正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Underscores knows a thing or two about making forward-thinking pop music that mashes together influences from all kinds of genres. So Tia Ho asked her… What’s the deal with pop music right now? “The influence of hyperpop has become super big,” she says. “You can hear it in most...

19,106 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Joe Rogan gets into a serious conversation with Andrew Wilson about Erika Kirk and why her reaction to her husband’s murder “seemed insane.” ANDREW WILSON: “Can you even imagine how that’s got to feel for [Erika Kirk]? Especially now that she has tens of thousands of people accusing her of... conspiring to murder... her own husband?” ROGAN: “Yeah. And hindsight is 20/20, but given the reaction, I think it probably would have been better for her to lay low for a little while.” WILSON: “1,000%.” ROGAN: “The going out with the sparklers was not a great idea. Like, all that was not a great idea because it just seemed insane. And maybe sometimes in grief or when you’re trying to show that they’re not going to hold us back, people make choices that could be interpreted in a very bad way.” WILSON: “100%. The interesting thing is I asked her about that. I asked her, like, what’s the deal there?" ROGAN: “What’s with the sparklers?” WILSON: "Well, what’s with the aberration in behavior? She’s like, ‘Look, I was put in like the worst spot I could ever think of. I was the background character. I was just there to support my husband. That’s it. The only reason I even really got involved is because Charlie was so pro-marriage and he wanted to demonstrate to the world you can be married and have kids and this is the good life.’” “So when he dies, she takes over, right? This moves over to her control. She says, ‘Well, the first thing I want to do is honor his last book. That’s the very first thing I want to do. I want to honor his legacy.’ And she’s like, ‘I don’t know exactly how to take this position. At the same time, there’s expectations for the organization my husband built that I want to honor, but I’m also in the middle of grief.’ “And, it’s like, I don’t know how you balance that position. Who’s been in that position ever?”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

340,809 次观看 • 27 天前

Frontline health advocate says pediatricians are earning $1,000,000 to "vaccinate" children🤬 Chiropractor Dr. Bill Lionberger: "[One pediatrician's]... incentive plan... was more than $1,000,000" Lionberger says this discovery was made when a mother—whose children developed allergies after being "vaccinated" with conventional "vaccines"—said no to the Covid jabs for her children, and her pediatrician turned angry "he grabbed what he thought was the patient's file and he threw it at her... [but it actually] was the file for his financial payoffs and incentives for vaccinating a certain percentage of his practice" "his earnings...[were about] $1,400,000... But it was more than $1,000,000 in terms of incentives" This clip of Lionberger is taken from a conversation with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on July 15, 2026 ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Mayer: "Wait, so you're telling me I didn't know this. So there were incentive programs that were implemented around 2021 to further incentivize doctors to vaccinate? And do those incentive programs come from the insurance company or from the Department of Public Health?" Lionberger: "Well, I became aware of this because of the flow that we have with the number of patients that we see. "And here's an example. We had a patient go into her pediatrician's office, had kids in there for a number of years, and she said, I'm just not sure about these yet. And I— And I, my kids got this allergy and that problem, and this allergy. And I'd them to be exempted for a while we see how these things play out. "And he basically said, if you don't vaccinate, we're going to kick you out of the practice. So either vaccinate or you're leaving now. I mean, just that. And she says, well, I'm not going to vaccinate. I mean, if you're going to kick me out— He says, fine, you're kicked out. "And he grabbed what he thought was the patient's file and he threw it at her. Right? This is the her telling me what happened. And so she gets out and she goes to opening up this file. It actually was the file for his financial payoffs and incentives for vaccinating a certain percentage of his practice. Right? We have a copy of that in our records now." Mayer: "So he threw what he thought was her medical— The medical chart for her kids at her in frustration and anger because she wouldn't vaccinate. And it ended up being the wrong folder. And it contained his incentive plan for vaccination?" Lionberger: "It was his entire, not only incentive plan, but his earnings. $1,400,000— or about $1,400,000. I guess—I remember generally. But it was more than $1,000,000. Okay? In terms of incentives, with all of the breakdown. "And so you're like, wow, that really is happening. Right? It's not just a rumor. I mean, you got an example of it. And then we saw later, we saw the incentives coming from Blue Cross Blue Shield, and those began to surface over time. "And, the timing of that is a bit muddled, but it's there now. It's an incentive for the pediatricians and, you know, as everybody seems to know more now, the pediatricians really wouldn't be busy and have any practice if they didn't have the vaccine schedule. Right? "And yet, if you ask them details about it, most of them don't go very deep in terms of information. They just follow it blindly, almost. Exactly."

Sense Receptor

10,763 次观看 • 1 个月前

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 次观看 • 3 个月前