Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

UNDEFEATED: It was early Friday morning that my attorney, Benjamin Barr, called me with the news neither of us will ever forget: we had just overturned the verdict against me in Democracy Partners v. O’Keefe before the hostile D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. This established undercover reporting as protected... show more

James O'Keefe

3,576,608 subscribers

423,550 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Образование Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Democracy Partners vs. O’Keefe - VERDICT OVERTURNED VICTORY IN D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, PANEL RULES 2-1 Appeal Court Rules Undercover Journalism Protected as 1st Amendment Activity setting precedent for all undercover journalism. Democratic-appointed appellate Judge SIDES with O’Keefe! Today - my faith in the future of journalism has been restored.

Democracy Partners vs. O’Keefe - VERDICT OVERTURNED VICTORY IN D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, PANEL RULES 2-1 Appeal Court Rules Undercover Journalism Protected as 1st Amendment Activity setting precedent for all undercover journalism. Democratic-appointed appellate Judge SIDES with O’Keefe! Today - my faith in the future of journalism has been restored.

James O'Keefe

1,725,122 просмотров • 10 дней назад

JAMES O’KEEFE WINS MASSIVE FIRST AMENDMENT VICTORY O’Keefe is celebrating a major victory in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that his attorney says strengthens protections for undercover and independent journalism. “This is a tremendous victory… for every journalist who takes on powerful people.” After a 10-YEAR legal battle, O’Keefe’s attorney says he “never backed down.” 🔥🇺🇸 James O'Keefe RealClearPolitics Benjamin Barr

JAMES O’KEEFE WINS MASSIVE FIRST AMENDMENT VICTORY O’Keefe is celebrating a major victory in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that his attorney says strengthens protections for undercover and independent journalism. “This is a tremendous victory… for every journalist who takes on powerful people.” After a 10-YEAR legal battle, O’Keefe’s attorney says he “never backed down.” 🔥🇺🇸 James O'Keefe RealClearPolitics Benjamin Barr

Real America's Voice (RAV)

51,902 просмотров • 2 дней назад

🚨THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON TRIAL IN D.C.: Appellate Judge says, “…This could be the end of muckraking” The DC Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing a case involving James O’Keefe and Democracy Partners that could determine whether undercover journalism remains legal in Washington, D.C. The issue at hand is whether reporters can be punished not for defamation, but for the act of going undercover and whether alleged “harm” can be blamed on the investigation itself rather than the publication, effectively sidestepping First Amendment protections. Before a panel of three judges on the Federal Appeals Court Thursday were two issues. Issue 1: Can an undercover reporter be accused of fraud for misrepresenting themselves during investigative journalism? We argue that any “harm” comes from the publication, not the investigation, and is fully protected by the First Amendment. Issue 2: Can a fiduciary duty be imposed on a part-time, unpaid intern who never signed an NDA? We say no, such a duty cannot be unilaterally forced on someone in these circumstances. “That’s what investigative journalists do. This determination by this court decides whether undercover reporting can exist in the nations capital moving forward.” - James O’Keefe’s attorney Ben Barr Michael Casey

🚨THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON TRIAL IN D.C.: Appellate Judge says, “…This could be the end of muckraking” The DC Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing a case involving James O’Keefe and Democracy Partners that could determine whether undercover journalism remains legal in Washington, D.C. The issue at hand is whether reporters can be punished not for defamation, but for the act of going undercover and whether alleged “harm” can be blamed on the investigation itself rather than the publication, effectively sidestepping First Amendment protections. Before a panel of three judges on the Federal Appeals Court Thursday were two issues. Issue 1: Can an undercover reporter be accused of fraud for misrepresenting themselves during investigative journalism? We argue that any “harm” comes from the publication, not the investigation, and is fully protected by the First Amendment. Issue 2: Can a fiduciary duty be imposed on a part-time, unpaid intern who never signed an NDA? We say no, such a duty cannot be unilaterally forced on someone in these circumstances. “That’s what investigative journalists do. This determination by this court decides whether undercover reporting can exist in the nations capital moving forward.” - James O’Keefe’s attorney Ben Barr Michael Casey

O’Keefe Media Group

47,113 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON TRIAL IN D.C.: Appellate Judge says, “…This could be the end of muckraking” The DC Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing a case involving James O’Keefe and Democracy Partners that could determine whether undercover journalism remains legal in Washington, D.C. The issue at hand is whether reporters can be punished not for defamation, but for the act of going undercover and whether alleged “harm” can be blamed on the investigation itself rather than the publication, effectively sidestepping First Amendment protections. Before a panel of three judges on the Federal Appeals Court Thursday were two issues. Issue 1: Can an undercover reporter be accused of fraud for misrepresenting themselves during investigative journalism? We argue that any “harm” comes from the publication, not the investigation, and is fully protected by the First Amendment. Issue 2: Can a fiduciary duty be imposed on a part-time, unpaid intern who never signed an NDA? We say no, such a duty cannot be unilaterally forced on someone in these circumstances. “That’s what investigative journalists do. This determination by this court decides whether undercover reporting can exist in the nations capital moving forward.” - James O’Keefe’s Attorney Ben Barr Michael Casey

🚨THE FIRST AMENDMENT ON TRIAL IN D.C.: Appellate Judge says, “…This could be the end of muckraking” The DC Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing a case involving James O’Keefe and Democracy Partners that could determine whether undercover journalism remains legal in Washington, D.C. The issue at hand is whether reporters can be punished not for defamation, but for the act of going undercover and whether alleged “harm” can be blamed on the investigation itself rather than the publication, effectively sidestepping First Amendment protections. Before a panel of three judges on the Federal Appeals Court Thursday were two issues. Issue 1: Can an undercover reporter be accused of fraud for misrepresenting themselves during investigative journalism? We argue that any “harm” comes from the publication, not the investigation, and is fully protected by the First Amendment. Issue 2: Can a fiduciary duty be imposed on a part-time, unpaid intern who never signed an NDA? We say no, such a duty cannot be unilaterally forced on someone in these circumstances. “That’s what investigative journalists do. This determination by this court decides whether undercover reporting can exist in the nations capital moving forward.” - James O’Keefe’s Attorney Ben Barr Michael Casey

James O'Keefe

211,707 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Oral arguments are set to begin in the DC Circuit court of appeals, in case of Democracy Partners v James O’Keefe, PV I’m before the DC Circuit court of appeals today, appealing the verdict in that case, the issue before the three Judge panel is whether an investigative reporter engages in ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’ when they record someone under pretenses in DC, or owes a ‘fiduciary duty’ when undercover to the subject they expose. I was sued nine years ago by this group that was trying to elect Hillary Clinton engaged in ‘birddogging.’ Trump brought up the videos in the debate with Clinton. We are fighting for the first amendment itself, the right to repeat what someone tells you! I will never ‘settle’ or give up! Listen LIVE to the oral arguments which begin at 930am HERE:

Oral arguments are set to begin in the DC Circuit court of appeals, in case of Democracy Partners v James O’Keefe, PV I’m before the DC Circuit court of appeals today, appealing the verdict in that case, the issue before the three Judge panel is whether an investigative reporter engages in ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’ when they record someone under pretenses in DC, or owes a ‘fiduciary duty’ when undercover to the subject they expose. I was sued nine years ago by this group that was trying to elect Hillary Clinton engaged in ‘birddogging.’ Trump brought up the videos in the debate with Clinton. We are fighting for the first amendment itself, the right to repeat what someone tells you! I will never ‘settle’ or give up! Listen LIVE to the oral arguments which begin at 930am HERE:

James O'Keefe

186,514 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

GOA attorney Rob Olson defended GOA's First Amendment rights before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. GOA's rights have been infringed by ATF HQ's unconstitutional "gag order." This prevents us from printing the news about an unlawful ATF spy program we uncovered.🤯

GOA attorney Rob Olson defended GOA's First Amendment rights before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. GOA's rights have been infringed by ATF HQ's unconstitutional "gag order." This prevents us from printing the news about an unlawful ATF spy program we uncovered.🤯

Gun Owners of America

47,366 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Today, a federal court heard arguments in the government's appeal of my case against Pete Hegseth. It was a day in court not just for me, but for millions of retired veterans and our First Amendment rights. I will not back down from this fight.

Today, a federal court heard arguments in the government's appeal of my case against Pete Hegseth. It was a day in court not just for me, but for millions of retired veterans and our First Amendment rights. I will not back down from this fight.

Senator Mark Kelly

217,267 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Conservative former Judge Luttig, who served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for 15 years, on today's ruling in Colorado: "The individual justices of the Colorado supreme court brought honor to their court and as well to the state and federal judiciaries with their opinion tonight in this historic case...Their opinion is unassailable under the objective law of the federal Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States ought to affirm this decision today."

Conservative former Judge Luttig, who served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for 15 years, on today's ruling in Colorado: "The individual justices of the Colorado supreme court brought honor to their court and as well to the state and federal judiciaries with their opinion tonight in this historic case...Their opinion is unassailable under the objective law of the federal Constitution and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States ought to affirm this decision today."

MeidasTouch

1,103,879 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The Democrat mayor of Arcadia, California, was charged in federal court with acting as an illegal agent of the People's Republic of China. We break it down on Verdict:

The Democrat mayor of Arcadia, California, was charged in federal court with acting as an illegal agent of the People's Republic of China. We break it down on Verdict:

Ted Cruz

21,772 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Have you ever had a moment that transports you back in time to an unforgettable moment in your life? This is the Temple Church in London which was concreted in 1165. It is the shared church of the Inner and Middle Temple inns of court, located between them. The latter is where my eldest daughter was called to the bar. It serves as a spiritual center for the lawyers associated with the Inns, She was the first in our family to attend university and it was one of the proudest moments in my life, to see her in her robe and wig. It was a heart stopping moment I will never forget. 🎥 TikTok -

Have you ever had a moment that transports you back in time to an unforgettable moment in your life? This is the Temple Church in London which was concreted in 1165. It is the shared church of the Inner and Middle Temple inns of court, located between them. The latter is where my eldest daughter was called to the bar. It serves as a spiritual center for the lawyers associated with the Inns, She was the first in our family to attend university and it was one of the proudest moments in my life, to see her in her robe and wig. It was a heart stopping moment I will never forget. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

40,515 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

First time in the History of Tarn Taran a verdict was given early morning 4 am. The court says the arrest of Kanchan Preet Kaur is unconstitutional. Adv Kler also condemned another lady disguised as Kanchan preet & Produced in the court.

First time in the History of Tarn Taran a verdict was given early morning 4 am. The court says the arrest of Kanchan Preet Kaur is unconstitutional. Adv Kler also condemned another lady disguised as Kanchan preet & Produced in the court.

Akashdeep Thind

37,011 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Breaking news The Constitutional Court, in the first judgment, has found that Parliament’s impeachment rules were unconstitutional for allowing the National Assembly to halt proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa at an early stage, before a full inquiry into the allegations in the Phala Phala scandal. The court found that this approach undermined accountability and transparency, as it prevented proper consideration of whether a prima facie case existed. It also set aside the 2022 parliamentary vote rejecting the independent panel report, finding it was influenced by a material error of law and therefore invalid.

Breaking news The Constitutional Court, in the first judgment, has found that Parliament’s impeachment rules were unconstitutional for allowing the National Assembly to halt proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa at an early stage, before a full inquiry into the allegations in the Phala Phala scandal. The court found that this approach undermined accountability and transparency, as it prevented proper consideration of whether a prima facie case existed. It also set aside the 2022 parliamentary vote rejecting the independent panel report, finding it was influenced by a material error of law and therefore invalid.

MDN NEWS

53,568 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has challenged the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, as this law is a direct attack on the country's constitution, which not only provides equal rights to its citizens but also grants them complete religious freedom. This bill is a dangerous conspiracy to strip Muslims of their religious freedom. Therefore, we have challenged the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court, and the state units of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind will also challenge the constitutional validity of this law in the High Courts of their respective states. We are confident that just as the court has delivered justice in many cases, we will also get justice in this important and unconstitutional law. #WaqfBoardAmendmentBill

Arshad Madani

70,843 просмотров • 1 год назад

VIDEO | Delhi: CJP spokesperson Saurav Das says, "I had filed an injunction suit also seeking Rs 2 crore in damages from certain persons and organisations that were running fake news and all kinds of propaganda against me and invading my private life. It's a right-to-privacy suit. The Delhi High Court took up the matter. Platform X has already taken action against, I think, all of these tweets proactively, because of which an injunction was not required today. And the next date of hearing is September 14, when a more detailed hearing would happen on the injunction application. We hope that the right to privacy of everybody, not just me, will be protected by the High Court, as it has already protected several others, including Prime Minister Modi's degree and everything else that has been protected in the past. So, I'm sure the right-to-privacy application will also succeed in that manner. We have full faith in the Delhi High Court."

VIDEO | Delhi: CJP spokesperson Saurav Das says, "I had filed an injunction suit also seeking Rs 2 crore in damages from certain persons and organisations that were running fake news and all kinds of propaganda against me and invading my private life. It's a right-to-privacy suit. The Delhi High Court took up the matter. Platform X has already taken action against, I think, all of these tweets proactively, because of which an injunction was not required today. And the next date of hearing is September 14, when a more detailed hearing would happen on the injunction application. We hope that the right to privacy of everybody, not just me, will be protected by the High Court, as it has already protected several others, including Prime Minister Modi's degree and everything else that has been protected in the past. So, I'm sure the right-to-privacy application will also succeed in that manner. We have full faith in the Delhi High Court."

Press Trust of India

268,997 просмотров • 8 дней назад

In Mississippi, after a lower court didn’t want to enforce the law, the Fifth Circuit of Appeals sided with Judicial Watch and ruled that counting late ballots is unlawful. The case is now before the Supreme Court, which will decide whether Election Day means what it says.

In Mississippi, after a lower court didn’t want to enforce the law, the Fifth Circuit of Appeals sided with Judicial Watch and ruled that counting late ballots is unlawful. The case is now before the Supreme Court, which will decide whether Election Day means what it says.

Judicial Watch ⚖️

16,523 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here was my message to the graduating class of the UC College of Law, San Francisco: Our democracy is in peril. And you are the generation that must save it. As officers of the court, it will be up to you to defend the constitution and the uphold the rule of law. I believe you will do just that.

Here was my message to the graduating class of the UC College of Law, San Francisco: Our democracy is in peril. And you are the generation that must save it. As officers of the court, it will be up to you to defend the constitution and the uphold the rule of law. I believe you will do just that.

Adam Schiff

438,264 просмотров • 3 лет назад