Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Up to 20% increased payload capacity and reduced carbon dioxide emissions for the end customers. That’s what Sanggar Sarana Baja, manufacturer of #dumptruck bodies, received by adopting hardoxofficial 500 Tuf #steel as its primary material. ⚙🚚 Read more➡

SSAB_AB's profile picture

SSAB

8,126 subscribers

5,602,349 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииАвто и транспорт#dumptruck#steel
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Peter Walker
Peter Walker2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Their claims don't add up. A 20% increase in payload on a 200t truck is a 40t saving on the body weight of 27t The fuel savings don't exist if loaded to the same gross weight

Фото профиля Count Gustav
Count Gustav2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Are you still making this fighter aircraft?

Фото профиля SSAB
SSAB2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Hi Gustav! Best you'll check with @Saab_Inc 😊

Фото профиля 🧵 चरखा । CHARKHA 🧵
🧵 चरखा । CHARKHA 🧵2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial

Фото профиля Bazeera Fathima
Bazeera Fathima2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Reduce carbon prints phase out fossil fuels. These increased payload capacity and reduced carbon freeprints. These reduce bulk and volume of materials than other materials

Фото профиля Ayesha Majid Khan
Ayesha Majid Khan2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Walaikumassalam

Фото профиля Sunil Desai
Sunil Desai2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Is it lined or the body is made of Hardox?

Фото профиля SSAB
SSAB2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Hi Sunil! The body is made of full Hardox® material.

Фото профиля Zakir Hanief
Zakir Hanief2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial Problem solve ho jaye gi

Фото профиля GigaChad
GigaChad2 лет назад

@ptssb_indonesia @hardoxofficial What a joke..

Похожие видео

Unelected UN chief António Guterres: "Global emissions must be halved this decade." "And that means far more ambitious action to cut carbon pollution by speeding up the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy—especially in G20 countries—and decarbonising the highest-emitting industrial sectors like steel, cement, shipping and aviation." "If you cannot set a credible course for Net Zero... you should not be in business." Or how about you sit down and be quiet, since carbon dioxide is not "pollution", nobody ever elected you, and you don't get to appoint yourself the spokesman of the entire human race? Deal?
1:22

Unelected UN chief António Guterres: "Global emissions must be halved this decade." "And that means far more ambitious action to cut carbon pollution by speeding up the shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy—especially in G20 countries—and decarbonising the highest-emitting industrial sectors like steel, cement, shipping and aviation." "If you cannot set a credible course for Net Zero... you should not be in business." Or how about you sit down and be quiet, since carbon dioxide is not "pollution", nobody ever elected you, and you don't get to appoint yourself the spokesman of the entire human race? Deal?

Wide Awake Media

52,037 просмотров • 1 год назад

Most of the market is priced for a world that's coming to an end. Traditional software, legacy platforms, much of the SaaS layer of the S&P 500… all built on the assumption that humans will remain the primary customers. AI agents don't buy software the way we do. They don't need dashboards, subscriptions, or logins. And once the buyer changes, so does everything built around them. The investable opportunity ahead is the agentic economy… what gets built for agents as customers. That's where the next wave of capital ends up, and most people aren't positioned for it.
1:17

Most of the market is priced for a world that's coming to an end. Traditional software, legacy platforms, much of the SaaS layer of the S&P 500… all built on the assumption that humans will remain the primary customers. AI agents don't buy software the way we do. They don't need dashboards, subscriptions, or logins. And once the buyer changes, so does everything built around them. The investable opportunity ahead is the agentic economy… what gets built for agents as customers. That's where the next wave of capital ends up, and most people aren't positioned for it.

Raoul Pal

214,820 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the **cryogenic stainless flip**. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I've made a free playbook on how to use and create your own mental models. This includes the same thinking strategies Feynman, Munger, and Musk built their careers on. Ttrusted by 5,000+ founders and investors. Grab your copy: — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast
2:07

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the **cryogenic stainless flip**. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I've made a free playbook on how to use and create your own mental models. This includes the same thinking strategies Feynman, Munger, and Musk built their careers on. Ttrusted by 5,000+ founders and investors. Grab your copy: — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

829,800 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 Chinese modular building revolution goes global 🔸 Modular homes and pre-fabricated ‘Holon’ buildings can be built in days rather than months 🔸 Exports rose from $1.5 billion in 2015 to $4.3 billion in 2025, reaching the US, Australia, Russia and Southeast Asia 🔸 Use of lightweight steel B-core slabs for walls improve earthquake and typhoon resistance, and is claimed to cut carbon emissions by up to 90% 🔸 Rising labor and material costs, housing shortages and long build times have increased demand from developed countries 🔸 Demand in the developing world is due to supply chain problems, lack of skilled workers and an inefficient building trade The new Chinese prefab industry is setting a new global standard for speed, efficiency and environmental performance.
0:20

🚨🇨🇳 Chinese modular building revolution goes global 🔸 Modular homes and pre-fabricated ‘Holon’ buildings can be built in days rather than months 🔸 Exports rose from $1.5 billion in 2015 to $4.3 billion in 2025, reaching the US, Australia, Russia and Southeast Asia 🔸 Use of lightweight steel B-core slabs for walls improve earthquake and typhoon resistance, and is claimed to cut carbon emissions by up to 90% 🔸 Rising labor and material costs, housing shortages and long build times have increased demand from developed countries 🔸 Demand in the developing world is due to supply chain problems, lack of skilled workers and an inefficient building trade The new Chinese prefab industry is setting a new global standard for speed, efficiency and environmental performance.

Sputnik

14,844 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

New Hamas spokesman Abu Obaida: The duty of the time upon the Ummah is to stand as one row against its primary enemy, who seeks to turn the region into a gateway for what he calls “Greater Israel.” The clearest proof is his continued aggression against Lebanon and Syria. Greetings to our people in Syria who faced the Zionist aggression with their bodies after being left alone. Wake up, O Nation of Islam, and see the weakness of this enemy humiliated in Gaza. Know that the autumn of the occupation has begun. Another battle will shake its pillars and hasten its demise, by Allah’s permission.
1:14

New Hamas spokesman Abu Obaida: The duty of the time upon the Ummah is to stand as one row against its primary enemy, who seeks to turn the region into a gateway for what he calls “Greater Israel.” The clearest proof is his continued aggression against Lebanon and Syria. Greetings to our people in Syria who faced the Zionist aggression with their bodies after being left alone. Wake up, O Nation of Islam, and see the weakness of this enemy humiliated in Gaza. Know that the autumn of the occupation has begun. Another battle will shake its pillars and hasten its demise, by Allah’s permission.

Clash Report

95,138 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I heartily congratulate my bestie Aliko Dangote as the 8th Wonder of the World – the $20 Billion (Twenty Billion Dollars) Dangote Group Refinery – officially commences production. The Dangote Petrochemical Complex, which consists of the world’s largest single-train 650,000 barrels per day Petroleum Refinery, a 1 million metric tonnes of Polypropylene per-annum facility, and two of the world’s largest Fertilizer Trains – with a capacity of producing 3 Million Tonnes of Urea – is much more than just an industrial milestone; it’s a testament to the visionary leadership and relentless pursuit of excellence of one of Africa’s finest and most dogged patriots. I had a front-row seat as this vision was conceptualized and took shape. And I am familiar with the sleepless nights you’ve had to work through over the last decade to bring this dream to fruition. This refinery is a beacon of hope for millions of Nigerians and Africans. It is also at the vanguard of championing environmental sustainability. With its Carbon capture technologies and storage processes it will capture up to 90%+ of the CO2 emitted and also play a significant role in reducing Well-to-tank carbon emissions from crude oil maritime transportation, thereby playing its own role in helping Nigeria meet its target for net-zero emissions by 2060. The Refinery recircles 100% of its water. The heat coming out of the process is fully captured to produce 50MW of Power. Dangote is also producing Euro 5 to replace the bad Euro 5 that has been dumped in Africa for a long time. Shipping 65,000 barrels per day of crude out of Nigeria and 650kbpd in refined products to Nigeria and nearby countries which is 480 ships of 1m barrels per day will save 1.5m to 2.5m tons of CO2 emissions. This will help the environment. By meeting our requirements for all refined petroleum products, it will champion energy security and independence for our nation and act as a catalyst for a new era of prosperity for the subcontinent. It promises economic transformation for Nigerians today and for generations to come. Congratulations, Aliko Dangote . Africa is proud of you! …F.Ote💲
0:39

I heartily congratulate my bestie Aliko Dangote as the 8th Wonder of the World – the $20 Billion (Twenty Billion Dollars) Dangote Group Refinery – officially commences production. The Dangote Petrochemical Complex, which consists of the world’s largest single-train 650,000 barrels per day Petroleum Refinery, a 1 million metric tonnes of Polypropylene per-annum facility, and two of the world’s largest Fertilizer Trains – with a capacity of producing 3 Million Tonnes of Urea – is much more than just an industrial milestone; it’s a testament to the visionary leadership and relentless pursuit of excellence of one of Africa’s finest and most dogged patriots. I had a front-row seat as this vision was conceptualized and took shape. And I am familiar with the sleepless nights you’ve had to work through over the last decade to bring this dream to fruition. This refinery is a beacon of hope for millions of Nigerians and Africans. It is also at the vanguard of championing environmental sustainability. With its Carbon capture technologies and storage processes it will capture up to 90%+ of the CO2 emitted and also play a significant role in reducing Well-to-tank carbon emissions from crude oil maritime transportation, thereby playing its own role in helping Nigeria meet its target for net-zero emissions by 2060. The Refinery recircles 100% of its water. The heat coming out of the process is fully captured to produce 50MW of Power. Dangote is also producing Euro 5 to replace the bad Euro 5 that has been dumped in Africa for a long time. Shipping 65,000 barrels per day of crude out of Nigeria and 650kbpd in refined products to Nigeria and nearby countries which is 480 ships of 1m barrels per day will save 1.5m to 2.5m tons of CO2 emissions. This will help the environment. By meeting our requirements for all refined petroleum products, it will champion energy security and independence for our nation and act as a catalyst for a new era of prosperity for the subcontinent. It promises economic transformation for Nigerians today and for generations to come. Congratulations, Aliko Dangote . Africa is proud of you! …F.Ote💲

Femi Ote$

982,886 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Massive Study Reveals More Bad News for the COVID Vaccinated The "conspiracy theorists" were right once again. There are HUGE health risks from the jab, no matter how much the media tries to downplay it. Take a look for yourself: Moderna (Dose 1/2): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk (first dose) • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, had to say: “And they’re not even talking about cancer … but how about this? You’re like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? “They’re not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they’re only just starting the list. “And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine.”
6:12

Massive Study Reveals More Bad News for the COVID Vaccinated The "conspiracy theorists" were right once again. There are HUGE health risks from the jab, no matter how much the media tries to downplay it. Take a look for yourself: Moderna (Dose 1/2): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk (first dose) • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, had to say: “And they’re not even talking about cancer … but how about this? You’re like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? “They’re not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they’re only just starting the list. “And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

809,925 просмотров • 2 лет назад

THIS ISN’T HOW YOU BUILD A STRONG COUNTRY. 🇨🇦 Instead of securing better trade deals, lowering costs and creating the conditions for businesses to invest and expand… Mark Carney’s answer is apparently: MORE SUBSIDIES. MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT. INDEFINITELY That’s not economic strength. That’s dependence. A sovereign country should build an economy that can compete on its own merits not one permanently propped up by Ottawa. The ELBOWS UP crowd wanted independence from America. What they will end up getting is dependence on government. Less free enterprise. More state support. More managed economics. And somehow they’re calling that sovereignty.
2:14

THIS ISN’T HOW YOU BUILD A STRONG COUNTRY. 🇨🇦 Instead of securing better trade deals, lowering costs and creating the conditions for businesses to invest and expand… Mark Carney’s answer is apparently: MORE SUBSIDIES. MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT. INDEFINITELY That’s not economic strength. That’s dependence. A sovereign country should build an economy that can compete on its own merits not one permanently propped up by Ottawa. The ELBOWS UP crowd wanted independence from America. What they will end up getting is dependence on government. Less free enterprise. More state support. More managed economics. And somehow they’re calling that sovereignty.

Marc Nixon

23,667 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Largest Vaccine Study Ever Reveals What the "Conspiracy Theorists" Said All Along Scientists found MASSIVE increased risks of developing several serious health conditions post-jab. But headlines suggest they're "small" and "rare." Take a look for yourself. Moderna (1st Dose): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree had to say: "You're like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? "They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they're only just starting the list. "And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine."
3:13

Largest Vaccine Study Ever Reveals What the "Conspiracy Theorists" Said All Along Scientists found MASSIVE increased risks of developing several serious health conditions post-jab. But headlines suggest they're "small" and "rare." Take a look for yourself. Moderna (1st Dose): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree had to say: "You're like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? "They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they're only just starting the list. "And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

523,886 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“In the last 200 years, our water has been totally corrupted.” Dr. Pierre Kory says a mineral extract added to water could dramatically reduce pesticide uptake in plants. “What these minerals do is they transform the water and the quality and properties of the water.” “This mineral extract can actually, in my mind, restore water not only to its kind of original state, but its original properties.” “When you use this kind of restored water, the pesticide uptake is reduced by up to 85%, and on average 50%.” “The plants grow faster, they’re much more sturdy, they’re much more resistant to pests.” “I think I’m on the vanguard of what could be something that’s transformative for all of us.” Pierre Kory, MD MPA
3:13

“In the last 200 years, our water has been totally corrupted.” Dr. Pierre Kory says a mineral extract added to water could dramatically reduce pesticide uptake in plants. “What these minerals do is they transform the water and the quality and properties of the water.” “This mineral extract can actually, in my mind, restore water not only to its kind of original state, but its original properties.” “When you use this kind of restored water, the pesticide uptake is reduced by up to 85%, and on average 50%.” “The plants grow faster, they’re much more sturdy, they’re much more resistant to pests.” “I think I’m on the vanguard of what could be something that’s transformative for all of us.” Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Children’s Health Defense

56,261 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

⚠️ Our leaders are now openly celebrating Britain’s collapse — and calling it “progress.” A 15% drop in carbon emissions sounds good on paper, until you read the fine print. It didn’t happen because of clean innovation… it happened because over 100 factories shut down, 300,000 jobs disappeared, and what was once our heavy industry has been shipped off to China and India. They’re clapping about “net zero” while the UK quietly bleeds out its manufacturing base. Steel, glass, cement — the backbone of any strong economy — gone. And this isn’t by accident. These policies are designed to strangle productivity under the illusion of saving the planet. It’s the middle class paying the price. Jobs gone. Taxes up. Energy costs rising. And the same people who caused it are hugging each other on stage for hitting their “targets.” This is what I’ve warned about for years — the slow dismantling of Western economies under the banner of sustainability.
17:53

⚠️ Our leaders are now openly celebrating Britain’s collapse — and calling it “progress.” A 15% drop in carbon emissions sounds good on paper, until you read the fine print. It didn’t happen because of clean innovation… it happened because over 100 factories shut down, 300,000 jobs disappeared, and what was once our heavy industry has been shipped off to China and India. They’re clapping about “net zero” while the UK quietly bleeds out its manufacturing base. Steel, glass, cement — the backbone of any strong economy — gone. And this isn’t by accident. These policies are designed to strangle productivity under the illusion of saving the planet. It’s the middle class paying the price. Jobs gone. Taxes up. Energy costs rising. And the same people who caused it are hugging each other on stage for hitting their “targets.” This is what I’ve warned about for years — the slow dismantling of Western economies under the banner of sustainability.

Neil McCoy-Ward

72,315 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Western China-watchers love calling China the climate villain while writing their complaints from devices that had their carbon footprint offshored to China. China is the factory of the world, it manufactures much of what the planet uses. Yet its per capita CO₂ emissions are still far lower than America’s (~9.1 t vs ~13.6 t per person). That’s an astonishing feat by itself. Even more impressive: China’s emissions have now been flat or falling for 21 straight months (since March 2024), with a slight decline in full-year 2025 — all while its economy and exports kept growing. How? By leading the planet in clean-energy deployment at a scale no one else comes close to: record solar + wind builds, massive nuclear expansion, and fusion breakthroughs. The same countries that powered their own industrial revolutions with dirty coal, and offshored their own pollution, now lecture China for cleaning up faster than they ever did. They wouldn’t have cared if China polluted even more than they do today, as long as it stayed in its place as a simple order-taker: quietly making whatever the West demanded and slapping Western brands on it. But the moment China started innovating on its own and building its own world-class brands in EVs, solar, batteries, high-speed rail, phones and more, that’s when the narrative flipped. Suddenly they couldn’t accept what China had become. It was never really about the climate. It was always about China out-competing and out-innovating them. And that’s something they absolutely cannot stand. Watch the full show with Carl Zha here:
3:29

Western China-watchers love calling China the climate villain while writing their complaints from devices that had their carbon footprint offshored to China. China is the factory of the world, it manufactures much of what the planet uses. Yet its per capita CO₂ emissions are still far lower than America’s (~9.1 t vs ~13.6 t per person). That’s an astonishing feat by itself. Even more impressive: China’s emissions have now been flat or falling for 21 straight months (since March 2024), with a slight decline in full-year 2025 — all while its economy and exports kept growing. How? By leading the planet in clean-energy deployment at a scale no one else comes close to: record solar + wind builds, massive nuclear expansion, and fusion breakthroughs. The same countries that powered their own industrial revolutions with dirty coal, and offshored their own pollution, now lecture China for cleaning up faster than they ever did. They wouldn’t have cared if China polluted even more than they do today, as long as it stayed in its place as a simple order-taker: quietly making whatever the West demanded and slapping Western brands on it. But the moment China started innovating on its own and building its own world-class brands in EVs, solar, batteries, high-speed rail, phones and more, that’s when the narrative flipped. Suddenly they couldn’t accept what China had become. It was never really about the climate. It was always about China out-competing and out-innovating them. And that’s something they absolutely cannot stand. Watch the full show with Carl Zha here:

Daniel Dumbrill

20,591 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

2026 Conservative Claire Coutinho claims the UK's pursuit of Net Zero is driven by ideology, and that using less wind and solar could save the equivalent of around £500 per household a year 2023: Conservative Claire Coutinho, "Nothing will distract us from achieving Net Zero or driving forward with renewables" The claim that less wind and solar would save every household £500 a year is deeply misleading. Coutinho is effectively taking the result of a model that changes almost the entire future electricity system—less wind and solar, much more nuclear and gas, different grid requirements and, crucially, no carbon price—and presenting the resulting £500-plus difference as though it were the cost of renewables. The research simply doesn't establish that. The figure does not come from evidence that renewables currently add £500 to household bills. It comes from a Conservative-backed modelling exercise comparing two hypothetical energy systems and turning £320 billion of estimated economy-wide savings between 2030 and 2050 into an annual equivalent per household. Crucially, the supposedly cheaper alternative doesn't simply build less wind and solar. It assumes far more nuclear power, substantially more unabated gas, lower spending on networks and balancing, and the removal of carbon pricing from electricity generation. Of the £320 billion headline saving, £137bn comes from assumed lower network costs, £67bn from balancing and ancillary services, £22bn from subsidies and capacity costs, and £94bn from lower wholesale prices. That £94 billion is particularly important because much of that supposed saving is created by changing the rules of the comparison. The existing-policy scenario assumes generators continue paying a carbon price which rises substantially towards 2050; the alternative effectively abolishes that carbon price from 2031. Unsurprisingly, a model in which gas-fired electricity no longer carries that cost produces cheaper wholesale electricity. But that isn't evidence that wind and solar made electricity £94bn more expensive. It is principally the consequence of assuming a major carbon-pricing policy is abolished. Nor is removing carbon pricing simply £94bn of free money. Carbon pricing is deliberately intended to make polluters account for their emissions, discourage fossil-fuel generation and encourage cleaner alternatives, while carbon allowances also generate government revenue. Removing it means accepting considerably greater emissions and losing those revenues and incentives. The alternative model consequently produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of additional CO₂. The model also assumes Britain can successfully build around 20GW of nuclear capacity, while retaining much greater dependence on gas. Whether nuclear can be delivered at the assumed cost and timetable is far from guaranteed, while greater reliance on gas leaves households more vulnerable to international gas-price shocks—the same exposure that played such a large role in Britain's recent energy-price crisis. There is a legitimate argument about the costs associated with large amounts of wind and solar. An electricity system dependent on intermittent generation requires substantial investment in transmission, balancing, storage, interconnectors and backup capacity, and those costs shouldn't be ignored. But that is very different from demonstrating that wind and solar cost every household £500 a year. Nearly £100bn of the supposed saving comes from the decision to remove carbon pricing, not from discovering that wind and solar are £100bn more expensive. Coutinho has taken a £500-plus headline generated by a Conservative-backed model containing a whole package of assumptions—less wind and solar, much more nuclear, more gas, less grid investment and the abolition of carbon pricing—and presented it to the public as evidence that Britain's reliance on wind and solar is costing households hundreds of pounds. That's misleading because the model doesn't establish that. It establishes that, if you change the entire future energy system and the taxes imposed upon it, its authors calculate a lower overall system cost. Turning that into “less wind and solar will save your household £500” strips away the assumptions that actually produce the number.
1:23

2026 Conservative Claire Coutinho claims the UK's pursuit of Net Zero is driven by ideology, and that using less wind and solar could save the equivalent of around £500 per household a year 2023: Conservative Claire Coutinho, "Nothing will distract us from achieving Net Zero or driving forward with renewables" The claim that less wind and solar would save every household £500 a year is deeply misleading. Coutinho is effectively taking the result of a model that changes almost the entire future electricity system—less wind and solar, much more nuclear and gas, different grid requirements and, crucially, no carbon price—and presenting the resulting £500-plus difference as though it were the cost of renewables. The research simply doesn't establish that. The figure does not come from evidence that renewables currently add £500 to household bills. It comes from a Conservative-backed modelling exercise comparing two hypothetical energy systems and turning £320 billion of estimated economy-wide savings between 2030 and 2050 into an annual equivalent per household. Crucially, the supposedly cheaper alternative doesn't simply build less wind and solar. It assumes far more nuclear power, substantially more unabated gas, lower spending on networks and balancing, and the removal of carbon pricing from electricity generation. Of the £320 billion headline saving, £137bn comes from assumed lower network costs, £67bn from balancing and ancillary services, £22bn from subsidies and capacity costs, and £94bn from lower wholesale prices. That £94 billion is particularly important because much of that supposed saving is created by changing the rules of the comparison. The existing-policy scenario assumes generators continue paying a carbon price which rises substantially towards 2050; the alternative effectively abolishes that carbon price from 2031. Unsurprisingly, a model in which gas-fired electricity no longer carries that cost produces cheaper wholesale electricity. But that isn't evidence that wind and solar made electricity £94bn more expensive. It is principally the consequence of assuming a major carbon-pricing policy is abolished. Nor is removing carbon pricing simply £94bn of free money. Carbon pricing is deliberately intended to make polluters account for their emissions, discourage fossil-fuel generation and encourage cleaner alternatives, while carbon allowances also generate government revenue. Removing it means accepting considerably greater emissions and losing those revenues and incentives. The alternative model consequently produces hundreds of millions of tonnes of additional CO₂. The model also assumes Britain can successfully build around 20GW of nuclear capacity, while retaining much greater dependence on gas. Whether nuclear can be delivered at the assumed cost and timetable is far from guaranteed, while greater reliance on gas leaves households more vulnerable to international gas-price shocks—the same exposure that played such a large role in Britain's recent energy-price crisis. There is a legitimate argument about the costs associated with large amounts of wind and solar. An electricity system dependent on intermittent generation requires substantial investment in transmission, balancing, storage, interconnectors and backup capacity, and those costs shouldn't be ignored. But that is very different from demonstrating that wind and solar cost every household £500 a year. Nearly £100bn of the supposed saving comes from the decision to remove carbon pricing, not from discovering that wind and solar are £100bn more expensive. Coutinho has taken a £500-plus headline generated by a Conservative-backed model containing a whole package of assumptions—less wind and solar, much more nuclear, more gas, less grid investment and the abolition of carbon pricing—and presented it to the public as evidence that Britain's reliance on wind and solar is costing households hundreds of pounds. That's misleading because the model doesn't establish that. It establishes that, if you change the entire future energy system and the taxes imposed upon it, its authors calculate a lower overall system cost. Turning that into “less wind and solar will save your household £500” strips away the assumptions that actually produce the number.

