正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ugh, keep seeing the really boring "Simulation Theory" popping up on my feed. Don't you know the Hindus have been talking about a simulation theory since at least 3,000 years ago? We're currently in the final epoch known as Kali Yuga. It's the most violent, corrupt and degenerate epoch,... show more

Simpsons Daily Glavins

84,327 subscribers

51,071 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Ian Miles Cheong

39,414 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

21,944 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Wes Roth

63,562 次观看 • 7 个月前

🎥🍿🍿Tom was right. At the end of the movie the entire mars team passes away, and tom wakes up in a vat of goo and the aliens explain humanity is the first life form to realize it was in a simulation and passes its tests

🎥🍿🍿Tom was right. At the end of the movie the entire mars team passes away, and tom wakes up in a vat of goo and the aliens explain humanity is the first life form to realize it was in a simulation and passes its tests

WickedMonsterX

139,813 次观看 • 1 个月前

three months ago we started building epoch. as an experiment and ended up winning the Solana privacy hackathon, which landed us a sponsored NS trip by Superteam to keep building epoch from there. after arriving, it was a real rollercoaster, and the last month was especially hard, which is why we've been quiet. still, we shipped. epoch is live on devnet (a private prediction market on solana powered by Arcium ☂️), picked up good traction, got submitted to colosseum, and recently got a mention in messari's solana q1 report. so from now on, i’ve decided to document epoch’s journey and build in public. all the ups and downs, nothing filtered, everything raw. here's ep 1. hope you enjoy.

three months ago we started building epoch. as an experiment and ended up winning the Solana privacy hackathon, which landed us a sponsored NS trip by Superteam to keep building epoch from there. after arriving, it was a real rollercoaster, and the last month was especially hard, which is why we've been quiet. still, we shipped. epoch is live on devnet (a private prediction market on solana powered by Arcium ☂️), picked up good traction, got submitted to colosseum, and recently got a mention in messari's solana q1 report. so from now on, i’ve decided to document epoch’s journey and build in public. all the ups and downs, nothing filtered, everything raw. here's ep 1. hope you enjoy.

.svm

10,148 次观看 • 2 个月前

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Interstellar

11,295 次观看 • 2 个月前

Attention to all globers…. There’s a difference between the theory of gravity which is derived from the theory of relativity and the law of gravitation which describes gravitation as a constant in mathematical form. Gravity in the form of spacetime warping is a theory, this is why GR is titled ”The Theory Of Relativity” and not, “The Fact Of Relativity”. This takes nothing nothing more then a simple google search to figure out, just google it.

Attention to all globers…. There’s a difference between the theory of gravity which is derived from the theory of relativity and the law of gravitation which describes gravitation as a constant in mathematical form. Gravity in the form of spacetime warping is a theory, this is why GR is titled ”The Theory Of Relativity” and not, “The Fact Of Relativity”. This takes nothing nothing more then a simple google search to figure out, just google it.

Kaleb The Socrat

15,367 次观看 • 2 年前

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

₿en Wehrman

11,634 次观看 • 20 天前

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

ELON CLIPS

16,989 次观看 • 8 个月前

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

Jaynit

100,360 次观看 • 11 天前

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.

Interstellar

64,209 次观看 • 2 个月前

Freeman Dyson on the Greening of the Galaxy: "the galaxy is very boring as long as it's dead, you look at all these planets and stars we've discovered, they're beautiful, but still they're sort of boring. So I'd like to bring life to the universe and bring the universe to life"

Freeman Dyson on the Greening of the Galaxy: "the galaxy is very boring as long as it's dead, you look at all these planets and stars we've discovered, they're beautiful, but still they're sort of boring. So I'd like to bring life to the universe and bring the universe to life"

Fermat's Library

36,426 次观看 • 8 个月前

Rep Tim Burchett is furious over taxpayers being forced to spend billions on UAP and alien investigations, but then turning around and telling us they don’t exist “We’re up against corruption. We're up against a cover-up. This thing's been covered up at least since 1947 — the public deserves the right to know. It's your dadgum tax dollars. It's not about little green men or flying saucers. It's about what are we spending all these millions and possibly billions of dollars on that these idiots tell us don't exist, and then yet we turn right around in the skip and then they tell us they do exist. This is a cover-up. You all know it. We know it. We demand the answers, and dadgummit, we're going to get them” “You know they exist. You know this has been a cover-up since before most of y'all been born” From what I could find we have spent over $60 million dollars on investigations into aliens as taxpayers and then the majority of the other money is hidden behind “black budget projects” These are $90 billion dollars a year that we are forced to fund and have no transparency into what they’re doing Make it all public

Rep Tim Burchett is furious over taxpayers being forced to spend billions on UAP and alien investigations, but then turning around and telling us they don’t exist “We’re up against corruption. We're up against a cover-up. This thing's been covered up at least since 1947 — the public deserves the right to know. It's your dadgum tax dollars. It's not about little green men or flying saucers. It's about what are we spending all these millions and possibly billions of dollars on that these idiots tell us don't exist, and then yet we turn right around in the skip and then they tell us they do exist. This is a cover-up. You all know it. We know it. We demand the answers, and dadgummit, we're going to get them” “You know they exist. You know this has been a cover-up since before most of y'all been born” From what I could find we have spent over $60 million dollars on investigations into aliens as taxpayers and then the majority of the other money is hidden behind “black budget projects” These are $90 billion dollars a year that we are forced to fund and have no transparency into what they’re doing Make it all public

Wall Street Apes

35,412 次观看 • 1 个月前

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

392,573 次观看 • 1 年前

Qullamaggie on Why You Are Losing Money Most of the Time “This is actually one thing I got from Peter Brandt on his blog. He explained it really nicely. I never thought about it before. The most successful traders and investors are gonna be in a drawdown most of the time. Like even this year, even though I'm up at least 500%, I've spent half of the year in a drawdown, at least. So expecting to be like peak equity all the time, it's just not gonna happen. You're gonna spend most of your time in a drawdown, even on a really good year. That's just how it works. You just need to realize it and you need to accept it. Look at something like AMZN, one of the best stocks like ever, in the history of the world. It's up what? 200,000% since the IPO. Now look at the amount of time it's been in a drawdown. out of the 23 years it's been public, it was in a drawdown for 15 years. NFLX out of 8 years, it has been in a drawdown almost half of the time. Being in a drawdown is normal. It’s not an anomaly. The question is how big of a drawdown are you gonna be in. I try to limit my drawdowns to 10-15% but sometimes they become more severe than that. Drawdowns, it's the nature of the game. If you want to have big returns, you are going to have drawdowns. If you don't have drawdowns, it means you don't take any risk. And if you don't take any risk, you won't have any returns.”

Qullamaggie on Why You Are Losing Money Most of the Time “This is actually one thing I got from Peter Brandt on his blog. He explained it really nicely. I never thought about it before. The most successful traders and investors are gonna be in a drawdown most of the time. Like even this year, even though I'm up at least 500%, I've spent half of the year in a drawdown, at least. So expecting to be like peak equity all the time, it's just not gonna happen. You're gonna spend most of your time in a drawdown, even on a really good year. That's just how it works. You just need to realize it and you need to accept it. Look at something like AMZN, one of the best stocks like ever, in the history of the world. It's up what? 200,000% since the IPO. Now look at the amount of time it's been in a drawdown. out of the 23 years it's been public, it was in a drawdown for 15 years. NFLX out of 8 years, it has been in a drawdown almost half of the time. Being in a drawdown is normal. It’s not an anomaly. The question is how big of a drawdown are you gonna be in. I try to limit my drawdowns to 10-15% but sometimes they become more severe than that. Drawdowns, it's the nature of the game. If you want to have big returns, you are going to have drawdowns. If you don't have drawdowns, it means you don't take any risk. And if you don't take any risk, you won't have any returns.”

Lone

22,190 次观看 • 1 年前

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.

Philippe T

12,839 次观看 • 2 个月前

That is exactly why I keep talking about Chainspin The first two buybacks on PlayChainspin have already been completed, with more scheduled ahead.The team continues to deliver, and the momentum keeps building. In my view, it is one of the most promising onchain gaming projects currently building on Base. Ca: $SPIN 0xE399FE2ce6d2FdC0AD41Df5db203B55EF43Cbe7F

That is exactly why I keep talking about Chainspin The first two buybacks on PlayChainspin have already been completed, with more scheduled ahead.The team continues to deliver, and the momentum keeps building. In my view, it is one of the most promising onchain gaming projects currently building on Base. Ca: $SPIN 0xE399FE2ce6d2FdC0AD41Df5db203B55EF43Cbe7F

𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐡𝐚𝐛

23,927 次观看 • 1 个月前