Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

>Two Major Studies which debunked feminist narrative about men >Feminists preferred traditionally masculine men over the feminist men >Wives were disgusted and scared when they saw their husbands crying >Gul & Kupfer (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin): Women who endorse “benevolent sexism” strongly prefer chivalrous, protective, provider-type men >Brené... show more

Ambar

95,330 subscribers

14,104 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Lol, Indian women literally flood social media talking about feeling insecure about their looks and trying their best for validation. Indian feminist women can spread hate on Indian men and support Western men as much as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that Indian women's looks are heavily trolled by Western men only, and it's Indian men who defend the looks of Indian women. Even this "Indian women baddie saar" trend is funded by Indian men. If not for simps, these women wouldn't be behaving like this. Basically, Indian men support Indian women. However, they only get hate from them in return.

Lol, Indian women literally flood social media talking about feeling insecure about their looks and trying their best for validation. Indian feminist women can spread hate on Indian men and support Western men as much as possible, but it doesn't change the fact that Indian women's looks are heavily trolled by Western men only, and it's Indian men who defend the looks of Indian women. Even this "Indian women baddie saar" trend is funded by Indian men. If not for simps, these women wouldn't be behaving like this. Basically, Indian men support Indian women. However, they only get hate from them in return.

︎ ︎venom

13,094 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

They want to make this about a man who doesn’t love his wife. That’s bullshit. This woman wasn’t brave like feminism wants you to believe. She actually broke her vow in marriage, which is why her husband walked out. The women in the thread are all showing disgust for men. 🙄 Feminism is really an anti-men movement This story left out the part that she made a decision without consulting her husband first. They left out the part that no cancer had been detected but she made a decision as if she’s single. Not once talking to her husband or finding out the facts. No one would fault a woman, if she had cancer for saving her life… That’s not what this story is about. It’s about wives disrespecting their husbands and their marriages when they act single, while married. Feminist will make it about how men see women as objects. But that’s not at all the truth. Men who feel disrespected in a marriage….Walk out. That’s the truth. Sharon Stone is a feminist. Alone, single at 68 years of age. That’s the future for feminist because they don’t understand what vows in marriage mean. When you say “I do” you become one with your husband and you don’t make decisions without consulting your husband. She believes in “my body, my choice” which is anti-marriage. Yes, he got up and walked out of the room, because she disrespected him and the marriage, but no one asked him… because no one today cares about men. This is why marriage fails in 2026.

They want to make this about a man who doesn’t love his wife. That’s bullshit. This woman wasn’t brave like feminism wants you to believe. She actually broke her vow in marriage, which is why her husband walked out. The women in the thread are all showing disgust for men. 🙄 Feminism is really an anti-men movement This story left out the part that she made a decision without consulting her husband first. They left out the part that no cancer had been detected but she made a decision as if she’s single. Not once talking to her husband or finding out the facts. No one would fault a woman, if she had cancer for saving her life… That’s not what this story is about. It’s about wives disrespecting their husbands and their marriages when they act single, while married. Feminist will make it about how men see women as objects. But that’s not at all the truth. Men who feel disrespected in a marriage….Walk out. That’s the truth. Sharon Stone is a feminist. Alone, single at 68 years of age. That’s the future for feminist because they don’t understand what vows in marriage mean. When you say “I do” you become one with your husband and you don’t make decisions without consulting your husband. She believes in “my body, my choice” which is anti-marriage. Yes, he got up and walked out of the room, because she disrespected him and the marriage, but no one asked him… because no one today cares about men. This is why marriage fails in 2026.

Gia Macool

16,794 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

While trans activists in the United States are crying about ‘erasure’ because their sex marker on official documents can no longer be falsified, this is what the T has been doing to LGBs, especially lesbians, for years. What about the erasure of lesbian spaces, the corroding of our word to include all and sundry, the declarations that men can be lesbians if they say they are women, vilifying and threatening lesbians who state won’t date men because they are lesbians, and turning up at our events or putting stickers in the women’s bathrooms in gay bars that lesbians “love girl c-ck”? And the erasure of lesbians is from both directions. Not only are these men demanding access to lesbian spaces and into our dating circles, but then lesbians who just like their hair short or prefer to buy clothes from the men’s section, are told they are not women, but are men and pushed down a pipeline towards irreversible changes and surgeries. Many of these lesbians in Belong To were convinced while attending the groups that they were ‘trans’, and therefore ‘straight men’. Luckily most of these lesbians desisted before any hormones or surgeries were taken. But for those who didn’t desist, they are now young women who are taking high dosages of testosterone and have undergone double mastectomies. The worst homophobia or lesbophobia any of the Not All Gays founders have experienced is from people who prop up the T, and demand that we just get over that silly thing called homosexuality and include the opposite sex in everything we do.

While trans activists in the United States are crying about ‘erasure’ because their sex marker on official documents can no longer be falsified, this is what the T has been doing to LGBs, especially lesbians, for years. What about the erasure of lesbian spaces, the corroding of our word to include all and sundry, the declarations that men can be lesbians if they say they are women, vilifying and threatening lesbians who state won’t date men because they are lesbians, and turning up at our events or putting stickers in the women’s bathrooms in gay bars that lesbians “love girl c-ck”? And the erasure of lesbians is from both directions. Not only are these men demanding access to lesbian spaces and into our dating circles, but then lesbians who just like their hair short or prefer to buy clothes from the men’s section, are told they are not women, but are men and pushed down a pipeline towards irreversible changes and surgeries. Many of these lesbians in Belong To were convinced while attending the groups that they were ‘trans’, and therefore ‘straight men’. Luckily most of these lesbians desisted before any hormones or surgeries were taken. But for those who didn’t desist, they are now young women who are taking high dosages of testosterone and have undergone double mastectomies. The worst homophobia or lesbophobia any of the Not All Gays founders have experienced is from people who prop up the T, and demand that we just get over that silly thing called homosexuality and include the opposite sex in everything we do.

Not All Gays Ireland 🏳️‍🌈🇮🇪

15,449 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING : DISCORD SCANDAL OF NON MUSLIM WOMEN AND MUSLIM MEN IN INDIA JUST GOT EXPOSED A group of muslim are running a discord server which is exclusively for Non Muslim women majority of their Targets were Hindu women. This is Love Jihad on steroids. Hindu and other non Muslim women must strip their clothes off and write on their boobs and private parts that they love Muslim D**k or Proud Honda Sherni etc and she gets a verified entry. Muslim men will get entry upon reciting kalma. There are numerous such channels running on discord. Upon entry she will constantly post her derogatory nudes demeaning Hindu and non muslim men with anti Hindu remarks written on their body. AI Generated Images are shared as well. Ajmer scandal was nothing infront of this. These women could be your family members, friends or anyone you know. Guys be careful whom you are going to marry. If this is the situation of Modern feminist culture then … i got no words to speak or even express. When the masculine figures in their homes like brothers and fathers are weak and fragile and feminist minded femme boy, this is what the output will be. Modern parenting has failed. Are we going to tolerate this forever ?

Sensitive content

BREAKING : DISCORD SCANDAL OF NON MUSLIM WOMEN AND MUSLIM MEN IN INDIA JUST GOT EXPOSED A group of muslim are running a discord server which is exclusively for Non Muslim women majority of their Targets were Hindu women. This is Love Jihad on steroids. Hindu and other non Muslim women must strip their clothes off and write on their boobs and private parts that they love Muslim D**k or Proud Honda Sherni etc and she gets a verified entry. Muslim men will get entry upon reciting kalma. There are numerous such channels running on discord. Upon entry she will constantly post her derogatory nudes demeaning Hindu and non muslim men with anti Hindu remarks written on their body. AI Generated Images are shared as well. Ajmer scandal was nothing infront of this. These women could be your family members, friends or anyone you know. Guys be careful whom you are going to marry. If this is the situation of Modern feminist culture then … i got no words to speak or even express. When the masculine figures in their homes like brothers and fathers are weak and fragile and feminist minded femme boy, this is what the output will be. Modern parenting has failed. Are we going to tolerate this forever ?

Pattern Preacher

129,151 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I stand unapologetically and unequivocally with every woman, every man, and every child in Iran who yearns for freedom, dignity, and the most basic liberties that so many of us take for granted. The woke left is quick to lecture the world about international law when it suits their narrative. They line up the quotes, the conventions, the talking points. But where is that same outrage when it comes to the lived reality of the people inside Iran. If you’re going to quote international law about Iran, then quote the whole truth. What about the women of Iran. Women who can be arrested for showing their hair. Women beaten and detained by the so-called morality police. Women who cannot pass citizenship to their children on equal footing with men. Women whose testimony in court can carry half the weight of a man’s. Women who face legal discrimination in divorce and child custody. Women who need a husband’s permission for certain travel. Women barred from many stadiums and public events. Women imprisoned, flogged, or silenced for protesting compulsory hijab laws. Women who risk death for daring to say no. What about the men of Iran. Men who can be imprisoned for dissent. Men tortured for political opposition. Men executed after opaque trials. Men conscripted and sent to enforce the will of a regime they did not freely choose. Men who cannot criticize clerical authority without risking their livelihoods or their lives. Men jailed for journalism, activism, satire, or protest. Men who live under a system where the ballot does not truly change the power structure. What about the children of Iran. Girls forced into compulsory dress codes from a young age. Children exposed to state propaganda instead of open civic education. Children who can be married off at shockingly young legal ages. Children detained during protests. Children growing up under censorship, with restricted access to global information. Children facing economic hardship driven by corruption and isolation. Children watching parents arrested for speaking freely. Does that matter. If you invoke international law, invoke it for the dissident in prison. Invoke it for the woman beaten in the street. Invoke it for the child who has never known a free press. Human rights are not selective. They do not apply only when geopolitically convenient. If you truly stand for justice, start with the people who live under it every day.

I stand unapologetically and unequivocally with every woman, every man, and every child in Iran who yearns for freedom, dignity, and the most basic liberties that so many of us take for granted. The woke left is quick to lecture the world about international law when it suits their narrative. They line up the quotes, the conventions, the talking points. But where is that same outrage when it comes to the lived reality of the people inside Iran. If you’re going to quote international law about Iran, then quote the whole truth. What about the women of Iran. Women who can be arrested for showing their hair. Women beaten and detained by the so-called morality police. Women who cannot pass citizenship to their children on equal footing with men. Women whose testimony in court can carry half the weight of a man’s. Women who face legal discrimination in divorce and child custody. Women who need a husband’s permission for certain travel. Women barred from many stadiums and public events. Women imprisoned, flogged, or silenced for protesting compulsory hijab laws. Women who risk death for daring to say no. What about the men of Iran. Men who can be imprisoned for dissent. Men tortured for political opposition. Men executed after opaque trials. Men conscripted and sent to enforce the will of a regime they did not freely choose. Men who cannot criticize clerical authority without risking their livelihoods or their lives. Men jailed for journalism, activism, satire, or protest. Men who live under a system where the ballot does not truly change the power structure. What about the children of Iran. Girls forced into compulsory dress codes from a young age. Children exposed to state propaganda instead of open civic education. Children who can be married off at shockingly young legal ages. Children detained during protests. Children growing up under censorship, with restricted access to global information. Children facing economic hardship driven by corruption and isolation. Children watching parents arrested for speaking freely. Does that matter. If you invoke international law, invoke it for the dissident in prison. Invoke it for the woman beaten in the street. Invoke it for the child who has never known a free press. Human rights are not selective. They do not apply only when geopolitically convenient. If you truly stand for justice, start with the people who live under it every day.

Dimitris Soudas 🇨🇦⚜️🇬🇷☦️ 13.12.1943

88,264 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Some Men are upset with what Charleston White said about men being too pretty But let’s take a deeper look at it.. Objectively MATERIALISM IS FEMININE.. KNOWLEDGE IS MASCULINE.. This is how it was in all ancient societies! The men ruled with knowledge and Strength They had to provide and get dirty ! They were in the wild at times so they didn’t have time to focus on Certain things Like beauty.. But The women did But in a modern capitalistic America where we can have things in abundance And we don’t have to live in a certain Environment anymore We can relax a little bit as men And now we do have the time to focus Beauty also just like women But back in the old America That Charleston white is referring too This is how the men were taught! They went outside and got dirty They worked and got dirty And brung the money home The women/wives were the ones who Liked shopping and getting their hair done and buying jewelry and gossiping At the salons In black culture the 70s pimp culture Brought in some what of a feminine element where although they were Pimping they were focused on beauty For the first time.. And than In the 80s and 90s That’s when younger black American men got more into Staying fly And started shopping for brands And jewelry etc as crack and rap music Came in to the culture And than black men became perfect Targets for marketing materialism Too But originally these were feminine things Unc is right!!

Some Men are upset with what Charleston White said about men being too pretty But let’s take a deeper look at it.. Objectively MATERIALISM IS FEMININE.. KNOWLEDGE IS MASCULINE.. This is how it was in all ancient societies! The men ruled with knowledge and Strength They had to provide and get dirty ! They were in the wild at times so they didn’t have time to focus on Certain things Like beauty.. But The women did But in a modern capitalistic America where we can have things in abundance And we don’t have to live in a certain Environment anymore We can relax a little bit as men And now we do have the time to focus Beauty also just like women But back in the old America That Charleston white is referring too This is how the men were taught! They went outside and got dirty They worked and got dirty And brung the money home The women/wives were the ones who Liked shopping and getting their hair done and buying jewelry and gossiping At the salons In black culture the 70s pimp culture Brought in some what of a feminine element where although they were Pimping they were focused on beauty For the first time.. And than In the 80s and 90s That’s when younger black American men got more into Staying fly And started shopping for brands And jewelry etc as crack and rap music Came in to the culture And than black men became perfect Targets for marketing materialism Too But originally these were feminine things Unc is right!!

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

169,066 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Two reasons it is impossible for any man to “feel like a woman.” Feelings are sensations, either physical or emotional. 1. Men can’t feel the physical sensations of existing in a female body. Men are always feeling the physical sensations of their male body. Thus they can’t physically feel female. 2. There are no sex specific emotions. Thus men can’t emotionally feel female. So what is happening? Like the anorexic who claims she “feels fat,” men are having a mentally obsessive thought. The anorexic can’t physically feel obesity sensations nor are there fat emotions. She’s having an obsessive thought that causes anxiety. Same goes for the men who claim they feel like women. It’s a mental ideation that they are obsessively thinking about which causes frustration, anxiety, anger, and depression. But it isn’t a feeling in itself, it’s a thought that causes feelings. This thought can be addressed.

Sensitive content

Two reasons it is impossible for any man to “feel like a woman.” Feelings are sensations, either physical or emotional. 1. Men can’t feel the physical sensations of existing in a female body. Men are always feeling the physical sensations of their male body. Thus they can’t physically feel female. 2. There are no sex specific emotions. Thus men can’t emotionally feel female. So what is happening? Like the anorexic who claims she “feels fat,” men are having a mentally obsessive thought. The anorexic can’t physically feel obesity sensations nor are there fat emotions. She’s having an obsessive thought that causes anxiety. Same goes for the men who claim they feel like women. It’s a mental ideation that they are obsessively thinking about which causes frustration, anxiety, anger, and depression. But it isn’t a feeling in itself, it’s a thought that causes feelings. This thought can be addressed.

Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology

27,737 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Today, I have a question. A pressing question. For some Western feminists. How can you remain silent, when women and girls are raped, tortured, their bodies carried around naked and spat on by bearded men shouting Allah Akbar? Then you can never call yourself a feminist again. Every day, including today, some Western hypocritical feminists should be ashamed of their silence on the horror that Hamas men inflicted to women and girls on 7 October. And that includes big names we were once proud of. Why are their lips sealed and their hearts of stone when it comes to the excruciating pain of Jewish women? The MeToo movement and so-called intersectional feminists do not care about all women. If they remain silent, it means they have lied to us about their commitment to women's rights. Their actions support the oppressor, not the victims. Also the EU money does. Indirectly. Those who say nothing about these women and the hostages, should not be standing here and speaking about human rights. When you are under attack by terrorists, a cease fire is like raising your hands when you are being shot at. Perhaps it is worth considering that a real lasting cease fire will start with bringing back all the hostages to their homes and the rapists to justice. Assita

Today, I have a question. A pressing question. For some Western feminists. How can you remain silent, when women and girls are raped, tortured, their bodies carried around naked and spat on by bearded men shouting Allah Akbar? Then you can never call yourself a feminist again. Every day, including today, some Western hypocritical feminists should be ashamed of their silence on the horror that Hamas men inflicted to women and girls on 7 October. And that includes big names we were once proud of. Why are their lips sealed and their hearts of stone when it comes to the excruciating pain of Jewish women? The MeToo movement and so-called intersectional feminists do not care about all women. If they remain silent, it means they have lied to us about their commitment to women's rights. Their actions support the oppressor, not the victims. Also the EU money does. Indirectly. Those who say nothing about these women and the hostages, should not be standing here and speaking about human rights. When you are under attack by terrorists, a cease fire is like raising your hands when you are being shot at. Perhaps it is worth considering that a real lasting cease fire will start with bringing back all the hostages to their homes and the rapists to justice. Assita

Assita Kanko MEP

4,669,614 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Mount Fletcher, Eastern Cape: Alwande Mhlanga was a 9-year-old Grade 4 student from Tsolobeng village in Mount Fletcher. Tragically, she was brutally murdered in her sleep at home on the night of Wednesday, March 11, 2026. According to her grandmother, she heard a loud bang on the door of their one-room hut. When she looked up, she saw the door wide open and two men standing over them. Confused and in shock, she asked the men who they were and what they wanted. One of the men responded, telling the elderly woman to "watch and learn." As she struggled to understand the situation, she noticed a group of men outside. Again, she inquired about their intentions, and one of the men accused her of being a witch. Another man informed her that they were there to take her granddaughter's life and that she would be forced to watch as a lesson. In a horrifying act, one of the men repeatedly struck Alwande with an axe while another man held her grandmother at knifepoint, ensuring that she witnessed the brutal scene. Seven weeks have passed, and no one has been arrested for this incident. 💔

Mount Fletcher, Eastern Cape: Alwande Mhlanga was a 9-year-old Grade 4 student from Tsolobeng village in Mount Fletcher. Tragically, she was brutally murdered in her sleep at home on the night of Wednesday, March 11, 2026. According to her grandmother, she heard a loud bang on the door of their one-room hut. When she looked up, she saw the door wide open and two men standing over them. Confused and in shock, she asked the men who they were and what they wanted. One of the men responded, telling the elderly woman to "watch and learn." As she struggled to understand the situation, she noticed a group of men outside. Again, she inquired about their intentions, and one of the men accused her of being a witch. Another man informed her that they were there to take her granddaughter's life and that she would be forced to watch as a lesson. In a horrifying act, one of the men repeatedly struck Alwande with an axe while another man held her grandmother at knifepoint, ensuring that she witnessed the brutal scene. Seven weeks have passed, and no one has been arrested for this incident. 💔

GALAXY-2:20 VIDEO🔌

15,366 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kings of the Road (1976, Wenders) "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" --- Wim Wenders Full Excerpt: "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is the story of two men, but it doesn't take a Hollywood approach to the subject. American films about men - especially recent ones - are exercises in suppression: the men's true relationships with women, or with each other, are displaced by story, action and the need to entertain. They leave out the real nub: why the men prefer to be together, why they get on with each other, why they don't get on with women, or, if they do, then only as a pastime. My film is about precisely that: two men getting on together, each preferring the other's company to that of a woman. You get to see the shortcomings of both of them, their emotional insecurity; you see them trying to be mutually supportive and to hide their faults. But with the passage of time they're no longer bothered by these faults, and when they know each other well enough they begin discussing them. As a consequence of that, they split up. They split up because, on their journey across Germany, they've suddenly grown too close. It's a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" ('The Logic of Images, Essays and Conversations, Wim Wenders, 1988)

Kings of the Road (1976, Wenders) "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" --- Wim Wenders Full Excerpt: "'Kings of the Road' (1976) is the story of two men, but it doesn't take a Hollywood approach to the subject. American films about men - especially recent ones - are exercises in suppression: the men's true relationships with women, or with each other, are displaced by story, action and the need to entertain. They leave out the real nub: why the men prefer to be together, why they get on with each other, why they don't get on with women, or, if they do, then only as a pastime. My film is about precisely that: two men getting on together, each preferring the other's company to that of a woman. You get to see the shortcomings of both of them, their emotional insecurity; you see them trying to be mutually supportive and to hide their faults. But with the passage of time they're no longer bothered by these faults, and when they know each other well enough they begin discussing them. As a consequence of that, they split up. They split up because, on their journey across Germany, they've suddenly grown too close. It's a story that you're not often told in films about men. The story of the absence of women, which is at the same time the story of the longing for their presence!" ('The Logic of Images, Essays and Conversations, Wim Wenders, 1988)

DepressedBergman

23,433 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

It’s abundantly clear to me that Tim Walz does not understand what masculinity is, based on his demeanor and his constant comparisons of manhood to activities rather than attributes. When Walz was chosen as Kamala Harris’s running mate, Democrats immediately saw it as an opportunity to "win back" the men they had alienated with their anti-male, antagonistic rhetoric and irreverent messaging toward us. Kamala Harris had a quintessential "man problem," and they thought Tim Walz could shore up her failing male support in the polls. MSNBC fawned over him, portraying him as a sort of modern or new-age man who is highly emotional yet somehow internally macho. Through the lens of there being only two types of men—toxic and non-toxic—they spent so much time painting Trump as the toxic man that they were left with a try-hard, insecure figure like Tim Walz. There are many ways to tell if someone is insecure about who they are, but a clear sign is that they spend far too much time trying to prove what they are instead of simply being it. Trump doesn’t incessantly talk about how he’s a "real man" or use every media appearance to convince you he’s relatable to men through some stereotypically male activity. Whether you love or hate Trump, he just is himself. He’s confident—not because he says he’s confident, but because he simply is. A person who explicitly tells you how smart they are likely isn’t smart and doesn’t believe it themselves. This applies to any other internal attribute. It’s not for someone to tell you their character; it’s for others to assess for themselves. Tim Walz believes that masculinity is measurable by the activities he’s participated in and by bragging about how great he is at a given male-associated pursuit. While there are activities typically associated with men, those activities don’t make you masculine or a man. Tim Walz loves to bring up how he hunts, but there are women who hunt too—that doesn’t make them men or masculine. Walz’s insecurity aligns with my biggest problem with the political left and how they equate the essence of manhood with a list of activities instead of personal qualities. It’s no different from saying womanhood is equivalent to wearing dresses and makeup, which is an absurdly low threshold. So, what is a masculine man? Masculine men are balanced individuals who are not easily toppled emotionally. They are confident in their capabilities while maintaining humility and acknowledging where they fall short. Masculine men are calm under pressure yet recognize the need to step away from conflict when necessary. These men are purpose-driven and willing to sacrifice themselves for the people they love. Plenty of masculine men don’t know how to fix a car, play football, or hunt, because these activities never defined what it is to be a man. They are simply pursuits that men can bond over, learn from, or use to accentuate what they already possess. Walz is what I would define as a performative man. He’s a guy who is always trying to prove himself to the world, which is why he’s constantly talking about the supposedly manly things he does. He sounds incredibly goofy when he tries to talk tough, as if this middle-aged man is prepared to get into a street fight at a moment’s notice. But masculine men don’t feel the need to prove anything to anyone. They don’t speak recklessly, especially about engaging in violent acts. If you are something, you don’t have to convince anyone to believe it. People can tell what’s genuine and what isn’t. Tim Walz isn’t some new-age masculine man; he’s an insecure guy who desperately wants you to believe he’s something more than he actually is.

It’s abundantly clear to me that Tim Walz does not understand what masculinity is, based on his demeanor and his constant comparisons of manhood to activities rather than attributes. When Walz was chosen as Kamala Harris’s running mate, Democrats immediately saw it as an opportunity to "win back" the men they had alienated with their anti-male, antagonistic rhetoric and irreverent messaging toward us. Kamala Harris had a quintessential "man problem," and they thought Tim Walz could shore up her failing male support in the polls. MSNBC fawned over him, portraying him as a sort of modern or new-age man who is highly emotional yet somehow internally macho. Through the lens of there being only two types of men—toxic and non-toxic—they spent so much time painting Trump as the toxic man that they were left with a try-hard, insecure figure like Tim Walz. There are many ways to tell if someone is insecure about who they are, but a clear sign is that they spend far too much time trying to prove what they are instead of simply being it. Trump doesn’t incessantly talk about how he’s a "real man" or use every media appearance to convince you he’s relatable to men through some stereotypically male activity. Whether you love or hate Trump, he just is himself. He’s confident—not because he says he’s confident, but because he simply is. A person who explicitly tells you how smart they are likely isn’t smart and doesn’t believe it themselves. This applies to any other internal attribute. It’s not for someone to tell you their character; it’s for others to assess for themselves. Tim Walz believes that masculinity is measurable by the activities he’s participated in and by bragging about how great he is at a given male-associated pursuit. While there are activities typically associated with men, those activities don’t make you masculine or a man. Tim Walz loves to bring up how he hunts, but there are women who hunt too—that doesn’t make them men or masculine. Walz’s insecurity aligns with my biggest problem with the political left and how they equate the essence of manhood with a list of activities instead of personal qualities. It’s no different from saying womanhood is equivalent to wearing dresses and makeup, which is an absurdly low threshold. So, what is a masculine man? Masculine men are balanced individuals who are not easily toppled emotionally. They are confident in their capabilities while maintaining humility and acknowledging where they fall short. Masculine men are calm under pressure yet recognize the need to step away from conflict when necessary. These men are purpose-driven and willing to sacrifice themselves for the people they love. Plenty of masculine men don’t know how to fix a car, play football, or hunt, because these activities never defined what it is to be a man. They are simply pursuits that men can bond over, learn from, or use to accentuate what they already possess. Walz is what I would define as a performative man. He’s a guy who is always trying to prove himself to the world, which is why he’s constantly talking about the supposedly manly things he does. He sounds incredibly goofy when he tries to talk tough, as if this middle-aged man is prepared to get into a street fight at a moment’s notice. But masculine men don’t feel the need to prove anything to anyone. They don’t speak recklessly, especially about engaging in violent acts. If you are something, you don’t have to convince anyone to believe it. People can tell what’s genuine and what isn’t. Tim Walz isn’t some new-age masculine man; he’s an insecure guy who desperately wants you to believe he’s something more than he actually is.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

79,419 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Americans are outraged Zohran Mamdani swore in as Mayor of New York City on the Quran. This only leads to Sharia Law “Zohran Mamdani just swore in on the Quran — Let's learn what the Quran says - Per the Quran, men may have up to 4 wives whom they have complete authority over, but women may only have one husband - Women are not allowed to refuse intimacy with their husbands - The Quran actually instructs the husbands to beat their wives for disobedience - The Quran permits men to marry three pubescent girls and then consummate the marriage once the man decides that the girl is physically able to tolerate it - The Quran also establishes a legal inequality between men and women. Women are not treated as equals, they are treated as lesser than There’s more, but we’re going to move along to Islamic law, which stems from the Quran - Allows for the death penalty for gays and the abuse of women at the discretion of their husbands - The Quran also explicitly calls for violence against nonbelievers - Fitnah is worse than killing. What is Fitnah, you ask? Well, Fitnah is unbelief or the resistance to Islamic dominance and authority. It is better to kill people than to allow Fitnah again, unbelief or resistance to Islamic dominance and authority. And liberals, progressives, that’s your guy. That’s your guy. Do you have any understanding of what it is you are cheering for? Clearly not.”

Americans are outraged Zohran Mamdani swore in as Mayor of New York City on the Quran. This only leads to Sharia Law “Zohran Mamdani just swore in on the Quran — Let's learn what the Quran says - Per the Quran, men may have up to 4 wives whom they have complete authority over, but women may only have one husband - Women are not allowed to refuse intimacy with their husbands - The Quran actually instructs the husbands to beat their wives for disobedience - The Quran permits men to marry three pubescent girls and then consummate the marriage once the man decides that the girl is physically able to tolerate it - The Quran also establishes a legal inequality between men and women. Women are not treated as equals, they are treated as lesser than There’s more, but we’re going to move along to Islamic law, which stems from the Quran - Allows for the death penalty for gays and the abuse of women at the discretion of their husbands - The Quran also explicitly calls for violence against nonbelievers - Fitnah is worse than killing. What is Fitnah, you ask? Well, Fitnah is unbelief or the resistance to Islamic dominance and authority. It is better to kill people than to allow Fitnah again, unbelief or resistance to Islamic dominance and authority. And liberals, progressives, that’s your guy. That’s your guy. Do you have any understanding of what it is you are cheering for? Clearly not.”

Wall Street Apes

135,552 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Women are becoming feminists because young men embody a r*tarded masculinity. -- N.D. Wilson Again, in blaming young men (in part at least) we are completely missing the responsibility of Christian women to hold themselves to Biblical standards. We’re letting their fathers get away with disgruntled and poorly managed households. Culpability is not on the 17–30-year-old man who has acted “r*tardedly,” and by that, I assume he means “toxic masculinity” (vis-à-vis Andrew Tate). It’s on you, father; you, Christian lady; and you, pastor, to raise young women in the admonition of the Lord. The constant blame shifting is so obtuse, so lazy, so obviously wrong in every other sin scenario with the exception of this one. Men rush to make defense of sinful women, particularly young women, even otherwise conservative men. Perhaps men act this way because women, fathers, the church, society has gone so awry that this is the response? N.D. is not wrong. Women become feminists because men to live up to true masculinity. But men don't live up to true masculinity because their fathers, the church, and society has failed them. The benefits of embodying true masculinity are slim. It's disincentivized in every area of life. (John Doyle's video on this and Andrew Tate was fantastic (link below)) So while all of these things seem true, in keeping with N.D. Wilson' line of thinking the obvious solution is to ignore the reasons. The only reason for any of our problems is man's fallen nature and sin. So we should instead encourage people to stop making excuses and start making progress toward goodness and godliness. Call out their sin, whether sinful masculinity or sinful femininity, focusing on the true reason for the sin—which is their own deceitfulness and lying heart—and the cure, which is Christ and a biblically structured approach. This line of talk is rarely useful especially when not counter-balanced with admonishing whoever we're making de facto excuses for with their own responsibility.

Women are becoming feminists because young men embody a rtarded masculinity. -- N.D. Wilson Again, in blaming young men (in part at least) we are completely missing the responsibility of Christian women to hold themselves to Biblical standards. We’re letting their fathers get away with disgruntled and poorly managed households. Culpability is not on the 17–30-year-old man who has acted “rtardedly,” and by that, I assume he means “toxic masculinity” (vis-à-vis Andrew Tate). It’s on you, father; you, Christian lady; and you, pastor, to raise young women in the admonition of the Lord. The constant blame shifting is so obtuse, so lazy, so obviously wrong in every other sin scenario with the exception of this one. Men rush to make defense of sinful women, particularly young women, even otherwise conservative men. Perhaps men act this way because women, fathers, the church, society has gone so awry that this is the response? N.D. is not wrong. Women become feminists because men to live up to true masculinity. But men don't live up to true masculinity because their fathers, the church, and society has failed them. The benefits of embodying true masculinity are slim. It's disincentivized in every area of life. (John Doyle's video on this and Andrew Tate was fantastic (link below)) So while all of these things seem true, in keeping with N.D. Wilson' line of thinking the obvious solution is to ignore the reasons. The only reason for any of our problems is man's fallen nature and sin. So we should instead encourage people to stop making excuses and start making progress toward goodness and godliness. Call out their sin, whether sinful masculinity or sinful femininity, focusing on the true reason for the sin—which is their own deceitfulness and lying heart—and the cure, which is Christ and a biblically structured approach. This line of talk is rarely useful especially when not counter-balanced with admonishing whoever we're making de facto excuses for with their own responsibility.

Dave 🧊

94,092 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Jordan Peterson revealed the uncomfortable truth about what women really desire in men: 1. Women don’t just look for a man they love. They look for a man they can respect, rely on, and build a future with when life gets serious. 2. A strong woman doesn’t want a weak man she has to carry. She wants someone who can stand beside her, challenge her, and still make her feel safe. 3. The more successful a woman becomes, the smaller her dating pool gets. Not because success makes her unattractive, but because her standards naturally rise with her own level. 4. Highly accomplished women don’t intimidate men on purpose. But their intelligence, ambition, beauty, and status can make most men feel like they have no chance. 5. Men are more afraid of rejection than women realize. When a woman looks like she already has endless options, many men don’t even try. 6. Women often look across and above their own level. They naturally desire men who are equal or higher in confidence, competence, maturity, status, or stability. 7. No woman wants to build a life with a man she has to parent. She wants support because marriage, children, and family demand a man who can carry responsibility. 8. Men and women experience time differently in dating. A woman near 30 may think seriously about children, while a man of the same age may still feel he has years to decide. 9. A young woman is often valued immediately. A young man usually has to build himself before the world starts paying attention to him. 10. That’s why men are forced to develop depth. They build skill, confidence, money, personality, discipline, and status because looks alone rarely carry them. 11. A real man is not just older, richer, or dominant. He is emotionally stable, mentally strong, and capable of making a woman feel protected without controlling her. 12. Modern dating is painful because desire is not politically correct. People can say whatever they want, but biology, age, ambition, status, and attraction still shape choices. 13. The hard truth for men is simple. Don’t complain about women’s standards. Become the kind of man who can meet them. 14. The hard truth for women is also simple. Success gives freedom, but it can also shrink your options when you expect a man above your level. 15. Peterson’s point is not that men or women are wrong. It’s that attraction has rules, and ignoring those rules creates confusion, resentment, and loneliness.

Jordan Peterson revealed the uncomfortable truth about what women really desire in men: 1. Women don’t just look for a man they love. They look for a man they can respect, rely on, and build a future with when life gets serious. 2. A strong woman doesn’t want a weak man she has to carry. She wants someone who can stand beside her, challenge her, and still make her feel safe. 3. The more successful a woman becomes, the smaller her dating pool gets. Not because success makes her unattractive, but because her standards naturally rise with her own level. 4. Highly accomplished women don’t intimidate men on purpose. But their intelligence, ambition, beauty, and status can make most men feel like they have no chance. 5. Men are more afraid of rejection than women realize. When a woman looks like she already has endless options, many men don’t even try. 6. Women often look across and above their own level. They naturally desire men who are equal or higher in confidence, competence, maturity, status, or stability. 7. No woman wants to build a life with a man she has to parent. She wants support because marriage, children, and family demand a man who can carry responsibility. 8. Men and women experience time differently in dating. A woman near 30 may think seriously about children, while a man of the same age may still feel he has years to decide. 9. A young woman is often valued immediately. A young man usually has to build himself before the world starts paying attention to him. 10. That’s why men are forced to develop depth. They build skill, confidence, money, personality, discipline, and status because looks alone rarely carry them. 11. A real man is not just older, richer, or dominant. He is emotionally stable, mentally strong, and capable of making a woman feel protected without controlling her. 12. Modern dating is painful because desire is not politically correct. People can say whatever they want, but biology, age, ambition, status, and attraction still shape choices. 13. The hard truth for men is simple. Don’t complain about women’s standards. Become the kind of man who can meet them. 14. The hard truth for women is also simple. Success gives freedom, but it can also shrink your options when you expect a man above your level. 15. Peterson’s point is not that men or women are wrong. It’s that attraction has rules, and ignoring those rules creates confusion, resentment, and loneliness.

Prasad

251,176 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Van Jones' ominous warning for the mainstream media: "Men are hurting, man. Men are hurting. And the feminist culture tells you, don't cry because you're the problem anyway. And the masculine culture tells you don't cry. Cause boys don't cry. So you just aren't able to talk about how scared you are. You can't provide for anybody. You don't. You can't talk about how scared you are that you don't understand your kids and what's going to happen to them. You can't talk about anything. So at least Donald Trump lets you have an emotion besides shame. But I'm telling you right now, you guys are going to be in trouble next. Because until somebody fixes these problems for real people, there is a rebellion in this country. And anybody who comes out and sounds like they aren't pulling their talking points out of Cracker Jack Box will get a hearing whether they're right or wrong or otherwise." It's the end of 2024, and Van Jones has finally realized the public does not like the media lying to their faces. Sadly, in this room he is 'cutting edge' compared to the other leftists.

Van Jones' ominous warning for the mainstream media: "Men are hurting, man. Men are hurting. And the feminist culture tells you, don't cry because you're the problem anyway. And the masculine culture tells you don't cry. Cause boys don't cry. So you just aren't able to talk about how scared you are. You can't provide for anybody. You don't. You can't talk about how scared you are that you don't understand your kids and what's going to happen to them. You can't talk about anything. So at least Donald Trump lets you have an emotion besides shame. But I'm telling you right now, you guys are going to be in trouble next. Because until somebody fixes these problems for real people, there is a rebellion in this country. And anybody who comes out and sounds like they aren't pulling their talking points out of Cracker Jack Box will get a hearing whether they're right or wrong or otherwise." It's the end of 2024, and Van Jones has finally realized the public does not like the media lying to their faces. Sadly, in this room he is 'cutting edge' compared to the other leftists.

Eric Abbenante

188,728 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Douglas Wilson

161,884 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Lies and the war on men. What is The Duluth Model? The Duluth model promotes the view that hitting is a conscious strategy by MEN to assert their dominance over women. It was named over a SINGLE crime where a man killed a woman in Duluth, Minnesota in 1981. The entire theory is based on this one event and is applied to all men in domestic violence incidents as a model of male behaviour. This is the equivalent of taking Amber Heard as a representative model of all women. However, this satanic feminist ideology is completely unsupported. Most boys experience their first bout of violence from their mothers. Look at any film where relevant, and you'll see hundreds of times where a mother in a movie (normalised) slaps, punches or threatens to kill their sons. Sexual abuse is also very prevalent in single mother households. Little boys are often used as if they were the husband. If we had news articles stating that "Women are the problem" all single mothers are the problem and are more likely to be sexual predators would that be fair? Or, should we understand this problem is not a gendered problem with just women but indicative of the person and their past (generational violence) A mother that abandons her child (common) is glorified in the media "She must be reunited" but if a Father disciplines his child to teach his son not to hit anyone ever again, he's demonised. Men are punished at every opportunity and we afford women every excuse imaginable. The Duluth model is directly aimed at ALL men. It holds no explanation for female violence.

Lies and the war on men. What is The Duluth Model? The Duluth model promotes the view that hitting is a conscious strategy by MEN to assert their dominance over women. It was named over a SINGLE crime where a man killed a woman in Duluth, Minnesota in 1981. The entire theory is based on this one event and is applied to all men in domestic violence incidents as a model of male behaviour. This is the equivalent of taking Amber Heard as a representative model of all women. However, this satanic feminist ideology is completely unsupported. Most boys experience their first bout of violence from their mothers. Look at any film where relevant, and you'll see hundreds of times where a mother in a movie (normalised) slaps, punches or threatens to kill their sons. Sexual abuse is also very prevalent in single mother households. Little boys are often used as if they were the husband. If we had news articles stating that "Women are the problem" all single mothers are the problem and are more likely to be sexual predators would that be fair? Or, should we understand this problem is not a gendered problem with just women but indicative of the person and their past (generational violence) A mother that abandons her child (common) is glorified in the media "She must be reunited" but if a Father disciplines his child to teach his son not to hit anyone ever again, he's demonised. Men are punished at every opportunity and we afford women every excuse imaginable. The Duluth model is directly aimed at ALL men. It holds no explanation for female violence.

FHousebunny

23,568 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 WHITE LIBERAL WOMEN: YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED 🚨 A new poll shows college-educated white women adore Zelensky while hating Trump, JD Vance, and the GOP. Why? Because their maternal instinct has been hijacked—just like when they swooned over CEO shooter Luigi Mangion or sent love letters to men on Death Row. They cheered for BLM riots that caused $1B in damage, they scream for DEI while drowning in student debt, and they protest for men who couldn’t care less about them—all while being miserable, single, and dependent on antidepressants. Meanwhile, conservative women are THRIVING. Research shows they reject victimhood, prioritize marriage & family, and actually find happiness. While leftist women marry the Democratic Party—a deadbeat, abusive boyfriend who keeps them miserable. 🔥 Wake up, ladies. You’re burning your own future like a Vegas Tesla dealership. 🔥 #FAFO #Trump2024 #WalkAway

🚨 WHITE LIBERAL WOMEN: YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED 🚨 A new poll shows college-educated white women adore Zelensky while hating Trump, JD Vance, and the GOP. Why? Because their maternal instinct has been hijacked—just like when they swooned over CEO shooter Luigi Mangion or sent love letters to men on Death Row. They cheered for BLM riots that caused $1B in damage, they scream for DEI while drowning in student debt, and they protest for men who couldn’t care less about them—all while being miserable, single, and dependent on antidepressants. Meanwhile, conservative women are THRIVING. Research shows they reject victimhood, prioritize marriage & family, and actually find happiness. While leftist women marry the Democratic Party—a deadbeat, abusive boyfriend who keeps them miserable. 🔥 Wake up, ladies. You’re burning your own future like a Vegas Tesla dealership. 🔥 #FAFO #Trump2024 #WalkAway

Project Constitution

63,815 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I’m actually at this point convinced that maybe monagomy wasn’t a good idea. The irony of it all ? The very very very RARE needle in the haystack type of men now days who’s are in the best shape emotionally Spiritually physically and financially who are faithful to one woman are ironically the ones who should be procreating with way more women and the ones who feel entitled to lie cheat and have multiple women shouldn’t breed with even one woman lmao Hitler I think even somewhat understood this. This is why they started the Lebensborn program. Where there were breeding camps. Hitler even understood in nature that just a woman’s presence and womb was 1000x worth more value than these shit coward no good men that he talked about complaining in the beginning of Mein Kampf who cheated on, beat their wives, and chose alcohol and prostitution over the family… and it was the wives begging for them to change and participate in saving Germany actually. The breeding camps gave universal basic income to all the women. Good decent. Single moms. Even women with troubled pasts. Etc. All of them were seen more than worthy of only being allowed to breed with THE TOP OF THE TOP SS OFFICERS. THE TOP IN EVERY POSSIBLE WAY! This is what he considered eugenics… no it wasn’t men going “wHaT dO brinG tO thE tAbLe” these women their wombs and existence and ability to create children WAS THE TABLE … and only the few top of top Of SS men were allowed to procreate and that was it. They had universal basic income for them and the children and child care … Hitler was devastated when his mom died. He was a mommas boy not in a gay toxic way. But he just valued women. He knew women in certain ways were actually higher beings than most men. I said it. This would be the only polygamy that would make sense tbh.

I’m actually at this point convinced that maybe monagomy wasn’t a good idea. The irony of it all ? The very very very RARE needle in the haystack type of men now days who’s are in the best shape emotionally Spiritually physically and financially who are faithful to one woman are ironically the ones who should be procreating with way more women and the ones who feel entitled to lie cheat and have multiple women shouldn’t breed with even one woman lmao Hitler I think even somewhat understood this. This is why they started the Lebensborn program. Where there were breeding camps. Hitler even understood in nature that just a woman’s presence and womb was 1000x worth more value than these shit coward no good men that he talked about complaining in the beginning of Mein Kampf who cheated on, beat their wives, and chose alcohol and prostitution over the family… and it was the wives begging for them to change and participate in saving Germany actually. The breeding camps gave universal basic income to all the women. Good decent. Single moms. Even women with troubled pasts. Etc. All of them were seen more than worthy of only being allowed to breed with THE TOP OF THE TOP SS OFFICERS. THE TOP IN EVERY POSSIBLE WAY! This is what he considered eugenics… no it wasn’t men going “wHaT dO brinG tO thE tAbLe” these women their wombs and existence and ability to create children WAS THE TABLE … and only the few top of top Of SS men were allowed to procreate and that was it. They had universal basic income for them and the children and child care … Hitler was devastated when his mom died. He was a mommas boy not in a gay toxic way. But he just valued women. He knew women in certain ways were actually higher beings than most men. I said it. This would be the only polygamy that would make sense tbh.

Astro Morrigan ♀⚡️

13,936 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The natural progression of women wanting to copy men is that British Vogue article. The crux of it is that women are jealous of other women being in relationships while they are not, and they use the masculine “boss babe” agenda to hide that fact. Make them believe the latter to deny the former. So it is the collective way for unsuccessful women to shame those who are successful in their personal lives. Women who are winning will then be influenced into believing that something is wrong with them. The single-female-friend-group self-sabotage is now operating on a grand scale through the networking effect of social media. Another example of the female self-stirring “shitshow” the more we give them a voice. The opposite is not true for men, as men are judged on their accomplishments first and foremost. If a man makes his whole or main identity being a husband, he is falling for the feminine value matrix through association in mating. This is how women are currently trying to frame men as accessories - as evidence of their own success, the same way men do with trophy wives. The copying here happens when women don’t want to come across as “less than” within a relationship, because we have entered a matriarchal and gynocratic society where the approval of other women outweighs the approval of the man they are with. This is further evidence of why “husband material” is an insult toward a man and an early sign of his future emasculation by her, in the same way women are being made to feel. Another effort of the mainstream is to eliminate any degree of polarity between the genders.

The natural progression of women wanting to copy men is that British Vogue article. The crux of it is that women are jealous of other women being in relationships while they are not, and they use the masculine “boss babe” agenda to hide that fact. Make them believe the latter to deny the former. So it is the collective way for unsuccessful women to shame those who are successful in their personal lives. Women who are winning will then be influenced into believing that something is wrong with them. The single-female-friend-group self-sabotage is now operating on a grand scale through the networking effect of social media. Another example of the female self-stirring “shitshow” the more we give them a voice. The opposite is not true for men, as men are judged on their accomplishments first and foremost. If a man makes his whole or main identity being a husband, he is falling for the feminine value matrix through association in mating. This is how women are currently trying to frame men as accessories - as evidence of their own success, the same way men do with trophy wives. The copying here happens when women don’t want to come across as “less than” within a relationship, because we have entered a matriarchal and gynocratic society where the approval of other women outweighs the approval of the man they are with. This is further evidence of why “husband material” is an insult toward a man and an early sign of his future emasculation by her, in the same way women are being made to feel. Another effort of the mainstream is to eliminate any degree of polarity between the genders.

French OG

37,506 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten