Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇺🇸🇷🇺 “UKRAINE’S WAR CAN ONLY END IF PUTIN OR KYIV FALL” 2 radically different visions of the Ukraine war. 2 starkly opposed truths. In a fiery debate, Jonathan Fink (Jonathan Fink 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 Silicon Curtain Podcast) and Mark Sleboda (Mark Sleboda) lay out why a peace deal may never...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,771,990 subscribers

2,453,015 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "RUSSIA HAS NO INCENTIVE TO CONQUER EUROPE” Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive dismantles the logic behind offering Ukraine Article 5-style protection: if NATO won't directly engage Russia today to save Ukraine, why would it risk nuclear war tomorrow? Meanwhile, Russia is self-sufficient in resources and has zero incentive to invade Poland or the Baltics. The real threat, Davis argues, isn't Russian expansion - it's NATO's escalation pushing Moscow into a corner. “If we're not willing to fight a war against Russia right now, why does anyone think that we're going to be willing to fight one later? Why would it be in the interest of any European country, America, Poland, anybody to go to war against Russia because of Ukraine, when they themselves are not at threat? The only way they get a threat is if they go into a war against Russia. Russia is not planning on going to war against any other NATO country, whatever anyone may say. Putin reiterated just 24 hours ago, they have no intention of doing that.”
3:20

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "RUSSIA HAS NO INCENTIVE TO CONQUER EUROPE” Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive dismantles the logic behind offering Ukraine Article 5-style protection: if NATO won't directly engage Russia today to save Ukraine, why would it risk nuclear war tomorrow? Meanwhile, Russia is self-sufficient in resources and has zero incentive to invade Poland or the Baltics. The real threat, Davis argues, isn't Russian expansion - it's NATO's escalation pushing Moscow into a corner. “If we're not willing to fight a war against Russia right now, why does anyone think that we're going to be willing to fight one later? Why would it be in the interest of any European country, America, Poland, anybody to go to war against Russia because of Ukraine, when they themselves are not at threat? The only way they get a threat is if they go into a war against Russia. Russia is not planning on going to war against any other NATO country, whatever anyone may say. Putin reiterated just 24 hours ago, they have no intention of doing that.”

Mario Nawfal

20,902 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Victor Davis Hanson: The West Has the Power to Stop Russia. So Why Don’t We? Why doesn’t NATO give Ukraine the weapons to win the war against Russia outright? It's because nuclear threats from Putin’s circle still shape Western decision-making, even if most of it is bluff. Add in U.S. political pressure from Trump voters who oppose “forever wars,” and the path to stopping Russia becomes far more complicated than it looks. But Ukraine is the invaded underdog and a rare, militarily capable ally, which is why America still supports it. Victor Davis Hanson explains:
1:47

Victor Davis Hanson: The West Has the Power to Stop Russia. So Why Don’t We? Why doesn’t NATO give Ukraine the weapons to win the war against Russia outright? It's because nuclear threats from Putin’s circle still shape Western decision-making, even if most of it is bluff. Add in U.S. political pressure from Trump voters who oppose “forever wars,” and the path to stopping Russia becomes far more complicated than it looks. But Ukraine is the invaded underdog and a rare, militarily capable ally, which is why America still supports it. Victor Davis Hanson explains:

The Daily Signal

18,906 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨🇺🇦 THE PEACE DEAL THAT COULD BREAK UKRAINE IN HALF A leaked 28 point plan is exploding across Washington and Kyiv, demanding that Ukraine surrender territory, potentially slash its military, give up long range weapons, accept neutrality, and ban all foreign troops. And Ukraine was not even allowed in the room when the deal was discussed. Pyotr Kurzin calls the plan a forced surrender. Mark Sleboda argues Ukraine is caught between great powers and no longer steering the war. The exchange gets intense immediately. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why the plan pushes Ukraine out of Donetsk, Luhansk and other key regions •⁠ ⁠How the US could shut off support if Kyiv refuses •⁠ ⁠Why Russia is taking major losses but still pushing forward •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s shifting Ukraine policy is blowing up global calculations •⁠ ⁠How Europe is struggling to keep influence as the power map tilts •⁠ ⁠Why new corruption scandals inside Kyiv are detonating the inner circle •⁠ ⁠And why both sides warn the real outcome will be decided by economics, not territory Pressure is building on every front. The stakes are rising fast. And if this plan gains traction, it could reshape the balance of power in Europe overnight. 00:57 – Trump’s leaked 28-point peace plan surfaces 01:43 – Plan details: territory, demilitarization, neutrality 03:19 – Pyotr says the plan matches Russia’s maximalist demands 05:41 – Is accepting the deal outright capitulation for Ukraine 06:06 – Mark calls Kyiv a proxy regime dependent on US support 08:32 – Who is actually calling the shots in this war 08:46 – Pyotr says this is a US–Russia power struggle and Trump flips 11:00 – Does Ukraine have any real say in a peace agreement 12:34 – Mark says Trump has no coherent foreign policy 14:38 – Mark claims the US is firing ballistic missiles into Russia 17:20 – Problems with US security guarantees for a demilitarized Ukraine 17:36 – Pyotr says “you can’t square that circle,” calls it “ballocks” 18:16 – Ukraine’s manpower crisis as fighting-age men flee 19:50 – Debate over which side is more corrupt 21:14 – Pyotr bets 100 grand the peace deal won’t happen 21:33 – Mark says Ukraine’s choice is to throw men into the grinder 22:41 – Military importance of the battle for Pokrovsky 24:18 – Pyotr says the war is settled by economics, not cities 27:13 – Mark says Pokrovsky provides commanding heights 28:53 – Mark says Russian losses are low while Ukraine is hit by FABs 31:47 – Putin’s grip on power and purging of 23 generals 33:13 – Pyotr says Russia lost the Caucasus due to overstretch in Ukraine 35:36 – Pyotr argues sanctions are working and Russia is losing tech 37:33 – Mark says Russia decoupling from the West is beneficial 47:33 – Russian incursions into NATO territory and NATO’s response 52:16 – Pyotr says railway sabotage was a Russian hybrid attack 58:59 – Mark says the railway hit was a good false-flag operation
59:44

🚨🇺🇦 THE PEACE DEAL THAT COULD BREAK UKRAINE IN HALF A leaked 28 point plan is exploding across Washington and Kyiv, demanding that Ukraine surrender territory, potentially slash its military, give up long range weapons, accept neutrality, and ban all foreign troops. And Ukraine was not even allowed in the room when the deal was discussed. Pyotr Kurzin calls the plan a forced surrender. Mark Sleboda argues Ukraine is caught between great powers and no longer steering the war. The exchange gets intense immediately. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why the plan pushes Ukraine out of Donetsk, Luhansk and other key regions •⁠ ⁠How the US could shut off support if Kyiv refuses •⁠ ⁠Why Russia is taking major losses but still pushing forward •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s shifting Ukraine policy is blowing up global calculations •⁠ ⁠How Europe is struggling to keep influence as the power map tilts •⁠ ⁠Why new corruption scandals inside Kyiv are detonating the inner circle •⁠ ⁠And why both sides warn the real outcome will be decided by economics, not territory Pressure is building on every front. The stakes are rising fast. And if this plan gains traction, it could reshape the balance of power in Europe overnight. 00:57 – Trump’s leaked 28-point peace plan surfaces 01:43 – Plan details: territory, demilitarization, neutrality 03:19 – Pyotr says the plan matches Russia’s maximalist demands 05:41 – Is accepting the deal outright capitulation for Ukraine 06:06 – Mark calls Kyiv a proxy regime dependent on US support 08:32 – Who is actually calling the shots in this war 08:46 – Pyotr says this is a US–Russia power struggle and Trump flips 11:00 – Does Ukraine have any real say in a peace agreement 12:34 – Mark says Trump has no coherent foreign policy 14:38 – Mark claims the US is firing ballistic missiles into Russia 17:20 – Problems with US security guarantees for a demilitarized Ukraine 17:36 – Pyotr says “you can’t square that circle,” calls it “ballocks” 18:16 – Ukraine’s manpower crisis as fighting-age men flee 19:50 – Debate over which side is more corrupt 21:14 – Pyotr bets 100 grand the peace deal won’t happen 21:33 – Mark says Ukraine’s choice is to throw men into the grinder 22:41 – Military importance of the battle for Pokrovsky 24:18 – Pyotr says the war is settled by economics, not cities 27:13 – Mark says Pokrovsky provides commanding heights 28:53 – Mark says Russian losses are low while Ukraine is hit by FABs 31:47 – Putin’s grip on power and purging of 23 generals 33:13 – Pyotr says Russia lost the Caucasus due to overstretch in Ukraine 35:36 – Pyotr argues sanctions are working and Russia is losing tech 37:33 – Mark says Russia decoupling from the West is beneficial 47:33 – Russian incursions into NATO territory and NATO’s response 52:16 – Pyotr says railway sabotage was a Russian hybrid attack 58:59 – Mark says the railway hit was a good false-flag operation

Mario Nawfal

968,929 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦TRUMP: I BELIEVE PUTIN WANTS PEACE. IT'S MUCH EASIER TO NEGOTIATE WITH RUSSIA THAN WITH UKRAINE. WE HAVE GOOD RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA. I believe Putin, everything is fine with Russia and me. But now they are bombing Ukraine hard. To be honest, it is more difficult for me with Ukraine, and they have no trump cards (c) Donald Trump Trump negatively answered the question about whether Russia is "taking advantage" of the US pause in providing weapons and intelligence to Ukraine Trump, when asked why he does not give Ukraine weapons for self-defense: because I do not see that they will conclude a peace agreement. If they do not want to conclude a deal, then we will not participate in the supplies. Something has to happen on Iran soon. I hope we can make a deal - Trump ❗️ We will "leave" Ukraine if it does not want a settlement of the conflict - Trump "I'm not sure Ukraine wants to negotiate. I want Ukraine to calm down! Money is what comes first for me," Trump emphasized. ❗️Putin did not want to start a conflict in Ukraine — Trump Europe has no idea how to end the conflict in Ukraine, Trump believes. ❗️The United States will cut off aid to Ukraine if Kiev is not ready for a settlement, Trump promised
0:18

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦TRUMP: I BELIEVE PUTIN WANTS PEACE. IT'S MUCH EASIER TO NEGOTIATE WITH RUSSIA THAN WITH UKRAINE. WE HAVE GOOD RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA. I believe Putin, everything is fine with Russia and me. But now they are bombing Ukraine hard. To be honest, it is more difficult for me with Ukraine, and they have no trump cards (c) Donald Trump Trump negatively answered the question about whether Russia is "taking advantage" of the US pause in providing weapons and intelligence to Ukraine Trump, when asked why he does not give Ukraine weapons for self-defense: because I do not see that they will conclude a peace agreement. If they do not want to conclude a deal, then we will not participate in the supplies. Something has to happen on Iran soon. I hope we can make a deal - Trump ❗️ We will "leave" Ukraine if it does not want a settlement of the conflict - Trump "I'm not sure Ukraine wants to negotiate. I want Ukraine to calm down! Money is what comes first for me," Trump emphasized. ❗️Putin did not want to start a conflict in Ukraine — Trump Europe has no idea how to end the conflict in Ukraine, Trump believes. ❗️The United States will cut off aid to Ukraine if Kiev is not ready for a settlement, Trump promised

DD Geopolitics

30,598 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Every single day, Russian terror continues, and every single day, the Russians reject the possibility of ending this war – of ceasing fire and truly talking about peace. We in Ukraine have responded positively to all proposals from the U.S. and President Trump to end all these attacks and killings. Ukraine has also proactively put forward various formats to bring the war to an end. It is Putin alone who is interested in these killings. Every day, this war remains solely his war – the war of Russia alone. And we expect the world to draw conclusions from this. Especially after the drone incursions into Poland – a country that is extremely important for the security of all Europe. A country that respects America and President Trump. It is crucial that Europe truly understands: when it comes to Russia, it is not about one neighbor or another, it is about everyone. Otherwise, Russia will draw its own conclusions and only expand the war – and not necessarily against Ukraine alone.
4:37

Every single day, Russian terror continues, and every single day, the Russians reject the possibility of ending this war – of ceasing fire and truly talking about peace. We in Ukraine have responded positively to all proposals from the U.S. and President Trump to end all these attacks and killings. Ukraine has also proactively put forward various formats to bring the war to an end. It is Putin alone who is interested in these killings. Every day, this war remains solely his war – the war of Russia alone. And we expect the world to draw conclusions from this. Especially after the drone incursions into Poland – a country that is extremely important for the security of all Europe. A country that respects America and President Trump. It is crucial that Europe truly understands: when it comes to Russia, it is not about one neighbor or another, it is about everyone. Otherwise, Russia will draw its own conclusions and only expand the war – and not necessarily against Ukraine alone.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

323,567 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨🇷🇺 LT. GENERAL YEVGENY BUZHINSKY ON NATO, NUCLEAR WAR, AND U.S-RUSSIA RELATIONS Lt. General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, the mastermind behind some of the biggest weapons treaties of the past 40 years—including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty—sat down with me for a rare and unfiltered interview. From NATO’s role in escalating global tensions to Trump’s return and its impact on U.S-Russia relations, Buzhinsky provides a behind-the-scenes look at how Russia views the world—and what it might take to end the war in Ukraine. 1:18 - “The IMF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty constrained us.” 5:21 - NATO: How it impacted Russia. 7:58 - The relationship between Russia and the U.S. 9:41 - Nuclear war looming? - “The escalation is imminent.” 12:59 - NATO and U.S crossing red lines. 15:22 - Putin’s response to missiles and Trump’s return. 19:41 - Opinions on the new U.S administration - “Ukraine is not an American ally.” 21:24 - Trump’s plans for peace. 25:03 - Could Russia and the U.S become allies? 30:58 - How Ukraine and Russia could end the war. 37:19 - Russia’s losses are an exaggeration? 40:48 - Russia’s terms for a ceasefire. 45:52 - Russia and North Korea: “Who said we need support?”
50:42

🚨🇷🇺 LT. GENERAL YEVGENY BUZHINSKY ON NATO, NUCLEAR WAR, AND U.S-RUSSIA RELATIONS Lt. General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, the mastermind behind some of the biggest weapons treaties of the past 40 years—including the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty—sat down with me for a rare and unfiltered interview. From NATO’s role in escalating global tensions to Trump’s return and its impact on U.S-Russia relations, Buzhinsky provides a behind-the-scenes look at how Russia views the world—and what it might take to end the war in Ukraine. 1:18 - “The IMF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty constrained us.” 5:21 - NATO: How it impacted Russia. 7:58 - The relationship between Russia and the U.S. 9:41 - Nuclear war looming? - “The escalation is imminent.” 12:59 - NATO and U.S crossing red lines. 15:22 - Putin’s response to missiles and Trump’s return. 19:41 - Opinions on the new U.S administration - “Ukraine is not an American ally.” 21:24 - Trump’s plans for peace. 25:03 - Could Russia and the U.S become allies? 30:58 - How Ukraine and Russia could end the war. 37:19 - Russia’s losses are an exaggeration? 40:48 - Russia’s terms for a ceasefire. 45:52 - Russia and North Korea: “Who said we need support?”

Mario Nawfal

2,350,199 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "WHY SHOULD RUSSIA FREEZE THE WAR WHEN IT’S WINNING AND THE WEST KEEPS ARMING KYIV?" After years of war, Western diplomats still talk about “freezing the lines” and finding “security guarantees”, but for Russia, any deal that leaves Donbas under Kyiv’s rule, or NATO anywhere near Ukraine, is a non-starter. The goals of the military operation are clear, and until they’re met, Moscow sees no reason to pause while the West rearms. "Russia is winning the counter on the right. The rules of the special military operation are clear. When its goals are met diplomatically or militarily, the conflict will end. Otherwise, they’ll just give the West a chance to rearm, like after Minsk I and II. NATO in Ukraine is what Russia went to war to prevent, that’s not going to be acceptable under any terms. Freezing the lines would leave large areas of Donbas, Kherson and Zaporozhye under the control of a radically anti-Russian regime. That’s simply not acceptable to the Russian people, the Russian government, or East Ukrainians like my own family." Mark Sleboda
3:00

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "WHY SHOULD RUSSIA FREEZE THE WAR WHEN IT’S WINNING AND THE WEST KEEPS ARMING KYIV?" After years of war, Western diplomats still talk about “freezing the lines” and finding “security guarantees”, but for Russia, any deal that leaves Donbas under Kyiv’s rule, or NATO anywhere near Ukraine, is a non-starter. The goals of the military operation are clear, and until they’re met, Moscow sees no reason to pause while the West rearms. "Russia is winning the counter on the right. The rules of the special military operation are clear. When its goals are met diplomatically or militarily, the conflict will end. Otherwise, they’ll just give the West a chance to rearm, like after Minsk I and II. NATO in Ukraine is what Russia went to war to prevent, that’s not going to be acceptable under any terms. Freezing the lines would leave large areas of Donbas, Kherson and Zaporozhye under the control of a radically anti-Russian regime. That’s simply not acceptable to the Russian people, the Russian government, or East Ukrainians like my own family." Mark Sleboda

Mario Nawfal

12,241 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "THE U.S. IS WALKING AWAY AND EUROPE CAN'T BREAK RUSSIA ALONE AS THE WAR TURNS AGAINST UKRAINE" Is Ukraine truly collapsing under a grinding war of attrition, or is that entire narrative distorting what is actually happening? Glenn Diesen argues that Ukraine is being worn down on every level, from manpower and equipment to its economy and international support. He claims the West has pushed Ukraine into a fight it cannot sustain and has refused to negotiate even as Ukrainian losses rise. Jonathan Fink rejects that view outright. He says many of these points mirror familiar Kremlin narratives and ignore Russia’s own harsh mobilization practices and internal repression. He also insists Ukraine’s political movements were genuine national efforts, not Western manipulation, and argues that Russia created the threats it now blames on NATO. Both describe the same war, yet in completely different ways, which makes any clear path to peace feel out of reach. "Ukraine is taking many times more casualties than Russia. You can measure Ukrainian exhaustion in manpower, military equipment, logistics, and a collapsing economy. The U.S. is walking away, and if the U.S. and Europe could not break Russia together, Europe cannot do it alone. Ukrainians are being dragged out of their homes to fill the front lines while in Russia they are volunteers. All the metrics are moving more and more in Russia’s favor every day." Glenn Diesen
7:33

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "THE U.S. IS WALKING AWAY AND EUROPE CAN'T BREAK RUSSIA ALONE AS THE WAR TURNS AGAINST UKRAINE" Is Ukraine truly collapsing under a grinding war of attrition, or is that entire narrative distorting what is actually happening? Glenn Diesen argues that Ukraine is being worn down on every level, from manpower and equipment to its economy and international support. He claims the West has pushed Ukraine into a fight it cannot sustain and has refused to negotiate even as Ukrainian losses rise. Jonathan Fink rejects that view outright. He says many of these points mirror familiar Kremlin narratives and ignore Russia’s own harsh mobilization practices and internal repression. He also insists Ukraine’s political movements were genuine national efforts, not Western manipulation, and argues that Russia created the threats it now blames on NATO. Both describe the same war, yet in completely different ways, which makes any clear path to peace feel out of reach. "Ukraine is taking many times more casualties than Russia. You can measure Ukrainian exhaustion in manpower, military equipment, logistics, and a collapsing economy. The U.S. is walking away, and if the U.S. and Europe could not break Russia together, Europe cannot do it alone. Ukrainians are being dragged out of their homes to fill the front lines while in Russia they are volunteers. All the metrics are moving more and more in Russia’s favor every day." Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

54,805 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

‼️🇷🇺 🇺🇦 BREAKING NEWS ! PUTIN has just declared that RUSSIA is GOING to take FULL CONTROL of all of UKRAINE ! UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER is the only accepted recourse for KIEV ! Thank you NATO !! Proof > “We will not allow armed forces to exist in Ukraine that pose a long-term threat to Russia and its people” — Putin ➖If Ukraine does not reach an agreement with Russia in Istanbul now, the situation for them will change for the worse, "there is no need to drag it out." ➖ If we do not reach an agreement on Ukraine peacefully, we will achieve our goals militarily. ➖Russia did not start military actions in Ukraine, but is trying to end them. ➖Kiev itself started the war, using troops against the civilian population of Donbass. ➖ Meeting with Trump would be useful, but it should be prepared. ➖ Trump is a businessman, and this is a big plus: he “considers everything”, this also applies to steps towards Russia.
0:41

‼️🇷🇺 🇺🇦 BREAKING NEWS ! PUTIN has just declared that RUSSIA is GOING to take FULL CONTROL of all of UKRAINE ! UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER is the only accepted recourse for KIEV ! Thank you NATO !! Proof > “We will not allow armed forces to exist in Ukraine that pose a long-term threat to Russia and its people” — Putin ➖If Ukraine does not reach an agreement with Russia in Istanbul now, the situation for them will change for the worse, "there is no need to drag it out." ➖ If we do not reach an agreement on Ukraine peacefully, we will achieve our goals militarily. ➖Russia did not start military actions in Ukraine, but is trying to end them. ➖Kiev itself started the war, using troops against the civilian population of Donbass. ➖ Meeting with Trump would be useful, but it should be prepared. ➖ Trump is a businessman, and this is a big plus: he “considers everything”, this also applies to steps towards Russia.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

3,361,967 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🌍 THE WAR PUTIN IS USING TO BREAK EUROPE A leaked peace plan is circulating, but according to Serhii Plokhy, the truth is far more dangerous. He says Putin is not looking for peace. He is buying time, playing history, and pushing a slow, grinding war designed to break Ukraine and split the West. And the stakes are rising on every front. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin sees the war as an imperial restoration, not a negotiation •⁠ ⁠⁠Why slow Russian advances with massive losses still serve his strategy •⁠ ⁠⁠How sanctions strike hard but need time and discipline to cripple the Kremlin •⁠ ⁠⁠Why cracks inside the Western alliance are now Putin’s biggest weapon •⁠ ⁠⁠How Russia keeps its war machine running even as its economy strains •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Ukraine’s shift toward Europe triggered the conflict long before NATO mattered •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Russian drones, cyber attacks and provocations are pressure tests on NATO’s red lines •⁠ ⁠⁠How close the world actually came to nuclear escalation in 2022 •⁠ ⁠⁠And why the fate of this war will shape Europe’s borders for a generation His warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. And the window to contain this war is shrinking fast. If Ukraine collapses, he says Europe will face a far more aggressive Russia backed by a rising China. If Ukraine holds, the entire balance of power in the West will shift. This is one of the most consequential wars since 1945. And the next decisions will echo for decades. 01:49 – Initial reaction to the peace plan: back to square one 02:38 – Historian draws parallels to Korea and Vietnam peace talks 04:23 – Russia has incentives to keep fighting, not negotiate 04:55 – Russia using $30k bonuses to recruit new troops 06:28 – Cracks in the Western alliance while Russia holds economically 07:25 – Are new Lukoil and Rosneft sanctions strong enough 08:38 – Sanctions need time and pressure; only crisis shifts Putin 12:30 – Putin driven by legacy and restoring a Russian empire 14:24 – Multipolar vision requires Ukraine’s resources 16:24 – Real trigger was Ukraine’s 2014 EU Association Agreement 18:28 – Is bombing Ukraine counterproductive to bringing it closer 19:45 – Russia turned Chechnya from rebellion to loyal ally 21:29 – If Ukraine falls, its fighters could become Russian shock troops 24:34 – Putin genuinely believes his historical narrative 26:59 – NATO expansion a concern but not the core trigger 27:31 – West repeatedly said Ukraine had no future in NATO 30:22 – Russia provoking NATO because it knows NATO won’t respond 32:49 – Aid provision is a normal international practice 38:33 – 2008 Bucharest Summit was the real turning point 40:32 – NATO used as an excuse for deeper strategic motives 41:18 – Comparison to Cuba Missile Crisis: missiles near borders 43:13 – West refuses permanent troops in new NATO states 53:12 – NATO won’t be ready to confront Russia until 2029 57:04 – War ends with a sharper, more defiant line 58:31 – War created a stronger Ukrainian national identity 01:03:05 – Putin’s legacy now mixed with declining influence
1:04:40

🌍 THE WAR PUTIN IS USING TO BREAK EUROPE A leaked peace plan is circulating, but according to Serhii Plokhy, the truth is far more dangerous. He says Putin is not looking for peace. He is buying time, playing history, and pushing a slow, grinding war designed to break Ukraine and split the West. And the stakes are rising on every front. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Putin sees the war as an imperial restoration, not a negotiation •⁠ ⁠⁠Why slow Russian advances with massive losses still serve his strategy •⁠ ⁠⁠How sanctions strike hard but need time and discipline to cripple the Kremlin •⁠ ⁠⁠Why cracks inside the Western alliance are now Putin’s biggest weapon •⁠ ⁠⁠How Russia keeps its war machine running even as its economy strains •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Ukraine’s shift toward Europe triggered the conflict long before NATO mattered •⁠ ⁠⁠Why Russian drones, cyber attacks and provocations are pressure tests on NATO’s red lines •⁠ ⁠⁠How close the world actually came to nuclear escalation in 2022 •⁠ ⁠⁠And why the fate of this war will shape Europe’s borders for a generation His warning is blunt. Russia is not negotiating. Russia is maneuvering. And the window to contain this war is shrinking fast. If Ukraine collapses, he says Europe will face a far more aggressive Russia backed by a rising China. If Ukraine holds, the entire balance of power in the West will shift. This is one of the most consequential wars since 1945. And the next decisions will echo for decades. 01:49 – Initial reaction to the peace plan: back to square one 02:38 – Historian draws parallels to Korea and Vietnam peace talks 04:23 – Russia has incentives to keep fighting, not negotiate 04:55 – Russia using $30k bonuses to recruit new troops 06:28 – Cracks in the Western alliance while Russia holds economically 07:25 – Are new Lukoil and Rosneft sanctions strong enough 08:38 – Sanctions need time and pressure; only crisis shifts Putin 12:30 – Putin driven by legacy and restoring a Russian empire 14:24 – Multipolar vision requires Ukraine’s resources 16:24 – Real trigger was Ukraine’s 2014 EU Association Agreement 18:28 – Is bombing Ukraine counterproductive to bringing it closer 19:45 – Russia turned Chechnya from rebellion to loyal ally 21:29 – If Ukraine falls, its fighters could become Russian shock troops 24:34 – Putin genuinely believes his historical narrative 26:59 – NATO expansion a concern but not the core trigger 27:31 – West repeatedly said Ukraine had no future in NATO 30:22 – Russia provoking NATO because it knows NATO won’t respond 32:49 – Aid provision is a normal international practice 38:33 – 2008 Bucharest Summit was the real turning point 40:32 – NATO used as an excuse for deeper strategic motives 41:18 – Comparison to Cuba Missile Crisis: missiles near borders 43:13 – West refuses permanent troops in new NATO states 53:12 – NATO won’t be ready to confront Russia until 2029 57:04 – War ends with a sharper, more defiant line 58:31 – War created a stronger Ukrainian national identity 01:03:05 – Putin’s legacy now mixed with declining influence

Mario Nawfal

1,741,462 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨INTERVIEW: AARON MATE ON UKRAINE’S PEACE DEAL & VENEZUELA’S REGIME CHANGE Will Ukraine accept Trump’s peace deal? Do they have a choice? Aaron Maté argues Ukraine is running out of men, out of money, out of allies, and out of time, while war hawks fight to keep a losing war alive. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine is so desperate they are dragging young men off the streets to fill the front •⁠ ⁠Why desertion is skyrocketing even according to pro-Western think tanks •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s first peace plan terrified Washington •⁠ ⁠How the bipartisan war machine watered it down within hours •⁠ ⁠Why Russia has the manpower, territory and momentum to keep advancing •⁠ ⁠Why Minsk and Istanbul show peace was possible but intentionally blocked •⁠ ⁠How Europe is being humiliated, sidelined and forced to pay the bill •⁠ ⁠How Venezuela suddenly became the next potential intervention target Maté says the West is staring at a strategic disaster. Ukraine is collapsing. Russia is pushing forward. Europe is fracturing. And the political elite is clinging to a proxy war with no path to victory. If this continues, the fallout will not stop at Ukraine. The balance of global power is shifting in real time. 01:46 - Trump's 28-point peace plan meets Ukraine's 19-point counter-proposal 05:23 - For lasting peace, both sides need incentive to negotiate rather than keep fighting 06:02 - Ukraine struggling: running out of money, running out of men, losing global support 09:17 - Appeasing Putin like Hitler: giving up Donbas today means more invasions tomorrow 11:45 - Trump's carrot-stick strategy: flipped from criticizing Zelensky to threatening Putin 14:30 - Europe humiliated and sidelined: Macron contradicts peace plan on troop deployment 16:44 - Trump pushed back on Netanyahu in Middle East - could he break with allies on Ukraine? 19:16 - Will Ukraine accept giving up Donbas territory it's slowly losing anyway? 22:47 - U.S. mediating between NATO and Russia - signals decoupling from alliance? 29:54 - Ukraine gave up nukes for security guarantees Russia violated - why trust them now? 35:04 - Bizarre reconstruction deal: U.S. gets half of $100B Russian assets, Europe pays $100B more 38:55 - Europe forced to rearm as U.S. shows it won't always have their backs 40:06 - After massive military buildup in Venezuela, Trump's tough guy image makes backing down nearly impossible 46:23 – U.S. sanctions turn Venezuelans against their own government 50:16 - Only 34% of Venezuelans support U.S. intervention - pro-opposition 85% claim is pure propaganda 55:51 - Middle East reality check: Gaza ceasefire collapsing, Hezbollah won't disarm
59:36

🚨INTERVIEW: AARON MATE ON UKRAINE’S PEACE DEAL & VENEZUELA’S REGIME CHANGE Will Ukraine accept Trump’s peace deal? Do they have a choice? Aaron Maté argues Ukraine is running out of men, out of money, out of allies, and out of time, while war hawks fight to keep a losing war alive. We get into: •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine is so desperate they are dragging young men off the streets to fill the front •⁠ ⁠Why desertion is skyrocketing even according to pro-Western think tanks •⁠ ⁠Why Trump’s first peace plan terrified Washington •⁠ ⁠How the bipartisan war machine watered it down within hours •⁠ ⁠Why Russia has the manpower, territory and momentum to keep advancing •⁠ ⁠Why Minsk and Istanbul show peace was possible but intentionally blocked •⁠ ⁠How Europe is being humiliated, sidelined and forced to pay the bill •⁠ ⁠How Venezuela suddenly became the next potential intervention target Maté says the West is staring at a strategic disaster. Ukraine is collapsing. Russia is pushing forward. Europe is fracturing. And the political elite is clinging to a proxy war with no path to victory. If this continues, the fallout will not stop at Ukraine. The balance of global power is shifting in real time. 01:46 - Trump's 28-point peace plan meets Ukraine's 19-point counter-proposal 05:23 - For lasting peace, both sides need incentive to negotiate rather than keep fighting 06:02 - Ukraine struggling: running out of money, running out of men, losing global support 09:17 - Appeasing Putin like Hitler: giving up Donbas today means more invasions tomorrow 11:45 - Trump's carrot-stick strategy: flipped from criticizing Zelensky to threatening Putin 14:30 - Europe humiliated and sidelined: Macron contradicts peace plan on troop deployment 16:44 - Trump pushed back on Netanyahu in Middle East - could he break with allies on Ukraine? 19:16 - Will Ukraine accept giving up Donbas territory it's slowly losing anyway? 22:47 - U.S. mediating between NATO and Russia - signals decoupling from alliance? 29:54 - Ukraine gave up nukes for security guarantees Russia violated - why trust them now? 35:04 - Bizarre reconstruction deal: U.S. gets half of $100B Russian assets, Europe pays $100B more 38:55 - Europe forced to rearm as U.S. shows it won't always have their backs 40:06 - After massive military buildup in Venezuela, Trump's tough guy image makes backing down nearly impossible 46:23 – U.S. sanctions turn Venezuelans against their own government 50:16 - Only 34% of Venezuelans support U.S. intervention - pro-opposition 85% claim is pure propaganda 55:51 - Middle East reality check: Gaza ceasefire collapsing, Hezbollah won't disarm

Mario Nawfal

1,270,254 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "TRUMP WANTS THIS WAR TO END - BUT ONLY IF HE CAN LOOK GOOD DOING IT AND IF HE CAN PRESERVE MOSCOW'S REGIME" How much of Trump’s Ukraine stance is strategy, and how much is self-interest? Support for Ukraine under Trump is painted as conditional, inconsistent, and ultimately centered on personal image. "Trump has done nothing for Ukraine since coming to office. He withheld funding, paused arms shipments, delayed intelligence, and only relented under pressure. He wants the war to end, but he wants it to end in a way that reflects well on him. He doesn’t care about justice or restitution for Ukraine. He wants something he can pitch, and maybe win a little gold bauble, like a Nobel Prize. If this were a real proxy war under either Biden or Trump, Russia would’ve been defeated already. Both Biden and Trump seem more focused on preserving Moscow's regime than helping Ukraine win." Jonathan Fink 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 Silicon Curtain Podcast
4:45

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "TRUMP WANTS THIS WAR TO END - BUT ONLY IF HE CAN LOOK GOOD DOING IT AND IF HE CAN PRESERVE MOSCOW'S REGIME" How much of Trump’s Ukraine stance is strategy, and how much is self-interest? Support for Ukraine under Trump is painted as conditional, inconsistent, and ultimately centered on personal image. "Trump has done nothing for Ukraine since coming to office. He withheld funding, paused arms shipments, delayed intelligence, and only relented under pressure. He wants the war to end, but he wants it to end in a way that reflects well on him. He doesn’t care about justice or restitution for Ukraine. He wants something he can pitch, and maybe win a little gold bauble, like a Nobel Prize. If this were a real proxy war under either Biden or Trump, Russia would’ve been defeated already. Both Biden and Trump seem more focused on preserving Moscow's regime than helping Ukraine win." Jonathan Fink 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 Silicon Curtain Podcast

Mario Nawfal

40,511 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.
0:31

“Trump’s team wants to scrap it [Putin’s war against Ukraine ] from the agenda.” Lavrov. Lavrov is confirming what many have long feared: that the Trump presidency would serve Russian interests. “This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team, that does not reflect the philosophy of the incumbent US administration. I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda so as to eliminate obstacles for normal economic, technological and other relations. This will not be easy because the United States has a peculiar approach towards addressing and resolving economic issues.” Lavrov said. "This is an artificial war, launched by Joe Biden and his team..." This statement is a complete inversion of reality. A blatant and self-serving lie, repeated daily by Trump. Russia feels it can openly lie about the origins of the war because the U.S. President is not a reliable bulwark against Russian disinformation. Putin’s war is not "artificial" or a creation of the Biden administration. It is a full-scale, unprovoked invasion, killing thousands of Ukranians. Russia's actions are driven by its own imperial ambitions and its long-standing desire to subjugate Ukraine and undermine its sovereignty. Lavrov is essentially saying "the war is artificial because we want it to be over on our terms, and now we have a fool who agrees.” The war is a reflection of putin’s “philosophy”, not Biden's. This is the most revealing and chilling part of the statement. Lavrov is essentially giving a back-handed compliment to Trump, confirming that the "philosophy" of the current U.S. administration is to abandon Ukraine. Lavrov is celebrating the fact that the U.S. is no longer committed to the principles of a sovereign, independent Ukraine and is instead more aligned with Russia's view on Ukraine and Europe. Trump's "philosophy" is not about peace, but about appeasement and capitulation, driven by a personal disdain for previous U.S. policy and a fascination with authoritarian strongmen like putin, Xi and Kim Jong Un. "I believe this is exactly why Donald Trump’s team wants to scrap it from the agenda..." This is a direct admission of collusion. Lavrov openly stating that Russia and the U.S. are working together to end the war, but on Russia’s terms. "Scrapping it from the agenda" is a euphemism for forcing Ukraine to surrender territory, a position that would be an outrageous betrayal by Trump. Trump is not seeking a just peace, but rather a quick resolution that allows Russia to claim victory. It confirms that the primary obstacle to Russia's goals has been removed, and the path to a Russian-dictated peace is now open. It is not just propaganda; it is an open admission of a new strategic reality. It confirms that Russia has successfully exploited U.S. political divisions to find a partner in the White House, and that it now feels confident enough to publicly celebrate the unraveling of the West's collective front against Russian aggression.

Yasmina

228,695 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 “NATO is weak, cause it did not attack the Russian convoy” and “we’re working on the Georgian Maidan” 🗣️ Vovan and Lexus prank with Prank with Paul Massaro, senior policy advisor to the US commission on security and cooperation in Europe. Paul massaro says a lot of interesting things about the inner workings of US foreign policy: 0:23 What’s the mood in the US congress? Most senators don’t really care. The US president has the authority. 1:16 Every administration tries to make peace with Russia, but Russia is doing something bad to derail that. 2:08 Trump really believes Russia wants peace? Trump is NOT a Russia puppet, he is slightly Russia friendly, but he doesn’t know about Ukraine. Trump needs to give Ukraine everything and sanction Russia. But Trump just wants to end it and he doesn’t care how. 4:01 we want to focus on China, but Russia won’t let us. 4:23 “if Russia were defeated and humbled finally that would also let us focus on other pressing national security issues” 5:31 USAID and NED problems? They were productive in Ukraine and Georgia, but promoted too much woke ideology Maybe their shutdown was illegal, so the next president might bring them back. 7:21 What’s going on in Georgia? 7:57 Ukraine is the better Russia. “there's no place worse to be a Christian than Russia” 8:46 US needs to help Ukraine get closer to Turkey. Turkey is a counterweight to Russia. They’re willing to shoot down Russian jets. 9:13 NATO is a constraint on our actions 9:23 Russian opposition does not have the answer, you need defeat of Russia for change. The Russian identity as it's currently constituted is the problem. 10:09 Supporting Russian minorities is away to break up Russia 11:57 Ukraine will not join NATO? I mean Ukraine is already effectively a NATO state. But NATO is diminished itself because it did not bombed the Russian convoy driving to Kiev. But everything can be reversed again with the next president, so Ukraine may join NATO. 13:58 Poland and Ukraine will stop Russia from attacking Europe, not NATO. Poland understands it can’t rely on NATO. 14:35 What should Ukraine do? Hit oil, support separatists groups in Russia, get close to Turkey and Poland. 15:25 Im skeptical towards Germany and France. France is big words and nothing happens. 16:08 Maidan Coup in Georgia “were working very hard at this” 16:59 Olympic committee change policy towards Russia
18:53

🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦 “NATO is weak, cause it did not attack the Russian convoy” and “we’re working on the Georgian Maidan” 🗣️ Vovan and Lexus prank with Prank with Paul Massaro, senior policy advisor to the US commission on security and cooperation in Europe. Paul massaro says a lot of interesting things about the inner workings of US foreign policy: 0:23 What’s the mood in the US congress? Most senators don’t really care. The US president has the authority. 1:16 Every administration tries to make peace with Russia, but Russia is doing something bad to derail that. 2:08 Trump really believes Russia wants peace? Trump is NOT a Russia puppet, he is slightly Russia friendly, but he doesn’t know about Ukraine. Trump needs to give Ukraine everything and sanction Russia. But Trump just wants to end it and he doesn’t care how. 4:01 we want to focus on China, but Russia won’t let us. 4:23 “if Russia were defeated and humbled finally that would also let us focus on other pressing national security issues” 5:31 USAID and NED problems? They were productive in Ukraine and Georgia, but promoted too much woke ideology Maybe their shutdown was illegal, so the next president might bring them back. 7:21 What’s going on in Georgia? 7:57 Ukraine is the better Russia. “there's no place worse to be a Christian than Russia” 8:46 US needs to help Ukraine get closer to Turkey. Turkey is a counterweight to Russia. They’re willing to shoot down Russian jets. 9:13 NATO is a constraint on our actions 9:23 Russian opposition does not have the answer, you need defeat of Russia for change. The Russian identity as it's currently constituted is the problem. 10:09 Supporting Russian minorities is away to break up Russia 11:57 Ukraine will not join NATO? I mean Ukraine is already effectively a NATO state. But NATO is diminished itself because it did not bombed the Russian convoy driving to Kiev. But everything can be reversed again with the next president, so Ukraine may join NATO. 13:58 Poland and Ukraine will stop Russia from attacking Europe, not NATO. Poland understands it can’t rely on NATO. 14:35 What should Ukraine do? Hit oil, support separatists groups in Russia, get close to Turkey and Poland. 15:25 Im skeptical towards Germany and France. France is big words and nothing happens. 16:08 Maidan Coup in Georgia “were working very hard at this” 16:59 Olympic committee change policy towards Russia

Lord Bebo

66,053 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "RUSSIA IS USING HUMAN LIVES AND ITS WAR MACHINE" Russia keeps trying to turn every hard moment on the battlefield into a big dramatic storyline, and Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says it is all aimed at one audience. She believes the Kremlin is using these narratives to influence the American government and to exploit the idea that Trump wants to end the war quickly. According to Stefanishyna, Russia is framing places like Pokrovsk as huge turning points even though Ukraine faces dozens of intense combat zones every week. She says it is a performance meant to look like strength while hiding what she describes as military exhaustion and desperation. At the same time, Stefanishyna argues that a ceasefire will eventually come, but the real question is who decides the price of that deal: Ukraine or outside powers like the U.S. "Russia builds a narrative around Pokrovsk as the battle of battles to pretend they are succeeding. They are trying to speculate with the intention of Trump to end the war. They are using human lives and their war machine. Every war ends with a deal, but the price of that deal will be decided not only in Ukraine but also here in the U.S."
3:32

🇷🇺🇺🇦 "RUSSIA IS USING HUMAN LIVES AND ITS WAR MACHINE" Russia keeps trying to turn every hard moment on the battlefield into a big dramatic storyline, and Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says it is all aimed at one audience. She believes the Kremlin is using these narratives to influence the American government and to exploit the idea that Trump wants to end the war quickly. According to Stefanishyna, Russia is framing places like Pokrovsk as huge turning points even though Ukraine faces dozens of intense combat zones every week. She says it is a performance meant to look like strength while hiding what she describes as military exhaustion and desperation. At the same time, Stefanishyna argues that a ceasefire will eventually come, but the real question is who decides the price of that deal: Ukraine or outside powers like the U.S. "Russia builds a narrative around Pokrovsk as the battle of battles to pretend they are succeeding. They are trying to speculate with the intention of Trump to end the war. They are using human lives and their war machine. Every war ends with a deal, but the price of that deal will be decided not only in Ukraine but also here in the U.S."

Mario Nawfal

17,238 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Armstrong opened the conversation with a blunt take. If he were in Putin’s position, he said, he wouldn’t agree to any peace deal. Because in his view, Europe has already declared war, just without saying it out loud. Poland is training its citizens for combat. Germany is calling up men as old as 60. And, as Armstrong put it, “Europe knows it’s in trouble and instead of reforming, they need an external enemy.” That enemy, he said, is Putin. He criticized European leaders for escalating the conflict while pretending to seek peace, and said China isn’t fooled. “This is a war against NATO,” he said. The media may claim it’s still just Ukraine vs. Russia, but Armstrong believes the global fault lines have already shifted. “Why would you agree to a peace deal when every European country is against you?” he asked. “China… knows this is not a war with Ukraine anymore. This is a war against NATO.”
2:47

Armstrong opened the conversation with a blunt take. If he were in Putin’s position, he said, he wouldn’t agree to any peace deal. Because in his view, Europe has already declared war, just without saying it out loud. Poland is training its citizens for combat. Germany is calling up men as old as 60. And, as Armstrong put it, “Europe knows it’s in trouble and instead of reforming, they need an external enemy.” That enemy, he said, is Putin. He criticized European leaders for escalating the conflict while pretending to seek peace, and said China isn’t fooled. “This is a war against NATO,” he said. The media may claim it’s still just Ukraine vs. Russia, but Armstrong believes the global fault lines have already shifted. “Why would you agree to a peace deal when every European country is against you?” he asked. “China… knows this is not a war with Ukraine anymore. This is a war against NATO.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

104,676 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support
1:06:33

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

Mario Nawfal

1,828,232 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten