Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨Unscripted: When the Truth Comes Full Circle During the Draft Process, we were fed the same recycled narrative. “No team wanted Shedeur Sanders.” “Anonymous insiders say 32 teams passed on him.” “Character concerns.” “System fit.” “Too much noise.” “Cocky. Brash. Arrogant.” Let’s pause right there, because even then, the...

DrAmyRucker's profile picture

Dr. Amy Rucker

1,169 subscribers

33,567 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Deion Sanders should be the next Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys. I was the first person to say it last year on the set of Monday Night Countdown when it wasn’t a popular opinion. Everyone wasn’t convinced at that time and THAT WAS OKAY. But I saw what Coach Prime was building at Colorado and when you know, you know. Now some of the same people who didn’t believe before, believe now. The difference is the Cowboys need Deion Sanders, but he doesn’t need them. Colorado is home and he built it. The only way they get him now, is if they Draft his sons Shedeur and Shilo Sanders.
3:34

Deion Sanders should be the next Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys. I was the first person to say it last year on the set of Monday Night Countdown when it wasn’t a popular opinion. Everyone wasn’t convinced at that time and THAT WAS OKAY. But I saw what Coach Prime was building at Colorado and when you know, you know. Now some of the same people who didn’t believe before, believe now. The difference is the Cowboys need Deion Sanders, but he doesn’t need them. Colorado is home and he built it. The only way they get him now, is if they Draft his sons Shedeur and Shilo Sanders.

Robert Griffin III

683,092 views • 1 year ago

Mark Cuban says he passed on Giannis Antetokounmpo in the 2013 NBA Draft out of respect for Dirk Nowitzki “When Giannis was getting drafted, we passed because we had Dirk. And this was 2013, we had just won the championship two years ago” “Some of our people wanted to go for Giannis. I wanted to trade down, and we ended up getting Shane Larkin, not so much because of Shane as a player, but we needed that cap room to go out and try to sign somebody to propel Dirk” “Remember, Giannis was coming out. I vividly remember there were two VHS tapes of him playing in the Greek league. That was all they had to show me... and it wasn't like every other team knew about him either” “But you have to respect Dirk. You have to respect what he's done for us. So, out of respect to Dirk, it was my final decision. We went for it, and we didn't get the free agents we wanted, but that was the plan”
1:26

Mark Cuban says he passed on Giannis Antetokounmpo in the 2013 NBA Draft out of respect for Dirk Nowitzki “When Giannis was getting drafted, we passed because we had Dirk. And this was 2013, we had just won the championship two years ago” “Some of our people wanted to go for Giannis. I wanted to trade down, and we ended up getting Shane Larkin, not so much because of Shane as a player, but we needed that cap room to go out and try to sign somebody to propel Dirk” “Remember, Giannis was coming out. I vividly remember there were two VHS tapes of him playing in the Greek league. That was all they had to show me... and it wasn't like every other team knew about him either” “But you have to respect Dirk. You have to respect what he's done for us. So, out of respect to Dirk, it was my final decision. We went for it, and we didn't get the free agents we wanted, but that was the plan”

dank

917,175 views • 14 days ago

Trump: All of the sudden he’s a big shot because he has the US on his side. Either we end it or let him fight it out and if he fights it out, it’s not going to be pretty because without us, he doesn’t win. You saw what I saw today. That was not a man who wanted to make peace
0:41

Trump: All of the sudden he’s a big shot because he has the US on his side. Either we end it or let him fight it out and if he fights it out, it’s not going to be pretty because without us, he doesn’t win. You saw what I saw today. That was not a man who wanted to make peace

Acyn

5,271,366 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 views • 3 months ago

Steph Curry’s favorite draft night memory was how loud New York fans booed when Golden State selected him at No. 7: “Well fun fact, not fun fact, horrible fact. That day was the day Michael Jackson passed away — June 25th, 2009. So I heard Jeff Teague tell this story on his pod the other day because we were in the same draft class, but it was my dad’s birthday, it was the day Michael Jackson passed. In New York, it was just the idea of being in the city getting dressed like, I did the old, it was like the premature ‘Get Ready With Me’ situations. When I had on my fit with a little purple tie, nervous is all I get out. But one, I didn’t know how long the night was going to be. And so you’re there for 2 hours before David Stern, at the time the commissioner, before he even walked out. And so, there were a lot of fans in there, a lot of New York fans, which is pretty awesome. My favorite moment is how loud they booed when Golden State selected me at No. 7. They booed like crazy and I’m trying to have that moment, but I couldn’t get that distraction out of my head. It’s like, ‘Are they booing?’ I was like, ‘Oh, no, they really wanted me. I got it. That took me a second.’ In that moment, there’s just so many thoughts going on. But getting that call from Larry Riley, the GM at the time, Don Nelson, who was the coach at the time. Getting that call and being like, ‘Hey, we’re looking forward to having you. I’m excited.’ And then me quickly looking at my phone trying to figure out exactly where Golden State was. It was like all I was thinking about was New York. But careful what you wish for. And I’m glad it went my way for sure.” (via Fudd Around and Find Out)
2:02

Steph Curry’s favorite draft night memory was how loud New York fans booed when Golden State selected him at No. 7: “Well fun fact, not fun fact, horrible fact. That day was the day Michael Jackson passed away — June 25th, 2009. So I heard Jeff Teague tell this story on his pod the other day because we were in the same draft class, but it was my dad’s birthday, it was the day Michael Jackson passed. In New York, it was just the idea of being in the city getting dressed like, I did the old, it was like the premature ‘Get Ready With Me’ situations. When I had on my fit with a little purple tie, nervous is all I get out. But one, I didn’t know how long the night was going to be. And so you’re there for 2 hours before David Stern, at the time the commissioner, before he even walked out. And so, there were a lot of fans in there, a lot of New York fans, which is pretty awesome. My favorite moment is how loud they booed when Golden State selected me at No. 7. They booed like crazy and I’m trying to have that moment, but I couldn’t get that distraction out of my head. It’s like, ‘Are they booing?’ I was like, ‘Oh, no, they really wanted me. I got it. That took me a second.’ In that moment, there’s just so many thoughts going on. But getting that call from Larry Riley, the GM at the time, Don Nelson, who was the coach at the time. Getting that call and being like, ‘Hey, we’re looking forward to having you. I’m excited.’ And then me quickly looking at my phone trying to figure out exactly where Golden State was. It was like all I was thinking about was New York. But careful what you wish for. And I’m glad it went my way for sure.” (via Fudd Around and Find Out)

aly ✶

288,563 views • 2 months ago

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”
5:57

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”

Gangster Cinema Central

88,340 views • 8 days ago

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)
2:14

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)

Gangster Cinema Central

97,458 views • 3 months ago

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 views • 7 months ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."
3:47

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

757,327 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Journalist Tom Pelissero details Shedeur Sanders' attitude issues, says an NFL coach told him that his interview with Sanders was the worst formal interview he ever had. Sanders also was allegedly dictating to teams "how he wanted things to go." The comment comes as many are accusing the NFL of being racist for not picking Sanders in the first 3 rounds. "Throughout the pre-draft process, Shedeur Sanders very much proceeded as if he was dictating to clubs where he was going to go rather than how the draft works, which is the other way around." "Some of his formal interviews did not go well. An assistant coach told me, in all his years, it was the worst formal interview he'd ever been through." "People said that Shedeur was trying to dictate how he wanted things to go and made them feel small." Video: Tom Pelissero
3:54

NEW: Journalist Tom Pelissero details Shedeur Sanders' attitude issues, says an NFL coach told him that his interview with Sanders was the worst formal interview he ever had. Sanders also was allegedly dictating to teams "how he wanted things to go." The comment comes as many are accusing the NFL of being racist for not picking Sanders in the first 3 rounds. "Throughout the pre-draft process, Shedeur Sanders very much proceeded as if he was dictating to clubs where he was going to go rather than how the draft works, which is the other way around." "Some of his formal interviews did not go well. An assistant coach told me, in all his years, it was the worst formal interview he'd ever been through." "People said that Shedeur was trying to dictate how he wanted things to go and made them feel small." Video: Tom Pelissero

Collin Rugg

1,631,184 views • 1 year ago

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”
1:44

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 views • 1 month ago

What an interesting voicemail left for Hank Brennan during the Karen Read trial from a former DOJ paralaegal! Transcript: Hi, Mr. Brennan, if this is your voicemail, you're not listed in the select by name directory, understandably, but especially now. You know, I'm a former paralegal at DOJ, but now living in Tennessee, retired because of a disability. And I just have to say, I'm so disappointed in you. I left a message that was actually pleasant for Mr. Lally at the end of the other trial, because I felt like he was kind of being forced to turn a blind eye, and may even be trying to intentionally lose, because he deep down has his own suspicions. Um, you must, or you are really not watching the entirety of the previous trial, but I want you to know that what you're saying today is in direct contradiction to your own former witness Brian Albert's testimony, where he said he let Chloe out right at that time because he knew that some experts may deduce that they are dog bites. And that was leaving open the possibility that she attacked John's body outside where it wasn't even there yet. But, but at that time, you know, when they later said that Karen hit him, um, You must know that there's ample reasonable doubt or you wouldn't be going after expert witnesses. And just as a Christian, I am a, you know, fairly astute former paralegal, but also as a Christian, you know, uh, you know, you're going to have to answer to a higher power. And right now I would like to go with you to see Chloe since you did, she takes the beer out and say, sick of myself. For her to bite either D.A. Morrissey or you, but somehow I still don't feel like that way toward Mr. Lally. Um, and then you'll have a comparison of exactly what her claw and bite marks look like. And what does it matter, which the doctor is not contradicting herself about, and it's misogynistic of you to suggest that she is. And like one person in the chat I've been watching, it said she would like to see you go after the ARCA experts, but apparently you really are, but you probably speak with more respect to them. But now you're going to have to say that they're from the FBI or hired by the FBI. So, either you know something that the FBI is being told to stand down because of the change in administration, or you're just not concerned about your own reputation if even I, the paralegal in Tennessee now, can, can see the ineptitude of what you're saying. You know, I'm just disappointed even for you to let yourself appear stupid. Why are you all so afraid of these witnesses of yours? And now you can't call Brian Albert because I will personally bring it to the defense's attention, and I have their cell phone numbers, uh, of how he's contradicting himself. If he comes out and says anything other than that he let Chloe outran at that time, which would make it moot whether or not she attacked John O'Keefe's no frozen arm at 12:30 at night, um, or snow-covered arm supposedly. Uh, anyway, and I started out actually for the prosecution, but the evidence that was presented in just a reasonable doubt of every— anybody watching any one of your witnesses And I pray that Proctor comes forward. He was actually the only believable one after he started telling the truth, and now he's being used as a patsy for all the others, which they set him up to be. And I pray that he comes forward against the Commonwealth.
5:01

What an interesting voicemail left for Hank Brennan during the Karen Read trial from a former DOJ paralaegal! Transcript: Hi, Mr. Brennan, if this is your voicemail, you're not listed in the select by name directory, understandably, but especially now. You know, I'm a former paralegal at DOJ, but now living in Tennessee, retired because of a disability. And I just have to say, I'm so disappointed in you. I left a message that was actually pleasant for Mr. Lally at the end of the other trial, because I felt like he was kind of being forced to turn a blind eye, and may even be trying to intentionally lose, because he deep down has his own suspicions. Um, you must, or you are really not watching the entirety of the previous trial, but I want you to know that what you're saying today is in direct contradiction to your own former witness Brian Albert's testimony, where he said he let Chloe out right at that time because he knew that some experts may deduce that they are dog bites. And that was leaving open the possibility that she attacked John's body outside where it wasn't even there yet. But, but at that time, you know, when they later said that Karen hit him, um, You must know that there's ample reasonable doubt or you wouldn't be going after expert witnesses. And just as a Christian, I am a, you know, fairly astute former paralegal, but also as a Christian, you know, uh, you know, you're going to have to answer to a higher power. And right now I would like to go with you to see Chloe since you did, she takes the beer out and say, sick of myself. For her to bite either D.A. Morrissey or you, but somehow I still don't feel like that way toward Mr. Lally. Um, and then you'll have a comparison of exactly what her claw and bite marks look like. And what does it matter, which the doctor is not contradicting herself about, and it's misogynistic of you to suggest that she is. And like one person in the chat I've been watching, it said she would like to see you go after the ARCA experts, but apparently you really are, but you probably speak with more respect to them. But now you're going to have to say that they're from the FBI or hired by the FBI. So, either you know something that the FBI is being told to stand down because of the change in administration, or you're just not concerned about your own reputation if even I, the paralegal in Tennessee now, can, can see the ineptitude of what you're saying. You know, I'm just disappointed even for you to let yourself appear stupid. Why are you all so afraid of these witnesses of yours? And now you can't call Brian Albert because I will personally bring it to the defense's attention, and I have their cell phone numbers, uh, of how he's contradicting himself. If he comes out and says anything other than that he let Chloe outran at that time, which would make it moot whether or not she attacked John O'Keefe's no frozen arm at 12:30 at night, um, or snow-covered arm supposedly. Uh, anyway, and I started out actually for the prosecution, but the evidence that was presented in just a reasonable doubt of every— anybody watching any one of your witnesses And I pray that Proctor comes forward. He was actually the only believable one after he started telling the truth, and now he's being used as a patsy for all the others, which they set him up to be. And I pray that he comes forward against the Commonwealth.

Grant Smith Ellis

31,315 views • 13 days ago

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."
2:40

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Sense Receptor

36,952 views • 5 months ago

Paul Pierce on Chicago Bulls Front Office saying next GM they hire has to keep Billy Donovan: “In most cases when a new general manager comes in, he wants to bring in his coach of choice. When you clean house at the top in the front office, it don’t make sense to bring in somebody who hasn’t had the success with the Bulls to keep them in place, you know, and then like if things don’t work out, who do you blame? Do you blame the GM? Do you blame the coach? He’s going to come back to Reinsdorf and say, “Well, you didn’t let me bring my coach in that I wanted.” I understand that Billy Donovan is a solid NBA coach, but like the general manager that comes in, if he has a plan and he has a system that he wants to kind of like implement. You have to allow him to do that. It’s just like if I go and I’m the manager at McDonald’s and you fired all these chefs and everything and you keep the one dude who make the fries and the fries ain’t been good. What? Like dog get him off the fries? Come on. They need to get everybody out of here. Get everybody out of there. Get them all out of here.” (Via No Fouls Given)
4:34

Paul Pierce on Chicago Bulls Front Office saying next GM they hire has to keep Billy Donovan: “In most cases when a new general manager comes in, he wants to bring in his coach of choice. When you clean house at the top in the front office, it don’t make sense to bring in somebody who hasn’t had the success with the Bulls to keep them in place, you know, and then like if things don’t work out, who do you blame? Do you blame the GM? Do you blame the coach? He’s going to come back to Reinsdorf and say, “Well, you didn’t let me bring my coach in that I wanted.” I understand that Billy Donovan is a solid NBA coach, but like the general manager that comes in, if he has a plan and he has a system that he wants to kind of like implement. You have to allow him to do that. It’s just like if I go and I’m the manager at McDonald’s and you fired all these chefs and everything and you keep the one dude who make the fries and the fries ain’t been good. What? Like dog get him off the fries? Come on. They need to get everybody out of here. Get everybody out of there. Get them all out of here.” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

61,365 views • 3 months ago

Arteta on making so many changes: “There are two actions defensively that we suffered a little bit. I don't think it's because of his position, but we altered things. We had to. But as well with the game that I expected, bringing Mosquera was going to lock something that we really believed that it can give us the fluidity and the chance to hurt them. “But sometimes you have to make another change and the one on Zubimendi was tough, but I really felt it that we had to put two attacking midfielders in that moment to generate all the kind of issues and threats, and thank God it worked out.”
0:34

Arteta on making so many changes: “There are two actions defensively that we suffered a little bit. I don't think it's because of his position, but we altered things. We had to. But as well with the game that I expected, bringing Mosquera was going to lock something that we really believed that it can give us the fluidity and the chance to hurt them. “But sometimes you have to make another change and the one on Zubimendi was tough, but I really felt it that we had to put two attacking midfielders in that moment to generate all the kind of issues and threats, and thank God it worked out.”

Connor Humm

163,573 views • 2 months ago

Cringe! Paula White paralleled Trump to Jesus, saying: “Mr. President, no one has paid the price like you have paid the price. It almost cost you your life. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us but it didn’t end there for Him, and it didn’t end there for you. And I believe that the Lord said to tell you this: because of His victory, you will be victorious in all you put your hands to.” If that doesn’t make you cringe, the comparison, the parallel to the Messiah, then I’m not sure what will. Especially that prosperity declaration at the end, that you will be successful in all that you put your hand to. We don’t have any guarantee of that. We have no promise of that in Scripture. We’ve been given no promise of that by God Himself. I hope that Trump is successful in the things that are righteous and good, but the comparison to the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords to Jesus Christ is just unnecessary and simply not true. Let’s just not do that. And let’s not “name it and claim it” either because that’s not something we have the right, the authority, or the guidance to do.
1:18

Cringe! Paula White paralleled Trump to Jesus, saying: “Mr. President, no one has paid the price like you have paid the price. It almost cost you your life. You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us but it didn’t end there for Him, and it didn’t end there for you. And I believe that the Lord said to tell you this: because of His victory, you will be victorious in all you put your hands to.” If that doesn’t make you cringe, the comparison, the parallel to the Messiah, then I’m not sure what will. Especially that prosperity declaration at the end, that you will be successful in all that you put your hand to. We don’t have any guarantee of that. We have no promise of that in Scripture. We’ve been given no promise of that by God Himself. I hope that Trump is successful in the things that are righteous and good, but the comparison to the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords to Jesus Christ is just unnecessary and simply not true. Let’s just not do that. And let’s not “name it and claim it” either because that’s not something we have the right, the authority, or the guidance to do.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

23,264 views • 3 months ago

Bill Maher leaves his guest visibly dumbfounded after yanking him out of his liberal bubble. Patton Oswalt couldn’t believe what he was hearing: “I’m sorry, I don’t remember [the left doing] that.” That’s when Bill Maher told him why his blind spot was so massive: “Because it doesn’t get into the Blue Sky Bubble.” OSWALT: “I hate to admit this: this country is not as mature as it thinks it is. We elected Obama, and clearly the country freaked out. And we’re still living in that freakout. We are not as progressed and evolved and intelligent as we think we are because we keep freaking out about this stuff.” MAHER: “The left freak out, too. The left freaked out about a lot of bullshit too.” OSWALT: “What did they freak out about?” MAHER: “Gender, race, parenthood, schools, homelessness, crime, the border, education. We stopped being a scientific people.” OSWALT: “But the left certainly stayed scientific.” MAHER: “No, they didn’t.” OSWALT: “Why not?” MAHER: “Because they think gender bullshit that they went way too far with… What makes us a great country is that we respect minorities. We don’t think they’re lesser just because they’re lesser in numbers. That’s not what we started to teach, which was that every baby is — I don’t know — let’s not even put it on the birth certificate. That’s what they wanted.” OSWALT: “Were we teaching that? Yes. When were we teaching that? Teaching it. It was a law here in California, see.” MAHER: “Yes.” OSWALT: “When were we teaching that?” MAHER: “Teaching it — it was a law here in California.” OSWALT: “To teach what?” MAHER: “Don’t put sex on the birth certificate. ‘We’ll see.’ Now, we’ve passed that period now.” OSWALT: “I’m sorry, I don’t remember that.” MAHER: “Because it doesn’t get in the Blue Sky bubble.”
2:06

Bill Maher leaves his guest visibly dumbfounded after yanking him out of his liberal bubble. Patton Oswalt couldn’t believe what he was hearing: “I’m sorry, I don’t remember [the left doing] that.” That’s when Bill Maher told him why his blind spot was so massive: “Because it doesn’t get into the Blue Sky Bubble.” OSWALT: “I hate to admit this: this country is not as mature as it thinks it is. We elected Obama, and clearly the country freaked out. And we’re still living in that freakout. We are not as progressed and evolved and intelligent as we think we are because we keep freaking out about this stuff.” MAHER: “The left freak out, too. The left freaked out about a lot of bullshit too.” OSWALT: “What did they freak out about?” MAHER: “Gender, race, parenthood, schools, homelessness, crime, the border, education. We stopped being a scientific people.” OSWALT: “But the left certainly stayed scientific.” MAHER: “No, they didn’t.” OSWALT: “Why not?” MAHER: “Because they think gender bullshit that they went way too far with… What makes us a great country is that we respect minorities. We don’t think they’re lesser just because they’re lesser in numbers. That’s not what we started to teach, which was that every baby is — I don’t know — let’s not even put it on the birth certificate. That’s what they wanted.” OSWALT: “Were we teaching that? Yes. When were we teaching that? Teaching it. It was a law here in California, see.” MAHER: “Yes.” OSWALT: “When were we teaching that?” MAHER: “Teaching it — it was a law here in California.” OSWALT: “To teach what?” MAHER: “Don’t put sex on the birth certificate. ‘We’ll see.’ Now, we’ve passed that period now.” OSWALT: “I’m sorry, I don’t remember that.” MAHER: “Because it doesn’t get in the Blue Sky bubble.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,371,064 views • 8 months ago