Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Typical Paijaan mindset.... 11 air bases struck? Not bothered.... 9 terror camps destroyed? Not bothered.... Hundreds of soldiers and terrorists eliminated? Not bothered.... But the mere claim of shooting down a few million dollars' worth of fighter jet is treated as if they won the war. It's like losing...

12,762 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BEGGARS CANNOT BE CHOOSERS. The world did not see the PAF flying during the entire four day war except the intial minutes when India struck terror sites on Day 1. PAF AWACS and JF-17s got shot down first by the S-400 when they got airborne, and when they got grounded they got slammed by Indian airstrikes on 11 airbases. Pakistani Aand Forces first failed in protecting the terror sites on the first day and failed on next day in protecting the radars and ADs in whole Pakistan from Indian Drone strikes and failed again on next day to save hangars and runways of 11 PAF airbases. All they have is the Lahori Churan of "We shot down Rafales and destroyed S-400" with blurry satellite images as proofs. Now coming to Pakistan being a negotiator in the Iran War. It is just a joke. Pakistan is just a postman exchanging messages, nothing more. Did Iran has said till now that it accepts Pakistani mediation or even this postman role? No. Did Vance came to Pakistan to negotiate with Iran either? No. All Pakistan did was sell Lahori Churan to its own people and hold a meeting with the FMs of Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, all of whom are just client states of the US. Two need loans from the US and two need security from the US. Pakistan is doing all of this drama for three reasons. First, Pakistan needs IMF and World Bank loans to survive the coming economic shock, so it cannot anger its masters in Washington. Second, if the Iran war escalates, Saudi Arabia can ask Pakistan to protect them under that so called defence pact, which could create a civil war in Pakistan because of the Shia-Sunni divide. Moreover, if Pakistan denies Saudi Arabia's request, Riyadh can pull out the $5 billion dollars it placed in Pakistani banks to save Pakistan from defaulting. Third, if the US starts a ground invasion or operations in Iran it will need bases in Pakistan for intel gathering, and in that scenario Iran will start striking Pakistan as well. So the only way out Pakistan sees from this situation is a terror attack on India to trigger a war, so Pakistan can decouple itself from the whole situation. Because the Aand Forces know they are just a postman, no deescalation or peace is happening, and in an escalatory situation Pakistan will be caught between a rock and a hard place. If Pakistanis still do not believe this, at least listen to your own Form 47 government's PM ShowBaz Sharif, who admits that No one in the world takes Pakistan seriously and uses it as a Useful idiot or Mercenary State.

The Unknown

86,047 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: Congress leader Manish Tewari on prominent citizens from India and Pakistan appealing PMs of both countries for 'restoring peace, normalcy, dialogue', says, "Well, that's not an appeal for a dialogue. It is an instrument of an unconditional surrender. We want peace with Pakistan, but it has to be peace without terror. It has to be peace with honour. Has Pakistan given any commitment that it will dismantle the entire military jihadi complex. That they have very assiduously nurtured since the late 1970s. Has Pakistan said that they would ensure that the soil of their country is not used for perpetrating terror against India. A commitment which was given by President Musharraf in 2002 in a televised address to the people of Pakistan, as well as reiterated when Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visited Islamabad in December 2004 for the SAARC Summit. And then repeated ad nauseam in the conversations that took place with between Dr. Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani interlocutors, or even Prime Minister Modi later with his Pakistani interlocutors. So, therefore, the question is not peace. The question is, peace at what cost? Peace cannot come with a gun to your head, you know, with somebody holding the gun of terror to your head. And all these people who've written this letter are very eminent people in their professional and private capacities. They have dealt with the Pakistanis over the entire span of their professional careers. They exactly know as to how perfidious these people are as to how they say one thing and mean the other thing altogether. And therefore, if there has to be peace, or if there has to be a dialogue, terror and talks cannot go hand in hand. You need to ensure that Pakistan dismantles the entire infrastructure of terror that Pakistan have created. Who does not want peace? Everybody wants peace, but it has to be peace without terror and peace with honor." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

59,074 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat