banned veterinary drugs like furaltadone, because both enter through the same loose and uncontrolled crossings. The poultry drama also sits within a broader food safety crisis that neither outlet has fully reckoned with. Alongside the furaltadone findings, food safety experts have flagged serious concerns about imported agricultural produce entering the Kurdistan Region without adequate chemical testing. Food specialist Lashkar Hamid has said that nitrate levels in tested samples of cucumbers, zucchini, and tomatoes were ten times above accepted standards. Opposition parliamentarians have alleged that large volumes of goods bypass customs and quality controls entirely, entering through so-called "coordination lines" at border crossings, with fees collected by parties and officials. A KRG official, speaking anonymously, described the situation at the borders as "a disaster," adding that all relevant government institutions are aware but remain silent. The Ministry of Agriculture was reportedly informed of excessive nitrate levels in imported produce as early as February 2019. No meaningful action has been taken since.

Kurdistan Watch

10,234 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱 Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th. The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location. 1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM) The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight. The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport. The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM). 2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara. Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet. It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM. The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew. The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika. 3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac. The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM. The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?. The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene. 4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN") Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet. The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival. Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers). Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side). Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight. 5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing. The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed. Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold. THE VERDICT The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty." Be sure to FOLLOW Baron Coleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇
39:38

🚨 Erika Kirk's ALIBI Is Destroyed —Baron Coleman PROVES Erika Was Likely In Provo BEFORE The Shot.😱 Baron Coleman just released the most damning timeline yet. Using contemporaneous flight logs, transponder data, and deleted police dispatch audio, he has reconstructed the real movements of September 10th. The Conclusion: Erika Kirk didn't fly in to hold her dying husband. She was likely on the ground in Provo two hours before he was shot. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the "Shell Game" they played with the planes to hide her location. 1. THE "GHOST FLIGHT" (10:06 AM) The Evidence: Flight N560TW (a private charter) left Scottsdale, AZ, and landed in Provo at 10:06 AM. The Theory: Baron believes Erika Kirk was on this flight. The Connection: At 10:05 AM—exactly one minute before this plane landed—the transponder of the mysterious Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) turned on at the Provo airport. The Implication: If Erika was on this flight, she was in Provo 2.5 hours BEFORE the "Big Bang" (which happened at 12:23 PM). 2. THE "REPOSITIONING" SHELL GAME After dropping its passenger (Erika?) in Provo, that same plane (N560TW) immediately took off for Santa Barbara. Why? To pick up Andrew Kolvet. It then flew Andrew from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale, arriving around 1:40 PM. The Switch: Meanwhile, the Kirk family plane (Delta Zulu) flew empty from Salt Lake City to Scottsdale to meet Andrew. The Decoy: Andrew likely boarded the Delta Zulu flight in Scottsdale to fly back to Provo, making it look like the plane was bringing Erika. 3. THE "FALLING INTO ARMS" LIE Official Story: Andrew Kolvet claimed that when he landed in Provo, he "fell into Erika's arms" on the tarmac. The Problem: The flight Andrew supposedly took (Regency) didn't land until 4:36 PM. The flight Erika supposedly took (Delta Zulu) landed at 3:12 PM. The Contradiction: Are we supposed to believe Erika landed and then sat around the airport for 90 minutes while her husband was dying at the hospital?. The Real Story: If Baron is right, Erika had been at the airport since 10:06 AM. When Andrew arrived on the decoy flight at 3:12 PM, she was there to meet him and stage the scene. 4. THE DELETED POLICE AUDIO ("SIGNATURE" VS. "DUNCAN") Baron played a saved dispatch recording that has since been scrubbed from the internet. The Audio: Police/Fire dispatchers are coordinating Erika's arrival. Officer 1 (Jesse): "Charlie's wife is coming to Signature" (The main FBO for rich travelers). Officer 2 (Corey): "No, no, no. They're landing at Duncan" (A remote terminal on the far north side). Why the confusion? If she was flying in on the family jet, she would go to Signature. The confusion suggests she was already on the ground, possibly hiding at the remote Duncan terminal, and the team couldn't keep their story straight. 5. THE EGYPTIAN JET CONNECTION Baron points out that the Egyptian Jet (SU-BND) transponder turned on three separate times that day—and each time was within 5 minutes of an Erika/Andrew flight taking off or landing. The Photo: A photo taken between 11:00-11:30 AM shows the Egyptian jet sitting on the tarmac with its ladder down and windows closed. Baron's Theory: Erika may have been sitting on that plane (a communications hub) while waiting for the event to unfold. THE VERDICT The timeline destroys the alibi. If Erika Kirk was in Provo at 10:06 AM, she lied to the police, she lied to the public, and she placed herself at the scene of the crime. "If you say you weren't at the scene of the crime, but you turned out you were... you look guilty." Be sure to FOLLOW Baron Coleman and go watch his FULL Episode, linked down below👇

Project Constitution

194,911 次观看 • 7 个月前

No, I don't think so. I think Conor McGregor's tailoring is best understood in the context of how labor has been deskilled for almost 200 years. Let me explain. Before the mid-19th century, most men who were not manual laborers wore bespoke clothes. In other words, their clothes were made specifically for them, typically by women working in the home or by bespoke tailors. This is how the King of Spain gets his clothes. When he was 11 years old, his father brought him to see a bespoke tailor in Madrid named Jaime Gallo. Gallo made the King's clothes using traditional methods: he measured the King's body and then used those measurements to draft a paper pattern from scratch. This pattern, which serves as the garment's architectural blueprint, is used to mark and cut the cloth. The pieces are then roughly basted together into a wearable fitting garment. When the King tries on this garment, the tailor takes notes on what needs to be changed, deconstructs the garment, and makes the necessary adjustment. This process repeats three times — basted, forward, and final fitting — with each step bringing the garment to its final form. This is partly why the King's clothes fit so beautifully: they were made by a skilled tailor and refined through multiple fittings. More important, however, is Gallo's technical skill. To be sure, not all tailors are so skilled, which is why I don't recommend going to just any random tailor. Gallo continued making clothes for the King until his own death in 2015. In the first slide, you can see three photos: two of the King wearing Gallo's tailoring at different periods of his life, and a meeting desk at Sastreria Jaime Gallo (Gallo's workshop). Most people today don't wear bespoke clothes. Instead, they wear ready-made clothes produced by manufacturers and sold by brands and retailers. The shrunken silhouette we see today was principally shaped in the early 2000s by three designers: Raf Simons, Hedi Slimane, and Thom Browne. These men were not rebelling against classic tailoring, which has not been culturally relevant since the late 1960s. Instead, they were rebelling against the oversized tailoring of the '80s and '90s, which was also created by designers (such as Armani). In the 2012 documentary "Antifashion," Simons explains that he felt oversized silhouettes were "too American" and "macho" (think Arnold Schwarzenegger). He wanted something that felt younger, more European, and made for thin, effete bodies. Slimane echoed this sentiment in a separate interview, saying that he felt bullied as a teen for not being very muscular, so he intentionally wanted to design things that felt more androgynous. He rejected the idea that every man needed to feel big and macho. Whatever you want to say about the shrunken suit trend, there were no technical issues with the original versions. Along the top row of the second slide, you can see two suits by Slimane and Browne. Notice that there's no puckering or pulling. The collar hugs the neck. I also think the clothes look pretty good on the models. This is largely because there are still people with technical knowledge working at this stage. The problems arise once those designs slide further away from such people. On the bottom row of the second slide, we can see Lionel Messi wearing a Thom Browne suit. IMO, it doesn't fit him as well as the model above him because he's a more muscular build. The original slim suits work best on thin figures with shoulders broader than the hips. Once you put these clothes on different figures, they can look egg-shaped. This mismatch can happen for all sorts of reasons. The people involved in selling or styling clothes today often lack technical skills: editors, writers, stylists, salespeople, marketers, and such. The designer was already one step removed from the tailor (a technical person), but at least they can work with a pattern maker (another technical person). Many people today are another step removed from that technical layer. Conor McGregor's clothes are from his own line, August McGregor, which he created with David August. Although David August works in custom clothing, he's not a tailor. He measures clients and sends those measurements to an overseas factory, where garments are produced by people who never meet the wearer. Conor's role is simply to market the product. He's a built-in influencer for the brand. There was a recent Wall Street Journal article about the emergence of "muscle suits," which is to say, very bulky guys wearing slim-fit tailoring. IMO, this can only emerge from the history we talked about. As more people lack technical skills and more layers or barriers exist between them and people with technical skills, the garment can look more distorted or strange. On the final slide, we see a video from Brimble and Clark, an custom tailoring company mentioned in the WSJ article. Like those from August McGregor, these are made-to-measure clothes produced in distant factories, though they use more stretch blends. Someone once told me that the owner of Brimble and Clark holds a ceremony when he delivers a suit to you. When you come into the shop to pick up your suit, a painting is mechanically lowered to reveal a collection of tiny knives. The company owner takes one of the tiny knives, sews it behind your lapel, and then ceremoniously puts the jacket on you. Then it's time for your own private photoshoot, where you get to pose around Chesterfield field couches while wearing your jacket concealing a tiny knife. The purpose, of course, is simply to make the wearer feel good. The business person understands something important: how a customer feels is more important than whether the product is good. This is essentially the system we have today. The company owner, salesperson, fitter, customer, writer, and influencer often possess little technical knowledge. The remaining expertise is concentrated among pattern makers and garment workers at the very end of the supply chain. I think about this sometimes when I read about AI, as I think it represents yet another step towards the deskilling of labor. Perhaps one day, someone who knows how to draw with pen and paper will look at an AI-generated image and recognize certain distortions that many have come to accept. But AI is outside my area of expertise, so I'll leave that discussion to others.
0:25

No, I don't think so. I think Conor McGregor's tailoring is best understood in the context of how labor has been deskilled for almost 200 years. Let me explain. Before the mid-19th century, most men who were not manual laborers wore bespoke clothes. In other words, their clothes were made specifically for them, typically by women working in the home or by bespoke tailors. This is how the King of Spain gets his clothes. When he was 11 years old, his father brought him to see a bespoke tailor in Madrid named Jaime Gallo. Gallo made the King's clothes using traditional methods: he measured the King's body and then used those measurements to draft a paper pattern from scratch. This pattern, which serves as the garment's architectural blueprint, is used to mark and cut the cloth. The pieces are then roughly basted together into a wearable fitting garment. When the King tries on this garment, the tailor takes notes on what needs to be changed, deconstructs the garment, and makes the necessary adjustment. This process repeats three times — basted, forward, and final fitting — with each step bringing the garment to its final form. This is partly why the King's clothes fit so beautifully: they were made by a skilled tailor and refined through multiple fittings. More important, however, is Gallo's technical skill. To be sure, not all tailors are so skilled, which is why I don't recommend going to just any random tailor. Gallo continued making clothes for the King until his own death in 2015. In the first slide, you can see three photos: two of the King wearing Gallo's tailoring at different periods of his life, and a meeting desk at Sastreria Jaime Gallo (Gallo's workshop). Most people today don't wear bespoke clothes. Instead, they wear ready-made clothes produced by manufacturers and sold by brands and retailers. The shrunken silhouette we see today was principally shaped in the early 2000s by three designers: Raf Simons, Hedi Slimane, and Thom Browne. These men were not rebelling against classic tailoring, which has not been culturally relevant since the late 1960s. Instead, they were rebelling against the oversized tailoring of the '80s and '90s, which was also created by designers (such as Armani). In the 2012 documentary "Antifashion," Simons explains that he felt oversized silhouettes were "too American" and "macho" (think Arnold Schwarzenegger). He wanted something that felt younger, more European, and made for thin, effete bodies. Slimane echoed this sentiment in a separate interview, saying that he felt bullied as a teen for not being very muscular, so he intentionally wanted to design things that felt more androgynous. He rejected the idea that every man needed to feel big and macho. Whatever you want to say about the shrunken suit trend, there were no technical issues with the original versions. Along the top row of the second slide, you can see two suits by Slimane and Browne. Notice that there's no puckering or pulling. The collar hugs the neck. I also think the clothes look pretty good on the models. This is largely because there are still people with technical knowledge working at this stage. The problems arise once those designs slide further away from such people. On the bottom row of the second slide, we can see Lionel Messi wearing a Thom Browne suit. IMO, it doesn't fit him as well as the model above him because he's a more muscular build. The original slim suits work best on thin figures with shoulders broader than the hips. Once you put these clothes on different figures, they can look egg-shaped. This mismatch can happen for all sorts of reasons. The people involved in selling or styling clothes today often lack technical skills: editors, writers, stylists, salespeople, marketers, and such. The designer was already one step removed from the tailor (a technical person), but at least they can work with a pattern maker (another technical person). Many people today are another step removed from that technical layer. Conor McGregor's clothes are from his own line, August McGregor, which he created with David August. Although David August works in custom clothing, he's not a tailor. He measures clients and sends those measurements to an overseas factory, where garments are produced by people who never meet the wearer. Conor's role is simply to market the product. He's a built-in influencer for the brand. There was a recent Wall Street Journal article about the emergence of "muscle suits," which is to say, very bulky guys wearing slim-fit tailoring. IMO, this can only emerge from the history we talked about. As more people lack technical skills and more layers or barriers exist between them and people with technical skills, the garment can look more distorted or strange. On the final slide, we see a video from Brimble and Clark, an custom tailoring company mentioned in the WSJ article. Like those from August McGregor, these are made-to-measure clothes produced in distant factories, though they use more stretch blends. Someone once told me that the owner of Brimble and Clark holds a ceremony when he delivers a suit to you. When you come into the shop to pick up your suit, a painting is mechanically lowered to reveal a collection of tiny knives. The company owner takes one of the tiny knives, sews it behind your lapel, and then ceremoniously puts the jacket on you. Then it's time for your own private photoshoot, where you get to pose around Chesterfield field couches while wearing your jacket concealing a tiny knife. The purpose, of course, is simply to make the wearer feel good. The business person understands something important: how a customer feels is more important than whether the product is good. This is essentially the system we have today. The company owner, salesperson, fitter, customer, writer, and influencer often possess little technical knowledge. The remaining expertise is concentrated among pattern makers and garment workers at the very end of the supply chain. I think about this sometimes when I read about AI, as I think it represents yet another step towards the deskilling of labor. Perhaps one day, someone who knows how to draw with pen and paper will look at an AI-generated image and recognize certain distortions that many have come to accept. But AI is outside my area of expertise, so I'll leave that discussion to others.

derek guy

280,017 次观看 • 2 个月前

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

798,882 次观看 • 2 年前