Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Unfortunately some times we may lost some material inside the patient. it is better to know in advance which snares are available, how snare works, which snare for which problem and also how to make a customized snare for any different anatomy PCRonline 🫀 European Society of Cardiology #EAPCI...

15,633 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Jev + SERV is actually insane. We already showed you can increase Jev's performance with SERV Reasoning. Now we're taking it further, bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with the upcoming SERV v3. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Jev is a decision-making model. Given a task and a set of options, it predicts which path is more likely. Think of the octopus that predicted World Cup results. Jev does that for your business, except it's not luck. It weighs every option and tells you how sure it is. It does this by assigning probabilities to outcomes. It doesn't generate text on its own, so you can't expect it to create a new outcome for you. But that's also what enables it to be lightning fast and dirt cheap. For example, in customer service you can ask Jev how to triage an incoming query and route it to the correct department. It can only select from the list of departments you provide it. This also means it can't hallucinate a new outcome outside the options it's given, which makes it incredibly interesting for OpenServ. In Graph Sharding, we take a single system prompt and break it down into multiple LLM steps with deterministic input and output shapes. Some of these steps require an LLM to produce new output, while others are simply decision routers that determine the next possible path. Traditionally, LLMs are slow and expensive. Breaking a single prompt into multiple steps increases accuracy and reliability by a ton, but it also introduces latency. Jev takes on those decision nodes, which are the backbone of a business process and therefore SERV graphs, and makes them super consistent and lightning fast, lowering the overall cost and latency of graph execution. SERV Reasoning on its own is a great force multiplier for Jev because, like all other models, it works by interpreting input instructions. The clearer those instructions are, the better the model performs. That's where SERV Reasoning comes into play. Just like amplifying any other model, we also amplify the accuracy and consistency of Jev's responses. And now we're bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with SERV v3.

Armagan Amcalar

365,108 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Recently there was increased discussion about DMCA takedown requests being used in bad faith between competitors on Shopify. I can confirm that the volume of these has very much increased recently. Let me give you some examples of what we are doing about it. Our goal is to work within the DMCA’s framework and make a system in which the right things happen quickly. We want to give merchants the maximum time to respond with the minimum disruption. We also need legitimate claims to resolve in favor of the claimants quickly. The first thing we did recently is to productize this properly. We shipped a feature to manage these cases directly in the Shopify admin to make it a lot more obvious. Before that a lot was managed through form emails. This process is now much simpler and faster. The second thing we did is to make the identity system more robust so that we know more about the claims filed. We consider the claimants previous cases in order to decide what decisions to take. Similarly we consider documentation from previous cases that merchants had to deal with more strongly to make accurate decisions when repeat claims are received against products. If we detect bad faith claims from accounts we take action. We recently filed multiple lawsuits against claimants in court. This matches our aggressive stance when we see frivolous or bad faith patent action in which we had a lot of success invalidating bad patents. The end result of this is that we catch spammy or frivolous claims at much higher frequency already. We also make responding to cases much easier and this can be managed directly from the admin now and is less work for the merchants. Lots of additional improvements coming- but what I can guarantee you is that that Shopify will be the worst platform on which to make fraudulent DMCA claims on. “Be merchant obsessed” is a core value here, and we reflect that better in this area.

tobi lutke

142,265 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren