正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Two different ways to break through. Same end result. Danilo 🆚 Middlesbrough - Thirty-Six Passes. Patience. Passing. Purpose. Gassama 🆚 Panathinaikos - Three Passes. Precision. Pace. Power.

Rangers Football Club

796,677 subscribers

351,535 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Don't settle for second, get ready to aim for greatness 🏆 Year 2 of #PGATOUR2K25 is bringing you more power, more precision, and more competition. Three additional Seasons, new Clubhouse Passes, and expanded content mean more ways to climb the ranks and elevate your game.

Don't settle for second, get ready to aim for greatness 🏆 Year 2 of #PGATOUR2K25 is bringing you more power, more precision, and more competition. Three additional Seasons, new Clubhouse Passes, and expanded content mean more ways to climb the ranks and elevate your game.

#PGATOUR2K25

33,253 次观看 • 7 个月前

FC BARCELONA POSSESSION 🔥 Two teams battle to control the ball while using the goalkeepers in the end zones and a central neutral player to create overloads. Complete six passes and then score in one of two ways. The team in possession can attack any of the four mini goals. ⚽ First time finish from a goalkeeper’s pass equals two points ⚽ Any other first time finish equals one point Lose possession and the roles switch instantly. KEY COACHING POINTS: ✅ Create width and depth ✅ Play with an open body shape ✅ Scan before receiving ✅ Use quick and accurate passing ✅ Support underneath and beyond the ball ✅ Use the neutral players effectively ✅ Stay patient in possession ✅ Time your runs towards the mini goals ✅ Counter press immediately after losing possession This practice demands technical quality and fast decision making🔵🔴 #FCBarcelona #FootballTraining #PossessionGame #SoccerCoaching #PreSeason2026

FC BARCELONA POSSESSION 🔥 Two teams battle to control the ball while using the goalkeepers in the end zones and a central neutral player to create overloads. Complete six passes and then score in one of two ways. The team in possession can attack any of the four mini goals. ⚽ First time finish from a goalkeeper’s pass equals two points ⚽ Any other first time finish equals one point Lose possession and the roles switch instantly. KEY COACHING POINTS: ✅ Create width and depth ✅ Play with an open body shape ✅ Scan before receiving ✅ Use quick and accurate passing ✅ Support underneath and beyond the ball ✅ Use the neutral players effectively ✅ Stay patient in possession ✅ Time your runs towards the mini goals ✅ Counter press immediately after losing possession This practice demands technical quality and fast decision making🔵🔴 #FCBarcelona #FootballTraining #PossessionGame #SoccerCoaching #PreSeason2026

Keepitonthedeck

13,198 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Arsenal training this week featured this possession practice. 📐 Area: 14 x 14 yards A fast, competitive 5v3 possession game: ✅ Quick combination play ✅ Scanning and awareness ✅ Passing angles ✅ Pressing intensity ✅ Immediate reactions in transition ⚫️⚫️ In possession: Complete two passes through two different gates to score into the mini target goals. 🟡🟡 Out of possession: Regain the ball and attack the mini goals immediately. 🔥 Key coaching points: • Create clear passing angles • Maintain width and depth • Scan before receiving • Receive with an open body shape • Press together with intensity • React instantly when possession changes • Attack quickly after winning the ball 📌 Save this practice 🔁 Share it ➕ Follow us for more training sessions #FootballCoaching #SoccerCoaching #Arsenal #PossessionDrill #FootballTraining #SoccerTraining #CoachingDrills #FootballCoach #PlayerDevelopment #CoachDevelopment #FootballSession

🚨 Arsenal training this week featured this possession practice. 📐 Area: 14 x 14 yards A fast, competitive 5v3 possession game: ✅ Quick combination play ✅ Scanning and awareness ✅ Passing angles ✅ Pressing intensity ✅ Immediate reactions in transition ⚫️⚫️ In possession: Complete two passes through two different gates to score into the mini target goals. 🟡🟡 Out of possession: Regain the ball and attack the mini goals immediately. 🔥 Key coaching points: • Create clear passing angles • Maintain width and depth • Scan before receiving • Receive with an open body shape • Press together with intensity • React instantly when possession changes • Attack quickly after winning the ball 📌 Save this practice 🔁 Share it ➕ Follow us for more training sessions #FootballCoaching #SoccerCoaching #Arsenal #PossessionDrill #FootballTraining #SoccerTraining #CoachingDrills #FootballCoach #PlayerDevelopment #CoachDevelopment #FootballSession

Keepitonthedeck

22,169 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Dylan Patel lays out how we know the hard upper bound on how much compute can be produced annually by 2030: around 200 GW/year. That’s a crazy number (there’s about 20 GW of AI deployed in the world right now), but it’s nowhere near enough to satisfy Sam/Elon/Dario/Demis’s ambitions. Lots of things in the supply chain can be scaled up over 4 years, including things that other people think are bottlenecks, like datacenter power or fab clean room space. But the thing that’s inflexible over that timeline is the number of EUV tools. Dylan forecasts that production of ASML’s EUV tools will scale from 60 per year now to about 100 per year by the end of the decade - which means something like 700 total machines running in 2030. For a fab to make a GW worth of the Rubin chips that NVIDIA is deploying later this year, it needs to make 55,000 3nm wafers, 6,000 5nm wafers, and 170,000 memory wafers. Each 3nm wafers needs about 20 EUV passes, so about 1.1 million passes per GW. Adding on 5nm and memory, you need two million passes. Each tool can do 75 passes per hour, so with 90% uptime that’s around 600k passes per year - so a single machine can make less than a third of a GW in a year. So in 2030, we have 700 total machines, each making 0.3ish GW a year, which means we can produce 200 GW of compute a year. That’s a lot. But Sam Altman wants a gigawatt a week by the end of the decade. Anthropic and Google will be wanting about the same. And Elon wants to be putting 100 GW in space every year. Any one of these players could maybe get what they need, but not all of them.

.Dylan Patel lays out how we know the hard upper bound on how much compute can be produced annually by 2030: around 200 GW/year. That’s a crazy number (there’s about 20 GW of AI deployed in the world right now), but it’s nowhere near enough to satisfy Sam/Elon/Dario/Demis’s ambitions. Lots of things in the supply chain can be scaled up over 4 years, including things that other people think are bottlenecks, like datacenter power or fab clean room space. But the thing that’s inflexible over that timeline is the number of EUV tools. Dylan forecasts that production of ASML’s EUV tools will scale from 60 per year now to about 100 per year by the end of the decade - which means something like 700 total machines running in 2030. For a fab to make a GW worth of the Rubin chips that NVIDIA is deploying later this year, it needs to make 55,000 3nm wafers, 6,000 5nm wafers, and 170,000 memory wafers. Each 3nm wafers needs about 20 EUV passes, so about 1.1 million passes per GW. Adding on 5nm and memory, you need two million passes. Each tool can do 75 passes per hour, so with 90% uptime that’s around 600k passes per year - so a single machine can make less than a third of a GW in a year. So in 2030, we have 700 total machines, each making 0.3ish GW a year, which means we can produce 200 GW of compute a year. That’s a lot. But Sam Altman wants a gigawatt a week by the end of the decade. Anthropic and Google will be wanting about the same. And Elon wants to be putting 100 GW in space every year. Any one of these players could maybe get what they need, but not all of them.

Dwarkesh Patel

114,538 次观看 • 6 个月前

The most expensive sentence in history was written in a book margin in 1637. "I have a truly marvelous proof, which this margin is too narrow to contain." Nobody found that proof for 358 years. Fermat's claim was so simple a kid gets it: no three whole numbers solve xⁿ + yⁿ = zⁿ once n passes 2. That one line beat every genius who touched it for three centuries. Andrew Wiles finally closed it in 1994. But he never attacked Fermat directly. He proved something stranger and much bigger - that two fields nobody thought were related are secretly the same field. y² = x³ + ax + b That's an elliptic curve, from number theory. A modular form comes from the opposite end of math - symmetry, complex analysis. For a century the two were studied by separate people who never spoke. Wiles proved they're the same object in two disguises. Fermat just fell off the bridge on the way. Now the part the documentary skips. Those same elliptic curves guard your bank login, your messages, every Bitcoin wallet alive. The famous problem was never where the treasure sat. Wiles on the seven years it took him to see it: "You enter the first room of the mansion and it's completely dark... after six months or so, you find the light switch, you turn it on, and suddenly it's all illuminated."

The most expensive sentence in history was written in a book margin in 1637. "I have a truly marvelous proof, which this margin is too narrow to contain." Nobody found that proof for 358 years. Fermat's claim was so simple a kid gets it: no three whole numbers solve xⁿ + yⁿ = zⁿ once n passes 2. That one line beat every genius who touched it for three centuries. Andrew Wiles finally closed it in 1994. But he never attacked Fermat directly. He proved something stranger and much bigger - that two fields nobody thought were related are secretly the same field. y² = x³ + ax + b That's an elliptic curve, from number theory. A modular form comes from the opposite end of math - symmetry, complex analysis. For a century the two were studied by separate people who never spoke. Wiles proved they're the same object in two disguises. Fermat just fell off the bridge on the way. Now the part the documentary skips. Those same elliptic curves guard your bank login, your messages, every Bitcoin wallet alive. The famous problem was never where the treasure sat. Wiles on the seven years it took him to see it: "You enter the first room of the mansion and it's completely dark... after six months or so, you find the light switch, you turn it on, and suddenly it's all illuminated."

Veles

20,624 次观看 • 8 天前

⚽ SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR COACHES TO TAKE INTO THEIR OWN TRAINING Newcastle United used this possession and counter pressing rondo in training yesterday morning, but there was one detail that made the practice interesting. The setup was a 6v3 inside a 9 x 9 yard area. The six possession players looked to circulate the ball under pressure and, after completing six or more passes, could score into one of the mini target goals. The three pressing players had a simple objective. Win it and score quickly. But here was the twist 👇 At ANY moment, the coach could serve a new ball directly into the three pressing players. Immediately, the mentality of the six players had to change. From possession to aggressive counter press. No warning. No predictable trigger. Just instant reaction. The six players had to recognise the transition, sprint to reduce space, lock onto the nearest options, protect the target goals and prevent the three players from escaping or getting an early shot away. Counter pressing moments in matches are rarely scripted. Players lose possession in different areas, from different actions and in different body positions. The coach serving the ball creates unpredictable transition moments and forces the players to develop the habit of reacting immediately rather than waiting for the picture to become comfortable. The key behaviours coaches can demand: 🔥 Immediate reaction on the transition 🔥 Sprint to reduce time and space 🔥 Nearest player applies aggressive pressure 🔥 Supporting players lock onto passing options 🔥 Protect the direct route to goal 🔥 Force play away from the most dangerous space 🔥 Hunt collectively rather than pressing individually 🔥 Regain possession and immediately secure the next action A simple rondo with a really intelligent constraint. Possession. Transition. Counter press. Game realism. All inside one practice. For coach education videos, training videos and much more, access the member area on our website.

⚽ SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR COACHES TO TAKE INTO THEIR OWN TRAINING Newcastle United used this possession and counter pressing rondo in training yesterday morning, but there was one detail that made the practice interesting. The setup was a 6v3 inside a 9 x 9 yard area. The six possession players looked to circulate the ball under pressure and, after completing six or more passes, could score into one of the mini target goals. The three pressing players had a simple objective. Win it and score quickly. But here was the twist 👇 At ANY moment, the coach could serve a new ball directly into the three pressing players. Immediately, the mentality of the six players had to change. From possession to aggressive counter press. No warning. No predictable trigger. Just instant reaction. The six players had to recognise the transition, sprint to reduce space, lock onto the nearest options, protect the target goals and prevent the three players from escaping or getting an early shot away. Counter pressing moments in matches are rarely scripted. Players lose possession in different areas, from different actions and in different body positions. The coach serving the ball creates unpredictable transition moments and forces the players to develop the habit of reacting immediately rather than waiting for the picture to become comfortable. The key behaviours coaches can demand: 🔥 Immediate reaction on the transition 🔥 Sprint to reduce time and space 🔥 Nearest player applies aggressive pressure 🔥 Supporting players lock onto passing options 🔥 Protect the direct route to goal 🔥 Force play away from the most dangerous space 🔥 Hunt collectively rather than pressing individually 🔥 Regain possession and immediately secure the next action A simple rondo with a really intelligent constraint. Possession. Transition. Counter press. Game realism. All inside one practice. For coach education videos, training videos and much more, access the member area on our website.

Keepitonthedeck

51,665 次观看 • 6 天前

If this canal gets built, every supply chain on Earth gets rewritten. And the price you pay for everything gets recalculated. Here's what the Ben Gurion Canal actually means for you: Right now, 12% of global trade flows through the Suez Canal. Every pair of sneakers. Every phone. Every car part. Every piece of furniture shipped from Asia to Europe passes through one 193 km Egyptian chokepoint. And that chokepoint keeps breaking. → March 2021: One ship got stuck. Six days. $9,600,000,000 in trade per day halted. → Late 2023: Houthi missiles started targeting Red Sea shipping. Hundreds of vessels rerouted around Africa. → Result: Your shipping costs spiked. Your delivery times stretched. Your inflation went up. Israel's answer? Carve a brand-new 250+ km canal straight through the Negev desert. Red Sea to the Mediterranean. Under Israeli control. No Egypt. No Houthi threat. No Ever Given repeat. The idea has been on the table since 1963. A declassified U.S. memo from that year explored nuclear excavation to build it. Estimated cost today: $55,000,000,000+. Insane? Yes. But here's why it matters to you personally: → If this canal opens, Egypt loses its leverage over global trade overnight → Shipping companies get a second route — competition drives your costs down → Israel becomes one of the most strategically important nations on Earth → The countries that own stakes in this route own a piece of every shipment between Asia and Europe The Suez Canal made Egypt a geopolitical power for 70 years. The Ben Gurion Canal would do the same for Israel. And every time a container ship passes through it — you pay less. Or you pay more if it never gets built and the current chokepoints keep breaking. Either way, this affects your wallet. Most people have no idea what's coming… I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🇨🇳 Liu Feng 刘锋

36,366 次观看 • 4 个月前

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England v Argentina 🇦🇷: Pre-Match Analysis Spain awaits the winner but this tie needs zero billing & in it's own right with both teams ready to go to war and attack their way to the final: - Argentina are the Highest Scorers - England have missed the most Big Chances England - 13th Best Passers at the WC; More Direct and with Purpose: - 6.7 Shots on Target per 90 - 15 Big Chances Missed (2nd) Unlocking Argentina from Wide Areas - 6 Accurate Crosses per Match (3rd) > Kane v DR Congo > Underlapping Run for Kane v Panama > Bellingham v Mexico Transition Attacks from Deep or Pressing - Lowest Ave. Possession of Semi-Finalists & prefer to break on teams quickly: > Bellingham v Croatia > Bellingham v Mexico x2 Argentina - Highest Scorers with 2.8 Goals per 90 - Highest Accurate Passers - 2 Clean Sheets (14th) Unlocking England Centrally - Accurate Passing but with Purpose and using "Vertical Play" to break teams open through centre: > Messi v Saudi > Messi v Austria Transition from Low into Attack - Not a team that stand out with Pace but with willingness to do hard running > Enzo Fernandez v Egypt > Enzo and Messi v Austria Key Battles/Decisive Areas - England have to improve their distances in Midfield without the ball & watch for those Vertical Passes into Messi/Enzo/Alvarez that can get Argentina straight onto the Defence - Bellingham v Paredes: I could see a scenario where Paredes follows Bellingham around the pitch and sacrifices himself and the structure to protect against their star. - Messi Freedom: I am unsure how you cope with this because as he will float between Guehi(CB) and O'Reilly(LB) then deeper into midfield, it becomes about communication to pass on but that is risky. Let's F*cking Gooo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England v Argentina 🇦🇷: Pre-Match Analysis Spain awaits the winner but this tie needs zero billing & in it's own right with both teams ready to go to war and attack their way to the final: - Argentina are the Highest Scorers - England have missed the most Big Chances England - 13th Best Passers at the WC; More Direct and with Purpose: - 6.7 Shots on Target per 90 - 15 Big Chances Missed (2nd) Unlocking Argentina from Wide Areas - 6 Accurate Crosses per Match (3rd) > Kane v DR Congo > Underlapping Run for Kane v Panama > Bellingham v Mexico Transition Attacks from Deep or Pressing - Lowest Ave. Possession of Semi-Finalists & prefer to break on teams quickly: > Bellingham v Croatia > Bellingham v Mexico x2 Argentina - Highest Scorers with 2.8 Goals per 90 - Highest Accurate Passers - 2 Clean Sheets (14th) Unlocking England Centrally - Accurate Passing but with Purpose and using "Vertical Play" to break teams open through centre: > Messi v Saudi > Messi v Austria Transition from Low into Attack - Not a team that stand out with Pace but with willingness to do hard running > Enzo Fernandez v Egypt > Enzo and Messi v Austria Key Battles/Decisive Areas - England have to improve their distances in Midfield without the ball & watch for those Vertical Passes into Messi/Enzo/Alvarez that can get Argentina straight onto the Defence - Bellingham v Paredes: I could see a scenario where Paredes follows Bellingham around the pitch and sacrifices himself and the structure to protect against their star. - Messi Freedom: I am unsure how you cope with this because as he will float between Guehi(CB) and O'Reilly(LB) then deeper into midfield, it becomes about communication to pass on but that is risky. Let's F*cking Gooo

John Walker

92,012 次观看 • 1 个月前

MY NOSE BROKE… Again. As most of you know, I’ve broken my nose more times than I can count. The first major break was so severe the doctor told me it was one of the worst he’d ever seen. It required two surgeries just to put it back together, and I was strongly advised to never let it get hit again. I didn’t listen. It broke again. Another surgery. And honestly… it never healed the way it should’ve. Over time, the trauma caused scar tissue to take over, leaving me with a nose that didn’t function properly and didn’t look right either. So for the final time, I trusted Dr. Jay Calvert to take on what was basically a reconstruction job — reducing the scar tissue, restoring proper breathing, and rebuilding the structure from the inside out. Surgery was a success. Now it’s a full year of recovery before we see the final result. Grateful to Dr. Calvert and his entire team for the care, precision, and patience through this process. 🙏 Onward.

MY NOSE BROKE… Again. As most of you know, I’ve broken my nose more times than I can count. The first major break was so severe the doctor told me it was one of the worst he’d ever seen. It required two surgeries just to put it back together, and I was strongly advised to never let it get hit again. I didn’t listen. It broke again. Another surgery. And honestly… it never healed the way it should’ve. Over time, the trauma caused scar tissue to take over, leaving me with a nose that didn’t function properly and didn’t look right either. So for the final time, I trusted Dr. Jay Calvert to take on what was basically a reconstruction job — reducing the scar tissue, restoring proper breathing, and rebuilding the structure from the inside out. Surgery was a success. Now it’s a full year of recovery before we see the final result. Grateful to Dr. Calvert and his entire team for the care, precision, and patience through this process. 🙏 Onward.

FOUSEY

90,903 次观看 • 8 个月前

$Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.$

Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.

Teddy - PolyBackTest.com

317,912 次观看 • 1 个月前

$Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.$

Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.

Dustin

21,757,183 次观看 • 5 个月前

This guy turned Grok Bot into an MM system and it made $1,335 a day The result is already +$65,425 PnL with only $40 per average trade while repeating the same setup 9 times every hour across BTC "Up or Down" markets Six AI agents work together as one algorithm: 1. They try to build Up + Down < 100¢ The bot accumulates both outcomes at different moments as BTC moves For example: Down at 38¢ + Up later at 56¢ = 94¢ total cost (6¢ locked on every complete set) The two entries do not need to happen at the same time 2. Order Flow tells the agents which side to accumulate next The model tracks imbalance inside the book: OBI = (B - A) / (B + A) When buying pressure shifts toward one outcome, its fair probability changes and the bot adjusts which side it wants to accumulate This trader’s Polymarket account: GoodFallen 10,322 predictions with a 50% win rate Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $974 → $2,525 (+$1,551) $723 → $1,923 (+$1,200) $1,270 → $2,323 (+$1,053) The bot uses changes in Order Flow and BTC price to keep rebuilding the same position before resolution

This guy turned Grok Bot into an MM system and it made $1,335 a day The result is already +$65,425 PnL with only $40 per average trade while repeating the same setup 9 times every hour across BTC "Up or Down" markets Six AI agents work together as one algorithm: 1. They try to build Up + Down < 100¢ The bot accumulates both outcomes at different moments as BTC moves For example: Down at 38¢ + Up later at 56¢ = 94¢ total cost (6¢ locked on every complete set) The two entries do not need to happen at the same time 2. Order Flow tells the agents which side to accumulate next The model tracks imbalance inside the book: OBI = (B - A) / (B + A) When buying pressure shifts toward one outcome, its fair probability changes and the bot adjusts which side it wants to accumulate This trader’s Polymarket account: GoodFallen 10,322 predictions with a 50% win rate Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $974 → $2,525 (+$1,551) $723 → $1,923 (+$1,200) $1,270 → $2,323 (+$1,053) The bot uses changes in Order Flow and BTC price to keep rebuilding the same position before resolution

Daniro

19,469 次观看 • 6 天前

With a keffiyeh and in front of customers: This is how the workers of the Israeli ‘Breads bakery’ in New York announced their union. In a video published in the last few days , documenting a confrontation with the company's Israeli owners , The workers turn to one of the owners inside the branch, asking if he knows the conditions under which they work and if he even "knows how to make a croissant?" At the same time, the workers are also demanding an end to "support for the Israeli occupation" and a ban on baking cookies with Israeli symbols According to the workers, since they filmed the video about two weeks ago, the owners "spend most of their hours in the bakery", wandering among the babka shelves, tearing union flyers from the walls of the break room after the end of shifts, and have even hired external consultants who hold meetings with the staff and spread "lies about unions in three different languages". Ad The group, which calls itself Breaking Breads, describes the management's behavior as "a mask of friendship that hides fear," adding in a cookbook tone: "Their power melts as easily as a badly cut almond croissant."

With a keffiyeh and in front of customers: This is how the workers of the Israeli ‘Breads bakery’ in New York announced their union. In a video published in the last few days , documenting a confrontation with the company's Israeli owners , The workers turn to one of the owners inside the branch, asking if he knows the conditions under which they work and if he even "knows how to make a croissant?" At the same time, the workers are also demanding an end to "support for the Israeli occupation" and a ban on baking cookies with Israeli symbols According to the workers, since they filmed the video about two weeks ago, the owners "spend most of their hours in the bakery", wandering among the babka shelves, tearing union flyers from the walls of the break room after the end of shifts, and have even hired external consultants who hold meetings with the staff and spread "lies about unions in three different languages". Ad The group, which calls itself Breaking Breads, describes the management's behavior as "a mask of friendship that hides fear," adding in a cookbook tone: "Their power melts as easily as a badly cut almond croissant."

Iris

19,580 次观看 • 7 个月前

BREAKING: The Earth experienced four significant earthquakes within hours of each other. - Magnitude 5.6 — Northern California - Magnitude 7.2 — Venezuela - Magnitude 7.5 — Venezuela (39 seconds later) - Magnitude 6.9 — Offshore Japan Four significant earthquakes hit the planet on June 24. 8:10 a.m. PT; a M5.6 struck Redwood Valley, California. Shelves cleared, power cut to thousands, no deaths. While earthquakes in different parts of the world are usually unrelated because they occur on separate fault systems, it's uncommon to see this many major seismic events unfold in such a short window. Seven hours after the first quake hit California, northern Venezuela was hit by something far rarer: a doublet. A M7.2 ruptured, and 39 seconds later a M7.5 tore through the same stretch of coast; the strongest quake to hit the country in 125 years. Buildings pancaked across Caracas. The main airport closed. USGS warns of casualties in the thousands. Twenty-six minutes later, a M6.9 struck offshore of Kuji, Japan. No tsunami, no damage. Three unrelated faults, three corners of the world, one day; and no, they aren't connected. But Venezuela? two magnitude-7 quakes in 39 seconds, striking a country already in crisis, with power and internet collapsing across Caracas at the exact moment it needed to coordinate a rescue. Follow Brian Allen to stay ahead of the curve.

BREAKING: The Earth experienced four significant earthquakes within hours of each other. - Magnitude 5.6 — Northern California - Magnitude 7.2 — Venezuela - Magnitude 7.5 — Venezuela (39 seconds later) - Magnitude 6.9 — Offshore Japan Four significant earthquakes hit the planet on June 24. 8:10 a.m. PT; a M5.6 struck Redwood Valley, California. Shelves cleared, power cut to thousands, no deaths. While earthquakes in different parts of the world are usually unrelated because they occur on separate fault systems, it's uncommon to see this many major seismic events unfold in such a short window. Seven hours after the first quake hit California, northern Venezuela was hit by something far rarer: a doublet. A M7.2 ruptured, and 39 seconds later a M7.5 tore through the same stretch of coast; the strongest quake to hit the country in 125 years. Buildings pancaked across Caracas. The main airport closed. USGS warns of casualties in the thousands. Twenty-six minutes later, a M6.9 struck offshore of Kuji, Japan. No tsunami, no damage. Three unrelated faults, three corners of the world, one day; and no, they aren't connected. But Venezuela? two magnitude-7 quakes in 39 seconds, striking a country already in crisis, with power and internet collapsing across Caracas at the exact moment it needed to coordinate a rescue. Follow Brian Allen to stay ahead of the curve.

Brian Allen

160,128 次观看 • 2 个月前

THIS GUY BUILT A 24/7 AI COMPANY WITH 7 AGENTS THAT CHECKS 48 TIMES A DAY, PICKS ITS OWN TASKS AND KEEPS WORKING WHILE HE SLEEPS 00:05 the map shows agents moving between the marketplace, research lab and command center, with each one handling a different job inside the same shared system the setup runs on 4 core layers: automatic triggers, shared memory, connected tools and an isolated verifier that checks every result before the next step starts each cycle reads the last 10 log entries, updates open tasks, saves new signals and passes the context forward, so the next agent never starts from zero one agent researches, two execute, another monitors outcomes and a read-only checker reviews the work independently, allowing several workflows to run in parallel without breaking the system bookmark this before everyone stops prompting one agent at a time and starts building AI teams that work, learn and improve around the clock

THIS GUY BUILT A 24/7 AI COMPANY WITH 7 AGENTS THAT CHECKS 48 TIMES A DAY, PICKS ITS OWN TASKS AND KEEPS WORKING WHILE HE SLEEPS 00:05 the map shows agents moving between the marketplace, research lab and command center, with each one handling a different job inside the same shared system the setup runs on 4 core layers: automatic triggers, shared memory, connected tools and an isolated verifier that checks every result before the next step starts each cycle reads the last 10 log entries, updates open tasks, saves new signals and passes the context forward, so the next agent never starts from zero one agent researches, two execute, another monitors outcomes and a read-only checker reviews the work independently, allowing several workflows to run in parallel without breaking the system bookmark this before everyone stops prompting one agent at a time and starts building AI teams that work, learn and improve around the clock

Gipp 🦅

19,071 次观看 • 2 个月前

Gilbert Strang taught linear algebra at MIT for fifty years. His last lecture is on YouTube. It has fewer views than his worst lecture. Nobody told students it was the last one. He just walked in, said "the final class in linear algebra at MIT," and started reviewing old exams. Google built a $2,000,000,000,000 company on one concept from this course. He is 88 years old. He still answers emails. This is MIT 18.06. Linear Algebra. The most watched mathematics course in history. Then the Markov matrix. Strang writes a transition matrix on the board. Three states. People moving between them every step. After enough steps - the system locks into a steady state that never changes. That steady state is an eigenvector. Google's PageRank works the same way. Websites are states. Clicks are transitions. The importance of every page on the internet is one eigenvector of one enormous matrix. Then least squares. Three data points. No line passes through all three. So you find the line that minimizes total error. That is how every AI model on earth is trained - including the ones running inside Goldman Sachs trading desks. Then the projection. The closest point on a plane to a vector outside it. Strang draws it in 30 seconds. That same operation is how Netflix decides what to recommend to 280,000,000 subscribers. Watch the moment he gives back the final exam answer and asks students to work backwards to the question - the room solves it in silence faster than any other lecture all semester. A software engineer told me 18.06 was the course that got her from $90,000 to $200,000 in two years. Same company. Different title. Bookmark this and watch later - after this lecture every dataset you touch will feel like a geometry problem waiting to be solved. MIT 18.06 Lecture 34 | Linear Algebra Final Review | Gilbert Strang

Gilbert Strang taught linear algebra at MIT for fifty years. His last lecture is on YouTube. It has fewer views than his worst lecture. Nobody told students it was the last one. He just walked in, said "the final class in linear algebra at MIT," and started reviewing old exams. Google built a $2,000,000,000,000 company on one concept from this course. He is 88 years old. He still answers emails. This is MIT 18.06. Linear Algebra. The most watched mathematics course in history. Then the Markov matrix. Strang writes a transition matrix on the board. Three states. People moving between them every step. After enough steps - the system locks into a steady state that never changes. That steady state is an eigenvector. Google's PageRank works the same way. Websites are states. Clicks are transitions. The importance of every page on the internet is one eigenvector of one enormous matrix. Then least squares. Three data points. No line passes through all three. So you find the line that minimizes total error. That is how every AI model on earth is trained - including the ones running inside Goldman Sachs trading desks. Then the projection. The closest point on a plane to a vector outside it. Strang draws it in 30 seconds. That same operation is how Netflix decides what to recommend to 280,000,000 subscribers. Watch the moment he gives back the final exam answer and asks students to work backwards to the question - the room solves it in silence faster than any other lecture all semester. A software engineer told me 18.06 was the course that got her from $90,000 to $200,000 in two years. Same company. Different title. Bookmark this and watch later - after this lecture every dataset you touch will feel like a geometry problem waiting to be solved. MIT 18.06 Lecture 34 | Linear Algebra Final Review | Gilbert Strang

Zyphor

56,433 次观看 • 10 天前

4v4 (+2) | Possession vs. Regain and Counter to Goal 🥅. ✅ Aim: ✔️ Regain Possession and Counter Attack Quickly. ✅ Set Up: ✔️ Space: 40 (L) x 30 (W) yards. All players start in one half of the pitch. ✔️Place 2 x mini goals 🥅 at one end of the pitch and 2x mini goals in one half of the pitch in diagonally opposite corners. ✔️⚫️s = Possession Team ✔️🔴s = Regain and Counter Team ✔️🟢s = Support Players for the team with the ball ⚽️. ✅ Scoring: ✔️ ⚫️s connect 5 passes or play a wall pass around a player = 1 goal ✔️🔴s regain the ball and 1️⃣ break into the other half and score quickly in a mini goal. Or 2️⃣ connect 4 passes in the half they are in and score in the corner mini goals. ✅ Session Guidance: ➡️ When the 🔴s break over over the halfway line 3 x of them can attack and 2x ⚫️s can recover to get the ball back into the possession half. (3v2). ➡️ Flip the roles of the teams every 3-5 minutes to allow them to practice possession and counters. ✅ Notes: ✔️ ⚫️s: Try keep the ball using controlled possession- spotting the right time to pause on the ball, play through opponents, or play a wall pass. ✔️ 🔴s: Try to win the ball cleanly using interceptions: THEN: 1️⃣ Counter quickly using forward passing and running 🏃‍♂️ 2️⃣ Secure possession and score in the mini goals in the half where the ball ⚽️ was won. Created On: TacticalPad® #SundayShare #SundayShare Temisan Williams @TheCoachesArea Lloyd Owers @FootballTrnng 205 Academy Conor Edwards Breakthrough Soccer The Sporting Resource Felix Lehmann Brett Godwin

4v4 (+2) | Possession vs. Regain and Counter to Goal 🥅. ✅ Aim: ✔️ Regain Possession and Counter Attack Quickly. ✅ Set Up: ✔️ Space: 40 (L) x 30 (W) yards. All players start in one half of the pitch. ✔️Place 2 x mini goals 🥅 at one end of the pitch and 2x mini goals in one half of the pitch in diagonally opposite corners. ✔️⚫️s = Possession Team ✔️🔴s = Regain and Counter Team ✔️🟢s = Support Players for the team with the ball ⚽️. ✅ Scoring: ✔️ ⚫️s connect 5 passes or play a wall pass around a player = 1 goal ✔️🔴s regain the ball and 1️⃣ break into the other half and score quickly in a mini goal. Or 2️⃣ connect 4 passes in the half they are in and score in the corner mini goals. ✅ Session Guidance: ➡️ When the 🔴s break over over the halfway line 3 x of them can attack and 2x ⚫️s can recover to get the ball back into the possession half. (3v2). ➡️ Flip the roles of the teams every 3-5 minutes to allow them to practice possession and counters. ✅ Notes: ✔️ ⚫️s: Try keep the ball using controlled possession- spotting the right time to pause on the ball, play through opponents, or play a wall pass. ✔️ 🔴s: Try to win the ball cleanly using interceptions: THEN: 1️⃣ Counter quickly using forward passing and running 🏃‍♂️ 2️⃣ Secure possession and score in the mini goals in the half where the ball ⚽️ was won. Created On: TacticalPad® #SundayShare #SundayShare Temisan Williams @TheCoachesArea Lloyd Owers @FootballTrnng 205 Academy Conor Edwards Breakthrough Soccer The Sporting Resource Felix Lehmann Brett Godwin

JUST COACH

12,294 次观看 • 2 年前

Twenty five to thirty thousand years ago a comet of extraordinary scale - with a nucleus estimated at 50 to 60 miles in diameter, possibly larger - was captured into a sub-Jovian orbit, placing it on a trajectory through the inner solar system between the sun and Jupiter. What followed was a process Randall describes as hierarchical breakup - the comet progressively fragmenting over thousands of years into ever smaller cometary nuclei, each successive breakup producing a new generation of debris that spread along the orbital path. The end product of that long fragmentation process is the Taurid meteor stream - the same stream that Earth passes through twice annually and that researchers including Randall have connected to the Younger Dryas impact event. The Taurids are not simply a meteor shower. They are the debris field of one of the largest cometary bodies to enter the inner solar system in human prehistory - a 60 mile wide object whose progressive disintegration over tens of thousands of years seeded the orbital path with fragments ranging from dust to objects capable of causing continent-scale destruction. Randall’s argument is that understanding the origin of the Taurid stream is inseparable from understanding what struck the Earth at the Younger Dryas boundary. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Twenty five to thirty thousand years ago a comet of extraordinary scale - with a nucleus estimated at 50 to 60 miles in diameter, possibly larger - was captured into a sub-Jovian orbit, placing it on a trajectory through the inner solar system between the sun and Jupiter. What followed was a process Randall describes as hierarchical breakup - the comet progressively fragmenting over thousands of years into ever smaller cometary nuclei, each successive breakup producing a new generation of debris that spread along the orbital path. The end product of that long fragmentation process is the Taurid meteor stream - the same stream that Earth passes through twice annually and that researchers including Randall have connected to the Younger Dryas impact event. The Taurids are not simply a meteor shower. They are the debris field of one of the largest cometary bodies to enter the inner solar system in human prehistory - a 60 mile wide object whose progressive disintegration over tens of thousands of years seeded the orbital path with fragments ranging from dust to objects capable of causing continent-scale destruction. Randall’s argument is that understanding the origin of the Taurid stream is inseparable from understanding what struck the Earth at the Younger Dryas boundary. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Randall Carlson

23,010 次观看 • 5 个月前

Market Analyst Tom Luongo says Trump isn't fighting Iran to control the Strait of Hormuz; he's using the Strait to break Europe's ability to finance the Ukraine war. Most people see Iran and Ukraine as two separate conflicts, but Tom thinks they're the same war being fought on different fronts. His argument is that oil is the collateral that underpins the modern economy. The more expensive and uncertain energy becomes, the harder it is for European governments to borrow cheaply, keep their industries competitive, and continue funding Ukraine at the current pace. That's why he thinks the Strait of Hormuz matters so much, because whoever controls the world's most important energy chokepoint also influences the financial foundations that wars are fought on. Trump can't simply announce the end of the Ukraine war, even if he wants to, because too many powerful interests are invested in keeping the conflict going. So instead of attacking the war directly, Tom believes Trump is attacking the economic conditions that make the war possible. He also made one of the interview's boldest claims: Europe has poured so much money into Ukraine because many European leaders expected the war to eventually open the door to Russia's vast natural resources, providing the cash flows needed to justify years of borrowing and military spending. If that never happens, they're left with enormous debts and very few ways to pay them back. Most people think the shortest route to ending the war in Ukraine runs through Kyiv, but Tom thinks it runs through the Strait of Hormuz. And if he's right, we've been looking at the wrong map all along. Tom Luongo

Market Analyst Tom Luongo says Trump isn't fighting Iran to control the Strait of Hormuz; he's using the Strait to break Europe's ability to finance the Ukraine war. Most people see Iran and Ukraine as two separate conflicts, but Tom thinks they're the same war being fought on different fronts. His argument is that oil is the collateral that underpins the modern economy. The more expensive and uncertain energy becomes, the harder it is for European governments to borrow cheaply, keep their industries competitive, and continue funding Ukraine at the current pace. That's why he thinks the Strait of Hormuz matters so much, because whoever controls the world's most important energy chokepoint also influences the financial foundations that wars are fought on. Trump can't simply announce the end of the Ukraine war, even if he wants to, because too many powerful interests are invested in keeping the conflict going. So instead of attacking the war directly, Tom believes Trump is attacking the economic conditions that make the war possible. He also made one of the interview's boldest claims: Europe has poured so much money into Ukraine because many European leaders expected the war to eventually open the door to Russia's vast natural resources, providing the cash flows needed to justify years of borrowing and military spending. If that never happens, they're left with enormous debts and very few ways to pay them back. Most people think the shortest route to ending the war in Ukraine runs through Kyiv, but Tom thinks it runs through the Strait of Hormuz. And if he's right, we've been looking at the wrong map all along. Tom Luongo

Mario Nawfal

348,259 次观看 • 2 个月前