Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Underground scenario

37,377 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Victor Davis Hanson: The Optimistic, the Realistic, and the Pessimistic Scenarios for Iran With the Israel-Iran war stretching into its second week, commentators from all sides of the political arena have been delivering their optimistic, pessimistic, and realistic opinions on the conflict. Here are the facts: The war is going in Israel's favor. There’s a 50-50 chance of regime change, but only a 25% chance the new leaders will be better than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Trump administration might have to intervene but is holding back because it thinks Israel will find a creative way to destroy Iran's underground nuclear facilities on its own, surmises Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words:” 👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: 👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: 👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: The Daily Signal cannot continue to tell stories, like this one, without the support of our viewers: 00:00 Introduction to the Iranian-Israeli Conflict 00:19 Optimistic Scenario 01:32 Pessimistic Scenario 04:57 Realistic Scenario 07:59 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Daily Signal

77,683 views • 1 year ago

US-ISRAEL WAR ON IRAN: The UAE’s🇦🇪 ‘years of planning for such a scenario’ prepared it for this crisis ‘The UAE’s air defence system is not only THAAD, it’s a combination of a number of air defence systems, including one that is built here in the UAE. We have recently heard the White House spokesperson specifically say that the attack that has happened on the US Consulate was defended with missiles produced here in the UAE. So that is something that has been in the making for years, and it just happened to happen that we used them today. We hoped that we would never do that. What got me surprised, really, is how nonchalant it feels here. All of these attacks, the number of missiles and drones that have been targeted at the UAE, that is actually more than all of the missiles that went to all of the other countries Iran has targeted. Yet we can drive outside, we go to the mall, we go to restaurants, we go to the mosque for prayer. We need to credit the first responders, the way they have been conducting themselves. Fires have been extinguished at a very high speed. People’s lives are being facilitated and eased up. Tourists who’ve been stranded here in Dubai have got their bill for their hotel extensions picked up by the UAE government, and those corridors are now being opened slowly to allow those stranded to go back home. It’s an amazement of how work of years and years of planning has now come out useful whenever it was needed.’ -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center joins us on Monday’s Going Underground to discuss the UAE’s navigation of the regional crisis Don’t miss it, follow us on X to watch the full interview on Monday, or follow our Rumble 🏴‍☠️ channel, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

105,348 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇲🇮🇷 The nuclear taboo, the one line no administration has crossed since 1945, now becomes something people are willing to say out loud in a strategy meeting? That's what analyst Malcolm Nance is reacting to, after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene posted that nuclear weapons are being discussed in White House strategy meetings on Iran. Malcolm says this matters more than almost anything else in the war. He describes his own time on watch at a national nuclear command post. The briefings built specifically to terrify young service members out of ever thinking a nuclear strike is survivable, let alone usable. The doctrine has held since Hiroshima: no first use, no exceptions, full stop. In his read, even raising the question in a room reveals something wrong with who's in that room. The scenario he says has circulated internally isn't a city-leveling strike. It's a low-yield "demolition" device dropped into Iran's underground enrichment sites, sold internally as something short of a real bomb. Nance rejects that framing outright. He walks through the physics: any detonation, buried or not, throws irradiated material into the stratosphere, where it circulates and comes down globally within days. In food, in water, everywhere, for everyone, not just the target country. His sharpest point is structural, not moral: the presidential authority to authorize this has almost no check built into it. Two men, two keys, one authenticated order; that's the entire chain between a decision and execution. The safeguard he says should exist, a Joint Chiefs chairman refusing the order outright, is the one he's watching for, and hasn't seen yet. Malcolm is clear this is his own alarm, not confirmed policy. But his closing question is the one worth sitting with: If this is being discussed and nobody in that room is willing to say no on the record, who exactly is the check left standing? Thank you Malcolm Nance for our conversation

Mario Nawfal

319,370 views • 22 days ago

🚨 NUCLEAR WARNING 🚨 IRAN JUST TOLD THE U.S. IT HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 11 NUCLEAR BOMBS. AND NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff just confirmed: Iran told American officials it possesses enough enriched uranium for approximately 11 nuclear weapons. That's not a typo. ELEVEN. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium → CONFIRMED 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 Satellite images show NEW excavation activity at Isfahan → Iran may be trying to RECOVER uranium from the bombed site 💀 The U.S. can't confirm whether Iran already MOVED the stockpile before strikes began 💀 Iran may DESTROY the material before U.S. forces can reach it → making verification IMPOSSIBLE ⚠️ Trump confirmed Iran was "2 weeks away" from a weapon BEFORE the war started ⚠️ The war has now been going for 10 DAYS ⚠️ That means the clock may have ALREADY run out ⚠️ U.S. and Israel discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES to seize or dilute the uranium ⚠️ "Doomsday" E-6B nuclear command planes already DEPLOYED to the Middle East They're showing you oil prices and destroyed warships. They're NOT showing you that 11 nuclear bombs' worth of enriched uranium is somewhere inside Iran and NOBODY knows exactly where. Here's the nightmare scenario nobody is talking about: → Iran has the uranium → The U.S. bombed the known storage sites → Iran may have MOVED it before the strikes → If it's underground or dispersed, air strikes CAN'T reach it → Ground troops would need to enter the MOST fortified country in the Middle East → With hundreds of thousands of armed IRGC fighters waiting → While $20,000 drones bleed the defense budget dry The last time the U.S. sent special forces into Iran → Operation Eagle Claw, 1980 → 8 Americans died. Zero objectives achieved. TOTAL FAILURE. Now they want to do it again. To find uranium that may have already been moved. In a country with a new radical Supreme Leader. While the military is stretched across 6 fronts. 11 bombs. Location UNKNOWN. And the clock is still ticking. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This won't stay on your feed long. Follow + RT NOW. ⚠️

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

25,105 views • 6 months ago