Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two things we have objected to as preliminary issues: 1. The requirement that only the head or chairperson or president of the political parties could attend. 2. The rather pedantic insistence on two persons per party has no legal basis or sanction, which is most unfortunate. We have requested...

10,563 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

6 Comments

PallaviCT's profile picture
PallaviCT1 year ago

Why is CONgis so AFRAID of EC doing its work?🤔🤔 It’s AFRAID that the VOTE BANK that its taken care of, will get affected? 🤔🤔

itdoesntmatter's profile picture
itdoesntmatter1 year ago

so worried that all the illegal will lose their votes.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's profile picture
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra1 year ago

महाराष्ट्र में 3 महीनों में 767 किसानों ने आत्महत्या कर ली, यानी रोजाना 8 किसान अपनी जिंदगी खत्म कर रहे हैं। आर्थिक तंगी, बढ़ता कर्ज, बर्बाद होती फसलें, खाद-बीज-डीजल की महंगाई और फसलों का उचित मूल्य न मिलना किसानों के गले की फांस बन गया है। नरेंद्र मोदी जी की सरकार ने चंद अरबपतियों के तो 16 लाख करोड़ रुपये माफ कर दिए, लेकिन जिन किसानों से 'दोगुनी आय' का वादा किया था, छोटी सी मदद देकर उनकी जान बचाने के बारे में भी कभी नहीं सोचा।

Congress's profile picture
Congress1 year ago

Congress President Shri @kharge unveils the statue of former CM of Andhra Pradesh Shri K. Rosaiah in Hyderabad. 📍 Telangana

Gaurav Gogoi's profile picture
Gaurav Gogoi1 year ago

In his first year as Leader of the Opposition, @RahulGandhi ji has held the government accountable, defended democratic values, and amplified the voices of ordinary Indians. A steady hand in uncertain times. Rooted in the Constitution. Driven by the people.

Abhishek Singhvi's profile picture
Abhishek Singhvi1 year ago

As he completes one year as the LoP, Shri @RahulGandhi has been a voice of conscience, a shield of the Constitution, and a beacon for India’s silent millions. Like a lighthouse amid storms, he has stood firm, fearless, and unbowed. More power to his resolve and vision for INDIA.

Related Videos

VIDEO | Delhi: TMC MP Sagarika Ghosh on 23 political parties along with an Independent MP sending a joint letter to Chief Justice Surya Kant on the SIR process, the role of the Election Commission and other election-related issues, says, "There is complete unity in the non-NDA opposition. Complete unity on the manner in which the BJP is manipulating electoral rolls through the SIR exercise, manipulating the voting process through the SIR exercise, manipulating uh elections through the SIR exercise and hijacking democracy. The BJP is hijacking democracy through the SIR exercise. There is complete unity in the non-NDA opposition on this issue. In an unprecedented move, this has never happened before, 23 opposition parties have written to the Chief Justice of India, have written a joint letter, in which the DMK and the Aam Aadmi Party have also signed that letter appealing to the judiciary on this manipulation of the electoral process and the manner in which the BJP is misusing the SIR with the Election Commission as its 12th man, misusing the SIR, snatching away the right to vote from lakhs of people. Lakhs of people have been disenfranchised in the Bengal election. Lakhs of people have lost their right to vote. So, we have for the first time opposition parties have written to the Chief Justice of India. We have sent letter today, appealing to the judiciary, appealing to the judicial conscience that please consider this manipulation, this gross violation of the right to vote of every citizen of India, which the BJP is doing in order to benefit politically." #TMC #ElectionCommission #SIR (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

11,382 views • 17 days ago

Today, we had a detailed meeting with our 12 PCC Presidents, CLP leaders, General Secretaries, and senior leaders regarding the SIR exercise. The general feeling within the Pradesh Congress Committee is that the Election Commission is intentionally trying to delete the votes of certain sections of society. The very design of the SIR exercise is aimed at targeting and deleting specific votes. We witnessed this in Bihar as well, and now they are planning to implement it in 12 states. Yesterday, they announced a different Special Revision (SR) for Assam. This is a sinister attempt by the Election Commission to undermine democracy in this country. Their actions are unethical and undemocratic. In Kerala, local body elections are going on. The first phase of elections is happening on 9th December, and BLOs are giving the final list on that date. The Kerala Assembly has passed a resolution to postpone the SIR exercise, but the EC is not listening. BLOs are committing suicide due to extreme work pressure; they are being told to complete the exercise within one month. Why such hurry? It is clear that EC is working on behalf of the BJP and Narendra Modi. Today, we discussed all these issues, and we will fight this. The Congress party will hold a massive rally in the first week of December at Ramleela Maidan in Delhi, where we will expose the Election Commission once again. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal 📍Indira Bhawan, New Delhi

Congress

83,360 views • 8 months ago

.Election Commission of India Chief Electoral Officer, Andhra Pradesh This video exposes exactly what YSRCP has been warning about repeatedly. In the name of the SIR process, official Enumeration Forms collected from voters have reached the hands of the TDP/MyTDP team in Atmakur constituency. Private persons are sitting inside the Secretariat and openly entering voter details into the MyTDP App. When questioned, they reportedly say they came because Anam sent them. How did confidential SIR forms, collected as part of an Election Commission process, reach the hands of TDP-linked private persons? YSRCP has already submitted multiple complaints to the Election Commission regarding the illegal use of the MyTDP App in the SIR process, political interference by TDP leaders, pressure on BLOs, and misuse of official election machinery. But till now, no serious enquiry or visible action has been taken. This inaction is emboldening the ruling TDP. They are misusing power, officials and government premises to divert voter data into their party app and target votes opposed to them. This is not a mere local irregularity. This is a direct attack on the neutrality of the electoral roll revision process. The SIR process is supposed to be under the exclusive control of the Election Commission. It cannot be converted into a TDP data collection drive. It cannot be allowed to become a tool to identify, target and delete the votes of YSRCP leaders, cadres, supporters, sympathisers and voters opposed to the ruling party. We demand immediate action: 1.Seize all SIR forms handled by private/TDP-linked persons in this incident. 2.Conduct an urgent enquiry into how official Enumeration Forms reached the MyTDP team. 3.Identify and suspend officials who allowed private persons to handle SIR forms. 4.Ban the use of MyTDP App or any party-linked app in the SIR process. 5.Order a statewide probe into all complaints filed by YSRCP on MyTDP App misuse. 6.Ensure that every genuine voter’s right is protected and no vote is deleted through political manipulation. The Election Commission must act now. Silence will only encourage further misuse. The integrity of the electoral roll and the voting rights of people in Andhra Pradesh are at stake.

YSR Congress Party

31,487 views • 8 days ago

Professor Lovemore Madhuku in his Own Words Making the Case for Parliament to Indirectly Elect the President as an Electoral College: “We must not put in the Constitution of the country a provision that is dependant on what happens in a political party. That’s the point I’m making. We must never say in our Constitution of Zimbabwe that if a sitting President dies or resigns, we will wait to hear what the political party of that President is saying. No. That is not the best way of running a country. Political parties remain the preserve of those people who are in those political parties. But the country is run on the basis of either an election by the people—direct election—or you have Parliament as an institution sitting as an electoral college. Where parties have influence, they must do the influence within Parliament, but never to allow the political party to sit there to say I’m giving you this President, and so forth. That’s the point I’m making. And on that point, I’m making it right across the world; that’s what they do.” - Professor Madhuku, addressing a “Heal Zimbabwe Trust” public meeting in Harare on 22 February 2020. COMMENT: Professor Lovemore Madhuku’s 2020 remarks make a clear, powerful and enduring case for Clause 3 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B.I. Bill, 2026. This clause replaces the direct election of the President with an indirect election by Parliament sitting jointly as an electoral college; both after every general election and, when necessary, to fill any vacancy in the office of President. The current direct election of the President was first introduced in anticipation of a legislated one-party-one-man rule through Constitution Amendment No. 7, Act 1987 in the old Lancaster Constitution repealed in 2013. Professor Madhuku put it plainly: The Constitution should not—as it currently does— depend on the internal decisions of a political party to select a successor to the President of the country. When a sitting President dies, resigns or is removed, the nation should not have to wait and hear what that President’s political party “is saying.” That is not a constitutionally proper way to run a country. Political parties exist for their own members. The country, however, belongs to all Zimbabweans. The proper solution is straightforward: Parliament—the institution chosen by the people—should act as the electoral college. Inside that open forum, parties may exercise their influence transparently and accountably. No party should ever stand outside the Constitution and simply “give” the nation its next leader. This principle is not abstract. Worldwide, presidential by-elections to fill mid-term vacancies are extremely rare. Most stable presidential systems instead use automatic succession by a deputy or, increasingly, allow the legislature to elect a successor who serves out the remainder of the term. These arrangements place national continuity and stability above partisan interests. Clause 3 of the Bill follows exactly this proven path. By giving Parliament the clear duty to elect the President—whether at the start of a new term or in an unforeseen vacancy—Zimbabwe will secure stronger democratic stability, and keep the highest office firmly within the people’s constitutional framework rather than the private control of any single party. In short, Clause 3 is a mature, practical and principled reform that directly honours Professor Madhuku’s wise 2020 counsel. As such, it deserves the full support of every well-meaning Zimbabwean who values good governance, democratic constitutionalism, institutional integrity and the long-term strength of the country’s democracy in the national interest!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

88,092 views • 2 months ago

Election fraud in Guatemala… if happens here, it will happen in the US in 2024. The facts: 1. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (Like the FEC in the US) is in charge of the election, and in this election they didn't had an IT Director, the previous one is currently in court prosecuted because of "anomalies" in the previous election. How they managed to have control on the different voting systems? 2. Before our General Elections, and after the call for elections when all parties were already registered and participating, some were suspended and dismissed by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE), which the Electoral and Political Parties Law (LEPP) forbids, some parties appealed to the Constitutional Court, as their right to vote and be elected was being violated, and to this day, haven't get any response from the Court. 3. On June 25, the General Elections were held. There were thousands of complaints from almost all party poll watchers. Among these complaints, there were reports of party poll watchers being kidnapped during the countdown; records being edited in the absence of party poll watchers, changing the votes; data tampering during data entry into the system; forgery of the original physical records; polling station officers refusing to provide the necessary paper forms to report this incidents, etc. The very same day, and the next day, many party poll watchers reported these incidents with the polling station officers to the Public Ministry (Kind of the General Attorney's Office in the US) and to the Constitutional Court. This is well documented in the video included in this post. 4. The Constitutional Court sent its ruling to the Supreme Court of Justice, and they ordered to the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the Electoral Boards to compare the original records (white papers) with the copies (yellow papers), and to recount the votes, in a hearing, in the presence of party poll watchers and the media. The Electoral Boards didn't comply with the ruling, and the media was almost absent or didn't publish the complaints and findings, producing a general discontent and distrust in the electoral process. Some party poll watchers escalated their reports to the Public Ministry, reporting the misdeeds of the polling station officers. Several party poll watchers called for a repeat of the elections due to all the flaws found, and of course, the media pundits created the false narrative that auditing the records and recounting the votes was going against what was voted in the ballot boxes and against the electoral law, when in reality, it's a way to make the process more transparent and it is clearly stipulated in Article III of the Electoral and Political Parties Law 5. According to the dubious results, from the more than 20 candidates, for the first time in the country's history, the majority of the votes were null, the winner was null, which is a clear indication of the widespread discontent and mistrust for the Guatemalan political class, but because none of the candidates got more than 50%+1 of the votes, a second round is needed. Is worth noting that the second place after null was held by the UNE party, a left-wing political candidate Sandra Torres got it, and the third place in these dubious results was obtained by the political party "Movimiento Semilla", an extreme left-wing political party with a presidential candidate virtually unknown throughout the entire country, this raised suspicions among absolutely all Guatemalans, except for the typical media pundits who tried to justify it at all costs with any baseless excuse or narrative. 6. After some pressure from foreign forces, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled that The Electoral Boards comply with what was needed, but this was a lie, they were pressured not to proceed with the legal process. It is worth noting that "Movimiento Semilla" party, is well connected with international forces, most of their members have belonged to NGOs founded by none other that George Soros through his Open Society Foundations, so is most of our media pundits, and most of the college professors, for instance, former Secretary-General and current Semilla's candidate for Congress, Samuel Andrés Pérez Alvarez, is son of the Abraham Samuel Pérez de León, who has been an advisor to the World Bank and the UNDP/PNUD; he is a professor in Universidad Rafael Landívar which receives grants from the Open Society Foundations for the "independent news site" called Plaza Pública where both father and son write their columns. 7. During the process, Guatemalan prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche issued a public statement exposing an open case against "Movimiento Semilla" party, a process that started around 2018, way before the elections. Curruchiche showed legal documents and evidence from the forensic agencies' expert examination, showing forgery of signatures in the party affiliation process, affiliating dead people, affiliations only with signature and without names. Considering that in Guatemala, in order to have a political party, you have to affiliate certain number of people, failing to do so, makes the legal figure that constitutes the party, lack the necessary foundation, thus, nullifying the party, but again, even without the legal representation, the party appealed to the Constitutional Court, which under foreign pressures, granted protection to the inexistent party, citing that the electoral law establishes that once the election call has been made, parties cannot be canceled. However, they did cancel other parties after the call, demonstrating that there is no equality before the law, and that this party has privileges due to its connections abroad. This was one of the complains of other candidate that was left out of the election on similar grounds. It is worth noting that the prosecutor notified the Supreme Electoral Tribunal about this matters since 2018, and they didn't nullify the party, and it is also worth noting that Semilla was reported for receiving funding from abroad, specifically, from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD), and even tho there was a legal preceding, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal protected Semilla ignoring the law. 8. While all these events were transpiring, after hearing Semilla's almost unknown presidential candidate mention the elections observers from as the ones validating the results, I did a research on who were these election observers sent by the EU, who spare no expense with hundreds of members all over the country in quite expensive cars. It turns out that these observers, just before the election, held a meeting only with Semilla's presidential candidate and with no other candidate, most of its members are in fact, members of the party or acquaintances that have work along in the very same NGOs, and all the "influencers" and young tiktokers that support the party and engaged in smear campaigns against all other parties, were also election observers for and similar NGOs, the case of Romeo Alejandro Méndez Zuñiga who partnered with José Roberto Alejos Cámbara (brother of convicted Gustavo Adolfo Alejos Cámbara) in his NGO of observer called Caminemos Political Association, which has received grants from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD). I wrote a long post with all the evidence, it is in Spanish but you can use any web translator, it includes a great hearing with .Rep. Scott Perry exposing how USAID (which is embedded in all this NGOs) is founding ideological groups in Guatemala: 9. Verifying that political parties comply with the law and do their job properly, without affiliating deceased individuals, without forged signatures, or affiliating only with signatures and without names as Semilla did, is the responsibility of the Registrar of Citizens, Ramiro José Muñoz Jordán, who was ordered by a judge to suspend the Semilla party, if he fail to comply with the ruling, appropriate measures will be issued, possibly facing a warrant, but before he was notified, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal grant him vacations, and his whereabouts are currently unknown. This lead to more distrust in the whole electoral process, and the opacity of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. 10. Recently, the corrupt President Magistrate of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Irma Elizabeth Palencia Orellana, usurping functions, since according to our constitution, international relations are the exclusive domain of the executive branch, called for a statement from the Secretary-General of the OAS, Luis Almagro, who is aligned with the globalists of Semilla. We are experiencing an electoral fraud, one that is fiercely protected by foreign forces who seek impunity for both, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the corruption within the Semilla Party, a fraud strongly defended by the media by not only hiding what truly happened, but also distorting and misrepresenting the actual events and facts with unfounded narratives to manipulate the masses and public opinion, and if it happens here, in this laboratory of so many three letter foreign agencies, it will happen in the USA, as it always does. It happened here in 2019, it happened there in November 2020, it will be the same in 2024 there. Please, address this issue, do your own due diligence, there is a lot to uncover. .Donald Trump Jr. .Marjorie Taylor Greene .Mark R. Levin .GregGutfeld .Jesse Watters .Charlie Kirk .DC_Draino .Terrence K. Williams .Sebastian Gorka DrG .Ted Cruz .Steven Crowder .Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 .Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 .E . .End Wokeness .Tim Pool .James O'Keefe .Robert F. Kennedy Jr .Dr Jordan B Peterson .Ben Shapiro .Lex Fridman .MaryAnastasiaO'Grady .Salomondrin 🤖 .Luis Almagro

Rodrigo Polo

67,745 views • 3 years ago