Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Under article 2 section 1 of the Constitution Federal Judges cannot overrule an executive order by the POTUS. These radical activist Judges are ruling against the Constitution and should be reprimanded accordingly, and President Trump should ignore these Judge and give them the middle finger.

jnottah's profile picture

Hatton, America is back

69,007 subscribers

181,036 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

President Trump knows his rights under Article II of the Constitution. Despite the Supreme Court's ridiculous ruling, President Trump should not give a penny from USAID. The DOJ is bold, fearless, and capable. They will not let activist judges or rattled law professors rule against the Constitution. Thanks for having me, NEWSMAX
5:27

President Trump knows his rights under Article II of the Constitution. Despite the Supreme Court's ridiculous ruling, President Trump should not give a penny from USAID. The DOJ is bold, fearless, and capable. They will not let activist judges or rattled law professors rule against the Constitution. Thanks for having me, NEWSMAX

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

151,433 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We planted 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump and they are ruling against Trump. That is an admission to Planting Judges to rule against Trump and the American Voters!
0:31

We planted 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump and they are ruling against Trump. That is an admission to Planting Judges to rule against Trump and the American Voters!

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

504,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This shouldn't be a controversial take: Judges who break their oaths of office should be IMPEACHED. AG JAMES UTHMEIER: "These judicial abuses across the country are wrong. We need to start impeaching these judges and making them live up to the oath. People take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law — when they don't want to do that, they should get a new job. The role of a judge is not to push radical politics and ideologies; it's to enforce the law."
1:07

This shouldn't be a controversial take: Judges who break their oaths of office should be IMPEACHED. AG JAMES UTHMEIER: "These judicial abuses across the country are wrong. We need to start impeaching these judges and making them live up to the oath. People take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and the rule of law — when they don't want to do that, they should get a new job. The role of a judge is not to push radical politics and ideologies; it's to enforce the law."

Benny Johnson

72,003 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BREAKING: A federal judge has just extended a restraining order INDEFINITELY that's barring Trump from deploying the National Guard into Chicago. Since when do the courts decide what Trump can do with the Naitonal Guard? These judges are RADICAL ACTIVISTS operating as an extension of the FAR-LEFT radicals throughout America. Trump should IGNORE the judge and send in the National Guard to SAVE Chicago!
1:29

BREAKING: A federal judge has just extended a restraining order INDEFINITELY that's barring Trump from deploying the National Guard into Chicago. Since when do the courts decide what Trump can do with the Naitonal Guard? These judges are RADICAL ACTIVISTS operating as an extension of the FAR-LEFT radicals throughout America. Trump should IGNORE the judge and send in the National Guard to SAVE Chicago!

Gunther Eagleman™

322,728 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The Executive Branch cannot properly function if activist liberal judges can unilaterally block presidential actions over the entire country. If a federal district court judge wants executive powers, they can try and run for President themselves. The Trump Administration will immediately fight back against these absurd and unconstitutional orders. The American people overwhelmingly voted for President Trump's agenda, and it will be fully implemented.
1:34

The Executive Branch cannot properly function if activist liberal judges can unilaterally block presidential actions over the entire country. If a federal district court judge wants executive powers, they can try and run for President themselves. The Trump Administration will immediately fight back against these absurd and unconstitutional orders. The American people overwhelmingly voted for President Trump's agenda, and it will be fully implemented.

White House Press Office

1,705,442 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Article 142 has become a nuclear missile against Democratic forces available to judiciary 24x7. We cannot have a situation where you direct the President of India and on what basis? The only right you have under the Constitution is to interpret the Constitution under Article 145(3). There it has to be five judges when Article 145(3) was there, the number of judges in the Supreme Court was eight, 5 out of 8, now 5 out of 30 odd more. The judges who issued a mandamus virtually to the President and presented a scenario it will be law of the land have forgotten the power of the Constitution. How can that combination of judges deal with something under Article 145(3) if it was preserved then for five out of eight. #RajyaSabha
1:36

Article 142 has become a nuclear missile against Democratic forces available to judiciary 24x7. We cannot have a situation where you direct the President of India and on what basis? The only right you have under the Constitution is to interpret the Constitution under Article 145(3). There it has to be five judges when Article 145(3) was there, the number of judges in the Supreme Court was eight, 5 out of 8, now 5 out of 30 odd more. The judges who issued a mandamus virtually to the President and presented a scenario it will be law of the land have forgotten the power of the Constitution. How can that combination of judges deal with something under Article 145(3) if it was preserved then for five out of eight. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

394,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 EXPOSED: Chuck Schumer ADMITS to packing the courts with 235 progressive judges to sabotage Trump! Is this not an admission of packing the courts? "We planted 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump and they are ruling against Trump." That sure sounds like an admission to PLANTING JUDGES to subvert our constitution and the American Voters! Traitor! We are in a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS! Who's with me? 🇺🇸
0:31

🚨 EXPOSED: Chuck Schumer ADMITS to packing the courts with 235 progressive judges to sabotage Trump! Is this not an admission of packing the courts? "We planted 235 progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump and they are ruling against Trump." That sure sounds like an admission to PLANTING JUDGES to subvert our constitution and the American Voters! Traitor! We are in a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS! Who's with me? 🇺🇸

Project Constitution

338,613 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The President has Article II powers to run the executive branch of this government and we're seeing a handful of judges trying to stop that and subvert the will of the people. I would rather follow the Constitution than a judge who has got an agenda.
0:49

The President has Article II powers to run the executive branch of this government and we're seeing a handful of judges trying to stop that and subvert the will of the people. I would rather follow the Constitution than a judge who has got an agenda.

Kari Lake

155,479 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: Trump Admin RUSHES BACK to Supreme Court After Rogue Judge Defies Constitution (AGAIN) 🚨 The Trump administration is back at the U.S. Supreme Court—yet again—seeking emergency relief from another lawless order handed down by an unelected, black-robe tyrant in a lower district court. This time, the issue? Whether a single inferior federal trial judge can force the executive branch to continue funding an agency that the President—elected by the people—no longer supports. The agency in question? NIH. The judge likes it. So apparently, that means President Trump must fund it, even though it’s not his policy priority. Sound insane? That’s because it is. 🔥 Enter Solicitor General John Sauer—the absolute legal beast who’s been carrying the weight of fighting this lawfare circus. Once again, he’s delivered a world-class argument showing that this activist judge is completely ignoring the Constitution, past precedent, and even the Supreme Court’s OWN ruling from just four months ago in a nearly identical case about the Department of Education. What part of “you have no jurisdiction here” do these judges not understand? These out-of-control district courts are openly rebelling not only against President Trump and the Article II Executive Branch, but even against Congress (Article I) and the Supreme Court itself (Article III). They are attempting a judicial coup, inventing authority they do not have, and asserting power over Congress, the President, and the American people. Let’s be crystal clear: ➡️ These district courts are creations of Congress. ➡️ They are not co-equal branches of government. ➡️ They do not get to dictate policy from the bench. ➡️ And they do not outrank the President of the United States. The Administrative State—this mythical fourth branch of government—does not exist in our Constitution. These “independent agencies” are unaccountable, unconstitutional, and now backed by activist judges who think emotion is law. The language in their rulings? Estrogenic, hysterical, airplane-meltdown nonsense. America didn’t elect these robed tantrum-throwers—we elected President Trump. It’s time to restore order. It’s time to slap these runaway courts back into their constitutional lane. And it’s time the Supreme Court brings the gavel down—HARD. READ MY FULL ARTICLE EXPLAINING IT BELOW 👇
4:24

🚨 BREAKING: Trump Admin RUSHES BACK to Supreme Court After Rogue Judge Defies Constitution (AGAIN) 🚨 The Trump administration is back at the U.S. Supreme Court—yet again—seeking emergency relief from another lawless order handed down by an unelected, black-robe tyrant in a lower district court. This time, the issue? Whether a single inferior federal trial judge can force the executive branch to continue funding an agency that the President—elected by the people—no longer supports. The agency in question? NIH. The judge likes it. So apparently, that means President Trump must fund it, even though it’s not his policy priority. Sound insane? That’s because it is. 🔥 Enter Solicitor General John Sauer—the absolute legal beast who’s been carrying the weight of fighting this lawfare circus. Once again, he’s delivered a world-class argument showing that this activist judge is completely ignoring the Constitution, past precedent, and even the Supreme Court’s OWN ruling from just four months ago in a nearly identical case about the Department of Education. What part of “you have no jurisdiction here” do these judges not understand? These out-of-control district courts are openly rebelling not only against President Trump and the Article II Executive Branch, but even against Congress (Article I) and the Supreme Court itself (Article III). They are attempting a judicial coup, inventing authority they do not have, and asserting power over Congress, the President, and the American people. Let’s be crystal clear: ➡️ These district courts are creations of Congress. ➡️ They are not co-equal branches of government. ➡️ They do not get to dictate policy from the bench. ➡️ And they do not outrank the President of the United States. The Administrative State—this mythical fourth branch of government—does not exist in our Constitution. These “independent agencies” are unaccountable, unconstitutional, and now backed by activist judges who think emotion is law. The language in their rulings? Estrogenic, hysterical, airplane-meltdown nonsense. America didn’t elect these robed tantrum-throwers—we elected President Trump. It’s time to restore order. It’s time to slap these runaway courts back into their constitutional lane. And it’s time the Supreme Court brings the gavel down—HARD. READ MY FULL ARTICLE EXPLAINING IT BELOW 👇

Project Constitution

89,349 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Biden on his 235 judicial confirmations: “These judges will be independent, they’ll be fair and they’ll be impartial. And they’ll respect the rule of law. And most importantly, they’ll uphold the Constitution.” One of his confirmed judges: “Illegal immigration should not be criminalized.” You can’t make this up
0:15

Biden on his 235 judicial confirmations: “These judges will be independent, they’ll be fair and they’ll be impartial. And they’ll respect the rule of law. And most importantly, they’ll uphold the Constitution.” One of his confirmed judges: “Illegal immigration should not be criminalized.” You can’t make this up

Libs of TikTok

446,116 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.
1:13

Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to limit jurisdiction of federal courts. My Injunctive Authority Clarification Act does exactly that. Woke activist judges must be not allowed to make sweeping legislative decisions for all Americans.

Rep Andy Biggs

414,438 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I want to be very clear. I didn’t vote for President Trump to listen to activist judges. I voted for President Trump to ignore these sorts of rulings and see what the courts say then. I voted for Trump to continue building the border wall regardless of what a random district judge has to say. I voted for mass deportations regardless of what a random district judge has to say. If Republicans want to win the midterms then ignore these activist district judges and continue delivering results for the people who voted for you.
1:00

I want to be very clear. I didn’t vote for President Trump to listen to activist judges. I voted for President Trump to ignore these sorts of rulings and see what the courts say then. I voted for Trump to continue building the border wall regardless of what a random district judge has to say. I voted for mass deportations regardless of what a random district judge has to say. If Republicans want to win the midterms then ignore these activist district judges and continue delivering results for the people who voted for you.

Derrick Evans

27,123 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen