Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Understanding Bigscreen Beyond, EP. 001 ↳ Wired vs. Wireless VR Headsets

BigscreenVR's profile picture

Bigscreen

27,548 subscribers

26,412 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieGaming
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von tim
timvor 3 Jahren

the mic reveal was crazy

Profilbild von OPEN PC Reviews
OPEN PC Reviewsvor 3 Jahren

If you keep posting videos like this, I'm gonna have no choice but to purchase this headset.

Profilbild von Mosul Medic
Mosul Medicvor 3 Jahren

I agree with the sentiment on wireless headsets. I am excited to receive my headset

Profilbild von Dovah Kro
Dovah Krovor 3 Jahren

Seeing how comfortable it looks on your head while you're talking and moving your head, makes me all the more confident in the preorder. Thank you for making the video!

Profilbild von Christian Yang
Christian Yangvor 3 Jahren

@mylesdotapp "weight, all day comfort, clarity" spot on! the aspects I care the most about as well, can't wait to get beyond😍

Profilbild von Jedigoat
Jedigoatvor 3 Jahren

Been using bigscreen since day one on the oculus quest 2, glad to see how much growth the company has made. Will the beyond ever come to Australia?

Profilbild von Bigscreen
Bigscreenvor 3 Jahren

It’s already available to preorder in Australia today!

Profilbild von Stéphan Schamp
Stéphan Schampvor 3 Jahren

This was a great explainer. Can't wait to be able to buy this in EU (Belgium)!

Profilbild von Jason Moore
Jason Moorevor 3 Jahren

The second you guys implement eye tracking I'm there. Any chance?

Profilbild von The Tech Basement
The Tech Basementvor 3 Jahren

I have ran my original Vive on the wireless adapter for over 6 hrs without discomfort or changing the 🔋. The wireless argument here doesn't hold up. Did the team think of a modular option? @Valve I'm waiting for the Deckard!

Ähnliche Videos

Today, we're excited to announce Bigscreen Beyond, the world's smallest VR headset Pre-order now: Watch the trailer:
1:53

Today, we're excited to announce Bigscreen Beyond, the world's smallest VR headset Pre-order now: Watch the trailer:

Bigscreen

439,236 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

See what reviewers like LinusTechTips and Optimum think about the Bigscreen Beyond VR headset: ‣ Ultra-high resolution micro-OLED displays ‣ Pancake optics ‣ Insane 127-gram form factor ‣ Plays your favorite SteamVR games Order now, ships in 1 week:
0:41

See what reviewers like LinusTechTips and Optimum think about the Bigscreen Beyond VR headset: ‣ Ultra-high resolution micro-OLED displays ‣ Pancake optics ‣ Insane 127-gram form factor ‣ Plays your favorite SteamVR games Order now, ships in 1 week:

Bigscreen

541,999 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Released by Reality Labs at Meta Research at #ECCV2024, Nymeria is a large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for full-body motion understanding with potential applications in VR/MR headsets, smart glasses and more. More on this work + access to the dataset ➡️
0:25

Released by Reality Labs at Meta Research at #ECCV2024, Nymeria is a large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for full-body motion understanding with potential applications in VR/MR headsets, smart glasses and more. More on this work + access to the dataset ➡️

AI at Meta

52,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Wireless vs. Wired: The EMF Difference is Staggering. A simple demonstration reveals the hidden cost of convenience. Scientific consensus suggests potential cellular damage can begin at an EMF level of 0.5. - With a Wireless Headset: While streaming audio, the EMF field between the phone and the headset measured between 1.9 and 4.6, spiking as high as 20. This places the user's brain directly in a field far exceeding the safety threshold. - With Wired Headphones: Playing the same audio, EMF levels remained at a safe 0.03. The conclusion is inescapable. The wireless signal itself is the primary source of intense EMF exposure. For a safer alternative, the wired option provides the same experience without the dangerous field.
2:19

Wireless vs. Wired: The EMF Difference is Staggering. A simple demonstration reveals the hidden cost of convenience. Scientific consensus suggests potential cellular damage can begin at an EMF level of 0.5. - With a Wireless Headset: While streaming audio, the EMF field between the phone and the headset measured between 1.9 and 4.6, spiking as high as 20. This places the user's brain directly in a field far exceeding the safety threshold. - With Wired Headphones: Playing the same audio, EMF levels remained at a safe 0.03. The conclusion is inescapable. The wireless signal itself is the primary source of intense EMF exposure. For a safer alternative, the wired option provides the same experience without the dangerous field.

Camus

74,417 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

JUST IN: Senator Tim Scott says "Charles has been so helpful for me in understanding and appreciating the complexity—it's far beyond commodities vs. securities. Understanding and appreciating the magnitude of the opportunity to create market structure is crucial." #Cardano $ADA
0:49

JUST IN: Senator Tim Scott says "Charles has been so helpful for me in understanding and appreciating the complexity—it's far beyond commodities vs. securities. Understanding and appreciating the magnitude of the opportunity to create market structure is crucial." #Cardano $ADA

Angry Crypto Show

76,651 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The unseen dangers of quantum computing go far beyond speed. They could change the way you think. “If our thoughts can be read, then they can also be sent back into our brains, which is really scary. The frequencies are designed to interact with our brains in the exact places where our thought processes come from.” Going Rogue with Lara Logan EP. 30 – WIRED FOR CONTROL Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #QuantumComputing #Transhumanism
1:01

The unseen dangers of quantum computing go far beyond speed. They could change the way you think. “If our thoughts can be read, then they can also be sent back into our brains, which is really scary. The frequencies are designed to interact with our brains in the exact places where our thought processes come from.” Going Rogue with Lara Logan EP. 30 – WIRED FOR CONTROL Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #QuantumComputing #Transhumanism

Lara Logan

63,018 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Another entrepreneur, same result when it comes to Apple Vision Pro vs. other VR headsets. Was just talking to founder of Nanome: Steve McCloskey. His app is being used by scientists to come up with new drugs and new materials. He passed me a crystal structure as a file. Way way way way better than in other headsets. Better integrated. Better looking. Easier to control. Integrated into the real world. Damn, our kids are gonna have such powerful tools to learn biology and material science, among so many other things. Have you put your head inside a molecule today? I did, and it was STUNNING. It's clear to me that shortly the entire industry will be building for Apple. The leaders are speaking loud: Apple is way way way ahead of the others.
1:36

Another entrepreneur, same result when it comes to Apple Vision Pro vs. other VR headsets. Was just talking to founder of Nanome: Steve McCloskey. His app is being used by scientists to come up with new drugs and new materials. He passed me a crystal structure as a file. Way way way way better than in other headsets. Better integrated. Better looking. Easier to control. Integrated into the real world. Damn, our kids are gonna have such powerful tools to learn biology and material science, among so many other things. Have you put your head inside a molecule today? I did, and it was STUNNING. It's clear to me that shortly the entire industry will be building for Apple. The leaders are speaking loud: Apple is way way way ahead of the others.

Robert Scoble

160,086 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The internet was the training set for intelligence Nobody has built the equivalent for the physical world Previously, Lucas Ngoo co-founded Carousell, scaled it $1B+ Now at CortexAI he's collecting the data robotics labs need to train foundation models Cameras, VR headsets, glasses on factory workers, retail workers, everyday people. Recording real-world manipulation work Not building the robot. Not training the model. Collecting what goes in 2026: scale data 2027+: start rolling robots out Initially 90% teleoperation, 10% autonomy While humans step in, the system keeps learning That's the flywheel toward full autonomy 🎙️ Lucas Ngoo, Co-Founder & CEO, CortexAI on Fondo.com Start (full ep in comments)
1:28

The internet was the training set for intelligence Nobody has built the equivalent for the physical world Previously, Lucas Ngoo co-founded Carousell, scaled it $1B+ Now at CortexAI he's collecting the data robotics labs need to train foundation models Cameras, VR headsets, glasses on factory workers, retail workers, everyday people. Recording real-world manipulation work Not building the robot. Not training the model. Collecting what goes in 2026: scale data 2027+: start rolling robots out Initially 90% teleoperation, 10% autonomy While humans step in, the system keeps learning That's the flywheel toward full autonomy 🎙️ Lucas Ngoo, Co-Founder & CEO, CortexAI on Fondo.com Start (full ep in comments)

David J Phillips

110,268 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

FH6 VR MOD V4.0、更に安定性が上がって素晴らしい もうほとんど完璧に近い ウチの環境 (Bigscreen Beyond 2e) だと IPDの数値を細かく調整しても微妙に視差がドンピシャにならず ほんのちょっとだけ寄り目気味になってしまう (注視する距離による) けど、それでも充分過ぎるクオリティ 楽しすぎるぞ
5:32

FH6 VR MOD V4.0、更に安定性が上がって素晴らしい もうほとんど完璧に近い ウチの環境 (Bigscreen Beyond 2e) だと IPDの数値を細かく調整しても微妙に視差がドンピシャにならず ほんのちょっとだけ寄り目気味になってしまう (注視する距離による) けど、それでも充分過ぎるクオリティ 楽しすぎるぞ

シワスタカシ (趣味用)

22,168 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

threadcast ep 11: iggy azalea 01:04 intro to crypto 02:51 how she got here 08:26 0-1 crypto moment 11:35 celebrity rugs 15:00 sahil (lmfaoo) 18:00 her brother 22:40 mother timeline 27:30 understanding attention 29:30 who’s running her account 30:25 helping other celebrities 35:55 early music vs early crypto 41:20 vitalik 45:45 the long game 47:40 wrap up
53:21

threadcast ep 11: iggy azalea 01:04 intro to crypto 02:51 how she got here 08:26 0-1 crypto moment 11:35 celebrity rugs 15:00 sahil (lmfaoo) 18:00 her brother 22:40 mother timeline 27:30 understanding attention 29:30 who’s running her account 30:25 helping other celebrities 35:55 early music vs early crypto 41:20 vitalik 45:45 the long game 47:40 wrap up

threadguy

1,148,907 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"Aydan why don't you make videos anymore?" Why? Because over the last two years every single time I get in vr to try and film. This shit happens. It makes it so fucking hard to get motivated to do it when I can't get one locked off angle shot. Before you say something like "Have you covered all the reflective surfaces?" "Have you re-paired the trackers?" "Try replacing the lighthouses?" "Try replacing the cables?" "The Dongles might be bad?" "The Trackers might be bad?" "The Controllers might be bad?" "Try a USB hub?" "Try USB Ports?" "Try this 7-1 in one dongle hub?" "Try Tundra Trackers?" "Try This 3-1 dongle hub?" "Try pairing one controller each to a dongle, and pair the trackers to a single dongle too?" "Have you tried reinstalling the software? "Have you tried Steam VR Beta?" "Try Slime trackers?" "Try Quest Pro?" "Try less 2.4ghz band devices?" "Maybe your Wifi bulbs are interfering?" "Try Bigscreen Beyond 2e?" "Try 2 Lighthouses?" "Try 3 Lighthouses?" "Try 4 Lighthouses?" "Maybe your computers bad? Get a new one?" YES. I have fucking tried all that shit. Literally have spent thousands of dollars trouble shooting this issues. I currently own 3 tracking headsets 9 lighthouses 6 vive trackers 3 tundra trackers 8 slime trackers 5 pairs of index controllers. And I've tried on 3 different computers. I have talked to like 20 different people. No one has an answer. I'm at the end of my rope at this point. Every time I get into VR I'm filled with dread because I know I'm going to get mad or frustrated. I'm just...sad. I want to make content, but I don't fucking know what to do at this point.
1:08

"Aydan why don't you make videos anymore?" Why? Because over the last two years every single time I get in vr to try and film. This shit happens. It makes it so fucking hard to get motivated to do it when I can't get one locked off angle shot. Before you say something like "Have you covered all the reflective surfaces?" "Have you re-paired the trackers?" "Try replacing the lighthouses?" "Try replacing the cables?" "The Dongles might be bad?" "The Trackers might be bad?" "The Controllers might be bad?" "Try a USB hub?" "Try USB Ports?" "Try this 7-1 in one dongle hub?" "Try Tundra Trackers?" "Try This 3-1 dongle hub?" "Try pairing one controller each to a dongle, and pair the trackers to a single dongle too?" "Have you tried reinstalling the software? "Have you tried Steam VR Beta?" "Try Slime trackers?" "Try Quest Pro?" "Try less 2.4ghz band devices?" "Maybe your Wifi bulbs are interfering?" "Try Bigscreen Beyond 2e?" "Try 2 Lighthouses?" "Try 3 Lighthouses?" "Try 4 Lighthouses?" "Maybe your computers bad? Get a new one?" YES. I have fucking tried all that shit. Literally have spent thousands of dollars trouble shooting this issues. I currently own 3 tracking headsets 9 lighthouses 6 vive trackers 3 tundra trackers 8 slime trackers 5 pairs of index controllers. And I've tried on 3 different computers. I have talked to like 20 different people. No one has an answer. I'm at the end of my rope at this point. Every time I get into VR I'm filled with dread because I know I'm going to get mad or frustrated. I'm just...sad. I want to make content, but I don't fucking know what to do at this point.

Aydan

12,723 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Hash Rate - Ep 108: Targon - $TAO Subnet 4 🧙 Guest: James Woodman of Targon (on Bittensor) lets you run all the latest AI models at an 85% cost savings to AWS or OpenAI. 00:00 Bittensor ENDGAME 06:01 James Woodman's Journey to Bittensor 12:07 Understanding Targon 34:06 The Power of Bittensor vs. ChatGPT 41:56 Dippy: A Case Study 45:34 Revenue Generation 46:40 Competing with OpenAI and AWS 55:05 Target Market and Go-to-Market Strategy
1:02:04

Hash Rate - Ep 108: Targon - $TAO Subnet 4 🧙 Guest: James Woodman of Targon (on Bittensor) lets you run all the latest AI models at an 85% cost savings to AWS or OpenAI. 00:00 Bittensor ENDGAME 06:01 James Woodman's Journey to Bittensor 12:07 Understanding Targon 34:06 The Power of Bittensor vs. ChatGPT 41:56 Dippy: A Case Study 45:34 Revenue Generation 46:40 Competing with OpenAI and AWS 55:05 Target Market and Go-to-Market Strategy

Mark Jeffrey

16,992 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Starknet Builder Show EP #001 IS LIVE! 🔥 We have mrigank (co-founder Eddy Finance | 🟢 Mainnet Live and Raize Club) sitting down with Rehan Nek to drop no-BS insights on: - DeFi's real edge as yield generation, beyond ponzinomics - Building prediction markets on Starknet (BTCFi arc) 🥷 from 0-1 - Tapping into degen psychology for product stickiness - Why UX is the ultimate challenge & moat - The raw truth about finding PMF in crypto - Why Starknet (BTCFi arc) 🥷's ecosystem support hits different Plus spicy takes on hackathon culture, prediction markets matter, and what makes 2025 DeFi's moment. The realest builder conversation you'll hear this week 🎧
34:32

Starknet Builder Show EP #001 IS LIVE! 🔥 We have mrigank (co-founder Eddy Finance | 🟢 Mainnet Live and Raize Club) sitting down with Rehan Nek to drop no-BS insights on: - DeFi's real edge as yield generation, beyond ponzinomics - Building prediction markets on Starknet (BTCFi arc) 🥷 from 0-1 - Tapping into degen psychology for product stickiness - Why UX is the ultimate challenge & moat - The raw truth about finding PMF in crypto - Why Starknet (BTCFi arc) 🥷's ecosystem support hits different Plus spicy takes on hackathon culture, prediction markets matter, and what makes 2025 DeFi's moment. The realest builder conversation you'll hear this week 🎧

Starknet India

10,245 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Neuroscientist Dr. Jeff Beck from Noumenal Labs discusses the fundamental nature of representation, understanding, and modelling, comparing biological intelligence with current artificial intelligence. Jeff argues that *how* information is represented dictates predictive ability and that LLMs, while impressive at symbol manipulation and pattern matching (like next-word prediction), lack the *grounded*, causal understanding of the world inherent in biological systems. Timestamps: 00:00 - Cat visual cortex experiments & discovering orientation sensitivity (slide projector analogy) 01:49 - Representation choice and neural coding (orientation vs. feature intensity) 02:30 - Choice of representation impacts predictions; generative models 03:15 - Importance of choosing the right generative model for predictions 03:35 - The problem: We don't know the brain's true generative model 03:55 - Theory of Mind (ToM) in LLMs 04:05 - Jeff Beck's ToM tests on early ChatGPT (stapler example) 05:40 - ChatGPT recognizing the ToM test vs. passing it 06:32 - Analogy: LLMs recognizing known problems vs. generalizing (sum/product riddle) 07:25 - Do LLMs implicitly build world models? Vicarious experience analogy 07:59 - The difference: Grounding symbols in reality outside language 08:35 - AI Alignment: Difficulty in capturing human reward functions & belief formation 09:21 - Nightmare scenario: Humans as "complacent value function selectors" 09:44 - Hope: AI enhancing human understanding, not replacing thought 10:08 - Philosophy of science: Science realism vs. modeling pockets of regularity 10:39 - Noise in models as ignorance or deliberate exclusion (design choice) 11:00 - Design choices in science, controlled experiments, and induced bias 11:29 - Are there true, discoverable mathematical laws of the universe? 11:41 - Is there a "true" ground truth distribution (P)? Beck's answer: No (with nuance) 12:55 - Ontological vs. Epistemological divide: Perfect models vs. models of regularities 13:21 - Are scientific models "false by definition"? The Bayesian perspective 14:07 - "All knowledge is conditional"; Are foundational theories (e.g., FEP) true or just perspectives? 14:51 - FEP as a mathematical framework, not a theory; models are just models 15:54 - Legibility vs. Utility: Useful but illegible AI models 16:01 - Prediction vs. Explanation: Trusting black boxes can be unsatisfying 16:30 - Why understanding AI matters: Ensuring alignment with human decisions/values 17:08 - Line-of-sight legibility as an alignment approach 17:14 - Benefits of explainable AI: Human understanding and value alignment verification 18:21 - RL components: Prediction engine, reward function, policy; the alignment challenge 19:25 - Trusting AI = Trusting its policy aligns with our reward + its superior beliefs 19:57 - Language: Intrinsic representation vs. pointers between shared minds 20:21 - Why language works: Shared internal models and common grounding 21:00 - Basis of shared understanding: Not linguistic, but shared experience/intuitive physics 22:44 - Consciousness and language as lossy, simplified summaries of complex brain processes 23:22 - Evidence for simplification: Brain regions, perception vs. representation; limits of language models 24:32 - Counterpoint: Language captures complex/ambiguous human concepts 24:54 - Language as massive compression: The information bottleneck (Meister's paper) 26:22 - Implication: Language/actions are poor representations of internal understanding 27:03 - Can language models understand? The mimicry argument (Piantadosi) 27:33 - Beck's skepticism: LLMs excel at prediction/mimicry, not true understanding 28:09 - LLM explanations replicate structure but lack grounding 28:54 - Beck's test for LLM understanding: Genuine novelty beyond training data 29:19 - Summary: Symbol manipulation is not understanding; grounding is key 30:06 - Abstraction and Idealization in scientific modeling ("The Brain Abstracted") 30:45 - Revisiting Newton: Intuitive physics is correct for our world; idealizations are simplifications 32:01 - Sophistication & boundaries: Nested systems vs. one complex system? 32:32 - The boundary problem in FEP/Markov Blankets: Where to partition? 33:41 - Beck's research: Finding principled partitions based on interaction dynamics 35:44 - Beyond direct experience: Imagination, language, and learning 36:16 - Human creativity: Creating new *things* by combining modeled objects (Systems Engineering) 37:43 - Goal for AI: Automating systems engineering for creative combination 38:17 - Sutton's "Reward is Enough" paper 38:25 - The challenge of "Reward is Enough": Defining and obtaining the *right* reward function 39:02 - Difficulty of eliciting individual reward functions 39:52 - The core alignment problem: Accessing and representing individual reward functions 40:13 - Impossibility: Disentangling beliefs and rewards from observed actions 41:51 - Argument analogy: Disagreements stem from different beliefs or values 43:00 - Prerequisite for value inference: Understanding belief formation 43:13 - Building aligned systems: Sparsity of data, meta-models vs. base system modification 43:46 - Proposed solution: AI layer that models the human's belief formation system 44:40 - Alignment process: Align beliefs first, then address value differences 45:00 - Conclusion CC Maxwell Ramstead
45:03

Neuroscientist Dr. Jeff Beck from Noumenal Labs discusses the fundamental nature of representation, understanding, and modelling, comparing biological intelligence with current artificial intelligence. Jeff argues that *how* information is represented dictates predictive ability and that LLMs, while impressive at symbol manipulation and pattern matching (like next-word prediction), lack the *grounded*, causal understanding of the world inherent in biological systems. Timestamps: 00:00 - Cat visual cortex experiments & discovering orientation sensitivity (slide projector analogy) 01:49 - Representation choice and neural coding (orientation vs. feature intensity) 02:30 - Choice of representation impacts predictions; generative models 03:15 - Importance of choosing the right generative model for predictions 03:35 - The problem: We don't know the brain's true generative model 03:55 - Theory of Mind (ToM) in LLMs 04:05 - Jeff Beck's ToM tests on early ChatGPT (stapler example) 05:40 - ChatGPT recognizing the ToM test vs. passing it 06:32 - Analogy: LLMs recognizing known problems vs. generalizing (sum/product riddle) 07:25 - Do LLMs implicitly build world models? Vicarious experience analogy 07:59 - The difference: Grounding symbols in reality outside language 08:35 - AI Alignment: Difficulty in capturing human reward functions & belief formation 09:21 - Nightmare scenario: Humans as "complacent value function selectors" 09:44 - Hope: AI enhancing human understanding, not replacing thought 10:08 - Philosophy of science: Science realism vs. modeling pockets of regularity 10:39 - Noise in models as ignorance or deliberate exclusion (design choice) 11:00 - Design choices in science, controlled experiments, and induced bias 11:29 - Are there true, discoverable mathematical laws of the universe? 11:41 - Is there a "true" ground truth distribution (P)? Beck's answer: No (with nuance) 12:55 - Ontological vs. Epistemological divide: Perfect models vs. models of regularities 13:21 - Are scientific models "false by definition"? The Bayesian perspective 14:07 - "All knowledge is conditional"; Are foundational theories (e.g., FEP) true or just perspectives? 14:51 - FEP as a mathematical framework, not a theory; models are just models 15:54 - Legibility vs. Utility: Useful but illegible AI models 16:01 - Prediction vs. Explanation: Trusting black boxes can be unsatisfying 16:30 - Why understanding AI matters: Ensuring alignment with human decisions/values 17:08 - Line-of-sight legibility as an alignment approach 17:14 - Benefits of explainable AI: Human understanding and value alignment verification 18:21 - RL components: Prediction engine, reward function, policy; the alignment challenge 19:25 - Trusting AI = Trusting its policy aligns with our reward + its superior beliefs 19:57 - Language: Intrinsic representation vs. pointers between shared minds 20:21 - Why language works: Shared internal models and common grounding 21:00 - Basis of shared understanding: Not linguistic, but shared experience/intuitive physics 22:44 - Consciousness and language as lossy, simplified summaries of complex brain processes 23:22 - Evidence for simplification: Brain regions, perception vs. representation; limits of language models 24:32 - Counterpoint: Language captures complex/ambiguous human concepts 24:54 - Language as massive compression: The information bottleneck (Meister's paper) 26:22 - Implication: Language/actions are poor representations of internal understanding 27:03 - Can language models understand? The mimicry argument (Piantadosi) 27:33 - Beck's skepticism: LLMs excel at prediction/mimicry, not true understanding 28:09 - LLM explanations replicate structure but lack grounding 28:54 - Beck's test for LLM understanding: Genuine novelty beyond training data 29:19 - Summary: Symbol manipulation is not understanding; grounding is key 30:06 - Abstraction and Idealization in scientific modeling ("The Brain Abstracted") 30:45 - Revisiting Newton: Intuitive physics is correct for our world; idealizations are simplifications 32:01 - Sophistication & boundaries: Nested systems vs. one complex system? 32:32 - The boundary problem in FEP/Markov Blankets: Where to partition? 33:41 - Beck's research: Finding principled partitions based on interaction dynamics 35:44 - Beyond direct experience: Imagination, language, and learning 36:16 - Human creativity: Creating new *things* by combining modeled objects (Systems Engineering) 37:43 - Goal for AI: Automating systems engineering for creative combination 38:17 - Sutton's "Reward is Enough" paper 38:25 - The challenge of "Reward is Enough": Defining and obtaining the *right* reward function 39:02 - Difficulty of eliciting individual reward functions 39:52 - The core alignment problem: Accessing and representing individual reward functions 40:13 - Impossibility: Disentangling beliefs and rewards from observed actions 41:51 - Argument analogy: Disagreements stem from different beliefs or values 43:00 - Prerequisite for value inference: Understanding belief formation 43:13 - Building aligned systems: Sparsity of data, meta-models vs. base system modification 43:46 - Proposed solution: AI layer that models the human's belief formation system 44:40 - Alignment process: Align beliefs first, then address value differences 45:00 - Conclusion CC Maxwell Ramstead

Machine Learning Street Talk

17,828 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hash Rate - Ep 119: The #1 Bittensor Subnet CHUTES 🧙 Guest: Jon Durbin of Chutes Rayon Labs 00:00 What Is Chutes? 05:47 Metrics of Success and Growth 08:41 Navigating the AI and Crypto Divide 10:50 Revenue Model v. Subsidization 15:20 Mining and GPU Supply Dynamics 32:13 The Subnet Profitability Debate 34:14 AI vs Bitcoin: Understanding Value and Utility 36:39 Characteristics of a Successful Subnet 46:51 dTAO: Successes and Challenges 48:49 $TAO Root: Too Damn High? 52:18 Attracting Investment to Subnets 56:15 Innovative Solutions for Emission Challenges
1:05:18

Hash Rate - Ep 119: The #1 Bittensor Subnet CHUTES 🧙 Guest: Jon Durbin of Chutes Rayon Labs 00:00 What Is Chutes? 05:47 Metrics of Success and Growth 08:41 Navigating the AI and Crypto Divide 10:50 Revenue Model v. Subsidization 15:20 Mining and GPU Supply Dynamics 32:13 The Subnet Profitability Debate 34:14 AI vs Bitcoin: Understanding Value and Utility 36:39 Characteristics of a Successful Subnet 46:51 dTAO: Successes and Challenges 48:49 $TAO Root: Too Damn High? 52:18 Attracting Investment to Subnets 56:15 Innovative Solutions for Emission Challenges

Mark Jeffrey

46,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ep 123 out now! Joe Lonsdale sits down with Ian Cinnamon, co-founder & CEO Apex 🛰 He sold his computer vision company to Palantir, worked on Project Maven, and is now building the fastest growing satellite manufacturer. Reusable rockets, attritable satellites, space-based interceptors, asteroid mining, and more — the new space age has arrived! (00:00) Episode intro (02:09) MIT, cognitive science & building Synapse (06:17) PLTR, Project Maven & protestors (08:53) Ian's "light bulb moment" for building Apex (15:23) The space boom & new possibilities (21:30) Engineering for space & lessons from SpaceX (27:50) China's ambitious space plans (30:19) Golden Dome & space-based interceptors (36:00) Understanding orbit altitudes (40:00) Is China trying to steal Apex's IP? (44:13) Asteroid mining & new possibilities beyond Earth
46:20

Ep 123 out now! Joe Lonsdale sits down with Ian Cinnamon, co-founder & CEO Apex 🛰 He sold his computer vision company to Palantir, worked on Project Maven, and is now building the fastest growing satellite manufacturer. Reusable rockets, attritable satellites, space-based interceptors, asteroid mining, and more — the new space age has arrived! (00:00) Episode intro (02:09) MIT, cognitive science & building Synapse (06:17) PLTR, Project Maven & protestors (08:53) Ian's "light bulb moment" for building Apex (15:23) The space boom & new possibilities (21:30) Engineering for space & lessons from SpaceX (27:50) China's ambitious space plans (30:19) Golden Dome & space-based interceptors (36:00) Understanding orbit altitudes (40:00) Is China trying to steal Apex's IP? (44:13) Asteroid mining & new possibilities beyond Earth

American Optimist

23,574 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

COMING UP TODAY On Going Rogue with Lara Logan Lara Logan sits down with Peter Mcilvenna, a UK-based journalist, researcher, and former political and ministry insider, for a serious and wide-ranging conversation on a subject few are willing to address openly. This episode examines concerns about political influence operations tied to certain Islamist factions and how those efforts are unfolding inside the United States, with a focus on developments in Michigan, Texas, and beyond. This is a challenging and sensitive discussion grounded in reporting, research, and firsthand experience. The goal is understanding what is happening, how it is happening, and why it matters now. Going Rogue With Lara Logan | EP. 59 Hearts of Oak Available today on Spotify, X, YouTube, Rumble, Podbean, Apple Podcasts, and major platforms. #LaraLogan #GoingRogue #InvestigativeJournalism #CurrentEvents #Marxism
1:26

COMING UP TODAY On Going Rogue with Lara Logan Lara Logan sits down with Peter Mcilvenna, a UK-based journalist, researcher, and former political and ministry insider, for a serious and wide-ranging conversation on a subject few are willing to address openly. This episode examines concerns about political influence operations tied to certain Islamist factions and how those efforts are unfolding inside the United States, with a focus on developments in Michigan, Texas, and beyond. This is a challenging and sensitive discussion grounded in reporting, research, and firsthand experience. The goal is understanding what is happening, how it is happening, and why it matters now. Going Rogue With Lara Logan | EP. 59 Hearts of Oak Available today on Spotify, X, YouTube, Rumble, Podbean, Apple Podcasts, and major platforms. #LaraLogan #GoingRogue #InvestigativeJournalism #CurrentEvents #Marxism

Lara Logan

30,592 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten