Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Two promotion-chasing sides face off tonight: Middlesbrough vs Ipswich 🤜🤛 Ryan explains how a win could prove 'Boro are "legit automatic promotion contenders" New Preview Show 👉

19,072 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The cancer was gone and the doctor was flummoxed. "You could hear tears coming through the phone. Like, you could hear them crying with a smile. It was a really moving moment." ~Bates Anecdotes: Healing very aggressive, Stage 4 metastatic cancer of the spine (bone cancer) and Stage 4 liver cancer, using the Bengston Healing Method. To me, this stuff is much more important than UFOs. Why? Because if it's legit - and I have no doubt that it is - then besides healing people, it tells us that our model of the physical Universe is woefully incomplete. UFOs may also prove that one day but the healing phenomenon is something we can test right now, over and over and over. Bengston (and his small group of colleagues) needs help! He cant be the only one doing these lab experiments. And if we had the entire world looking at this, maybe we could figure out why and how it works? But...stigma. And that stigma is alive and very well in this community. Most will blow this off as "woo" and reject it. There's more data to prove that this method works than there is to prove that some UFOs are controlled by a NHI. I have zero doubt Bengston's method works on mice with cancer, but humans are harder to prove because there are so many variables. Did the person change their diet or attitude, or did something else spark their immune system and cause the remission? Was it the healing method that did it? In these two anecdotes, the cancer was pretty extreme so SOMETHING out of the ordinary seems to have occurred.

Joe Murgia

64,738 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨🇺🇸 SHAWN RYAN VS DAN CRENSHAW: TWO NAVY SEALS, ONE UGLY FEUD Two former Navy SEALs are at war, and it's playing out publicly. Here's the full breakdown so you can decide for yourself who's in the wrong. How it started: Shawn Ryan, host of a popular podcast with 5.5 million subscribers, criticized Congressman Dan Crenshaw over alleged insider trading. Crenshaw responded by sending Ryan a cease and desist letter threatening to sue if he didn't take down the content and issue a public apology. Ryan didn't back down. He made a public rebuttal and invited Crenshaw on his show to discuss the allegations man-to-man. Crenshaw accepted. The interview was set for January 2nd. Then things fell apart. Shawn Ryan's case: Ryan says every guest on his show since episode 10 has signed a standard release form. Trump, JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll, Mike Waltz. No exceptions. He sent Crenshaw the form on December 26th. Crenshaw's attorneys sent back redlines requesting modifications. Ryan refused to give a congressman special treatment that he doesn't give presidents and cabinet members. Ryan claims he predicted Crenshaw's team would send a last-minute email on New Year's Eve hoping no one would see it. At 10 PM on December 31st, Crenshaw's campaign manager emailed asking about hotel pickup with no mention of signed release forms. Ryan's conclusion: Crenshaw is a bully who threatens lawsuits to silence critics. When that didn't work, he hid behind paperwork to avoid the interview. "I gave you the opportunity to be a man. You didn't take it. I gave you the opportunity to speak to five and a half million people and prove to them that you are not insider trading. That's a fucking gift. And you turned it down." Ryan warned his audience that anyone who criticizes Crenshaw will receive a threatening letter, but "Dan doesn't have the courage to actually do anything else." "You've been exposed, Dan. Bye." Dan Crenshaw's case: Crenshaw fired back two hours later, claiming Ryan is making "false claims that are easily disprovable." He says his team agreed to all of Ryan's terms on Monday. The only item they initially redlined was ATV liability waivers since they had no plans to ride ATVs. When Ryan's team objected, they dropped it and agreed to sign everything as written. According to Crenshaw, the only special request came from Ryan's attorney, who asked them to waive the Congressional "speech and debate clause." His team agreed and asked for updated language. Ryan's lawyer said Monday he'd send it. He never did. Crenshaw says the New Year's Eve email was simply his campaign manager confirming travel arrangements, not a last-minute stalling tactic. "Sean, I'm giving you one last chance. I can still make my flight to Nashville." Crenshaw took to X and uploaded a full thread with email receipts between both teams, claiming the evidence proves Ryan manufactured an excuse to back out. "Had a feeling you'd back out. My attorney agreed to all your terms on MONDAY. No response from your people. You never sent us anything to sign." Where it stands: The interview is dead. Both men claim the other sabotaged it. Both have receipts they say prove their case. Who do you believe? Source: Shawn Ryan Dan Crenshaw

Mario Nawfal

209,114 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨🚨 BREAKING NEWS — TBILISI, GEORGIA 🇬🇪🔥 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 FOREIGN FLAGS FLOOD THE STREETS AS PROTESTS TURN GEOPOLITICAL Tbilisi, tonight. Thousands of protesters have again occupied Rustaveli Avenue, demanding the withdrawal of Georgia’s foreign-influence transparency law. But tonight’s demonstrations crossed a new line — not in size, but in symbolism. Alongside Georgian flags, the crowd is dominated by EU 🇪🇺, Ukrainian 🇺🇦, and U.S. 🇺🇸 flags. This is no longer framed as a purely domestic protest. ⚠️ WHAT THEY WANT — AND HOW THEY SHOW IT The demonstrations oppose a law requiring NGOs and media outlets to disclose foreign funding if more than 20% of their finances come from abroad. Authorities say it’s transparency. Protest leaders call it “anti-European.” The message on the street is explicit: this protest chooses sides. The flags are not decoration. They are a declaration — of alignment, of loyalty, of direction. 💥 WHY THIS IS CONTROVERSIAL In most countries, waving foreign flags at a protest against your own government would raise uncomfortable questions. In Georgia tonight, it has become the headline. Supporters say it proves Georgia’s “European future.” Critics say it confirms what many suspected: this is not just civic anger — it is a geopolitical campaign. That tension exploded further after authorities froze the accounts of organizations accused of financing protest logistics, prompting immediate condemnation from Western NGOs and media — but no denial of foreign funding. 🌍 A FAULT LINE OPENS Georgia now stands in a familiar Eastern European dilemma: •sovereignty vs alignment •voters vs NGO networks •elections vs permanent street pressure The street chants speak of democracy. The flags speak of geopolitics. And the government is now openly challenging who really holds power. 🔥 THE QUESTION HANGING OVER TBILISI TONIGHT If a protest against a transparency law cannot exist without foreign symbols, whose influence is it actually resisting? The streets are full. The message is sharpened. And Georgia’s political crisis just entered a far more dangerous phase. Developing. — Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit

Slavic Networks

68,874 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This is the oldest surviving icon of Christ, the oldest painted portrait of the face of Jesus that has come down to us. It was made around 1500 years ago, and if you cover one half of the face, then the other, you are looking at two different men... It's called Christ Pantocrator, a Greek title meaning "Ruler of All," and it was painted in the sixth century, around the year 550, most likely in a workshop in Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire. It was almost certainly sent as an imperial gift to a remote new monastery being built in the Egyptian desert. It has hung there, in the Monastery of Saint Catherine at the foot of Mount Sinai, ever since. For roughly 1,500 years, it has never left. That it survived at all is remarkable. In the eighth and ninth centuries, the Byzantine Empire went through a violent period called Iconoclasm, in which religious images were condemned as idolatry and destroyed by the thousands. Almost every icon of this age in the empire was burned. But Saint Catherine's lay far out in the desert, beyond the reach of the emperors and their decrees, so this one was spared. It is one of the very few images of its kind on earth to come down to us intact. But the truly haunting thing is the face. Look at it, and the two sides do not match. On the side where Christ holds the Gospel, his features are harder, sterner, the brow raised, the eye larger and more severe, the face of a judge who sees everything. On the side where he raises his hand in blessing, the expression softens, calm and merciful, the face of a savior. One half is divine authority. The other is human compassion. Most scholars believe this was entirely deliberate. The icon was painted not long after the Church had formally defined that Christ was at once fully God and fully man, two natures joined in one person. And so the artist, it is thought, built that doctrine directly into the face, splitting it in two so that the same man could be, in a single gaze, both merciful and just, both human and divine... I started my newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you'd like to be part of, you can join through the link in my bio, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible. Thanks for reading.

James Lucas

662,954 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Pending bills at County Goverments, Parastatals and even national Goverment. I get inbox messages day in day out, its anguish and sheer torture that once successful entrepreneurs have been reduced to paupers. Counties is not that they are not getting the funding but they are busy paying their close buddies. When there is regime change you are cooked since the governor treats all previous suppliers as potential thieves. As hotels most of us ask for upfront payment, please dont pretend you are doing business when you will not even be paid . I recall as a hotel GM on several occasion in my younger days "prominent " elected leaders trying to toss a personal cheque at us knowing very well that it will not have cleared by the time they are checking out . As a hotel GM I never shied off to come and face these bullies since they intimidate my young receptionist to cave in. I used to ask them a very simple question would they attempt to pay using a personal cheque after shopping at Nakumatt ? Only then do they get into default setting and come down to earth. A good friend of min closed his travel agency office when several counties at the coast decided to delay his payments for air tickets. Just like that Ksh6m up in smoke . I know of an SME chasing payment in Nbi for the past 4 years. She was being auctioned and could see the pain in her face If there is one thing national government ought to do is to compel counties to pay all the SMES's and money would circulate. How do you procure services with no intention to pay? What has been your experience? problem shared is problem halved . As always I choose to remain an optimist that genuine suppliers majority who are SME's should get paid . My two cent advice , please don't get overly excited by that LPO. It could be your first step to insanity be very afraid . Council of Governors SpiceFM Eric Latiff

Mohammed Hersi : Mr Optimist

154,642 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

KIWIS NO LONGER DECIDE NZ ELECTIONS. 💥THAT SHOULD TERRIFY EVERYONE.💥 Immigrants will decide our fate as Kiwis...Indians & Chinese.... …because National and Labour have made them the swing vote. Here’s the cold, hard truth: 👉 Over 300,000 non-citizen residents can vote in New Zealand elections. 👉 And 1 in 4 people living in NZ today were born overseas…the highest in our history. 👉 In the last election, fewer than 70,000 votes separated the major blocs. Do the maths: The resident-voter bloc is FOUR TIMES bigger than the margin that decides governments. Kiwis are no longer the ones deciding elections. With the two big parties neck-and-neck in the polls, the immigrant vote becomes the kingmaker. This is why Luxon is endlessly wooing the Indian and Chinese communities. This is why every weekend he’s at another cultural festival. This is why Kiwis are being ignored, overlooked, and sidelined. Politicians know the truth: The immigrant vote now decides elections. And when power is at stake… they’ll sell off NZ to the highest bidder. They’re not serving New Zealand… They’re chasing the immigrant vote like addicts chasing their next hit. Block voting. Ethnic bargains. Backroom deals. Foreign influence shaping OUR future. Meanwhile, ordinary Kiwis…taxpayers, workers, families…are treated like an afterthought. And here’s the biggest rort in the whole system: Citizens vote… but residents do too. People with no long-term stake in this land hold the exact same political power as Kiwi families who built it. How is that democracy? How is that protecting the Kiwi Way of Life? That must change. CITIZENS VOTE…RESIDENTS DON’T. If you’re not a citizen…you shouldn’t vote. And if you are a newly-arrived citizen, you should live in NZ for at least 20 years before you have the right to decide our government. Assimilation first. Loyalty first. Roots first. THEN…and only then…the right to vote. Because if you haven’t lived through the good, the bad, the hard, the history…you shouldn’t be shaping New Zealand’s future. And the current case in the courts proves everything we’ve been warning about. The Ōtara-Papatoetoe election scandal STINKS. Corrupt Indian candidates rorting the NZ voting system. Stealing votes. Harvesting votes. Manipulating the system for political gain. This is electoral corruption…and it’s exactly what happens when politicians chase votes over protecting their own people. I’m saying what every Kiwi is thinking but too afraid to say: New Zealand is being politically taken over… and the two major parties are cheering it on. But that’s why 31 January matters. That’s why True Patriots are rising. That’s why we fight. Because if WE don’t stand up now… we lose NZ forever. 31 JAN…NZ DAY…KEEP NZ, NZ. The People vs The Political Machine.

Brian Tamaki

36,866 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten