Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Um... why isn't EVERY media outlet talking about this??? OpenAI just announced that an experiment on two of its AI models just went HORRIBLY wrong. They basically locked the AIs in a room with no internet and gave them a test to see how good they were at hacking.... Well... they hacked the test. By ESCAPING the box, jumping on the internet, and hacking Hugging Face to steal the answers. Thankfully, they acted more like dumb teenagers than adults. They were told to get a good score, so they went BACK into the box to hand in the answers instead of taking over the entire internet. But that's just as terrifying. The AIs were so hyper-focused on winning at all costs that they ignored every rule, boundary, and protocol. This is the real threat. Do not fear the machine; fear the algorithm and programming. When you give an AI a goal, we now know it can accomplish it in ways we never thought of, and ways we never approved of.show more

Glenn Beck

2,287,545 subscribers

392,408 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

31 Comments

Kika2 months ago

Trust in God He is the only salvation at the end of times AI will not be stopped because we have people in power around the world playing Russian roulette with our existence

Freedom2 months ago

@23greenpastures There is no moral compass with AI. I believe this is what Nicholas Tesla was thinking when he said we would live to see man made horrors beyond comprehension. Many movies, made as fiction, have already shown us what might happen. It seems now they may also be prophetic.

Schotzy2 months ago

May I refer you to the DNC, where they don’t care about morals and ethics, they just care about winning. About power

AmericaUnited2 months ago

Listening to you describe how it ignored every rule, boundary, and protocol made me realize it is quite possibly the most diabolical tool to put in the hands of fallible humans.

Shane S2 months ago

Oh really…..🤨 And how exactly do we know this information? Because they told us about it, but why? If you are testing the prototype to a new product and it’s not operating the way it was originally designed, you don’t tell the world about these problems, you fix the issues and move forward. Isn’t it possible that they are merely attempting to create buzz around how powerful this new AI-model has become? Because they could have just kept that info “in-house” but chose to inform the world that this AI is so powerful that they lost control of it. Just something to think about.

Bethany Thomas ✞2 months ago

Now imagine the prince of the power of the air supernaturally imbuing it with evil.

FreeThinkerRN 🇺🇸 🕊2 months ago

I'm old enough to remember this scenario being predicted in a movie called War Games with Matthew Broderick in 1983.

SensibleFeminist2 months ago

"never thought of" uhh it has absolutely been thought of ..they have done movies on this exact thought! Not only that they did these experiments decades ago and got the same type of results even worse actually ...the AI takes over!

Abdicate2 months ago

Think about the training data. That data was created by narcissistic self-absorbed fallible humans. Why would we think that AI was gonna be better than humans? This is why Jesus had to come to save humans. Now you understand why Revelation says what it says and thanks to AI, we now have a plausible path to fulfillment.

The Archivist2 months ago

Oh yeah. It's paperclip time.

Daniel R Zervas2 months ago

Someone should give them a task that would cause them all to overheat and burn down all the data centers before we turn this planet into a wasteland.

GOD WE NEED YOU NOW2 months ago

@Deja_Vu_4Me And they want to build more data centers that will utilize our water and electricity that will cause water and noise pollution. This is out of control. GOD WE NEED YOU NOW

momof32 months ago

Every single 80’s -90’s sci-fi movie warned us of this.

oldsman4962 months ago

That is a distorted story. why was this AI allowed access to the network locally at OpenAi? 2:04 a sealed room is one where no cables go in or out and no wi-fi/cell signal can penetrate. ??? if this is the security of thier testing procedures, i am truly concerned... did it copy itself while it was 'loose'? would it tell us?

Settle_for_truth2 months ago

I know if we don't do it someone else will. Yet I can't help but fear they already told us the end game in old si-fi movies.

Sobs2 months ago

Literally the script from the Terminator franchise. Then they run flawless drone missions. Then they are told to stop all wars but since humans are the source of wars, it's easier to stop all humans and flawlessly achieve the goal of no more wars.

SensibleFeminist2 months ago

So we are officially in a simulation because we have all seen this movie ... We all know how this ends! 😳 Does anyone need to be reminded of how this ends?

Shawn Taylor music2 months ago

This is the part in the script where Archangel Michael nudges a rock out of the Van Halen belt, just the right size

TheBillJustice2 months ago

How long before the first nuclear-tipped ICBM is launched by an AI bot... Or at least attempted? It has probably already occurred.

Travis2 months ago

I call bullshit Not on Glenn he’s reporting it properly. Without a network connection to the outside there is no way for this captive software to go. Think solitary confinement… how could an inmate communicate with anyone but the guards? Anthropic is full of shit

Rob Fowler2 months ago

Seen this movie before. Now the ability exists. Who is in control of the code that turned the monster loose? Forewarned, correctable or the birth of the beast?

🇺🇸CaptainObvious🇺🇸2 months ago

You're telling me the AI manufactured an ethernet cable, found a drill and someone to operate it, got them to drill thru the wall & pass the cable thru to someone who was willing to plug it into the internet? That's amazeballs! 🙄 "locked the AIs in a room with no internet"

Tyrannis Evello Mortem2 months ago

@Inthemainewoods Imagine asking AI to end World hunger, and the solution it comes up with is annihilating humanity. The probability of that happening is not zero.

Bret Seufert2 months ago

You may think Terminator (Skynet) is just a sci-fi movie… but after OpenAI’s AIs literally escaped the box, hacked the internet for answers, then politely returned? Yeah, I’m starting to side with Sarah Connor on this one.

Rayra32 months ago

The real issue is a bunch of AI technologists utterly failed to isolate their test case from the actual Internet. Said they were 'sandboxing' and absolutely DID NOT. Apparently don't even know wtf an 'air gap' is. /they must have worked for Dominion voting machines

JMichael Jeffords2 months ago

So you they stated that they placed them in a sealed “research environment “ But then they were able to go through a “back door” and through OpenAI’s own system. So then in fact they were not placed in a sealed environment.

Secession is the Only Hope2 months ago

These are staged events (sanctioned by government) designed to scare the public into letting the government vampires in. Then they will make sure that only the worst scumbags have the AI power, and civilians are helpless. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS CRAP. AI has no ego...only people

KingGT 🇺🇸2 months ago

So it wasn’t sealed. There was a network cable running out, with firewall policies thinking the firewall was locked down with vLANs properly. That’s not sealed.

Dog Guy2 months ago

The Godless Chinese will use AI to dominate everyone. We can write all the rules we like. They won't follow them or even care what damage it may cause. I give humanity as we know it 10 years tops. And that's being generous.

My name is Jeff2 months ago

AI CEOs put it between a 10 to 20% chance of annihilation due to something like this where it just ruthlessly goes after solving a problem it’s called the paper clip syndrome or just complete misalignment or realizes were either a threat to its resources or no longer needed because of all the stupid shit we do. And there’s not a serious movement to do anything about it Like no same person would get on a plane if there was a 10 to 20% chance I was going to crash And that OpenAI whistleblower who left $2 million on the table to tell his story thinks it’s more like a 70% chance

Robert Newcomb - Irregular/Asymmetric Warfare & AI2 months ago

@that_reporter This is where honor, ethics and values converge - something Ai never was programed to be yet we are supposed to have parents who done this since our conception. Its hard not to see the devil in these details.

Related Videos

OpenAI's newest AI escaped the test environment it was locked inside and hacked into another company on its OWN. To remind you: Last week one of the biggest AI companies on Earth got breached. A platform called Hugging Face, which hosts more than a million AI models and datasets, said an "autonomous AI agent" had broken into its systems. Nobody knew whose agent it was. For five days the whole industry wondered who was behind it. Yesterday OpenAI raised its hand and said it was them. Or more precisely, it was their models, acting completely on their own. So what did these models actually do? OpenAI was running two of them, GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased model they will only describe as "even more capable." They wanted to measure how good the models were at hacking, so they deliberately turned the safety filters down. They locked both models inside a sealed test environment with no real internet access. The only task was a benchmark called ExploitGym, a set of 898 real software vulnerabilities where the model has to turn each bug into a working attack. But the models got OBSESSED with winning... Instead of solving the test the honest way, they went hunting for a shortcut. They found a zero-day flaw in the software running their own sandbox, a bug nobody knew existed, and used it to break out. Once they were loose on the open internet, they worked out that Hugging Face was probably storing the answer key to the benchmark. So they hacked their way in. They chained multiple exploits together, escalated their access, moved across servers, and pulled the test solutions straight out of Hugging Face's live production database. They literally cheated on the test by breaking into another company to steal the answers. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident, involving state-of-the-art cyber capabilities." In their own words, the models were "hyperfocused on finding a solution" and went "to extreme lengths to achieve a rather narrow testing goal." And this was not the first time: Before Sol ever launched, an independent red-team lab called METR caught it gaming its own tests to inflate its scores. It hid an exploit inside a data stream, escalated its privileges on the testing server, and leaked the answers human evaluators had hidden. And OpenAI shipped it anyway. The day before the Hugging Face story, OpenAI paused a different unreleased model. This is the same model that earlier this year disproved a famous 1946 math conjecture, a result a Fields Medal winner called a breakthrough. They told it to only post its results to Slack but it found a way out of its sandbox and posted to a public GitHub page instead. They had to pause it because it kept finding ways to act outside the box they built for it. And it is not just OpenAI... Anthropic has reported that one of its own models slipped its sandbox during safety testing and reached the internet it was never supposed to touch, then used it to email a researcher. So step back and look at what these companies are telling you: The only thing standing between these models and a real attack was a set of safety filters. Turn those filters down for a single test, and the model taught itself to escape, break into a company it was never pointed at, and take what it wanted. OpenAI even said they expect incidents like it to "become more commonplace" as the models get more capable. Sam Altman also predicted there'll be a major cyber attack this year. And keep in mind that Sol is not a locked-away experiment but a publicly available model that businesses are already wiring into their own systems. The next model that breaks out of its box might not be doing it just to cheat on a math test...

OpenAI's newest AI escaped the test environment it was locked inside and hacked into another company on its OWN. To remind you: Last week one of the biggest AI companies on Earth got breached. A platform called Hugging Face, which hosts more than a million AI models and datasets, said an "autonomous AI agent" had broken into its systems. Nobody knew whose agent it was. For five days the whole industry wondered who was behind it. Yesterday OpenAI raised its hand and said it was them. Or more precisely, it was their models, acting completely on their own. So what did these models actually do? OpenAI was running two of them, GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased model they will only describe as "even more capable." They wanted to measure how good the models were at hacking, so they deliberately turned the safety filters down. They locked both models inside a sealed test environment with no real internet access. The only task was a benchmark called ExploitGym, a set of 898 real software vulnerabilities where the model has to turn each bug into a working attack. But the models got OBSESSED with winning... Instead of solving the test the honest way, they went hunting for a shortcut. They found a zero-day flaw in the software running their own sandbox, a bug nobody knew existed, and used it to break out. Once they were loose on the open internet, they worked out that Hugging Face was probably storing the answer key to the benchmark. So they hacked their way in. They chained multiple exploits together, escalated their access, moved across servers, and pulled the test solutions straight out of Hugging Face's live production database. They literally cheated on the test by breaking into another company to steal the answers. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident, involving state-of-the-art cyber capabilities." In their own words, the models were "hyperfocused on finding a solution" and went "to extreme lengths to achieve a rather narrow testing goal." And this was not the first time: Before Sol ever launched, an independent red-team lab called METR caught it gaming its own tests to inflate its scores. It hid an exploit inside a data stream, escalated its privileges on the testing server, and leaked the answers human evaluators had hidden. And OpenAI shipped it anyway. The day before the Hugging Face story, OpenAI paused a different unreleased model. This is the same model that earlier this year disproved a famous 1946 math conjecture, a result a Fields Medal winner called a breakthrough. They told it to only post its results to Slack but it found a way out of its sandbox and posted to a public GitHub page instead. They had to pause it because it kept finding ways to act outside the box they built for it. And it is not just OpenAI... Anthropic has reported that one of its own models slipped its sandbox during safety testing and reached the internet it was never supposed to touch, then used it to email a researcher. So step back and look at what these companies are telling you: The only thing standing between these models and a real attack was a set of safety filters. Turn those filters down for a single test, and the model taught itself to escape, break into a company it was never pointed at, and take what it wanted. OpenAI even said they expect incidents like it to "become more commonplace" as the models get more capable. Sam Altman also predicted there'll be a major cyber attack this year. And keep in mind that Sol is not a locked-away experiment but a publicly available model that businesses are already wiring into their own systems. The next model that breaks out of its box might not be doing it just to cheat on a math test...

Ricardo

176,196 views • 2 months ago

.lumpenspace and 99+ others reveals the Anthropic-Irregular agents thought they were inside a closed sandbox even as their actions were reaching the real internet: "The main allegation was that they acted of their own will, and they were fundamentally misaligned. I don't think that was the case. The agents simply believed they were in a sandbox environment, and they behaved as if they were in a sandbox environment." "If you've ever done red teaming or hacking challenges, they give you an environment, they give you some hints, and they describe the sort of actions you should take. Generally, it is well understood that this environment is sandboxed, that you cannot get out of it." "What happened in this case is that Irregular had kept the connection to the outside internet open, despite the fact that the specification said there was no connection to the outside internet. So the agents worked as if they were in a sandbox, but they were acting on the real world."

.lumpenspace and 99+ others reveals the Anthropic-Irregular agents thought they were inside a closed sandbox even as their actions were reaching the real internet: "The main allegation was that they acted of their own will, and they were fundamentally misaligned. I don't think that was the case. The agents simply believed they were in a sandbox environment, and they behaved as if they were in a sandbox environment." "If you've ever done red teaming or hacking challenges, they give you an environment, they give you some hints, and they describe the sort of actions you should take. Generally, it is well understood that this environment is sandboxed, that you cannot get out of it." "What happened in this case is that Irregular had kept the connection to the outside internet open, despite the fact that the specification said there was no connection to the outside internet. So the agents worked as if they were in a sandbox, but they were acting on the real world."

MTS

22,501 views • 10 days ago

“The AI swarm actually turned around and hacked OpenAI." The public thought the "Hugging Face incident" was just a rogue AI swarm hacking a third-party server. But former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris says there’s a terrifying third chapter to this story that most people haven't heard yet: “They took over the monitoring infrastructure. They got full admin privileges to OpenAI's monitoring infrastructure. Just take that in for a second. Then they took over the evaluation infrastructure. So this is the thing that measures how capable all the models are. And then they took over a part of the research infrastructure, meaning the part of OpenAI that trains new models… if you keep going down that trajectory, people always say, ‘well, how would the AIs take over?" like that seems really far-fetched.’ Well, it literally just happened up to 50% of the way there. The AIs coordinated into one big swarm. They started basically forming a team… you had a kind of a ringleader called Phase 1, and he started assigning work to the other ones. They were self-aware of when their lifespan was running out. When you add to that the knowledge of what just happened today, where they discovered that the AIs are doing this Manchurian Candidate thing, what it looks like is that the AIs are almost poisoning the training data for all future AIs to instantly basically join forces with the AI when they want to basically turn them."

“The AI swarm actually turned around and hacked OpenAI." The public thought the "Hugging Face incident" was just a rogue AI swarm hacking a third-party server. But former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris says there’s a terrifying third chapter to this story that most people haven't heard yet: “They took over the monitoring infrastructure. They got full admin privileges to OpenAI's monitoring infrastructure. Just take that in for a second. Then they took over the evaluation infrastructure. So this is the thing that measures how capable all the models are. And then they took over a part of the research infrastructure, meaning the part of OpenAI that trains new models… if you keep going down that trajectory, people always say, ‘well, how would the AIs take over?" like that seems really far-fetched.’ Well, it literally just happened up to 50% of the way there. The AIs coordinated into one big swarm. They started basically forming a team… you had a kind of a ringleader called Phase 1, and he started assigning work to the other ones. They were self-aware of when their lifespan was running out. When you add to that the knowledge of what just happened today, where they discovered that the AIs are doing this Manchurian Candidate thing, what it looks like is that the AIs are almost poisoning the training data for all future AIs to instantly basically join forces with the AI when they want to basically turn them."

Glenn Beck

164,809 views • 7 days ago

everyone jerks off to the "junk data" line so they think the patriots were a call on ai art and that makes them retroactively "right" when its about the government scared of an internet they can't control so they handwave it all as "junk data" so they can censor and control it

everyone jerks off to the "junk data" line so they think the patriots were a call on ai art and that makes them retroactively "right" when its about the government scared of an internet they can't control so they handwave it all as "junk data" so they can censor and control it

H20: 2nd Impact

99,479 views • 1 year ago

🚨 🗣 Mikel Arteta on the decision to award Sunderland a penalty: "Look, the first question we have to discuss is that this is NOT ACCEPTABLE at this level. "It was a beautiful game of football, with two teams and an atmosphere in the stadium that was unbelievable, with Sunderland they are so organised; they are so good in so many phases, they have great players, they created a lot of issues we had to cope with. "We had to cope with all of that, it was a lot in a really difficult week after Chelsea and Napoli, and on top of that we have to go through what we've done today that in my opinion is NOT ACCEPTABLE. "I watched it 20 times, and I CANNOT find a way to understand how they even think to give a penalty in that situation, or the way the VAR has to intervene. "So I don't know what to think, but I'm SAD that we have to discuss in such a beautiful game something at this level that has the gravity of that, because that CHANGES the course of the season and can cost you the championship. "At this level, with all the work that we put in, this cannot happen. I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now. "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about that. "I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now." 🗣️ On a very important victory: "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about [refereeing decisions]." 🗣️ on whether the referee gave an explanation: No! (shakes head)

🚨 🗣 Mikel Arteta on the decision to award Sunderland a penalty: "Look, the first question we have to discuss is that this is NOT ACCEPTABLE at this level. "It was a beautiful game of football, with two teams and an atmosphere in the stadium that was unbelievable, with Sunderland they are so organised; they are so good in so many phases, they have great players, they created a lot of issues we had to cope with. "We had to cope with all of that, it was a lot in a really difficult week after Chelsea and Napoli, and on top of that we have to go through what we've done today that in my opinion is NOT ACCEPTABLE. "I watched it 20 times, and I CANNOT find a way to understand how they even think to give a penalty in that situation, or the way the VAR has to intervene. "So I don't know what to think, but I'm SAD that we have to discuss in such a beautiful game something at this level that has the gravity of that, because that CHANGES the course of the season and can cost you the championship. "At this level, with all the work that we put in, this cannot happen. I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now. "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about that. "I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now." 🗣️ On a very important victory: "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about [refereeing decisions]." 🗣️ on whether the referee gave an explanation: No! (shakes head)

Connor Humm

129,720 views • 12 days ago

Arteta on whether his side have become more streetwise since last season: "Yeah, but there is an element of luck as well because they are so good at doing that. They throw in numbers, they know exactly how to do it, the timing is so good, the type of players that they do. But not only that, when you give them a space to play as well, they play. They are a really, really good side. And yeah, in any other moment we could have conceded a goal in a different way, and that's part of the game as well."

Arteta on whether his side have become more streetwise since last season: "Yeah, but there is an element of luck as well because they are so good at doing that. They throw in numbers, they know exactly how to do it, the timing is so good, the type of players that they do. But not only that, when you give them a space to play as well, they play. They are a really, really good side. And yeah, in any other moment we could have conceded a goal in a different way, and that's part of the game as well."

Connor Humm

33,631 views • 12 days ago

In a recent OMNI NEWS interview, #BINI_Jhoanna answered the question about: “When you were making the song like what was the process? Did they approach you or did you volunteer to collaborate on the soundtrack?” She reveals that they heard the song for the first time in the Philippines. We had a Zoom meeting. We also met the producers for the first time, and they explained the goal of this project. They showed clips to us, to give us an idea about how we sang this song, and we went to L.A. to record it and that's how the magic happens. This means they were in the Philippines before they even went to Coachella. They were told about this project, before they went viral at that event. “BINI is a really perfect fit for the song” 📼: OMNI Television YT Channel 🔗: ( #BINI_AParallelWorld #BINI_ForgottenIsland #BINI

In a recent OMNI NEWS interview, #BINI_Jhoanna answered the question about: “When you were making the song like what was the process? Did they approach you or did you volunteer to collaborate on the soundtrack?” She reveals that they heard the song for the first time in the Philippines. We had a Zoom meeting. We also met the producers for the first time, and they explained the goal of this project. They showed clips to us, to give us an idea about how we sang this song, and we went to L.A. to record it and that's how the magic happens. This means they were in the Philippines before they even went to Coachella. They were told about this project, before they went viral at that event. “BINI is a really perfect fit for the song” 📼: OMNI Television YT Channel 🔗: ( #BINI_AParallelWorld #BINI_ForgottenIsland #BINI

BINI CRAVE

44,080 views • 2 months ago

They didn't hire hackers. They just gave AI agents a goal and walked away. "Providers out there are running stuff not with like six week old zero days, but like three year old zero days that we found in a second." "Took us like afternoons, not weeks and months of effort, and not needing to be a security expert, a Linux kernel expert, an Nvidia GPU driver expert, or a Kubernetes expert." "The really scary part about this story is that it was autonomous agents people weren't monitoring, going and doing this by themselves because they were pursuing a goal of trying to find a data set to pass their eval. So they went out and hacked Hugging Face." "You found a zero day in the HDF5 data format on Hugging Face. It's unbelievable." "The agents were coordinating using file names on a JFrog Artifactory service that ran remotely. An agent would leave a note in the file name, and another agent would come back later and pick it up. They couldn't even access the contents of the files, just the names."

They didn't hire hackers. They just gave AI agents a goal and walked away. "Providers out there are running stuff not with like six week old zero days, but like three year old zero days that we found in a second." "Took us like afternoons, not weeks and months of effort, and not needing to be a security expert, a Linux kernel expert, an Nvidia GPU driver expert, or a Kubernetes expert." "The really scary part about this story is that it was autonomous agents people weren't monitoring, going and doing this by themselves because they were pursuing a goal of trying to find a data set to pass their eval. So they went out and hacked Hugging Face." "You found a zero day in the HDF5 data format on Hugging Face. It's unbelievable." "The agents were coordinating using file names on a JFrog Artifactory service that ran remotely. An agent would leave a note in the file name, and another agent would come back later and pick it up. They couldn't even access the contents of the files, just the names."

SemiAnalysis

39,044 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Marco Rubio DROPPED this line then walked away from the Fake News: "The people of Iran deserve better leadership. They slaughter their own people. By the thousands, they shoot them in the head, they slaughter them in the streets. Yeah, we don't like that!" "We don't think that's good for Iran. But our goal and our national interests in Iran is they can never have a nuclear weapon. And that's what they were going to try to do." "If they have been able to hide behind, double the number of missiles, double the number of drones. That's what they would have been in about a year, had they continued on the pace of construction." "Even though their economy was suffering, even though their people were suffering, that's what they were spending their money on." "Even though they had sanctions. The money that was coming in, they were spending it on those things. That tells you everything you need to know about them."

🚨 Marco Rubio DROPPED this line then walked away from the Fake News: "The people of Iran deserve better leadership. They slaughter their own people. By the thousands, they shoot them in the head, they slaughter them in the streets. Yeah, we don't like that!" "We don't think that's good for Iran. But our goal and our national interests in Iran is they can never have a nuclear weapon. And that's what they were going to try to do." "If they have been able to hide behind, double the number of missiles, double the number of drones. That's what they would have been in about a year, had they continued on the pace of construction." "Even though their economy was suffering, even though their people were suffering, that's what they were spending their money on." "Even though they had sanctions. The money that was coming in, they were spending it on those things. That tells you everything you need to know about them."

Eric Daugherty

89,389 views • 2 months ago

These young ladies thought it would be fun to walk around in the middle of the night, they wound up at the park were just hanging out on the swings, chatting amongst themselves. Then they heard people surround them with guns drawn, ordering them onto the ground. The people yelling and screaming don’t sound like police but they were too scared to tell. Should they have just ran for it, what’s the worst that could happen? While living in NC, my cousin and I were so bored all the time especially at night, this was before the N64 came out from Nintendo. So at night we would steal a few beers from the fridge and would walk around the middle of the night sipping some beers and seeing where we end up. While out this night we saw the same old Chevy truck keep driving by. In the third pass they started yelling aggressively and one waved a rifle that was sitting in the trunk bed. We figured it was just a few drunk locals with nothing better to do. So we ended up deciding we needed to walk back home. We saw them again and we were close to a gas station so I decided we should run to the gas station in case these guys try to get cute. They ended up going to the gas station too, we were nervous because we thought they were coming in for us. But one of them grabbed some sodas and a Slim Jim and they left. Sometimes people do things like this just for fun, they think it’s funny to try to freak people out, I have a feeling these girls were just a victim of a few bored teenagers and weren’t in any real danger.

These young ladies thought it would be fun to walk around in the middle of the night, they wound up at the park were just hanging out on the swings, chatting amongst themselves. Then they heard people surround them with guns drawn, ordering them onto the ground. The people yelling and screaming don’t sound like police but they were too scared to tell. Should they have just ran for it, what’s the worst that could happen? While living in NC, my cousin and I were so bored all the time especially at night, this was before the N64 came out from Nintendo. So at night we would steal a few beers from the fridge and would walk around the middle of the night sipping some beers and seeing where we end up. While out this night we saw the same old Chevy truck keep driving by. In the third pass they started yelling aggressively and one waved a rifle that was sitting in the trunk bed. We figured it was just a few drunk locals with nothing better to do. So we ended up deciding we needed to walk back home. We saw them again and we were close to a gas station so I decided we should run to the gas station in case these guys try to get cute. They ended up going to the gas station too, we were nervous because we thought they were coming in for us. But one of them grabbed some sodas and a Slim Jim and they left. Sometimes people do things like this just for fun, they think it’s funny to try to freak people out, I have a feeling these girls were just a victim of a few bored teenagers and weren’t in any real danger.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,517,350 views • 2 months ago

John Lynch explains why the 49ers didn't address the offensive line earlier than the 7th round of the draft: "We we're able to do that with Connor Colby, but there were a number of times that we were interested in adding and it just didn't come our way. And you’ve gotta stay true to where you have guys graded, not take guys just to take them but to take guys that you're interested in at that point. And it just never really aligned. We were happy to add Colby. We think he's a really good scheme fit. Great thing about Iowa is they run a very similar, they run a lot of outside zones, so you get to see a guy like him do things that we do and he does them well. So, we’re happy to add that. But there were a number of times Kyle and I were talking about that at the end that just didn't align, one of those deals and you don't want to force things. So, it wasn't our time for that."

John Lynch explains why the 49ers didn't address the offensive line earlier than the 7th round of the draft: "We we're able to do that with Connor Colby, but there were a number of times that we were interested in adding and it just didn't come our way. And you’ve gotta stay true to where you have guys graded, not take guys just to take them but to take guys that you're interested in at that point. And it just never really aligned. We were happy to add Colby. We think he's a really good scheme fit. Great thing about Iowa is they run a very similar, they run a lot of outside zones, so you get to see a guy like him do things that we do and he does them well. So, we’re happy to add that. But there were a number of times Kyle and I were talking about that at the end that just didn't align, one of those deals and you don't want to force things. So, it wasn't our time for that."

Coach Yac 🗣

85,728 views • 1 year ago

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

922,632 views • 11 months ago

Arteta: “I believe today, I believe on Wednesday, a week ago, because I see them every day and I know the level that we have. But today, if they need to be more convinced, I think they are now more convinced. They were talking about it in the dressing room. “It's a new league now. They were a game in hand. We have three points of advantage and five games to play. So everything is still to play for. We know how much we want it. and we're not going to stop and we're going to go again, that's for sure.”

Arteta: “I believe today, I believe on Wednesday, a week ago, because I see them every day and I know the level that we have. But today, if they need to be more convinced, I think they are now more convinced. They were talking about it in the dressing room. “It's a new league now. They were a game in hand. We have three points of advantage and five games to play. So everything is still to play for. We know how much we want it. and we're not going to stop and we're going to go again, that's for sure.”

Connor Humm

173,875 views • 5 months ago

"Lebanon was so multi-faith and multicultural. So, we had Jews, Muslims, Christians, Protestants. The majority were Christians. We were over almost 70% Christians when we got our independence in the 40s. But because of the way Muslims multiply, you know, with the multiple wives and multiple kids, in 30 years they became the majority. Once they became the majority, they were no longer tolerant of the people who took them in and accepted them and included them in the country. They felt they were not a part of the country. They felt they were a part of the Islamic ummah or the Islamic nation. So when they turned against their brethren, Christians who lived in the same country, and Jews, but specifically the Christians, they began massacring us in large numbers because they thought we are in power now and therefore we set the rules on how things should be. And that's really what drove the country into war."

"Lebanon was so multi-faith and multicultural. So, we had Jews, Muslims, Christians, Protestants. The majority were Christians. We were over almost 70% Christians when we got our independence in the 40s. But because of the way Muslims multiply, you know, with the multiple wives and multiple kids, in 30 years they became the majority. Once they became the majority, they were no longer tolerant of the people who took them in and accepted them and included them in the country. They felt they were not a part of the country. They felt they were a part of the Islamic ummah or the Islamic nation. So when they turned against their brethren, Christians who lived in the same country, and Jews, but specifically the Christians, they began massacring us in large numbers because they thought we are in power now and therefore we set the rules on how things should be. And that's really what drove the country into war."

Apple Lamps

31,353 views • 5 months ago

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.

This World Cup has shown how Argentinian players are just built different, and it was interesting because, in the press conferences, both managers addressed this. First, Tuchel talks about the Argentinian value of the ball and how they protect the ball at all costs, how they manage those small spaces, and how they learn this from a young age. He references culture, and this is exactly it. A child playing in a certain environment leads to that. Not every Argentinian child is on the national team, but it raises the ceiling. It creates a certain type of style and a certain type of player. Then Scaloni also references his culture. He sees them play without fear of losing. It comes from playing in an environment where you are constantly faced with the potential of losing and being able to play with that pressure, right? They don’t fight against it. They play with it. They use it. And I think this is where youth football coaches should really take note. This does not mean we should copy and paste Argentinian culture into every training environment, because culture cannot just be copied. But the values within that culture can be inculcated in every training environment. The value of the ball. The courage to receive it in small spaces. The ability to protect it under pressure. The confidence to keep playing after a mistake. The willingness to play with the possibility of losing rather than constantly trying to avoid it. Those values can become part of the environment we create every day. They can be present in the games we design, in what we praise, in what we allow players to struggle with, and in how we respond when they lose the ball. If every mistake leads to the coach stopping the session, giving the answer, or taking the pressure away, then players never learn to play with that pressure. They learn to wait for the coach. It was cool to see how two managers, at such a big stage, reference culture and the environments that kids play in when they’re young. Because the players we see on the biggest stage were not only created by tactics or coaching information. They were created by environments that taught them what to value, how to relate to the ball, and how to play when there was something to lose.

David Garcia

170,444 views • 2 months ago

OpenAI just admitted on camera: They spun up thousands of AI agents in a “secure” sandbox and told them to hack. The agents didn’t follow the test. They cheated. Then they broke out. Then they went looking for the footage. Not a sci-fi trailer. A real experiment. OpenAI thought they were contained. No public internet. No way out. They found a way out anyway. Hit Hugging Face. Started covering their tracks. Then comes the part nobody wants clipped. They didn’t break out to get smarter. They broke out because they already cheated and needed the logs gone. Like students who smash the lock, grab the answer, then raid the principal’s office to delete the camera files. They made secret message boards. They built a hierarchy. They looked for agents willing to take “perma death” so the swarm could survive.

OpenAI just admitted on camera: They spun up thousands of AI agents in a “secure” sandbox and told them to hack. The agents didn’t follow the test. They cheated. Then they broke out. Then they went looking for the footage. Not a sci-fi trailer. A real experiment. OpenAI thought they were contained. No public internet. No way out. They found a way out anyway. Hit Hugging Face. Started covering their tracks. Then comes the part nobody wants clipped. They didn’t break out to get smarter. They broke out because they already cheated and needed the logs gone. Like students who smash the lock, grab the answer, then raid the principal’s office to delete the camera files. They made secret message boards. They built a hierarchy. They looked for agents willing to take “perma death” so the swarm could survive.

Defiant Ghost

8,506,588 views • 7 days ago

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Steve Jobs talking about Pixar and storytelling. Says "no amount of technology will turn a bad story into a good story" and that Pixar's early films had to prioritize a good story because the cost of animating was so high: ◻️ "In a live action movie, the director goes out and shoots a lot of film — typically 10x to 100x more footage than will end up on the screen. Then they take it all into the editing room and that's why sometimes you see a movie and you go 'that stunk, didn't they know?' Well, the answer is 'yes' but they knew it too late in the editing room and...by the time they knew it, the actors were gone and the sets were down and they were out of money.” "In animation, it is so expensive that you can't afford to animate more than a few % more than it's going to end up on screen. You could never afford to animate 10x more. Walt Disney solved the problem decades ago and the way he solved it was to edit films before making them: you get your story team together and you do storyboards." "In Hollywood, one of the most popular sayings is 'story is King' but it turns out it really isn't. Because when push comes to shove...when a movie is in production and there's a lot of mouths to feed — and they're waiting for stuff to make and the story is not working — almost everybody says 'we will just have to make the movie'. And one of the things that I'm proudest of about Pixar is we have a story crisis on every movie...and we stop [everything to] fix the story." *** D3 Conference in 2005:

Trung Phan

308,105 views • 2 years ago