Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

UK-based journalist Adil Raja claims that under the ‘third-party validation’ component of Pakistan’s $1.2 million, two-year lobbying contract with Washington-based Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC, some Indian thinkers, columnists, and voices based in the U.S. and within India have also been brought on board. The lobbying agreement, reportedly worth...

20,900 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Siddhant Nagrath’s core line in that Oxford Union “India vs Pakistan” debate is that Pakistan’s structure and incentives make sustained hostility and even war with India politically and economically attractive for those who hold power there, and that this is stabilised not restrained by its nuclear posture. ​ Nagrath argues that for 77 years Pakistan’s ruling establishment has had strong incentives to maintain confrontation with India, including the possibility of military action. ​ He contends that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons do not create responsible restraint but instead enable aggressive behaviour under a protective umbrella. ​ He claims it is “politically infeasible” and “economically infeasible” for those who hold the money, power, and politics in Pakistan to avoid war, because conflict sustains their position. ​ According to him, when there is Indo‑Pak conflict, it is not Indian leaders like Narendra Modi whose electoral prospects improve most, but Pakistan’s power brokers, who gain legitimacy and resources from crisis. ​ Terrorism and security argument Nagrath asserts that Pakistan has systematically given terrorists a home, weapons, training, military aid, intelligence support, and guidance on where and how to strike India. ​ On this basis, he argues India faces a security environment in which Pakistan-backed terrorism and the threat of escalation are entrenched tools of state policy rather than aberrations. ​ Rebuttal to “nuclear stabiliser” claim Responding to the proposition’s portrayal of Pakistan as a “great nuclear” stabilising power, he suggests nuclear capability has not translated into responsible de‑escalation. ​ Instead, he frames Pakistan’s nuclear status as part of a bargaining strategy that allows it to internationalise crises and shield itself while continuing support to terror networks. Debate Context The event occurred amid prior Oxford Union controversies, including a collapsed India-Pakistan debate where Nagrath and peers like Viraansh Bhanushali participated after Indian leaders withdrew. Nagrath has debated Kashmir issues before, opposing independence motions. The video has garnered views on the Oxford Union channel, reflecting interest in India-Pakistan geopolitical discourse. Credit : Oxford Union.

Augadh

23,879 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#ISPR A delegation of the United States Congress, led by Honourable Jack Bergman alongwith Honourable Thomas Souzzi and Honourable Jonathan Jackson called on General Syed Asim Munir, NI (M), Chief of Army Staff (#COAS), #Pakistan Army, today. Discussions during the meeting encompassed a range of issues of mutual interest, with particular emphasis on regional security and defence cooperation. Both sides reaffirmed the importance of sustained engagement based on mutual respect, shared values, and converging strategic interests. The visiting U.S. lawmakers commended the Pakistan Armed Forces for their pivotal role in combating terrorism and acknowledged Pakistan’s enduring contributions to regional peace and stability. They also expressed deep appreciation for Pakistan’s resilience and the strategic potential of its people. Underscoring their respect for Pakistan’s sovereignty, the U.S. Congressional delegation conveyed a strong commitment to advancing broad-based bilateral cooperation, particularly in the domains of security, trade, investment, and economic development. General Syed Asim Munir conveyed his appreciation to the delegation for their visit and reiterated Pakistan’s desire to further deepen and diversify its longstanding partnership with the United States in a manner that is mutually beneficial and respectful of each other’s national interests. During the meeting MoUs were also signed for training collaboration in the field of Information Technology.

Pakistan Armed Forces News 🇵🇰

15,374 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

For decades, Chaudhry Tariq Mahmood, who is associated with the Pakistan Patriotic Front UK, has been a familiar face at sponsored protests outside Indian diplomatic missions in Britain. He has taken pride in participating in and helping to organise agitations attended by hundreds, often marketed as pro-Kashmir demonstrations but frequently featuring Islamists and Khalistani militants, some of whom are wanted in India over acts of terror and violence. Now, in an interview with ex-Pakistan Army Major Adil Raja, he says he regrets siding with the Pakistani military and organising events at its behest because ‘they use and then abuse people’. Adil Raja, who now lives in the United Kingdom and has become a vocal critic of Pakistan’s military, has himself faced legal and political controversies in Pakistan and abroad. According to Tariq’s account in the interview, he believes he was used by the very establishment he supported until days ago. The irony is difficult to miss. A man who spent years protesting outside the Indian High Commission in London and advancing causes aligned with Pakistan’s strategic interests now finds himself abandoned and vilified by the very same system. This is especially revealing because, in an earlier appearance on Adil Raja’s YouTube channel, Tariq repeatedly referred to Indian security forces in Jammu and Kashmir as ‘kafir forces’, language that reflects a deeply sectarian worldview and suggests that, for some activists, hostility towards India is not political but merely rooted in religious antagonism. Such rhetoric has long raised questions about whether these overseas protests, marketed as human rights or pro-Kashmir demonstrations, are, in reality, vehicles for a more divisive ideological agenda. And this is where the story becomes larger than one man. History is full of people who believed they were serving a cause, only to discover they were being used as instruments. Hatred can be a powerful mobilising force, but it is rarely a stable foundation for a life or a movement. Tariq has also been designated a terrorist by the Pakistani authorities. In the interview, he appears amused that India never did the same and takes credit for it, saying it was because he was innocent. Maybe, Tariq, you were not so innocent. India simply chose not to be as harsh on you as the people you served, even though you spent years protesting against it and vilifying its institutions. And perhaps that is the final irony of all: the people you hated so much as ‘kafirs’ were not, after all, the villains of your story.

Sonam Mahajan

20,847 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce