Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“Until recent years golf has been a game of imagination, creativity, and variety. The game has become much more one dimensional.” Fred Ridley spoke about Augusta Nationals full support of the golf ball rollback during his press conference introduction.

258,617 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

16 Kommentare

Profilbild von Maj. Tool
Maj. Toolvor 5 Monaten

This is stupid. I watch golf hoping I see one of the most elite players in the world hit a drive 350 yards or more! Not many of them can. The ones that can, work hard to get to that level. Why dont we just go back to wood drivers and wood balls by this logic.. Stupid!

Profilbild von MeikaRocco
MeikaRoccovor 5 Monaten

So change the performance of the golf ball used by millions of golfers because 2,000-3,000 top level golfers in ~24 world tours have made the game one dimensional. Absolutely STUPID reasoning.

Profilbild von Michael Hirtzel
Michael Hirtzelvor 5 Monaten

Gotta say anyone who thinks the game is still not a game of imagination, creativity, and variety, is flat out wrong. Love Fred though.

Profilbild von JB Opinions
JB Opinionsvor 5 Monaten

Anyone that is against the roll back should have to explain what exactly they love about the current restrictions at 120 mph, 10⁰ launch, 2520 rpm equating no more than 317 yards. This is about not having to play majors at 8000 yards.

Profilbild von Looper
Loopervor 5 Monaten

Rollback isn't going to do anything but benefit the super long hitters who can swing 125+ mph.

Profilbild von Zach Heisler
Zach Heislervor 5 Monaten

Maybe Fred and his club should change their design and evolve. Players have, it’s why they’ve become stronger, faster, smarter, and more equipped to win today than ever before. Maybe Augusta needs to do the same.

Profilbild von (long story, ask my siblings)
(long story, ask my siblings)vor 5 Monaten

Rolling back the ball is not enough. The equipment needs a roll back too. The game is becoming increasingly dull. Bring back steel shafts, reduce the size of the heads on drivers and limit the clubs per bag to 10.

Profilbild von Lee🇺🇦🇵🇸
Lee🇺🇦🇵🇸vor 5 Monaten

What a absolute 🔔🔚. His opinion means shit. Jumped up no mark who thinks he's important. #nonsense

Profilbild von Paul Meloan
Paul Meloanvor 5 Monaten

The real downside of the Masters is that every year we need to listen to this nonsense. Unfortunately bringing facts and logic only makes them double down. Sounds familiar.

Profilbild von ChrisofMtns
ChrisofMtnsvor 5 Monaten

Ridley needs to retire. Term limits? 😂

Profilbild von Josh Anderson
Josh Andersonvor 5 Monaten

Good. Roll it back. We will just get stronger. Won’t take long either.

Profilbild von Ty
Tyvor 5 Monaten

Stfu Fred

Profilbild von #XRP_SCOTLAND
#XRP_SCOTLANDvor 5 Monaten

What's next ? If you hit the ball to 5 foot they move it and make you hit a 10 foot putt

Profilbild von Jake Daniels
Jake Danielsvor 5 Monaten

Sure. But Titleist and Calloway etc have millions of golf balls in their warehouses ready to be sold. If the R & A and USGA change the configuration of the golf ball then they’ll be sued for billions….that’s what nobody is talking about

Profilbild von ☠️ RD Greenfield ☠️
☠️ RD Greenfield ☠️vor 5 Monaten

The ball rollback is like an obsession for fuds. It’s so tiresome. The average golfer only cares about: Using the same equipment as the pros. This is bc even the worst golfer occasionally makes a great/amazing shot, which allows them to imagine that if they could do it once, they could (in theory) do it every time. And if they could do it every time, they could (in theory) find their way onto the tour. That fantasy drives a lot of golfers. B) Hitting the ball as far as possible bc it’s one of the greatest feelings that exists. Ergo, rolling back the ball, or forcing weekend golfers to use “non conforming equipment” will remove some of the magic that drives the whole industry/sport. Not to mention, if you already aren’t using PGA conforming equipment (bc of the ball), then why not use equipment that wasn’t just “rolled back to meet PGA standards” but rather, was designed to be as great as possible without any concern for rules. If the solution is that everyone uses the rolled back ball, the the guy who drives it 120 yards is now driving it 100-110 and the course congestion/slowness that is rampant, just gets worse. All I can conclude from this “debate” is that it’s rich private club members pushing for the rollback in an effort to keep their course “relevant” to host professional or amateur events. It totally disregards the average golfer and the experience for 99% of golfers.

Profilbild von JH
JHvor 5 Monaten

Average driving distances on the PGA are up 40 yards since 1986 from 260 to 300 yards. Irons also hit longer so a Par 4 plays 50-60 yards less than it did 40 years ago. A 400 yard par four was driver, 8 iron in 1986 is now 3 wood, pitching wedge.

Ähnliche Videos

Chairman of Augusta National Golf Club and the Masters Tournament, Fred Ridley, delivered an impressive press conference yesterday. The most striking part was his firm assessment on the golf ball rollback debate. In his opening remarks, he said: “Finally, I've commented for the past several years on the subject of distance. We have been consistent in our support of the governing bodies in their effort to regulate the distance elite players are hitting the golf ball. Recognizing that the implementation of the Overall Distance Standard test for golf balls may be delayed to 2030, I want to reemphasize that support and affirm our position as the USGA and R&A represent their collective obligation as custodians of the game. “I also want to be clear that our position is grounded on much more than protecting the Augusta National golf course. We will continue to make modifications as are necessary to react to driving distances that in some cases exceed 350 yards. “Unfortunately, many courses, including some iconic venues, do not have that option. Until recent years golf has been a game of imagination, creativity, and variety. The game has become much more one-dimensional. As players drive the ball prodigious distances and routinely hit short irons into par-4s and even some par-5s, this issue goes beyond competitive impacts. Increased course lengths results in more time, more cost, and more environmental concerns. “The data that has been shared with all stakeholders makes one thing clear: The impact to the recreational game will be immaterial. All of us in this room and millions of weekend golfers around the world will be hard-pressed to notice the effects of this change, and I do not believe our enjoyment of the game will be affected. “As for professional golf, we hold firm in our belief that the greats of the game are defined not merely by how far they hit the ball, but their extraordinary skill in all aspects of the game. Their ability to shape shots, to take on risk, and to execute under pressure is at the heart of championship golf and is best displayed through a full spectrum of shot-making opportunities. “Regulation of the golf ball is not an attempt to turn back time or stifle progress. It is an effort to preserve the essence of what makes golf the great game that it is.” Later in the press conference when asked about the role of the Masters in the roll back, he said: “There has been -- there's always been quite a lot of agreement. My feeling on this subject is failure's not an option. I think we need to continue to work together to come to some agreement. “Tough issues like this require compromise, and I think there has been some compromise to date. There's certainly commercial interests that are at play here, and we all know what those are, but at the same time, I think, if we can look at this from the standpoint -- and it's not just trying to -- it's not the good old days. That's not what we're trying to do. “What we're trying to do is to protect the integrity of what makes golf so great. I think I tried to articulate it in my comments, and that's that it's more than about just hitting prodigious drives. “I talked to Jackson Herrington, one of our young amateurs, and he told me that yesterday he hit it over the bunker on 1 and 5, which is about a 325-yard carry, and one was into the wind. I've said that we can make changes, but there's not much we can do to make changes, number one, unless we tear down the Eisenhower Cabin, and we're not going to do that. “We'll make changes when we can, but I think it's time to really address this issue. It's been talked about for a long time.” Whatever your stance on the rollback, these are the strongest comments yet. “Failure is not an option.” The Masters

Flushing It

357,080 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten