Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Ugh, keep seeing the really boring "Simulation Theory" popping up on my feed. Don't you know the Hindus have been talking about a simulation theory since at least 3,000 years ago? We're currently in the final epoch known as Kali Yuga. It's the most violent, corrupt and degenerate epoch,... show more

Simpsons Daily Glavins

84,327 subscribers

51,071 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Ian Miles Cheong

39,414 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

21,944 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Elon Musk believes that we are in a simulation: "I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely" "If simulation theory is accurate this makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures they're going to stop the simulation when it gets boring" "This is what we do in reality. If SpaceX is doing simulations to understand how a rocket works we run all these simulations in the computer" "The simulations that we pay attention to are the ones that are the most interesting" "We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good" "If you apply Darwin to simulation theory then only the most interesting simulations will continue" "Therefore the most interesting outcome is the most likely because it's either that or annihilation" "So really we have one goal. Keep it interesting."

Elon Musk believes that we are in a simulation: "I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely" "If simulation theory is accurate this makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures they're going to stop the simulation when it gets boring" "This is what we do in reality. If SpaceX is doing simulations to understand how a rocket works we run all these simulations in the computer" "The simulations that we pay attention to are the ones that are the most interesting" "We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good" "If you apply Darwin to simulation theory then only the most interesting simulations will continue" "Therefore the most interesting outcome is the most likely because it's either that or annihilation" "So really we have one goal. Keep it interesting."

Brad

143,269 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Wes Roth

63,562 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🎥🍿🍿Tom was right. At the end of the movie the entire mars team passes away, and tom wakes up in a vat of goo and the aliens explain humanity is the first life form to realize it was in a simulation and passes its tests

🎥🍿🍿Tom was right. At the end of the movie the entire mars team passes away, and tom wakes up in a vat of goo and the aliens explain humanity is the first life form to realize it was in a simulation and passes its tests

WickedMonsterX

139,813 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

three months ago we started building epoch. as an experiment and ended up winning the Solana privacy hackathon, which landed us a sponsored NS trip by Superteam to keep building epoch from there. after arriving, it was a real rollercoaster, and the last month was especially hard, which is why we've been quiet. still, we shipped. epoch is live on devnet (a private prediction market on solana powered by Arcium), picked up good traction, got submitted to colosseum, and recently got a mention in messari's solana q1 report. so from now on, i’ve decided to document epoch’s journey and build in public. all the ups and downs, nothing filtered, everything raw. here's ep 1. hope you enjoy.

three months ago we started building epoch. as an experiment and ended up winning the Solana privacy hackathon, which landed us a sponsored NS trip by Superteam to keep building epoch from there. after arriving, it was a real rollercoaster, and the last month was especially hard, which is why we've been quiet. still, we shipped. epoch is live on devnet (a private prediction market on solana powered by Arcium), picked up good traction, got submitted to colosseum, and recently got a mention in messari's solana q1 report. so from now on, i’ve decided to document epoch’s journey and build in public. all the ups and downs, nothing filtered, everything raw. here's ep 1. hope you enjoy.

.svm

10,227 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Interstellar

11,295 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Attention to all globers…. There’s a difference between the theory of gravity which is derived from the theory of relativity and the law of gravitation which describes gravitation as a constant in mathematical form. Gravity in the form of spacetime warping is a theory, this is why GR is titled ”The Theory Of Relativity” and not, “The Fact Of Relativity”. This takes nothing nothing more then a simple google search to figure out, just google it.

Attention to all globers…. There’s a difference between the theory of gravity which is derived from the theory of relativity and the law of gravitation which describes gravitation as a constant in mathematical form. Gravity in the form of spacetime warping is a theory, this is why GR is titled ”The Theory Of Relativity” and not, “The Fact Of Relativity”. This takes nothing nothing more then a simple google search to figure out, just google it.

Kaleb The Socrat

15,375 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Everyone assumed string theory was finally dying. It's not dying. It's worse. Physicists have written more papers on string theory than on any other idea in the field's history. Fifty years of work. It has never once produced a testable prediction. Last week an essay asked the question directly: is string theory still our best hope for a theory of everything? The answer given was yes. Here's the actual argument behind that yes. String theory is "inevitable" — as long as you first assume a universe that doesn't exist. That's not a rebuttal to the critics. That's the entire case for the defense. 50 years. 100,000+ papers. Entire careers built on a framework nobody has ever tested, defended by physicists who now have to assume a fictional universe just to keep it alive. Is this still physics, or is it the most expensive tautology in the history of science?

Everyone assumed string theory was finally dying. It's not dying. It's worse. Physicists have written more papers on string theory than on any other idea in the field's history. Fifty years of work. It has never once produced a testable prediction. Last week an essay asked the question directly: is string theory still our best hope for a theory of everything? The answer given was yes. Here's the actual argument behind that yes. String theory is "inevitable" — as long as you first assume a universe that doesn't exist. That's not a rebuttal to the critics. That's the entire case for the defense. 50 years. 100,000+ papers. Entire careers built on a framework nobody has ever tested, defended by physicists who now have to assume a fictional universe just to keep it alive. Is this still physics, or is it the most expensive tautology in the history of science?

Alex Carten

38,340 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

₿en Wehrman

11,634 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

ELON CLIPS

16,989 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

Jaynit

102,135 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk: “I can’t believe these things are actually happening. It makes me believe in simulation theory.” “My life feels somewhat surreal… the things I’m doing are so preposterous that it’s hard to believe they’re real.” In his recent Economist interview the SpaceX founder explained how the sheer scale of what he is building has made him take simulation theory more seriously. “I can’t believe these things are actually happening. It makes me believe in simulation theory.” He pointed directly at Starship: “We’ve got Starship, which is the largest, most powerful flying object ever made, and we intend to launch that more than once per hour.” The idea that reality could be a high fidelity simulation has long been a philosophical possibility. What makes Musk’s remark land is the concrete evidence he is living through every day: a vehicle the size of a skyscraper designed for rapid reuse and eventual Mars flights. When the work itself feels too ambitious to be real, the simulation hypothesis stops being abstract and starts feeling like the simplest explanation.

Elon Musk: “I can’t believe these things are actually happening. It makes me believe in simulation theory.” “My life feels somewhat surreal… the things I’m doing are so preposterous that it’s hard to believe they’re real.” In his recent Economist interview the SpaceX founder explained how the sheer scale of what he is building has made him take simulation theory more seriously. “I can’t believe these things are actually happening. It makes me believe in simulation theory.” He pointed directly at Starship: “We’ve got Starship, which is the largest, most powerful flying object ever made, and we intend to launch that more than once per hour.” The idea that reality could be a high fidelity simulation has long been a philosophical possibility. What makes Musk’s remark land is the concrete evidence he is living through every day: a vehicle the size of a skyscraper designed for rapid reuse and eventual Mars flights. When the work itself feels too ambitious to be real, the simulation hypothesis stops being abstract and starts feeling like the simplest explanation.

Interstellar

10,245 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.

Elon Musk: "There’s a one in billions chance we’re in base reality" 40 years ago we had Pong two rectangles and a dot. Now we have photorealistic 3D simulations. If you assume any rate of improvement at all games will become indistinguishable from reality. Musk adds if simulation theory is true it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring.

Interstellar

64,307 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Freeman Dyson on the Greening of the Galaxy: "the galaxy is very boring as long as it's dead, you look at all these planets and stars we've discovered, they're beautiful, but still they're sort of boring. So I'd like to bring life to the universe and bring the universe to life"

Freeman Dyson on the Greening of the Galaxy: "the galaxy is very boring as long as it's dead, you look at all these planets and stars we've discovered, they're beautiful, but still they're sort of boring. So I'd like to bring life to the universe and bring the universe to life"

Fermat's Library

36,426 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Chase Hughes on Simulation Theory: “Separation is the GREATEST LIE ever told to the entire world.” The behavior expert and former military interrogation trainer says dreams reveal how reality actually works. In a dream the distance between you and a fireplace is made of the same substance as the fireplace itself, which is made of the same substance as you. Everything is recursive back to one point of consciousness. There is no actual distance and no actual other. It is all you. He ties this to the first Hermetic principle written thousands of years ago: all is mind, the universe is mental. Quantum physics keeps circling the same idea. Matter is mostly empty space. Observation changes outcomes. What looks solid and separate may be consciousness appearing to itself as objects, people, and distance. Hughes asks whether waking life is simply the next layer, a shared dream rather than a private one. If that is true, the feeling that you are cut off from everyone and everything is the oldest and most effective lie ever sold.

Chase Hughes on Simulation Theory: “Separation is the GREATEST LIE ever told to the entire world.” The behavior expert and former military interrogation trainer says dreams reveal how reality actually works. In a dream the distance between you and a fireplace is made of the same substance as the fireplace itself, which is made of the same substance as you. Everything is recursive back to one point of consciousness. There is no actual distance and no actual other. It is all you. He ties this to the first Hermetic principle written thousands of years ago: all is mind, the universe is mental. Quantum physics keeps circling the same idea. Matter is mostly empty space. Observation changes outcomes. What looks solid and separate may be consciousness appearing to itself as objects, people, and distance. Hughes asks whether waking life is simply the next layer, a shared dream rather than a private one. If that is true, the feeling that you are cut off from everyone and everything is the oldest and most effective lie ever sold.

Interstellar

62,427 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

i have a lingering #silo theory that if anyone sitting at this table is still alive then 300 years have not passed since the explosion— my guess is at most 50 years, and they have been giving 'vitamin D' to the populations over the years to make them forget.

i have a lingering #silo theory that if anyone sitting at this table is still alive then 300 years have not passed since the explosion— my guess is at most 50 years, and they have been giving 'vitamin D' to the populations over the years to make them forget.

InvertedParadX, PhD

165,451 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Rep Tim Burchett is furious over taxpayers being forced to spend billions on UAP and alien investigations, but then turning around and telling us they don’t exist “We’re up against corruption. We're up against a cover-up. This thing's been covered up at least since 1947 — the public deserves the right to know. It's your dadgum tax dollars. It's not about little green men or flying saucers. It's about what are we spending all these millions and possibly billions of dollars on that these idiots tell us don't exist, and then yet we turn right around in the skip and then they tell us they do exist. This is a cover-up. You all know it. We know it. We demand the answers, and dadgummit, we're going to get them” “You know they exist. You know this has been a cover-up since before most of y'all been born” From what I could find we have spent over $60 million dollars on investigations into aliens as taxpayers and then the majority of the other money is hidden behind “black budget projects” These are $90 billion dollars a year that we are forced to fund and have no transparency into what they’re doing Make it all public

Rep Tim Burchett is furious over taxpayers being forced to spend billions on UAP and alien investigations, but then turning around and telling us they don’t exist “We’re up against corruption. We're up against a cover-up. This thing's been covered up at least since 1947 — the public deserves the right to know. It's your dadgum tax dollars. It's not about little green men or flying saucers. It's about what are we spending all these millions and possibly billions of dollars on that these idiots tell us don't exist, and then yet we turn right around in the skip and then they tell us they do exist. This is a cover-up. You all know it. We know it. We demand the answers, and dadgummit, we're going to get them” “You know they exist. You know this has been a cover-up since before most of y'all been born” From what I could find we have spent over $60 million dollars on investigations into aliens as taxpayers and then the majority of the other money is hidden behind “black budget projects” These are $90 billion dollars a year that we are forced to fund and have no transparency into what they’re doing Make it all public

Wall Street Apes

35,412 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten