正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Two months ago on Core Memory, Sam Altman called out Anthropic's "fear based marketing" (wrt mythos/Fable) and their intent to gatekeep AI This week alone, Dario has gone on record repeatedly about wanting to slow AI progress Anthropic silently degraded AI-research queries to Fable (they changed course on this,...

maxxrubin_'s profile picture

Max

1,247 subscribers

28,440 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Sad to say that there is no expenditure being made by the State Government of #Odisha for the people of this state and for their development. Time and again this has been brought to the attention of #Odisha Government by Biju Janata Dal that there must be some expenditure for the development of the people of the state, but they seem to be totally neglectful about this. Everyone is suffering. It's not exclusive to any people, it is everyone that is suffering. It's like they're playing on empty vessels, and we all know that empty vessels make a good sound, and that's what they're satisfied by. #BJDWithOdisha
1:16

Sad to say that there is no expenditure being made by the State Government of #Odisha for the people of this state and for their development. Time and again this has been brought to the attention of #Odisha Government by Biju Janata Dal that there must be some expenditure for the development of the people of the state, but they seem to be totally neglectful about this. Everyone is suffering. It's not exclusive to any people, it is everyone that is suffering. It's like they're playing on empty vessels, and we all know that empty vessels make a good sound, and that's what they're satisfied by. #BJDWithOdisha

Naveen Patnaik

29,681 次观看 • 7 个月前

Fable 5 is coming back! (not official, but all signs point to 'SOON'') Sakana AI released "Fugu" and it's REALLY good on Andrej Karpathy's AutoResearch (better than GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8) also, Sam Altman unveils "Jalapeno", the AI inference chip designed in part by... openAI models:
24:53

Fable 5 is coming back! (not official, but all signs point to 'SOON'') Sakana AI released "Fugu" and it's REALLY good on Andrej Karpathy's AutoResearch (better than GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8) also, Sam Altman unveils "Jalapeno", the AI inference chip designed in part by... openAI models:

Wes Roth

11,712 次观看 • 1 个月前

Trump says that the Iranians gave him a generous gift. For all the good he has done for their country: - Actually, it's wonderful. They presented us with a gift. It arrived just today. It's very large, and it costs a lot of money. I won't talk about it, but I'll just say that it's a significant gift. And they presented it to us. What they told me personally is that we're now dealing with the "right people". No, it's not related to the nuclear issue, but rather to the oil and gas sector. It was very kind of them. And it showed me that we're dealing with the right people.
0:35

Trump says that the Iranians gave him a generous gift. For all the good he has done for their country: - Actually, it's wonderful. They presented us with a gift. It arrived just today. It's very large, and it costs a lot of money. I won't talk about it, but I'll just say that it's a significant gift. And they presented it to us. What they told me personally is that we're now dealing with the "right people". No, it's not related to the nuclear issue, but rather to the oil and gas sector. It was very kind of them. And it showed me that we're dealing with the right people.

S p r i n t e r

18,956 次观看 • 4 个月前

What has become clear with the Sol and Fable releases: Anthropic, has pulled into the lead by at least 1 full cycle — and this is bad. Mythos is already several months old, and while Sol is good I would still pick Fable for ~50-55% of tasks. Meanwhile, Anthropic, has not been resting, they'll have another model here soon enough (and once again tell everyone why its so scary - please, flog me daddy). Anthropic being in the lead is dangerous. It gives them the very power we shouldn’t trust them with. Dario himself said: “Now that we are in a leading position, I, and Daniella, are trying to move the dial even further towards being careful. Thats what the Mythos release was about. It’s very hard to do something like that if you’re not the leading player” He's not wrong. Being the leading player has given Anthropic the ability to push this agenda hard. He is a true believer in the dangers of AI, but frighteningly believes that the only mitigation full control by a small number of people, him being one of them - if not the chief. He really believes that. If you think back on the tiff with the Department of War, Dario reportedly said he would be willing to give them letters of exception to the terms of service on a case by case basis if they just ask — who does that empower? Having Fable removed led to a new process be imposed on their competitors (OpenAI with 5.6). This wasn’t a mistake like so many people thought it was. They didn’t poke the bear only to get their heads ripped off. Nope, its was a honeypot and the administration fell for it. The frustrating thing is, Dario is right, no one can push back on this agenda because Anthripic is in the lead. We desperately need competition to keep AI well distributed. I’ve heard rumors that the Trump administration could try to use antitrust against Anthropic, but that would be a huge mistake and feed the very kind of institutional control that Dario so very much wants. We need other players to win on their own merits. For now, I’m cheering whole heartedly for OpenAI to catch up, but in the meantime — give me another Fable reset please. (Video Credit: Bloomberg)
0:24

What has become clear with the Sol and Fable releases: Anthropic, has pulled into the lead by at least 1 full cycle — and this is bad. Mythos is already several months old, and while Sol is good I would still pick Fable for ~50-55% of tasks. Meanwhile, Anthropic, has not been resting, they'll have another model here soon enough (and once again tell everyone why its so scary - please, flog me daddy). Anthropic being in the lead is dangerous. It gives them the very power we shouldn’t trust them with. Dario himself said: “Now that we are in a leading position, I, and Daniella, are trying to move the dial even further towards being careful. Thats what the Mythos release was about. It’s very hard to do something like that if you’re not the leading player” He's not wrong. Being the leading player has given Anthropic the ability to push this agenda hard. He is a true believer in the dangers of AI, but frighteningly believes that the only mitigation full control by a small number of people, him being one of them - if not the chief. He really believes that. If you think back on the tiff with the Department of War, Dario reportedly said he would be willing to give them letters of exception to the terms of service on a case by case basis if they just ask — who does that empower? Having Fable removed led to a new process be imposed on their competitors (OpenAI with 5.6). This wasn’t a mistake like so many people thought it was. They didn’t poke the bear only to get their heads ripped off. Nope, its was a honeypot and the administration fell for it. The frustrating thing is, Dario is right, no one can push back on this agenda because Anthripic is in the lead. We desperately need competition to keep AI well distributed. I’ve heard rumors that the Trump administration could try to use antitrust against Anthropic, but that would be a huge mistake and feed the very kind of institutional control that Dario so very much wants. We need other players to win on their own merits. For now, I’m cheering whole heartedly for OpenAI to catch up, but in the meantime — give me another Fable reset please. (Video Credit: Bloomberg)

Justin Schroeder

75,271 次观看 • 24 天前

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."
1:25

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

DogeDesigner

236,118 次观看 • 11 天前

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”
1:43

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”

The All-In Podcast

220,049 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.
2:15

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "GPT 5.6 is 54% more efficient on agentic coding, and it's still the best on the market for half the cost." AI spend has never mattered as much as it does today. As a result the models keep getting better and cheaper at the same time. This is going to widen the gap between the people using AI agents and everyone else, because now it's not just powerful, it's cheap. That's exactly why i wrote a full step by step guide on agents, what they are and how to build your own from scratch. Read it below.

Anatoli Kopadze

91,518 次观看 • 24 天前

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."
1:59

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."

Big Brain AI

52,726 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sam Altman will give himself 7% of Open AI which at its current valuation of $150B would be $10.5B in shares Sam Altman on taking shares in OpenAI just 4 months ago: “It's so deeply unimaginable to people to say i don’t really need more money... If I were to say I'm going to try and make a trillion dollars with OpenAI it would save a lot of conspiracy theories” — All-In Podcast, May 2024 I'm a capitalist and I love people getting rich of their businesses What I personally don't like is the snakey ways Sam is doing all this in You never know if he's telling the truth or not It's fine to get rich, just say you wanna get rich, you're changing the world, you should get rewarded but don't lie
1:13

Sam Altman will give himself 7% of Open AI which at its current valuation of $150B would be $10.5B in shares Sam Altman on taking shares in OpenAI just 4 months ago: “It's so deeply unimaginable to people to say i don’t really need more money... If I were to say I'm going to try and make a trillion dollars with OpenAI it would save a lot of conspiracy theories” — All-In Podcast, May 2024 I'm a capitalist and I love people getting rich of their businesses What I personally don't like is the snakey ways Sam is doing all this in You never know if he's telling the truth or not It's fine to get rich, just say you wanna get rich, you're changing the world, you should get rewarded but don't lie

@levelsio

5,890,750 次观看 • 1 年前

China will crash the US stock market this year. They're dumping SOTA open-source models on the US, nearly as good as the frontier labs, basically free. Nobody can refuse cutting a $100M AI bill down to $5M. Once that deal is on the table for everyone, Anthropic and OpenAI can't justify their prices, or their valuations. The bubble isn't AI. It's the price of AI. And it's about to pop.
0:33

China will crash the US stock market this year. They're dumping SOTA open-source models on the US, nearly as good as the frontier labs, basically free. Nobody can refuse cutting a $100M AI bill down to $5M. Once that deal is on the table for everyone, Anthropic and OpenAI can't justify their prices, or their valuations. The bubble isn't AI. It's the price of AI. And it's about to pop.

Ben Cera

545,104 次观看 • 1 个月前

Is OpenAI going to outcompete AI startups? "I feel like Sam Altman has talked about this a bunch. It's not enough to drop AI in your business. You have to actually build a business. I don't think OpenAI is necessarily out to get all the startups. I actually think that on the API side, they very much hope that a lot of them do really, really well." Garry Tan on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast
1:02

Is OpenAI going to outcompete AI startups? "I feel like Sam Altman has talked about this a bunch. It's not enough to drop AI in your business. You have to actually build a business. I don't think OpenAI is necessarily out to get all the startups. I actually think that on the API side, they very much hope that a lot of them do really, really well." Garry Tan on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast

Overlap: Business & Tech

75,193 次观看 • 1 年前

“I was born on the same land that these people were born in.” “Why is it that it's completely fine for them to critique this country and say, "Oh, it's going to hell, it's going to hell, they're letting the boats in.” But when I say something critical of this country, [they say] "who are you to say this about our great nation?" - Bob Vylan Why? Skin colour…This is the level of their logic.
1:34

“I was born on the same land that these people were born in.” “Why is it that it's completely fine for them to critique this country and say, "Oh, it's going to hell, it's going to hell, they're letting the boats in.” But when I say something critical of this country, [they say] "who are you to say this about our great nation?" - Bob Vylan Why? Skin colour…This is the level of their logic.

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

320,689 次观看 • 9 个月前

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.
3:27

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.

Curtis Houck

175,437 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI) : the idea guys are the ones who win and get funded in the age of AI spoiler ; all you need an idea and think clearly , ai will build it this guy just handed out the hidden cheat code on how to think with AI without rotting your brain bookmark this for the week
17:25

Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI) : the idea guys are the ones who win and get funded in the age of AI spoiler ; all you need an idea and think clearly , ai will build it this guy just handed out the hidden cheat code on how to think with AI without rotting your brain bookmark this for the week

Avid

47,644 次观看 • 3 个月前

Threadguy explains why everyone will pretend they didn't see the Saylor blowup coming "Let's say this thing really does blow up. Saylor death spirals, the whole thing comes apart. Economists are going to look back years from now and say, wow, the people of the 2020s were so retarded, how did they not see this coming? And the answer is everybody did." "People thought it was a good investment, but the ones who thought that took the stance of, they have enough cash for a year or two and then we get out. It's going to end terrible, it's a bad idea, but for six, maybe twelve months it's going to be great. It's free money for a year and then it blows up, and by then it's not my problem." "So they'll look back and ask how these guys were dumb enough to fund the whole stretch thing, but in reality everybody knew. The people buying it knew, the people selling it knew, the people on the sidelines knew, the people that wanted to buy it knew. I feel like everybody had the same stance on this. It was more or less, I don't know how it's going to blow up, but it's not going to end well. It's going to be fine for six months. To me, that was the perspective."
1:24

Threadguy explains why everyone will pretend they didn't see the Saylor blowup coming "Let's say this thing really does blow up. Saylor death spirals, the whole thing comes apart. Economists are going to look back years from now and say, wow, the people of the 2020s were so retarded, how did they not see this coming? And the answer is everybody did." "People thought it was a good investment, but the ones who thought that took the stance of, they have enough cash for a year or two and then we get out. It's going to end terrible, it's a bad idea, but for six, maybe twelve months it's going to be great. It's free money for a year and then it blows up, and by then it's not my problem." "So they'll look back and ask how these guys were dumb enough to fund the whole stretch thing, but in reality everybody knew. The people buying it knew, the people selling it knew, the people on the sidelines knew, the people that wanted to buy it knew. I feel like everybody had the same stance on this. It was more or less, I don't know how it's going to blow up, but it's not going to end well. It's going to be fine for six months. To me, that was the perspective."

Kai

32,114 次观看 • 1 个月前

Campos: I'd say pretty much everyone in the room supported what I had to say...I think it's less of a question of if they supported me, and more about their willingness to say the quiet part out loud. I think it's very easy for me to make those kinds of remarks when my livelihood does not rely on corporate media and whoever is pulling the strings at every outlet. So it's a lot scarier for them to speak out against the direction of CBS, especially those who work directly under it. But that's not to say that they don't oppose what's going on. It's just that oftentimes they lack the courage, or there's too much on the line for them to say something about it. And that's not me saying it's a good thing that they're not saying anything — it's just the reality.
1:34

Campos: I'd say pretty much everyone in the room supported what I had to say...I think it's less of a question of if they supported me, and more about their willingness to say the quiet part out loud. I think it's very easy for me to make those kinds of remarks when my livelihood does not rely on corporate media and whoever is pulling the strings at every outlet. So it's a lot scarier for them to speak out against the direction of CBS, especially those who work directly under it. But that's not to say that they don't oppose what's going on. It's just that oftentimes they lack the courage, or there's too much on the line for them to say something about it. And that's not me saying it's a good thing that they're not saying anything — it's just the reality.

MeidasTouch

60,848 次观看 • 2 个月前

Noem: I think a lot of people and even you yourself called this situation something very different and untruthful about what it was. Tapper: What did I say that was untruthful? Noem: That this was not a correct definition of what was happening on the ground Tapper: I said that your your description, they were attempting to push out their vehicle and a woman attacked them and those surrounding them and attempted to run them over and ram them with their vehicle is not what we see on the videotape. And it's not.
1:34

Noem: I think a lot of people and even you yourself called this situation something very different and untruthful about what it was. Tapper: What did I say that was untruthful? Noem: That this was not a correct definition of what was happening on the ground Tapper: I said that your your description, they were attempting to push out their vehicle and a woman attacked them and those surrounding them and attempted to run them over and ram them with their vehicle is not what we see on the videotape. And it's not.

Acyn

1,002,888 次观看 • 6 个月前

Neil Oliver on the UK government's imminent attempt to impose mandatory digital ID: "There's going to be mass refusal, mass non-compliance... It's going to be a disaster for them, and will probably... be what brings them down." "Anybody that accepts a digital ID is slapping handcuffs around their own wrists." "It's the end of freedom. It's the end of choice. It's the worst possible decision that any... freedom loving person could possibly make." "I was pessimistic about it for a while—I'm not anymore. We've got them on this. We have them surrounded. Their arguments don't stack up. None of the reasons that they've put forward for doing this make any kind of sense." "The very idea that this is going to tackle the people arriving by boats... is absolute nonsense. It was never supposed to do that." "The desire to bring forward the digital ID was there years ago. And it was understood... that the British people would not accept it. So problems had to be fomented to make people desperate to accept this as a solution." "Hence the opening up of the borders, and the mass immigration onto these shores." "The hope has been that people would accept the digital ID as this solution to the problem. But it's entirely bogus." "All people have to do is not comply and this thing falls flat on its face. And I am convinced that that is what's going to happen." Credit: Neil Oliver Bev Turner
4:17

Neil Oliver on the UK government's imminent attempt to impose mandatory digital ID: "There's going to be mass refusal, mass non-compliance... It's going to be a disaster for them, and will probably... be what brings them down." "Anybody that accepts a digital ID is slapping handcuffs around their own wrists." "It's the end of freedom. It's the end of choice. It's the worst possible decision that any... freedom loving person could possibly make." "I was pessimistic about it for a while—I'm not anymore. We've got them on this. We have them surrounded. Their arguments don't stack up. None of the reasons that they've put forward for doing this make any kind of sense." "The very idea that this is going to tackle the people arriving by boats... is absolute nonsense. It was never supposed to do that." "The desire to bring forward the digital ID was there years ago. And it was understood... that the British people would not accept it. So problems had to be fomented to make people desperate to accept this as a solution." "Hence the opening up of the borders, and the mass immigration onto these shores." "The hope has been that people would accept the digital ID as this solution to the problem. But it's entirely bogus." "All people have to do is not comply and this thing falls flat on its face. And I am convinced that that is what's going to happen." Credit: Neil Oliver Bev Turner

Wide Awake Media

789,772 次观看 • 9 个月前

Sam Altman: “Concentration of power with AI is a terrifying thing.” "A lot of the talk about safety concerns is well-founded, and then a lot of it is about people that just really, even if it's slightly subconscious, wanna concentrate power. I don't think anyone should want to live in a world of AI overlords, where someone is making decisions for all of the future, and in exchange for a cure for cancer, which obviously is a wonderful thing, we collectively cede all agency. I am terrified of a world where the very real fears of AI are used as a way to say, “Only this small group of people can have it because it's too dangerous, and only they understand it. But don't worry, they're gonna make the right decisions for all of us.” I was a child of the internet. There were no rules. It was amazing, and I think it's critical we preserve that spirit with AI."
1:17

Sam Altman: “Concentration of power with AI is a terrifying thing.” "A lot of the talk about safety concerns is well-founded, and then a lot of it is about people that just really, even if it's slightly subconscious, wanna concentrate power. I don't think anyone should want to live in a world of AI overlords, where someone is making decisions for all of the future, and in exchange for a cure for cancer, which obviously is a wonderful thing, we collectively cede all agency. I am terrified of a world where the very real fears of AI are used as a way to say, “Only this small group of people can have it because it's too dangerous, and only they understand it. But don't worry, they're gonna make the right decisions for all of us.” I was a child of the internet. There were no rules. It was amazing, and I think it's critical we preserve that spirit with AI."

Patrick OShaughnessy

67,000 次观看 • 6 天前