Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Ubuntu Tribe did not start as a crypto idea. It started from a clearer question: why do asset-rich regions stay cash-poor while value keeps leaving their hands? Tokenized gold opens a different path. Smaller entry points, wider access, and a way for more people to hold what has preserved... show more

Ubuntu Tribe

12,057 subscribers

11,005 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

While many investors are buying Dangote shares, one investor chose a different path he used his money to buy millions of naira worth of physical gold instead. His reason? “Buy the dip.” Not in stocks. Not in crypto. In gold. He sees gold as a long-term investment and a store of value for his children. My question: Is this a wise investment strategy, or would you rather put that money into stocks, Sukuk, real estate, or a business? And is gold part of your investment portfolio? 👇 What would you do, and why?

While many investors are buying Dangote shares, one investor chose a different path he used his money to buy millions of naira worth of physical gold instead. His reason? “Buy the dip.” Not in stocks. Not in crypto. In gold. He sees gold as a long-term investment and a store of value for his children. My question: Is this a wise investment strategy, or would you rather put that money into stocks, Sukuk, real estate, or a business? And is gold part of your investment portfolio? 👇 What would you do, and why?

Hadiza Bello

122,928 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman: The Repricing of ETH as Money Could Start Pretty Soon "ETH is like BTC++ in that it's productive, it has yield -- which financial people love -- but also it's a store of value and used as collateral. It's basically used as money across the Ethereum economy." "It is an asymmetric bet that Ethereum will reprice from being valued like a technology company to becoming money. There is a potential 100x as that starts to happen." "It'd be wishful thinking to suggest an immediate 100x, but the repricing could start pretty soon. People now know what Bitcoin is. People obviously know what gold is. There is a need for a digital asset store of value or multiple of them. ETH is emerging more and more as that second pristine store of value asset, and we think it will become the primary one." "BlackRock just launched their staking ETF, so they're calling ETH a productive asset that's earning yield. Harvard just rotated some of their Bitcoin holdings into ETH. You're seeing the institutional allocations diversify, so it's starting now, and [Productive Money] is the thesis for it to really catch hold." Read the full report and watch the full @MilkRoad interview with Vivek Raman in the links below.

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman: The Repricing of ETH as Money Could Start Pretty Soon "ETH is like BTC++ in that it's productive, it has yield -- which financial people love -- but also it's a store of value and used as collateral. It's basically used as money across the Ethereum economy." "It is an asymmetric bet that Ethereum will reprice from being valued like a technology company to becoming money. There is a potential 100x as that starts to happen." "It'd be wishful thinking to suggest an immediate 100x, but the repricing could start pretty soon. People now know what Bitcoin is. People obviously know what gold is. There is a need for a digital asset store of value or multiple of them. ETH is emerging more and more as that second pristine store of value asset, and we think it will become the primary one." "BlackRock just launched their staking ETF, so they're calling ETH a productive asset that's earning yield. Harvard just rotated some of their Bitcoin holdings into ETH. You're seeing the institutional allocations diversify, so it's starting now, and [Productive Money] is the thesis for it to really catch hold." Read the full report and watch the full @MilkRoad interview with Vivek Raman in the links below.

Etherealize

155,701 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🔥BILLIONAIRE INVESTOR GRANTHAM: "CRYPTO IS USELESS. WHAT THE HELL DOES IT DO?" Jeremy Grantham, one of Wall Street’s most famous bubble watchers, says crypto is a “useless speculative” asset that will end “not with a bang, but a whimper.” He argues it is not a stable store of value and is barely used for real-world payments. “What it does is allows crooks to move money around without leaving a trace.”

🔥BILLIONAIRE INVESTOR GRANTHAM: "CRYPTO IS USELESS. WHAT THE HELL DOES IT DO?" Jeremy Grantham, one of Wall Street’s most famous bubble watchers, says crypto is a “useless speculative” asset that will end “not with a bang, but a whimper.” He argues it is not a stable store of value and is barely used for real-world payments. “What it does is allows crooks to move money around without leaving a trace.”

Coin Bureau

86,831 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Managing multi-asset exposure in one wallet - crypto, gold & tokenized stocks 📲 ITLX wallet isn’t just a crypto wallet. It’s a multi-asset trading hub designed for active capital management. With ITLX wallet, you can: • Trade CRYPTO, GOLD, and TOKENIZED U.S STOCK in one place • Manage exposure without switching apps or platforms • Keep capital efficient and always deployable across markets Most wallets stop at crypto. ITLX goes further by integrating tokenized real-world assets, allowing you to rebalance between volatile assets, hard stores of value, and equity exposure - instantly. As markets rotate, speed and flexibility win. ITLX lets you move capital where opportunity is, without friction. Built for traders, not spectators. Wallet powered by InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 #ITLX #ITLG #ITL

Managing multi-asset exposure in one wallet - crypto, gold & tokenized stocks 📲 ITLX wallet isn’t just a crypto wallet. It’s a multi-asset trading hub designed for active capital management. With ITLX wallet, you can: • Trade CRYPTO, GOLD, and TOKENIZED U.S STOCK in one place • Manage exposure without switching apps or platforms • Keep capital efficient and always deployable across markets Most wallets stop at crypto. ITLX goes further by integrating tokenized real-world assets, allowing you to rebalance between volatile assets, hard stores of value, and equity exposure - instantly. As markets rotate, speed and flexibility win. ITLX lets you move capital where opportunity is, without friction. Built for traders, not spectators. Wallet powered by InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 #ITLX #ITLG #ITL

ITLX Wallet

25,618 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This scene always makes me think about what markets do once a simple asset story is no longer enough. At first people buy the thing itself. Then, at some point, that stops being exciting enough. So the market starts building layers around it. A structure. A wrapper. A more financial version of the same idea. That is why MSTR comes to mind for me here. Not because it is the same as a synthetic CDO. It obviously is not. But because the instinct feels familiar. If you believe in Bitcoin, the clean path is simple. You buy Bitcoin. If you want a more traditional route, you buy the ETF. That should be enough. But MSTR is something else entirely. It is Bitcoin, turned into a corporate vehicle, then turned into a capital markets machine, then turned into a narrative people are willing to value differently from the asset underneath it. And that is where it starts feeling less like pure exposure and more like financial engineering built around exposure. We have seen this movie before in different forms. Markets love taking a real asset, wrapping it in a new story, and then assigning the wrapper a value that starts drifting away from the thing it actually holds. As long as that premium stays alive, the machine keeps working. More demand for the structure. More capital raised. More accumulation. Bigger story. More believers. On the way up, it all looks brilliant. That is always the seductive part. In strong markets, even very simple reflexive loops can look like genius. The real question only shows up later, when the mood changes and people start asking whether the value was in the underlying asset all along, or in the extra meaning the market temporarily assigned to the structure built around it. That is why I find this clip so relevant. It is not just a reminder of 2008. It is a reminder of a deeper market habit. People rarely stop at owning the thing. They almost always find a way to build another layer on top of it. And to me, that is the more interesting question around MSTR. Not how much more Bitcoin it can buy. But how long the market will keep rewarding the wrapper more than the thing inside it.

This scene always makes me think about what markets do once a simple asset story is no longer enough. At first people buy the thing itself. Then, at some point, that stops being exciting enough. So the market starts building layers around it. A structure. A wrapper. A more financial version of the same idea. That is why MSTR comes to mind for me here. Not because it is the same as a synthetic CDO. It obviously is not. But because the instinct feels familiar. If you believe in Bitcoin, the clean path is simple. You buy Bitcoin. If you want a more traditional route, you buy the ETF. That should be enough. But MSTR is something else entirely. It is Bitcoin, turned into a corporate vehicle, then turned into a capital markets machine, then turned into a narrative people are willing to value differently from the asset underneath it. And that is where it starts feeling less like pure exposure and more like financial engineering built around exposure. We have seen this movie before in different forms. Markets love taking a real asset, wrapping it in a new story, and then assigning the wrapper a value that starts drifting away from the thing it actually holds. As long as that premium stays alive, the machine keeps working. More demand for the structure. More capital raised. More accumulation. Bigger story. More believers. On the way up, it all looks brilliant. That is always the seductive part. In strong markets, even very simple reflexive loops can look like genius. The real question only shows up later, when the mood changes and people start asking whether the value was in the underlying asset all along, or in the extra meaning the market temporarily assigned to the structure built around it. That is why I find this clip so relevant. It is not just a reminder of 2008. It is a reminder of a deeper market habit. People rarely stop at owning the thing. They almost always find a way to build another layer on top of it. And to me, that is the more interesting question around MSTR. Not how much more Bitcoin it can buy. But how long the market will keep rewarding the wrapper more than the thing inside it.

Mercek

14,644 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

An angry caller confronts Dave Ramsey for calling “Infinite Banking” a scam only to walk directly into a brutal financial reality check. Caller: “I am calling in response to a video I saw recently that you claimed infinite banking concept was a scam and actually got quite pissed off about it. I do not agree with that, and certain points that you made in that video. And I have set up a policy for my son when he was 1 years old, he's 5 now. Has a 500 thousand dollar face value. We pay 5,373 dollars a year for 13 years, and it's paid up at that point. There's a few points that I wanted to discuss that I just didn't agree with. One of the main things was that... so you claim that the cash value dies with you, and you only get the face value paid out.” Dave: “That's true. That is.” Caller: “Well, it's not true if you reinvest the dividends back into the policy.” Dave: “Dividend reinvestment is not cash value. Dividend reinvestment is because you have a mutual company, and the policyholders are the owners of the company. And so the profits from the company come to the policyholder, and they use that to buy paid up additions. That is not the same as keeping your cash value. That's buying extra insurance with your overpayment.” Caller: “But it still works out to be having a cash value much greater than the $69,849 we put into it.” Dave: “But the actual cash value, not the paid up additions... the actual cash value dies with you.” Caller: “No, because—” Dave: “Yes it does. I think... oh, OK.” Caller: “But your death benefit is larger than your cash value, so for me, I looked at it—” Dave: “Because you bought more insurance! You know what a paid up addition is? A paid up addition is buying additional insurance. I understand that's why you're getting more at death. Not because you got your cash value, but because you used your policy dividends to buy additional insurance. Right? But that's different than getting your cash value. If you took those policy dividends and went and bought a term insurance policy for 100,000, well, you'd get 100,000. But that's not your cash value.” Caller: “Well, I have a term policy.” Dave: “I know, but you missed my point. You're talking about... you use the policy dividends. You use the money they send to you because you're in a mutual company to buy additional insurance.” Caller: “Yes, paid up additions, yeah.” Dave: “Yeah, if you'd buy a term policy on the side for $100,000 instead, with that same money, you would get $100,000 more than your face value. But that's not your cash value, that's additional insurance. They're different.” Caller: “But right... they are different. In term, you don't have cash value to borrow again.” Dave: “I'm aware of that. But your point was that you don't lose the cash value, and my point is 100% of the time, by definition, you lose the cash value.”

An angry caller confronts Dave Ramsey for calling “Infinite Banking” a scam only to walk directly into a brutal financial reality check. Caller: “I am calling in response to a video I saw recently that you claimed infinite banking concept was a scam and actually got quite pissed off about it. I do not agree with that, and certain points that you made in that video. And I have set up a policy for my son when he was 1 years old, he's 5 now. Has a 500 thousand dollar face value. We pay 5,373 dollars a year for 13 years, and it's paid up at that point. There's a few points that I wanted to discuss that I just didn't agree with. One of the main things was that... so you claim that the cash value dies with you, and you only get the face value paid out.” Dave: “That's true. That is.” Caller: “Well, it's not true if you reinvest the dividends back into the policy.” Dave: “Dividend reinvestment is not cash value. Dividend reinvestment is because you have a mutual company, and the policyholders are the owners of the company. And so the profits from the company come to the policyholder, and they use that to buy paid up additions. That is not the same as keeping your cash value. That's buying extra insurance with your overpayment.” Caller: “But it still works out to be having a cash value much greater than the $69,849 we put into it.” Dave: “But the actual cash value, not the paid up additions... the actual cash value dies with you.” Caller: “No, because—” Dave: “Yes it does. I think... oh, OK.” Caller: “But your death benefit is larger than your cash value, so for me, I looked at it—” Dave: “Because you bought more insurance! You know what a paid up addition is? A paid up addition is buying additional insurance. I understand that's why you're getting more at death. Not because you got your cash value, but because you used your policy dividends to buy additional insurance. Right? But that's different than getting your cash value. If you took those policy dividends and went and bought a term insurance policy for 100,000, well, you'd get 100,000. But that's not your cash value.” Caller: “Well, I have a term policy.” Dave: “I know, but you missed my point. You're talking about... you use the policy dividends. You use the money they send to you because you're in a mutual company to buy additional insurance.” Caller: “Yes, paid up additions, yeah.” Dave: “Yeah, if you'd buy a term policy on the side for $100,000 instead, with that same money, you would get $100,000 more than your face value. But that's not your cash value, that's additional insurance. They're different.” Caller: “But right... they are different. In term, you don't have cash value to borrow again.” Dave: “I'm aware of that. But your point was that you don't lose the cash value, and my point is 100% of the time, by definition, you lose the cash value.”

Mide

65,566 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Warren Buffett was asked if Berkshire’s purchase of $AMZN (2019 at $89) was a departure from value investing. His answer cuts straight to the heart of what value investing actually means: “The idea that value is somehow connected to book value or low price to earnings ratios or anything, as Charlie has said all investing is value investing. You’re putting out money now to get more later — and making a calculation on the probability of getting it, and when.” ___ Buffett dismantles one of the most common misconceptions in investing. Value investing was never about low price-to-book ratios or cheap multiples. That’s a methodology — not a definition. The definition is simple: you’re paying a price today for a stream of future cash flows, and you’re asking whether you’re being adequately compensated. The label “value” vs. “growth” has always been a false dichotomy. All intelligent investing is value investing. ___ 🎙️ Berkshire 2019 Annual Meeting | CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (05/04/2019)

Warren Buffett was asked if Berkshire’s purchase of $AMZN (2019 at $89) was a departure from value investing. His answer cuts straight to the heart of what value investing actually means: “The idea that value is somehow connected to book value or low price to earnings ratios or anything, as Charlie has said all investing is value investing. You’re putting out money now to get more later — and making a calculation on the probability of getting it, and when.” _ Buffett dismantles one of the most common misconceptions in investing. Value investing was never about low price-to-book ratios or cheap multiples. That’s a methodology — not a definition. The definition is simple: you’re paying a price today for a stream of future cash flows, and you’re asking whether you’re being adequately compensated. The label “value” vs. “growth” has always been a false dichotomy. All intelligent investing is value investing. _ 🎙️ Berkshire 2019 Annual Meeting | CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (05/04/2019)

Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®

78,893 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Meet Jouelle, who’s using crypto to expand financial education and access, reflecting what our The Harris Poll survey found: 45% of crypto holders value the learning and personal growth opportunities it provides. "Crypto is more than currency. It's a way to help people take control of their financial future," says Jouelle, who teaches everyone from seniors to underbanked communities about digital wallets and financial tools. Her story is just one example of how crypto is creating positive change in communities across America. Visit to hear more of Jouelle’s story.

Meet Jouelle, who’s using crypto to expand financial education and access, reflecting what our The Harris Poll survey found: 45% of crypto holders value the learning and personal growth opportunities it provides. "Crypto is more than currency. It's a way to help people take control of their financial future," says Jouelle, who teaches everyone from seniors to underbanked communities about digital wallets and financial tools. Her story is just one example of how crypto is creating positive change in communities across America. Visit to hear more of Jouelle’s story.

National Cryptocurrency Association

98,224 просмотров • 1 год назад

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman on the case for ETH as money "When we look at ETH the asset, we should be comparing it to the TAM of money and not a software stock that's trading at a multiple of earnings. Ethereum is not a technology stock or a technology company -- it is the infrastructure platform where the world's assets are being digitized." "What is ETH? ETH is the money that's used across the entire Ethereum ecosystem and outside of the Ethereum ecosystem as a reserve asset." "BlackRock's second biggest digital asset ETF after Bitcoin is ETH. They just launched a staked ETH ETF -- that's for institutions to get exposure to this asset as a money and a store of value. You're seeing players like Tom Lee, Joe Lubin, and Joe Chalom hold ETH as an institutional treasury asset. They're not playing for a growth/earnings, company-style return. They're playing for a repricing of when ETH gets rated as a monetary asset." "What is the TAM of money? I would almost say it's conservative just saying it's gold and bitcoin. You also have the M2 of the US dollar. High end real estate is also viewed as a store of value." "But let's take the most tangible ones where ETH has superior properties -- gold and bitcoin -- and we think ETH should start to eat away at that monetary premium and capture some of that itself." Source: Roxom TV Read our full Productive Money report below 👇

Etherealize CEO Vivek Raman on the case for ETH as money "When we look at ETH the asset, we should be comparing it to the TAM of money and not a software stock that's trading at a multiple of earnings. Ethereum is not a technology stock or a technology company -- it is the infrastructure platform where the world's assets are being digitized." "What is ETH? ETH is the money that's used across the entire Ethereum ecosystem and outside of the Ethereum ecosystem as a reserve asset." "BlackRock's second biggest digital asset ETF after Bitcoin is ETH. They just launched a staked ETH ETF -- that's for institutions to get exposure to this asset as a money and a store of value. You're seeing players like Tom Lee, Joe Lubin, and Joe Chalom hold ETH as an institutional treasury asset. They're not playing for a growth/earnings, company-style return. They're playing for a repricing of when ETH gets rated as a monetary asset." "What is the TAM of money? I would almost say it's conservative just saying it's gold and bitcoin. You also have the M2 of the US dollar. High end real estate is also viewed as a store of value." "But let's take the most tangible ones where ETH has superior properties -- gold and bitcoin -- and we think ETH should start to eat away at that monetary premium and capture some of that itself." Source: Roxom TV Read our full Productive Money report below 👇

Etherealize

90,866 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Rasmr explains why having cash flow makes him cooler than a rich trencher with no income "There's a bunch of people with 3 mil PnL, but they don't have cash flow. I have money I make every month, I run this show, I have employees, I pay clippers. In my opinion what I do is cooler than just trenching, even if you have 8 or 10 mil, because I actually provide value and have a public persona." "I value clout, and I'm friends with really high level people. Just in Miami I linked with orangey, bread scales, Dylan Latham. That has real value, because if I'm doing business eventually, that network is going to pay off." "When you're a trader and you don't have cash flow, that's how you start taking bigger and bigger risks. You start rugging people, you start dumping on your followers, because you think you're rich and you elevate your lifestyle to 50k a month, and then you need a trade to profit just to keep spending. They don't have the cash flow to support the lifestyle."

Rasmr explains why having cash flow makes him cooler than a rich trencher with no income "There's a bunch of people with 3 mil PnL, but they don't have cash flow. I have money I make every month, I run this show, I have employees, I pay clippers. In my opinion what I do is cooler than just trenching, even if you have 8 or 10 mil, because I actually provide value and have a public persona." "I value clout, and I'm friends with really high level people. Just in Miami I linked with orangey, bread scales, Dylan Latham. That has real value, because if I'm doing business eventually, that network is going to pay off." "When you're a trader and you don't have cash flow, that's how you start taking bigger and bigger risks. You start rugging people, you start dumping on your followers, because you think you're rich and you elevate your lifestyle to 50k a month, and then you need a trade to profit just to keep spending. They don't have the cash flow to support the lifestyle."

Kai

41,317 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The crypto market is crashing. Bitcoin down 40%. Altcoins bleeding. Everyone’s panicking. But there’s a hidden business benefiting from this... It’s called a digital payment business. AKA, helping businesses accept crypto payments. & this crash is presenting an opportunity. Here’s why: When prices drop, people offload crypto, not just hold it. Option #1: Sell for cash (just sits there) Option #2: Trade for another asset or purchase That creates an opportunity for businesses that accept crypto payments. While everyone’s watching their portfolio bleed, I’m targeting businesses that need crypto payment solutions. Gold exchanges are one of those perfect targets. They’re already dealing with high-value transactions. They rarely accept credit cards because they can’t risk chargebacks. Plus, gold prices have skyrocketed recently. Here’s how I’ll take advantage: • Find a local gold exchange not accepting crypto • Place my device at the business and charge a % • Each time a customer pays I earn a percentage This is the boring business nobody talks about. It’s the one that cash flows regardless of whether Bitcoin is at $100k or $30k. Want a more in-depth breakdown of exactly how this works? DM me “Digital” and we'll chat.

The crypto market is crashing. Bitcoin down 40%. Altcoins bleeding. Everyone’s panicking. But there’s a hidden business benefiting from this... It’s called a digital payment business. AKA, helping businesses accept crypto payments. & this crash is presenting an opportunity. Here’s why: When prices drop, people offload crypto, not just hold it. Option #1: Sell for cash (just sits there) Option #2: Trade for another asset or purchase That creates an opportunity for businesses that accept crypto payments. While everyone’s watching their portfolio bleed, I’m targeting businesses that need crypto payment solutions. Gold exchanges are one of those perfect targets. They’re already dealing with high-value transactions. They rarely accept credit cards because they can’t risk chargebacks. Plus, gold prices have skyrocketed recently. Here’s how I’ll take advantage: • Find a local gold exchange not accepting crypto • Place my device at the business and charge a % • Each time a customer pays I earn a percentage This is the boring business nobody talks about. It’s the one that cash flows regardless of whether Bitcoin is at $100k or $30k. Want a more in-depth breakdown of exactly how this works? DM me “Digital” and we'll chat.

Gedam Tekle

16,091 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman 🇦🇪

Tokenization as Infrastructure, Not a Shortcut In this clip, André Casterman explains why tokenization is best understood as an upgrade to the internet’s financial infrastructure, not a guarantee of liquidity or success. Tokenization does not create demand on its own. Liquidity still matters. What it does change is the efficiency of how value moves. Cheaper settlement. Faster transfer. Native verifiability. Stablecoins are a clear example. Instead of routing payments through correspondent banking and local clearing entities, value can move directly by transferring tokens. The asset does not need to be physically moved or reconciled across jurisdictions. The result is lower cost and less friction. Verifiability is the real unlock. Unlike physical assets, which require costly and invasive processes to prove authenticity, tokenized assets can be verified on-chain, publicly, and without altering the asset itself. This is the shift from moving information to moving value. Tokenization is not a product. It is infrastructure. And infrastructure is what enables real-world use at scale. — André Casterman 🇦🇪

XDC Foundation

14,607 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Asset Chain (Asset Chain 🌍 (AI-RWA L1)) public mainnet is live. I am grateful to our team for their tireless work over the past two years. To us, this is not just another layer-one blockchain—it is a statement and a movement. We can no longer sit on the sidelines while other regions capture value from various industries, including blockchain technology, which has created a level playing field for all. The video is a bit long. I believe it will be worth your time. Please excuse any background noise, as it was recorded in an airport. Thank you. 😆

The Asset Chain (Asset Chain 🌍 (AI-RWA L1)) public mainnet is live. I am grateful to our team for their tireless work over the past two years. To us, this is not just another layer-one blockchain—it is a statement and a movement. We can no longer sit on the sidelines while other regions capture value from various industries, including blockchain technology, which has created a level playing field for all. The video is a bit long. I believe it will be worth your time. Please excuse any background noise, as it was recorded in an airport. Thank you. 😆

Ugochukwu Aronu 🕊

66,287 просмотров • 1 год назад

englot is the only thai gl couple who started their story with no script. everything about them has been real from the start. SHOW ME LOVE is their story & a gift for the fans. it may not be the best but this is more than just a series to us. we value beyond numbers & rankings.

englot is the only thai gl couple who started their story with no script. everything about them has been real from the start. SHOW ME LOVE is their story & a gift for the fans. it may not be the best but this is more than just a series to us. we value beyond numbers & rankings.

redlips.

21,750 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“AI is changing the value prop of software.” We spoke with Metronome CEO Scott Woody about why AI requires a new business model. “In the cloud era…the value of the software scales as your org scales.” “In AI, the software is now doing work on your behalf…so the core value of the software is not who in my org has access to the data, it's what can this software do for me? When the value shifts from access to output, the business model has to follow.

“AI is changing the value prop of software.” We spoke with Metronome CEO Scott Woody about why AI requires a new business model. “In the cloud era…the value of the software scales as your org scales.” “In AI, the software is now doing work on your behalf…so the core value of the software is not who in my org has access to the data, it's what can this software do for me? When the value shifts from access to output, the business model has to follow.

a16z

23,455 просмотров • 1 год назад

The idea that everyone is "paid what they're worth" has proven to be a cruelly effective way to put the blame on workers for not getting ahead — while giving the rich and powerful cover to rig the game for their own benefit. Don't buy it.

The idea that everyone is "paid what they're worth" has proven to be a cruelly effective way to put the blame on workers for not getting ahead — while giving the rich and powerful cover to rig the game for their own benefit. Don't buy it.

Robert Reich

313,418 просмотров • 3 лет назад

I have a question for you? A question for you to ponder A question to bring awareness to your answer A question for you to bring awareness to your reaction And to bring awareness of why you reacted the way you did Would be interested to see what comes up for people And please do bring awareness to your tone as negativity towards me is not welcome on my page #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #digital #newworld #goldendome

I have a question for you? A question for you to ponder A question to bring awareness to your answer A question for you to bring awareness to your reaction And to bring awareness of why you reacted the way you did Would be interested to see what comes up for people And please do bring awareness to your tone as negativity towards me is not welcome on my page #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #digital #newworld #goldendome

Harry The Soul Coach

20,736 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,124 просмотров • 15 дней назад

How Inflation Forces People to Use Houses as a Savings Vehicle Saifedean Ammous explains how inflation (which is caused by governments / banks increasing the money supply by interest credit expansion) which leads to the loss of fiat money’s value, has changed the way people think about housing. In the past, under a scarce money standard money held its value better, so people could save for the future by simply saving in gold. For example, a gold coin could sit under a mattress for years and still hold its value. You can't do that today with easily created fiat government money. Today, with inflation causing money to lose value people need to find other ways to store their wealth / purchasing power. Holding fiat cash or government interest bearing bonds means losing purchasing power in the long term, so many turn to real estate. Ammous argues that this has led people to treat houses as savings accounts, even though houses are consumer goods, not true investments. A house doesn’t produce anything; it’s something you use, like a car or a washing machine, it just lasts longer. This change is a direct result of inflation. Since money no longer holds its value, people feel forced to buy houses to protect their savings which they spent time and energy to work for and save. Instead of keeping cash in the bank, they buy a house. As inflation drives the value of money down, house prices go up in fiat terms. This creates the illusion of making money, but in reality it's an indication that the money we are forced to use by nation states is losing value every year. Ammous highlights the impact this has on young people. When someone in their 20s or 30s tries to buy a home, they’re not just competing with others their age. They’re also up against older people or investors who see houses as better options than holding cash. These investors might be dentists, architects,doctors ,or other professionals who don’t actually want to be landlords but buy homes and rent them out because it’s a way to escape inflation. This pushes house prices even higher, making it harder for young people to afford homes. Ammous also points out that treating houses as financial assets affects how they’re built. Developers prioritize profit over quality or beauty, leading to homes that lack character or durability. Houses are no longer designed as places to live and enjoy but as tools for storing wealth and beating inflation. This is a HUGE problem.

How Inflation Forces People to Use Houses as a Savings Vehicle Saifedean Ammous explains how inflation (which is caused by governments / banks increasing the money supply by interest credit expansion) which leads to the loss of fiat money’s value, has changed the way people think about housing. In the past, under a scarce money standard money held its value better, so people could save for the future by simply saving in gold. For example, a gold coin could sit under a mattress for years and still hold its value. You can't do that today with easily created fiat government money. Today, with inflation causing money to lose value people need to find other ways to store their wealth / purchasing power. Holding fiat cash or government interest bearing bonds means losing purchasing power in the long term, so many turn to real estate. Ammous argues that this has led people to treat houses as savings accounts, even though houses are consumer goods, not true investments. A house doesn’t produce anything; it’s something you use, like a car or a washing machine, it just lasts longer. This change is a direct result of inflation. Since money no longer holds its value, people feel forced to buy houses to protect their savings which they spent time and energy to work for and save. Instead of keeping cash in the bank, they buy a house. As inflation drives the value of money down, house prices go up in fiat terms. This creates the illusion of making money, but in reality it's an indication that the money we are forced to use by nation states is losing value every year. Ammous highlights the impact this has on young people. When someone in their 20s or 30s tries to buy a home, they’re not just competing with others their age. They’re also up against older people or investors who see houses as better options than holding cash. These investors might be dentists, architects,doctors ,or other professionals who don’t actually want to be landlords but buy homes and rent them out because it’s a way to escape inflation. This pushes house prices even higher, making it harder for young people to afford homes. Ammous also points out that treating houses as financial assets affects how they’re built. Developers prioritize profit over quality or beauty, leading to homes that lack character or durability. Houses are no longer designed as places to live and enjoy but as tools for storing wealth and beating inflation. This is a HUGE problem.

Akbar Zab

42,088 просмотров • 1 год назад