Farrukh

14,159 просмотров • 12 дней назад

This part of the Alberta - Mark Carney MOU that drives up the real cost of compliance, which Carney boasts will increase by 6x. "In its core, is tightening the TIER system which is the industrial carbon tax price system here in Alberta...it means more than 6 times increase in the price of industrial price of carbon from its effective level." Effective Price is the actual number that hits the operating expense the hardest and impacts the balance sheet. I guarantee you every company's accounting department are now doing calculations and any future investment decision in Alberta will have this in their decision-making. The MOU's whole point on the industrial carbon tax is the convergence of the Headline Price-Effective Price-Floor Price. This is what ensures that companies pay the highest costs, with a slight gap for functional gap to trade credits. With the reduction in the "free" emissions allowance by 2% annually, creates a double whammy that has significant and mandatory increase in the cost of doing business in Alberta. This is the foundational part of the financial engineering mechanism behind carbon trade based system the Mark Carney has been drooling to implement for years. Every dollar on this doesn't go towards company's core business; such as drilling, doesn't go towards paying down debt or returning capital to shareholders. It forces companies to spend $ and send $ to projects that may be completely uneconomical and less productive, such as Carbon Capture etc. UCP just agreed to the biggest cost increase and red tape for our industries in Alberta's history.
0:25

This part of the Alberta - Mark Carney MOU that drives up the real cost of compliance, which Carney boasts will increase by 6x. "In its core, is tightening the TIER system which is the industrial carbon tax price system here in Alberta...it means more than 6 times increase in the price of industrial price of carbon from its effective level." Effective Price is the actual number that hits the operating expense the hardest and impacts the balance sheet. I guarantee you every company's accounting department are now doing calculations and any future investment decision in Alberta will have this in their decision-making. The MOU's whole point on the industrial carbon tax is the convergence of the Headline Price-Effective Price-Floor Price. This is what ensures that companies pay the highest costs, with a slight gap for functional gap to trade credits. With the reduction in the "free" emissions allowance by 2% annually, creates a double whammy that has significant and mandatory increase in the cost of doing business in Alberta. This is the foundational part of the financial engineering mechanism behind carbon trade based system the Mark Carney has been drooling to implement for years. Every dollar on this doesn't go towards company's core business; such as drilling, doesn't go towards paying down debt or returning capital to shareholders. It forces companies to spend $ and send $ to projects that may be completely uneconomical and less productive, such as Carbon Capture etc. UCP just agreed to the biggest cost increase and red tape for our industries in Alberta's history.

Kirk Lubimov

19,211 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Government has approved an eastern coast railway project forming part of the Howrah–Chennai High Density Network. The corridor spans from Kolkata through Odisha covering Balasore, Bhadrak, Jakhapura, Haridaspur, Cuttack, Bhubaneswar, Khurda and Berhampur, and extends into Andhra Pradesh through Naupada, Vizianagaram and Visakhapatnam up to Vijayawada and Chennai. This stretch is being developed as a four lined corridor to ease congestion and improve connectivity. The project will benefit major ports such as Kakinada, Machilipatnam and Gangavaram, strengthening cargo movement and logistics. The project includes 3 mega bridges, 58 major bridges, 416 minor bridges, 73 underpasses and 3 flyovers, along with a 2.7 km elevated railway line, with a total track length of about 458 km. Designed for high density, high capacity and high speed operations, it will address heavy traffic across the corridor. The project is expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by about 51.5 crore kilograms annually, supporting a shift from road to rail and improving environmental sustainability. -Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw #CabinetDecisions
5:23

The Government has approved an eastern coast railway project forming part of the Howrah–Chennai High Density Network. The corridor spans from Kolkata through Odisha covering Balasore, Bhadrak, Jakhapura, Haridaspur, Cuttack, Bhubaneswar, Khurda and Berhampur, and extends into Andhra Pradesh through Naupada, Vizianagaram and Visakhapatnam up to Vijayawada and Chennai. This stretch is being developed as a four lined corridor to ease congestion and improve connectivity. The project will benefit major ports such as Kakinada, Machilipatnam and Gangavaram, strengthening cargo movement and logistics. The project includes 3 mega bridges, 58 major bridges, 416 minor bridges, 73 underpasses and 3 flyovers, along with a 2.7 km elevated railway line, with a total track length of about 458 km. Designed for high density, high capacity and high speed operations, it will address heavy traffic across the corridor. The project is expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by about 51.5 crore kilograms annually, supporting a shift from road to rail and improving environmental sustainability. -Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw #CabinetDecisions

PIB India

39,359 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NEWS: BYD has launched its next-generation battery energy storage system. It has a unit capacity of 14.5 MWh, the highest globally to date. The energy storage system achieves an ultra-large capacity of 10 MWh within a space equivalent to a 20-foot container, BYD said. For a 1 GWh storage plant, it will cut the number of required units by more than half, reduce land use by one-third, and trim cell count by 76%, according to the manufacturer. It uses BYD’s self-developed 2,710 Ah Blade Battery cell, which the company claims is the largest energy storage cell in the world. "This next-generation cell delivers three times the capacity of conventional storage batteries, boasts a cycle life of over 10,000 cycles, and reduces the total lifecycle cost per kilowatt-hour to below $0.014 – a milestone that could reshape the economics of large-scale storage." BYD says it can cut project-level levelized costs (LCOS) by 21.7%. For a typical 1 GWh installation, total costs related to equipment procurement, transportation, and installation are expected to drop by around 30%. In addition, BYD has launched its new GC Flux grid-forming inverter solution, which covers the 2.5–10 MW capacity range. According to BYD, the inverter boasts a performance level approximately 38% higher than common industry standards and a maximum power density of 1,474 kW/㎡, which is around 130% above typical values in today’s market. The system provides an overload capacity of up to 3x for 10 seconds and reaches a peak efficiency of 99.35%.
0:44

NEWS: BYD has launched its next-generation battery energy storage system. It has a unit capacity of 14.5 MWh, the highest globally to date. The energy storage system achieves an ultra-large capacity of 10 MWh within a space equivalent to a 20-foot container, BYD said. For a 1 GWh storage plant, it will cut the number of required units by more than half, reduce land use by one-third, and trim cell count by 76%, according to the manufacturer. It uses BYD’s self-developed 2,710 Ah Blade Battery cell, which the company claims is the largest energy storage cell in the world. "This next-generation cell delivers three times the capacity of conventional storage batteries, boasts a cycle life of over 10,000 cycles, and reduces the total lifecycle cost per kilowatt-hour to below $0.014 – a milestone that could reshape the economics of large-scale storage." BYD says it can cut project-level levelized costs (LCOS) by 21.7%. For a typical 1 GWh installation, total costs related to equipment procurement, transportation, and installation are expected to drop by around 30%. In addition, BYD has launched its new GC Flux grid-forming inverter solution, which covers the 2.5–10 MW capacity range. According to BYD, the inverter boasts a performance level approximately 38% higher than common industry standards and a maximum power density of 1,474 kW/㎡, which is around 130% above typical values in today’s market. The system provides an overload capacity of up to 3x for 10 seconds and reaches a peak efficiency of 99.35%.

Sawyer Merritt

384,738 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Europe imports 80% of the hydrocarbons it consumes and that oil and gas keeps getting more expensive as they unplug from Russian gas and become hostages of the Strait of Hormuz. Germany resisted deindustrialization during the “China Shock” of the early 2000’s in large part due to the ultra cheap Russian pipeline gas that it built its economy around since the 1970’s oil shocks. France electrified its way out of its oil dependence with 54 large reactors built in 20 years. Today’s Europe is short on domestically produced hydrocarbons, refuses to explore for more and has lost the state and industrial capacity to build nuclear effectively. It has somehow convinced itself that deindustrialization and offshoring emissions to Asia was climate heroism. That buying hydrocarbons from elsewhere rather than producing them at home would absolve them from their sins. Will 1970’s energy literate leadership return to Europe? What do you think?
1:48

Europe imports 80% of the hydrocarbons it consumes and that oil and gas keeps getting more expensive as they unplug from Russian gas and become hostages of the Strait of Hormuz. Germany resisted deindustrialization during the “China Shock” of the early 2000’s in large part due to the ultra cheap Russian pipeline gas that it built its economy around since the 1970’s oil shocks. France electrified its way out of its oil dependence with 54 large reactors built in 20 years. Today’s Europe is short on domestically produced hydrocarbons, refuses to explore for more and has lost the state and industrial capacity to build nuclear effectively. It has somehow convinced itself that deindustrialization and offshoring emissions to Asia was climate heroism. That buying hydrocarbons from elsewhere rather than producing them at home would absolve them from their sins. Will 1970’s energy literate leadership return to Europe? What do you think?

chris keefer

33,403 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

American Rancher Warning America About What’s Being Threatened By The USDA & ESG Carbon Regulations - Big Agricultural Will Force All Smaller Farms Out - CEO for Rabobank said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets - Cameras To Monitor Citizens On How Far You Drive - They Will Control What You Eat & What Your Kids Eat In Schools - ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500 million dollar plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change - Digital Tracking Tags On Cattle - They want your land - & Much more all in the name of Climate Change “Agriculture cannot go along with this carbon deal. You cannot agree to have your carbon emissions measured in any way because what they want, like I read out of that Tyson Foods ESG report, what they want is your supplier data and a standardized way of calculating it. Because what do you think the next step is? They're going to want you to reduce it and reduce it and reduce it. It's $3,000,000,000 that the USDA took with no oversight. What they wanna do with it is build a system that measures your carbon emissions. They're kinda giving away what the problem is there. The problem is you and your carbon emissions. And all the bigwigs in agriculture have pretty much signed on to this deal and that narrative, that carbon emissions are this huge problem. But they also want to control how far you can travel. And they've actually tried to regulate this in different places in Europe where they put up cameras that monitor their citizens that make sure they're not traveling too far around the city or even driving older cars and things like that. And the citizens have cut the cameras down. The CEO for Rabobank had said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets. And if you're too poor to fly and you want to travel, you should put on a virtual reality headset, and that's how you can see the world. They also want to control what you eat. And the New York City schools right now, they have taken meat off the menu for at least 2 days of the week. And the New York City mayor has said that he is working on a plan where he will limit residents' ability to consume meat. And then you have also, you know, ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500,000,000 plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change. And they want your land. Biden's, uh, 30 by 30 executive order, which a lot of you are familiar with, I think, um, conservation easements and then, of course, eminent domain in this state. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, has said using eminent domain, the government should take away farmland so that they can, uh, put up windmills. That's his suggestion. All in the name of climate change. Farm Journal's trust in beef program, which is where the $40 million went to. You can put, EID tag or a tracking device in your calf's ear, and they will store all your information, all that cattle all that animal's information. But then you put an app on your phone, and you put all of the information about your operation into that app, how you have to rotate your cattle, what you feed them, your land, soil. All that goes into the app. — So if you rotate or if you feed certain things, they're going to measure your carbon emissions before and after, and they're going to say that you're calculating your benefits. And so what do you think they're going to do with that information once they can control your entire operation and have all the measurements of carbon emissions from your entire operation, they're going to control every aspect of your life.”
3:18

American Rancher Warning America About What’s Being Threatened By The USDA & ESG Carbon Regulations - Big Agricultural Will Force All Smaller Farms Out - CEO for Rabobank said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets - Cameras To Monitor Citizens On How Far You Drive - They Will Control What You Eat & What Your Kids Eat In Schools - ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500 million dollar plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change - Digital Tracking Tags On Cattle - They want your land - & Much more all in the name of Climate Change “Agriculture cannot go along with this carbon deal. You cannot agree to have your carbon emissions measured in any way because what they want, like I read out of that Tyson Foods ESG report, what they want is your supplier data and a standardized way of calculating it. Because what do you think the next step is? They're going to want you to reduce it and reduce it and reduce it. It's $3,000,000,000 that the USDA took with no oversight. What they wanna do with it is build a system that measures your carbon emissions. They're kinda giving away what the problem is there. The problem is you and your carbon emissions. And all the bigwigs in agriculture have pretty much signed on to this deal and that narrative, that carbon emissions are this huge problem. But they also want to control how far you can travel. And they've actually tried to regulate this in different places in Europe where they put up cameras that monitor their citizens that make sure they're not traveling too far around the city or even driving older cars and things like that. And the citizens have cut the cameras down. The CEO for Rabobank had said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets. And if you're too poor to fly and you want to travel, you should put on a virtual reality headset, and that's how you can see the world. They also want to control what you eat. And the New York City schools right now, they have taken meat off the menu for at least 2 days of the week. And the New York City mayor has said that he is working on a plan where he will limit residents' ability to consume meat. And then you have also, you know, ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500,000,000 plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change. And they want your land. Biden's, uh, 30 by 30 executive order, which a lot of you are familiar with, I think, um, conservation easements and then, of course, eminent domain in this state. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, has said using eminent domain, the government should take away farmland so that they can, uh, put up windmills. That's his suggestion. All in the name of climate change. Farm Journal's trust in beef program, which is where the $40 million went to. You can put, EID tag or a tracking device in your calf's ear, and they will store all your information, all that cattle all that animal's information. But then you put an app on your phone, and you put all of the information about your operation into that app, how you have to rotate your cattle, what you feed them, your land, soil. All that goes into the app. — So if you rotate or if you feed certain things, they're going to measure your carbon emissions before and after, and they're going to say that you're calculating your benefits. And so what do you think they're going to do with that information once they can control your entire operation and have all the measurements of carbon emissions from your entire operation, they're going to control every aspect of your life.”

Wall Street Apes

507,710 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Excited to announce UtilitySat, the world’s first multi-mission geostationary satellite, that we're launching at the end of this year. This is a first of its kind. And a new product line-- providing on-demand connectivity for disaster relief, bridge capacity, and other missions. We started Astranis to build something new: small communications satellites that provide dedicated broadband capacity for our customers. At the end of this year we’re launching four more of them on a dedicated Falcon 9 rocket, with many more to come after that. That launch of four satellites includes one satellite for Peru, two satellites for in-flight connectivity, and a fourth satellite that had been previously kept under wraps. Until now. Introducing UtilitySat, the Swiss Army Knife of satellites This is a new product— the world’s first multi-mission commercial GEO satellite, capable of conducting multiple fully-operational broadband connectivity missions. And it is just the first of many. We’ll plan to launch many UtilitySats in the years to come. UtilitySat can provide connectivity on standard Ku, Ka, and Q/V bands, and has the flexibility to dial in exact frequencies using Astranis’s proprietary ultra-wideband software-defined radio. It can also relocate dozens of times around the GEO belt over its lifetime. It does this using our unique on-board dual-propulsion architecture, which includes both a chemical monopropellant system and an electric ion thruster. A new mission every year, or every month When we first began development of UtilitySat almost 2 years ago, we had many different missions in mind. UtilitySat can serve as bridge capacity for a customer that is waiting for a dedicated satellite, as an on-orbit spare, or as extra, surge capacity that can be brought in to supplement the broadband service we’re providing to one of our customers. There are acute needs as well — a natural disaster can wipe out terrestrial connectivity over a huge geographic area. One of the top priorities for first responders and during disaster relief is reliable comms on the ground. With multiple UtilitySats on orbit, Astranis can bring in extra capacity on incredibly short notice. Capacity that is compatible with existing, low-cost GEO ground terminals. In initial conversations with customers for UtilitySat, we’ve seen huge demand — these customers often want to lease the entire capacity of the satellite once they learn what UtilitySat can offer. Customers need all the capacity they can get, and new capacity that can be deployed on short notice is a huge deal and a huge departure from traditional GEO satellites. We see a future where customers will be able to call up extra capacity on demand to augment their existing capacity needs, and we’re making that future a reality. US Government applications The first UtilitySat mission will be a commercial one, but we are seeing enormous demand from both from commercial companies and from our government customers. The US Government has unique needs — Combatant Commanders need to be able to task dedicated satellites to specific AORs at a moment’s notice — and surge communications would give them a new tool in their toolbox, helping them win even in a contested environment. And more broadly speaking our military leaders have said the one priority in national security space is to add resiliency to our fleets, using larger numbers of smaller, flexible, and maneuverable satellites so we’re not dependent on just a handful of huge satellites in GEO. UtilitySat shows that Astranis can do just that. Not traditional GEO satellites UtilitySat is only possible because of Astranis’s unique technology — including our proprietary software–defined radio. The flexibility of having on-board digital signal processing allows us to build a standardized satellite design, and move a lot of what used to be done in hardware, into software. UtilitySat uses the standard Astranis MicroGEO platform, adding more frequency bands and some new software capabilities to make maximum use of the available spectrum, no matter where the satellite is on orbit. Traditional geostationary satellites are designed to sit in one orbital slot for up to 20 years, with a set of frequency bands that is hardwired in at the factory. Their single mission must be predetermined many years before they are launched. Astranis does not build traditional GEO satellites. From day one we knew there had to be a better way, and we’re doing it.
1:34

Excited to announce UtilitySat, the world’s first multi-mission geostationary satellite, that we're launching at the end of this year. This is a first of its kind. And a new product line-- providing on-demand connectivity for disaster relief, bridge capacity, and other missions. We started Astranis to build something new: small communications satellites that provide dedicated broadband capacity for our customers. At the end of this year we’re launching four more of them on a dedicated Falcon 9 rocket, with many more to come after that. That launch of four satellites includes one satellite for Peru, two satellites for in-flight connectivity, and a fourth satellite that had been previously kept under wraps. Until now. Introducing UtilitySat, the Swiss Army Knife of satellites This is a new product— the world’s first multi-mission commercial GEO satellite, capable of conducting multiple fully-operational broadband connectivity missions. And it is just the first of many. We’ll plan to launch many UtilitySats in the years to come. UtilitySat can provide connectivity on standard Ku, Ka, and Q/V bands, and has the flexibility to dial in exact frequencies using Astranis’s proprietary ultra-wideband software-defined radio. It can also relocate dozens of times around the GEO belt over its lifetime. It does this using our unique on-board dual-propulsion architecture, which includes both a chemical monopropellant system and an electric ion thruster. A new mission every year, or every month When we first began development of UtilitySat almost 2 years ago, we had many different missions in mind. UtilitySat can serve as bridge capacity for a customer that is waiting for a dedicated satellite, as an on-orbit spare, or as extra, surge capacity that can be brought in to supplement the broadband service we’re providing to one of our customers. There are acute needs as well — a natural disaster can wipe out terrestrial connectivity over a huge geographic area. One of the top priorities for first responders and during disaster relief is reliable comms on the ground. With multiple UtilitySats on orbit, Astranis can bring in extra capacity on incredibly short notice. Capacity that is compatible with existing, low-cost GEO ground terminals. In initial conversations with customers for UtilitySat, we’ve seen huge demand — these customers often want to lease the entire capacity of the satellite once they learn what UtilitySat can offer. Customers need all the capacity they can get, and new capacity that can be deployed on short notice is a huge deal and a huge departure from traditional GEO satellites. We see a future where customers will be able to call up extra capacity on demand to augment their existing capacity needs, and we’re making that future a reality. US Government applications The first UtilitySat mission will be a commercial one, but we are seeing enormous demand from both from commercial companies and from our government customers. The US Government has unique needs — Combatant Commanders need to be able to task dedicated satellites to specific AORs at a moment’s notice — and surge communications would give them a new tool in their toolbox, helping them win even in a contested environment. And more broadly speaking our military leaders have said the one priority in national security space is to add resiliency to our fleets, using larger numbers of smaller, flexible, and maneuverable satellites so we’re not dependent on just a handful of huge satellites in GEO. UtilitySat shows that Astranis can do just that. Not traditional GEO satellites UtilitySat is only possible because of Astranis’s unique technology — including our proprietary software–defined radio. The flexibility of having on-board digital signal processing allows us to build a standardized satellite design, and move a lot of what used to be done in hardware, into software. UtilitySat uses the standard Astranis MicroGEO platform, adding more frequency bands and some new software capabilities to make maximum use of the available spectrum, no matter where the satellite is on orbit. Traditional geostationary satellites are designed to sit in one orbital slot for up to 20 years, with a set of frequency bands that is hardwired in at the factory. Their single mission must be predetermined many years before they are launched. Astranis does not build traditional GEO satellites. From day one we knew there had to be a better way, and we’re doing it.

John Gedmark

122,069 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Convenience stores are decorating their stores with Jin-themed displays for ARMYs.🏪🐹 [MBN news] 260609 Busan Convenience Stores Gear Up for BTS Weekend 👩‍🏫Convenience stores in Busan are gearing up for a surge of customers as more than 100,000 people are expected to gather this weekend for BTS's concert. CU will significantly increase its stock of concert-related items, including rain gear, batteries, and portable power banks, at stores near the Busan Asiad Main Stadium, where the concert will be held. GS25 is placing liquor products associated with BTS Jin prominently at the front of its stores. Seven Eleven is boosting supplies of popular items favored by international visitors, such as banana milk, to meet increased tourist demand. GS25 IGIN 아이긴 방탄소년단 #JIN #방탄소년단진
0:29

Convenience stores are decorating their stores with Jin-themed displays for ARMYs.🏪🐹 [MBN news] 260609 Busan Convenience Stores Gear Up for BTS Weekend 👩‍🏫Convenience stores in Busan are gearing up for a surge of customers as more than 100,000 people are expected to gather this weekend for BTS's concert. CU will significantly increase its stock of concert-related items, including rain gear, batteries, and portable power banks, at stores near the Busan Asiad Main Stadium, where the concert will be held. GS25 is placing liquor products associated with BTS Jin prominently at the front of its stores. Seven Eleven is boosting supplies of popular items favored by international visitors, such as banana milk, to meet increased tourist demand. GS25 IGIN 아이긴 방탄소년단 #JIN #방탄소년단진

star_jin

14,935 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад