Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Two visions Unite Under One Name🏆 Introducing Our Competitive Fortnite Roster; - Golden - Ozone - @Scare1x - Mirops #FORCEWIN | TTweaks

50,952 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

So here’s what Mark Carney said in Mississauga. “We will soon also release our Climate Competitiveness Strategy to position Canada as a leader in decarbonization… We’ll look at the interaction between the EV mandate, our clean fuel standards, our investment tax credits, our trade policy—all of those elements. Because what this government is focused on is absolutely results. Not saying something’s going to happen at a certain time, but giving workers and businesses the tools to make it happen.” Sounds impressive, doesn’t it? A “Climate Competitiveness Strategy.” But stop and think about it for more than five seconds. Competitive with who? With China? A country that builds two coal plants a week and couldn’t care less about “decarbonization.” They flood the world with cheap steel, fertilizer, solar panels, and EV batteries—all made with coal power. We shut down our industries in the name of carbon, then buy it all back from Beijing. With India? They’ve made it clear they’re not going to sacrifice growth for carbon targets. They’re building, expanding, modernizing—while Canada is drowning in permits, studies, and red tape. In this country it literally costs a million dollars to move an anthill if you want to build a mine. In India they’d just build the mine. So again—competitive with who? With Europe? We do maybe 7% of our trade with Europe. The real markets are the United States and Asia. And both are playing by completely different rules. Europe’s collapsing under its own green policies; their energy prices are through the roof, their industries are fleeing. And Carney wants to copy that model here. #SMH

Dan Knight

106,031 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

In two predawn operations today, the Coast Guard conducted back-to-back meticulously coordinated boarding of two “ghost fleet” tanker ships— one in the North Atlantic Sea and one in international waters near the Caribbean. Both vessels —the Motor Tanker Bella I and the Motor Taker Sophia—were either last docked in Venezuela or en route to it. Under President Trump’s bold and visionary leadership, US Coast Guard tactical teams worked closely with its counterparts at the Departments of War, Department of Justice and State and used their specialized expertise to conduct these operations and conduct two safe, effective boardings within hours of each other. One of these tankers, Motor Tanker Bella I, has been trying to evade the Coast Guard for weeks, even changing its flag and painting a new name on the hull while being pursued, in a desperate and failed attempt to escape justice. The heroic crew of the USCGC Munro pursued this vessel across the high seas and through treacherous storms— keeping diligent watch, and protecting our country with the determination and patriotism that make Americans proud. These brave men and women deserve our nation’s thanks for their selfless devotion to duty. The world’s criminals are on notice. You can run, but you can’t hide. We will never relent in our mission to protect the American people and disrupt the funding of narco terrorism wherever we find it, period. This is our country’s greatest fighting force at their best. This is America first at sea.

Special Envoy Kristi Noem

1,371,749 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

[WATCH] ON THE MIGRATION MATTER At the end of June, forces under an anti-immigrant banner set out to shut down parts of our country and to sow mayhem. Let us report plainly: they were contained, and the shutdown they promised did not break the back of the Republic. But there was a cost to the good name South Africa has built since 1912. The organisers and funders must understand: they are eroding our standing as a safe home for the tourist and the investor, and isolating us from our own continent and when South Africa stands alone, it will not succeed. We see the patterns for what they are: the agent provocateur, the cheap mob politics of the ballot-chaser, and the poison of ethno-nationalism that would break this country apart. The enforcement of our laws is the work of the State, and of no one else. The authorities have effected some seventy-two thousand deportations of persons here unlawfully — diligent work, yet still under a tenth of the estimated total, a presence that does depress the wages of our workers and the tax base of our services. And we direct a firm word to the employer: the one who knowingly hires the undocumented to work them harder and pay them less is not only breaking the law that employer is depressing wages, starving the fiscus, and sabotaging the economy and the peace of our communities. The exploiter of cheap and unlawful labour is as much the author of our tensions as any smuggler at the border. To our own people we say: be wary of the radicalisation trap. Do not be drawn into public disorder and vigilantism, which earn you a police cell while the true causes of your hardship go untouched. Take your grievance to the ballot, not the streets. For the pressure at our borders is, at root, a continental crisis of economies under strain, of conflict, and of climate shock. A continental problem asks for a continental answer. It is for this reason that the ANC today places before the nation the Continental Compact on Migration in Africa, published in full on our website at where every South African may read it. It faces our people's concerns honestly and answers them in law; it acts on the causes of migration at their source; it manages movement while breaking the trafficking syndicates; and it protects the wages of South African workers. We offer it not as a decree, but for the people to study, to challenge, and to improve. #ANCmediabriefing #RegisterToVoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

58,458 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Starbucks says baristas must write 'Charlie Kirk' on cups if customers ask them to | Samantha Rutt, Daily Mail Starbucks have ordered staff to write the name 'Charlie Kirk' on coffee cups if customers ordered their drink in the name of the murdered conservative activist. The coffee giant took action after a widely-shared TikTok video showed a barista at a California store refusing to write Kirk's name on a cup, claiming it was 'political' and citing company policy. Customers who wish to pay tribute to the late debater by ordering a drink in his name can now do so at any store, Starbucks bosses confirmed on Thursday. The video which triggered the response shows a woman entering a Starbucks location to order a Mint Majesty tea with two honeys - a drink she says was favored by Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative political activist who was shot and killed on September 10. The woman then requested the name 'Charlie Kirk' to be written on her order in honor of the late activist - but the barista declined. 'We can't do political names,' the employee says in the video, smiling. 'But it [the register] didn't even ask for a name to begin with so it's going to be $3.75.' The customer responds, 'Well, can't you write the name on the cup?' 'I could write "Charlie?" the barista offers, prompting the customer to ask why the full name can't be written. 'Because it's political,' the employee replies before turning around, seemingly beginning to fulfill the order. The woman then tells the barista to cancel the order: 'You know what, forget it. I don't want it.' In a caption to the video, she added: 'The barista walked over to my husband and handed him the drinks instead of using the name "Charlie." She is the one who brought up "politics." If she would have said "okay" then written the name, no politics would have been mentioned.' The video drew over 4,000 comments and has ignited a wave of critical Yelp reviews targeting the Starbucks location in Yucaipa, California. 'Manager should focus on either hiring new employees who can meet professional service standards or ensuring current staff receive additional sensitivity training. At present, staff interactions are coming across as rude and unprofessional, which reflects poorly on the quality of service,' one review reads. 'I am a Starbucks owner in GA & I would suggest to never shop here again! Say Charlie Kirks name! I have been in contact with Corp,' wrote another. After the incident went viral, the popular coffeehouse and roastery chain issued a statement clarifying its position. 'There are no restrictions on customers using Charlie Kirk's name on their order, and we are following up with our team,' the company said Tuesday. Starbucks followed up the next day with a more detailed statement, distancing itself from the employee's actions and addressing the broader policy. 'Starbucks is a company built on human connection. Having a name, rather than a number, attached to a customer order has been a core part of the Starbucks coffeehouse experience for decades,' the company said. 'Most customers use their own name. And when a customer wants to use a different name - including the name Charlie Kirk - when ordering their drink in our café, we aim to respect their preference.' Starbucks acknowledged that it has previously issued internal guidance in response to customers attempting to use political slogans, profanities, or offensive language as their 'name' - often with the intent of getting a barista to say or write it aloud. 'Over the years, we have had instances where some people have tried to abuse the system,' the statement said. 'For example, they've provided something that isn't a name at all, but rather a political slogan with the aim of having our barista shout it out as they hand off the finished drink… We aim to be a community coffeehouse where everyone feels welcome, so we have previously provided guidance to our partners to respectfully ask the customer to use a different name when attempting to use political slogans or phrases in place of their name.' 'We are clarifying with our team now that names, on their own, can be used by customers on their café order, as they wish.' Despite the clarification, many Starbucks employees say the guidance has not always been clear. Eight baristas interviewed by Business Insider said they were uncertain whether writing political names on cups was allowed prior to the new statement. Six believed such requests were prohibited, while two thought they were permitted under existing policy. According to Business Insider, the baristas - who spoke on condition of anonymity - described feeling caught between vague corporate directives, customer demands, and fears of being filmed and turned into viral content. 'It puts baristas in a very uncomfortable position,' said one employee with more than six years at the company. 'Given that we are at a workplace and would effectively be getting caught up in a customer's opinion that we may or may not agree with and cannot walk away from.' Some also referenced a corporate initiative under CEO Brian Niccol, introduced in 2024, that requires 'meaningful' handwritten notes to be included on to-go cups. 'When things like this gain traction, they basically become a meme,' one West Coast barista told Business Insider. 'And I won't be the punchline.' While Starbucks reiterated that customers are allowed to use any name - including political figures - when placing an order, the company continues to prohibit baristas from writing political messages or slogans on drinks.

Owen Gregorian

94,763 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Exposing Demus Pixx Darm. Is this really the competitive scene you want, Fortnite Competitive ? Normally, I wouldn’t care, just like I haven’t for the past few years, but we’re tired. Tired of it always happening to us. Tired of how impossible it is to compete on equal terms. It feels like it’s no longer about who’s better. It’s about who has more connections, who does more teaming, and who threatens others harder. We want to expose three situations that are clearly prohibited in the official FNCS rules, and that completely break the values of fair competition. ----------------------- 1. Repeated griefing and intentional suicides to prevent us from qualifying The team doing this was already qualified. And because we were their biggest threat in their POI, they spent the entire final part of Day 2 looking for us, pushing us, and leaving matches on purpose just to requeue and keep griefing. In the clips, you can clearly see how they eliminate us and immediately suicide just to requeue and find us again. In one game, when we weren’t even in the lobby, they just stood still looking for our names and stream sniped to keep griefing. They’re not trying to win or qualify. They just want to prevent us from doing it. 🟥 This clearly breaks: · Section 8.1.3 – Game Sabotage “Players shall not engage in game sabotage… or any activity harmful to the enjoyment of Fortnite by other users as intended by Epic.” · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Any form of unfair play is prohibited by these Rules.” “Intentionally Disconnecting from Fortnite after you or a member of your team takes damage…” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Feeding: Intentionally allowing oneself to be eliminated by an opposing player.” While this isn't traditional “feeding,” they are intentionally dying after targeting us, only to requeue and do it again. That’s sabotage, and it clearly violates the spirit and intent of these rules. ----------------------- 2. Systematic teaming with friends from their country 🇵🇱 There is no competitive integrity when 100% of the games are played the same way, by the same two teams trading surge, never finishing kills, and never actually fighting. This isn’t a real contest. It’s always the same surge base, the same damage pattern, and zero intent to eliminate. In one clip below, they even knock each other and have a launch pad right below them, but don’t use it. Because they’re friends. Let’s be clear: Kombek is in our heat, and he’s openly friends with Pixx Demus. If they’re teaming in customs, how can we trust that when we fight their friends during Heat 1, Kombek won’t rotate to back them up? It’s happened before. And it keeps happening. 🟥 This clearly violates: · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Teaming: Players working together during the Match while on opposing teams.” “Planned Movement: Agreement between two or more opposing players to land at specific locations and move through the map in a planned way before the Match begins.” “Communication: Sending or receiving signals (both verbal and non-verbal) to communicate with opposing players.” This isn’t strategy. It’s blatant system abuse, and everyone sees it. ----------------------- 3. Coaching and pre-planned griefing across heats They’re coaching teams (friends) in other heats to grief the players contesting their spot, so that if those friends qualify, they’ll get a completely free drop in Grands. They’re manipulating the tournament before it even begins, and the worst part is that they post about it publicly, proudly. And maybe this would make some sense if later that teams planned to contest Demus, Pixx or Darm in Grands, but they don’t. They’ve already agreed beforehand not to land on them. They’re just helping eliminate threats now so they can keep the drop uncontested later. This is about: - Coaching others to do their dirty work - Cross-heat griefing coordination - Securing free drops before even qualifying 🟥 This breaks: · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Each player is expected to play within the spirit of Fortnite and these Rules at all times during any Event Match.” “Utilizing outside assistance regarding the location of other players… or any other information not otherwise known to the player by the information on his or her own screen.” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Any agreement to intentionally influence the outcome of any match or Event.” This isn’t a one-off case. It’s deliberate, long-term structural manipulation of drops, heats and the entire competitive system. ----------------------- Where’s the fairness when you load into a game? What chance do new or unknown players have if they don’t have the right connections? Do you really want a competitive scene where abusing the system, not skill, is what works best? And no, this isn’t “contest” These are 10 out of 10 games between the same two teams, building the same surge bases, trading damage, and making each other’s games infinitely easier. There’s no midgame. No map strategy. No real rotations. Just teaming and abuse. This is not the Fortnite we fell in love with Remove surge. Or at least: - Penalize repeated surge trades between the same teams - Prevent infinite surge exchanges between friends - Punish ultra-late rotations after fake trades Do something. Anything. Because this isn’t what competitive Fortnite was meant to be. We just want to compete. Show what Spain can do. Play fair. Real 3v3s. No alliances, no coaching favors, no manipulation. We appreciate any support on this post. We’re doing it for our region. We deserve the same right to compete as anyone else. We can’t stay silent when: - We’re being teamed on - We’re griefed in 5 straight games - Others are being coached to cone us We’ve already reported everything. And we encourage anyone who’s gone through something similar to report it too. We have clips, proof, screenshots, and we’re ready to provide whatever is needed for a serious investigation. All we’re asking for is a fair chance to compete. There needs to be a line. A precedent. If you care even a little about this game, it’s time to act. And let’s not pretend this is new. Every season it's the same. Hogman Loomin Leven Tocata Evanosaurus “Unrawrl Engine 5.8” Rex Fortnite_ES

khaorz

82,653 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce