Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

📢 Umar Khalid now challenges his UAPA confinement claiming there’s 'No physical evidence except a SPEECH.' ~ So anyone can now spread HATE, provoke RIOTS, and then cry free speech? Such offenders need no mercy. STRICT ACTION.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

122,287 subscribers

41,646 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

The Bulwark

29,725,796 views • 11 months ago

AG Pam Bondi: "There's free speech, and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

AG Pam Bondi: "There's free speech, and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

TheBlaze

8,268,172 views • 11 months ago

Free for anyone to use, I don't care and I don't need credit. Fuck the people trying to suppress free speech so that some mud slinging third world shit monkey can keep raping, pillaging, and destroying such a beautiful country. Remigrate all of shitters.

Sensitive content

Free for anyone to use, I don't care and I don't need credit. Fuck the people trying to suppress free speech so that some mud slinging third world shit monkey can keep raping, pillaging, and destroying such a beautiful country. Remigrate all of shitters.

Don P Bongwater

139,020 views • 2 months ago

Memory Lane. This is the Prime Minister of Australia. The Hate Speech Bill - We don’t need to imagine how free speech erodes - we watched it happen in real time. A man in his victory speech treating those who voted for him, like his dog Toto. They shout ‘Aussie Aussie Aussie’. He tells them down, down, no. Stating he intends to run an ‘orderly Gov & it starts now’.

Memory Lane. This is the Prime Minister of Australia. The Hate Speech Bill - We don’t need to imagine how free speech erodes - we watched it happen in real time. A man in his victory speech treating those who voted for him, like his dog Toto. They shout ‘Aussie Aussie Aussie’. He tells them down, down, no. Stating he intends to run an ‘orderly Gov & it starts now’.

JT 🌸🇦🇺👨‍🍳 🦕 🥥

27,004 views • 7 months ago

JD Vance said UK has no free speech….so this van is now cruising Cotswolds area waiting for his arrival where he’s renting a $11K a week manor for another family vacation

JD Vance said UK has no free speech….so this van is now cruising Cotswolds area waiting for his arrival where he’s renting a $11K a week manor for another family vacation

Wu Tang is for the Children

8,901,452 views • 1 year ago

The traitorous Labor government and their uniparty colleagues have launched an unprecedented assault on freedom of speech, they can't beat us in the free marketplace of ideas so they've moved to criminalise patriotic dissent in a desperate bid to hold onto power. Patriots must assemble in every city across Australia on August 30 to once again March For Australia, we must take a stand for free speech and push for our right to oppose the mass immigration multicultural agenda before this police state grows too entrenched to reverse. There is no such thing as "hate speech", there is no such thing as a "hate group", the ANZACs died for a free Australia and free Australia we will have. We must push our politicians to repeal 18C, repeal all hate speech laws, repeal the hate group bill, and hold a free speech referendum to enshrine it in our constitution. Join us on the 30th of August, bring your Aussie flag, and march with us for a free Australia.

The traitorous Labor government and their uniparty colleagues have launched an unprecedented assault on freedom of speech, they can't beat us in the free marketplace of ideas so they've moved to criminalise patriotic dissent in a desperate bid to hold onto power. Patriots must assemble in every city across Australia on August 30 to once again March For Australia, we must take a stand for free speech and push for our right to oppose the mass immigration multicultural agenda before this police state grows too entrenched to reverse. There is no such thing as "hate speech", there is no such thing as a "hate group", the ANZACs died for a free Australia and free Australia we will have. We must push our politicians to repeal 18C, repeal all hate speech laws, repeal the hate group bill, and hold a free speech referendum to enshrine it in our constitution. Join us on the 30th of August, bring your Aussie flag, and march with us for a free Australia.

auspill

38,349 views • 4 days ago

This morning, Free Speech Union Council Member Dane Giraud Dane Giraud ✡️ argued in the NZ Herald that we don't need new hate speech laws to deal with Brian Tamaki. Hours later, police seized his guns. No charge. No arrest. No stated plan or threat. Tamaki's rhetoric was divisive and not something the Free Speech Union in anyway condones. But a power aimed today at a man no one wants to defend can tomorrow be aimed at you. If he broke the law, charge him. If he didn't, we should all be asking who is next. Watch Dane Giraud's full piece 👇

This morning, Free Speech Union Council Member Dane Giraud Dane Giraud ✡️ argued in the NZ Herald that we don't need new hate speech laws to deal with Brian Tamaki. Hours later, police seized his guns. No charge. No arrest. No stated plan or threat. Tamaki's rhetoric was divisive and not something the Free Speech Union in anyway condones. But a power aimed today at a man no one wants to defend can tomorrow be aimed at you. If he broke the law, charge him. If he didn't, we should all be asking who is next. Watch Dane Giraud's full piece 👇

🗣 Free Speech Union ✊

11,730 views • 1 month ago

Must watch One real interview with real journalists is enough to expose such politicians. This BJP neta is known for his hate speeches. Delhi witnessed Hindu-Muslim communal violence after his speech in 2020. And now same person is instigating Hindu-Sikh communal hatered through his fake transcripted Video. Delhi Police is yet to take action on his 6 year old video. Can we expect any action the new one ?

Must watch One real interview with real journalists is enough to expose such politicians. This BJP neta is known for his hate speeches. Delhi witnessed Hindu-Muslim communal violence after his speech in 2020. And now same person is instigating Hindu-Sikh communal hatered through his fake transcripted Video. Delhi Police is yet to take action on his 6 year old video. Can we expect any action the new one ?

Saurabh Bharadwaj

38,850 views • 6 months ago

This incident happened in Andhra Pradesh. A BLO (Booth Level Officer) was brutally attacked by the peaceful community for absolutely no reason while performing his official duty. Now I request Election Commission of India to take strict action against these rioters and permanently remove their voter identity. If the ECI can’t take action against such people, then there is no point in conducting SIR in such regions. Dear Pawan Kalyan ji, please take strict action against these rioters, remove all their identity proofs, and put them behind bars.

This incident happened in Andhra Pradesh. A BLO (Booth Level Officer) was brutally attacked by the peaceful community for absolutely no reason while performing his official duty. Now I request Election Commission of India to take strict action against these rioters and permanently remove their voter identity. If the ECI can’t take action against such people, then there is no point in conducting SIR in such regions. Dear Pawan Kalyan ji, please take strict action against these rioters, remove all their identity proofs, and put them behind bars.

🔱🚩YATNAL HINDU SENE 🚩🔱

14,904 views • 1 month ago

Trump claimed that his birthday note to Epstein didn’t exist. He called it a “hoax”—despite physical evidence—and Republicans in Congress capitulated. Now that a bipartisan group of lawyers has verified the book’s authenticity, there’s no denying it anymore. Release the files.

Trump claimed that his birthday note to Epstein didn’t exist. He called it a “hoax”—despite physical evidence—and Republicans in Congress capitulated. Now that a bipartisan group of lawyers has verified the book’s authenticity, there’s no denying it anymore. Release the files.

Congressman Robert Garcia

282,322 views • 11 months ago

DISTURBING: Charlie Kirk’s assassination is already being weaponized to justify a crackdown on free speech. What began as outrage over vile online celebrations of his death is now morphing into government demands to police “hate speech.” Rep. Clay Higgins has called for lifetime bans from social media and even revoking driver’s licenses for those who mocked Kirk’s murder. Attorney General Pam Bondi went further, vowing to target Americans for “hate speech”—a term with no legal standing in the United States. Violence and incitement are already crimes, yet Bondi is blurring words with actions, echoing the same speech codes that see 30 people a day jailed in the UK for memes. Even President Trump hesitated when pressed on First Amendment rights. But Kirk’s own words left no doubt: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America.” He fought—and ultimately died—for that principle. Will Republicans now cross the red line Kirk warned us about? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report shows why this fight could define the future of free speech. Watch the full episode:👇

DISTURBING: Charlie Kirk’s assassination is already being weaponized to justify a crackdown on free speech. What began as outrage over vile online celebrations of his death is now morphing into government demands to police “hate speech.” Rep. Clay Higgins has called for lifetime bans from social media and even revoking driver’s licenses for those who mocked Kirk’s murder. Attorney General Pam Bondi went further, vowing to target Americans for “hate speech”—a term with no legal standing in the United States. Violence and incitement are already crimes, yet Bondi is blurring words with actions, echoing the same speech codes that see 30 people a day jailed in the UK for memes. Even President Trump hesitated when pressed on First Amendment rights. But Kirk’s own words left no doubt: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America.” He fought—and ultimately died—for that principle. Will Republicans now cross the red line Kirk warned us about? ZeeeMediaOfficial's report shows why this fight could define the future of free speech. Watch the full episode:👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

84,635 views • 11 months ago

The view just basically said the quiet part out loud. Kamala lost because Americans can now think for themselves and we have free speech on X. We no longer need to listen to the fake news media for the narrative and we can call out their lies in real time

The view just basically said the quiet part out loud. Kamala lost because Americans can now think for themselves and we have free speech on X. We no longer need to listen to the fake news media for the narrative and we can call out their lies in real time

Libs of TikTok

4,604,991 views • 1 year ago

Location: Faridabad, Haryana A deeply disturbing case of open hate speech and incitement to mass violence has surfaced. Surendra Rawat from Palwal has uploaded a song on YouTube that openly calls for the murder of Muslims in the name of cow protection, using genocidal language such as: “We will teach these fanatics how to live in India… anyone who slaughters the cow will be killed, their bodies cut up, eaten, and burned with kerosene.” This is not speech, this is a direct call for lynching, murder, and communal violence. We urge People’s Police - Faridabad Police Haryana Police to take immediate suo motu action, register an FIR under IPC/BNS, UAPA, and IT Act, remove the video, and arrest the accused without delay. Such open threats endanger lives, public order, and the Constitution itself. Hate crimes cannot be ignored. Action must be swift and strict.

Location: Faridabad, Haryana A deeply disturbing case of open hate speech and incitement to mass violence has surfaced. Surendra Rawat from Palwal has uploaded a song on YouTube that openly calls for the murder of Muslims in the name of cow protection, using genocidal language such as: “We will teach these fanatics how to live in India… anyone who slaughters the cow will be killed, their bodies cut up, eaten, and burned with kerosene.” This is not speech, this is a direct call for lynching, murder, and communal violence. We urge People’s Police - Faridabad Police Haryana Police to take immediate suo motu action, register an FIR under IPC/BNS, UAPA, and IT Act, remove the video, and arrest the accused without delay. Such open threats endanger lives, public order, and the Constitution itself. Hate crimes cannot be ignored. Action must be swift and strict.

Rising Falcon

108,840 views • 7 months ago

Glenn Beck: Real Strength of Free Nation Is Protecting Speech We Hate Not Just Speech We Love “If you outlaw the burning of a flag, you have placed the cloth above the constitution that it represents, you have made the flag an idol. We don't worship idols, if you can only praise the flag and never protest it, then it is stops being a symbol of freedom and starts being an idol of obedience. Now that's the argument for allowing it, at least to me, because the real strength of a free nation is how we protect not the speech we love, but how we endure the speech we hate…” – Glenn Beck

Glenn Beck: Real Strength of Free Nation Is Protecting Speech We Hate Not Just Speech We Love “If you outlaw the burning of a flag, you have placed the cloth above the constitution that it represents, you have made the flag an idol. We don't worship idols, if you can only praise the flag and never protest it, then it is stops being a symbol of freedom and starts being an idol of obedience. Now that's the argument for allowing it, at least to me, because the real strength of a free nation is how we protect not the speech we love, but how we endure the speech we hate…” – Glenn Beck

Vigilant Fox 🦊

47,801 views • 11 months ago

Tucker UNLEASHES on AG Pam Bondi with a blistering 3-minute rebuttal to her remarks on “hate speech.” The monologue version of Tucker is back. This is EXACTLY what we need from him right now. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. This is the Attorney General of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, telling you that there is this other category called hate speech. And of course, the implication is that’s a crime. There’s almost no sentence that Charlie Kirk. “And I, I’m not running the risk of appropriating his memory for my own ends by saying this. It’s provable. There’s no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that. And you’ve got to think the Attorney General didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate that she just threw that out there, that she hadn’t thought about it. “You hope that. You hope that Charlie Kirk’s death won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build. You hope that. “You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country. And trust me, if it is, if that does happen. There is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. “And there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul. A human being with a soul. A free man has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express human his views. “And by the way, that thinking, and not to pile on the Attorney General, who’s a very nice person, but that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it’s okay to shoot people you disagree with to kill Nazis for saying things they don’t like. “Why do they believe that? How did we get here? Is it the video games? Is it the SSRIs? Yeah, probably. But what it really is is 12 and then 16 years of indoctrination in our schools at the hands of people who tell them that, who say exactly what the Attorney General just said. “Well, there’s free speech, which of course, we all acknowledge is important, so, so important. But then there’s this thing called hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate. But they don’t define it that way. They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence. And we punish violence, don’t we? “Of course we do. They’ve been taught that every year of their lives. And so naturally, most of them believe it. When Charlie Kirk is shot in the throat with a .36 on camera. I doubt very many young Americans want to see something like that or actually applaud the death of a man, a father, a husband. “But they’ve been told for their entire lives in schools exactly what Pam Bondi just told them. Well, there’s free speech, but then there’s also hate speech. And woe to those who engage in it because it’s a crime.”

Tucker UNLEASHES on AG Pam Bondi with a blistering 3-minute rebuttal to her remarks on “hate speech.” The monologue version of Tucker is back. This is EXACTLY what we need from him right now. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. This is the Attorney General of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, telling you that there is this other category called hate speech. And of course, the implication is that’s a crime. There’s almost no sentence that Charlie Kirk. “And I, I’m not running the risk of appropriating his memory for my own ends by saying this. It’s provable. There’s no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that. And you’ve got to think the Attorney General didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate that she just threw that out there, that she hadn’t thought about it. “You hope that. You hope that Charlie Kirk’s death won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build. You hope that. “You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country. And trust me, if it is, if that does happen. There is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. “And there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul. A human being with a soul. A free man has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express human his views. “And by the way, that thinking, and not to pile on the Attorney General, who’s a very nice person, but that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it’s okay to shoot people you disagree with to kill Nazis for saying things they don’t like. “Why do they believe that? How did we get here? Is it the video games? Is it the SSRIs? Yeah, probably. But what it really is is 12 and then 16 years of indoctrination in our schools at the hands of people who tell them that, who say exactly what the Attorney General just said. “Well, there’s free speech, which of course, we all acknowledge is important, so, so important. But then there’s this thing called hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate. But they don’t define it that way. They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence. And we punish violence, don’t we? “Of course we do. They’ve been taught that every year of their lives. And so naturally, most of them believe it. When Charlie Kirk is shot in the throat with a .36 on camera. I doubt very many young Americans want to see something like that or actually applaud the death of a man, a father, a husband. “But they’ve been told for their entire lives in schools exactly what Pam Bondi just told them. Well, there’s free speech, but then there’s also hate speech. And woe to those who engage in it because it’s a crime.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

262,867 views • 11 months ago

🇺🇸🇬🇧 ELON: WITHOUT FREE SPEECH, THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY, JUST LOOK AT BRITAIN "We need to have a public square where there’s true freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is the bedrock of democracy. If there’s not freedom of speech, people cannot make an informed vote. And if you can’t make an informed vote, you don’t have a real democracy. So the purpose of acquiring Twitter was to try to bring it more to the center. No left-wing voices have been banned or anything like that, or suppressed. What we’re trying to do is give equal weight to all parts of the country so that there can be a public town square where people can exchange ideas and hopefully not provoke violence. And I think that’s fundamental. It’s why it’s the First Amendment, because people came from countries where they could be killed or imprisoned for what they said. And in fact, this is happening all around the world as we speak, even in places like Britain." Source: Elon Musk, Baron Capital, Ron Baron

🇺🇸🇬🇧 ELON: WITHOUT FREE SPEECH, THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY, JUST LOOK AT BRITAIN "We need to have a public square where there’s true freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is the bedrock of democracy. If there’s not freedom of speech, people cannot make an informed vote. And if you can’t make an informed vote, you don’t have a real democracy. So the purpose of acquiring Twitter was to try to bring it more to the center. No left-wing voices have been banned or anything like that, or suppressed. What we’re trying to do is give equal weight to all parts of the country so that there can be a public town square where people can exchange ideas and hopefully not provoke violence. And I think that’s fundamental. It’s why it’s the First Amendment, because people came from countries where they could be killed or imprisoned for what they said. And in fact, this is happening all around the world as we speak, even in places like Britain." Source: Elon Musk, Baron Capital, Ron Baron

Mario Nawfal

111,316 views • 9 months ago

At a Culver City Unified School District meeting, a member of the public called in to comment on a proposed parcel tax, district finances, declining enrollment, and enforcement of residency requirements. Once her time ran out, board member Triston Ezidore—whose bio is packed with leftist signaling—jumped in with, “Can we mute the hate speech?” The speaker, clearly surprised, replied, “What hate speech?” She was told her time was up, and they moved on. Apparently, criticizing the district’s fiscal decisions is now “hate speech.” It’s becoming clearer every day that many progressive politicians in California no patience for the democratic process when it involves actual dissent. Basic respect for the right to free speech has weakened to a perilous degree.

At a Culver City Unified School District meeting, a member of the public called in to comment on a proposed parcel tax, district finances, declining enrollment, and enforcement of residency requirements. Once her time ran out, board member Triston Ezidore—whose bio is packed with leftist signaling—jumped in with, “Can we mute the hate speech?” The speaker, clearly surprised, replied, “What hate speech?” She was told her time was up, and they moved on. Apparently, criticizing the district’s fiscal decisions is now “hate speech.” It’s becoming clearer every day that many progressive politicians in California no patience for the democratic process when it involves actual dissent. Basic respect for the right to free speech has weakened to a perilous degree.

Laura Powell

49,530 views • 3 months ago