正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk This morning, Dispatch audio from Utah Authorities stating Charlie Kirk did not receive an Autopsy went Viral I dug around a bit… so the Utah Department of Public Safety Commissioner Beau Mason stated that Charlie Kirk’s body was transported to the State Medical Examiner’s Office on... the evening of September 10, 2025. It appears, I THINK, the dispatcher’s remark about no autopsy being performed likely refers to the procedure not taking place at the hospital, as it was conducted by a coroner at the State Medical Examiner’s Office. So by all means, even though he only confirms the body was moved to the Medical Examiner’s Office, we don’t know if one was officially done…, but I ASSUME, a full autopsy was already performed as legally required for homicide cases. The question remains, will an autopsy report ever be made to the public? Probably not… Under Utah law, medical examiner records, including autopsy reports, are classified as confidential and are not considered public documents. They can only be released to authorized parties, such as the decedent's next of kin, law enforcement, legal representatives, or attending physicians. In homicide cases like Charlie Kirk's, from what I read, “premature public disclosure could compromise evidence handling, witness interviews, or trial proceedings by revealing details that might influence potential jurors or tip off accomplices.” The Utah Office of the Medical Examiner has explicitly declined to comment on or release case-specific details, citing these confidentiality rules. As for the likelihood of the full report ever becoming public, it's low under standard procedures—likely less than 10%—since Utah does not treat these records as open under the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) unless a court orders otherwise. Partial details (e.g., cause and manner of death) might be released through court filings, such as during Tyler Robinson's trial for aggravated murder, where autopsy findings could be admitted as evidence and become accessible via trial transcripts or exhibits. However, even then, the complete report (including toxicology, photos, or investigative notes) would probably remain sealed or redacted to avoid prejudicing the case. Next of kin like Erika Kirk could theoretically request and share a copy, but there's no indication she plans to.show more

MJTruthUltra

599,406 subscribers

326,292 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Utah Dispatch says No Autopsy was Performed on Charlie Kirk Kinda suspect…. 🤔 In Utah, an autopsy is mandatory in cases of murder or assassination (both classified as homicides) if the medical examiner determines it is necessary to establish the cause and manner of death, aid in criminal prosecution, or protect an innocent person from accusation. This falls under Utah's medical examiner laws, which require the state medical examiner to investigate and assume custody of bodies in violent or suspicious deaths, including homicides. Remember, Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet said Kolvet said the doctor described Kirk’s bone as “so healthy” and “so impressive that he’s like the man of steel.” The bullet was eventually found lodged just beneath the skin. Other reports say the coroner found it.

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Utah Dispatch says No Autopsy was Performed on Charlie Kirk Kinda suspect…. 🤔 In Utah, an autopsy is mandatory in cases of murder or assassination (both classified as homicides) if the medical examiner determines it is necessary to establish the cause and manner of death, aid in criminal prosecution, or protect an innocent person from accusation. This falls under Utah's medical examiner laws, which require the state medical examiner to investigate and assume custody of bodies in violent or suspicious deaths, including homicides. Remember, Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet said Kolvet said the doctor described Kirk’s bone as “so healthy” and “so impressive that he’s like the man of steel.” The bullet was eventually found lodged just beneath the skin. Other reports say the coroner found it.

MJTruthUltra

433,695 次观看 • 10 个月前

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

‼️👀No Autopsy: Audio claiming that there was no autopsy done on Charlie Kirk. Stating that the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Utah Law says: “In Utah, when a person is murdered (a death by violence), the law mandates that an autopsy must be done if the medical examiner deems it necessary or the prosecutor requests it. To refuse or omit one in a homicide case is illegal under Utah Code § 26-4-6. If true, there is a massive coverup going on. Here is the problem. The case against the shooter is already lost. There is no credible evidence to substantiate a conviction. If No Autopsy Is Done Procedural Violation: Failing to perform an autopsy in such a case could itself be a violation of law, potentially subjecting officials to administrative or even legal challenges. Prosecution Problems: Without an autopsy, the cause and manner of death are not medically certified. Evidence like bullet trajectory, wound analysis, toxicology, and time of death may be missing. This weakens or even cripples the ability to prove homicide beyond a reasonable doubt. In Utah, not doing an autopsy in a murder case is both legally improper and practically devastating to prosecution. If one wasn’t done in the Charlie Kirk assassination, it’s an enormous red flag H/t: HustleBitch

Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv

182,704 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨Baron Coleman Breaking: Under Utah law, Charlie Kirk was not required to undergo an autopsy. Moreover, recorded police scanner audio reveals that an officer explicitly stated that he did not receive one. Scanner transcript: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” Utah Code Title 26B, Chapter 8 makes that possible! • The medical examiner shall assume jurisdiction over deaths by violence or gunshot. • An autopsy shall be performed only “if, in the opinion of the medical examiner, an autopsy should be performed or if an autopsy is requested by the district attorney or county attorney having criminal jurisdiction, or by the attorney general” Here's where it gets really interesting! 👀 Charlie’s motorcade departed from Timpanogos Regional Hospital around 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025, to transport his deceased body to the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner in Taylorsville. The search warrant affidavit states that an autopsy was conducted on the body the same day, with Sgt. Barrett present. A standard forensic autopsy (external examination, internal examination, organ weighing, documentation, and sample collection) is a multi-hour process. Starting well after 8:00 p.m. and still producing a completed, certifiable result on the same calendar day creates an incredibly tight window to achieve that. Furthermore, during cross-examination at the preliminary hearing, Investigator Sgt. David Hull, who presented the summary, confirmed that he was not present at the examination and only had knowledge of its contents from a meeting with the medical examiner and the written report. So where is the medical examiner that allegedly performed this autopsy?! In March 2026, Guajardo relocated from Utah to Dutchess County, New York, where he was appointed as the Medical Examiner. As a result of his relocation, he is no longer affiliated with the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner and is geographically and jurisdictionally removed from the case. What about Sgt. Barrett, the officer who allegedly could be a witness? In any publicly available court filing or official disclosure, no full first name, badge number, or other identifying information for this Sgt. Barrett has been released. The prosecution’s entire account of the postmortem examination rests on two named individuals who have never testified under oath about it. One has left the state and taken a new position in New York; the other remains unidentified beyond a last name in a single affidavit. The only testimony introduced at the preliminary hearing on this point was hearsay from an investigator who was not present. This leaves no firsthand, testifying witness available to describe, under cross-examination, what actually occurred after the body left the hospital near 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025... Was Charlie Kirk cremated after no autopsy was performed?! How could they not perform an autopsy on Charlie?! This SCREAMS coverup. Make sure to watch Baron’s entire episode from last night! There’s a lot of information that’s not covered here that you won’t want to miss!

🚨Baron Coleman Breaking: Under Utah law, Charlie Kirk was not required to undergo an autopsy. Moreover, recorded police scanner audio reveals that an officer explicitly stated that he did not receive one. Scanner transcript: “He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital.” Utah Code Title 26B, Chapter 8 makes that possible! • The medical examiner shall assume jurisdiction over deaths by violence or gunshot. • An autopsy shall be performed only “if, in the opinion of the medical examiner, an autopsy should be performed or if an autopsy is requested by the district attorney or county attorney having criminal jurisdiction, or by the attorney general” Here's where it gets really interesting! 👀 Charlie’s motorcade departed from Timpanogos Regional Hospital around 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025, to transport his deceased body to the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner in Taylorsville. The search warrant affidavit states that an autopsy was conducted on the body the same day, with Sgt. Barrett present. A standard forensic autopsy (external examination, internal examination, organ weighing, documentation, and sample collection) is a multi-hour process. Starting well after 8:00 p.m. and still producing a completed, certifiable result on the same calendar day creates an incredibly tight window to achieve that. Furthermore, during cross-examination at the preliminary hearing, Investigator Sgt. David Hull, who presented the summary, confirmed that he was not present at the examination and only had knowledge of its contents from a meeting with the medical examiner and the written report. So where is the medical examiner that allegedly performed this autopsy?! In March 2026, Guajardo relocated from Utah to Dutchess County, New York, where he was appointed as the Medical Examiner. As a result of his relocation, he is no longer affiliated with the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner and is geographically and jurisdictionally removed from the case. What about Sgt. Barrett, the officer who allegedly could be a witness? In any publicly available court filing or official disclosure, no full first name, badge number, or other identifying information for this Sgt. Barrett has been released. The prosecution’s entire account of the postmortem examination rests on two named individuals who have never testified under oath about it. One has left the state and taken a new position in New York; the other remains unidentified beyond a last name in a single affidavit. The only testimony introduced at the preliminary hearing on this point was hearsay from an investigator who was not present. This leaves no firsthand, testifying witness available to describe, under cross-examination, what actually occurred after the body left the hospital near 8:00 p.m. on September 10, 2025... Was Charlie Kirk cremated after no autopsy was performed?! How could they not perform an autopsy on Charlie?! This SCREAMS coverup. Make sure to watch Baron’s entire episode from last night! There’s a lot of information that’s not covered here that you won’t want to miss!

Travis

170,569 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 BOMBSHELL:Leaked Audio Proves No Autopsy on Charlie Kirk After Assassination —AGAINST STATE LAW! Leaked police dispatch audio from the day Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University reveals: NO AUTOPSY WAS PERFORMED on his body. 🎧 Listen to the chilling exchange: Dispatcher: “He did not go in for an autopsy. Death certificate was signed by a doctor at the hospital.” Officer: “Okay… just do a field sup (supplementary report) documenting there is no autopsie.” 🤯 WHAT?! A high-profile assassination — gunshot to the neck, suspect Tyler Robinson charged with murder — and the #1 piece of evidence (Charlie’s body) skipped a mandatory autopsy? 📜 Under Utah Code §26B-8-213, the medical examiner SHALL perform an autopsy “to aid in the discovery and prosecution of a crime” & “protect an innocent person accused.” Yet here we are: ⚠️ No ballistics match-up ⚠️ No toxicology ⚠️ No exit wound analysis Was this really a lone gunman? Any accomplices? Why break state law on a case this huge? 👀 WHO MADE THE CALL? Medical examiner? Hospital doc? Someone higher up? Utah officials owe the public answers. 💥 This stinks of a COVER-UP. Tag Candace Owens And Make Sure See See's This...

Project Constitution

66,035 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨REPORT: I Asked the Mississippi Medical Examiner About a Potential Disclosure of Sensitive Information Regarding Nolan Wells. They Have Yet to Respond. I sent a formal request for comment to the Mississippi Chief Medical Examiner regarding statements made by two women in a viral TikTok video. As of today, my questions remain unanswered. The women publicly stated they were told by someone involved in transporting bodies that Nolan Wells was transported face down following his second autopsy. Since then, I have learned that transporting a drowning victim face down after an autopsy is a recognized practice because it allows postmortem fluids to drain and helps preserve the body during transport. If these women knew Nolan was transported face down before that information was ever made public - and they themselves said they learned it from someone involved in transporting bodies - then someone with knowledge of the transport appears to have shared sensitive, nonpublic information. This needs to be investigated. I asked the Medical Examiner’s Office straightforward questions: •Was the office aware of these public statements? •Has it initiated or requested a review into whether sensitive information regarding Nolan’s transport was improperly disclosed? •What confidentiality policies apply to personnel and contractors involved in transporting decedents? •Would the office like to issue a public statement? Also! For weeks, people on the internet have pushed theories that Nolan did not drown and was instead murdered by some other means. Yet the reported transport method is consistent with how drowning victims are handled after an autopsy. It aligns with (not contradicts) the official determination that Nolan drowned. The two women appeared to treat the fact that he was transported face down as though it were shocking or disrespectful. In reality, if that information is accurate, it is consistent with established post-autopsy handling practices for drowning victims. These women may have accidentally dispelled many of the wild conspiracy theories. But the bigger issue is the apparent disclosure of sensitive information. If they were accurately repeating information provided by someone involved in transporting Nolan’s body, the public deserves to know whether that information was disclosed appropriately or whether confidentiality policies were violated. That is exactly why I contacted the Medical Examiner’s Office. I will continue asking questions until I receive answers. If the Medical Examiner’s Office responds, I will publish its statement in full.

🚨REPORT: I Asked the Mississippi Medical Examiner About a Potential Disclosure of Sensitive Information Regarding Nolan Wells. They Have Yet to Respond. I sent a formal request for comment to the Mississippi Chief Medical Examiner regarding statements made by two women in a viral TikTok video. As of today, my questions remain unanswered. The women publicly stated they were told by someone involved in transporting bodies that Nolan Wells was transported face down following his second autopsy. Since then, I have learned that transporting a drowning victim face down after an autopsy is a recognized practice because it allows postmortem fluids to drain and helps preserve the body during transport. If these women knew Nolan was transported face down before that information was ever made public - and they themselves said they learned it from someone involved in transporting bodies - then someone with knowledge of the transport appears to have shared sensitive, nonpublic information. This needs to be investigated. I asked the Medical Examiner’s Office straightforward questions: •Was the office aware of these public statements? •Has it initiated or requested a review into whether sensitive information regarding Nolan’s transport was improperly disclosed? •What confidentiality policies apply to personnel and contractors involved in transporting decedents? •Would the office like to issue a public statement? Also! For weeks, people on the internet have pushed theories that Nolan did not drown and was instead murdered by some other means. Yet the reported transport method is consistent with how drowning victims are handled after an autopsy. It aligns with (not contradicts) the official determination that Nolan drowned. The two women appeared to treat the fact that he was transported face down as though it were shocking or disrespectful. In reality, if that information is accurate, it is consistent with established post-autopsy handling practices for drowning victims. These women may have accidentally dispelled many of the wild conspiracy theories. But the bigger issue is the apparent disclosure of sensitive information. If they were accurately repeating information provided by someone involved in transporting Nolan’s body, the public deserves to know whether that information was disclosed appropriately or whether confidentiality policies were violated. That is exactly why I contacted the Medical Examiner’s Office. I will continue asking questions until I receive answers. If the Medical Examiner’s Office responds, I will publish its statement in full.

Sarah Fields

37,456 次观看 • 19 天前

‼️Candace Just Spoke to a WITNESS Who Was At Timpanogos Hospital That Day — Plus MAJOR Red Flags About the Medical Examiner Who Did Charlie’s Autopsy👀 Candace Owens dropped two significant developments tonight. First, her producer Ashley made a major discovery about the medical examiner who performed Charlie’s autopsy — a man Candace referred to as “Doctor Andrew.” According to the information they uncovered, it was the fastest autopsy ever conducted in the state of Utah. They didn’t even bring the body down to the proper temperature before beginning the examination. Second, Candace confirmed she has now spoken directly with a witness who was at Timpanogos Regional Hospital the day Charlie was brought in. She described the account as incredible and noted there may be a reason so few people from the emergency room have been willing to speak publicly until now. She’s still processing the full details, but made clear both the hospital witness and the information on the medical examiner are significant. Full breakdown in tonight’s episode. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

‼️Candace Just Spoke to a WITNESS Who Was At Timpanogos Hospital That Day — Plus MAJOR Red Flags About the Medical Examiner Who Did Charlie’s Autopsy👀 Candace Owens dropped two significant developments tonight. First, her producer Ashley made a major discovery about the medical examiner who performed Charlie’s autopsy — a man Candace referred to as “Doctor Andrew.” According to the information they uncovered, it was the fastest autopsy ever conducted in the state of Utah. They didn’t even bring the body down to the proper temperature before beginning the examination. Second, Candace confirmed she has now spoken directly with a witness who was at Timpanogos Regional Hospital the day Charlie was brought in. She described the account as incredible and noted there may be a reason so few people from the emergency room have been willing to speak publicly until now. She’s still processing the full details, but made clear both the hospital witness and the information on the medical examiner are significant. Full breakdown in tonight’s episode. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

54,312 次观看 • 6 天前

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

🚨BIZARRE: The Autopsy Lie —First No Autopsy, Now a “Fake” Autopsy Report? 🧐Two Conflicting Stories About Charlie Kirk’s Death That Both REEK of a COVER-UP! This is insane. First we were told there was NO AUTOPSY —that Erica Kirk simply signed the death certificate and Charlie’s body was rushed out. Now new reports claim an autopsy WAS performed and even list shocking details of a 30-06 rifle wound. Two completely opposite stories. Two completely opposite timelines. And the FBI + media? Dead silent. 📝 If there really was no autopsy, that’s illegal under Utah law for a violent homicide. 📝 If there was an autopsy, the “official” report doesn’t match the surgeon’s statement about where the bullet traveled or the lack of an exit wound. None of it adds up. Why is the high-quality footage from that night hidden? Why won’t they release the full autopsy or the ballistics report? These are the only two things we need to solve the case — and they’re the only two things we’re NOT getting. Watch this video by Nathan Cornacchia and Alex Jones and see the evidence yourself. The inconsistencies are insane. This is either the sloppiest investigation ever or a full-on cover-up. I'll drop the FULL VIDEO in the COMMENTS Below, I highly suggest you all go watch it as there is a lot more i had to cut out for time. Also make sure to FOLLOW him on X and Youtube and go give his video a LIKE. 👀 Watch. Share. Save. ⚠️ Don’t let this story disappear.

Project Constitution

23,783 次观看 • 10 个月前

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

BULLET REMOVED before autopsy and people at Charlie Kirk event said they don't believe official story. NO ONE inline waiting for Charlie Kirk event on Sunday said they believed the official narrative of the assassination. Andrew Kolvet, from TPUSA, has stated that Charlie Kirk's surgeon removed the bullet from Charlie, after he was already confirmed deceased. There is no clear indication or answer as to why the bullet was removed before an autopsy was ever conducted. I don't even no what to say anymore. I hope we get some answers soon. One thing to take into consideration is that there is still an ongoing investigation and they do have information crucial to the case that they WILL NOT release yet, and there probably is a good reason for it as well. Until everything is released we can not make a final conclusion. The truth is all we want.

The SCIF

830,355 次观看 • 10 个月前

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

Curtis Houck

277,771 次观看 • 27 天前

Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security says there was 100% an autopsy performed and Charlie Kirk had a “Pulse” in the Emergency Room He says he didn’t want everyone to think there was a JFK-like “conspiracy” and wanted the Autopsy report asap. He said JD Vance called in and asked what they needed — An autopsy report asap he said. Clip Full Show

Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security says there was 100% an autopsy performed and Charlie Kirk had a “Pulse” in the Emergency Room He says he didn’t want everyone to think there was a JFK-like “conspiracy” and wanted the Autopsy report asap. He said JD Vance called in and asked what they needed — An autopsy report asap he said. Clip Full Show

MJTruthUltra

9,540,229 次观看 • 8 个月前

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk was reportedly taken to Timpanogos Regional Hospital — However, a medical Staffer produced a Medical File Showing Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley Hospital 🔻 Important Context: - Utah Valley Hospital, a Level II trauma center, was closer to UVU. 4.2 miles. 8–12 min drive from UVU. - Timpanogos Regional Hospital, a Level IV Trauma Center, was further away, 5.8 miles. 12–15 min drive from UVU. - Transport to Timpanogos Regional (Level IV) deviated from standard protocol for a gunshot wound. - Protocol for serious gunshot wounds in Utah County: bypass Level IV/V facilities and go directly to Utah Valley Hospital (Level II) unless the patient is in immediate cardiac arrest or the closer facility is en route. In short: Timpanogos can and does treat gunshot wounds, but Utah Valley Hospital is the designated and more capable center for life-threatening cases like Charlie Kirk’s. Candace asks the medical community to weigh in on if this could happen between the two hospitals. Why would Charlie have a medical file at Utah Medical Center?

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk was reportedly taken to Timpanogos Regional Hospital — However, a medical Staffer produced a Medical File Showing Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley Hospital 🔻 Important Context: - Utah Valley Hospital, a Level II trauma center, was closer to UVU. 4.2 miles. 8–12 min drive from UVU. - Timpanogos Regional Hospital, a Level IV Trauma Center, was further away, 5.8 miles. 12–15 min drive from UVU. - Transport to Timpanogos Regional (Level IV) deviated from standard protocol for a gunshot wound. - Protocol for serious gunshot wounds in Utah County: bypass Level IV/V facilities and go directly to Utah Valley Hospital (Level II) unless the patient is in immediate cardiac arrest or the closer facility is en route. In short: Timpanogos can and does treat gunshot wounds, but Utah Valley Hospital is the designated and more capable center for life-threatening cases like Charlie Kirk’s. Candace asks the medical community to weigh in on if this could happen between the two hospitals. Why would Charlie have a medical file at Utah Medical Center?

MJTruthUltra

824,499 次观看 • 9 个月前

FLASHBACK: Tucker’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s “suicide”: “What Bill Barr said about Jeffrey Epstein was transparently absurd and very obviously dishonest. Barr began by claiming that the medical examiner conducted Epstein's autopsy ruled his death a suicide but that is not true. The initial cause of death following the autopsy was not suicide but quote: “PENDING”, which is to say ‘unclear’. The medical examiner who performed could not say how Jeffrey Epstein died. The autopsy forensic pathologist, Michael Baden who was also present that day came away believing Epstein had been MURDERED. After reviewing more than 1,000 suicides, by hanging in New York State Baden later said, he couldn't find a single neck injury not one that match the injury that Epstein sustained Jeffrey Epstein DID NOT KILL HIMSELF. Baden concluded he was strangled. The physical evidence he saw at the autopsy made that obvious. But New York City's chief medical examiner, Barbara Sampson who was NOT present at the autopsy overruled the judgment of those who were days later on the basis of no new evidence or investigation. Barbara Sampson simply declared Jeffrey Epstein's death a suicide.”

FLASHBACK: Tucker’s report on Jeffrey Epstein’s “suicide”: “What Bill Barr said about Jeffrey Epstein was transparently absurd and very obviously dishonest. Barr began by claiming that the medical examiner conducted Epstein's autopsy ruled his death a suicide but that is not true. The initial cause of death following the autopsy was not suicide but quote: “PENDING”, which is to say ‘unclear’. The medical examiner who performed could not say how Jeffrey Epstein died. The autopsy forensic pathologist, Michael Baden who was also present that day came away believing Epstein had been MURDERED. After reviewing more than 1,000 suicides, by hanging in New York State Baden later said, he couldn't find a single neck injury not one that match the injury that Epstein sustained Jeffrey Epstein DID NOT KILL HIMSELF. Baden concluded he was strangled. The physical evidence he saw at the autopsy made that obvious. But New York City's chief medical examiner, Barbara Sampson who was NOT present at the autopsy overruled the judgment of those who were days later on the basis of no new evidence or investigation. Barbara Sampson simply declared Jeffrey Epstein's death a suicide.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

921,232 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 ERIKA KIRK REFUSES TO ANSWER ONE QUESTION... WAS CHARLIE CREMATED? Candace Owens is now publicly asking whether Charlie Kirk was quietly cremated. People are pointing to a series of unusual claims: • Reports that no full autopsy was completed • The hospital he was taken to (not the closest one) had a brand new CEO and lead surgeon • The coroner on the case was also reportedly brand new, and the name still hasn’t been released Erika Kirk has repeatedly refused to answer questions about what happened to Charlie’s body. Instead, she’s asked for one thing. One private, sacred resting place for Charlie. Some say she has every right to privacy. Others note she previously shared photos and videos of Charlie’s embalmed body with the public on social media. Was Charlie cremated… or is something else being kept from the public?

HustleBitch

17,782 次观看 • 7 天前

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 次观看 • 2 年前

REPORT: The Collin County Medical Examiner’s Office is receiving dozens of requests from Tiffney Billions and her group of activists in an effort to “bully” the office into releasing Austin Metcalf’s autopsy report and photos of his body after he was stbbed in the heart by Karmelo Anthony. These activists plan to send daily emails and requests as part of a new campaign to have the report released. Based on my sources and past statements from authorities, due to the sensitive and high-profile nature of this case, these reports will NOT be released. Activists will not be permitted to shape the narrative of this case. Tiffney Billions also bragged about running multiple campaigns for Karmelo Anthony, including a petition to “Have Hunter Metcalf Charged with Mrder” (Austin’s brother), a campaign to “Free the Footage,” and the “HeyKarmelo” campaign. All have failed.

Sarah Fields

36,370 次观看 • 11 个月前

Kayleigh McEnany SLAPS AROUND Utah Judge Tony Graff for REFUSING to rule on whether there is sufficient evidence for Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the ass*ssination of Charlie Kirk until September. “This is mind-blowing… This is inexcusable. I am angry about it.” “Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution, which allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah Code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? ‘The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant.’” “Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to her family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial — a litany of other rights. But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar.” “There’s ballistic evidence, there’s DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's the roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed?… We're not even going to get his plea until a year after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial until a year from when Charlie was ass*ssinated?” “This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it.”

Kayleigh McEnany SLAPS AROUND Utah Judge Tony Graff for REFUSING to rule on whether there is sufficient evidence for Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the assssination of Charlie Kirk until September. “This is mind-blowing… This is inexcusable. I am angry about it.” “Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution, which allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah Code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? ‘The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant.’” “Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to her family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial — a litany of other rights. But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar.” “There’s ballistic evidence, there’s DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's the roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed?… We're not even going to get his plea until a year after Charlie Kirk was assssinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial until a year from when Charlie was ass*ssinated?” “This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it.”

RedWave Press

74,739 次观看 • 27 天前

REPORT: The FBI secretly released would be Trump assas*in Thomas Crooks' body to be cremated before Rep. Clay Higgins could examine it. According to a preliminary investigative report from Higgins, the FBI cremated Crooks' body without telling anyone 10 days after the PA rally tragedy. "My effort to examine Crooks’ body on Monday, August 5, caused quite a stir and revealed a disturbing fact… the FBI released the body for cremation 10 days after J13," the report reveals. "On J23, Crooks was gone. Nobody knew this until Monday, August 5, including the County Coroner, law enforcement, Sheriff, etc." "Yes, Butler County Coroner technically had legal authority over the body, but I spoke with the Coroner, and he would have never released Crooks’ body to the family for cremation or burial without specific permission from the FBI." "The coroner’s report and autopsy report are both “late.” As of Monday, August 5, they were a week late. The problem with me not being able to examine the actual body is that I won’t know 100% if the coroner’s report and the autopsy report are accurate. We will actually never know."

REPORT: The FBI secretly released would be Trump assas*in Thomas Crooks' body to be cremated before Rep. Clay Higgins could examine it. According to a preliminary investigative report from Higgins, the FBI cremated Crooks' body without telling anyone 10 days after the PA rally tragedy. "My effort to examine Crooks’ body on Monday, August 5, caused quite a stir and revealed a disturbing fact… the FBI released the body for cremation 10 days after J13," the report reveals. "On J23, Crooks was gone. Nobody knew this until Monday, August 5, including the County Coroner, law enforcement, Sheriff, etc." "Yes, Butler County Coroner technically had legal authority over the body, but I spoke with the Coroner, and he would have never released Crooks’ body to the family for cremation or burial without specific permission from the FBI." "The coroner’s report and autopsy report are both “late.” As of Monday, August 5, they were a week late. The problem with me not being able to examine the actual body is that I won’t know 100% if the coroner’s report and the autopsy report are accurate. We will actually never know."

Collin Rugg

2,325,807 次观看 • 2 年前

Charlie Kirk was not wearing a bulletproof fest according to his wife Erika. The investigation continues. According to grok, Erika Kirk made this claim during a New York Times interview conducted on Thursday, September 18, 2025—eight days after Charlie Kirk's shooting on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. In the interview, published on September 21, 2025, she said she had urged him over dinner to wear a bulletproof vest for his safety, but he refused, citing trust in his security team and event protections. A friend had also suggested speaking behind bulletproof glass, which he declined. Although the interview doesn't directly reference a "Korner report" (likely a misspelling of "coroner report"), it aligns with details from the Utah County coroner and the surgeon who treated Kirk. The coroner noted the bullet lodged just beneath his skin in his neck without exiting, while the surgeon called it a "miracle" that the high-velocity round didn't pass through, crediting Kirk's bone density and describing him as "the man of steel." These findings support a direct neck wound, consistent with no vest being worn, as a ricochet from armor would likely show a different trajectory or entry point.

Charlie Kirk was not wearing a bulletproof fest according to his wife Erika. The investigation continues. According to grok, Erika Kirk made this claim during a New York Times interview conducted on Thursday, September 18, 2025—eight days after Charlie Kirk's shooting on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. In the interview, published on September 21, 2025, she said she had urged him over dinner to wear a bulletproof vest for his safety, but he refused, citing trust in his security team and event protections. A friend had also suggested speaking behind bulletproof glass, which he declined. Although the interview doesn't directly reference a "Korner report" (likely a misspelling of "coroner report"), it aligns with details from the Utah County coroner and the surgeon who treated Kirk. The coroner noted the bullet lodged just beneath his skin in his neck without exiting, while the surgeon called it a "miracle" that the high-velocity round didn't pass through, crediting Kirk's bone density and describing him as "the man of steel." These findings support a direct neck wound, consistent with no vest being worn, as a ricochet from armor would likely show a different trajectory or entry point.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

308,038 次观看 • 10 个月前

‼️ BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk is LEGALLY DISQUALIFIED as Victim Rep In Tyler Robinson Trial—Utah Statute EXPOSED👀 Zach from WolvesAndFinance just exposed a great point that nobody is talking about from the April 17 evidentiary hearing. Erika Kirk does NOT legally qualify as the victim representative. She filed to invoke speedy trial rights as Charlie’s widow… but Utah law explicitly disqualifies anyone who “appears to be accountable or otherwise criminally involved” in the crime. The statute is crystal clear: if there is even the appearance of involvement or suspicion, you’re out. And Erika’s alibi? It keeps changing: Hospital parking lot with her mom? At the airport? Or was she at the Hopkinson Aircraft office when she got the news? Why can’t we get a straight story months later? The clip breaks it all down with the exact Utah statute. This isn’t conspiracy — it’s the law. And it raises massive questions about why the judge even allowed her to claim these rights. Do you think Erika Kirk appears suspicious enough to disqualify her as victim rep? 👀 Drop a 🔥 if this needs to go viral and RT so the Judge can’t ignore it. FOLLOW WolvesAndFinance and watch his FULL video linked below.👇

‼️ BOMBSHELL: Erika Kirk is LEGALLY DISQUALIFIED as Victim Rep In Tyler Robinson Trial—Utah Statute EXPOSED👀 Zach from WolvesAndFinance just exposed a great point that nobody is talking about from the April 17 evidentiary hearing. Erika Kirk does NOT legally qualify as the victim representative. She filed to invoke speedy trial rights as Charlie’s widow… but Utah law explicitly disqualifies anyone who “appears to be accountable or otherwise criminally involved” in the crime. The statute is crystal clear: if there is even the appearance of involvement or suspicion, you’re out. And Erika’s alibi? It keeps changing: Hospital parking lot with her mom? At the airport? Or was she at the Hopkinson Aircraft office when she got the news? Why can’t we get a straight story months later? The clip breaks it all down with the exact Utah statute. This isn’t conspiracy — it’s the law. And it raises massive questions about why the judge even allowed her to claim these rights. Do you think Erika Kirk appears suspicious enough to disqualify her as victim rep? 👀 Drop a 🔥 if this needs to go viral and RT so the Judge can’t ignore it. FOLLOW WolvesAndFinance and watch his FULL video linked below.👇

Project Constitution

256,843 次观看 • 3 个月前