Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 "UNPRECEDENTED SIDE EFFECTS" Press Conference from Japan's "Vaccine Issues Study Group", January 11, 2024. ---Highlights--- Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima from Kyoto University: A systematic review of the literature has revealed some surprising facts. Thousands of papers have reported side effects after vaccination, which affect every organ without exception....

_aussie17's profile picture

aussie17

95,521 subscribers

1,675,140 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля aussie17
aussie172 лет назад

Write up & Full subtitled press conference here

Фото профиля aussie17
aussie172 лет назад

ORIGINAL SOURCE from @JINKOUZOUKA_jp

Фото профиля aussie17
aussie172 лет назад

here comes the community notes

Фото профиля aussie17
aussie172 лет назад

Related

Фото профиля aussie17
aussie172 лет назад

Portuguese sub

Фото профиля Frank Davis
Frank Davis2 лет назад

“Vaccine centers, it’s like a cult”

Фото профиля Tres Leches
Tres Leches2 лет назад

How holy do the moly's have to get before we see some response by authorities?! We are already beyond the beyond

Фото профиля Nashville Angela
Nashville Angela2 лет назад

“ For example, the age-adjusted mortality rate for leukemia has increased. And there are significant findings for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and so on”

Фото профиля Nashville Angela
Nashville Angela2 лет назад

Year five will be awful!

Фото профиля David Procino
David Procino2 лет назад

@BaizuoBu Pfizer and Moderna stock prices acting like the equity markets version of vaccine failure

Похожие видео

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish
22:25

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,416 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."
2:19

"[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."

Sense Receptor

33,743 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Japanese Press Conference 18 September 2025 Six officials from Japan's Ministry of Health attended a press conference hosted by the Japan Vaccine Issues Research Association regarding messenger RNA vaccines. 💥Request for mRNA vaccine cancellation and market recall submitted to the Ministry of Health 💥Oncologist Prof Fukushima: "It is a novel gene therapy drug. Substantively, it is a gene therapy drug. This gene, in this stable form of messenger RNA, is introduced into the body. When cells take it up, what happens is that it gets incorporated into the nucleus and integrated into the DNA" .... "In cancer patients’ tissues, it gets incorporated, or it may even promote cancer growth or carcinogenesis—we don’t know. There are so many unknowns, and now with this disease, I strongly emphasized to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare officials that this is new, If things we’ve never seen before are happening now, we must face them properly and shine the light of science on them." ... "we’re only now starting to grasp the full scope, but regarding the benefits, we still don’t know much. It’s not just about papers—there are papers, but in reality, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people prospectively to see how many are hospitalized or how many die—when you look at the deaths, even setting aside vaccine-related deaths, it’s strange that more vaccinated people die from COVID." .... "Vaccines—in other words, the influenza vaccine—is unnecessary. The COVID vaccine isn’t needed either. We’ve been brainwashed into this vaccine craze, and whether we can break free from that is the question."
13:15

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Japanese Press Conference 18 September 2025 Six officials from Japan's Ministry of Health attended a press conference hosted by the Japan Vaccine Issues Research Association regarding messenger RNA vaccines. 💥Request for mRNA vaccine cancellation and market recall submitted to the Ministry of Health 💥Oncologist Prof Fukushima: "It is a novel gene therapy drug. Substantively, it is a gene therapy drug. This gene, in this stable form of messenger RNA, is introduced into the body. When cells take it up, what happens is that it gets incorporated into the nucleus and integrated into the DNA" .... "In cancer patients’ tissues, it gets incorporated, or it may even promote cancer growth or carcinogenesis—we don’t know. There are so many unknowns, and now with this disease, I strongly emphasized to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare officials that this is new, If things we’ve never seen before are happening now, we must face them properly and shine the light of science on them." ... "we’re only now starting to grasp the full scope, but regarding the benefits, we still don’t know much. It’s not just about papers—there are papers, but in reality, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people prospectively to see how many are hospitalized or how many die—when you look at the deaths, even setting aside vaccine-related deaths, it’s strange that more vaccinated people die from COVID." .... "Vaccines—in other words, the influenza vaccine—is unnecessary. The COVID vaccine isn’t needed either. We’ve been brainwashed into this vaccine craze, and whether we can break free from that is the question."

aussie17

122,500 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Amazing speech by Del Bigtree: "I just want to state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of 99 million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders. And it adds on to the title but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way to describe the injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord. This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together? Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three-shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot. And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the V-safe app to track the health outcomes of the first 10 million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest. These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Kawasaki's disease, multi-system inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare. And since we know that the rare is currently being described, at least in this study, as anything between a 200% increase to a nearly 700% increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine? Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANN's work, since the end of 2016 when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths. Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72 doses, was ever put through a long-term double-blind placebo-based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe. We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis B vaccines and RxB. Here are the side effects. Herpes zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, atheralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis neuritis, hyposthesia, peristhesia, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paralysis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma-like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. That's just one vaccine. That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis B vaccine was only four days long. and had no placebo comparator. That is not science, that's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18. The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we have been saying for years. Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 act, and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53 doses, as I said, 72, that's 53 shots, 72 doses. You watched the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocketed to 54% of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you are looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health and human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study. Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vax versus unvaxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in 45. That's conservative. Many say one in 35 children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in 20 to 24 boys. Is that still rare? Sure, sure, it's just a couple per 100. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here, right? Nothing to see here."
7:58

Amazing speech by Del Bigtree: "I just want to state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of 99 million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders. And it adds on to the title but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way to describe the injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord. This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together? Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three-shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot. And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the V-safe app to track the health outcomes of the first 10 million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest. These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Kawasaki's disease, multi-system inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare. And since we know that the rare is currently being described, at least in this study, as anything between a 200% increase to a nearly 700% increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine? Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANN's work, since the end of 2016 when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths. Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72 doses, was ever put through a long-term double-blind placebo-based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe. We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis B vaccines and RxB. Here are the side effects. Herpes zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, atheralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis neuritis, hyposthesia, peristhesia, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paralysis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma-like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. That's just one vaccine. That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis B vaccine was only four days long. and had no placebo comparator. That is not science, that's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18. The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we have been saying for years. Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 act, and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53 doses, as I said, 72, that's 53 shots, 72 doses. You watched the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocketed to 54% of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you are looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health and human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study. Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vax versus unvaxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in 45. That's conservative. Many say one in 35 children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in 20 to 24 boys. Is that still rare? Sure, sure, it's just a couple per 100. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here, right? Nothing to see here."

Camus

682,937 просмотров • 1 год назад

Prof. Fukushima at Press Conference. (No.1) "This is not drug harm. To be clear, the vaccine is not a drug, but a bioweapon with all kinds of toxicity. So many people have died because of distribution of the bioweapon. It's a massacre. It's a Holocaust." Prof. Fukushima’s statement: I am the President of the Study Group on Vaccine Problems (The official Name of the Study Group is Japanese Society for Vaccine-related Complication (JSVRC)). As a doctor and as a scientist, I am gravely aware that we are facing a tremendous crisis right now. I could say that this crisis has just begun. This is a crisis of democracy.The people's right to access information is completely undermined. The government adopts a shameless attitude to keep totally disregarding the basic human rights such as the right to pursue happiness, and the right to live that are protected under the Japanese Constitution. This is absolutely unacceptable! Honest scholars have been documented numerous cases of vaccine-related harms and injuries etc., at their academic conferences. The number of reported vaccine harms is 'many hundreds’. This is not just an unusual situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. What vaccines are causing are not drug-related harms. Totally incomplete substance called a nucleic acid medicine, which is in fact not even a medicine, was distributed to the public. So what happened as a result? I dare say, "Murder." We could say that a massacre has occurred. This is more like a holocaust caused by a bioweapon. Something very sloppy and half baked has been released into the world. Trillions of public money was wasted on such a half-baked product. We will address the post-vaccination syndrome which is classified as ’Adverse drug reaction’ according to the international classification. It is high time to deliver appropriate medical care to patients affected by post-vaccination syndrome in a truly serious manner. Immediately, all doctors, all scientists, need to face this huge problem.
2:11

Prof. Fukushima at Press Conference. (No.1) "This is not drug harm. To be clear, the vaccine is not a drug, but a bioweapon with all kinds of toxicity. So many people have died because of distribution of the bioweapon. It's a massacre. It's a Holocaust." Prof. Fukushima’s statement: I am the President of the Study Group on Vaccine Problems (The official Name of the Study Group is Japanese Society for Vaccine-related Complication (JSVRC)). As a doctor and as a scientist, I am gravely aware that we are facing a tremendous crisis right now. I could say that this crisis has just begun. This is a crisis of democracy.The people's right to access information is completely undermined. The government adopts a shameless attitude to keep totally disregarding the basic human rights such as the right to pursue happiness, and the right to live that are protected under the Japanese Constitution. This is absolutely unacceptable! Honest scholars have been documented numerous cases of vaccine-related harms and injuries etc., at their academic conferences. The number of reported vaccine harms is 'many hundreds’. This is not just an unusual situation. Nothing like this has ever happened before. What vaccines are causing are not drug-related harms. Totally incomplete substance called a nucleic acid medicine, which is in fact not even a medicine, was distributed to the public. So what happened as a result? I dare say, "Murder." We could say that a massacre has occurred. This is more like a holocaust caused by a bioweapon. Something very sloppy and half baked has been released into the world. Trillions of public money was wasted on such a half-baked product. We will address the post-vaccination syndrome which is classified as ’Adverse drug reaction’ according to the international classification. It is high time to deliver appropriate medical care to patients affected by post-vaccination syndrome in a truly serious manner. Immediately, all doctors, all scientists, need to face this huge problem.

You

1,069,137 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Powerful testimony by Del Bigtree "I just wanna state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of ninety nine million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small, increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders." "And it adds on to the title, but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way, described injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord." "This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91 x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together?" "Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot." "And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the v safe app, app to track the health outcomes of the first ten million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest." "These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain Barre syndrome, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare." "And since we know that the rare is currently being being described, at least in this study, as anything between a two hundred percent increase to a nearly seven hundred percent increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine?" "Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANS, work since the February when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths." "Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72, was ever put through a long term, double blind, placebo based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe." "We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis b vaccines, Engerix b." "Here are the side effects. Herp b zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, arthralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, Guillain Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paresis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens Johnson Syndrome. That's just one vaccine." "That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis b vaccine was only four days long and had no placebo comparator. That is not science." "That's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18? The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we've been saying for years." "Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the nineteen eighties, when we were giving 11 of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was twelve point eight percent." "Once we passed the 1986 act and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53. As I said, seventy two that's fifty three shots, seventy two doses. You watch the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocket to fifty four percent of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We had have no idea since then how bad this has gotten." "But what you were looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health in human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study." "Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vaxxed versus unvaxxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in forty five. That's conservative. Many say one in thirty five children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in twenty to twenty four boys. Is that still rare? Sure. Sure." "It's just a couple per one hundred. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here. Right? Nothing to see here."
7:58

Powerful testimony by Del Bigtree "I just wanna state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of ninety nine million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small, increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders." "And it adds on to the title, but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way, described injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord." "This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91 x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together?" "Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot." "And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the v safe app, app to track the health outcomes of the first ten million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest." "These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain Barre syndrome, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare." "And since we know that the rare is currently being being described, at least in this study, as anything between a two hundred percent increase to a nearly seven hundred percent increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine?" "Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANS, work since the February when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths." "Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72, was ever put through a long term, double blind, placebo based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe." "We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis b vaccines, Engerix b." "Here are the side effects. Herp b zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, arthralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis, hypoesthesia, paresthesia, Guillain Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paresis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens Johnson Syndrome. That's just one vaccine." "That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis b vaccine was only four days long and had no placebo comparator. That is not science." "That's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18? The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we've been saying for years." "Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the nineteen eighties, when we were giving 11 of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was twelve point eight percent." "Once we passed the 1986 act and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53. As I said, seventy two that's fifty three shots, seventy two doses. You watch the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocket to fifty four percent of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We had have no idea since then how bad this has gotten." "But what you were looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health in human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study." "Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vaxxed versus unvaxxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in forty five. That's conservative. Many say one in thirty five children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in twenty to twenty four boys. Is that still rare? Sure. Sure." "It's just a couple per one hundred. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here. Right? Nothing to see here."

Camus

46,196 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 A Message from Japan to the world! Please share and distribute! Thank you very much for giving me this valuable opportunity to send my message about human rights abuse in the time of COVID-19. My name is Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. My specialty is Molecular Pathology and Medicine. The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop vaccines, which usually takes longer than ten years to less than one year. Operation Warp Speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconceptions of the genetic vaccines. Under the pretext of saving time, an extremely dangerous method was selected. That is, intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spike proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system. Because this is a completely new method and misconceived method that has never applied before in human history, it is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines, 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated. Unfortunately, seven shots have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world. And the result was the induction of the terrible drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy people, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takemi, Japanese Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without learning from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable, crazy situation. The Japanese government is first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication replicon vaccine, and plans to start to supply it in this fall and winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project. And factories to produce new vaccines are being built one after another in Japan. I visited these factories directly. Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900 million from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by Disease X proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation's 100 days mission, which aims to shorten the time to one third of Operation Warp Speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in hundreds of days. This is possible only by ignoring the human rights perspective. Amendments to the WHO, International Health Regulation (IHR), and the so called Pandemic Treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health assembly this year, are attempting to give rationality and legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous crazy plans. If such things continue, there is high risk that Japan made vaccines will be exported under the guise for false trust. If Japan were to become a vaccine perpetrator, it would leave irreparable harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government MUST BE STOPPED by international collaborations. Although it has already been three years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every day. Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book with the last version of speech and published a book with a title "Withdraw From WHO" It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when Disease X occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time in order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries. I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, we can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.
8:34

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 A Message from Japan to the world! Please share and distribute! Thank you very much for giving me this valuable opportunity to send my message about human rights abuse in the time of COVID-19. My name is Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. My specialty is Molecular Pathology and Medicine. The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop vaccines, which usually takes longer than ten years to less than one year. Operation Warp Speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconceptions of the genetic vaccines. Under the pretext of saving time, an extremely dangerous method was selected. That is, intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spike proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system. Because this is a completely new method and misconceived method that has never applied before in human history, it is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines, 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated. Unfortunately, seven shots have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world. And the result was the induction of the terrible drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy people, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takemi, Japanese Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without learning from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable, crazy situation. The Japanese government is first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication replicon vaccine, and plans to start to supply it in this fall and winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project. And factories to produce new vaccines are being built one after another in Japan. I visited these factories directly. Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900 million from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by Disease X proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation's 100 days mission, which aims to shorten the time to one third of Operation Warp Speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in hundreds of days. This is possible only by ignoring the human rights perspective. Amendments to the WHO, International Health Regulation (IHR), and the so called Pandemic Treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health assembly this year, are attempting to give rationality and legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous crazy plans. If such things continue, there is high risk that Japan made vaccines will be exported under the guise for false trust. If Japan were to become a vaccine perpetrator, it would leave irreparable harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government MUST BE STOPPED by international collaborations. Although it has already been three years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every day. Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book with the last version of speech and published a book with a title "Withdraw From WHO" It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when Disease X occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time in order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries. I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, we can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.

aussie17

515,506 просмотров • 2 лет назад

RFK Jr. clarifies his stance on vaccines with this amazing presentation: "Since I decided to run as an independent candidate for the presidency, one of the issues people seem most confused about is my position on vaccines. So today I'm gonna set the record straight by explaining my exact posture point by point. If you're willing to take a few minutes, I think you might be surprised to find out how much we actually agree." "So let's begin with my first point, which is probably the most controversial. Vaccines have side effects just like every other drug. This shouldn't be controversial, but it is. When I'm asked about this on television, it usually sounds something like this. You said that no vaccine is safe and effective. You said, quote, there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. Do you still believe that? That statement comes from an interview where I was interrupted and I didn't get to complete my thought." "Can you name any vaccines that you think are good? I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably saw averting more problems than they're causing. There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. The big words. What I was actually saying that interview and what I've said for 20 years is that there is no such thing as a vaccine that is safe and effective for everyone. Let me explain." "Just like every drug on the market, vaccines have side effects that severely injure and kill some people every year. If that's in contrast to what you've been told, then your doctor probably never showed you the warning sheet that comes with every vaccine on the market. This is the insert that comes in the box with the hepatitis B vaccine, which is injected into most babies. within 24 hours of birth." "Let me read you just a few of the serious side effects in this document. Under the heading of nervous system disorders, it says Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, including vellus palsy, radiculopathy, herpes, eye grain, muscle weakness, hypesthesia, and encephalitis, just swelling of the brain, even Johnson's syndrome, alopecia, and eczema. A list of side effects goes on and on. You got the idea." "For over a decade, I've been attacked and labeled an anti-vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist for simply drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert and for advocating that the children who are suffering from these side effects. Our health departments believe we shouldn't talk about vaccine injuries because they are rare, but I don't agree with that. We can't fix a problem by ignoring it." "Vaccine-injured children deserve just as much attention as a child with a rare disease like cancer. Luckily, the thinking on this is starting to change. Here's a recent New York Times article about people who have been injured by the COVID vaccine. Thousands believe that COVID vaccines harm them. Is anyone listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects, but people who say they were injured by COVID vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. The article explains that all vaccines do have occasional side effects." "It calls for an investigation of the injured so that we can come up with solutions. Even one of the heads of the COVID task force, Dr. Deborah Birx, is joining this call for action. Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions, because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. There's been so much credibility lost in the public science groups, NIH, FDA, CDC, because I think there was a lack of really just transparency." "One of the things I used to tell my colleagues, don't be afraid to say you don't know the answer. And all too often, people would make up the answer. Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines, we kind of like with the rest of your show that you had early on, we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines because they were afraid that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated. For years, we've been told that vaccines have been studied extensively, but Dr. Birx knows this is not true." "Should she be called an anti-vaxxer for finally telling us the truth? Back in 2005, Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former head of NIH, the National Institute for Health, made this shocking admission to CBS News. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible. to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury." "Why is this important? A susceptible group does not mean that vaccines aren't good. What a susceptible group will tell us is that maybe there is a group of individuals or a group of children that shouldn't have a particular vaccine or shouldn't have vaccine on the same schedule. It is the job of the public health community and of physicians. to be out there and to say, yes, we can make it safer because we are able to say, this is a subset." "We're gonna deliver it in a way that we think is safer. Do you feel the government was too quick to dismiss out of hand that there was this possibility of a link between vaccines and autism? I think the government or certain public health officials in the government have been too quick to dismiss the concerns of these families without studying the population that got sick. I haven't seen. major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine." "The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that would scare the public away. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can say hello to your children. I'm going to usher in a new era in medicine." "I'm going to make sure that our regulatory agencies stop putting the interests of the pharmaceutical industry above the interests of the American people. I'm going to make sure that you are told the truth about every product, and that includes all the benefits and all the side effects that they know about." "And I'm going to fund our regulatory agencies to fix the problem instead of ignoring them and I'm going to stop them from gaslighting and silencing the scientists, the physicians, and the individuals who want to talk about vaccine injuries. That leads me to my next point. Vaccine makers should be legally responsible for their products and surprisingly they're not." "Let me explain. In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury caused by their vaccines that they couldn't make a profit. So they asked our government to protect them from liability, and that's what Congress did. It passed the so-called 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, and as a result of that bill, vaccines are the only consumer product that are completely shielded from liability." "That means no matter how reckless the company behaves, no matter how negligent they are, no matter how grievous your injury, you can't sue them. So let me ask you this, if a company can't be sued when their product injures or kills somebody, what incentive do they have to fix it? As an attorney, I can assure you that once a company knows that they can be sued when their product is defective, they work much harder to fix the issue themselves." "By repealing the 1986 act, we can replace regulation with responsibility and accountability. And my last point is this, freedom means having the right to choose. When President Biden passed the mandate during the pandemic to take away people's jobs if they did not submit to the COVID vaccine, he violated one of the central principles of freedom. Four million more people. got their first shot in August than they did in July. But we need to do more." "This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. If a person does not have the final decision of their own bodies, and they are owned by whoever does, this was the central discussion during the trials of the doctors who committed war crimes during World War II that resulted in the passage of the Nuremberg Code." "The very first rule of that code is called informed consent. It states, quote, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Any use of force or coercion to inspire a medical decision is considered unethical. Americans today are reawakening to the critical importance of Nuremberg code. Currently, over 75% of Americans who are eligible are refusing to take the latest COVID booster." "For some, this would be their ninth shot. They've done their research. They've decided that they've had enough. That's called informed consent. Pfizer and Moderna are currently lobbying our government to mandate every shot, just like the first one. If this passes, you can be assured that we will be lined up like cattle and mandated to take every shot just like we were the first time." "American children are required to take 72 vaccines just to stay in school. Should that be the fate of adults too? That will never happen when I'm president. So to sum it all up, despite what you may have heard, I'm not going to take away anybody's vaccine who wants a vaccine. I'm just going to make them safer for everyone." "I'm going to make sure that the industry is responsible for their products. And I'm going to make sure that you are always free to choose what's right for you. If you agree with me, then go to to see what other changes I'm going to make when I'm the president."
11:17

RFK Jr. clarifies his stance on vaccines with this amazing presentation: "Since I decided to run as an independent candidate for the presidency, one of the issues people seem most confused about is my position on vaccines. So today I'm gonna set the record straight by explaining my exact posture point by point. If you're willing to take a few minutes, I think you might be surprised to find out how much we actually agree." "So let's begin with my first point, which is probably the most controversial. Vaccines have side effects just like every other drug. This shouldn't be controversial, but it is. When I'm asked about this on television, it usually sounds something like this. You said that no vaccine is safe and effective. You said, quote, there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. Do you still believe that? That statement comes from an interview where I was interrupted and I didn't get to complete my thought." "Can you name any vaccines that you think are good? I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably saw averting more problems than they're causing. There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective. The big words. What I was actually saying that interview and what I've said for 20 years is that there is no such thing as a vaccine that is safe and effective for everyone. Let me explain." "Just like every drug on the market, vaccines have side effects that severely injure and kill some people every year. If that's in contrast to what you've been told, then your doctor probably never showed you the warning sheet that comes with every vaccine on the market. This is the insert that comes in the box with the hepatitis B vaccine, which is injected into most babies. within 24 hours of birth." "Let me read you just a few of the serious side effects in this document. Under the heading of nervous system disorders, it says Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, exacerbation of multiple sclerosis, myelitis, including transverse myelitis, seizure, febrile seizure, peripheral neuropathy, including vellus palsy, radiculopathy, herpes, eye grain, muscle weakness, hypesthesia, and encephalitis, just swelling of the brain, even Johnson's syndrome, alopecia, and eczema. A list of side effects goes on and on. You got the idea." "For over a decade, I've been attacked and labeled an anti-vaxxer and a conspiracy theorist for simply drawing attention to the serious side effects listed on every vaccine insert and for advocating that the children who are suffering from these side effects. Our health departments believe we shouldn't talk about vaccine injuries because they are rare, but I don't agree with that. We can't fix a problem by ignoring it." "Vaccine-injured children deserve just as much attention as a child with a rare disease like cancer. Luckily, the thinking on this is starting to change. Here's a recent New York Times article about people who have been injured by the COVID vaccine. Thousands believe that COVID vaccines harm them. Is anyone listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects, but people who say they were injured by COVID vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. The article explains that all vaccines do have occasional side effects." "It calls for an investigation of the injured so that we can come up with solutions. Even one of the heads of the COVID task force, Dr. Deborah Birx, is joining this call for action. Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions, because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. There's been so much credibility lost in the public science groups, NIH, FDA, CDC, because I think there was a lack of really just transparency." "One of the things I used to tell my colleagues, don't be afraid to say you don't know the answer. And all too often, people would make up the answer. Those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines, we kind of like with the rest of your show that you had early on, we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines because they were afraid that would cause people not to want to get vaccinated. For years, we've been told that vaccines have been studied extensively, but Dr. Birx knows this is not true." "Should she be called an anti-vaxxer for finally telling us the truth? Back in 2005, Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former head of NIH, the National Institute for Health, made this shocking admission to CBS News. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue, that makes them more susceptible. to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of vaccine like mercury." "Why is this important? A susceptible group does not mean that vaccines aren't good. What a susceptible group will tell us is that maybe there is a group of individuals or a group of children that shouldn't have a particular vaccine or shouldn't have vaccine on the same schedule. It is the job of the public health community and of physicians. to be out there and to say, yes, we can make it safer because we are able to say, this is a subset." "We're gonna deliver it in a way that we think is safer. Do you feel the government was too quick to dismiss out of hand that there was this possibility of a link between vaccines and autism? I think the government or certain public health officials in the government have been too quick to dismiss the concerns of these families without studying the population that got sick. I haven't seen. major studies that focus on 300 kids who got autistic symptoms within a period of a few weeks of a vaccine." "The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they were afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that would scare the public away. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can say hello to your children. I'm going to usher in a new era in medicine." "I'm going to make sure that our regulatory agencies stop putting the interests of the pharmaceutical industry above the interests of the American people. I'm going to make sure that you are told the truth about every product, and that includes all the benefits and all the side effects that they know about." "And I'm going to fund our regulatory agencies to fix the problem instead of ignoring them and I'm going to stop them from gaslighting and silencing the scientists, the physicians, and the individuals who want to talk about vaccine injuries. That leads me to my next point. Vaccine makers should be legally responsible for their products and surprisingly they're not." "Let me explain. In 1986, vaccine manufacturers were losing so much money from lawsuits for death and injury caused by their vaccines that they couldn't make a profit. So they asked our government to protect them from liability, and that's what Congress did. It passed the so-called 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, and as a result of that bill, vaccines are the only consumer product that are completely shielded from liability." "That means no matter how reckless the company behaves, no matter how negligent they are, no matter how grievous your injury, you can't sue them. So let me ask you this, if a company can't be sued when their product injures or kills somebody, what incentive do they have to fix it? As an attorney, I can assure you that once a company knows that they can be sued when their product is defective, they work much harder to fix the issue themselves." "By repealing the 1986 act, we can replace regulation with responsibility and accountability. And my last point is this, freedom means having the right to choose. When President Biden passed the mandate during the pandemic to take away people's jobs if they did not submit to the COVID vaccine, he violated one of the central principles of freedom. Four million more people. got their first shot in August than they did in July. But we need to do more." "This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. If a person does not have the final decision of their own bodies, and they are owned by whoever does, this was the central discussion during the trials of the doctors who committed war crimes during World War II that resulted in the passage of the Nuremberg Code." "The very first rule of that code is called informed consent. It states, quote, the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Any use of force or coercion to inspire a medical decision is considered unethical. Americans today are reawakening to the critical importance of Nuremberg code. Currently, over 75% of Americans who are eligible are refusing to take the latest COVID booster." "For some, this would be their ninth shot. They've done their research. They've decided that they've had enough. That's called informed consent. Pfizer and Moderna are currently lobbying our government to mandate every shot, just like the first one. If this passes, you can be assured that we will be lined up like cattle and mandated to take every shot just like we were the first time." "American children are required to take 72 vaccines just to stay in school. Should that be the fate of adults too? That will never happen when I'm president. So to sum it all up, despite what you may have heard, I'm not going to take away anybody's vaccine who wants a vaccine. I'm just going to make them safer for everyone." "I'm going to make sure that the industry is responsible for their products. And I'm going to make sure that you are always free to choose what's right for you. If you agree with me, then go to to see what other changes I'm going to make when I'm the president."

Camus

989,222 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”
1:14

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,777,440 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨Legendary Japanese news anchor Oishi from CBC 大石邦彦のNOW ON SHARE! continues to share vaccine inflicted harms and asking why the Japanese Gov is not taking any actions. Highlights---- Reported cases of suspected side effects after vaccination. It has exceeded 36,000 cases. 36,000 cases! There are many types of reported side effects, and they are occurring throughout the body. ... Now, let's look at the reported cases of suspected deaths after vaccination. There have been 2,168 cases. .... Among the people who have died, many reports indicate damage to the heart and brain. .... Despite the high number of deaths in Japan, vaccination has continued as "there is no serious concern" .... What exactly does "serious concern" mean as defined by the government? How many deaths after vaccination would it take to become a "serious concern"? ------ His news reports is also now available in English Dub on their youtube channel (link below) H/T: MiSolLaDo
3:41

🚨🚨Legendary Japanese news anchor Oishi from CBC 大石邦彦のNOW ON SHARE! continues to share vaccine inflicted harms and asking why the Japanese Gov is not taking any actions. Highlights---- Reported cases of suspected side effects after vaccination. It has exceeded 36,000 cases. 36,000 cases! There are many types of reported side effects, and they are occurring throughout the body. ... Now, let's look at the reported cases of suspected deaths after vaccination. There have been 2,168 cases. .... Among the people who have died, many reports indicate damage to the heart and brain. .... Despite the high number of deaths in Japan, vaccination has continued as "there is no serious concern" .... What exactly does "serious concern" mean as defined by the government? How many deaths after vaccination would it take to become a "serious concern"? ------ His news reports is also now available in English Dub on their youtube channel (link below) H/T: MiSolLaDo

aussie17

56,201 просмотров • 2 лет назад

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.
4:38

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

aussie17

440,071 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 🚨 🚨 Marcel de Graaff, member of the European Parliament, tells of the shocking facts about the Covid19 shots found in a response from the European Medicines Agency. Marcel is talking here about the Dutch government, but I edited the original video to make it even more relevant to New Zealand. Watch, and you'll see. There are English subtitles, but here is most of what is said. I realise it's a long read, but please do read it. The EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunisations. And absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else Not only did the EMA not allow the vaccines at all to go against infections, the EMA goes even further. It explains in its answer, and I quote "The EMA's assessment reports on the admission of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on contagiousness" In other words, the vaccines were not intended to prevent infections and there are no data at all that substantiates that the vaccines help against infections. In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself, to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized, but also completely nonsense and not based on facts. The EMA says that the vaccines are only for the protection of the vaccinated individual. And before the individual, the patient, is vaccinated, all safety information must, and I quote the EMA again, "Be taken into account when administering or recommending a vaccination". So you were only allowed to make a recommendation for a vaccination after a doctor had determined that this was sensible in your case. And because almost no one under the age of 60 had a chance of serious complications due to the coronavirus, no one, but also no one under the age of 60 should be vaccinated after a single exception. So the sports halls full of vaccine prickers were completely in conflict with the use of which the vaccines had been administered by the EMA. To assess the safety of the vaccines, it was essential for the EMA that side effects would be properly registered. And the EMA says about this, we expect many reports of side effects that occur during or shortly after vaccination. And that means that the complaints must be reported especially in the first period immediately following vaccination. The government supported a policy in which these complaints were not reported the first 14 days after vaccination, because the vaccine would need 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were written to the coronavirus, and that is not only fraudulent, but that is deliberately endangering people's lives. And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines to our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe. And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud. And please retweet! Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr Aseem Malhotra Neil Oliver Andrew Bridgen Matt Le Tissier ✝️ Winston Peters NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science #VaccineInjuries #VaccineDeaths #mRNA #ExcessDeaths
7:59

🚨 🚨 🚨 Marcel de Graaff, member of the European Parliament, tells of the shocking facts about the Covid19 shots found in a response from the European Medicines Agency. Marcel is talking here about the Dutch government, but I edited the original video to make it even more relevant to New Zealand. Watch, and you'll see. There are English subtitles, but here is most of what is said. I realise it's a long read, but please do read it. The EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunisations. And absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else Not only did the EMA not allow the vaccines at all to go against infections, the EMA goes even further. It explains in its answer, and I quote "The EMA's assessment reports on the admission of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on contagiousness" In other words, the vaccines were not intended to prevent infections and there are no data at all that substantiates that the vaccines help against infections. In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself, to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized, but also completely nonsense and not based on facts. The EMA says that the vaccines are only for the protection of the vaccinated individual. And before the individual, the patient, is vaccinated, all safety information must, and I quote the EMA again, "Be taken into account when administering or recommending a vaccination". So you were only allowed to make a recommendation for a vaccination after a doctor had determined that this was sensible in your case. And because almost no one under the age of 60 had a chance of serious complications due to the coronavirus, no one, but also no one under the age of 60 should be vaccinated after a single exception. So the sports halls full of vaccine prickers were completely in conflict with the use of which the vaccines had been administered by the EMA. To assess the safety of the vaccines, it was essential for the EMA that side effects would be properly registered. And the EMA says about this, we expect many reports of side effects that occur during or shortly after vaccination. And that means that the complaints must be reported especially in the first period immediately following vaccination. The government supported a policy in which these complaints were not reported the first 14 days after vaccination, because the vaccine would need 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were written to the coronavirus, and that is not only fraudulent, but that is deliberately endangering people's lives. And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines to our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe. And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud. And please retweet! Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr Aseem Malhotra Neil Oliver Andrew Bridgen Matt Le Tissier ✝️ Winston Peters NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science #VaccineInjuries #VaccineDeaths #mRNA #ExcessDeaths

Coronavirus Plushie

146,788 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Lead HPV Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night” Dr. Diane Harper was a lead researcher in Merck's Gardasil clinical trials. Also a practicing OB/GYN, she has a unique and invaluable perspective on the efficacy, safety, and social issues of HPV vaccines. ‘Gardasil and Cervarix don’t work, are dangerous, and weren’t tested. Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used. “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.” – Joan Robinson Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, over 69,000 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. “About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.” – Dr. Diane Harper One must understand how the establishment’s word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of “science”. When they report that untreated cases “can” lead to something that “may” lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of them being struck by a meteorite. Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills anyway?’
1:44

Lead HPV Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night” Dr. Diane Harper was a lead researcher in Merck's Gardasil clinical trials. Also a practicing OB/GYN, she has a unique and invaluable perspective on the efficacy, safety, and social issues of HPV vaccines. ‘Gardasil and Cervarix don’t work, are dangerous, and weren’t tested. Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used. “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all.” – Joan Robinson Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, over 69,000 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. “About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.” – Dr. Diane Harper One must understand how the establishment’s word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of “science”. When they report that untreated cases “can” lead to something that “may” lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of them being struck by a meteorite. Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills anyway?’

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

1,136,629 просмотров • 2 лет назад