Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON HEARING BOMBSHELL: Judge Rules on Transparency – But Massive Conflict of Interest Still Unresolved 🚨 Today's (Dec 29, 2025) hearing in the Tyler Robinson case just dropped major rulings – here's what it means for justice, free speech, and transparency: The Good (Sort Of): 🔘Judge ordered...

115,000 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨EXPOSED: Terryl Farnsworth's Cousin Is LAWYER On Tyler Robinson Defense Team– Defense SKIPPING Evidence That Would EXPOSE FOREIGN INTEL ASSASSINS!🤯 Tyler Robinson is being set up as the "lone wolf" patsy, and the defense team's massive conflict of interest is screaming cover-up! Michael Burt—a key attorney on Tyler's defense—is Terryl Farnsworth's cousin. Terryl? The TPUSA AV guy caught tampering with evidence: yanking SD cards minutes after the hit and standing on Charlie's chair to contaminate the scene. This is a blatant conflict—how can Tyler get a fair trial when his lawyer is family-tied to a prime suspect with direct stage access? Worse: The defense's discovery requests are suspiciously narrow—enough to railroad Tyler but conveniently missing critical items that would expose foreign intelligence involvement: 🔘No demand for TPUSA's 4K stage cameras (8 feet away—perfect view). 🔘No probe into the private surveillance plane contracted 45 minutes before the hit. 🔘No request for military/civilian drone footage or operators. 🔘No investigation into visitors/cell data from Tyler's apartment night before. 🔘Nothing on Egyptian-linked planes/contractors at the airport running counter-UAS drills. 🔘Have NOT contacted key witnesses or journalist who've exposed major red flags in the prosecution's case. This limited scope protects any nation-state actor while pinning it all on Tyler. Prosecutors aren't even charging attempted murder—going all-in on "lone wolf" murder means if defense proves another killer (mic blast, second shooter), Tyler walks FREE. But with Burt on the team? They're not pushing for that truth. Demand Michael Burt RECUSE himself IMMEDIATELY—major conflict of interest. Demand defense fight for full discovery exposing intel services. Tyler deserves real justice—not a scripted conviction to bury the real killers. The fix is in unless WE make noise. Justice for Charlie starts here. 🔥🇺🇸 Be sure to FOLLOW HolonCitizen Who is a great investigator and has been helping me big time with this investigation. Tag lawyers, journalists, patriots—make this go viral before trial locks in the lie. PLEASE Tag Candace Owens And ask her to help get the word out to save Tyler from being railroaded and ensure he has a fair trial.

Project Constitution

274,480 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's LAWYER Michael Burt Connected to SD Card Thief Terryl Farnsworth & Egyptian Planes – Jimmy Dore Goes Nuclear☢️ Jimmy Dore covers my reporting on the Tyler Robinson "defense" team – and it's beyond suspicious. Key Revelations: 💠Terrell Farnsworth (the TPUSA AV guy who yanked the SD cards from cameras behind Charlie and got caught lying about why) – his cousin Michael Burt is a high-profile attorney on Tyler Robinson's defense team. 💠Michael Burt's father-in-law was former EVP/COO of Duncan Aviation – the exact company linked to the suspicious Egyptian-registered planes flagged around the assassination. Conflict of interest? This screams sabotage. How can Tyler get a fair trial when his own lawyer is family-tied to people who controlled cameras/audio and contaminated the crime scene? Then it gets even darker: Massive Google search spike for Tyler's court-appointed attorney Katherine Nester... all from Israel IPs in Dec 2024, right as the case heated up. Jimmy: "They're railroading Tyler as the patsy while the real players skate." Mormon mafia networks, TPUSA insiders, Israeli connections, contaminated evidence, paved-over crime scene... This isn't coincidence. This is a fix. The same people screaming "stop asking questions" are the ones who told us the vaccine was "safe & effective" and ivermectin was "horse paste." Never. Stop. Asking. Justice for Charlie means exposing the network – not burying it. Jimmy Dore is cooking. Watch the full clip. Candace Owens was right from day one. The truth is coming – and they can't stop it. Should Michael Burt be forced to recuse himself? Let me know your thoughts. It's clear the "FIX" is in. 🦝 RT and Tag Candace Owens Be sure to FOLLOW Jimmy Dore and check out his latest EPISODE. Link will be posted in the comments below.

Project Constitution

406,380 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨UPDATE: Massive Conflict Still Being IGNORED By The Court For MONTHS - 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 Join's GROWING Chorus Of Influencer's DEMANDING Michael Burt's RECUSAL From Tyler Robinson's Defense Team😱🚩 Tyler Robinson's Defense Attorney Michael Burt is COUSIN to Terryl Farnsworth – the A/V guy who stood on Charlie's chair, REMOVED cameras and SD cards from the crime scene BEFORE police arrived, CONTAMINATING evidence & tampering with it! Farnsworth then LIED about why he did it (first blamed cops, then said fear of theft – but WHY not take the whole camera?). Minutes after the shooting, he filmed a SELFIE prematurely announcing Charlie Kirk had DIED from injuries. WTF? I broke this LAST MONTH – and STILL, neither Burt nor the court has addressed this MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST! 🚩 Burt MUST recuse himself IMMEDIATELY, or we PETITION the court to REMOVE him & file BAR COMPLAINTS for hiding it. With Burt on the team, Tyler Robinson has ZERO chance of a fair trial – he's being RAILROADED as a patsy in this sketchy setup! Ties to TPUSA insiders? Mormon Mafia connections? This TOTALLY stinks! Jesse on Fire just joined the chorus of other online influencers demanding Burt's removal. Watch Jesse's reaction to my video below: "If this is true... I straight up don't believe the official story." Shoutout 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 for covering this – and congrats on Jimmy Dore show! FOLLOW Jesse and go watch his FULL video. Trust me you want to see his other segment. I'll drop the link down in the comments below.

Project Constitution

29,130 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨MORMON MAFIA BOMBSHELL: TERRYL FARNSWORTH Cousin Is LAWYER On Tyler Robinson Defense While FATHER IN-LAW Was Former VP Of DUNCAN AVIATION😱 Myself and MIA just uncovered two MASSIVE bombshells in the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation: Terryl Farnsworth's cousin is a key attorney on "shooter" Tyler Robinson's defense team, and his father-in-law was former EVP/COO of Duncan Aviation—the exact company tied to the suspicious Egyptian planes tracked on the day of Charlie's murder. First, the defense conflict: Michael Burt (high-profile SF attorney) is directly related to Terryl Farnsworth (the TPUSA AV guy who yanked SD cards post-hit and contaminated the scene). Michael is on Tyler Robinson's legal team—despite family loyalty to the very insiders with access to Charlie's stage setup. This is a blatant conflict of interest. How can Tyler get a fair trial when his own lawyer is tied to suspects who controlled audio, cameras, and evidence? It's screaming setup—Tyler's being railroaded as the patsy while real players skate. Next, the aviation link: Terryl's father-in-law Duane Burt held top executive roles at Duncan Aviation (Utah facility)—where those Egyptian-registered planes (flagged in Charlie's threats and pre-attack searches) were located the day of the execution. Duane's expertise and connections in elite aviation circles put this family smack in the middle of the "Egyptian planes" mystery. Coincidence? Or direct access to the tools needed for a sophisticated hit? The bigger picture: The Farnsworth-Burt clan is embedded in Utah's powerful "Mormon Mafia"—intermarried elite families (often sharing polygamous pioneer roots) who dominate politics, business, and institutions in Mormon-heavy states. Known for insider networks, loyalty to establishment figures like the Romneys, and quiet control over key sectors—these aren't random players; they're connected old-guard protecting their own. This web—TPUSA insiders, defense sabotage, aviation anomalies, Mormon power ties—proves the fix is in. No way it's all coincidence. Demand Michael Burt recuse himself immediately so Tyler gets a real defense. And force the FBI to investigate these Farnsworth-Burt connections NOW—before the truth gets buried forever. Justice for Charlie starts with exposing the network. Share this far and wide. 🔥🇺🇸 Be sure to follow MIA who is doing God's work. Tag Candace Owens and RT this out so more people know.

Project Constitution

773,355 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 MAJOR RULING: Continuance APPROVED, Blanket Camera Ban DENIED – Tyler Robinson Gets Extra Time, But Cameras Stay Allowed in Courtroom! 👀 The world is watching as the capital murder case against Tyler Robinson—the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk—takes a massive, high-stakes turn in court today (May 8, 2026). Fourth District Judge Tony Graf just handed down orders that change the game for how we witness this trial. Here is everything you need to know from today’s hearing: 1. NO BLANKET CAMERA BAN (For Now!) In a massive win for transparency and the public’s right to see justice, Judge Graf REFUSED to issue an outright ban on cameras and livestreams. This means the courtroom remains open to the world... but there’s a catch. 2. THE DEFENSE’S NEW WEAPON While there is no total blackout, the Judge left the door WIDE OPEN for the defense. Robinson’s attorneys are now allowed to fight for camera bans on a hearing-by-hearing basis. They have already moved to ban cameras specifically for the upcoming preliminary hearing. Media organizations are already gearing up for a legal war to oppose them. 3. PRELIMINARY HEARING DELAYED The crucial preliminary hearing (originally set for mid-May) has been pushed back to July 6–10. The defense argued they need more time to comb through the "massive amounts of evidence" in this death-penalty case. Cameras will be allowed for this July date UNLESS the defense’s new motion succeeds. 4. WHAT’S AT STAKE? ⚖️ This is a battle between Open Courts vs. Fair Trial Rights. The defense is desperate to shield Robinson from viral clips and real-time commentary that could taint the jury pool in this hyper-political case. Meanwhile, the public is demanding the right to see justice served in the light of day. THE VERDICT IS YOURS: Should cameras be allowed in the courtroom for a trial this massive, or does the media circus ruin the chance for a fair trial? 🏛️💬 Watch the FULL Hearing Down Below. 👇 DROP YOUR TAKE BELOW AND SHARE THIS POST if you believe justice must be transparent!

Project Constitution

113,582 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼️EXPOSED: Andrea Burkhart Says Michael Burt Being The COUSIN Of Terrl Farnsworth Is NOT A Conflict Of Interest—Here Is Why She's WRONG! ❌ 👀 Legal "experts" are actively trying to deceive you about the massive conflict of interest in the Tyler Robinson trial. Let’s talk about Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ and the blatant legal sleight of hand she just used to protect defense attorney Michael Burt. Burkhart confidently claims that because Burt is "only a cousin" to Terryl Farnsworth, there is no conflict of interest under Utah law. She is completely misinterpreting the rules to fit a narrative. Here are the facts she left out: The "Close Relative" Strawman: Burkhart points to a narrow clause defining "close relatives" (like spouses or siblings) to dismiss the family tie. But she completely ignores the REAL rule: Utah Rule 1.7(a)(2), which strictly forbids representation if it is "materially limited" by a lawyer's "personal interest." The Ultimate Conflict: Terryl Farnsworth isn't just a distant relative—he is a key witness who was at the scene when Charlie Kirk was murdered. He is the man who allegedly tampered with the crime scene, stood on Charlie's chair, removed the SD card and camera facing the shooter, and trampled the area before police forensics arrived. The Cross-Examination Problem: Michael Burt's job is to ruthlessly defend Tyler Robinson. That means pointing the finger at alternate suspects and destroying the credibility of the state's witnesses. How is Burt supposed to aggressively cross-examine his own cousin about destroying evidence without pulling his punches? He can't. The "Secret Waiver" Lie: Burkhart argues this conflict can just be waived "behind the scenes." In a capital murder trial? Absolutely not. If Robinson is convicted, the very first appeal will be "Ineffective Assistance of Counsel" because his lawyer was protecting a family member. A conflict this staggering has to be addressed on the record in open court. Why are internet commentators running cover for a defense attorney who has to cross-examine his own cousin over a contaminated crime scene? What are they terrified we might find out? ⚖️🧐 CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman - I'd love for you guys to weigh in on this discussion. This is a super important detail that NEEDS to brought up to a larger audience. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪

Project Constitution

18,978 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

264,589 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨FOLLOW-UP BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's Defense STILL Skipping KEY Evidence – Is the Fix In Deeper Than We Thought? 😱 Remember my last post exposing the MASSIVE conflict in Tyler's trial? Michael Burt – lead defense attorney – is COUSIN to Terryl Farnsworth, the TPUSA AV insider caught tampering with SD cards and contaminating Charlie Kirk's stage right after the hit. That's a GLARING conflict of interest that screams setup. How can Tyler get a fair shot when his lawyer's family is tied to suspects with direct access? Now, BIG breakthrough from HolonCitizen's latest video: The defense's discovery list is STILL ignoring CRITICAL federal-level evidence that could BLOW THIS CASE WIDE OPEN and potentially ACQUIT Tyler! From the original discovery (as I covered) to this updated analysis – they're requesting "pedestrian" local stuff like basic witness statements... but NOTHING that pulls from the FBI's powerhouse tools. Here's what's MISSING (and why it matters): NO 302 Reports: These are FBI's detailed interview summaries – the goldmine of federal intel. Other high-profile cases pull them ALL THE TIME to uncover hidden details. Why skip? These could reveal witness accounts blocked by FBI directives (police radio record show FBI ordered local LE NOT to interview witnesses on Day 1 – only a handful followed up out of 3,000 people there). NO Cell Tower Data/Pings: FBI has "magic" powers here – tracking EVERYONE'S movements (even without calls/texts) down to 10 feet, for months. Could map out accomplices, rental cars from airports, visits to Tyler's apartment night before, key spots around UVU. In similar cases, defense uses this to PROVE multiple actors. Here? Crickets. Stuck at Local Level: Analogy to 1960s Dallas case (JFK vibes) – keeping it local avoids elevating to federal conspiracy if multiple people involved. If defense pulled federal data, it could force the case up, exposing "men in white suits" (higher-level players) and making invisible evidence visible. If the defense was TRULY fighting to ACQUIT Tyler – charged with murder, NOT attempted – they'd hammer this stuff to show OTHERS caused the death (e.g., second shooter, mic blast, blanks from Tyler). Prosecution's "lone wolf" narrative crumbles, Tyler walks FREE. But with Burt's family ties to Farnsworth (and Farnsworth's father-in-law Tom Burt's Duncan Aviation links to those Egyptian planes and rental cars)? They're NOT doing it. This isn't incompetence – it's a pattern that keeps the real story buried. Demand Michael Burt RECUSE for this blatant conflict. Demand FULL federal discovery – 302s, cell data, ALL of it. Tyler's no saint, but he deserves a REAL defense, not a railroad job. Charlie's truth demands we keep digging. Share if you're outraged – tag Candace Owens, lawyers, patriots. Let's make 2026 the year the cover-up cracks! 🇺🇸💥 Be sure to FOLLOW my bro HolonCitizen and go watch series of videos exposing these GLARING deficiencies.

Project Constitution

304,452 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

Curtis Houck

274,846 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen